| Revision as of 12:08, 22 December 2005 editDan100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,038 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:12, 11 November 2020 edit undoElli (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators56,735 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Washington Initiative 912.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (216 intermediate revisions by 61 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==AfD nomination of 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000== | |||
| You have good way with words. I like that. {{unsigned|Paeris|00:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)}} | |||
| ]I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 19:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Expanding 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000 == | |||
| :Yes, thank you. ] 00:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Better expand it soon, because posting a notice on the article talk page isn't enough to derail an articles for deletion request. Those requests will usually take about 3-5 days and in the case of an article like this, normally result in deletion. that isn't a crack on the article subject or the creators/editors. It is just how it works. If you have a concrete plan on improving the article (even ONE source from something ] which covers the subject in significant detail is enough) but don't want to update the article right now, put that plan up on the ]. I'm not trying to talk down to you or tell you something you don't already know (as you've got a load of edits under your belt). I'm just trying to suggest a course of action. ] (]) 16:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation == | |||
| ==Martin O'Donnell== | |||
| Jake, | |||
| You mentioned Marty O'Donnell's email address recently. What is it? | |||
| Thanks | |||
| A mediation request has been made by ], and I'm keen to get this sorted out. Can you explain to me the issues you feel you have been having with that user? If you could, please reply on my talk page. Thanks! ] (]) 10:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 02:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Mediation response== | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| First I'd like to thank you both for responding and providing good information for me to work from. I'm going to make a few broad suggestions. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| *Try to add to articles, rather than removing existing material. With ] and ], try and add information without removing text already there. Don't worry if that makes some sections end up larger than others; that happens alot on Misplaced Pages. With time, the other bits will catch up! | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *If something can be said in a ] manner and can be ], it can go in. There should be no arguments over "notability" or the like as that's just not a consideration under Misplaced Pages policy. Basically, if there is a published source for a piece of information, that piece of information should go in (along with a reference to the source). We're ]! | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a disambiguation page which either | |||
| :::*disambiguates only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a ]); | |||
| :::* disambiguates zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or | |||
| :::*is an ] redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function. | |||
| Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Washington+Initiative+912|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-disambig-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (] | ]) 21:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| *]. Obviously both support and criticism for him should be written about, but try to be neutral with your language. contains good information but this part: | |||
| :''In order to criticizes Morgan Spurlock's documentaries several websites have been created by members of the right wing in the United States. Most of these websites have a existing idea that the work of Morgan Spurlock is bad and they have engaged in many of the same kind of activities that they criticize Spurlock for allegedly engaging in.'' | |||
| is poorly written. That's pretty much original research - better just to say ''In order to criticizes Morgan Spurlock's documentaries several websites have been created'' '''period'''. Then the links. | |||
| *Don't check each other's user contributions - that's just asking for trouble. Just keep your eyes on the articles you are concerned about. | |||
| *Try to stay completely unemotional. Just focus on the edits and their validity, and don't discuss anything else such other user's conduct etc. | |||
| *I'd suggest less reverting, as that never ever gets anyone anywhere. Have a look at ]. | |||
| Generally I think only good can come of this - all the articles involved have more information and can be enhanced. | |||
| Please direct your responses to this to my talk page :-) ] (]) 12:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:12, 11 November 2020
AfD nomination of 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000
I have nominated 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Expanding 30 Frames a Second: The WTO in Seattle 2000
Better expand it soon, because posting a notice on the article talk page isn't enough to derail an articles for deletion request. Those requests will usually take about 3-5 days and in the case of an article like this, normally result in deletion. that isn't a crack on the article subject or the creators/editors. It is just how it works. If you have a concrete plan on improving the article (even ONE source from something reliable which covers the subject in significant detail is enough) but don't want to update the article right now, put that plan up on the deletion discussion. I'm not trying to talk down to you or tell you something you don't already know (as you've got a load of edits under your belt). I'm just trying to suggest a course of action. Protonk (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Martin O'Donnell
Jake, You mentioned Marty O'Donnell's email address recently. What is it?
Thanks 75.67.239.158 (talk) 02:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Washington Initiative 912
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Washington Initiative 912 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 21:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)