| Revision as of 20:25, 16 December 2005 editPeter McConaughey (talk | contribs)689 edits This guideline has exactly the same status as the WP:One-revert rule. It is adopted by those editors who agree with it in principle. The guideline tool says that and is consistent with the 1RR← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:43, 17 May 2022 edit undoMichael Bednarek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users84,914 editsm sharper target.Tag: Redirect target changed | ||
| (34 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #redirect ] | |||
| {{guideline}} | |||
| The '''zero-revert rule''' states: | |||
| :"If anyone makes a change that you don't like, don't revert it. Instead, talk about it on the article talk page or on their user talk page. This excludes ]." | |||
| This rule is primarily for teams of contributors who want to avoid edit wars and assume good faith. | |||
| Team members sign up and are initially considered "members in good standing". Upon detecting a rule violation (i.e., reverting anything instead of discussing the revert), any member in good standing may move the name of the violator to the "Suspended" section. The result of a suspension is that the members who are still in good standing obviously continue to trust each other. | |||
| Regaining one's standing is as easy as undoing the revert that merited the suspension and discussing the edit in question. | |||
Latest revision as of 03:43, 17 May 2022
Redirect to: