| Revision as of 19:59, 5 January 2006 editEusebeus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,666 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:00, 29 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete'''. ]] 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| non-notable directory site. no need to include every index/directory site in wikipedia, especially non-notable cruft like this ] 07:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | non-notable directory site. no need to include every index/directory site in wikipedia, especially non-notable cruft like this ] 07:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nominator. ] 07:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nominator. ] 07:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' - advertising - ] 07:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' - advertising - ] 07:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Non-notable, advertising. -- ] |
*'''Delete''' Non-notable, advertising. -- ] 07:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Per above --] 11:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Per above --] 11:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy delete''' as obvious consensus reached. Otherwise, '''delete'''. ]<small> ] ]</small> 14:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy delete''' as obvious consensus reached. Otherwise, '''delete'''. ]<small> ] ]</small> 14:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Comment''' I think this could go either way. Podcast Alley isn't exactly unknown in the podcast world. I find their claim that IP/vote matching is infalliable is, well, hilarious. ''']''' <sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 14:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | * '''Comment''' I think this could go either way. Podcast Alley isn't exactly unknown in the podcast world. I find their claim that IP/vote matching is infalliable is, well, hilarious. ''']''' <sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 14:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **Upon further investigation I have found that this site is the #3 Google search result for "Podcast", making it hardly non-notable. Then again, it is a directory site, of which there are many for podcasts. I think the best solution would be to '''merge''' this and others into ]. --''']''' <sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 19:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | **Upon further investigation I have found that this site is the #3 Google search result for "Podcast", making it hardly non-notable. Then again, it is a directory site, of which there are many for podcasts. I think the best solution would be to '''merge''' this and others into ]. --''']''' <sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 19:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' worthless ] | *'''Delete''' worthless ] <small>User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting "delete" votes</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' Advertising. ] 19:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Advertising. ] 19:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)] User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' nn ] 19:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' nn ] 19:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' as nn podcruft. Quite incorrect Cyde, don't you see how well IP's interact with WP? hahaha. ; ) ] 22:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''', nearly meets the strict ] with a rank of 10,641 on Alexa , and has 610,000 google hits. --] 01:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)] <small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small> | |||
| *'''Keep'''. Ah, the GNAA goes for the bandwagon effect. This is a notable podcasting site, with a decent Alexa. Perhaps the GNAA members ought to take up a hobby, like knitting or something useful. --] | ] 05:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Except one problem. If "Poscast Alley" is notable, where's entries for "Postcast.net", iPodder.org (got deleted/redirected, haha), "podcast bunker" and thousands of other shit sites which do nothing but reindex the same content over and over providing absolutely NOTHING NEW OR INTERESTING. Misplaced Pages is NOT an index of every damn website in the world. If someone wants podcasts, they can type "PODCAST" in google and find a pile of shit sites dealing with this stuff. The article is trash too, since when is tracking votes by "IP address" has been innovative, or even effective? Proxies anyone? I bet if the GNAA you really love actually decides that the GNFOS podcast is worth being #1 on that site, how long do you think would it take before thousands of "omg, unique IP address" votes will start to come in? Nice try though. --] 09:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep'''. Major site in the podcasting community. ] 22:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete/Merge''' as per cyde weys <small>] <sup>] | ] | ]</sup></small> 08:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 29 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Podcast Alley
non-notable directory site. no need to include every index/directory site in wikipedia, especially non-notable cruft like this Timecop 07:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. Incognito 07:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Hosterweis 07:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - advertising - Femmina 07:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable, advertising. -- (aeropagitica) 07:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Per above --Depakote 11:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as obvious consensus reached. Otherwise, delete. Proto t c 14:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I think this could go either way. Podcast Alley isn't exactly unknown in the podcast world. I find their claim that IP/vote matching is infalliable is, well, hilarious. Cyde Weys vote 14:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Upon further investigation I have found that this site is the #3 Google search result for "Podcast", making it hardly non-notable. Then again, it is a directory site, of which there are many for podcasts. I think the best solution would be to merge this and others into List of podcast directories. --Cyde Weys vote 19:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete worthless Tapir User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting "delete" votes
- Delete Advertising. Jmax- 19:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Jmax User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
- Delete nn Eusebeus 19:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as nn podcruft. Quite incorrect Cyde, don't you see how well IP's interact with WP? hahaha. ; ) Dan 22:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, nearly meets the strict WP:WEB with a rank of 10,641 on Alexa , and has 610,000 google hits. --Interiot 01:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Forallah 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Forallah User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page
- Keep. Ah, the GNAA goes for the bandwagon effect. This is a notable podcasting site, with a decent Alexa. Perhaps the GNAA members ought to take up a hobby, like knitting or something useful. --Calton | Talk 05:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Except one problem. If "Poscast Alley" is notable, where's entries for "Postcast.net", iPodder.org (got deleted/redirected, haha), "podcast bunker" and thousands of other shit sites which do nothing but reindex the same content over and over providing absolutely NOTHING NEW OR INTERESTING. Misplaced Pages is NOT an index of every damn website in the world. If someone wants podcasts, they can type "PODCAST" in google and find a pile of shit sites dealing with this stuff. The article is trash too, since when is tracking votes by "IP address" has been innovative, or even effective? Proxies anyone? I bet if the GNAA you really love actually decides that the GNFOS podcast is worth being #1 on that site, how long do you think would it take before thousands of "omg, unique IP address" votes will start to come in? Nice try though. --Timecop 09:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Major site in the podcasting community. Haakon 22:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete/Merge as per cyde weys WhiteNight 08:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.