| Revision as of 01:22, 17 November 2009 editAnti-Nationalist (talk | contribs)1,619 edits →Was Looveer a Nazi collaborator?: rsp. to T← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 02:20, 18 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,355,172 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Estonia}}, {{WikiProject Australia}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
| (537 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Old AfD multi| date = 23 November 2009 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Lia Looveer }} |
|
{{WPBiography |
|
|
|
|
|
|living=no |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|living=no|listas=Looveer, Lia|1= |
|
|class=Stub |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low|needs-photo=yes}} |
|
|priority= |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Estonia|importance=low}} |
|
|listas= Looveer, Lia |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=Low|NSW=yes|history=yes|politics=yes|politics-importance=low|NSW-importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Women's History}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject Estonia|class=stub|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WP Australia|class=Stub|importance=Low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
regarding ''.'' by Anti-Nationalist. |
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it is a Baltic organization in Australia, not an Australian organization per se. FFI please see the State library of New South Wales: , + Lia Looveer was .--] (]) 05:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] edit warring over category == |
|
|
|
|
|
] thinks the ] is based upon ethnicity, but it is in fact based upon nationality. As far as I know Lia Looveer was a dual Australian/Estonian national. --] (]) 03:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: Actually, I rather expected it might be both, as the "Lists of..." Estonians, Latvian, and Lithuanians include both. ] <small>]]</small> 13:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: ] (whoever might that be?) doesn't think ] is based upon ethnicity, descent, or birth location. He thinks it is based on nationality, here meaning where the person actively participates in politics , although Vecrumba apparently thinks the reverse , Martintg. ;-) If politician categories were classified by ethnicity, ] would be a Dutchman, while ] would be Estonian. ] (]) 20:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Lia Looveer had dual Australian/Estonian nationality, so what is ] arguing about? --] (]) 22:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::He means that she wasn't active in Estonian politics, as he explained. Croatian Prime Minister ] is a dual Croatian-French citizen, but he's not a "French politician" because of it. ] (]) 22:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::´´If politician categories were classified by ethnicity, ] would be a Dutchman, while ] would be Estonian. ] (]) 20:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC)´´ - funny, I never knew ] was Estonian. Ever heard of ]? --] ] 17:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::: He was a Baltic German, born in Estonia. C'mon, Miacek{{ndash}}I never claimed that he was Estonian and wouldn't describe him as one despite his being born in Reval (Tallinn), which is why the analogy was used. That's the whole point: you classify an individual as an "X-ian politician" if said individual is active in politics in country "X." Any other classification, whether by birth or descent, is non-sensical, which is why presenting Theodore Roosevelt as "Dutch politician" and Alfred Rosenberg an Estonian Nazi figure would be a stupid way of classifying people. It's the invalidity of this sort of categorization that I've been illustrating. ] (]) 18:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::I can't see how any of this nonsense about Roosevelt as "Dutch politician" is related to the subject unless Roosevelt was an active member of Dutch political organizations in the US like Looveer was an active member of Estonian political organizations in Australia.--] (]) 00:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Was Looveer a Nazi collaborator? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't she a Nazi collaborator? According to this link , Looveer, worked for Baltic Radio in Nazi Germany, 1944-45. I wonder why her son had no need to hide this sort of thing. I am also wondering if the Australian public was largely aware of this fact. ] (]) 02:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Misplaced Pages describes ] as <blockquote>the treason of cooperating with enemy forces occupying one's country. As such it implies criminal deeds in the service of the occupying power, including complicity with the occupying power in murder, persecutions, pillage, and economic exploitation as well as participation in a puppet government.</blockquote> I don't think a case (one out of thousands) of a Baltic person having fled the country as the Soviet occupants seized the land and then working for some months for a rather unknown German radio warrants the label 'Nazi collaborator'. Similarly, chairmen of minor ]es in the ESSR aren't usually described as Soviet collaborators. --] ] 17:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::I don't know if the station was propaganda or not. Did Nazi Germany seemply broadcast Baltic Radio for the fun of it? Maybe. That's why I asked. And a collaborator is somebody who collaborates with an occupier. Even the initially pro-German Juri Uluots (claiming the mantle of Estonia's legitimate ruler during the Nazi occupation) got his Estonian supporters fighting Germans by 1944, while Lia Loover went to Germany and worked for this mysterious broadcaster in 1944-45, so I think the description seems fitting. Explain? ] (]) 18:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-Nationalist nèe PasswordUsername, please present evidence that "Baltic Radio" was a Nazi radio station and not a Baltic (language, I would presume) radio station operating from Germany. That something operated in Germany during the war does not automatically make that something a Nazi enterprise. Are you here to create content or to smear a dead Estonian? (Per your openly leading question starting as: "<u>'''Wasn't she'''</u> a Nazi collaborator?", your innuendo "wondering" about her son having "no need to hide", "wondering" about the Australian public.) ] <small>]]</small> 17:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Besides that ] is awarded for meritorious civil or military service worthy of recognition by the ]. I'm surprised that PU wasn't "wondering" about the validness of my relative being decorated with that medal. --] ] 17:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:I'm just wondering about this, Vecrumba. Thanks for assuming good faith. ] (]) 18:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: I only observed the manner in which you asked your question. ''Constructively asked questions'' are always taken to be in good faith. Questions asked in the form of accusatory innuendo are not. Enough said on this and elsewhere. ] <small>]]</small> 18:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
Unless it's shown promptly how exactly is this smearing related to a discussion about "improving the article", I'm gong to remove this chapter from the talk page shortly. Thanks for understanding! --] (]) 00:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:It's not smearing: it's a question I'm asking because I'd like to know about Looveer's work in Germany and if there's any further information I might be able to look at. It is a relevant question because I was wondering about adding her to category Nazi collaborators, as she ''prima facie'' appears to have been a real collaborator with the Nazi authorities, even going from Estonia to Germany and then working on what appears to have been a propaganda radio station (I don't think Baltic Radio Germany was broadcast into Estonia in 1944-45 for fun and profit). ] (]) 23:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: As I said, bring something more than your personal interpretation and speculation to the plate. <small style="background:white; border: 1px solid #a12830;"> ] ►] </small> 20:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: Let's see, let's see! Here's my basis for asking a simple question about her: . Aight? You gonna give me a lynching for that? ] (]) 21:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
This is not a speedy candidate as the page was not created to disparage its subject. If you guys come to a consensus that the discussion should be hidden then someone can just blank this section. Deletion is not necessary. <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">]</font><sup>] | ]</sup> 07:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Diller redux == |
|
:Regarding the Baltic radio in Poland and Germany in 1944, there was considerable amount of Baltic war refugees out there at the time and what has their Baltic radio station where Looveer worked according to her resume anything to do with "]" personal speculations here? Misplaced Pages is not a place to publish original research or original thought, so why hasn't this section been deleted yet?--] (]) 23:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
The passage quoted by Pantherskin does not exist in Diller's book. Additionally, per the author's correspondence, his book contains all of one sentence with reference to ''Sendergruppe Ostland'' which included Estonia—and not on pages 405-406. FYI, I've ordered the entire set (of which Diller's is volume 2). ]<small> ►]</small> 02:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
::I want information, not speculation. The file I have twice linked to refers to ]{{ndash}}an official establishment, if we're going by the name of it. I would like more information about this station{{ndash}}such as, for one, whether the station was commandeered and run by one ], as the Nazi state's broadcasting was. From the sound of it, it seems like a Nazi propaganda station, but I would very, very much like more information about this seemingly obscure radio service as I do <u>not</u> want to "publish original research or original thought" or "personal speculations" of any sort here. ] (]) 00:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
What you said above you want is "adding her to category Nazi collaborators". In case you want more information about the radio station, why don't you contact for example the information services of the British crown. They surely must have asked questions about the work at the station in case it was run "by one ]" etc. while considering awarding her with the ].--] (]) 00:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Yes, my question had a practical purpose. I think if she worked for a Nazi propaganda station in '44-45 after moving to Germany, she can be classified as a Nazi collaborator. If you have any numbers for me to call or people to e-mail to find out the nature of her activities, well, help a brother out. By the late '40s, the Australians accepted low-level collaborators into their country, actually. ] (]) 01:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
No kidding...? I would love to help you out just that please explain which part of ] is not clear enough? Hope you don't mind if I spell it out for you: "If you wish to ask a specific question on a topic, Misplaced Pages has a ], and questions should be asked there rather than on talk pages."--] (]) 01:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Huh? I am discussing one of the sources in this article (see my first post in this section), which mentions Looveer's work in Nazi Germany for a station called "Baltic Radio Reichskunfunkt" in 1944-1945. I am wondering about whether such work could serve as evidence of Looveer's working as a Nazi collaborator. I asked a question about what it could mean, since I thought that the article could fit in the Nazi collaborators category, but wanted to be sure first. I am sorry if this came across as an "attack" for you{{ndash}}but how else does one discuss what appears to have been Looveer's Nazi collaboration without actually talking about Nazi collaboration? Discussing the article's content and how it may be more accurately represented is a fully acceptable activity to be carried out on talk pages{{ndash}}per ]. How can I be any more clear about this? ] (]) 16:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::All you have presented is a primary source that mention she worked briefly in Germany then proceed to make ] speculation that it is evidence of Nazi collaboration. Since that you apologize that it came across as an attack, perhaps you could demonstrate that you raised this matter in good faith by allowing the deletion of this discussion, which you have been reverting . --] (]) 17:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::A bloc of nationalist editors reverting repeatedly in order to remove a valid question by somebody else is actually unacceptable. No. ] (]) 18:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
In no place says Looveer's resume "work in Nazi Germany for a station called "Baltic Radio Reichskunfunkt" in 1944-1945" like "] claims. It says "Baltic Radio''',''' Reichskunfunkt, Germany, Thorn, Poland" where the latter are obviously place names. Where is ] in ] is clear, where or what exactly is this Reichskunfunkt (it doesn't mean anything by itself) in Germany remains unclear. The bottom line however suggesting based on this entry on Looveers resume that she may have been a "nazi collaborator" is flat out ridiculous. And labeling other editors with the "nationalist" tag doesn't make the whole thing look more serious, quite the contrary.--] (]) 00:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::That's what I have been asking about, Termer! Thorn belonged to Germany at the time. ] (]) 01:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
The passage quoted by Pantherskin does not exist in Diller's book. Additionally, per the author's correspondence, his book contains all of one sentence with reference to Sendergruppe Ostland which included Estonia—and not on pages 405-406. FYI, I've ordered the entire set (of which Diller's is volume 2). PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 02:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
.svg){kind=logo}
wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
