| Revision as of 22:52, 2 January 2010 editTroed (talk | contribs)203 edits comments on SPA claims← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:35, 10 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,157 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:JzG/Archive 218) (botTag: Manual revert |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|
I am almost certainly not interested. Really, I'm not. Is it about ]? No? Told you so. Not interested. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 19:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
| archiveheader = {{talkarchive}} |
|
|
| algo = old(7d) |
|
|
| archive = User talk:JzG/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
| counter = 218 |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 32K |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:TPS/banner}} |
|
|
{{collapse top|Discretionary sanctions}} |
|
|
{{Ds/aware|9/11|a-a|a-i|ab|acu|aerc|ap|at|os|b|blp|cam|cc|cid|e|ecig|fg|gc|gg|ggtf|gap|gmo|ipa|lr|lw|muh-im|old|pa|pr|ps|r-i|saq|sen|sci|tm|tpm|tt|we}} |
|
|
{{collapse bottom}} |
|
|
] |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=User talk:JzG/Archive index|mask=User talk:JzG/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Centralized discussion|width=30%}} |
|
|
{{Archive box |
|
|
| archivelist = <!-- /archivelist --> |
|
|
| auto = yes |
|
|
| index = Special:PrefixIndex/User_talk:JzG/Archive |
|
|
| search = yes |
|
|
| collapsible = yes |
|
|
| collapsed = yes |
|
|
| root = user talk:JzG |
|
|
| bot = MiszaBot |
|
|
| age = 7 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
Ah well. Hello from me anyway. Did you know my pic of Puffing Billy got featured in a hungarian railway magazine? ] (]) 20:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
;Smelling pistakes |
|
* Now I'm even more impressed. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 19:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:In addition to bone-deep burn scars on my left hand I now also have ], so my typing is particularly erratic right now. I have a spellcheck plugin but it can't handle larger text blocks. You're welcome to fix spelling errors without pinging me, but please don't change British to American spelling or indeed vice-versa. |
|
|
---- |
|
|
{{wikibreak}} |
|
|
== God Jul och Gott Nytt År! == |
|
|
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] is wishing you ]<br />Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ]<br />], ], ], ], ],<br />or the ],<br /> this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone. |
|
|
<br /> |
|
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ]! Are you still out there? == |
|
Welcome back to the asylum. ObHooke: a form of Hooke's Law can be used to describe the oscillation of a particle in a stratified fluid. (Yeah, that's lame but it's the best I can do.) ] (]) 02:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<!-- ] 09:57, 15 January 2032 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1957773473}} |
|
|
Hi ]! I was going through some old ArbCom cases and ran into one where you had added some statements. I realized that I haven't spoken to you in quite some time, and I see that you haven't made any edits since May... That sucks! I don't want to see someone like you go! If anything, I hope that you're doing well and that you're happy and that you'll someday return here. I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that I was thinking about you... Keep in touch. :-) ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 23:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I hope it goes without saying, despite the fact that I'm saying it, that many of us feel the same way. Happy new year ]] 23:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
== G'day Guy == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::We didn't cross paths very often lately, JzG, but we could really use you back. If you get the urge to return, please say "Yes!" <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
I wonder if you'd mind withdrawing your ]? - It's pretty much a 'snow' keep, I think? ] (]) 01:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::October JzG sighting at ]. Does my heart good. --] (]) 20:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Lovely to hear from you! I have spent the past two-and-a-bit years working at incredibly high stress for a hospital. In that time I have retired around 80% of their legacy application and server estate, instituted architectural guidelines and piloted the process for demand review, reduced the measured risk burden by around 80%, instituted objective risk monitoring using ], and I've just proposed (and had accepted) a plan to remediate or mitigate most of the rest. I have, in short, been busy in that there real life of which you read, and that really wasn't going to fit in with having to be nice to people who sincerely believe that Ashlii Babbit was the real victim of the "legitimate political discourse" on Jan 6 2020. |
|
|
::::I have a week's leave. I have 28 days to take before year end, having managed I think three days off this year so far (including weekends). And because I have an offshore team and an onshore customer, my working day can be 8am to 3am. |
|
|
::::I thought I'd drop in :-) ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 18:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Yikes, sounds like, umm..., a lot of responsibility. There will be plenty for you to do here when you are free! ] (]) 22:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Glad you dropped by! ] (]) 02:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Glad to hear you're OK - and busy, by the sounds of things! Hope you enjoy your break. ]] 11:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::If Guy doesn't look at ] real soon now, where Eddy is being accused of plagiarism, I may be forced to contact him on bookfarce. That would mean giving Guy my real name. He always forgets me. - ]the ] 16:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::I try never to remember people's RW names unless they are "out" on Misplaced Pages. Even when they out themselves, this has led to huge problems, e.g. with a user whose identity was revealed by accident off-wiki, showing him to be the source of fact-washing his own side in Misplaced Pages disputes via a journalist. That ended badly for everyone. ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 16:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Very happy see the little JzG! ] ] ] 19:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC). |
|
|
:::::Hah! Good to see you're still around! ] 20:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::This is a few months late, but welcome back! Wishing you well. ''']] (])''' 09:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:Welcome indeed! Just came across your signature ]. It's always great to run in to another 'old-timer'. Hope you're well, ] <sup><b>(])</b></sup> 11:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
` |
|
:''(Wanders along cobblestones twirling truncheon)'' 'ello, 'ello, 'ello..what's this then? A pommie using aussie lingo? Hmmm...just because you live in a nice aussie city and have a tan doesn't mean you can missapropriate an Australian welcome. ''(opens notebook to write out ticket for country of origin fraud. Fine: Privatemusings buys first round at next Sydney meetup...)''. cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 02:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Just arrived in Melbourne today. Haven't heard any "g'day"s yet -- quite disappointing (I've been listening out). But plenty of "mate." ] (]) 03:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::bad luck that you got Melbourne, not Sydney, short brig ;-) - and cas - if I have to buy a round for everytime I've said G'day on the wiki, the next meetup is going to be an incredibly boozy affair.... actually - that sounds about right :-) - make sure you've the 29th of this month in the diary - it's the WMAU AGM (I'm sure Guy and Short Brig. would be most welcome too)..... ] (]) 05:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:] SBHB? PS: Bainre is in Melb - if you come to Sydney, we can take you out for a beer. Tony1 is in Sydney too ;) ] (] '''·''' ]) 08:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* Anyone can snow close it if they like, the title was obviously the problem since that's what apparently caused the shortage of ghits. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 11:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::I don't think the title was the problem: gets almost 12,000 ghits. Best, <font color="#0000FF">]</font> 03:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: IThe search term is in the document. Regardless, my previous statement applies. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Skip banned == |
|
|
|
|
|
As you may remember we had a lot of problem regarding the technocracy page and Skip. The problems were taken to arbitration and it went against the majority of editors and in favour of Skip. Since then skip has cause more trouble on Misplaced Pages and has now been permanently banned (see http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts/archive75#User:Skipsievert_talk_page_postings). As a result I would now like to start work on the technocracy pages and try and get them back to something resembling academic standard. As step towards that I would like the NET web site removed from the banned list. Thanks. Dr. Wallace PhD <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
* Skipsievert was certainly not the only problem, the NET site was blocked due to relentless spamming by your fellow NET members. en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=65 is you, right? <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 17:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
** Skip was vandalising the page time and time again. There were a number of us trying to get it back to a good standard and we even took skip to arbitration. However, the arbitration went against us. It finally took 2 years before he got banned. Now we would like to start work on the technocracy pages again, remove Skip's POV and try and get it back to an academic standard if we can. That means we should also include NET. NET is an official legal organisation registered in Sweden. It is the only technocratic organisation in Europe and it is one of the longest running technocratic organisation outside of Tech Inc. as such any article on technocracy should mention it as well. Therefore, we will need NET removed form you spam list so we can include it again. Thanks. ] (]) 06:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::* So you think your bias is neutrality, and you want to go back to linking your site in support of it. Why do I feel there is something not quite right about that? <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
I hope you don't mind me chiming in. With regards to the Technocracy articles, I've been cleaning up some of them over the past week, and my main interest is in making sure that the articles remain NPOV (see ]) and have reliable, published, secondary sourcing (see ]). I'm not associated with any particular group and have outlined a few thoughts and my recent involvement at ]. Perhaps that could be a good place for some centralised discussion... ] (]) 08:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* Whatever. The NET site was blacklisted due to spamming by NET members, and here we have an NET officer asking for it to be removed so he can start adding it again. I'm not going to see that as anything other than the usual nonsense. I have no interest in the technocracy movement itself, and I don't think the NET website is a reliable source for anything other than NET, which was deleted as non-notable and has been re-deleted a couple of times since due to re-creation and in one case copyright infringement, {{la|Network of European Technocrats}}. Isenhand was involved in this nonsense, and did not as far as I can recall mention his ]. Isenhand is also a ] and I would not in the least regret sending him to join Skip on whatever external forum they choose to continue this off-wiki ]. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 08:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
** OK, I think we should move this over to arbitration. ] (]) 07:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::* Feel free to ask, don't forget to mention your external agenda and conflict of interest. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 16:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop == |
|
|
|
|
|
As you participated in the recent ] election, or in one of two ] that relate to the use of ] for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the ]. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.<br/> |
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
For the Arbitration Committee, <br/> |
|
|
] (]) 08:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
<!-- EdwardsBot 0005 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Deletion review close== |
|
|
Guy, I agree with you about the deletion of Adamantius, but you closed the deletion review after only a few hours, despite several comments by reliable eds. partally supporting the journal. I think this clearly wrong--there needs to be time for discussion. What can you possibly be thinking of? ''']''' (]) 18:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* There is no article right now, if anybody in good standing wants to create a new, different (i.e. sourced) article there is nothing stopping them; they could almost certainly get the deleted text just by asking if it would help (I have no opinion on that). The review was silly, and was not actually necessary in order to fix the problem. The way to fix it is a decent rework that addresses the reasons for deletion - IMO that review was not actually addressing the reasons for deletion and given the other surrounding issues was quite likely to degenerate into an AFD round 2 fight, as so often happens. But, you know, all actions on Misplaced Pages are unilateral and can be unilaterally reverted as long as good faith is assumed by all. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 19:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:I interpret that as no objection to my reverting, and I have accordingly reverted your closure. I think normal discussion the best course. ''']''' (]) 02:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Diff on workshop== |
|
|
Hey, Guy, I think your diff here: |
|
|
|
|
|
Florid rhetoric exaggerating the importance of your own favoured text () is disruptive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
was meant to be something else. It's the same as the next one. Regards, ] | ] 21:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC). |
|
|
* No, it was right: one part is the the proposed finding, one is my commentary. I think it is particularly egregious. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thanks == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarded for giving me a good laugh with . Thanks, mate! ;) ] (]) 21:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== View or restore 4,770 deleted edits? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Guy. Just clicked a diff for an old edit to your talk page, it errored, and then I noticed that you have nearly 5,000 revisions deleted. The deletion log doesn't really make it clear why this is, but would you mind if I restored the revisions? I've only seen deleted user talk pages for certain ] cases (and even then the practice is fairly controversial). --] (]) 01:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* Please mail me about that. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
** I've gone through and checked a good portion of the edits. Your user talk page history is... colorful, to say the least. A lot of banned users, vandalism, and general nastiness, though most of it isn't what would be considered "outside the course of business" for an admin. I left a about 60 revisions deleted. If you see any other revisions in the page history that are problematic, please contact ] (no normal admin will be able to act here, the page history is too unwieldy). Cheers. --] (]) 19:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
*** Thank you for your diligence. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== OTRS ticket query == |
|
|
|
|
|
Could you briefly summarize OTRS ticket 2008030210009128 referenced ? Thanks. ] (]) 21:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:sorry, I dropped access months ago, far too busy IRL. Is the user requesting unblock? If so, my immediate response would be no as she has never shown any sign of understanding ]. ]</b> <small>(])</small> 23:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: No, just persistantly talking about some conspiracy on my talk page. No skin. ] (]) 21:14, 10 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
You should definitely see the comments made by {{user|The Fat Man Who Never Came Back}} before the page is inevitably deleted because Bambenek cannot help but try to get an article on him written.—] (]) 08:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
and are also particularly rich.—] (]) 08:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* I would take that to the noticeboards, that and other comments indicate a serious case of ]. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
?—] (]) 20:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* ], take it to the noticeboards. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] ANI exhaustion == |
|
|
re: ] |
|
|
|
|
|
FYI: I'm momentarily exhausted from most recent ANI against *me* (dismissed) brought by supporter of the SPA. (The last ANI was my first—it reached strange conclusion which will be addressed— not about POV, but text formatting and number and size of messages — note: which were required to counterbalance SPA's behavior.)<p>I arrived as BLP/NPOV "current events wrangler" around 10/4 and have knowledge of patterns of all participants since arrest brought influx, and article locking.<p>SPA ANI has devolved into content dispute, but yes there is problem highlighted by topic title. Problem may also be visible in response at ANI by SPA. Combat. If my input is needed, I'll try. But need rest from ANI. ] (]) 20:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
* Follow-up: Very sleepy, but felt situation did require me being available for comment if desired. Posted such. In any case, happy holidays. ] (]) |
|
|
|
|
|
== yOU D OFUNNY THINGS :-) == |
|
|
|
|
|
Are yuou drunk????? We have collected over 70 legitimate source and we are going to have a little Bamabanecky-necky. there is nothing u can do to stop us. we are legion. Bambenek will be on Misplaced Pages, and he will rule all of us. :-D LOL. J/k. but we will be creating an excellent article. FEATURED STATUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--] (]) 18:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
* I don't care if someone does write an article on Bambenek, as long as it's not him doing it (as it has been every time so far in my experience). Certainly he seems to have a certain notoriety, having been voted Wanker of the Year by Daily Kos. Whether he's a notable wingnut or just a wingnut with a certain gift for self-promotion I will leave to others, the only absolutely certain thing is that the independent evaluation of his importance falls well below his own and always has. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 21:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Mediator? == |
|
|
|
|
|
You might have to walk me through that idea, I'm still kind of new with the whole Misplaced Pages business. <font color="Red">]</font> <sup><font color="Fuchsia">]</font> - Afkatk</sup> 23:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Ah sorry, about the above message I wasn't thinking totally straight when I added it here I did pretty much just wake up, but I get ya and I don't think theres much reason to continue that discussion. <font color="Red">]</font> <sup><font color="Fuchsia">]</font> - Afkatk</sup> 03:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== DYK for Norry == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|] |
|
|
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. |
|
|
|} ] (]) 03:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Japan Focus wrong protection== |
|
|
|
|
|
Can you remove protection at ] or replace it to a redirect with ] to correct your mistake for AFD. The magazine is a ] since it is a ] ] journal and have a separate article of its own. ] (]) 17:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:I noticed this request and created the redirect. --] (]) 18:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Cool. Now maybe you can explain what the hell the OP is on about. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==If you get a chance== |
|
|
Could you add your twopenneth ] and ]. Some editors believe that Nick Griffin is a reliable source for claiming the owners of national newspapers are attempting to start a civil war in Britain followed by a nuclear war against Arab states, other editors disagree. I'm sure you can work out which group I belong to before even looking at the discussions. Thanks. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 14:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* Nasty. I will make a comment or two. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Just so you know == |
|
|
|
|
|
Wknights proposal was supporting the shorter name. SM's was proposing we tack on player to the end of word etc. But probably doesn't matter since you removed your comment. -] (]) 15:25, 28 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* Yes, I worked that out after I waded through SM's comments and such but actually the whole thing will likely fix itself. It would be much better if the effort were devoted to removing the unnecessary forks at ] and ]. If there are really specific variations for given genres then have a subpage at ] that details only the differences. Actually I can't see any significant differences other than repeated attempts to legislate either a POV or the blindingly obvious. I suspect that nuking the forks would cure 90% of the problem. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
** Completely agree. I can't speak for the baseball page as I don't edit that project alot so not sure how it got created, but the sportspeople one sprouted out of SMs last attempt to legislate the obvious and ended up supporting the view opposite his through consensus building on the page. Frankly most of us would rather the discussion just be left alone and left to clue. Thanks for your input though, definitely like more people to see the discussion. -] (]) 15:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Response for ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I typed up a response to your note at ] - so I might as well paste it here: We already had the page name shorter. SMcCandlish is trying to remove the exception part of the line and then force baseball bio articles to have (baseball player) or (baseball coach) or (baseball player and coach), rather than the simple (baseball) that we currently use. I propose that the entire line be stricken - not just the exception portion - so then we won't be forced into using a "description" noun at all. The only guideline should be that whatever is shortest and simplest while still accomplishing disambiguation without confusion - and that is implicit without the line above. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">] ]</span> 15:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* Understood, see above. I made a start: ]. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Happy New Year! == |
|
|
|
|
|
Best wishes. <span style="color:Purple; font-size:11pt;">☺</span>] (]) 15:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Regarding SPA == |
|
|
|
|
|
It's increasingly looking as if I never will (my next action, described on the talk page, was to clean up the corrupt references at ). I created an account on Misplaced Pages in 2007, after having spotted problems in an article when reading it. I've never been especially active, but I've made contributions to talk pages and articles in completely random subjects after having seen the need (eight different subjects, in total). After two and a half years I make the first contribution I'm proud of, removing incredibly bad sources from statements that hasn't even got support from those - bad - sources, and replace with a consensus in the correct section and with good sources. After that I went back to other completely non-climate related articles. Now you used that edit, which I was proud of, as something negative about the (single) article edits I'm currently involved with. I feel incredibly put down by this. Again. This account is my only account. In my real name. Created in early 2007. Has been used for contributions on various subjects unrelated to what you claim it's a "single purpose account" for two and a half years. But as I understand it, if that's really how you want to characterize me there's nothing I can do about it. I just wanted to express my sincere disappointment. :( ] (]) 22:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC) |
|
.jpg)
