Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Tonica Marlow: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:03, 10 January 2010 editM0RD00R (talk | contribs)6,187 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:38, 12 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(15 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ''']''' (]) 00:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Tonica Marlow}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tonica Marlow}}|2=AfD statistics}}) :{{la|Tonica Marlow}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tonica Marlow}}|2=AfD statistics}})
:({{findsources|Tonica Marlow}}) :({{findsources|Tonica Marlow}})
] ] Not clearly notable. Most references are to church newsletters. Author of book, but the book has no Misplaced Pages article and is not particularly notable ] (]) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC) ] ] Not clearly notable. Most references are to church newsletters. Author of book, but the book has no Misplaced Pages article and is not particularly notable ] (]) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Line 10: Line 16:
Keep. --] (]) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Keep. --] (]) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' "Tova Mordechai" search yields 8 gbook and 36 gnews hits. Does it make her notable? Not sure. I've seen less notable articles kept, and more notable deleted. Also it is worth saying that this article is mentioned at the current Arbitration proceedings . Some participants might want it temporarily be kept as an evidence. ] (]) 20:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC) *'''Comment''' "Tova Mordechai" search yields 8 gbook and 36 gnews hits. Does it make her notable? Not sure. I've seen less notable articles kept, and more notable deleted. Also it is worth saying that this article is mentioned at the current Arbitration proceedings . Some participants might want it temporarily be kept as an evidence. ] (]) 20:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. I added several references from reliable sources, including one reference from the ]. I think notability is firmly established. If the article is kept, it should be moved to ], the name by which she is best known. I do not think that the article unduly promotes a particular point of view, but any inappropriate external links can be removed if there is a consensus to do so. - ] (]) 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
:] lists 50 holdings for ''To play with fire'' (©2002), 13 holdings for ''Playing with fire'' (1991), and 6 for ''Goodnight my friend Aleph''. - ] (]) 21:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
::The book is probably more notable than the author. I could see having an article about the book. --] (]) 06:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
::: John, feel free to repurpose the article and move to a new title along those lines, that is probably a good idea. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 21:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)\
::::But if we would assume that her book is notable then per ] wouldn't author herself be notable as well? ] (]) 05:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' This person has accomplished nothing to make her worthy of an article in ''any'' encyclopedia, on-line or not. ] (]) 06:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' Books did not generate reviews, cited news articles are local coverage of speaking engagements rather than significant coverage of the individual. ] (]) 09:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] 00:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*'''Delete''' per above. <span style="font-family:Batik Regular;"><big>''']''' - ]</big></span> 21:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 18:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)</small>
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 03:38, 12 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Tonica Marlow

Tonica Marlow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO WP:NOTE Not clearly notable. Most references are to church newsletters. Author of book, but the book has no Misplaced Pages article and is not particularly notable John Nagle (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Book is not in top 1 million on Amazon. "Tonica Marlow" has 4 hits in Google News archives. Zero hits in Google Scholar. No notability other than book. --John Nagle (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep. --Apollo789 (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Comment "Tova Mordechai" search yields 8 gbook and 36 gnews hits. Does it make her notable? Not sure. I've seen less notable articles kept, and more notable deleted. Also it is worth saying that this article is mentioned at the current Arbitration proceedings . Some participants might want it temporarily be kept as an evidence. M0RD00R (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. I added several references from reliable sources, including one reference from the Jerusalem Post. I think notability is firmly established. If the article is kept, it should be moved to Tova Mordechai, the name by which she is best known. I do not think that the article unduly promotes a particular point of view, but any inappropriate external links can be removed if there is a consensus to do so. - Eastmain (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Worldcat lists 50 holdings for To play with fire (©2002), 13 holdings for Playing with fire (1991), and 6 for Goodnight my friend Aleph. - Eastmain (talk) 21:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
The book is probably more notable than the author. I could see having an article about the book. --John Nagle (talk) 06:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
John, feel free to repurpose the article and move to a new title along those lines, that is probably a good idea. Guy (Help!) 21:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)\
But if we would assume that her book is notable then per WP:AUTHOR wouldn't author herself be notable as well? M0RD00R (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.