Revision as of 03:19, 2 February 2010 editGregJackP (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,867 edits →Requests for assessment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:37, 29 December 2024 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,914 edits →Requests for assessment: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{WPMILHIST Navigation}} |
<noinclude>{{WPMILHIST Navigation}} | ||
]</noinclude> | |||
⚫ | == Requests for assessment == | ||
<span id="REQ">{{Shortcut|WP:MHA#REQ|WP:MHAR}}</span> | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | === Requests for assessment === | ||
{{notice|Please note that this section is now a separate, transcluded sub-page, which you might like to watchlist separately. Thanks!}} | |||
<includeonly>{{Shortcut|WP:MHA#REQ}}</includeonly><noinclude>{{Shortcut|WP:MHAR}}</noinclude><includeonly> | |||
:''Please note that this section is transcluded from a separate requests page, which you may wish to ''''''.''</includeonly> | |||
If you have made significant |
Editors can self-assess articles against the ]<sup>]</sup> up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made ]. Please consider entering articles you have improved in the ]. | ||
<!-- | |||
Experienced assessors are encouraged to take a look at ] and check a few of ≈ B-Class assessments. Feel free to downgrade them if you consider they don't meet one or more the criteria. Please also delete any that you have checked. See also ], whose articles often overlap with military history topics. | |||
## LIST NEW ARTICLES AT THE BOTTOM ## | |||
----- | |||
'''ADD NEW REQUESTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION AND BEFORE THE LINE FOR THE BACKLOG CHECK REQUEST'''<br> | |||
Please remember to sign your requests. | |||
*<s>]:</s> a new article for a formation of the RNZAF during WWII, please assess. Thanks, ] (]) 03:31, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
--> | |||
*] Is currently ranked B-class, but does fails B1 and B2, and B3 and B4 are very weak. I intend to work on it later, but so far it does not seem B-class to me. ] (]) 00:36, 13 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>]</s> expanded article, please assess for B-class.--] (]) 06:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |||
*<s>]</s>. New article. please assess against B class. ] (]) 16:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**Start, lacks information about family life, if any, to be complete. | |||
::*Isn't any. Isn't even a picture. It was previously assessed as B by Ian and Mr. Bee. So you've downgraded it? ] (]) 23:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::*I did because there wasn't any thing that said the information was not known or available. I'll change it back if you'll add a statement to that effect to the article. Can't hold you responsible if it's not available.--] (]) 01:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::added on talk page. Same is true for Bulgenbach, which I added there as well. | |||
*] please assess for B-class.--] (]) 05:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>]</s> pls. ] (]) 00:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**B class ] (]) 06:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*] Last of the Gangut class.--] (]) 04:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>]</s>: I have spent a bit of time adding references to this article over the past week or so. I think its ready for a B class review. Cheers. — ] (]) 11:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**B class ] (]) 19:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC) The article is getting better. Lot of good work there. I'm not too worried about the missing page number. I don't have the book unfortunately, or I'd add it. (I'm not certain that I agree with it either though.) I'm going to go over all the references again, to make sure that they do back up what is being said. The article would best be sent to Peer Review before attempting to upgrade it to an A. ] (]) 19:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**Cheers, that would be appreciated. I don't have a number of the sources used in the article, so I wasn't able to check that the references matched. In this regard I will wait to see how you go before taking the article further. — ] (]) 01:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>]</s> No abundance of sources on this fellow. ] (]) 21:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**Start--] (]) 19:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::* not much else on him that I could find and verify. Will keep looking. ] (]) 23:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*] please. ] (]) 21:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>]</s> A World War One destroyer action, if someone could assess for B id be grateful.] (]) 00:46, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**B class. It was going to fail on B4, so I fixed the spelling and grammatical errors. ] (]) 01:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>]</s> Please assess for B-class. ] (]) 14:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
**B-class, nice job.--] (]) 19:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
* ] Please assess for B-Class ] (]) 20:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>]</s> Please assess for B-Class (] (]) 03:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)) | |||
''Add new requests above this line'' <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE, CHANGE OR EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list it for ] instead. | |||
⚫ | :B class. Thanks. ] (]) 06:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
==Backlogs== | |||
<span id="BACKLOGS">{{Shortcut|WP:MHA#BACKLOGS|WP:MHAB}}</span> | |||
Please help to clear any backlogs of unassessed articles in the following categories: | |||
⚫ | ''Please also check the ] for articles needing assessment.'' | ||
* The current status of ''']''' = {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Unassessed military history articles}} articles unassessed. After they have been assessed by class, they are automatically removed from this category. | |||
* The current status of ''']''' = {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Military history articles with no associated task force}} articles without task forces. After task forces have been assigned, articles are automatically removed from the category. | |||
* The current status of ''']''' = {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Military history articles with incomplete B-Class checklists}} articles with incomplete checklists. After the checklists have been completed, articles are automatically removed from the category. |
Latest revision as of 06:37, 29 December 2024
Requests for assessment
ShortcutEditors can self-assess articles against the five B-class criteria up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department. Please consider entering articles you have improved in the military history article writing contest.
Experienced assessors are encouraged to take a look at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#AutoCheck report for November and check a few of ≈ B-Class assessments. Feel free to downgrade them if you consider they don't meet one or more the criteria. Please also delete any that you have checked. See also Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Spaceflight/Assessment, whose articles often overlap with military history topics.
ADD NEW REQUESTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION AND BEFORE THE LINE FOR THE BACKLOG CHECK REQUEST
Please remember to sign your requests.
No. 1 (Islands) Group RNZAF:a new article for a formation of the RNZAF during WWII, please assess. Thanks, Zawed (talk) 03:31, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- B class. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 06:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Please also check the military history assessment backlog for articles needing assessment.
Category: