Misplaced Pages

Peter Hart (historian): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:35, 9 November 2009 editJohn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users214,956 edits ce, trim coatrack← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:36, 23 August 2024 edit undoRandal O'Sullivan (talk | contribs)37 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit 
(231 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Canadian historian}}
{{For|other persons named Peter Hart|Peter Hart (disambiguation)}}
{{Infobox writer <!-- for more information see ] -->

| name = Peter Hart
'''Peter Hart''' (born 11 November 1963) is a ] historian, specialising in modern ] history.
| image =
| caption =
| pseudonym =
| birth_date = 11 November 1963
| occupation = Historian
| death_date = {{Death date and age|2010|07|22|1963|11|11|df=y}}
| birth_place = St. John's, Newfoundland
| death_place = St. John's, Newfoundland
}}
{{about|the Canadian historian of Ireland|the British military historian|Peter Hart (military historian)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}
'''Peter Hart''' (11 November 1963 – 22 July 2010) was a ] historian, specializing in modern ].


==Life== ==Life==
Hart was born and raised in ], ]. He studied for one year at the ] before moving to study at ] in ]. He graduated from there with an Honours ] degree. Subsequently, Hart completed a master's degree in International Relations at ].


Hart was born and raised in ], ]. He studied for one year at the ] before moving to study at ] in ], ]. He graduated from there with an Honours ] degree. Subsequently, Hart completed a Masters degree in International Relations at ]. He then moved to ] to do ] work at ], ]. His thesis was on the ] in ], which was the basis of his first book, "The IRA and its Enemies". After completing his doctorate, Hart accepted a five year teaching and research position at ]. In 2003, having completed this contract, Hart moved back to Canada to take up the position of ] in Irish Studies at the Memorial University of Newfoundland. He is also an associate professor at Memorial University. He then moved to Ireland to do ] work at ]. His thesis was on the ] in ], an epicenter of the ], which was the basis of his first book, ''The IRA and its Enemies'' (1999). After completing his doctorate in 1993, Hart accepted a five-year teaching and research position at ]. In 2003, having completed this contract, Hart moved back to Canada to take up the position of ] in Irish Studies at the Memorial University of Newfoundland. He was also an associate professor at Memorial University.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Professor Peter Hart Memorial Scholarship 2017/2018 |url=https://www.mun.ca/news-articles/the-professor-peter-hart-memorial-scholarship-20172018.php |website=www.mun.ca |access-date=30 December 2021}}</ref>

In the 1990s he developed cancer and underwent a liver transplant - events which permanently affected his health. He suffered a brain haemorrhage early in July 2010 and died on 22 July 2010 in a St. John's hospital at the age of 46.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304001552/http://www.vocm.com/newsarticle.asp?mn=2&id=7865&latest=1 |date=2016-03-04 }}, vocm.com; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref>


==Works== ==Works==
Hart published several books on what he termed the "Irish Revolution" of 1916–1923, arguing that events like the ] (1916), the ] (1920–21) and the ] (1922–23) were parts of a greater whole.<ref>See esp. 'A New Revolutionary History', in ''The I.R.A. at War 1916-1923'' (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 3-29.<!-- publishing info, ISBN needed --></ref>


The first book was published in 1998 entitled ''The IRA and Its Enemies, Violence and Community in Cork, 1916–1923'', being a study of the organisation's social composition and activity in ] during the War of Independence. This book won several awards, including the ] (1998). It attracted significant criticism.<ref name=THES>John Gill, , timeshighereducation.co.uk, 3 July 2008.</ref><ref>Matthew Reisz, , timeshighereducation.co.uk, 24 May 2012.</ref><ref>Justine McCarthy, ''An Uncivil War in Academia'', ''Sunday Times'' (Ireland), 10 June 2012.</ref>
He has written several books to date on what he terms the "]" of 1919-23 (more commonly referred to as the ] 1919-21 and the ] 1922-23).


In 2002 Hart edited ''British Intelligence in Ireland 1920–21: The Final Reports'', a re-print of official British Government reports released to the British Public Records Office that detailed British military and intelligence analysis of policy during the Irish rebellion from 1919–1921.
The first of these books is titled ''The IRA and Its Enemies, Violence and Community in Cork'' (1998), a study of the organisation's social composition and actions of the ] in ] during the War of Independence.<ref> Brian P Murphy and Niall Meehan, ''Troubled History: A 10th anniversary critique of Peter Hart's The IRA and its Enemies'', ] (2008), ISBN 978 1 903497 46 3 Pg.6</ref> This book won three awards, including the ] (1998).<ref> Brian P Murphy osb and Niall Meehan, ''Troubled History: A 10th anniversary critique of Peter Hart's The IRA and its Enemies'', ] (2008), ISBN 978 1 903497 46 3, Pg.5</ref><ref>The Christopher Ewart-Biggs Memorial Prize was created in 1977, in memory of Christopher Ewart-Biggs, British Ambassador to the Republic of Ireland, who was assassinated by the IRA in 1976.</ref>


Hart has since published ''British Intelligence in Ireland 1920-21: the Final Reports'' (2002) and ''The I.R.A. at War 1916-1923'' (Oxford University Press, 2003), a collection of essays on various social, political and military aspects of the IRA in these years. They represent, Hart wrote in the preface, "sixteen years' work on the history of the Irish revolution." Peter Hart’s latest work is a biography of ], titled ''Mick: the real Michael Collins'' (Macmillan, 2006). ''The I.R.A. at War 1916–1923'' (Oxford University Press, 2003), is a collection of essays on various social, political and military aspects of the IRA in these years. The publication represented, Hart wrote in its preface, "sixteen years' work on the history of the Irish revolution."


Hart has also contributed to the volume, ''The Irish Revolution'' (2002)<ref>Joost Augusteijn, ''The Irish Revolution, 1913-1923'', Palgrave Macmillan, 2002. ISBN 0333982258</ref> , which is a collection of articles by various historians of the period. Hart contributed to the volume ''The Irish Revolution'' (2002), a collection of articles by various historians of the period.<ref>Joost Augusteijn, ''The Irish Revolution, 1913–1923'', Palgrave Macmillan, 2002; {{ISBN|0-333-98225-8}}.</ref>

Hart's final published work was a biography of the Irish revolutionary leader ], entitled ''Mick - The Real Michael Collins'' (Macmillan, 2006).


==Review and criticism== ==Review and criticism==
According to the '']'', Hart's work "offers a revisionist version of events that proved highly controversial." <ref name=THES>John Gill, , '']'', 3 July, 2008</ref> However, Hart disputes that he is a "]", calling it "pejorative labelling".<ref name=RIH>Peter Hart, , ''Reviews in History'', retrieved 29 August, 2009</ref> In his review of ''The IRA and its Enemies: Violence and Community in Cork, 1916-1923'', fellow historian John Regan writes "Hart is neither a ] nor a southern ], though the influence of both ideologies can be traced though his work." <ref name=RIH>John Regan, , ''Reviews in History'', retrieved 29 August 2009</ref> '']'' suggested in 2008 that Hart's work "offers a revisionist version of events that proved highly controversial".<ref name=THES/> Hart denied he was a "]", calling the term "pejorative labelling".<ref name=RIHresponse>Peter Hart, , ''Reviews in History'', retrieved 29 August 2009.</ref> In his review of ''The IRA at War, 1916–1923'', John M. Regan wrote in 2004:<blockquote>"Hart is neither a ] nor a southern ], though the influence of both ideologies can be traced through his work. His research on localised and specialised topics subverts orthodoxy, but it is his willingness to embrace it when dealing with general explanations that surprises. His exploration of the plight of Protestants in the Free State illuminates the sectarian underbelly of the revolution that nationalist historiography prefers to ignore. In escalating violence in Cork, Tipperary, or Dublin could Michael Collins, Harry Boland, or Ernie O'Malley be held accountable for raising sectarian tensions in Antrim, Down or Belfast? Was the cost of a southern state the institutionalisation of ethno-religious tensions in a compressed and reactionary northern state? Could revolutionary violence in 1922 and 1968 conceivably be part of one grotesque, protracted process? To accept this argument would, however, be to shatter nationalist icons important to a southern nationalist identity still rooted in its own glorious revolution."<ref name="RIHreview">John Regan, , ''Reviews in History'', retrieved 29 August 2004.</ref></blockquote>


A number of the claims Hart has made in his books have attracted criticism from other historians.<ref name=THES/><ref name=BBC> Diarmaid Fleming, BBC News, 26 November 2004</ref> Some of Hart's published claims attracted criticism from other "historians" and writers,<ref name=THES/><ref name=BBC>Diarmaid Fleming, , BBC News, 26 November 2004.</ref> including two incidents in ''The IRA and its Enemies''. One was the ] of 28 November 1920. Hart challenged the account of commander ] who stated the ] engaged in a false surrender that caused two IRA fatalities, after which Barry refused further surrender calls and ordered a fight to the finish without prisoners. Hart posited this never happened and alleged that Barry ordered the killing of all prisoners.<ref>Tom Barry, ''Guerrilla Days in Ireland'', 1949, pp. 40-46; Peter Hart, ''The IRA and its Enemies'', 1998, pp. 34-35.</ref>


Hart claimed he personally interviewed two anonymous ambush veterans in 1988-89 and listened to recorded interviews with three further unnamed Kilmichael veterans. The recordings (known as 'the Chisholm tapes') were made in 1970 by Father John Chisholm as research for ]'s ''Toward Ireland Free'' (1973).<ref name="southernstar.ie">Niall Meehan,
Hart stands by his work, stating that critics have failed to "engage with the book's larger arguments about the nature of the IRA and the Irish Revolution" <ref name=THES/> and believing they are closed to "a real debate where people concede some things and put forward others or are skeptical about weak points and accept the strong points."<ref name=BBC/>
{{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721130634/http://www.southernstar.ie/article.php?id=846 |date=2011-07-21 }}, southernstar.ie, 5 July 2008.</ref> ], author of ''Tom Barry, IRA Freedom Fighter'' (2003), questioned Hart's claim to have interviewed two Kilmichael veterans in 1988 and 1989, claiming only one, Edward "Ned" Young, was still alive from 1987-89. Ryan reported him too ill to have contributed to Hart's research. This assertion was supported in an affidavit published in 2008 by Ned Young's son, John.<ref>Niall Meehan, Brian Murphy (OSB), , academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref> Ned Young died aged 97 on 13 November 1989. According to Ryan (and 1980s newspaper accounts)<ref>, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref> The second last surviving Kilmichael veteran, Jack O'Sullivan, died in December 1986. However, Hart dated an additional interview with his second anonymous Kilmichael veteran on 19 November 1989, six days after Ned Young died. Hart claimed his interviewee was an unarmed ambush scout, although the last ambush scout, Dan O'Driscoll, reportedly died in 1967. The last dispatch scout, Seán Falvey, died in 1971.<ref>Meda Ryan, ''Tom Barry, IRA Freedom Fighter'', Mercier, p. 69.<!-- ISBN needed --></ref> Hart's earlier 1992 PhD thesis, on which his book is based, did not describe this 19 November 1989 interviewee as an unarmed scout. In his thesis, Hart described touring around the Kilmichael ambush site with this interviewee, a claim withdrawn from the book.<ref>Niall Meehan, , pp. 13-14, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref><ref>Niall Meehan, , Field Day Review 10, 2014.</ref>


Niall Meehan, Head of the Journalism and Media Faculty in ], Dublin, questioned Hart's claims with regard to the "Chisholm tapes", in a review of David Fitzpatrick (ed.), ''Terror in Ireland 1916-1923'' (2012). A chapter on the Kilmichael ambush by Eve Morrison was based partially on access to the tapes. She reported two (not three as Hart stated) Kilmichael veterans recorded in 1970 by Chisholm speaking on the ambush. One of these two was Ned Young. The other recorded interviewee, Jack O'Sullivan, spoke words which were misattributed by Hart to the ambush scout he claimed he interviewed on 19 November 1989. Meehan asserted that "this misattribution... further questions the existence of Hart’s 1988 and 1989 veteran interviews".<ref>David Fitzpatrick (ed.), , p. 7, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref><ref>See also .</ref> The discussion resumed in 2022 with a book on the Kilmichael Ambush, defending Hart, by Eve Morrison, to which Niall Meehan responded.<ref>Eve Morrison, Kilmichael, the Life and Afterlife of an Ambush, Merrion, 2022; .</ref>

The second controversy surrounds the ], in which thirteen Protestant men and boys were shot dead between 27–29 April 1922 during the truce between the IRA and the British forces. Hart wrote of ten of the killings, "these men were shot because they were Protestant".<ref>Hart, ''IRA and its Enemies'', p. 288.</ref> Others point to evidence suggesting that, while the IRA action was unauthorised, the men were targeted due to allegations they were informers, not because of their religion. Again, criticism centered on Hart's use of evidence. In his review of ''The IRA and its Enemies'' (The Month, September–October 1998) Brian Murphy noted Hart's citation of a British intelligence assessment in the Record of the Rebellion in Ireland that "in the south the Protestants and those who supported the Government rarely gave much information because, except by chance, they had not got it to give." Murphy pointed out that Hart had omitted the following sentence: {{blockquote|An exception to this rule was in the Bandon area where there were many Protestant farmers who gave information. Although the Intelligence Officer of the area was exceptionally experienced and although the troops were most active it proved almost impossible to protect those brave men, many of whom were murdered while almost all the remainder suffered grave material loss.<ref>In 'Peter Hart, the Issue of Sources', Brian Murphy (OSB), ''Irish Political Review'' Vol 20, No 7, reproduced in , academia.edu; accessed 12 March 2015.</ref>}}

As the April killings took place in "the Bandon area", Brian Murphy queried apparent suppression of evidence contradicting Hart's conclusion. This has been echoed in further discussion.<ref>Niall Meehan, , academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref><ref>Niall Meehan, , academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref><ref>John M. Regan, </ref><ref>John M. Regan, , academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.</ref><ref>John M Regan, , drb.ie; accessed 11 March 2015. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131109182638/http://www.drb.ie/essays/the-history-of-the-last-atrocity |date=November 9, 2013 }}</ref><ref></ref><ref>John M. Regan, , drb.ie; accessed 11 March 2015. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111101202/http://www.drb.ie/reviews/west-cork-and-the-writing-of-history |date=November 11, 2013 }}</ref><ref>Niall Meehan, </ref><ref></ref>

Hart situated the Dunmanway killings in the context of an enduring culture of violent sectarian animosity which he claimed ultimately led to the "ethnic cleansing" of tens of thousands of southern Irish Protestants in county Cork and across Southern Ireland between 1920 and 1923. Discovery of a hitherto hidden violent sectarian culture culminating in mass expulsions created a plausible context for the Dunmanway killings. However, later research published by Barry Keane and Hart's doctoral supervisor at TCD David Fitzpatrick was unable to corroborate Hart's statistical analysis.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=history ireland |first=Barry |last2=Keane |date=2012 |title=Ethnic cleansing? Protestant decline in West Cork between 1911 and 1926 |url=https://www.historyireland.com/ethnic-cleansing-protestant-decline-in-west-cork-between-1911-and-1926/ |journal=History Ireland |volume=20 |pages=35-38 |via=Open Access}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite journal |last=Fitzpatrick |first=David |date=2013 |title=Protestant depopulation and the Irish Revolution |url= |journal=Irish Historical Studies |volume=152 |issue=8 |pages=643-670 |via=JSTOR}}</ref> In a refereed article published in 2022, John M. Regan identified that coinciding with the revolutionary tumult of 1920-3, all of Hart's datasets identifying a precipitous decline in the southern Protestant population in Southern Ireland were misreported and greatly exaggerated.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Regan |first=John M. |date=2022 |title=“All the nightmare images of ethnic conflict in the twentieth century are here”: Erroneous statistical proofs and the search for ethnic violence in revolutionary Ireland, 1917–1923 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nana.12783 |journal=Nations and Nationalism |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=322-340 |via=Open Access}}</ref> How all of Hart's datasets came to confirm the same erroneous pattern of decline is unknown.

Not quoting the sentence in the British Army's ''Record of the Rebellion in Ireland'' identifying that in Southern Ireland loyalist espionage around Bandon was exceptional, Hart attributed the killing of local Protestant's to the violent sectarian culture he misidentified rather than to the bitter intelligence war waged between the British forces and the IRA. Omitting the one sentence identifying Bandon's exceptionalism ensured the superficial plausibility of Hart's ethnic conflict thesis.

Hart stood by his work, stating that critics have failed to "engage with the book's larger arguments about the nature of the IRA and the Irish Revolution"<ref name=THES/> and believing they are closed to "a real debate where people concede some things and put forward others or are skeptical about weak points and accept the strong points."<ref name=BBC/> In his essay 'A new revolutionary history' Hart wrote "From 1922 on, government in the south would be self-determined". This concept of self-determination was important to the definition of "revolution" Hart employed, which was defined by the transfer of sovereignty from the pre- to the post-revolutionary regime. "What was revolutionary", Hart said about the Irish revolution, "was that Irish people had fought for and won their sovereignty ".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hart |first=Pater |title=The IRA at War 1916-1923 |date=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 |edition=1st |location=Oxford |publication-date=2003 |pages=22}}</ref> Yet Southern Ireland, later the ], and after 1937 ], or Ireland in the English language, did not establish full sovereignty until the enactment of the Republic of Ireland Act (1948). Until the passing of the ] in 1931, the Dáil remained subservient to the imperial parliament at Westminster. Neither did Irish people win their sovereignty who fought for their freedom but found themselves living in Northern Ireland after 1921. The casual equation of the "Irish people" with the southern state and the assumption that in 1922 the new Irish state was sovereign are constructions of southern Irish nationalism, not historical scholarship.

Hart's last known interview, speaking in English, was in a TG4 Irish language programme on Tom Barry, broadcast in January 2011. The programme questioned Hart's use of anonymous sources and other claims.<ref>Emmanuel Keogh, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111001051317/http://www.thepost.ie/story/text/ojmhsnsngb/ |date=2011-10-01 }}, ''Sunday Business Post'', 23 January 2011.</ref> More of the interview was broadcast in December 2022, in a documentary on the April 1922 killings.<ref>Available online, </ref>

In his 2011 book, ''Michael Collins and the Anglo-Irish War: Britain's Failed Counterinsurgency'', author ], a retired U.S. career intelligence officer-turned historian, acknowledged Hart's overall contribution in re-examining standard histories of the period, but concluded that Hart's ] is "problematic". Hittle cited Hart's "overall naivete" about guerrilla warfare, in particular, what he viewed as Hart's underestimation of the importance of certain counterintelligence cases to the outcome of the war, as well as faulty methodologies.<ref>J.B.E. Hittle, ''Michael Collins and the Anglo-Irish War: Britain's Counterinsurgency Failure'', Potomac Books, 2011.<!-- ISBN, page(s) needed --></ref>

Probably due to the degree of controversy Hart had aroused, his entry in the Dictionary of Irish Biography was written, not by a historian specialising in the Irish revolution, but by John Gibney, associate editor, whose specialty is the seventeenth century.<ref name="DIB">{{cite web |last1=Gibney |first1=John |title=Peter Hart |url=https://www.dib.ie/biography/hart-peter-a10179 |website=www.dib.ie |access-date=20 December 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=John Gibney |url=https://www.dib.ie/contributor/gibney-john |website=www.dib.ie |access-date=29 December 2021}}</ref>

Memorial University, Hart's ''alma mater'', has established the Professor Peter Hart Memorial Scholarship in Hart's memory and his papers are located in the University's archives.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Professor Peter Hart Memorial Scholarship |url=https://www.mun.ca/sgs/current-students/searchable-awards-and-scholarship-database/ |access-date=14 August 2024 |website=Memorial University}}</ref>

==Publications==
* ''The I.R.A. & Its Enemies'' (1998)
* ''The I.R.A. at War'' (2003)
* ''Mick - The Real Michael Collins'' (2005)
==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
* at the ]. * at the ].
*
*
* , John Dorney, theirishstory.com
* , Niall Meehan, Field Day Review 10 2014
* , Brian Murphy, Niall Meehan'
* , TV documentary, TG4 (Ireland), 7 December 2022. Includes 2010 interview with Peter Hart.

{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Hart, Peter}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Hart, Peter}}
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]

Latest revision as of 14:36, 23 August 2024

Canadian historian
Peter Hart
Born11 November 1963
St. John's, Newfoundland
Died22 July 2010(2010-07-22) (aged 46)
St. John's, Newfoundland
OccupationHistorian
This article is about the Canadian historian of Ireland. For the British military historian, see Peter Hart (military historian).

Peter Hart (11 November 1963 – 22 July 2010) was a Canadian historian, specializing in modern Irish history.

Life

Hart was born and raised in St. John's, Newfoundland. He studied for one year at the Memorial University of Newfoundland before moving to study at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. He graduated from there with an Honours BA degree. Subsequently, Hart completed a master's degree in International Relations at Yale University.

He then moved to Ireland to do PhD work at Trinity College, Dublin. His thesis was on the Irish Republican Army in County Cork, an epicenter of the Irish War of Independence, which was the basis of his first book, The IRA and its Enemies (1999). After completing his doctorate in 1993, Hart accepted a five-year teaching and research position at Queen's University Belfast. In 2003, having completed this contract, Hart moved back to Canada to take up the position of Canada Research Chair in Irish Studies at the Memorial University of Newfoundland. He was also an associate professor at Memorial University.

In the 1990s he developed cancer and underwent a liver transplant - events which permanently affected his health. He suffered a brain haemorrhage early in July 2010 and died on 22 July 2010 in a St. John's hospital at the age of 46.

Works

Hart published several books on what he termed the "Irish Revolution" of 1916–1923, arguing that events like the Easter Rising (1916), the Irish War of Independence (1920–21) and the Irish Civil War (1922–23) were parts of a greater whole.

The first book was published in 1998 entitled The IRA and Its Enemies, Violence and Community in Cork, 1916–1923, being a study of the organisation's social composition and activity in County Cork during the War of Independence. This book won several awards, including the Christopher Ewart-Biggs Memorial Prize (1998). It attracted significant criticism.

In 2002 Hart edited British Intelligence in Ireland 1920–21: The Final Reports, a re-print of official British Government reports released to the British Public Records Office that detailed British military and intelligence analysis of policy during the Irish rebellion from 1919–1921.

The I.R.A. at War 1916–1923 (Oxford University Press, 2003), is a collection of essays on various social, political and military aspects of the IRA in these years. The publication represented, Hart wrote in its preface, "sixteen years' work on the history of the Irish revolution."

Hart contributed to the volume The Irish Revolution (2002), a collection of articles by various historians of the period.

Hart's final published work was a biography of the Irish revolutionary leader Michael Collins, entitled Mick - The Real Michael Collins (Macmillan, 2006).

Review and criticism

Times Higher Education suggested in 2008 that Hart's work "offers a revisionist version of events that proved highly controversial". Hart denied he was a "revisionist", calling the term "pejorative labelling". In his review of The IRA at War, 1916–1923, John M. Regan wrote in 2004:

"Hart is neither a statist nor a southern nationalist, though the influence of both ideologies can be traced through his work. His research on localised and specialised topics subverts orthodoxy, but it is his willingness to embrace it when dealing with general explanations that surprises. His exploration of the plight of Protestants in the Free State illuminates the sectarian underbelly of the revolution that nationalist historiography prefers to ignore. In escalating violence in Cork, Tipperary, or Dublin could Michael Collins, Harry Boland, or Ernie O'Malley be held accountable for raising sectarian tensions in Antrim, Down or Belfast? Was the cost of a southern state the institutionalisation of ethno-religious tensions in a compressed and reactionary northern state? Could revolutionary violence in 1922 and 1968 conceivably be part of one grotesque, protracted process? To accept this argument would, however, be to shatter nationalist icons important to a southern nationalist identity still rooted in its own glorious revolution."

Some of Hart's published claims attracted criticism from other "historians" and writers, including two incidents in The IRA and its Enemies. One was the Kilmichael Ambush of 28 November 1920. Hart challenged the account of commander Tom Barry who stated the Auxiliaries engaged in a false surrender that caused two IRA fatalities, after which Barry refused further surrender calls and ordered a fight to the finish without prisoners. Hart posited this never happened and alleged that Barry ordered the killing of all prisoners.

Hart claimed he personally interviewed two anonymous ambush veterans in 1988-89 and listened to recorded interviews with three further unnamed Kilmichael veterans. The recordings (known as 'the Chisholm tapes') were made in 1970 by Father John Chisholm as research for Liam Deasy's Toward Ireland Free (1973). Meda Ryan, author of Tom Barry, IRA Freedom Fighter (2003), questioned Hart's claim to have interviewed two Kilmichael veterans in 1988 and 1989, claiming only one, Edward "Ned" Young, was still alive from 1987-89. Ryan reported him too ill to have contributed to Hart's research. This assertion was supported in an affidavit published in 2008 by Ned Young's son, John. Ned Young died aged 97 on 13 November 1989. According to Ryan (and 1980s newspaper accounts) The second last surviving Kilmichael veteran, Jack O'Sullivan, died in December 1986. However, Hart dated an additional interview with his second anonymous Kilmichael veteran on 19 November 1989, six days after Ned Young died. Hart claimed his interviewee was an unarmed ambush scout, although the last ambush scout, Dan O'Driscoll, reportedly died in 1967. The last dispatch scout, Seán Falvey, died in 1971. Hart's earlier 1992 PhD thesis, on which his book is based, did not describe this 19 November 1989 interviewee as an unarmed scout. In his thesis, Hart described touring around the Kilmichael ambush site with this interviewee, a claim withdrawn from the book.

Niall Meehan, Head of the Journalism and Media Faculty in Griffith College, Dublin, questioned Hart's claims with regard to the "Chisholm tapes", in a review of David Fitzpatrick (ed.), Terror in Ireland 1916-1923 (2012). A chapter on the Kilmichael ambush by Eve Morrison was based partially on access to the tapes. She reported two (not three as Hart stated) Kilmichael veterans recorded in 1970 by Chisholm speaking on the ambush. One of these two was Ned Young. The other recorded interviewee, Jack O'Sullivan, spoke words which were misattributed by Hart to the ambush scout he claimed he interviewed on 19 November 1989. Meehan asserted that "this misattribution... further questions the existence of Hart’s 1988 and 1989 veteran interviews". The discussion resumed in 2022 with a book on the Kilmichael Ambush, defending Hart, by Eve Morrison, to which Niall Meehan responded.

The second controversy surrounds the Dunmanway killings, in which thirteen Protestant men and boys were shot dead between 27–29 April 1922 during the truce between the IRA and the British forces. Hart wrote of ten of the killings, "these men were shot because they were Protestant". Others point to evidence suggesting that, while the IRA action was unauthorised, the men were targeted due to allegations they were informers, not because of their religion. Again, criticism centered on Hart's use of evidence. In his review of The IRA and its Enemies (The Month, September–October 1998) Brian Murphy noted Hart's citation of a British intelligence assessment in the Record of the Rebellion in Ireland that "in the south the Protestants and those who supported the Government rarely gave much information because, except by chance, they had not got it to give." Murphy pointed out that Hart had omitted the following sentence:

An exception to this rule was in the Bandon area where there were many Protestant farmers who gave information. Although the Intelligence Officer of the area was exceptionally experienced and although the troops were most active it proved almost impossible to protect those brave men, many of whom were murdered while almost all the remainder suffered grave material loss.

As the April killings took place in "the Bandon area", Brian Murphy queried apparent suppression of evidence contradicting Hart's conclusion. This has been echoed in further discussion.

Hart situated the Dunmanway killings in the context of an enduring culture of violent sectarian animosity which he claimed ultimately led to the "ethnic cleansing" of tens of thousands of southern Irish Protestants in county Cork and across Southern Ireland between 1920 and 1923. Discovery of a hitherto hidden violent sectarian culture culminating in mass expulsions created a plausible context for the Dunmanway killings. However, later research published by Barry Keane and Hart's doctoral supervisor at TCD David Fitzpatrick was unable to corroborate Hart's statistical analysis. In a refereed article published in 2022, John M. Regan identified that coinciding with the revolutionary tumult of 1920-3, all of Hart's datasets identifying a precipitous decline in the southern Protestant population in Southern Ireland were misreported and greatly exaggerated. How all of Hart's datasets came to confirm the same erroneous pattern of decline is unknown.

Not quoting the sentence in the British Army's Record of the Rebellion in Ireland identifying that in Southern Ireland loyalist espionage around Bandon was exceptional, Hart attributed the killing of local Protestant's to the violent sectarian culture he misidentified rather than to the bitter intelligence war waged between the British forces and the IRA. Omitting the one sentence identifying Bandon's exceptionalism ensured the superficial plausibility of Hart's ethnic conflict thesis.

Hart stood by his work, stating that critics have failed to "engage with the book's larger arguments about the nature of the IRA and the Irish Revolution" and believing they are closed to "a real debate where people concede some things and put forward others or are skeptical about weak points and accept the strong points." In his essay 'A new revolutionary history' Hart wrote "From 1922 on, government in the south would be self-determined". This concept of self-determination was important to the definition of "revolution" Hart employed, which was defined by the transfer of sovereignty from the pre- to the post-revolutionary regime. "What was revolutionary", Hart said about the Irish revolution, "was that Irish people had fought for and won their sovereignty ". Yet Southern Ireland, later the Irish Free State, and after 1937 Éire, or Ireland in the English language, did not establish full sovereignty until the enactment of the Republic of Ireland Act (1948). Until the passing of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, the Dáil remained subservient to the imperial parliament at Westminster. Neither did Irish people win their sovereignty who fought for their freedom but found themselves living in Northern Ireland after 1921. The casual equation of the "Irish people" with the southern state and the assumption that in 1922 the new Irish state was sovereign are constructions of southern Irish nationalism, not historical scholarship.

Hart's last known interview, speaking in English, was in a TG4 Irish language programme on Tom Barry, broadcast in January 2011. The programme questioned Hart's use of anonymous sources and other claims. More of the interview was broadcast in December 2022, in a documentary on the April 1922 killings.

In his 2011 book, Michael Collins and the Anglo-Irish War: Britain's Failed Counterinsurgency, author J.B.E. Hittle, a retired U.S. career intelligence officer-turned historian, acknowledged Hart's overall contribution in re-examining standard histories of the period, but concluded that Hart's historical method is "problematic". Hittle cited Hart's "overall naivete" about guerrilla warfare, in particular, what he viewed as Hart's underestimation of the importance of certain counterintelligence cases to the outcome of the war, as well as faulty methodologies.

Probably due to the degree of controversy Hart had aroused, his entry in the Dictionary of Irish Biography was written, not by a historian specialising in the Irish revolution, but by John Gibney, associate editor, whose specialty is the seventeenth century.

Memorial University, Hart's alma mater, has established the Professor Peter Hart Memorial Scholarship in Hart's memory and his papers are located in the University's archives.

Publications

  • The I.R.A. & Its Enemies (1998)
  • The I.R.A. at War (2003)
  • Mick - The Real Michael Collins (2005)

References

  1. "The Professor Peter Hart Memorial Scholarship 2017/2018". www.mun.ca. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  2. Notice of death of Peter Hart Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine, vocm.com; accessed 11 March 2015.
  3. See esp. 'A New Revolutionary History', in The I.R.A. at War 1916-1923 (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 3-29.
  4. ^ John Gill, Troubles and strife as IRA historian draws peers' fire, timeshighereducation.co.uk, 3 July 2008.
  5. Matthew Reisz, Between the lines of a tale of murder and motive, timeshighereducation.co.uk, 24 May 2012.
  6. Justine McCarthy, An Uncivil War in Academia, Sunday Times (Ireland), 10 June 2012.
  7. Joost Augusteijn, The Irish Revolution, 1913–1923, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002; ISBN 0-333-98225-8.
  8. Peter Hart, Author's response: The IRA at War 1916–1923, Reviews in History, retrieved 29 August 2009.
  9. John Regan, Book Review: The IRA at War 1916–1923, Reviews in History, retrieved 29 August 2004.
  10. ^ Diarmaid Fleming, "'War of words' over battle", BBC News, 26 November 2004.
  11. Tom Barry, Guerrilla Days in Ireland, 1949, pp. 40-46; Peter Hart, The IRA and its Enemies, 1998, pp. 34-35.
  12. Niall Meehan, "Kilmichael veteran's son challenges Hart" Archived 2011-07-21 at the Wayback Machine, southernstar.ie, 5 July 2008.
  13. Niall Meehan, Brian Murphy (OSB), "Troubled History - a Tenth Anniversary Critique of Peter Hart's The IRA and its Enemies", academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  14. Niall Meehan, Reply to Jeffrey Dudgeon on Peter Hart, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  15. Meda Ryan, Tom Barry, IRA Freedom Fighter, Mercier, p. 69.
  16. Niall Meehan, "Distorting Irish History: the Stubborn Facts of Kilmichael", pp. 13-14, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  17. Niall Meehan, "Examining Peter Hart", Field Day Review 10, 2014.
  18. David Fitzpatrick (ed.), Terror in Ireland 1916-23 (including responses from David Fitzpatrick and Eve Morrison), p. 7, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  19. See also Reply to Professor David Fitzpatrick and to Dr Eve Morrison's responses to criticism of Terror in Ireland 1916-1923 (plus consideration of Dr Brian Hanley on "The Good Old IRA"), pp. 4-7, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  20. Eve Morrison, Kilmichael, the Life and Afterlife of an Ambush, Merrion, 2022; Niall Meehan, Rehabilitating Peter Hart, Aubane 2022.
  21. Hart, IRA and its Enemies, p. 288.
  22. In 'Peter Hart, the Issue of Sources', Brian Murphy (OSB), Irish Political Review Vol 20, No 7, reproduced in Troubled History, a 10th anniversary critique of Peter Hart's The IRA and its Enemies, academia.edu; accessed 12 March 2015.
  23. Niall Meehan, "Distorting Irish History Two, the road from Dunmanway: Peter Hart's treatment of the 1922 ‘April killings’ in West Cork", academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  24. Niall Meehan, "The Further One Gets From Belfast", a second reply to Jeff Dudgeon, academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  25. John M. Regan, David Fitzpatrick response (plus letters), History Ireland, January-June 2012.
  26. John M. Regan, "The 'Bandon Valley Massacre' as a historical problem", academia.edu; accessed 11 March 2015.
  27. John M Regan, "The History of the Last Atrocity", drb.ie; accessed 11 March 2015. Archived November 9, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  28. Reply to John M. Regan and Eve Morrison
  29. John M. Regan, "West Cork and The Writing of History", drb.ie; accessed 11 March 2015. Archived November 11, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  30. Niall Meehan, Examining Peter Hart, Field Day Review 10, 2014.
  31. Tom Barry, Peter Hart and the Kilmichael Ambush of 28 November 1920 - a 2017 discussion in the Southern Star between Niall Meehan and Eve Morrison (and others on other matters)
  32. history ireland, Barry; Keane (2012). "Ethnic cleansing? Protestant decline in West Cork between 1911 and 1926". History Ireland. 20: 35–38 – via Open Access.
  33. Fitzpatrick, David (2013). "Protestant depopulation and the Irish Revolution". Irish Historical Studies. 152 (8): 643–670 – via JSTOR.
  34. Regan, John M. (2022). ""All the nightmare images of ethnic conflict in the twentieth century are here": Erroneous statistical proofs and the search for ethnic violence in revolutionary Ireland, 1917–1923". Nations and Nationalism. 28 (1): 322–340 – via Open Access.
  35. Hart, Pater (2003). The IRA at War 1916-1923 (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 22.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  36. Emmanuel Keogh, TV Review Archived 2011-10-01 at the Wayback Machine, Sunday Business Post, 23 January 2011.
  37. Available online, Marú in Iarthar Chorcaí, Dir. Gerry O Callaghan, TG4, 12 December 2022
  38. J.B.E. Hittle, Michael Collins and the Anglo-Irish War: Britain's Counterinsurgency Failure, Potomac Books, 2011.
  39. Gibney, John. "Peter Hart". www.dib.ie. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  40. "John Gibney". www.dib.ie. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  41. "The Professor Peter Hart Memorial Scholarship". Memorial University. Retrieved 14 August 2024.

External links

Categories: