Revision as of 16:53, 21 January 2010 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits →A reasonable rate: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:06, 7 April 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,295,546 editsm Archiving 73 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people/Phase I/Archive 2, Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people/Phase I/Archive 1, Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people/Phase I/Archive 3) (botTag: Replaced | ||
(921 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
Let's try to keep it civil and succinct, eh? | |||
| algo = old(7d) | |||
| archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people/Phase I/Archive %(counter)d | |||
== Alphabetize views == | |||
| counter = 3 | |||
| maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
Would it make sense to alphabetize the views by username? I've never really liked the idea of chronological ordering, as I think it unfairly favors earlier views too much. --] (]) 16:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
==Collaborative views== | |||
| minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
Could we have a go at establishing some collaboratively edited views? I can see the volume of individual, partially overlapping, partially contradicting views spiralling into ] extremely quickly. Perhaps this could be in a separate section at the bottom. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
{{archives|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=7}} | |||
== NOINDEX == | |||
Unfortunately NOINDEX is disabled in article space. That can't be done without some fairly serious changes and risks. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== A reasonable rate == | |||
I think prodding 100 unreferenced BLP articles per day would be reasonable. If there are a few thousand, that will remove the backlog within a few months. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:06, 7 April 2021
Archives | |||
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |