| Revision as of 18:54, 13 January 2010 view sourceLAz17 (talk | contribs)6,728 edits →HELP HELP HELP← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024 view source MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,134,948 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{pp-protected|small=yes}} | |||
| {{notice|'''Note:''' I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there. | |||
| <small>A {{tl|ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{tl|Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed.</small> | |||
| Note to '''new and non-logged-in editors''': Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be ]. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "<nowiki>{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}</nowiki>" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 33 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |minthreadsleft = 3 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 3 | |minthreadstoarchive = 3 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 17: | ||
| {| class="infobox" width="315px" | {| class="infobox" width="315px" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| ! align="center" | |
! align="center" | {{/Archives}} | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| {{bots|deny= |
{{bots|deny=SineBot}} | ||
| '''Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here''' | |||
| {{notice|Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – ] ] 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC) }} | |||
| == Ban Appeal Notification == | |||
| You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Appeal_of_an_Unjust_Topic-Ban and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
| * ]; | |||
| * ]. | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Thanks. | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| :OK, I added source declarations. I think that the article of Athens should have a collage as its primary photo but this image is rather narrow for the infobox. Would you agree if I created a new, wider one? ] (]) 13:20, 14 December 2009 | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| == 149.254.49.20 == | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| I have unblocked {{Userlinks|149.254.49.20}}. There are no open ports at this time. If trouble develops feel free to block it again. ] ] 19:16, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| == RE:File permission problem with File:Tbilisi Old District.jpg == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| The photograph in question is my own work. The problem here is that since I could not resize the image because of not having an appropriate software at that time, I captured the photo on my screen. I sadly do not have the time to remove the computer mouse that got caught up in the shot but I will work on it sometime in the future. I can not give you any more proof besides stating that I am the author and this is the license I choose for my work.--] (]) 22:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :How exactly do you want me to prove that the person listed and shown on the photograph is me? Do you want me to take picture of myself with the hard copy of this photograph in my hand, yelling that its me or what? --] (]) 23:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please see ] and the following item. On the basis of Satt 2's claims about these images, which he evidently did not take himself despite his claims, most of the image uploads of Satt 2 are probably copyvios. Independently he has already been quite problematic in his edits to ] and ] on two separate occasions. ] (]) 14:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Thanks for hunting these down, good job. Uploader is now blocked. ] ] 19:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Macedonia in La Francophonie == | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| ==Happy Adminship Anniversary!== | |||
| == A Question == | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| Can this image be transferred to WikiCommons or is it a copy vio in your view (ie. not personally made by the uploader)? I ask you this since you have had some interaction with the uploader and may know his/her work. It would be a valuable addition to Commons if it is a legitimate photo. Thank You, --] (]) 06:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| | name = Happy Adminship | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| == Your opinion == | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #c5c5ec, #bfd1f2, #a9efea); | |||
| It would be of great help if you give your own opinion about these small conflicts that happened recently: , and . Thanks in advance,--] (]) 14:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| ::Plus, I do not want to believe that they work together, since they write same arguments on the two talk pages.--] (]) 15:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your ]. Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Some help needed == | |||
| I noted this contributors uploads, were possible for commons: | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&contribs=user&target=Koliri&namespace=6 | |||
| but in tagging them up I found some of the captions were what I think is Greek? | |||
| Would you be willing to look through them, and get anything that can go on Commons up to standard | |||
| and moved? ( And some IMO unjustified FFD's resolved) | |||
| ] (]) 17:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Question == | |||
| I have nominated ], ], ] and ] on the grounds that they do not meet ] as virtually nothing about theme exists in the literature. Along comes ] bombarding the pages in question with sources, all of them in Albanian and impossible to access (let alone evaluate), except for one: Robert Elsie . Yet on looking closer, these four individuals do not appear ''anywhere'' in Elsie's page. --] (]) 20:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Your help appreciated == | |||
| Per as far as information "word-for-word copy-paste job" is not true and "replaced some cited sections of the article with copyvios" also not true. I really don't know what the modified text with names and tonnage of vessells can be deemed as copyvios". While adding a word "Murmansk" as "copyvios" - it's really something new for me - please advice were is the margine between copyvios and original research. Thanks.] (]) 16:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Also would be great if you advice me a correct name for such edit - - in source "German tanker JAN WELLEM (11,776grt) departed Murmansk during the evening of 6 April for Narvik". While in article now appeared as the ''11,776 tonne ''Jan Wellem'' that had sailed to Narvik from the secret German naval base ] at ] in the ] on 6 April''. I guess ]? Thanks] (]) 17:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Damiens.rf and rollback == | |||
| *I'm sorry, everyone is entittled to a "rollback" mistake. It won't happen again. My apologies to those concerned. ] (]) 23:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| One less agenda account. A small victory for the project, but a victory nonetheless. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 14:16, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Topic ban == | |||
| I saw your topic ban on my talk page, and I would like to ask you to reconsider. You said that "displays a reckless disregard for NPOV and is therefore disruptive." Why does it display a reckless regard for NPOV? Are you aware that it included the summaries of the older DoE reports which I had originally proposed to exclude from the introduction, after discussion about whether those summaries should also be included? The remainder of the text proposed in that edit is a summary of the most recent peer-reviewed ] from an academic publisher on the topic. | |||
| I know things can get difficult when the prevailing position on a controversial topic on which both sides have firm positions is suddenly opposed by the peer-reviewed secondary academic sources. That is exactly what is occurring now, and I urge you to take a close look at the sources before making a final decision on what is or is not NPOV. Thank you for taking a closer look. ] (]) 18:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Reverts == | |||
| == editing after topic ban ends == | |||
| If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Can you please have a look at the editing of ] over at ]? You had imposed a on him 2 month and 2 days ago. Since it ended, he has restarted editing there, in a questionable way. For example, he re-inserted several statements, despite a to remove them. | |||
| : Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their ]?), thanks for helping deal with them. ] ] 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| The last two months had seen a stop to the constant edit warring at that article which had been going on for almost a year before (please check the ). I fear that it is on track to decend into revert wars again. --] (]) 22:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| : Yes, I've been watching the situation. With H.W. it's sometimes difficult to find the exact point where merely opinionated and hyperactive editing turns into tendentious and disruptive editing, so I haven't yet quite made up my mind about how to proceed. However, H.W. should certainly familiarise himself with the idea that if one is topic-banned from an area and then returns, one is expected to ''change'' one's behaviour, and not simply continue with the exact same pattern of activity as before. ] ] 09:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| == AfD == | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| Regarding the Richard Tylman AfD, is there any way to solicit the opinions of uninvolved editors, to prevent the political issues from having any effect? ] ]</font> 23:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| == Comment == | |||
| ] | |||
| As you blocked one individual for the topic ban violation, please dont forget to remove his vote on RfD page ; one similar case was already implemented . Cheers, ] (]) 07:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Yep, I'm aware of that; I'm only a bit reluctant to do this because I voted on the AfD myself previously. My block of Pawel was not for this particular edit, but for a whole number of other edits that breached his topic ban in a much more obvious ways; the AfD edit is arguably more borderline and so I'll prefer to not take a stance on whether the vote should be removed at this point. ] ] 09:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, understood. Perhaps admin who imposed a topic ban, should judge about that vote on RfD? ] (]) 09:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| == More on Cold Fusion == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Please see my comment given . --] (]) 19:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| : Give it up. The community has spoken, this case is closed. And you, with your well-documented history of disruptive wikilawyering, are hardly the best person to convince people of the need to reconsider. Pcarbonn is free to appeal his ban with the Arbcom sub-committee. I plan to close and archive that noticeboard thread fairly soon, so don't waste your breath. ] ] 20:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == HELP HELP HELP == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Ceha is starting to intimidate me. Please but please keep an eye out so that there will be no problems. Please. (] (]) 18:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)). | |||
| : Uhm, he made one single edit asking you about your topic ban. Hardly a reason for drama. Nevertheless, I have commented there, hopefully to clarify things and help avoid escalation. ] ] 18:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: Surely you can see through this. This was his only edit in a month. And it particularily targets me. I am 100% certain that he is a sock puppet. Off of his regular account he just glanced at what I was doing and then logged into his Ceha account. He was banned for sock-puppetry in the past. (] (]) 18:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)). | |||
| </div> | |||
| Second question. How on earth is adding demographic data part of the topic ban? In no way is that related to cartography. I just transfered census data onto the page. There is absolutely nothing controversial there. I have regularily been doing this on many municipalities thoughout the republics of the former yugoslavia and nobody ever had an issue with it. (] (]) 18:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)). | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024
 | Note: I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.
A {{ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed. Note to new and non-logged-in editors: Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be semi-protected. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC) |
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 | Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC) |  |
Reverts
If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their LTA entry?), thanks for helping deal with them. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)