Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jstanierm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:52, 4 February 2010 editCTF83! (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,457 edits Blocked: edit-warring at Same-sex marriage← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:54, 22 June 2010 edit undoJstanierm (talk | contribs)301 editsm Blanked the page 
(18 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
BUNNIES RULE <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Socialist==
How can you be a socialist and a Christian at the same time? I myself am a socialist, but I believe that one of the best things about socialism is our refusal to accept ill-conceived bullcrap like religion. All the best. ] (]) 17:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

:What is trolling? ] (]) 22:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

=='''''HELP US MAKING THE PROJECT OF ANCIENT GREEK WIKIPEDIA'''''==

We are the promoters of the Misplaced Pages in Ancient Greek. we need your help, specially for write and the , for demonstrating, to the language subcommittee, the value of our project.

Thanks a lot for your help. needs you! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==]==
(This is being cross-posted to everyone listed in ] and ])

Infrogmation and I are organizating a Misplaced Pages meetup in New Orleans on Saturday, August 23. Everyone is invited. ] (]) 18:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

==3RR==
{{uw-3RR|same-sex marriage }} <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 18:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I am not edit warring. There has been deletion of cited material with no discussion on the talk page for what it should not be there. ] (]) 18:24, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

== Blocked: edit-warring at ] ==

<div class="user-block">
] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]{{#if:Same-sex marriage|&#32;at ]}}. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:yes|<font face="Arial"> ]&nbsp;(])</font> 18:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)}}</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block -->

{{unblock|This is stemming from the addition of the following sentence in the lead to the article on ]: "Opponents to same-sex marriage argue that recognizing same-sex marriage as a universal human rights issue will make it more likely that the law will one day recognize other forms of unions that are also currently illegal such as incest or polygamous marriage."

There was discussion on the talk page. Ultimately one person disagreed, but did not discuss any further even when his issue was addressed (however, he did not stop editting the page). One other person at first disagreed, and then later agreed to include the material if more citations were found. Six citations were offered and the material was included. After this, several editors simply reverted without discussing or explaining why they felt the material should not be included. I reverted their vandalism and left comments on their talk page directing them to discuss whatever they felt might be at issue on the talk page. None did. The article, without the addition of this sentence, currently does not meet the NPOV standards. (There is a sentence one paragraph beneath it which states: "Supporters of same-sex marriage often... liken prohibitions on same-sex marriage to past prohibitions on interracial marriage. (This is the same slippery-slope argument above only presented from one side. The article ought to include both or neither.] (]) 18:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)}}
:You can't give just 2 hours and call it a consensus. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 18:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:54, 22 June 2010