Misplaced Pages

Anti-Romanian sentiment: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:40, 31 December 2005 edit200.32.101.54 (talk) rv edits← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:52, 24 December 2024 edit undoFluyt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users748 editsmNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(784 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Hostility toward or prejudice against Romanians}}
Historically, '''anti-Romanian discrimination''' has been present in the policies of countries bordering ] towards the ] population or minorities residing in these countries. The term is also known as "'''Românofobia'''" ('''Romanophobia''') in the ].
{{Distinguish|Anti-Romani sentiment}}
{{multiple issues|
{{More citations needed|date=May 2014}}
{{Disputed|date=May 2014}}
}}
{{Discrimination sidebar|expand-ethnic=yes}}
'''Anti-Romanian sentiment''', also known as '''Romanophobia'''<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AXUVAQAAIAAJ&q=%22romanian-phobia%22|title=Human Rights at the Turn of New Millenium in the Republic of Moldova|via=google.ro|access-date=25 January 2015|isbn=9789975964500|year=2001|publisher=Moldovan Helsinki Committee for Human Rights }}</ref> ({{langx|ro|antiromânism}},<ref>The word ''antiromânism'' is sometimes written without diacritics, and can be a cause of some confusion, because ''antiromanism'' can also mean ''antiţiganism'' (discrimination and prejudice against the ]).</ref> ''românofobie'') is hostility, hatred towards, or prejudice against ] as an ethnic, linguistic, religious, or perceived ethnic group, and it can range from personal feelings of hatred to institutionalized, violent persecution.


To varying degrees, anti-Romanian discrimination and sentiment have both been present among the populations and governments of nations which border ], either towards Romania itself or towards Romanian ethnic minorities which have resided in these countries. Similar patterns have also existed towards other ethnic groups, both in the region and elsewhere in the world, especially where political borders do not coincide with the patterns of ethnic populations.
'''Anti-Romanian''' (alternatively spelled '''antiromanism''') is hostility toward or prejudice against Romanians as a religious, ethnic, or racial group, which can range from individual hatred to institutionalized, violent persecution.


== By country ==
==] and ]==


===Kingdom of Hungary and the Habsburg Monarchy===
The ] population of ] was never directly represented in the ] which consisted of ], ] and ] nobles (the ]), despite the fact that the three groups were minorities, whilst the Romanians comprised an overwhelming majority of the Transylvanian population. Moreover, in ] times, the Romanians were not allowed to reside within the walls of some Transylvanian cities such as ] or ]. This led to extensive persecution against the under-represented Romanians. For example, in the ] Transylvanian laws of justice separated the rights of the Hungarians and Saxons from the rights of the Romanians.


] in the ] was organized according to the system of ], which were privileged groups (''universitates'') with power and influence in socio-economic and political life, being nonetheless organized according to certain ethnic criteria as well. The first Estate was the lay and ecclesiastic aristocracy, ethnically heterogeneous, but undergoing a process of homogenization around its ] nucleus.{{sfn|Georgescu|1991|pp=40-58}} The other Estates were ], ], and ] (or ] – '']''), all with an ethnic and ethno-linguistic basis (''Universis nobilibus, Saxonibus, Syculis et Olachis''). The general assembly (''congregatio generalis'') of the four Estates had mainly supra-legislative powers in Transylvania, but it sometimes took measures regarding order in the country, relationships between the privileged, military issues, etc.{{sfn|Pop|Nägler|Bărbulescu|Dörner|2003|pp=233-}}
As a consequence, Romanian peasants would sometimes revolt and demand better treatment. These revolts, such as the 1784 Romanian peasant-uprising, would be ruthlessly suppressed and would be met by horrible cruelty on the part by the Hungarian nobles who would execute peasant leaders and their admirers by ]. This method of execution consisted of the victim being laid on the ground whilst the executioner would break the prisoner’s bones with a spiked wheel. Other peasants would be forced to watch the executions in order to frighten them from attempting future uprisings.


The turning point in the history of the Romanian population in Transylvania was in 1366, when through the ] ] redefined nobility in terms of membership in the ], thus specifically excluding the ] Romanians.{{sfn|Georgescu|1991|p=63}}
After Transylvania became part of Hungary in ], a policy of assimilation (see ]) of the minorities was employed by the Hungarian authorities and one of its major targets was the Romanian population of Transylvania.


Gradually, after 1366, Romanians lost their status as an Estate and were excluded from Transylvania's assemblies. This meant that the Romanian population of Transylvania was never directly represented in the Transylvanian ], which consisted of Hungarian nobles, German and Székely nobles (the ]).{{sfn|Georgescu|1991|pp=41-59}}
The Romanian national movement lead to the ] ], a document sent by the leaders of the Transylvanian Romanians to the Austrian Emperor which asked for Romanians equal national rights with the Hungarians and demanding the cease the persecutions and the attempts of denationalization of the Romanians. The memorandum was turned down and the leaders of the movement were sentenced to prison for "homeland betrayal".


In the 16th century, Transylvanian laws of justice separated the rights of Hungarians, Saxons, and Székelys from the rights of the Romanians, while Eastern Orthodox became a tolerated religion (opposed to the four privileged religions – Catholicism, Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Unitariasm).{{sfn|Georgescu|1991|pp=41-59}}
==] and ]==


During the ] rule of Transylvania, in order to escape their inferior status, and in correlation with the Austrian interest to strengthen Catholicism, the Romanian Orthodox accepted a proposal for a "church union" (accepting Catholic dogma and retaining Orthodox ritual and calendar), but the other privileged nations objected and the status of the Romanians remained eventually unchanged.{{sfn|Georgescu|1991|pp=43-61, 88-106}}


As a consequence, Romanian peasants would sometimes revolt and demand better treatment. These revolts – even if the initial causes did not have ethnic grounds or shared the fate of the whole peasantry – were firmly suppressed such as the ], in which ], after learning of the escalated situation, ordered the army to intervene. The three leaders were caught by treason in their hiding places and handed over to General ]. Horea and Cloșca were executed by ], while Crișan hanged himself in prison before the execution.<ref name=HegyesMarczali>Hegyes András - Marczali Henrik: Erdély története (Budapest, 2002) 141-147 o. {{ISBN|9639452297}}</ref>
At the end of XIX century – at the beginning of XX century "] saw an intense process of ]". Were closed some hundreds of Moldavian churches, and all Romanian books from these churches were burned. Military service became a new instrument of ].


In December 1918, after the ], the ] was declared at ] by ] of the delegates of ethnic Romanians in Transylvania. Following the ] of 1919 and the ] of 1920, eventually Transylvania became part of Romania.
Following ] being annexed in ] by ], a period of autonomy followed after which all Romanian government institutions, schools and press were closed down and replaced by a ]n style provincial administration. ] was implemented to the point where church services were performed in ] as opposed to ].


===Russia===
After the ], Bessarabia was reunited with Romania for a brief period until ] when the ] re-annexed the territory as well as ]. It is reported that over 12,000 Bukovinian-Romanians were deported to ] in the year 1940 alone. The ] action culminated at the ] when 5,000 to 12,000 Romanian refugees who were attempting to leave Bukovina for Romania were cought by Russian border troops and executed at a place called "Fântâna Albă" (''White Fountain'') in the Romanian language. This policy resulted in a substantial shrinkage of the Romanian element in the province. By 1941 out of 250,000 Romanians in Bukovina, only 192,000 were left.
====Russian Empire====


] became part of the ] under the 1812 ]. <!---DO NOT USE ANNEXATION HERE! One cannot "annex" through the treaty. Read ]---> A period of autonomy followed, but in 1828 all Romanian government institutions, schools and presses were closed and replaced by a ]n-style provincial administration. At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, Bessarabia saw an intense process of ]. Military service also became a new instrument of Russification. The process of ] and ] of this territory started to be carried out by representatives of other ethnic groups of the Russian Empire, including ]s, ], ], ], and ].{{fact|date=January 2021}}
The territory of the ] was composed of ] (except the Southern Basarabia assigned to ]) and a part of the territory of the former ] (]), founded in 1924 within the territory of Ukraine as a bridge head to strengthen the communist ideology expansion in ] and, especially, in Basarabia. In the document confirming the establishment of the Autonomous Soviet Socialist Moldovan Republic (ASSMR) of 12 October 1924 the West frontier of this pseudo-state was traced out not along the Dniester River but the ] River. In the ] the ideology of the anti-Romanian Moldovanism had been consistently and strictly applied. It was tried even to introduce a “]” ], non-Romanian and totally artificial alleged to be “of a Slavonic origin” that was different from the Romanian language by its grotesque primitivism, in the Russian alphabet and abundant in Russisms. Attempts to restore the Latin alphabet in the 30s ended up with the physical extermination of the small number of intellectuals who were forced by the totalitarian regime to serve the ] ideology. Another historical event which contributed to the future implementation of the ] feelings constituted Romania’s behaviour in the ].
* Russian census 1817: 86% Romanians
* Russian census 1856: 74% Romanians
* Russian census 1897: 56% Romanians


====Soviet Union====
In ] the ] government, pursued a policy of denationalization of the native Romanian population, firstly by dividing the province in a "Moldovan" Socialist Republic and a southern region known as ] which was renamed Izmail oblast and annexed to the Ukrainian SSR. Elite elements of the Romanian population were then deported to Siberia much like their Bukovinian counterparts. Russian and Ukrainian settlers were used to fill the vacant areas caused by the deportation of Romanian deportees. The language was renamed ] and the ] script was introduced. Romanians who continued to identify themselves as Romanians and not Moldovans were severely punished by the ] regime.
When the Russian Empire collapsed after the ], a local body called "{{Lang|ro|]}}" ("Council of the Country") was created in Bessarabia. Moldova became an independent republic on December 2, 1917. Given that Soviet raids already menaced the newly formed authority, the local body ("Sfatul Țării") called in support troops from the ]. The troops entered ] on December 13. On March 27, 1918, Sfatul Țării voted to unite with ]. Subsequently, the Soviet Union refused to recognize the union, and supported an intense propaganda campaign stating that the Kingdom of Romania was an ] state.{{fact|date=January 2021}}


Bessarabia was a part of Romania until June 1940, when the ] re-annexed the territory as well as Northern ], after delivering an ultimatum that threatened the use of force (see ]).
The autonomy of ] and the local legislation were eliminated already in ]. The process of russification and colonization of this territory started to be carried out by representatives of other ethnic groups of the ]. When the ]ire, as a result of the coup d’etat organised by ] in ] 1917, practically collapsed, in Basarabia the representative local body called “Sfatul Tarii” was created. In conditions of a total chaos and of the civil war on the territory of the former Russian Empire, on 27 March 1918, “Sfatul Tarii” adopted the decision to unify Basarabia with ].


The evidence of direct anti-Romanian actions undertaken by the ] in the 1920s is abundant. The convention of October 28, 1920, whereby the ], ], ], and ] recognized Romanian sovereignty in Bessarabia, was rejected as invalid by the USSR. Moscow even denied the validity of that part of the convention that stipulated that, upon Russian request, the Council of the League of Nations could be empowered to arbitrate the Russo-Romanian dispute over Bessarabia. In short, the Kremlin insisted that Romania was illegally occupying Bessarabia. And it was because of this intransigent attitude that the ] refused to make any concessions. Romania's attempts, in the early 1920s, to seek accommodation with the USSR on all issues except the Bessarabian fell on deaf ears as the ] encouraged revolutionary activities by Bolshevik elements in ]. The establishment in October, 1924, of the ] as a focal point for eventual reincorporation of Bessarabia into the USSR indeed eliminated the possibility of peaceful resolution of Russo-Romanian differences. The convention of October 28, 1920, whereby the ], ], ], and ] recognized Romanian sovereignty in Bessarabia, was rejected as invalid by the USSR. The ] even denied the validity of that part of the convention that stipulated that, upon Soviet request, the Council of the League of Nations could be empowered to arbitrate the Soviet-Romanian dispute over Bessarabia. In short, the ] insisted that Romania was illegally occupying Bessarabia. Moscow also encouraged revolutionary activities by ] elements in Bessarabia.{{fact|date=January 2021}}


The exact position of the ] on these issues is unknown except for Moscow's unwillingness to make any concessions to ] on Bessarabian issues. Recent tracts by Romanian historians have emphasized the support given by ] Communists to the "democratic forces" opposed to alteration of the status quo in ] in 1938 and subsequent years. True as this may be, there has been no evidence presented in support of any fundamental change in Moscow's traditional anti-Romanian positions with respect to Bessarabia in 1938 and subsequent years. The exact position of the USSR on these issues is unknown except for Moscow's unwillingness to make any concessions to the ] on Bessarabian issues. Recent tracts by Romanian historians have emphasized the support given by ] to the "democratic forces" opposed to alteration of the status quo in ] in 1938 and subsequent years. True as this may be, there has been no evidence presented in support of any fundamental change in Moscow's positions with respect to Bessarabia in 1938 and subsequent years.{{fact|date=January 2021}}


According to official ] documents, over 15,000 Romanians from Northern Bukovina were deported to ] in 1940 alone.<ref>{{in lang|ro}} Gabriel Gherasim, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071006123106/http://noinu.rdscj.ro/article.php?articleID=149&document=3 |date=2007-10-06 }} ("Romanians in Ukraine (2)", p. 3), ''Noi, NU! Revistă de atitudine și de cultură'', August 7, 2005. Accessed December 20, 2006.</ref> The Soviet action culminated with the ], when 2,500 to 3,000 Romanian refugees who were attempting to leave Northern Bukovina for Romania were blocked by the ] and about 200 of them were shot, at a place called "Fântâna Albă" (''White Fountain'' in Romanian). This policy resulted in a substantial shrinkage of the Romanian population in the province. By 1941, out of 250,000 Romanians in Northern Bukovina, only 192,000 were left.{{fact|date=January 2021}} On June 22, 1941, Romania joined ] on the side of the ], in order to reclaim the lost territories of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina; these territories were regained by the Soviet Union in 1944 (see ]).
Whether the ] envisaged this entire scenario in ], 1940, is uncertain. But that this possible scenario was within the realm of Russia's long-range plans for Romania and Eastern Europe cannot be doubted. The ] were aware of Russian intentions throughout the interwar period, and the ] were also conscious of the potential advantages to be derived from ]'s ] attitudes in an eventual resolution of the Transylvanian question. And it is undeniable that the ] and the ] remain aware of ]'s interests in ] forty years after the ].


The territory of the ] (MSSR) was composed of Bessarabia (except for Southern Bessarabia, assigned to ]) and a part of the territory of the former ] (]), founded in 1924 within the territory of Ukraine. In the document confirming the establishment of the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (MASSR) of 12 October 1924 the West frontier of the republic was traced out not along the Dniester River but the ]. In the ] the ideology of a separate Moldovan identity was pursued, including the introduction of ], distinct from Romanian. The Cyrillic alphabet and abundant ] were introduced.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
An example of this policy’s efficiency to influence the public opinion in a totalitarian society constitutes the image of the post-war period in the ] implemented in the public opinion. Recollections of the local population about the forced deportations (1940-1941, 1944-1948, 1949), which led to the physical destruction of the social state that was socially and economically the most elevated and active state, had been erased. In 1946-1947, as a result of the famine organised in the ] (according to some data of certain scientists; official data are not published until nowadays), died around 300 thousand people and many cases of
cannibalism occurred. In addition, the population of the former ], as a part of the
], had to suffer also from the awful famine in the 30s
when in Ukraine several millions of people died. However, the truth about these crimes of
huge proportions produced an insignificant impression on the society and did not serve as
a strong argument in political confrontations even on the right bank of Dniester.
Therefore, those inherited stereotypes, amplified at a large scale by the UCWC (Unified
Council of Working Collectives) and mass media of ] were to be only
consolidated on the background of political confrontations in ]. The ideological
machinery of the unconstitutional separatist regime, following traditions of the 30s in the
USSR, made its best to transform the feeling of ] and the irrational fear
of the ]’s unification with ] into an extremely efficient
instrument to manipulate the public opinion, to create the image of the enemy from the
other side of the ].


In Bessarabia, the Soviet government pursued a policy of ] of the native Romanian population. First, the province was divided into a "Moldovan" Socialist Republic and a southern region known as ], which was renamed ] and attached to the ]. Elite elements of the Romanian population were then deported to Siberia much like their Bukovinian counterparts. Russian and Ukrainian settlers were used to fill the vacant areas caused by the deportation of Romanians.<ref>{{in lang|ro}} Nina Negru, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071010050411/http://www.jurnal.md/articol.php?id=3652&editie=409 |date=2007-10-10 }} ("Don't reach out to them with promises of happiness, discipline them with the Ten Commandments"), '']'', Edition 409, 30 August 2005. Accessed online 20 December 2006.</ref>
In ] (on the left bank of ]), the policy of Moscow oriented towards
changing the ethnic composition of the so-called “national republic” had been intensely
applied. For tens of years the native population was imposed (forced deportations of 1940
– 1949) or economically stimulated to leave for the eastern areas of the Soviet Empire.
For example, according to some statistical data, only in 1988 around 34.5 thousand
persons left the ] for the ] and 33.9 thousand persons arrived in
Moldova from Russia, 20.9 thousand left Moldova for Ukraine and 20.8 thousand arrived
in ] from ]. The territory of ] was more industrialised in
comparison with the other part of ] and the industrialisation process of Trans-
Dniestria was accompanied by a population flow from other areas of the USSR,
especially from the Russian Federation. Although in the ] the level of
population density was the highest one in the ], the power of ] continued to
stimulate the arrival of labour force from outside, including that with a poor qualification.
Even ] himself, current leader of the unconstitutional separatist regime of
Trans-Dniestria, was sent in 1987 from ] to town of ] to be the director of an
enterprise. This process was also amplified by the excessive militarization of the area.
Many officers of the Soviet Army, serving in military units on the left bank of Dniester
river, transferred to reserve, preferred to stay and live in Tiraspol and Bender. Therefore,
if on the whole in the ] in 1989 the native population was about 65%, in Trans-
Dniestria – only 40%. Moreover, the majority of native population on the left bank of
Dniester was dispersed in rural localities and it was more difficult for them to consolidate
and to express themselves politically. Most of population of the industrial centres on the
territory of ] had the mentality of the “the Soviet nation” that was
contradictory to the fight of the native population for their national rights and the idea of
transforming the ] into an independent state. Working collectives of the industrial
enterprises were conceived and used as shock detachments in political fights. At the same
time, the population - deeply affected by the feeling of ] – was absolutely
unprepared psychologically to accept the historical past of the MSSR. The adoption in
1989 of the Law on state language (official language) and Law on functioning of
languages on the territory of the ] generated an extremely negative reaction in
industrial centres of ]. By these laws, the Romanian (Moldovan) language
– language of the native population has been granted the status of state language and the
Latin alphabet has been restored instead of the ] one, the identity of ]
with ] has been recognised. Although the absolute majority of the
] population never read these laws which, in fact, served as a reason for
the conflict outburst, on the left bank of Dniester stereotypes had been immediately
created simulating that by the application of the new linguistic legislation, the [[Russian
language]] speakers would become second class citizens. At the industrial enterprises,
including those of the military-industrial complex of the ] strikes occurred protesting
against granting the status of official language to the mother language of the native
population. It is obvious that strikes within the military-industrial complex in principle
were impossible to take place without the approval of the ] leadership.


In 1946–1947, as a result of the famine organised{{Citation needed|date=November 2009}} in the ] (according to some data of certain scientists; official data has not yet been published), around 300,000 Romanians died and many instances of ] occurred{{Citation needed|date=November 2009}}. In addition, the population of the former MASSR, as a part of the ], also suffered from the artificial famine in the 1930s when several million people died in ] (''see also ]'').
==Post-USSR ] and ]==


The territory of Transnistria was more industrialised in comparison with the other part of ] and the industrialisation process of Transnistria was accompanied by a population flow from other areas of the USSR, especially from Russia. Although in the ] the level of population density was the highest one in the USSR, ] continued to stimulate the arrival of labour force from outside, including that with a poor qualification. Even ], the former leader of the separatist Transnistria, was sent in 1987 from ] to ] to be the director of an enterprise. This process was also amplified by the excessive militarization of the area.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
After the break-up of the ], many native Romanians hoped that their situation inside the newly independent Republic of ] would improve. Although this was true in the beginning, the Russification process started once again, after the 2001 elections which saw the ] took power.


The 1989 adoption of the Law on state language (official language) and Law on functioning of languages on the territory of the MSSR generated an extremely negative reaction in the industrial centres of Transnistria, where the largely ]-speaking population was not being consulted, and felt threatened by the prospects of ]. These laws proclaimed the Moldovan (Romanian) language, written in the Latin alphabet, as the only state language. The fact that ] and ] are identical was recognised. Although a majority of the Transnistrian population never read these laws which served as a reason for the conflict's outburst, they feared that by the application of the new linguistic legislation, ] speakers would become second-class citizens. At the industrial enterprises, including those of the military-industrial complex of the USSR, strikes occurred protesting against granting official language status to the Moldavian (Romanian) language.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
After 2001, the Moldovan leadership has reinforced the ] thesis whereby the natives of Moldova were not ] but "]". History books were replaced with new anti-Romanian ones while a move was made to reintroduce ] as an mandatory language in schools. This latter move angered many Moldovan-Romanians who took to the streets to protest the decision in ].


====Modern-day Russia====
The Communist government, as well as the Communist president ] has simultaneously accused Romania and the Romanian population inside Moldova of "imperialism", while at the same time putting extreme pressure on Romanian language newspapers.
Today, there is a strong opposition in Russia to Romania in the context of Moldova. A Russian newspaper, InfoRos, even accused Romanians of genocide against Moldovans.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://inforos.ru/en/?module=news&action=view&id=34022|title=The Moldovan genocide, which can not be forgotten|first=Alexander|last=Novik|newspaper=InfoRos|date=4 April 2014}}</ref> In 2022, during the ] and responding to a British declaration saying that Ukrainian attacks over military bases on Russian soil would be justified, the Russian news website ] said that Romania could be the first candidate for an attack with ] missiles, since "Romania may now invade Transnistria to save its Moldovan brothers there".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-razboi_ucraina-25522207-rusii-pravda-scriu-polonia-romania-sunt-candidatele-favorite-pentru-lovituri-rachete-kalibr.htm|title=Rușii de la Pravda scriu că România este prima candidată pentru lovituri cu rachete Kalibr: Bucureștiul ar putea invada Transnistria|first=Ionuț|last=Baiaș|work=]|date=28 April 2022|language=ro}}</ref>


An ethnic slur against Romanians as well as Moldovans used by Russians is {{lang|ru|мамалыжник}} ({{lang|ru-Latn|mamalyzhnik}}; in plural {{lang|ru|мамалыжники}}, {{lang|ru-Latn|mamalyzhniki}}). It originates from ], a Romanian dish.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.russki-mat.net/page.php?l=RuEn&a=%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8|title=мамалыжники|website=Russki-mat.net|access-date=29 April 2023|language=ru}}</ref>
In ], the situation is far worse. After the 1992 war between the pro-Russian breakaway republic and Moldova, the Romanian population was substantially persecuted, causing at least 5,000-10,000 Romanians to flee the region. Although the Romanians of Transnistria still comprise a plurality of the population, the Romanian language is almost never used in public. Cases were reported of Russian soldiers even beating Transnistrians who spoke in "]"/] in their presence.


===Post-Soviet Moldova===
Romanian schools comprise about 11% of the total schools in Transnistria, despite the fact that according to the latest Transnistrian census of 2004, Romanians make up about 32% of the population. Most of these schools are forced to teach in the ] script and use outdated, 40-year-old, communist-era books. 6 schools are permitted to teach in Romanian using the ], however pressure is often put on these institutions to close. The 2004 school scandal is a prime example of this, when the pro-Russian government in ] forcefully attempted to close down 2 of these schools. In the orphanage of ], Romanian children were beaten by Transnistrian and Russian troops and forced to sleep in the streets for a few months, until, due to the pressure of the Moldovan and Romanian governments as well as the ], they were allowed back in. Numerous Romanian parents were arrested or fired from their jobs due to their political views and their determination to keep their children in Romanian-language schools.
After the breakup of the USSR, various legislative reforms consolidated the position of ethnic Romanians/Moldovans, especially by establishing the ] as the official language. The 2001 parliamentary elections, won by the ], initially brought a series of attempts to raise Russian to the status of a state language. However, the project was dropped by popular opposition.{{fact|date=January 2021}}


Relations between the Moldovan and Romanian governments have initially included some tension as the Moldovan government led by President ] accused Romania of committing ], specifically declaring that "Romania has remained the only empire in Europe, consisting of Moldavia, Dobruja and Transylvania".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.mediafax.ro/main-story/focus-relatiile-romania-r-moldova-cand-calde-cand-reci-condimentate-cu-acuzatii-reciproce-5440851|title=FOCUS: Relațiile România-R. Moldova - când calde, când reci, condimentate cu acuzații reciproce|newspaper=]|date=25 January 2010|language=ro}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://adevarul.ro/moldova/politica/lideri-antiromani-republica-moldova-1_560024cbf5eaafab2cd8a42c/index.html|title=Lideri antiromâni din Republica Moldova|newspaper=]|date=22 September 2015|language=ro}}</ref> Nevertheless, in the recent past relations have improved and President Voronin as well as Romanian President ] have called for cooperation between the two sovereign states.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
Citizens who express pro-Romanian or pro-Moldovan attitudes are likewise persecuted in Transnistria. The ] group is the most commonly known and well-documented of these organisations.


In 2006, the ] Romanian-French School was forced by the government to change its name to the Gheorghe Asachi Moldovan-French School. Critics argued that the government acted unilaterally and discriminated against Romanians, as other schools such as the Necui-Levitski Russian-Ukrainian School were allowed to continue using that name. In protest, four high school students from Asachi replaced the new high school sign with another with the old name. They were charged with "group-committed aggravated hooliganism".<ref>{{in lang|ro}} {{Dead link|date=November 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} ("Four Moldovan students risk imprisonment for sustaining that they are Romanians"), '']'', 8 June 2006.</ref>
==]==


In Transnistria, the situation is considered to be far worse than the rest of Moldova. After the ], the Romanian population was substantially persecuted, causing at least 5,000 to 10,000 Romanians to flee the region. Although the number of Romanians in Transnistria is significant, Romanian is almost never used in public.{{Citation needed|date=March 2008}}
Ukraine has inherited the regions of Southern Bessarabia or ] as well as ] from the ], albeit the fact that Ukraine herself is not guilty of ]'s agreement with ] in 1940 to divide ] into ] and ] spheres of influence.


Romanian schools comprise about 11% of the total schools in Transnistria. Most of the schools are forced to teach in the ] script and use outdated, 40-year-old, communist-era books, and 6 schools are permitted to teach in Romanian using the ]; however, pressure is often put on the institutions to close. The ] is a prime example of this, when the pro-Russian government in ] forcefully attempted to close down 2 of the schools. In the orphanage of ], Romanian children returning from vacations found the orphanage locked by police. After spending a night outdoors, they forced their way into the building and had to stay there without water and electricity for a few months, until pressure from the Moldovan and Romanian governments and from the ] (OSCE) made the conflict get resolved.<ref></ref> Numerous Romanian parents were arrested or fired from their jobs for their political views and their determination to keep their children in Romanian-language schools.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
The Ukrainian government has followed a policy of ] from 1992 until today, which among others requires minority students to learn ] rather then their own languages. This measure affects almost 7 million Russians but also 385,000 Romanians who inhabit the historical regions mentioned above. The Ukrainian government likewise divides its Romanian minority into ] and ], something which is perceived as an attempt to downplay the importance of Romanian culture in Ukraine.


Citizens who express pro-Romanian or pro-Moldovan attitudes are likewise persecuted in Transnistria. The ] group is the most commonly known and well-documented of organisation.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
Dispite the ] treaty with Romania, which among others requires the two countries to respect each others minorities, Ukraine has continued to close down Romanian schools, while reports show that Romanian recruits in the Ukrainain army are systematically persecuted and humiliated.


===Ukraine===
==] and modern ]==
], as well as the ] and ] ]s (districts) of ] (Transcarpathia), are the regions in Ukraine with considerable Romanian minorities, according to the ].{{fact|date=January 2021}}


The Ukrainian Census of 2001 was criticized by Dr. Ion Popescu, leader of the National Council of the Interregional Union of the Romanian Community in Ukraine and also one of the authors of the ], who claims that the very existence of the classification of Moldovans as a separate ethnic group in census results is a "continuation of the ] and Soviet policies of artificially dividing Romanians into ] and ]"<!---is this a quote? than quotation marks are in order if not, pls replace with the exact quote--->. However, the response to the census question about the ethnicity had to be written in into the census form rather than picked from a pre-determined set of choices and the census respondents were free to claim their ethnicity as they wished<ref name=Censform> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060830230721/http://www.ukrcensus.gov.ua/eng/organization/ |date=August 30, 2006 }} at the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine web-site.</ref> not to respond to this or any other particular census question or not answer any questions at all; besides, no allegation of counting fraud were ever brought up. It is therefore unclear if Dr. Popescu criticizes the way in which the census was conducted or the way in which data was processed.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
] living in the ] province are very well represented at the provincial level despite their small presence (about 30,000 people), and their language is one of six official languages of the province, their counterparts in the Timok Valley who are 10 times more numerous have been persecuted for years.


The number of Romanian students at ] declined sharply in Soviet times. In 1991–92, the last year of Soviet rule, the number of Romanian students was only 4.44% (434 out of 9,769) . Among teaching faculty, under-representation of Romanians is also evident. The breakdown by nationalities (in the same year) reveals: Ukrainian teachers 465 (77.1%), Russians 102 (16.9%), Moldovans 9 (1.4%), Romanians 7 (1.1%), Belarusians 6 (0.9%), etc. Even after Ukrainian independence, the number of Romanian students at the University continued to decline, to only 3.9% in 1992–93, which is much less than the overall percentage of Romanians in the region's general population. Since 1997, arrangements have been made for some students to study at universities in Romania. In 2001 the ] from Ukraine reported that Romanians in ] lack an opportunity to study at the university level in their native language.
The Timok Romanians speak the same Daco-Romanian or Romanian-standard dialect as their kinsmen to the north, in Romania proper. The Serbian authorities however have pursued a policy of denationalization. No Romanian autonomy, schools or churches are permited in the area and all ethnic-Romanians must choose a ] name for their children, thus creating a false impression that the Timoc valley is inhabited by Serbs.


However, according to the Ukrainian Constitution adopted after its 1991 independence, ] is the only ] in the country, and the state higher education system was switched to Ukrainian, according to the common practice in many countries worldwide and this practice was not directed specifically at the Romanian population. For example, the majority of Ukrainian universities do not provide education in ] either, despite the fact that Russian is the native language of a much more considerable part of the population in Ukraine.{{fact|date=January 2021}}
In eastern Serbia (mainly in ] region) live people who speak basically same language as ]. These people declare themselves in census as ethnic ] and their number is about 40,000. These Vlachs (Romanians) are bilingual, they are fluent in two languages, Serbian and Vlach/Romanian. In everyday communication Vlachs (Romanians) mainly use Serbian language, while their native language is used mainly at home. Since many Vlachs declare themselves in census as Serbs, the real number of the people of Vlach origin is unknown (This number could be as high as 135,000, since that is a number of people whom declared Vlach language as their mother tongue in 1981 census).


At the same time, there are schools teaching Romanian as a primary language, as well as newspapers, TV, and radio broadcasting in Romanian , , . Future teachers for Romanian schools are trained in at the Chernivtsi University in the fields of Romanian philology, mathematics, and physics . Romanian organizations still complain that despite this, 19 villages inhabited by Romanians have been deprived of schooling in their native language, therefore creating a worse situation than that which existed under the repressive Soviet regime .
The year 2004 as well as 2005 saw a clash between the Serbian authorities and the Romanian community in Timoc when a Romanian priest decided to build a small church where he would hold services in Romanian. The priest has been subjected to threats while children attending the mass with their parents have been humiliated in the village school by their Serbian teacher.


===Yugoslavia and modern-day Serbia===
In the town of Negotin, the Romanian Cultural Association has been vandalized in the year 2004 when Serbian ultra-nationalists wrote "Romanians go home" on the windows of the main doors.
The ] living in the Serbian province of ] are very well represented at the provincial level despite their small presence (about 30,000 people, 1.5% of the province's population of around 2 million), and Romanian is one of the six official languages of the province. However, their counterparts in eastern ] (mostly in the ] and ]), known as "Vlachs" in ] and outnumbering the Serbian Romanians in Vojvodina, have not had any privileges. As example from ] in ], the Romanian local television station door was vandalized with the inscription "Out Romanians, Serbia!!!" (Serbian: ''Napolje Rumuni, Srbija!!!'').<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.blic.rs/Vesti/Hronika/342455/Grafiti-mrznje-u-Vrscu-Napolje-Rumuni|title=Blic Online - Grafiti mržnje u Vršcu: "Napolje Rumuni!"|work=Blic Online|date=12 September 2012 |access-date=25 January 2015}}</ref>

The Timok Romanians speak the same language (]) as is spoken to the north, in ].<ref>], Ethnizität und räumliche Verteilung der Aromunen in Südosteuropa. Münster, 1999</ref> However, the Serbian authorities have pursued a policy of de-nationalization as they have slowly changed the term Romanian into "Vlach" through the years.<ref>M. V. Fifor. Assimilation or Acculturalisation: Creating Identities in the New Europe. The case of Vlachs in Serbia. Published in Cultural Identity and Ethnicity in Central Europe, ], Cracow. M. Fifor Assimilation or Acculturalisation: Creating Identities in the New Europe. The case of Vlachs in Serbia.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ziua.ro/display.php?data=2008-03-01&id=233957|title=Două "școli" de interpretare istorică și lingvistică vin să conteste unitatea poporului român|lang=ro|first=George|last=Damian|newspaper=]|date=March 1, 2008|access-date=December 24, 2022|archive-date=February 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209124127/http://www.ziua.ro/display.php?data=2008-03-01&id=233957|url-status=dead}}</ref>

These people declare themselves on census forms as ethnic Vlachs and their number is about 40,000. Nevertheless, older Serbian censuses counted up to 200,000 Romanians in present-day Central Serbia (the 1895-census counted 159,510 Romanians, the 1921-census counted 150,098 Romanians, the 1953-census counted 198,793 "Vlach" (Romanian) speakers).{{fact|date=January 2021}}

Since 2004 there are regular clashes between the Serbian authorities and the Romanian community in Timok when ], a ] priest decided to build a small church where he would hold services in ]. Romanians in Serbia proper do not have the right to schooling and public worship in their native language.<ref name="Protests on the Council of Europe">{{cite web|url=http://assembly.coe.int/Mainf.asp?link=/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc05/EDOC10533.htm|title=Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l'Europe|work=coe.int|access-date=25 January 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,850103,00.html| title=In Serbien lebende Rumänen sehen sich in ihren Rechten beschnitten|lang=de|date=April 25, 2003|work=]|access-date=December 24, 2022}}</ref>

In the town of ], the Romanian Cultural Association was vandalized in 2004 when Serbian pro-fascist ultra-nationalists wrote "Out of Serbia" on the windows of the main doors.<ref name="Protests on the Council of Europe"/>

Some ] even treat Romanians as ] ]", even though no part of present-day ] was ever under Serbian rule.<ref></ref>

=== Romania ===
In 2013 accusations of discrimination in ] surfaced against Hungarian students and teachers. During a ceremony celebrating the ], some Romanian students wearing the ] were physically assaulted by older students, and threatened by teachers with punishment for wearing the national symbol. As a result, the Romanian human rights organisation ActiveWatch<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.activewatch.ro/en/about-us/about-activewatch/|title=About ActiveWatch|work=ActiveWatch|access-date=25 January 2015|archive-date=17 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150517085236/http://www.activewatch.ro/en/about-us/about-activewatch/|url-status=dead}}</ref> issued a statement condemning the actions of the school's administration, which it considers a blunt infringement of human rights and freedom of expression.<ref name="activewatch.ro">{{cite web|url=http://www.activewatch.ro/ro/freeex/reactie-rapida/dreptul-la-libera-exprimare-reprimat-abuziv-de-conducerea-unui-liceu-din-covasna/|title=Dreptul la liberă exprimare reprimat abuziv de conducerea unui liceu din Covasna|work=ActiveWatch|access-date=25 January 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://adevarul.ro/news/eveniment/protest-sabina-fetita-bentita-tricolor-zeci-persoane-costume-nationale-steaguri-romanesti-s-au-adunat-liceul-covasna-1_514c16d200f5182b853d5d1d/index.html|title=UPDATE Sute de persoane protestează în mai multe oraşe din ţară pentru susţinerea Sabinei, fata cu bentiţa tricoloră|work=adevarul.ro|date=22 March 2013 |access-date=25 January 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-esential-14467715-cazul-bentita-tricolora-protest-costume-nationale-liceul-din-covasna-elevii-nu-intrat-ore.htm|title=Cazul "bentița tricoloră": Protest in costume naționale la liceul din Covasna. Elevii nu au intrat la ore|lang=ro|date=March 22, 2013|work=]|access-date=December 26, 2022}}</ref>

=== Switzerland ===

In 2009, the ] ] (SVP) ran an anti-immigration campaign against Romanians and Bulgarian emigrants, distributing and displaying banners depicting citizens of these countries as "crows".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ithaca.edu/rhp/programs/cmd/blogs/posters_and_election_propaganda/another_anti-immigrant_poster_in_switzerland/|title=Posters and Election Propaganda|work=ithaca.edu|access-date=25 January 2015}}</ref>

===European Union===
Anti-Romanian sentiment in the European Union refers to the hatred, fear or discrimination of Romanian emigrants and citizens within the European Union.{{citation needed|date=December 2012}} Although Romania is a member of the EU, Romanian emigrants have faced ethnic profiling in various European countries and open discrimination in countries like Italy, France, Germany, Belgium, Greece or Austria.{{citation needed|date=December 2012}}

====United Kingdom====
In June 2009, having had their windows broken and death threats made against them, twenty Romanian-Roma families were forced from their homes in ], ], in ]. Up to{{vague|date=March 2019}} 115 people, including women and children, were forced to seek refuge in a local ] after being attacked. They were later moved by the authorities to a safer location.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2009/0618/1224249058810.html|title=Racist attacks on Roma are latest low in North's intolerant history|date=18 June 2009|newspaper=]|access-date=18 June 2009|archive-date=24 October 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101024035244/http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2009/0618/1224249058810.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> An ] rally in the city on 15 June was attacked by local youths chanting ] slogans.{{fact|date=January 2021}}

Following the arrest of three local youths in relation to the attacks, the church where the Romanians had been given shelter was badly vandalised. Using 'emergency funds', ] assisted most of the victims to return to Romania.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/jun/23/belfast-church-vandalised-racist-attacks-romanians|title=Vandals attack Belfast church that sheltered Romanian victims of racism|last= McDonald|first=Henry|date=23 June 2009|newspaper=]|access-date=23 June 2009 | location=London| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090626063353/http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jun/23/belfast-church-vandalised-racist-attacks-romanians| archive-date= 26 June 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/8114234.stm|title=Romanians leave NI after attacks|date=23 June 2009|work=]|access-date=23 June 2009| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090624091208/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/8114234.stm| archive-date= 24 June 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref>

In 2013, Romanian ambassador to the United Kingdom ] claimed that portions of the ] had written a series of unduly negative articles about Romanian immigrants. He claimed that these articles portrayed Romanian immigrants as being "invaders", criminals who abused social benefits and being involved in the ]. Jinga responded to these alleged claims in a series of interviews and articles in British newspapers, radio and television, presenting his views on the professional value of Romanian immigrants and their, in his view, significant contribution to the ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-02-22/alarmist-predictions-over-immigrants-could-cause-racism/|title=ITV: Alarmist predictions' over immigrants can cause racism|work=]|date=February 22, 2013|access-date=December 26, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://londra.mae.ro/en/local-news/1256|title=Ambassador's interview with Murnaghan On Sky News|website=londra.mae.ro|publisher=Embassy of Romania to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|date=February 3, 2013|access-date=December 26, 2022}}; see also: {{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9886338/Romanians-presence-in-the-United-Kingdom-and-the-value-of-free-movement-of-people.html|title=Romanians' presence in the United Kingdom and the value of free movement of people|first1=Ion|last1=Jinga|first2=Christopher|last2=Hope|newspaper=]|date=February 21, 2013|access-date=December 26, 2022}}</ref> He also blamed ] for inciting anti-Romanian prejudice and violent attacks against Romanian immigrants.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/09/27/romanian-ambassador_n_4003944.html|title=Romanian Ambassador Ion Jinga Blames Ukip For Racist Attacks|work=] UK|access-date=17 June 2015|date=2013-09-27}}</ref>

In 2013, the '']'' launched a "crusade" against new ] migrants from ] and ]. The article, published on the 31st of October, declared that "Britain is full and fed up. Today join your Daily Express Crusade to stop new flood of Romanian and Bulgarian migrants". ] leader ] declared that he had signed the petition, and urged others to do the same.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/440538/I-ve-signed-the-Express-petition-you-should-too-Remember-it-ll-be-Albanians-next|title=I've signed the Express petition – you should too! Remember, it'll be Albanians next...|author=Nigel Farage MEP|newspaper=]|access-date=17 June 2015|date=November 2013}}</ref> Romanian politician ] expressed "outrage" at the campaign.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/441065/Romanian-MEP-orders-Daily-Express-to-stop-our-campaign-to-halt-EU-migration|title=Romanian MEP orders Daily Express to 'stop' our campaign to halt EU migration|author=Max Evans|newspaper=]|access-date=17 June 2015|date=2013-11-04}}</ref>

====France====
{{pov|date=January 2021}}
Historically, France had cultivated a ] with the ]. France was a strong supporter of their independence and unification in 1859 and ultimately the establishment of ] in 1918. Many prominent Romanian scientists and artists such as ] and ] studied and worked in ], and Bucharest was nicknamed ''Le Petit Paris'' for its cosmopolitan atmosphere. Furthermore, the ] alludes to the ideals of the ] and has been interpreted as Liberty (blue), Justice (yellow), Fraternity (red).{{fact|date=January 2021}} However, following the deportation of ] citizens from France, and numerous discriminatory articles in the ],{{clarify|date=January 2020}} there was a small protest in front of the French embassy in Bucharest, against the discrimination against Romanians in France.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.yahoo.com/romanians-protest-discrimination-french-media-111226486.html|title=Romanians protest discrimination in French media|date=13 October 2011|work=]|access-date=25 January 2015}}</ref>

====Netherlands====
A Dutch right-wing political party (] (PVV)) launched a website aimed at gathering denunciations against Polish, Romanian, and Bulgarian nationals living in the Netherlands.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/justice/dutch-website-causes-stir-centra-news-510729|title=Dutch website causes stir in Central Europe|work=]|access-date=25 January 2015|date=2012-02-10}}</ref> Denunciations consist of competition on the job market, and others, with the slogan: "Are they causing you problems? Or did you lose your job to a Pole, Bulgarian, Romanian or other Central or East European? We would love to hear from you,"; thus inciting social tension between citizens of other European countries exercising their treaty right of freedom of movement, and the local population. The Netherlands is one of the main countries blocking Romania and Bulgaria from joining the ]; as well as one of the countries where populism is growing.{{fact|date=January 2021}}

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

==Notes==
{{reflist}}


==References== ==References==
{{Refbegin}}
*{{cite book |last=Georgescu |first=Vlad |date=1991 |title=The Romanians-A History |publisher=Ohio State University Press }}
*{{cite book |last1=Pop |first1=Ioan-Aurel |last2=Nägler |first2=Thomas |last3=Bărbulescu |first3=Mihai |last4=Dörner |first4=E. Anton |last5=Glodariu |first5=Ioan |last6=Pop |first6=P. Grigor |last7=Rotea |first7=Mihai |last8=Vasiliev |first8=Valentin |editor1-last=Pop |editor1-first=Ioan-Aurel |editor2-last=Nägler |editor2-first=Thomas |title=Istoria Transilvaniei, vol. I (până la 1541) |date=2003 |publisher=Centrul de Studii Transilvane - Institutul Cultural Român |location=Cluj-Napoca |url=http://digital-library.ulbsibiu.ro/dspace/handle/123456789/1966 |access-date=2019-10-25 |archive-date=2019-10-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191025082449/http://digital-library.ulbsibiu.ro/dspace/handle/123456789/1966 |url-status=dead }}

===Transnistria=== ===Transnistria===
# {{cite news
#''BBC'' - 2004
|publisher=BBC
|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/romanian/news/story/2004/07/040716_osce_scoli.shtml
|title=Lichidarea școlilor românești din Transnistria
|year=2004
|language=ro
}}

===USSR=== ===USSR===
# {{cite book
#Grenoble, Lenore A (2003). ''Language Policy in the Soviet Union'', Springer, ISBN 1402012985
|last=Grenoble |first=Lenore A
|year=2003
|title=Language Policy in the Soviet Union
|publisher=Springer
|isbn=1-4020-1298-5
}}

===Transylvania=== ===Transylvania===
# {{cite book
#Pop, Ioan-Aurel (1997). ''Istoria Transilvaniei Medievale'', ISBN 9739261248
|last=Pop |first=Ioan-Aurel
|year=1997
|title=Istoria Transilvaniei Medievale
|publisher=Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană
|isbn=973-9261-24-8
|language=ro}}
# {{in lang|hu}} Romsics, Ignác. Magyarország története a huszadik században ("A History of Hungary in the 20th Century"), p.&nbsp;85-86.

===Serbia=== ===Serbia===
# {{cite news
#Crăciun, Gilia. ''] - '' (in Romanian)
|last=Crăciun
#Mihalcea, Florian. ''] - '' (in Romanian)
|first=Gilia
#Petrovici, Georgeta. '']'' (in Romanian)
|publisher=]
#Ursuleţu, Lucian. ''] - '' (in Romanian)
|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/romanian/news/story/2004/12/041223_romani_timoc.shtml
#Dolha, Viorel. ''ROST'' - (in Romanian)
|title=Minoritatea românilor din Serbia este nemulțumită
|date=December 23, 2004
|language=ro
}}
# {{cite news
|last=Djenovic
|first=Drasko
|publisher=Forum18
|url=http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=589&printer=Y
|title=Serbia: Police ban Romanian Orthodox commemoration
|date=June 20, 2005
}}
# {{cite news
|last=Mihalcea
|first=Florian
|publisher=]
|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/romanian/news/story/2005/09/050916_malainita.shtml
|title=Biserica românească din Malainița amenințată din nou
|date=September 16, 2005
|language=ro
}}
# {{cite news
|last=Petrovici
|first=Georgeta
|publisher=]
|url=http://www.evenimentulzilei.ro/vest/?news_id=199334
|title=Românii nimănui
|language=ro
}}{{Dead link|date=May 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
# {{cite news
|last=Ursulețu
|first=Lucian
|publisher=]
|url=http://www.evz.ro/social/?news_id=185363
|title=Slujbă clandestină pentru românii de pe Valea Timocului
|language=ro
|access-date=2005-10-14
|archive-date=2020-09-29
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200929015720/https://evz.ro/social?news_id=185363
|url-status=dead
}}
{{Refend}}

{{Discrimination}}


] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 00:52, 24 December 2024

Hostility toward or prejudice against Romanians Not to be confused with Anti-Romani sentiment.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Anti-Romanian sentiment" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (May 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/national
Manifestations
Policies
Countermeasures
Related topics

Anti-Romanian sentiment, also known as Romanophobia (Romanian: antiromânism, românofobie) is hostility, hatred towards, or prejudice against Romanians as an ethnic, linguistic, religious, or perceived ethnic group, and it can range from personal feelings of hatred to institutionalized, violent persecution.

To varying degrees, anti-Romanian discrimination and sentiment have both been present among the populations and governments of nations which border Romania, either towards Romania itself or towards Romanian ethnic minorities which have resided in these countries. Similar patterns have also existed towards other ethnic groups, both in the region and elsewhere in the world, especially where political borders do not coincide with the patterns of ethnic populations.

By country

Kingdom of Hungary and the Habsburg Monarchy

Transylvania in the Middle Ages was organized according to the system of Estates, which were privileged groups (universitates) with power and influence in socio-economic and political life, being nonetheless organized according to certain ethnic criteria as well. The first Estate was the lay and ecclesiastic aristocracy, ethnically heterogeneous, but undergoing a process of homogenization around its Hungarian nucleus. The other Estates were Saxons, Székelys, and Romanians (or VlachsUniversitas Valachorum), all with an ethnic and ethno-linguistic basis (Universis nobilibus, Saxonibus, Syculis et Olachis). The general assembly (congregatio generalis) of the four Estates had mainly supra-legislative powers in Transylvania, but it sometimes took measures regarding order in the country, relationships between the privileged, military issues, etc.

The turning point in the history of the Romanian population in Transylvania was in 1366, when through the Decree of Turda King Louis I Anjou of Hungary redefined nobility in terms of membership in the Roman Catholic Church, thus specifically excluding the Eastern Orthodox Romanians.

Gradually, after 1366, Romanians lost their status as an Estate and were excluded from Transylvania's assemblies. This meant that the Romanian population of Transylvania was never directly represented in the Transylvanian Diet, which consisted of Hungarian nobles, German and Székely nobles (the Unio Trium Nationum).

In the 16th century, Transylvanian laws of justice separated the rights of Hungarians, Saxons, and Székelys from the rights of the Romanians, while Eastern Orthodox became a tolerated religion (opposed to the four privileged religions – Catholicism, Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Unitariasm).

During the Habsburg rule of Transylvania, in order to escape their inferior status, and in correlation with the Austrian interest to strengthen Catholicism, the Romanian Orthodox accepted a proposal for a "church union" (accepting Catholic dogma and retaining Orthodox ritual and calendar), but the other privileged nations objected and the status of the Romanians remained eventually unchanged.

As a consequence, Romanian peasants would sometimes revolt and demand better treatment. These revolts – even if the initial causes did not have ethnic grounds or shared the fate of the whole peasantry – were firmly suppressed such as the 1784 Romanian peasant uprising, in which Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor, after learning of the escalated situation, ordered the army to intervene. The three leaders were caught by treason in their hiding places and handed over to General Paul Kray. Horea and Cloșca were executed by breaking on the wheel, while Crișan hanged himself in prison before the execution.

In December 1918, after the First World War, the Union of Transylvania with Romania was declared at Alba Iulia by an assembly of the delegates of ethnic Romanians in Transylvania. Following the Hungarian–Romanian War of 1919 and the Treaty of Trianon of 1920, eventually Transylvania became part of Romania.

Russia

Russian Empire

Bessarabia became part of the Russian Empire under the 1812 Treaty of Bucharest. A period of autonomy followed, but in 1828 all Romanian government institutions, schools and presses were closed and replaced by a Russian-style provincial administration. At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, Bessarabia saw an intense process of Russification. Military service also became a new instrument of Russification. The process of Russification and colonization of this territory started to be carried out by representatives of other ethnic groups of the Russian Empire, including Jews, Germans, Bulgarians, Gagauz, and Ukrainians.

  • Russian census 1817: 86% Romanians
  • Russian census 1856: 74% Romanians
  • Russian census 1897: 56% Romanians

Soviet Union

When the Russian Empire collapsed after the Russian Revolution of 1917, a local body called "Sfatul Țării" ("Council of the Country") was created in Bessarabia. Moldova became an independent republic on December 2, 1917. Given that Soviet raids already menaced the newly formed authority, the local body ("Sfatul Țării") called in support troops from the Kingdom of Romania. The troops entered Bessarabia on December 13. On March 27, 1918, Sfatul Țării voted to unite with Romania. Subsequently, the Soviet Union refused to recognize the union, and supported an intense propaganda campaign stating that the Kingdom of Romania was an imperialistic state.

Bessarabia was a part of Romania until June 1940, when the Soviet Union re-annexed the territory as well as Northern Bukovina, after delivering an ultimatum that threatened the use of force (see Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina).

The convention of October 28, 1920, whereby the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Japan recognized Romanian sovereignty in Bessarabia, was rejected as invalid by the USSR. The Soviet government even denied the validity of that part of the convention that stipulated that, upon Soviet request, the Council of the League of Nations could be empowered to arbitrate the Soviet-Romanian dispute over Bessarabia. In short, the Kremlin insisted that Romania was illegally occupying Bessarabia. Moscow also encouraged revolutionary activities by Bolshevik elements in Bessarabia.

The exact position of the USSR on these issues is unknown except for Moscow's unwillingness to make any concessions to the Romanian government on Bessarabian issues. Recent tracts by Romanian historians have emphasized the support given by Romanian Communists to the "democratic forces" opposed to alteration of the status quo in Transylvania in 1938 and subsequent years. True as this may be, there has been no evidence presented in support of any fundamental change in Moscow's positions with respect to Bessarabia in 1938 and subsequent years.

According to official NKVD documents, over 15,000 Romanians from Northern Bukovina were deported to Siberia in 1940 alone. The Soviet action culminated with the Fântâna Albă massacre, when 2,500 to 3,000 Romanian refugees who were attempting to leave Northern Bukovina for Romania were blocked by the Soviet Border Troops and about 200 of them were shot, at a place called "Fântâna Albă" (White Fountain in Romanian). This policy resulted in a substantial shrinkage of the Romanian population in the province. By 1941, out of 250,000 Romanians in Northern Bukovina, only 192,000 were left. On June 22, 1941, Romania joined Operation Barbarossa on the side of the Axis, in order to reclaim the lost territories of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina; these territories were regained by the Soviet Union in 1944 (see Romania in World War II).

The territory of the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic (MSSR) was composed of Bessarabia (except for Southern Bessarabia, assigned to Ukraine) and a part of the territory of the former Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (Transnistria), founded in 1924 within the territory of Ukraine. In the document confirming the establishment of the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (MASSR) of 12 October 1924 the West frontier of the republic was traced out not along the Dniester River but the Prut River. In the MASSR the ideology of a separate Moldovan identity was pursued, including the introduction of Moldovan language, distinct from Romanian. The Cyrillic alphabet and abundant Russisms were introduced.

In Bessarabia, the Soviet government pursued a policy of assimilation of the native Romanian population. First, the province was divided into a "Moldovan" Socialist Republic and a southern region known as Budjak, which was renamed Izmail Oblast and attached to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. Elite elements of the Romanian population were then deported to Siberia much like their Bukovinian counterparts. Russian and Ukrainian settlers were used to fill the vacant areas caused by the deportation of Romanians.

In 1946–1947, as a result of the famine organised in the MSSR (according to some data of certain scientists; official data has not yet been published), around 300,000 Romanians died and many instances of cannibalism occurred. In addition, the population of the former MASSR, as a part of the Ukrainian SSR, also suffered from the artificial famine in the 1930s when several million people died in Ukraine (see also Holodomor).

The territory of Transnistria was more industrialised in comparison with the other part of Moldova and the industrialisation process of Transnistria was accompanied by a population flow from other areas of the USSR, especially from Russia. Although in the Republic of Moldova the level of population density was the highest one in the USSR, Moscow continued to stimulate the arrival of labour force from outside, including that with a poor qualification. Even Igor Smirnov, the former leader of the separatist Transnistria, was sent in 1987 from Russia to Bender to be the director of an enterprise. This process was also amplified by the excessive militarization of the area.

The 1989 adoption of the Law on state language (official language) and Law on functioning of languages on the territory of the MSSR generated an extremely negative reaction in the industrial centres of Transnistria, where the largely Russian-speaking population was not being consulted, and felt threatened by the prospects of Romanianization. These laws proclaimed the Moldovan (Romanian) language, written in the Latin alphabet, as the only state language. The fact that Moldovan and Romanian are identical was recognised. Although a majority of the Transnistrian population never read these laws which served as a reason for the conflict's outburst, they feared that by the application of the new linguistic legislation, Russian language speakers would become second-class citizens. At the industrial enterprises, including those of the military-industrial complex of the USSR, strikes occurred protesting against granting official language status to the Moldavian (Romanian) language.

Modern-day Russia

Today, there is a strong opposition in Russia to Romania in the context of Moldova. A Russian newspaper, InfoRos, even accused Romanians of genocide against Moldovans. In 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and responding to a British declaration saying that Ukrainian attacks over military bases on Russian soil would be justified, the Russian news website Pravda.ru said that Romania could be the first candidate for an attack with 3M-54 Kalibr missiles, since "Romania may now invade Transnistria to save its Moldovan brothers there".

An ethnic slur against Romanians as well as Moldovans used by Russians is мамалыжник (mamalyzhnik; in plural мамалыжники, mamalyzhniki). It originates from mămăligă, a Romanian dish.

Post-Soviet Moldova

After the breakup of the USSR, various legislative reforms consolidated the position of ethnic Romanians/Moldovans, especially by establishing the Moldovan language as the official language. The 2001 parliamentary elections, won by the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova, initially brought a series of attempts to raise Russian to the status of a state language. However, the project was dropped by popular opposition.

Relations between the Moldovan and Romanian governments have initially included some tension as the Moldovan government led by President Vladimir Voronin accused Romania of committing imperialism, specifically declaring that "Romania has remained the only empire in Europe, consisting of Moldavia, Dobruja and Transylvania". Nevertheless, in the recent past relations have improved and President Voronin as well as Romanian President Traian Băsescu have called for cooperation between the two sovereign states.

In 2006, the Gheorghe Asachi Romanian-French School was forced by the government to change its name to the Gheorghe Asachi Moldovan-French School. Critics argued that the government acted unilaterally and discriminated against Romanians, as other schools such as the Necui-Levitski Russian-Ukrainian School were allowed to continue using that name. In protest, four high school students from Asachi replaced the new high school sign with another with the old name. They were charged with "group-committed aggravated hooliganism".

In Transnistria, the situation is considered to be far worse than the rest of Moldova. After the 1992 war, the Romanian population was substantially persecuted, causing at least 5,000 to 10,000 Romanians to flee the region. Although the number of Romanians in Transnistria is significant, Romanian is almost never used in public.

Romanian schools comprise about 11% of the total schools in Transnistria. Most of the schools are forced to teach in the Cyrillic script and use outdated, 40-year-old, communist-era books, and 6 schools are permitted to teach in Romanian using the Latin script; however, pressure is often put on the institutions to close. The 2004 school crisis is a prime example of this, when the pro-Russian government in Tiraspol forcefully attempted to close down 2 of the schools. In the orphanage of Tighina, Romanian children returning from vacations found the orphanage locked by police. After spending a night outdoors, they forced their way into the building and had to stay there without water and electricity for a few months, until pressure from the Moldovan and Romanian governments and from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) made the conflict get resolved. Numerous Romanian parents were arrested or fired from their jobs for their political views and their determination to keep their children in Romanian-language schools.

Citizens who express pro-Romanian or pro-Moldovan attitudes are likewise persecuted in Transnistria. The Ilie Ilașcu group is the most commonly known and well-documented of organisation.

Ukraine

Northern Bukovina, as well as the Tiachiv and Rakhiv raions (districts) of Zakarpattia Oblast (Transcarpathia), are the regions in Ukraine with considerable Romanian minorities, according to the 2001 Ukrainian Census.

The Ukrainian Census of 2001 was criticized by Dr. Ion Popescu, leader of the National Council of the Interregional Union of the Romanian Community in Ukraine and also one of the authors of the Constitution of Ukraine, who claims that the very existence of the classification of Moldovans as a separate ethnic group in census results is a "continuation of the Stalinist and Soviet policies of artificially dividing Romanians into Romanians and Moldovans". However, the response to the census question about the ethnicity had to be written in into the census form rather than picked from a pre-determined set of choices and the census respondents were free to claim their ethnicity as they wished not to respond to this or any other particular census question or not answer any questions at all; besides, no allegation of counting fraud were ever brought up. It is therefore unclear if Dr. Popescu criticizes the way in which the census was conducted or the way in which data was processed.

The number of Romanian students at Chernivtsi University declined sharply in Soviet times. In 1991–92, the last year of Soviet rule, the number of Romanian students was only 4.44% (434 out of 9,769) . Among teaching faculty, under-representation of Romanians is also evident. The breakdown by nationalities (in the same year) reveals: Ukrainian teachers 465 (77.1%), Russians 102 (16.9%), Moldovans 9 (1.4%), Romanians 7 (1.1%), Belarusians 6 (0.9%), etc. Even after Ukrainian independence, the number of Romanian students at the University continued to decline, to only 3.9% in 1992–93, which is much less than the overall percentage of Romanians in the region's general population. Since 1997, arrangements have been made for some students to study at universities in Romania. In 2001 the Christian-Democratic Alliance of the Romanians from Ukraine reported that Romanians in Chernivtsi lack an opportunity to study at the university level in their native language.

However, according to the Ukrainian Constitution adopted after its 1991 independence, Ukrainian is the only state language in the country, and the state higher education system was switched to Ukrainian, according to the common practice in many countries worldwide and this practice was not directed specifically at the Romanian population. For example, the majority of Ukrainian universities do not provide education in Russian either, despite the fact that Russian is the native language of a much more considerable part of the population in Ukraine.

At the same time, there are schools teaching Romanian as a primary language, as well as newspapers, TV, and radio broadcasting in Romanian , , . Future teachers for Romanian schools are trained in at the Chernivtsi University in the fields of Romanian philology, mathematics, and physics . Romanian organizations still complain that despite this, 19 villages inhabited by Romanians have been deprived of schooling in their native language, therefore creating a worse situation than that which existed under the repressive Soviet regime .

Yugoslavia and modern-day Serbia

The Romanians living in the Serbian province of Vojvodina are very well represented at the provincial level despite their small presence (about 30,000 people, 1.5% of the province's population of around 2 million), and Romanian is one of the six official languages of the province. However, their counterparts in eastern Central Serbia (mostly in the Timok Valley and Branicevo), known as "Vlachs" in Serbian and outnumbering the Serbian Romanians in Vojvodina, have not had any privileges. As example from Negotin in Vršac, the Romanian local television station door was vandalized with the inscription "Out Romanians, Serbia!!!" (Serbian: Napolje Rumuni, Srbija!!!).

The Timok Romanians speak the same language (Daco-Romanian) as is spoken to the north, in Romania. However, the Serbian authorities have pursued a policy of de-nationalization as they have slowly changed the term Romanian into "Vlach" through the years.

These people declare themselves on census forms as ethnic Vlachs and their number is about 40,000. Nevertheless, older Serbian censuses counted up to 200,000 Romanians in present-day Central Serbia (the 1895-census counted 159,510 Romanians, the 1921-census counted 150,098 Romanians, the 1953-census counted 198,793 "Vlach" (Romanian) speakers).

Since 2004 there are regular clashes between the Serbian authorities and the Romanian community in Timok when Bojan Aleksandrović, a Romanian Orthodox priest decided to build a small church where he would hold services in Romanian. Romanians in Serbia proper do not have the right to schooling and public worship in their native language.

In the town of Negotin, the Romanian Cultural Association was vandalized in 2004 when Serbian pro-fascist ultra-nationalists wrote "Out of Serbia" on the windows of the main doors.

Some Serbian ultranationalists even treat Romanians as "Romanized Serbs", even though no part of present-day Romania was ever under Serbian rule.

Romania

In 2013 accusations of discrimination in Covasna surfaced against Hungarian students and teachers. During a ceremony celebrating the Hungarian National Day, some Romanian students wearing the Romanian flag were physically assaulted by older students, and threatened by teachers with punishment for wearing the national symbol. As a result, the Romanian human rights organisation ActiveWatch issued a statement condemning the actions of the school's administration, which it considers a blunt infringement of human rights and freedom of expression.

Switzerland

In 2009, the right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP) ran an anti-immigration campaign against Romanians and Bulgarian emigrants, distributing and displaying banners depicting citizens of these countries as "crows".

European Union

Anti-Romanian sentiment in the European Union refers to the hatred, fear or discrimination of Romanian emigrants and citizens within the European Union. Although Romania is a member of the EU, Romanian emigrants have faced ethnic profiling in various European countries and open discrimination in countries like Italy, France, Germany, Belgium, Greece or Austria.

United Kingdom

In June 2009, having had their windows broken and death threats made against them, twenty Romanian-Roma families were forced from their homes in Lisburn Road, Belfast, in Northern Ireland. Up to 115 people, including women and children, were forced to seek refuge in a local church hall after being attacked. They were later moved by the authorities to a safer location. An anti-racist rally in the city on 15 June was attacked by local youths chanting neo-Nazi slogans.

Following the arrest of three local youths in relation to the attacks, the church where the Romanians had been given shelter was badly vandalised. Using 'emergency funds', Northern Irish government assisted most of the victims to return to Romania.

In 2013, Romanian ambassador to the United Kingdom Ion Jinga claimed that portions of the British media had written a series of unduly negative articles about Romanian immigrants. He claimed that these articles portrayed Romanian immigrants as being "invaders", criminals who abused social benefits and being involved in the 2013 horse meat scandal. Jinga responded to these alleged claims in a series of interviews and articles in British newspapers, radio and television, presenting his views on the professional value of Romanian immigrants and their, in his view, significant contribution to the British economy. He also blamed UKIP for inciting anti-Romanian prejudice and violent attacks against Romanian immigrants.

In 2013, the Daily Express launched a "crusade" against new EU migrants from Bulgaria and Romania. The article, published on the 31st of October, declared that "Britain is full and fed up. Today join your Daily Express Crusade to stop new flood of Romanian and Bulgarian migrants". UKIP leader Nigel Farage declared that he had signed the petition, and urged others to do the same. Romanian politician Cătălin Ivan expressed "outrage" at the campaign.

France

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Historically, France had cultivated a close relationship with the Romanian Principalities. France was a strong supporter of their independence and unification in 1859 and ultimately the establishment of Greater Romania in 1918. Many prominent Romanian scientists and artists such as Henri Coandă and Constantin Brâncuși studied and worked in Paris, and Bucharest was nicknamed Le Petit Paris for its cosmopolitan atmosphere. Furthermore, the Romanian flag alludes to the ideals of the French Revolution and has been interpreted as Liberty (blue), Justice (yellow), Fraternity (red). However, following the deportation of Roma-Romanian citizens from France, and numerous discriminatory articles in the French media, there was a small protest in front of the French embassy in Bucharest, against the discrimination against Romanians in France.

Netherlands

A Dutch right-wing political party (Party for Freedom (PVV)) launched a website aimed at gathering denunciations against Polish, Romanian, and Bulgarian nationals living in the Netherlands. Denunciations consist of competition on the job market, and others, with the slogan: "Are they causing you problems? Or did you lose your job to a Pole, Bulgarian, Romanian or other Central or East European? We would love to hear from you,"; thus inciting social tension between citizens of other European countries exercising their treaty right of freedom of movement, and the local population. The Netherlands is one of the main countries blocking Romania and Bulgaria from joining the Schengen Agreement; as well as one of the countries where populism is growing.

See also

Notes

  1. Human Rights at the Turn of New Millenium in the Republic of Moldova. Moldovan Helsinki Committee for Human Rights. 2001. ISBN 9789975964500. Retrieved 25 January 2015 – via google.ro.
  2. The word antiromânism is sometimes written without diacritics, and can be a cause of some confusion, because antiromanism can also mean antiţiganism (discrimination and prejudice against the Romani people).
  3. Georgescu 1991, pp. 40–58.
  4. Pop et al. 2003, pp. 233-.
  5. Georgescu 1991, p. 63.
  6. ^ Georgescu 1991, pp. 41–59.
  7. Georgescu 1991, pp. 43–61, 88–106.
  8. Hegyes András - Marczali Henrik: Erdély története (Budapest, 2002) 141-147 o. ISBN 9639452297
  9. (in Romanian) Gabriel Gherasim, Românii din Ucraina (2), p. 3 Archived 2007-10-06 at the Wayback Machine ("Romanians in Ukraine (2)", p. 3), Noi, NU! Revistă de atitudine și de cultură, August 7, 2005. Accessed December 20, 2006.
  10. (in Romanian) Nina Negru, Nu-i lua cu fericirile - disciplinează-i cu decalogul Archived 2007-10-10 at the Wayback Machine ("Don't reach out to them with promises of happiness, discipline them with the Ten Commandments"), Jurnal de Chișinău, Edition 409, 30 August 2005. Accessed online 20 December 2006.
  11. Novik, Alexander (4 April 2014). "The Moldovan genocide, which can not be forgotten". InfoRos.
  12. Baiaș, Ionuț (28 April 2022). "Rușii de la Pravda scriu că România este prima candidată pentru lovituri cu rachete Kalibr: Bucureștiul ar putea invada Transnistria". HotNews (in Romanian).
  13. "мамалыжники". Russki-mat.net (in Russian). Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  14. "FOCUS: Relațiile România-R. Moldova - când calde, când reci, condimentate cu acuzații reciproce". Mediafax (in Romanian). 25 January 2010.
  15. "Lideri antiromâni din Republica Moldova". Adevărul (in Romanian). 22 September 2015.
  16. (in Romanian) 4 elevi moldoveni riscă inchisoarea, pentru că susțin că sunt români ("Four Moldovan students risk imprisonment for sustaining that they are Romanians"), Gândul, 8 June 2006.
  17. OSCE report about Romanian language in Transnistria
  18. The Census form Archived August 30, 2006, at the Wayback Machine at the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine web-site.
  19. "Blic Online - Grafiti mržnje u Vršcu: "Napolje Rumuni!"". Blic Online. 12 September 2012. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  20. Thede Kahl, Ethnizität und räumliche Verteilung der Aromunen in Südosteuropa. Münster, 1999
  21. M. V. Fifor. Assimilation or Acculturalisation: Creating Identities in the New Europe. The case of Vlachs in Serbia. Published in Cultural Identity and Ethnicity in Central Europe, Jagellonian University, Cracow. M. Fifor Assimilation or Acculturalisation: Creating Identities in the New Europe. The case of Vlachs in Serbia.
  22. Damian, George (March 1, 2008). "Două "școli" de interpretare istorică și lingvistică vin să conteste unitatea poporului român". Ziua (in Romanian). Archived from the original on February 9, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2022.
  23. ^ "Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l'Europe". coe.int. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  24. "In Serbien lebende Rumänen sehen sich in ihren Rechten beschnitten". Deutsche Welle (in German). April 25, 2003. Retrieved December 24, 2022.
  25. ПРЕЦИ РУМУНА СУ СРБИ
  26. "About ActiveWatch". ActiveWatch. Archived from the original on 17 May 2015. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  27. "Dreptul la liberă exprimare reprimat abuziv de conducerea unui liceu din Covasna". ActiveWatch. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  28. "UPDATE Sute de persoane protestează în mai multe oraşe din ţară pentru susţinerea Sabinei, fata cu bentiţa tricoloră". adevarul.ro. 22 March 2013. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  29. "Cazul "bentița tricoloră": Protest in costume naționale la liceul din Covasna. Elevii nu au intrat la ore". HotNews (in Romanian). March 22, 2013. Retrieved December 26, 2022.
  30. "Posters and Election Propaganda". ithaca.edu. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  31. "Racist attacks on Roma are latest low in North's intolerant history". The Irish Times. 18 June 2009. Archived from the original on 24 October 2010. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
  32. McDonald, Henry (23 June 2009). "Vandals attack Belfast church that sheltered Romanian victims of racism". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 26 June 2009. Retrieved 23 June 2009.
  33. "Romanians leave NI after attacks". BBC News. 23 June 2009. Archived from the original on 24 June 2009. Retrieved 23 June 2009.
  34. "ITV: Alarmist predictions' over immigrants can cause racism". ITV. February 22, 2013. Retrieved December 26, 2022.
  35. "Ambassador's interview with Murnaghan On Sky News". londra.mae.ro. Embassy of Romania to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. February 3, 2013. Retrieved December 26, 2022.; see also: Jinga, Ion; Hope, Christopher (February 21, 2013). "Romanians' presence in the United Kingdom and the value of free movement of people". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved December 26, 2022.
  36. "Romanian Ambassador Ion Jinga Blames Ukip For Racist Attacks". The Huffington Post UK. 2013-09-27. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  37. Nigel Farage MEP (November 2013). "I've signed the Express petition – you should too! Remember, it'll be Albanians next..." Daily Express. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  38. Max Evans (2013-11-04). "Romanian MEP orders Daily Express to 'stop' our campaign to halt EU migration". Daily Express. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  39. "Romanians protest discrimination in French media". Yahoo News. 13 October 2011. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  40. "Dutch website causes stir in Central Europe". Euractiv. 2012-02-10. Retrieved 25 January 2015.

References

  • Georgescu, Vlad (1991). The Romanians-A History. Ohio State University Press.
  • Pop, Ioan-Aurel; Nägler, Thomas; Bărbulescu, Mihai; Dörner, E. Anton; Glodariu, Ioan; Pop, P. Grigor; Rotea, Mihai; Vasiliev, Valentin (2003). Pop, Ioan-Aurel; Nägler, Thomas (eds.). Istoria Transilvaniei, vol. I (până la 1541). Cluj-Napoca: Centrul de Studii Transilvane - Institutul Cultural Român. Archived from the original on 2019-10-25. Retrieved 2019-10-25.

Transnistria

  1. "Lichidarea școlilor românești din Transnistria" (in Romanian). BBC. 2004.

USSR

  1. Grenoble, Lenore A (2003). Language Policy in the Soviet Union. Springer. ISBN 1-4020-1298-5.

Transylvania

  1. Pop, Ioan-Aurel (1997). Istoria Transilvaniei Medievale (in Romanian). Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană. ISBN 973-9261-24-8.
  2. (in Hungarian) Romsics, Ignác. Magyarország története a huszadik században ("A History of Hungary in the 20th Century"), p. 85-86.

Serbia

  1. Crăciun, Gilia (December 23, 2004). "Minoritatea românilor din Serbia este nemulțumită" (in Romanian). BBC.
  2. Djenovic, Drasko (June 20, 2005). "Serbia: Police ban Romanian Orthodox commemoration". Forum18.
  3. Mihalcea, Florian (September 16, 2005). "Biserica românească din Malainița amenințată din nou" (in Romanian). BBC.
  4. Petrovici, Georgeta. "Românii nimănui" (in Romanian). Evenimentul Zilei.
  5. Ursulețu, Lucian. "Slujbă clandestină pentru românii de pe Valea Timocului" (in Romanian). Evenimentul Zilei. Archived from the original on 2020-09-29. Retrieved 2005-10-14.
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/National
Manifestations
Discriminatory
policies
Countermeasures
Related topics
Categories: