| Revision as of 19:06, 5 January 2006 editJmax- (talk | contribs)910 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:31, 30 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete'''. ]] 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| non-notable concept with a single homepage hosted at ]. ] 07:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | non-notable concept with a single homepage hosted at ]. ] 07:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' with ]; this doesn't deserve an article in its own right. -- ] |
*'''Merge''' with ]; this doesn't deserve an article in its own right. -- ] 07:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **Which bits would you merge? Would you consider "delete and redirect" instead? - ]]] 05:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - nn. Google brings up a ton-and-a-half of ''nothing''. --] 07:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - nn. Google brings up a ton-and-a-half of ''nothing''. --] 07:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Podcruft. ] 07:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Podcruft. ] 07:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Delete per above --] 11:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Delete per above --] 11:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', crufty neologism. ]<small> ] ]</small> 13:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', crufty neologism. ]<small> ] ]</small> 13:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' lol geocities ] | *'''Delete''' lol geocities ] <small>User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' advertising ] 19:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' advertising ] 19:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC) <small>User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' what Tapir said. ] 20:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', per nom. ] 22:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. -Casting neologisms (and those who create them) will burn in silicon hell. ] 22:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' yet another ''foo''cast. ] <sup>]]</sup>/<sub>]]</sub> ] '']'' 22:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * Grr... Timecop, ''please'' improve the quality of your nominations a little by providing us with some evidence that you've done your homework. If you provide the links that show that things are not notable, people will take them more seriously and you are more likely to get um, ''uninvolved'' people to agree with you. It also wouldn't hurt to space them out a bit more? Fairly low , nothing on . Delete unless evidence of notability provided. - ]]] 01:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) <small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small> | |||
| * '''Delete''' per all the above deletion reasons. ] 10:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per above <small>] <sup>] | ] | ]</sup></small> 08:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - per nom. -- ] 17:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 30 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Javacast
non-notable concept with a single homepage hosted at Geocities. Timecop 07:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Podcast; this doesn't deserve an article in its own right. -- (aeropagitica) 07:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Which bits would you merge? Would you consider "delete and redirect" instead? - brenneman 05:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - nn. Google brings up a ton-and-a-half of nothing. --Hosterweis 07:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Podcruft. Incognito 07:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Delete per above --Depakote 11:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, crufty neologism. Proto t c 13:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete lol geocities Tapir User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
- Delete advertising Jmax- 19:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC) User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
- Delete what Tapir said. Eusebeus 20:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. Ajwebb 22:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -Casting neologisms (and those who create them) will burn in silicon hell. Dan 22:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete yet another foocast. Just zis Guy, you know? /
AfD? 22:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Grr... Timecop, please improve the quality of your nominations a little by providing us with some evidence that you've done your homework. If you provide the links that show that things are not notable, people will take them more seriously and you are more likely to get um, uninvolved people to agree with you. It also wouldn't hurt to space them out a bit more? Fairly low Google, nothing on News. Delete unless evidence of notability provided. - brenneman 01:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Forallah 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page
- Delete per all the above deletion reasons. Cptchipjew 10:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above WhiteNight 08:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. -- Femmina 17:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.