Misplaced Pages

Talk:Dravidian peoples: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:10, 16 December 2005 edit68.107.174.166 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:23, 23 December 2024 edit undoArjayay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers625,587 editsm →A small mistake in the article: Done + Tx 
(740 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
==Sri Aurobindo==
{{Talk header}}
I'm sorry by I cannot accept this paragraph:
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN
|action1date=07:38, 6 September 2009
|action1link=Talk:Dravidian peoples/GA1
|action1result=failed
|action1oldid=309033700


|currentstatus=FGAN
"However, other notable scholars, such as Sri Aurobindo, have demonstrated that there is no such an ethnic or linguistic division between the north Indians and the south Indians. Max Muller's theory was officially supported by the British colonian authorities, who adhered to the "divide and rule" principle."
|topic=Culture and society
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Anthropology|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|attention=yes|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject India|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Bangladesh|importance=mid|history=yes}}
{{WikiProject Languages |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Dravidian languages}}
}}
{{To do|collapsed=yes}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age=2160
| archiveprefix=Talk:Dravidian peoples/Archive
| numberstart=1
| maxarchsize=250000
| header={{Archive}}
| minkeepthreads=5
| minarchthreads=1
| format= %%i
}}


== brahmins are not dravidians ==
Firstly Aurobindo is a religious scholar, not an expert on genetics, ethnicity and and linguistics. He has not 'demonstrated' anything on this issue, he simply had a pan-Indian belief system.


there is a line linking a "tamil brahmin madisar" to the clothing of "dravidian women". there are no links to a tamil brahmin, who follow indo aryan culture, to that of the native dravidian people. adopting a sari does not make them "dravidian". genetic studies also disagree. ] (]) 18:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
: I agree; I will change the above sentence to say that Aurobindo ''believed'' that there is no ethnic distinction, rather than say that he ''demonstrated'' it. However, several historians have put forth the theory that there is no ethnic distinction - see ] for sources. I will add a sentence to that effect too. --] 01:18, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
:Misplaced Pages is not a place for "ethnic cleansing"; people are generally identified as those speaking a particular language or following a particular culture for generations and identify themselves as belonging to that group; this can even override any genetic analysis. It's just whatever the sources say. ] (]) 04:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
::Copied and pasted messages don't work buddy, you need to stop pushing your offensive and dominant ideologies on others' who want nothing to do with you. ] (]) 23:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)


== Sheduled tribes in India ==
Secondly 'Max Muller's theory' was not officially supported by by the Britrish government. Show me any document in which the government 'officially' supports the theory for political reasons.


Are all Central Dravidian (Kolami–Parji), North Dravidian (Brahui-Kurukh), Gondi-Kui languages speakers considered as sheduled tribes in India? ] (]) 08:15, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
: Agreed. Several British historians adhered to the theory, but it is not right to say that the British government "officially" supported the theory. I will remove that sentence. --] 01:18, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)


== Add other South Indian kingdoms architecture to dravidian architecture. ==
The divide and rule argument is absurd. Since the Aryan/Dravidian distinction is about two separate areas of the land they are already divided. I can't see how Speaking of this ethnic distinction would in any way make British rule easier.


Like Vijayanagaras. ] (]) 06:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
: Personally, I don't think the divide and rule argument is absurd, and I do see how instilling a belief that there is an ethnic distinction would help the British rule - but whether they did it or not is POV, and has already been dealt with in ]. I will just add a link to that article here and remove that sentence.--] 01:18, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)


== Recent changes ==
:: I accept that 'absurd' is OTT, but I have never seen any evidence for this so-called 'divide and rule' strategy, nor do I understand ''how'' the claim that there is a racial difference between Dravidians and Aryans would assist British rule. Historically India ''was'' divided into different kingdoms, so such divisions already existed. Now the idea that the Indian upper castes were 'Aryans' ''could'' indeed help British rule, by allying the native Indian ruling classes to British rule on the ideology of pan-Aryanism. But the ethno-linguistic distinction between Aryan and Dravidian peoples would alienate South Indians, including their leaders. Overplaying the Aryan idea would be ''threatening'' to British rule. For this reason, though Aryanism was indeed part of the culture of British imperialism, I've found no evidence that it was ever a tool of policy. Unlike the Nazis the British were far too canny to let their ideology rule their practical policy..--] 23:11, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
{{yo|Fylindfotberserk}}, {{yo|Joshua Jonathan}}, {{yo|Doug Weller}} Can you please review these recent changes: . Thought of restoring ]'s version as on 5 April 2024. Checking with others to be doubly sure. ] (]) 06:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)


:{{ping|Rasnaboy}} Yeah, I see a lot of unnecessary and ] stuff. It is not a "ethnicity" (supra- or otherwise). It is a collection of ethno-linguistic groups that are tehmselves diverse. You can restore version and start from there if necessary. - ] (]) 11:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
: So essentially, the whole paragraph can be removed. In fact, the whole article looks pretty lame to me, but I will see what I can do to clean it up. --] 01:18, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
::Thank you, {{ping|Fylindfotberserk}}. Done. ] (]) 12:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Glad someone else did it, I'm wiped out. ] ] 15:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
::::The same user now appears to engage in edit warring at ] (, , ) and ] (, , ). I've already reverted their edits twice and warned them on their talk page, but they have vowed to continue with their removal of sourced contents. May require admin intervention. ] (]) 18:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)


== A small mistake in the article ==
:: I've removed the claim that ] first used the term Dravidian race. I can find no evidence of this. Indeed Muller was not a race-theorist or a Dravidianist. I've tried to make a more general summary of the role played by race in the modelling of Indian populations by the British. ..--] 18:04, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


There is a small mistake around in the ] where John Marshall the United States founding father is mistaken for John Marshall for the archaeologist. Please replace the link with the statesman with the ]. ] (]) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:: There is nothing 'POV' about saying that Tamil is the 'most important' of the Dravidian languages. The point not that it's a better language in some way, but that it is the most widely spoken and has the largest literature. It's necessary to introduce Tamil at this stage so that an uninformed reader will understand that 'Tamils' - referred to later in the article - are the principal sub-group of Dravidian speakers. Still, I shall try to rephrase it. ] 02:24, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
:{{Done}} Thanks for pointing that out. - ] (]) 23:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

: Thanks, the re-phrasing reads well. I agree that is is certainly the best-known of the Dravidian languages. --] 02:49, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

==To Anon user==

"Telugu and Kannada have some striking similarity to Sanskrit, while ] is the least affected by Sanskrit. Telugu is over 70% Sanskrit."

Does this mean Telugu ''vocabulary'' is over 70% Sanskrit? Telugu grammar? Without more context, I think it is safer to say that Kannada and Telugu resemble Sanskrit more than Tamil does.

Also, most of the information in the "Dravidian languages" section seems to belong in the ] article, not in this one. --] 00:11, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

== Possible Copyright violation by ] ==

I will remove a large bulk of text, because it is copied from this site and a copyright violation is likely: Apart from this, there may also a POV problem, since it only cites two older studies with the same POV.

==Telugu/Kannada Aryans?==
I found it's strange that author has mentioned Telugus/Kannadigas having Aryan(whatever that means) admixture based on Sanskirt words in those languages. Believe it or not, it's not Kannada or Telugu but Malayalam which has the highest percentage of Sanskrit words. All these languages follow Sanskrit grammar. But it has more to do with Brahmin dominance in these regions than any Aryan mixture. I suppose it's obvious when education/knowledge was a complete Brahmin phenomemon in the past the languages were also developed according to their discretion. Also, even Buddhists and Shaivites also made Sanskrit as the language of the religion further paving way for Sanskrit words into these languages.
--] (17 Aug 2005 14:17 IST)
:Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs changing, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Misplaced Pages is a ], so ''anyone'' can edit any article by simply following the '''{{MediaWiki:edit}}''' link. You don't even need to ]! (Although there are some ]...) The Misplaced Pages community encourages you to ]. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes&mdash;they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out ], or try out the ] to try out your editing skills. ]. -- ] <sup>\] \]</sup> 09:03, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

== Page move ==

I think this page should be moved to ], ] or ]. The term "Dravidian Race" is an 19th century invention, while the term Dravidian itself has a long and probably complex history that is not really mentioned in the article. Somebody really should write something about the history and etymology of the term Dravidian. And "Dravidian Race" could still be a section in the article. --] 10:22, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
:The article was originally intended to be about the 19th century concept of a "race". The editor who created it evidently intended it to parallel the ] article. It has now evolved into something different, so yes, ] or ] would be better. The letter currently rediects to ], which is a disambiguation page, and I think should remain so. ] 10:35, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
::If nobody objects, somebody should move the article to Dravidians or Dravidian people then. --] 11:15, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Since consensus was apparently reached here for the move -- but never enacted -- I, random passerby, have completed the move. ] 05:39, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't someone delete the page ] and change all the links to point towards ] since the two pages are identical?... PostEDIT- nevermind, it hanppened even as I was typing.

==The unsortened exerpt version reads==

"Morphologically the people of India may be broadly classified (Malhotra, 1978) into four types --- Negrito, Australoid, Mongoloid and Caucasoid. The Negrito element is characterized by short stature, fizzly hair, fine hair texture, brachycephalichead, dark complexion, short and protruding face, broad nose and thick and everted lips. They are now confined to the Andaman Islands and Nilgiri Hills. Some anthropologists believe that they may have had a wider distribution at one time. The Australoids are characterized by short stature (althoughtaller than the Negritos), wavy to curly hair, hyperdolichocephalic todolichocephalic head, dark complexion, stout brow ridges, sunken nasalroot and abundance of body hair. They are chiefly distributed in central and southern regions of India. The Mongoloid element in India is primarily found in the north-east and the sub-Himalayan regions of India. They have short stature, broad shoulder, scanty facial and body hair, brachycephalic head, flat face, prominent cheek bones, flat nose and epicanthic fold. Mostof the tribal groups of India belong to one of these three fairly distinct morphological types, although it must be emphasized that within any of these types there is a considerable amount of variability. The Caucasoid element in India is the most widespread. They are characterized by a taller stature, dolichocephalic to brachycephalic head, light complexion, straight to wavy hair, lighter eyes, arched forehead, long face with well-developed chin,narrow and prominent nose. ... How are populations from various Indian regions genetically positioned relative to one another? Using the data on allele frequencies at 10 loci presented in Roychoudhury (1977), a single-linkage dendrogram (Figure 2) was constructed. From Figure 2, it is seen that the populations of southern India stand apart genetically from the populations of north, west, east and central India." ] 20:23, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

:Hi, I've removed this passage again because its footnote links to a non-existent page. We need to know who said this and when. ] 21:11, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

==Southern Indian Australoids==
On a purely visual basis, there is a strong similarity between the people of southern India and especially Sri Lanka. Sri Lankans are often mistaken for Aboriginies in Australia. Research has apparently not only found genetic similarities between these people and the Australian Aboriginies, but also close genetic similarities between native dogs in both areas.

The striking visual similarity does not exist with other people from the Indian subcontinent.

If you want to go by genetic studies then majority South Indians show unique haplogroups like L and H, very rarely occuring outside India. So which genetic similarity you are talking about? Which Srilanakans are you talking about? If it's Sinhalese then they exhibit Haplogroup R1A in high frequenc which is supposed to be an Indo-Aryan identifier(still controversial). Phenotypes are not good indicators of similarities. Sinhalese are dark because of geographical reasons.

== Dravidian = Tamil ==

The following passage was taken from the book "Tamil Language - A brief review of its history and features", written by Prof. M. Varadarajan

"The term Dravidian, which refers to the language of South India, is of a later origin. Originally it was derived from the word tamil /tamiz> . This word in course of time changed into dravida after undergoing a series of changes like tamiza, tramiza, tramiTa, trapida and travida. At one time the languages spoken in the regions of Karnataka, Kongu and Malabar were respectively known as Karunaattut-tamil, Tulunattut-tamil and Malainattut-tamil. Today however, these regional languages are classified under the blanket term 'Dravidian family of languages'. "


The language known as Derivada can also be reffered to as Tamil. The Tamil language spoken in the ancient times is not different to the tamil language known today. The old texts can still be read and understood by educated tamilian. The book known as "Tholkaapiam", one of the oldest tamil text still in existance was writen in the ca 300BC - 3000BC (The exact date can not be determined due to lack of evidence) and is accepted as the oldest grammar book in any language. This book can be read and understood by any who has studied tamil. It does not require any special training.

==Telugu -Italian of the East==
I found it's too insulting to a self-respecting Telugite that his language has to be compared to some European language. Being part of Dravidian family of languages, it has its own identity. I suppose such POV identity links are not required for Misplaced Pages.
--] (22 Oct 2005)

== Merging ] into this article ==

The article "Dravidas" appears to be about this same subject (either an alternative spelling or a wrong one). It contains little information that this article does not already have (it does mention the ], which this article apparently does not). I have tagged it to be merged into this one. --] 01:31, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


== Unnecessary efforts In "Dravidians"==
Recently a lot of discussions and corrections are going in this topic.But If view differently, its
not much useful for that topic or interest.In the past there were no records like wikipedia now.If we had such system of records, today we dont need these arguments.
The reason for saying this is, I didn't saw much contraversy in "Aryans".It suppose to be the case.
May Be we can post our input whether towards,or against.But remember to keep the evidences.

For example, 10th planet recently discovered,
Until we get official acceptance, still our textbooks reads " ... 9 planets.)

if we consider "dravidian" as a belief then there will be no question.Untill we get the breakthrough by science we all input our findings / opinions.
] 15:48, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

== Propaganda ==

I'd like to bring to attention the huge amount of negative propaganda that makes up the bulk of scholarly work on anything Dravidian. The founder of the modern Dravidian movement, Bishop Caldwell, did it to try to convert Tamilians to the Protestant faith. The man who excavated the Indus Valley sites, such as Mohenjo-daro, perpetuated the theory that the Aryans conquered the Dravidians of the Indus Valley to illustrate the superiority of a white race as opposed to a black race.

Now that the Indus Valley civilisation has turned out to be one of the greatest of the ancient world (bronze age) the same people are revising their opinions to make it seem as if the Indus Valley Civilisation was Aryan. I don't know the truth exactly, but from the objective evidence, it seems Indus was Dravidian. The great majority of modern Indians also have traces of Dravidian stock, though the Tamilians would be the purest genetically as they retained a separate identity.

All I'm saying is that when I put up my findings from the internet onto this article, I did it so that people would understand some of the legacy of the Dravidians, the Tamils. If you look as I have from outside of India, you find no mention of Tamilian discoveries or achievements in history, though they echo even now in science and mathematics. One of the wonders of the world lies in Tamilnadu, the great temples of southern India, yet the only structure that is ever shown to outsiders, be they Japanese or French, is that of the Taj Mahal. It is saddening that propaganda detracts people from revealing the truth.

{{unsigned|219.89.167.180|] 15:57, 3 November 2005 (UTC)}}

== Worthless Articles ==

This article is of very low quality and seems to be quite biased as well. I looks like it was written by a non tamil or non-dravidian with certain polictial goals. Someone please rewrite it or remove it.

== Hahahahaha ==
"However anthropological evidence suggests that both the creators of the Indus valley civilization and the later Aryan invaders were from the Nordindid race."
This article definitly needs to be removed.
-

What evidence? What is this quote from? And why is the bizarre reference to Madame Blavatsky's ''The Secret Doctrine'' in this article?


==pedomorphous isn't a word==
''and were considered by some authorities as somewhat pedomorphous.'' oy vey... ]


== "Aethiopians of Egypt"? ==

"Greek writers sometimes identified the Aethiopians of Egypt with the Eastern Aethiopians"

"Aethiopians of Egypt" is false, since "Aethiopian" was never used by Greek scholars to refer to the Egyptians, but rather to the people south of them, as well as to the people of South India, while drawing similarities in appearance between the North Indians and the Egyptians, and distinctions between the North Indians/Egyptians and the South Indians/Ethiopians . I will change this.

Latest revision as of 23:23, 23 December 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dravidian peoples article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
Former good article nomineeDravidian peoples was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 6, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconAnthropology Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconEthnic groups Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

WikiProject iconIndia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPakistan Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBangladesh Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
The article falls into the work area of the History workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh
WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:
WikiProject iconLanguages Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDravidian languages (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Dravidian languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dravidian languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Dravidian languagesTemplate:WikiProject Dravidian languagesDravidian languages

To-do list for Dravidian peoples: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2016-03-23


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Expand : add some text to:
    • Religion
    • Art and Architecture
    • Music
    • Martial Art
    • Write about the Dravidian history
      • Origins
      • Distribution
      • Pre-Historical evidence
      • Classical period
      • imperial periods


brahmins are not dravidians

there is a line linking a "tamil brahmin madisar" to the clothing of "dravidian women". there are no links to a tamil brahmin, who follow indo aryan culture, to that of the native dravidian people. adopting a sari does not make them "dravidian". genetic studies also disagree. Temporary 1010 (talk) 18:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is not a place for "ethnic cleansing"; people are generally identified as those speaking a particular language or following a particular culture for generations and identify themselves as belonging to that group; this can even override any genetic analysis. It's just whatever the sources say. Rasnaboy (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Copied and pasted messages don't work buddy, you need to stop pushing your offensive and dominant ideologies on others' who want nothing to do with you. Temporary 1010 (talk) 23:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Sheduled tribes in India

Are all Central Dravidian (Kolami–Parji), North Dravidian (Brahui-Kurukh), Gondi-Kui languages speakers considered as sheduled tribes in India? Kaiyr (talk) 08:15, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Add other South Indian kingdoms architecture to dravidian architecture.

Like Vijayanagaras. Venuvg04 (talk) 06:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Recent changes

@Fylindfotberserk:, @Joshua Jonathan:, @Doug Weller: Can you please review these recent changes: . Thought of restoring User:Fylindfotberserk's version as on 5 April 2024. Checking with others to be doubly sure. Rasnaboy (talk) 06:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

@Rasnaboy: Yeah, I see a lot of unnecessary and WP:OR stuff. It is not a "ethnicity" (supra- or otherwise). It is a collection of ethno-linguistic groups that are tehmselves diverse. You can restore this version and start from there if necessary. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, @Fylindfotberserk:. Done. Rasnaboy (talk) 12:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Glad someone else did it, I'm wiped out. Doug Weller talk 15:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
The same user now appears to engage in edit warring at Tamil Brahmins (, , ) and Iyer (, , ). I've already reverted their edits twice and warned them on their talk page, but they have vowed to continue with their removal of sourced contents. May require admin intervention. Rasnaboy (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

A small mistake in the article

There is a small mistake around in the dravidian peoples#Dravidian identification where John Marshall the United States founding father is mistaken for John Marshall for the archaeologist. Please replace the link with the statesman with the John Marshall (archaeologist). Rewolrats (talk) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for pointing that out. - Arjayay (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: