Misplaced Pages

User talk:ChyranandChloe: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:18, 17 January 2010 editMalcolmMcDonald (talk | contribs)1,214 edits →Global Warming← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:55, 12 July 2024 edit undoDavey2010 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers142,512 edits Notification: listing of Template:Gallery/aux at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(28 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Not around|3=15 July 2010}}
__NOTOC__<div style="background:#F7FAFF;padding:16px;"><div style="background:#F6F8FF;padding:8px;"><div style="background:#F5F6FF;padding:4px;"><div style="background:#F4F4FF;padding:2px;"><p class="plainlinks" align="right">''''''''''</p> __NOTOC__<div style="background:#F7FAFF;padding:16px;"><div style="background:#F6F8FF;padding:8px;"><div style="background:#F5F6FF;padding:4px;"><div style="background:#F4F4FF;padding:2px;"><p class="plainlinks" align="right">''''''''''</p>
{| class="collapsible collapsed messagebox small-talk" style="width:260px;margin:0;" {| class="collapsible collapsed messagebox small-talk" style="width:260px;margin:0;"
Line 8: Line 9:
<br /> <br />
<br /> <br />
<br />
|}{{clear}} |}{{clear}}
<!-- END OF TALK PAGE CUSTOM FORMATTING. MESSAGES GO BELOW THIS LINE. --> <!-- END OF TALK PAGE CUSTOM FORMATTING. MESSAGES GO BELOW THIS LINE. -->
{{Wikibreak}}


== ] is back ==
== Inline discussion preload ==


Hello,
Hey Cac, thanks for the preload - that's awesome. I didn't even know about that feature! ]<sup>]</sup> 19:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
We at WikiProject Viruses noticed that you used to be a participant of the project before the project went inactive. We would like to take this opportunity to invite you to become a participant of WikiProject Viruses again. We believe that viruses are an extremely important part of an encyclopedia, and that is why we need you! Our new project coordinator is {{User|Thomas888b}}.<br>
:Yeah, I was going through the templates; are you planning on creating a new footer for the Sing post? I was going through the code and found that, with a few parse functions, you could cut all the parameters — which would, well, automate everything. I think you understand that BASEPAGENAME and SUBPAGENAME can be included into the called template. As for the date, you could use the #time function, such that <nowiki>{{#time: Y-m-d|{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|2}} -7 days}}</nowiki>; this would return last issue's date and you could insert that into the url. Ultimately, and of course, you could keep the parameters are "overrides". I could write it all in if you want, I promise not to break anything. ;) ] (]) 19:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
We hope you seriously consider our invitation. See you there.
::I'm happy for you to experiment - although it's important that older editions are not affected, so bear that in mind. Also, not every signpost is exactly 7 days apart, hence why next/prev dates are manually specified. It's also best to propose major changes on ] first, so as not to confuse contributors and readers. Something I'd be interested to set up would be a redirect, or maybe just a noinclude header in the preload; currently after leaving a comment you get dumped on the talk page. You should add yourself under Design & templates on our ] table, your parser/template/wikimarkup knowledge is awesome and it'd great to have you help out on a regular basis! ]<sup>]</sup> 14:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
'''If you are interested in joining our crew again, please place a notice on ], or you will be removed from our participants list.'''
::*I could actually do with your help. I'm setting up a task list with multiple statuses for upcoming ''Signpost'' issues; it's currently at ]. Everything seems to be set up and working, apart from one thing. If you only fill in, say, 7 tasks, the remaining three will still display as empty rows. I've tried to use an <nowiki>{{#if:}}</nowiki> check to see if <nowiki>{{{Task7}}}</nowiki> is present, but nothing output at all then. If you could help me out, I'd be super grateful. The code that needs some sort of conditional check is at ], around each ]. Many thanks, ]<sup>]</sup> 21:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
:Well, the idea I had was "assuming defaults" if no values were entered, but those pages that use those templates are maintained by a small group of editors, so I guess that it's probably not necessary. Can the page be redirected back? I'm not sure, I don't think so, ]. I've cleaned up your code and added a parse functions, unused rows will not display. I don't know if I want to be a back up or have regular responsibilities; I've got other responsibilities. For one, this is a though year, Misplaced Pages-wise I'm looking at set of templates that might be merged. If you want to help, here's the discussion. It'll be good for you, maybe you can look at issues with templates other than those used on the Signpost. :P ] (]) 23:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
::Wow. I'm in awe. Thanks so much for helping me, I apologise if my botchy code upset you! I'm just getting to grips with MediaWiki code, so my efforts tend to be a bit hit-and-miss at the moment. I'll certainly keep an eye on that talk page and if there's anywhere I can help, I'll do my best. ]<sup>]</sup> 00:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
:::You're welcome. :) ] (]) 01:53, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 21:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC).</small>
== Talkback ==
<!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. -->
== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> -'''''—&nbsp;]<span style="color:darkblue">&nbsp;</span>'''''<sup>]</sup> 17:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


== maximum ride the final warning ==
{{talkback|Awickert|ts=17:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)}}
Since I just got back and didn't reply right away, this is to let you know that I replied on my talk. ] (]) 17:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
:Huh. Now I actually replied. I must have messed up hitting "save page". Whaddayaknow. ] (]) 09:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


I am so with you!--] (]) 19:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==


== ha ==
] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;"
|-
|valign=top|
;Stubs:<!--''']:'''-->
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
:]
|align=top|
;Cleanup
:]
:]
:]
;Merge
:]
:]
:]
;Add Sources
:]
:]
:]
;Wikify
:]
:]
:]
;Expand
:]
:]
:]
|}

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.

If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on ]. Thanks from ], SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on ]. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ] (]) 21:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

== Holy War ==

{{Talkback|Leevanjackson}}

== tobacco ==

Hiya CaC,
It is not a big deal, but my observations on tobacco harvesting come from personal experience. This is not a field in which I study, so I cannot give you sources off hand. Nonetheless, I note that the paragraph from which I cited has no references. Nitpicking perhaps, but there are a lot of migrant workers, and rural Kentuckians that might take issue with being called "single piece farm equipment". The only machinery I have seen involved in cultivation are setters (also used for peppers and other crops), and wagons, both of which are pulled by tractors. Pretty primitive and labor intensive process in general.
Anyway, I appreciate that you have posted an informative general piece on tobacco. Just thought I would throw my two cents in.
Cheers,
Tim <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Thanks Tim, replied on ]. ] (]) 07:06, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

== DYK for List of Ebola outbreaks ==


{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|-
|]
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>(])</sub> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
|} ] (]) 03:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

== Re: AGW and such ==

You must feel pretty strongly about this. I'm sorry that I sort of blew you off in my last comment, but please explain. In addition to global temperature peaks, you mentioned bias from the IPCC. ] (]) 06:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't feel as strongly as I might have come off. However, after reading the edit you made to the talk page, I can't help but believe you think I'm trying to disprove global warming in general, or something. About the IPCC bias, it's mostly their use of CRU data. While they haven't exactly had the chance to seriously address the fact that they drew conclusions in part on fudged or unreliable data, I get a nagging suspicion that they're going to do the intelligent thing and throw out all CRU input as a way to demonstrate neutrality. The IPCC does not necessarily need to change its conclusions to remain neutral, but it certainly must change its premises - that being, that CRU is reliable. I mean, citing a scientific source that admits to have fudged data about a current scientific issue is like citing Fox News on conservatism. ] (]) 08:20, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

:No, not at all. I was following Mikenorton's lead wondering whether you've read FAQ 3 or were listening. ] is a much better proposal, although, if I may critique, the "<citation(s) here>" literally tells me: you're too lazy to do the research, or too opinionated to hold a good faith discussion. This isn't anything personal, it's just that I've seen ''a lot'' of proposals like this before, and I know what the old-time editors are looking for. Beyond that, it's wording, but your probably sick of my two cents on this, right? Yeah, the 's stigmatized, but you got remember that and keep independent data sets. You mentioned fudged data, please explain, I mean where did you get that? Besides the point, your proposal has merit. Right now the talk page's too polarized for good faith, do you want to move it here? I can look at it, and when the talk page cools down I can help you git through. ] (]) 05:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
::The main reason I put <citation here> in a few places is because if I put in actual reference tags, MediaWiki would've freaked out and told the viewer of the article that the code is malformed, and I didn't want to clutter the page with exact wiki code. That's all. ] (]) 16:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
:::I see. Well thank you. ] (]) 07:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

== Added questions ==

Are you aware of the vast pile of bad faith that is ] and surrounds? ] (]) 08:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
:That's why my questions don't involve platitude. Look, I support you, but it's not your supporters I would be worried about. Yeah, bad faith, if you don't feel comfortable answer there I'm fine with here. I didn't realize the deadline, sorry about that. If you don't feel like answering, I'm okay with that. Commented on your discussions page. Good luck. ] (]) 06:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
:: I think you are missing the point. I'd like to remove your questions - I did for GR, but he raised such a silly stink that I'd rather not do the same. I'd rather you removed them yourself ] (]) 08:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
:: And, thank you kindly for your statement ] (]) 09:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
::: Re : thanks ] (]) 23:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
::::You're welcome. You know I do still appreciate a response. ] (]) 23:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

==Baseless discussions==
Hi CaC, you didn't reply at my TP, did you read my comment? is an example of what I find irritating. A lot of talk, yet neither side tries to give their arguments weight by reading the literature. Imho such discussions are a waste of time for everyone. ] (]) 10:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
:Yeah. It's been a while, kind of fresh out of mind, replied on your talk. ] (]) 23:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

== Your valued opinion on section naming ==

We ]
about the subject of how to name sections.
I find myself without a decent debate to my
recent insight about naming article sections in general.
During our past discussion, and having read and your links pertaining to that discussion,
I found your analytical skills to be respectable.

Would you please consider the merit of this idea for Misplaced Pages:

* For articles whose subject may include many competing products, section names should not ''normally'' contain the products names. Such sections might be better named more permanently. Any link to any section may become more structural than even ] or ], because changing a section name later can become more difficult than changing the structural elements in a category or outline. Notability guidelines do not directly limit the content of articles, and structuring by product name encourages size, tempts ], and may increase bias and zealous editing in such articles.

After all, WP Layout and WP MOS share similar concerns,
and I note you and WhatAmIdoing are regulars at WP Layout discussions.
Care to join this ]?
Thanks anyway. &mdash; ]] 20:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
:I'm sorry, but I'm busy right now. This is a quick analysis, but this is what I see.<ol><li>Editors ask how, how do I determine whether products names would be an appropriate header? Spend more time defining a criteria, you've got "normally"; maybe "reasonable", "notable", "in non-controversial cases" (negated appropriated, of course).</li><li>"might be" is weak. The guideline needs to be clear and sure. Strive to break it down to one word: "is". While witting ], WhatamdIdoing and I strove to look for the clearest wording.</li><li>You've probably read ], ]? ]? One issue I see emerging here is what Orwell saw in his policymakers in his day. Besides his politics, he did make several important . When you have the time, give it a read. Sentence three "Any link to any section may" seems kind of ambiguous and ], try to be ]. I think you might also be able to (1) omit it or (2) propose it separately.</li><li>Like the previous, the last half of the last sentence is probably unnecessary. It sounds like your trying to ''defend'' the guideline. In disputes, guidelines and polices are used as ]. They expect guidelines to be already well thought-out, and in no need of further explanation. Or if they do need explanation, its better to have them come to the discussion and have it clearly drawn out. Of course it's probably not worth a total omission. A new practice I've seen is putting those defenses in a <nowiki><ref></nowiki>.</li></ol>This is what I can give you, if its not enough, feel free to ask again. ] (]) 05:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


I just read your response to my global warming article protest. I was pretty clear what i thought should be added. The entire article is ipcc. Thats bias off the bat. The sole goal of the ipcc was to find human impact on tbe environment. Their word was treated like gospel in this article.. years ago. Youre not in good faith.. and i didnt need to do this either. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The goose whose fingers fly off the golden eggs. I thank you. &mdash; ]] 05:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
:And the farmer who put the ax the goose thinking that there's be more golden eggs, I hope you realize that doesn't end well (here's if you don't want to read), except rather than dealing with greed we deal with what we call in the psychology department: ], which, clinically, is characterized by weakened activity in the ]. (Like ], don't participate in one of those early day psychology experiments where they'd put ] in your brain to figure out what happened when a part ''didn't work''.) ] (]) 06:04, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


== ] Revival ==
::One dose of optimism bias weakens processing and memory of emotional reactions, but has that story's psychoactive radiation. One dose of ] and then it's OK. It's a big world, and an even bigger story. I can also live with ''Misplaced Pages is forever'': though it's not really true, it motivates.


You have previously shown an interest in ] by adding your name to our ]. We are currently reviving the project, and would be grateful if you could indicate whether you are still interested in contributing or not on our ]. You do not need to have expertise in virology to contribute to our project, as we welcome people with any degree of knowledge of the subject.<br> Thank you.
::In '''chapter two''', ] gets a ''Section titles'' part. Cpiral and company gather all the section naming material from ''Layout'' and ''Manual of Style'' and have fun with the {{tl|naming conventions|title=Specific-topic guidelines}} template.
::There is no coherent naming guideline for section titles, yet section naming is just as structural to an encyclopedia as are its outline and its categories. This is because the name of a section determines:
::* the outline of the article;
::* the growth pattern of the article;
::* the articles that spin-off of the ] when it outgrows itself;
::* the link precision of inter-article links made by editors who only go by titles, and not content.
::There is no ''what links here'' for sections and so currently we have at ]:
:::* When linking to a section, as a courtesy, go to that article's section and leave an editor's note to remind others that the title is linked. List the names of the linking articles, so that if the title is altered, others can fix the links without having to perform exhaustive searches.
::::For example:
::::<code><nowiki> ==Evolutionary implications<!--This section is linked from ] and ]-->== </nowiki></code>


<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 17:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC).</small>
::Seems both '']'' and '']'' are yet primitive, chapter one-ish, because they've not yet been seen in the larger sense. In the '''chapter three''', Misplaced Pages, becomes a literary machine that provides linking at the ] level.
<!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. -->


== Tobacco Politics page ==
::I guess I'm trying to get Misplaced Pages from the articulation level of '''chapter one''', ''Growth'', to the sectional level of chapter two, ''Structure: The naming, content, and linking of sections titles''. Our duty to basic content is to describe the sources, but our duty to this wiki is to our outline, our categories, our linking, and ''our sectionalization''. I know I'm trying to save future editors the hassle of restructuring the foundation while the house is sitting o'top. &mdash; ]] 23:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


Hey, I see that you are the person who has disputed the neutral POV of the Tobacco Politics page. Do you think we could discuss this? Seems like we should be able to get this done since the dispute was last discussed in 2009? When will you be back from your 'break'?
:::But what if I like my job restructuring articles? Job stealer... I think we're on the same ship. I'm not sure what you want me to say, I do keep logs of the articles I've restructured, if you want me send you the links, just ask. ] (]) 02:37, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


] (]) 20:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
::::Oh, Chy! OK, send a couple o' ropes to your logs, I'm working on a draft and could a real, live sighting. &mdash; ]] 06:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
== Orphaned non-free media (File:HOSA Logo.svg) ==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 04:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
:The commentary/log , the article . ] (]) 08:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
::{{thank you}} &mdash; ]] 17:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Help with ]-related content ==


Saw you were a valuable asset to the Misplaced Pages community, then left. I've added you to the page above, and if you come back, please remember to take your name off it. God bless, ''']]]''' 22:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I am looking for more help at the ], particularly with our new ]? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---] (]) 14:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


==Interesting issue of copy and pasting==
==Page move==
Hey ChyranandChloe Have come across a major textbook that has copied your work. I am wanting the textbook company to release the book under a CC BY SA license. Wondering if you would be interested in being involved. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
C+C, could you please undo your move of "Public opinion on climate change" to "Public opinion on global warming," pending further discussion? I could give reasons for keeping the current name here but think the discussion would be better on the article talk page. ] (]) 01:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:FAQ group begin ==
:So sorry, no one replied in ], and since everyone's active today I assumed you all knew. Revert's done. ] (]) 01:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 10:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
::Thanks, I hadn't noticed the discussion there. ] (]) 01:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Notahelpdesk ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 14:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Happy new year ==


Hi,<br>
{{new Year}} &mdash; ]] 00:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 -->


== Nominating cnote templates for merge ==
== Thank YOU ==
Dear ChyranandChloe: Thank you so much for archiving the discussion page of the usability wiki. It is much much easier to go through the discussion topics after the page had been archived. I have been wondering who did it and just encountered your comment. Please pardon my belated "thank you" note. --] (]) 00:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
:You're welcome, I expect good things from the Usability Initiate though. ] (]) 00:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


Hi! The {{tl|cnote}} templates has been nominated for merging with the {{tl|efn}}/{{tl|notelist}} family of templates. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you. ] (] | ]) 06:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
== "Tobacco (disambiguation)" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Tobacco (disambiguation)'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:ViralZone ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 02:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
== Global Warming ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 08:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Please could you use edit summaries on reverts such as on articles on Probation? However obvious the revert is to you and edit summary helps stop escalation into edit war --] ] 07:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
: Edit summaries are good. But in this case it is hard to criticise C&C because the added text is so obviously unacceptable to anyone familiar with the topic ] (]) 10:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> –]<sup>]</sup> 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::That particular addition was not "obviously unacceptable". In fact, some part of the discussion Prof Latif (of the "renowned Leibniz Institute at Germany’s Kiel University") has entered into is necessary to the article if it's not to look partial and uniformative. It would be much more useful to remind editors that it is rude and unhelpful to re-factor the TalkPage comments of others and that they should refrain from passing comments on other editors. ] (]) 12:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:55, 12 July 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. ChyranandChloe has not edited Misplaced Pages since 15 July 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Click here to leave a new message

Talk archives

2008-10-24
2008-12-13
2009-01-02
2009-06-07
2009-09-21
2010-03-16

ChyranandChloe is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.

WikiProject Viruses is back

Hello, We at WikiProject Viruses noticed that you used to be a participant of the project before the project went inactive. We would like to take this opportunity to invite you to become a participant of WikiProject Viruses again. We believe that viruses are an extremely important part of an encyclopedia, and that is why we need you! Our new project coordinator is Thomas888b (talk · contribs).
We hope you seriously consider our invitation. See you there. If you are interested in joining our crew again, please place a notice on Our Talkpage, or you will be removed from our participants list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 21:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cref2

Template:Cref2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -— Gadget850 (Ed)  17:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

maximum ride the final warning

I am so with you!--Silentmaid (talk) 19:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

ha

I just read your response to my global warming article protest. I was pretty clear what i thought should be added. The entire article is ipcc. Thats bias off the bat. The sole goal of the ipcc was to find human impact on tbe environment. Their word was treated like gospel in this article.. years ago. Youre not in good faith.. and i didnt need to do this either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gcburns (talk • contribs) 05:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Virus Revival

You have previously shown an interest in Wikiproject Viruses by adding your name to our List of Participants. We are currently reviving the project, and would be grateful if you could indicate whether you are still interested in contributing or not on our Talk Page. You do not need to have expertise in virology to contribute to our project, as we welcome people with any degree of knowledge of the subject.
Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 17:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC).

Tobacco Politics page

Hey, I see that you are the person who has disputed the neutral POV of the Tobacco Politics page. Do you think we could discuss this? Seems like we should be able to get this done since the dispute was last discussed in 2009? When will you be back from your 'break'?

99.52.210.18 (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:HOSA Logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:HOSA Logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Missing Wikipedians

Saw you were a valuable asset to the Misplaced Pages community, then left. I've added you to the page above, and if you come back, please remember to take your name off it. God bless, LazyBastardGuy 22:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Interesting issue of copy and pasting

Hey ChyranandChloe Have come across a major textbook that has copied your work. I am wanting the textbook company to release the book under a CC BY SA license. Wondering if you would be interested in being involved. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FAQ group begin

Template:FAQ group begin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Notahelpdesk

Template:Notahelpdesk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominating cnote templates for merge

Hi! The {{cnote}} templates has been nominated for merging with the {{efn}}/{{notelist}} family of templates. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 06:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

"Tobacco (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tobacco (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Tobacco (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ViralZone

Template:ViralZone has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Prevalence of tobacco consumption country table

Template:Prevalence of tobacco consumption country table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gallery/aux

Template:Gallery/aux has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Davey2010 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Categories: