Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Google Watch (4th nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:58, 4 December 2009 view sourceRMHED (talk | contribs)15,716 edits D & R← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:24, 27 January 2013 view source NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits add drv 
(167 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Delrevafd|date=2009 December 12}}</noinclude>
⚫ ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google_Watch}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Google_Watch}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(] · )</noinclude>
:({{findsources|Google_Watch}})
Non-notable, out-of date, drivel, see the article's talk page (comment at bottom) and . ] (]) 20:40, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
::That it's notable seems to have been confirmed in past deletion discussions - if there are problems with the content, identify and fix them. --] (]) 20:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
:::'''Comment''': What agenda do you have to push, Kotnitski? Remember, this is not the first time you've been hanging around articles relating to Daniel Brandt. ] was you in April 2008, trying to get Daniel Brandt listed on a surname page listing notable people with the last name "Brandt". I see this as an attempt at baiting, and it's obvious that you have an agenda to push regarding this. So, what is it? ] (]) 20:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)


<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
* '''Delete'''. I don't particularly like the precedent we're setting here, but I admit that it's not good to do anything half-assed. (If this comment doesn't make sense to you, it's probably best you avoid this deletion discussion.) --] (]) 20:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
⚫ ===]===
*'''Delete''' there's no real assertion of notability in the article I can see. Yes, it got some passing mentions, but not even enough interest for anyone to be arsed writing a decent article and keeping it up to date.--] 20:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
''The result was '''Merge''' to ]. The actual discussion has been ] but can still be accessed by following the "history" link at the top of the page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). <span style="color:red">'''No further edits should be made to this page.'''</span>''. {{NOINDEX}}<!-- inserted using Template:afd-privacy --></div>
*'''Delete & redirect''' to ] where this is largely already covered. ] (]) 20:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:24, 27 January 2013

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 December 12.
For an explanation of the process, see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review.

Google Watch

The result was Merge to Criticism of Google. The actual discussion has been hidden from view for privacy reasons but can still be accessed by following the "history" link at the top of the page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.. Category: