Revision as of 02:56, 6 January 2006 editJarlaxleArtemis (talk | contribs)10,978 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 11:45, 12 June 2017 edit undoPrimefac (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators208,903 edits replace deprecated template |
(50 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
'''Brian Chase''' (born circa ]) is a ] citizen who posted false information on '']'', which led to the ]. |
|
|
<ref name=NYTSeigenthaler>Seelye, Katharine Q (], ]). . '']''. |
|
|
</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{rcat shell|{{r to related topic}}}} |
|
Chase was the ] of Rush Delivery in ] when he anonymously posted to ''Misplaced Pages'' from his employer's ] on ], ]. His post stated that ], a former editor of '']'' in Nashville, was believed to have been involved in the assassinations of both ] and ] and had lived in the ] for several years. The article remained unedited for several months until Seigenthaler was made aware of the article and subsequently criticized ''Misplaced Pages'' in several media outlets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chase learned of the effect of his post through the news. Meanwhile, the IP address he had used was traced back to his company by ], a commentator regarding privacy issues and the World Wide Web and a critic of ''Misplaced Pages''. Chase resigned from Rush Delivery on ] and delivered a handwritten apology that day to Seigenthaler. Chase said he had done it as a joke to shock a colleague, after he had found out anyone could edit ''Misplaced Pages''; he thought that it was a "gag" web site. <ref name=NYTSeigenthaler/> Seigenthaler encouraged Chase's boss to not accept his resignation. |
|
|
|
|
|
In an interview with Daniel Terdiman of CNET News, |
|
|
<ref>Terdiman, Daniel (] ]). ''ZDNet News''. Retrieved ] ]. |
|
|
</ref> |
|
|
Daniel Brandt set forth his views regarding privacy concerns arising from Brian Chase's role as a fifteen-minute newsmaker: |
|
|
|
|
|
'' " . . . Misplaced Pages's criteria for whether someone merits a biography has an extremely low standard. For example, there's a page on Brian Chase. . . . Right now, newspapers should print his name because it's topical. But a few months from now, his name will sort of disappear from the Internet because newspapers don't rate that high on the search engines, and it's only up in Google news for a month. But Misplaced Pages articles rank very, very highly on all search engines and Brian Chase will shoot right up to the top with the Misplaced Pages. '' |
|
|
|
|
|
'' "And when this poor guy is trying to send out his resume, and he never gets called back from interviews, how do you know that the people aren't Googling him when they get his resume and saying, 'Well, he did this thing.' The permanence becomes invasion of privacy even more so than getting your name in the newspaper." '' |
|
|
|
|
|
== Notes == |
|
|
<references/> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Sources== |
|
|
* Page, Susan (] ]). , ''USA Today''. Retrieved ] ]. |
|
|
* Mielczarek, Natalia (] ]). ''The Tennessean''. |
|
|
* Brandt, Daniel (] ]). via wikipedia-watch.org. Retrieved ] ]. |
|
|
* Terdiman, Daniel (] ]). ''C|Net News.com''. Retrieved ] ]. |
|
|
* ], (] ]) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|