Misplaced Pages

Talk:Animality studies: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:25, 1 November 2009 editFinell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,207 edits →Requested move: Oppose← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:39, 7 March 2024 edit undoJohnsoniensis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720,824 edits wp 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=stub|
{{WikiProject Zoology}}
{{WikiProject Sociology}} <!-- Automatically added by Qwerfjkl (bot) -->
}}

== Requested move == == Requested move ==


{{polltop}} as non-controversial move. (The user could have moved it if autoconfirmed.) --] <small>(])</small> 03:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
{{movereq|AnimalityStudies}}


] → ] — - --] (]) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Mlundblad ] → ] — - --] (]) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Mlundblad


'''Oppose:''' First, the name is not a real word. According to ] the article should be called '''Animality studies''' (note the separation of words and ] capitalization. Second, there is no evidence that "animality studies" is generally recognized as a field separate from ]; indeed, it appears to represent a non-], and perhaps even a ] viewpoint. Third, the subject is already treated in more depth in the ] article, and is therefore an impermissible ]. Fourth, this proposed article has almost no encyclopedic content. Fifth, this proposed article stands by itself: in has no internal links to other relevant Misplaced Pages articles. For these reasons, if this page were moved to article space in its current state, it would be an immediate candidate for ]. —] ] 11:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC) '''Oppose:''' First, the name is not a real word. According to ] the article should be called '''Animality studies''' (note the separation of words and ] capitalization). Second, there is no evidence that "animality studies" is generally recognized as a field separate from ]; indeed, it appears to represent a non-], and perhaps even a ] viewpoint. Third, the subject is already treated in more depth in the ] article, and is therefore an impermissible ]. Fourth, this proposed article has almost no encyclopedic content. Fifth, this proposed article stands by itself: in has no internal links to other relevant Misplaced Pages articles. For these reasons, if this page were moved to article space in its current state, it would be an immediate candidate for ]. —] ] 11:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
{{pollbottom}}

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091005014056/http://animalitystudies.colostate.edu:80/ to http://animalitystudies.colostate.edu

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 08:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

==Sources found==
I have removed the PROD, but if I attempted to expand and update this myself, I'd mess it up, so I'm instead putting here what I found.
===Books===
* , Fordham UP, 2014
* , Palgrave Macmillan, 2015
* , ed. Lundblad, Edinburgh UP, 2017, {{ISBN|9781474400022}} (also
Possibly also this on "critical animal studies" (an alternative term?):
* , London: Routledge, 2020, {{ISBN|9781003014270}}
===Articles===
* , introduction to ''Species Matters'', De Gruyter, 2011
* , ''Contemporary Literature'' 61.3, Fall 2020
Most of the books are collections of essays; the search turned up others in addition to Lundblad being cited as playing an important role in the field; all of these are reputable academic publishers. ] (]) 09:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

From ], I see we also have ], from which it appears that term is used by those emphasizing animal rights. But I'm leaving that book above since it discusses Animality studies and may be useful for expansion. ] (]) 09:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:39, 7 March 2024

This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAnimals
WikiProject iconAnimality studies is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Animals To-do:


 Here are some Open Tasks :
WikiProject iconSociology
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was as non-controversial move. (The user could have moved it if autoconfirmed.) --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 03:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

User:Mlundblad/animalitystudies → AnimalityStudies — - --Mlundblad (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Mlundblad

Oppose: First, the name is not a real word. According to naming conventions the article should be called Animality studies (note the separation of words and sentence case capitalization). Second, there is no evidence that "animality studies" is generally recognized as a field separate from animal studies; indeed, it appears to represent a non-neutral point of view, and perhaps even a fringe viewpoint. Third, the subject is already treated in more depth in the Animal studies article, and is therefore an impermissible content fork. Fourth, this proposed article has almost no encyclopedic content. Fifth, this proposed article stands by itself: in has no internal links to other relevant Misplaced Pages articles. For these reasons, if this page were moved to article space in its current state, it would be an immediate candidate for deletion. —Finell (Talk) 11:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Animality studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Sources found

I have removed the PROD, but if I attempted to expand and update this myself, I'd mess it up, so I'm instead putting here what I found.

Books

Possibly also this on "critical animal studies" (an alternative term?):

Articles

Most of the books are collections of essays; the search turned up others in addition to Lundblad being cited as playing an important role in the field; all of these are reputable academic publishers. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

From User talk:Mlundblad, I see we also have Critical animal studies, from which it appears that term is used by those emphasizing animal rights. But I'm leaving that book above since it discusses Animality studies and may be useful for expansion. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Categories: