Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject The Beatles: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:18, 18 December 2009 editHeadbomb (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors453,832 edits WP:Books/Beatles vs. WP:Books/The Beatles: double poust← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:47, 25 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,583 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Archive 10) (bot 
(950 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header|wp=yes|WT:BEATLES|WT:Beatles|WT:TB|noarchive=yes}}
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject The Beatles/Navigation}}
{{Notice|Consensus per and is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence.}}
{{WikiProject talkheader|WT:BEATLES|WT:Beatles|WT:TB|noarchive=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WPBeatles}}
{{WikiProject The Beatles}}
{{werdnabot|age=90|inc_cur=6|archivesize=200|archivelist=no|showheader=yes}}
}}
{{TOCleft}}
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; ">
{{archive box|search=yes| {{archive box|search=yes|
#] #]
#] #]
#] #]
#] #]
#] #]
#] #]
#]
#]
#]
#]
}} }}
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject The Beatles/Navigation}}
</div>
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{-}}
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
== GA reassessment of ] ==
|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 10
I have reassessed the above article and found a few concerns which are at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 16:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
|minthreadsleft = 2

|minthreadstoarchive = 1
:Fixed.--] (]) 16:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
|algo = old(300d)

|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Archive %(counter)d
== Genre Changes ==
}}

Hi everyone. I recently started to edit here, and I've noticed that there's been a lot of contention over the genre(s) listed in the infobox for The Beatles, various songs and albums, and also the members of the band. You're probably all aware of this, but this page may be a good place for a centralized discussion of the issue. ] 15:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

== GA reassessment of ] ==

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the ]. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at ]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. ] (]) 00:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:You should read his review and spot the awful spelling mistakes.--] (]) 07:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I have cleaned it it and have nominated it again.--] (]) 09:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

== Archive Bots ==

I'm upset with whomever decided to make use to the archive bots to archive the talk pages, both here and at ]. Strangely, ''they're not even the same bots''! Either way, though, the bots do incremental archiving, which just makes things really hard to follow because they don't do it in any logical grouping. They simply wait for some threads to get old or some archive pages to get to a certain size threshold, and then they just archive random bits. Because it's an automated system, it makes mistakes when guessing where one section starts, and another one begins. And, as if that weren't bad enough, at least one of the bots went back and "consolidated" the archives that I had done by hand. This just screws up the history even more.

I don't know what to propose to make things better, as it would be quite a burden to go back and fix things by hand. I know how tedious it is to do it by hand, and I know that I'm obviously not always around to do it, but I am here to express my disdain for the new status quo. <span style="font-size: 110%;">&mdash;''']'''&rarr;<span style="font-size: larger;">]</span></span> 21:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

:Those considering this question may wish to take into account bot problem that occurred today. Some manual archiving is said to be needed in relation to certain page content. ] (]) 15:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

== Apple Records discography ==


__TOC__
I notice the ] is listed here as requiring a cleanup. I recently did a complete revamp of the article and would be interested to know what the WikiProject members think about it. Can anymore be done to improve it? Would be interested to know what your thoughts are. ]</span></span> 00:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


== Current events portal == == Yoko and John's children ==


Hi, I hope this is not an insensitive thing to bring up, but should we maybe mention that Ono and Lennon named and registered their dead sons in 1968 and 1969? Her article refer to one miscarriage in 1968 but technically speaking this child would have been stillborn (or according to by ] the boy actually lived for a little while, not sure where he's getting that info from tho). John's article mentions three miscarriages but the boy miscarried or stillborn in 1969 seems to have been . ] (]) 19:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I've added a note the to the ]. It may need to be spruced up with more direct wikilinks or better verbiage or sources. <span style="font-size: 110%;">&mdash;''']'''&rarr;<span style="font-size: larger;">]</span></span> 18:08, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


== Peter and Gordon discography ==
==No controversy over omitted material in the Mono set?==
I posted the following at ] and am cross-posting it here, too: Considering the costs of the box sets, I'm surprised there's no controversy over the fact the Mono set omits the DVD bonus, as well as the remaining albums. Stereo or mono notwithstanding, it forces people to spend hundreds more if they want a complete canon, or having to deal with the stereo versions and skip this one if they want the full set plus the DVD. (I know when the boxes were announced I assumed the Mono set would include the mono mixes ''where applicable'' both otherwise be complete; when I found out otherwise I didn't bother buying either set). And in some places - Amazon.com for certain - the mono set is more expensive. Hasn't there been any criticism as to how this was handled? If so, it should be noted. On a related note, I have heard anecdotally that the Beatles releases are being called the last hurrah for the CD format. This too needs to be included in both this article and the Stereo set article, if a source can be located, of course. ] (]) 15:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


Should ] be put under this project, given that some of the singles are Beatles-related? ] (]) 17:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
== Side selections ==


:No. Even then this WikiProject as a whole is practically dead so it wouldn't matter much anyways. – ''']''' <sub>(]) (])</sub> 18:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Someone is screwing up the side selections for the individual Beatle albums. For example with ] an editor insists on making the first track of side two selection 7 when it obviously should be selection 1. I have never seen a side two label which lists the first track as number 7. Please monitor the album articles to make sure each side begins with track one. ] (]) 16:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
::If it’s dead should we add a semi-inactive/inactive template? ] (]) 18:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
:I think it may be the CD issues that are causing someone to think this change should be made, as CDs of course don't have two sides. A quick glance at my old 1987 ''Sgt. Pepper'' shows tracks 1-13, and ''Revolver'' shows tracks 1-14. Perhaps some kind of note (or hidden comment) should be made in the articles, explaining that the side selections relate to the vinyl originally issued. ] (]) 17:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
::I'd gladly use this page if anyone else is still interested.] (]) 06:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
:::I do think there’s still a lot to be done. A couple years ago we tried to get all the albums to GA/FA but it fizzled out due to lack of motivation. ] (]) 13:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Bummer. I'm not so familiar with album articles but I do like to do work on biographies.] (]) 07:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
== Someone is trying to make MMT an original British LP. ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] ] 13:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)


== Rename "The Beatles' 1964 tour of Australia" to “The Beatles 1964 tour of Australasia" ==
Despite a warning given to ], he is still counting ] as an original British LP. Please monitor the individual British Beatle album articles to make sure he does not correct the album numbering sequence again. ] (]) 11:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


I propose that the article ] be renamed to “The Beatles 1964 tour of Australasia’’ as the “Down Under” tour zig-zagged across the Tasman from Sydney to Wellington, Auckland, Dunedin and Christchurch then back to Brisbane, so it is artificial to have a gap in the middle.
The tour was one of many arranged jointly by Kerridge-Odeon in Auckland and Aztec in Melbourne through their London agent Cyril Berlin of The Grade Organisation ] (]) ] (]) 00:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)


:I'm not familiar with the naming convention of tours, does this tour have a common name?] (]) 13:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
==] GA Review==
The article has been assessed for GA status and simply needs the lead expanding to meet the requirements in ], and some additional background information to explain more fully the presence of The Beatles in Hamburg. I am putting the article on hold for seven days to allow this to be done. The nominator and main contributor has not logged Misplaced Pages since 16 September. If I get time I will do the work myself, but I am currently quite busy on and off wiki, and any assistance would be welcome. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 12:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
:The work has been done and the article is now a Good Article. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 12:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


:The 2024 blockbuster 307p book on the tour calls it The Beatles Australasian Tour 1964 book! ] (]) 23:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
== The Maharishi and The Beatles ==


==]==
] has about 200 words devoted to the relationship between the group and ]. the Maharishi's article has about 400 words on the topic. The McCartney article has a 160-word section. Lennon has a few lines adding up to about 75 words. Harrison has an 18-word sentence. No mention at all on the Starr article. My impression is that, with each of these articles, more could be said but the coverage is limited by weight considerations. If there was a standalone article it could be more like 500-1000 words. It's a fairly discrete topic and well-covered in sources, so it could be suitable for an article. Thoughts? &nbsp; <b>]&nbsp; ]&nbsp; </b> 12:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
The move request is to change the word 'Her' to 'a'. This Wikiproject probably should have been notified earlier. ] (]) 01:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)


== Need eyes at ] ==
== A new edit war. ==


There is an IP edit warring to introduce content that I believe fails ]. I've tried discussing at their talk page and also have ] about the matter. They seem unwilling to discuss further. I do not want to edit war over this (at least any more than has already occurred) and am ] so am requesting more eyes on this article. --Chris &#124; <small>] (])</small> 23:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
] is edit warring concerning content he is trying to change in the ] by removing critical details essential to the article about the songs in this compilation double album. Please investigate. ] (]) 14:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Crazycomputers}} Are they still at it?] (]) 10:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|StarTrekker}} They've replaced the Facebook source with a book, so both yes and no. The source ostensibly passes RS now, and sourcing was my only real objection to the addition before. --Chris &#124; <small>] (])</small> 22:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)


== Requested move at ] ==
== ] vs. ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 19:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
Currently these seem to be overlapping and the scope of these article collections are ill-defined. Should one be merged with the other? ]&nbsp;{<sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">]</sub>&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;]} 05:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:47, 25 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject The Beatles and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Shortcuts
Consensus per this RfC closure and this RfM closure is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence.
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconThe Beatles
WikiProject iconThis Beatles-related page is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Misplaced Pages. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles
To-do list:
For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Archives
  1. Mar 2006
  2. Apr 2006 – Jul 2006
  3. Aug 2006 – Dec 2006
  4. Jan 2007 – Apr 2007
  5. May 2007 – Jul 2008
  6. Aug 2008 – May 2010
  7. May 2010 – Jul 2012
  8. Jul 2012 – May 2018
  9. Nov 2018 – Dec 2021
  10. Apr 2022 – Nov 2022


This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.
WikiProject
The Beatles
General information
Main project page talk
Project log talk
Style talk
Tasks
To do list talk
Red links talk
Missing articles talk
Assessments talk
Outreach
Outreach talk
Newsletter talk
The Beatles history talk


Tools and info
COTM talk
Categories talk
Newsletter talk
Peer review talk
Handy infoboxes
Infobox musical artist talk
Infobox person talk
Infobox album talk
Infobox song talk
Project templates
Project banner talk
Invite user talk
Userbox talk
Userbox 2 talk
Article navbox talk
Singles navbox talk
Barnstar talk
edit · changes

Yoko and John's children

Hi, I hope this is not an insensitive thing to bring up, but should we maybe mention that Ono and Lennon named and registered their dead sons in 1968 and 1969? Her article refer to one miscarriage in 1968 but technically speaking this child would have been stillborn (or according to this book by Tim Riley the boy actually lived for a little while, not sure where he's getting that info from tho). John's article mentions three miscarriages but the boy miscarried or stillborn in 1969 seems to have been registered and named as well. ★Trekker (talk) 19:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Peter and Gordon discography

Should the page be put under this project, given that some of the singles are Beatles-related? Blueskiesdry (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

No. Even then this WikiProject as a whole is practically dead so it wouldn't matter much anyways. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
If it’s dead should we add a semi-inactive/inactive template? Blueskiesdry (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd gladly use this page if anyone else is still interested.★Trekker (talk) 06:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
I do think there’s still a lot to be done. A couple years ago we tried to get all the albums to GA/FA but it fizzled out due to lack of motivation. Blueskiesdry (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Bummer. I'm not so familiar with album articles but I do like to do work on biographies.★Trekker (talk) 07:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for A Hard Day's Night (film)

A Hard Day's Night (film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 13:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Rename "The Beatles' 1964 tour of Australia" to “The Beatles 1964 tour of Australasia"

I propose that the article The Beatles' 1964 tour of Australia be renamed to “The Beatles 1964 tour of Australasia’’ as the “Down Under” tour zig-zagged across the Tasman from Sydney to Wellington, Auckland, Dunedin and Christchurch then back to Brisbane, so it is artificial to have a gap in the middle.

The tour was one of many arranged jointly by Kerridge-Odeon in Auckland and Aztec in Melbourne through their London agent Cyril Berlin of The Grade Organisation Hugo999 (talk) Hugo999 (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with the naming convention of tours, does this tour have a common name?★Trekker (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
The 2024 blockbuster 307p book on the tour calls it The Beatles Australasian Tour 1964 book! Hugo999 (talk) 23:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Don't Worry Kyoko (Mummy's Only Looking for Her Hand in the Snow)#Requested move 24 October 2024

The move request is to change the word 'Her' to 'a'. This Wikiproject probably should have been notified earlier. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Need eyes at The Best of George Harrison

There is an IP edit warring to introduce content that I believe fails WP:RS. I've tried discussing at their talk page and also have started a section on the article's talk page about the matter. They seem unwilling to discuss further. I do not want to edit war over this (at least any more than has already occurred) and am involved so am requesting more eyes on this article. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

@Crazycomputers: Are they still at it?★Trekker (talk) 10:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
@StarTrekker: They've replaced the Facebook source with a book, so both yes and no. The source ostensibly passes RS now, and sourcing was my only real objection to the addition before. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Don't Worry Kyoko (Mummy's Only Looking for Her Hand in the Snow)#Requested move 24 October 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Don't Worry Kyoko (Mummy's Only Looking for Her Hand in the Snow)#Requested move 24 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 19:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song)

Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: