Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:51, 20 December 2009 editDRosin (talk | contribs)312 edits →CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:15, 5 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ''']''' (]) 08:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}


:{{la|CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} ) :{{la|CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} )
Line 6: Line 12:
Contested PROD; reason was: violation of ] and ]. ]—<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 05:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC) Contested PROD; reason was: violation of ] and ]. ]—<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 05:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. This is not a legitimate POV fork as would be the case if the "Criticism" section of ] had gotten too long and had to be spun off. This could theoretically be proper subject matter for an article, but (1) not ''this'' article, and (2) not done this way. --] (]) 07:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. This is not a legitimate POV fork as would be the case if the "Criticism" section of ] had gotten too long and had to be spun off. This could theoretically be proper subject matter for an article, but (1) not ''this'' article, and (2) not done this way. --] (]) 07:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as a personal essay. ] | ] 14:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as a personal essay. ] | ] 14:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
*Delete. should have been a speedy deletion imo. I mean, the name is in full caps to start with.. --] (]) 15:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC) *Delete. should have been a speedy deletion imo. I mean, the name is in full caps to start with.. --] (]) 15:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': An essay. ] (]) 16:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''': An essay. ] (]) 16:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': Misplaced Pages is ]. ]<sup>]</sup><small>]</small> 19:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''': Misplaced Pages is ]. ]<sup>]</sup><small>]</small> 19:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Weird article, delete as per above ] (]) 21:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Weird article, delete as per above ] (]) 21:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Essay. Bye. ] (]) 08:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Nothing but an essay. Should be a snow closure. ] (]) 22:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Looks like someone's notes. We're not here to be a freebie web-host. ]] 22:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 21:15, 5 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE

CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; reason was: violation of WP:NOT#ESSAY and WP:NPOV. Nick—/Contribs 05:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.