| Revision as of 22:51, 9 February 2010 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,583 editsm Dating comment by Artfan21 - ""← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:33, 21 November 2016 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,136,056 edits →ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (86 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| ==Shaun Garea== | |||
| Re:Deletion. Yes Im sorry this was my first page and I dont want to mess it up so please just delete it if it is not right. I did it as I like his work here and see him at shows and just took stuff off his websites, not the most computer savvy ;-( A quick deletion would be best then. I was going to do similar articles on other notable artists in my hometown but after reading more info about 'notability' Ill leave it alone. Thanks | |||
| ] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 22:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Simon-in-sagamihara (usurped). Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| ==Sylvia Ratonel== | |||
| Thanks for your constructive feedback on the abovementioned article.] (]) 12:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ==Shirogane Tunnel== | |||
| See ]. ]<span style="background-color:white; color:grey;">&</span>] 23:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Cricut== | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/11&oldid=750554570 --> | |||
| Please remove the speedy-deletion template from ]. CSD G11 does not apply here; I don't see how this stub about a commercial product could be considered "exclusively promotional". - ] (]) 02:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Uh, why are going to delete an article that I created that makes good sense? Please tell me why. Thanks. | |||
| ] (]) 02:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Incorrect CSD tagging == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I came across ], which you tagged as G1 (patent nonsense). The page's content was "what is lady gaga's age". This is very comprehensible and not patent nonsense. I've deleted the page under G8, which is more appropriate. You may want to look at ] for an explanation of G1, with examples. ] (]) 04:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)<br /> | |||
| Thanks for the heads-up. ] (]) 04:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == CSD-tag ] == | |||
| Actually, this is not vandalism. I'm gonna make it a redirect to ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 06:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <br /> | |||
| Fair enough. It was full of crap before someone whittled it down to that one sentence, which is why I had attached db-vandalism to it. ] (]) 06:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == btw... == | |||
| You need to notify people when you tag their "creations", no matter how ridiculous they are. ] <sup>]</sup> 06:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)<br /> | |||
| Takes too long :P Just kidding. OK, will start doing so from next edit. ] (]) 06:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :That's so we can keep a record of "repeat-offenders," see? :) ] <sup>]</sup> 06:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Alice Pung == | |||
| I have removed your prod tag from this article, because she clearly is notable; winner of an industry award, multiple interviews by reliable sources and notable books. I note that you have several messages above which query your deletion tags; I would suggest reviewing the relevant policy and taking it more slowly in future. ] (]) 06:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Ditto with ]; it isn't nonsense as defined in the speedy deletion guidelines. db-club would have been more appropriate; please make sure you understand the relevant guidelines before tagging articles. ] (]) 06:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :You could make sense of what he wrote? ] (]) 06:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, fairly easily. The article was quite clearly about a group of football fans. ] (]) 07:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Fair enough. ] (]) 07:20, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|SchuminWeb|ts=07:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
| ] (]) 07:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|SchuminWeb|ts=07:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
| ] (]) 07:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy deletion tagging == | |||
| Hi Simon-in-sagamihara, just FYI, when you mark a page for speedy deletion, as you did with ] and ], could you please leave an appropriate ] and notify the page creator about it? If you use a tool like ] it'll do both automatically. Thanks— ]''' (]) 07:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Yep, no problem. Another admin admonished me about that, I think those two articles you mentioned are from before that. I haven't used any of the tools before but I'll give that one your mentioned a try tonight. Thanks for the heads-up. ] (]) 07:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I appreciate it. For one thing, I think you'll find that notifying authors will actually reduce how often they remove speedy tags; if a strange tag shows up with no explanation people are more inclined to just delete it. Twinkle is easy to use, doesn't require downloading anything, and does a good job 95% of the time (sometimes it craps out halfway through applying a tag). Happy hunting— ]''' (]) 07:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :<b>non-notable and totally unreferenced BLP</b> | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 13:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Take care when warning people of speedy deletion messages. I did not create the ] article. ] (]) 18:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Not a hoax, but a fictional character. ] (]) 02:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Another incorrect usage of CSD G1 == | |||
| Hello there. Please keep in mind (as a previous editor has pointed out above) that ] is to be used for patent nonsense only. That means pages which are literally gibberish (like "woirehfaoewihfaoiweuaiwehf" for example). You recently tagged ] as G1. It was an article written in Spanish about a non-notable band. For those of us who understand Spanish, tagging it as A7 (as a band with no claim of notability) would be appropriate, however G1 says specifically in the section that it does not apply to articles solely because they are written in a foreign language. Unless someone who understands the language makes the determination that it qualifies under another CSD section, pages you come across in another language should be brought to ]. Thanks, --]—<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)<br /> | |||
| Gotcha. ] (]) 03:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == And yet another incorrect usage of CSD A-7? == | |||
| Here's your frickun . Good night and au revoir. ] (]) 06:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :FYI, now ]. ]''' (]) 08:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == More CSD == | |||
| Although I don't want to jump on the seeming CSD bandwagon, I felt like giving you a friendly reminder: When you see cases like , it's generally best to wait for a bit and see if the user intends to request deletion, as they did on ]. I would also suggest that you don't use Twinkle for re-adding CSD tags (or at least turn off the notification option), as receiving several deletion notices for the same iteration of an article can come across as a bit ]. Happy editing. '''''—<font color="black">]</font>'''<font color="blue">]</font>'' 06:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Gotcha. As for that edit you mentioned, the author hadn't blanked it when I re-added the CSD (or else yeah, I would have just put the author-requested tag on there.) I'll make sure to turn off notification on Twinkle. Thanks for your input. ] (]) 06:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Prod procedure == | |||
| It is acceptable to remove a PROD tag. See ]. If a PROD tag is removed, the procedure is not to readd the tag, but to take it to AFD, which I have done. ] (]) 07:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : The bot reverted the removal, not me. I know it's OK to remove PROD tags. ] (]) 07:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: I must have . My apologies. ] (]) 09:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Yeah, no problem. I don't really get it myself. It's not my bot or anything - why would the bot change be attributed to me? The plot thickens. *puts on tinfoil hat* ] (]) 09:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| What makes you think that the ] article is a hoax? A moment's Googling shows that this is a real crime. -- ] (]) 09:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The article is clearly ''not'' a dictionary definition. Truck hijacking is a well-known class of theft-with-violence, with a variety of well-known techniques, some of which are mentioned here. -- ] (]) 09:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Are you for real? This is just a subset of carjacking. ] (]) 09:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, I am for real, and no, it's not. In the case of carjacking, the aim is to steal the car itself (as the name suggests). In the case of lorry hijacking, it's to steal the load. Carjacking is often an opportunistic crime carried out by individuals; truck hijacking is generally carried out by criminal gangs, who need to be able to handle a full truckload of stuff and then fence it. -- ] (]) 09:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::By the way, regarding your two attempts to remove it: "hoax" and "dicdef" are surely mutually exclusive? ] is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. -- ] (]) 09:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: All right already, quit your sperging. One can change one's mind, you know. ] (]) 09:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == More CSD == | |||
| Hi. I declined your A7 tagging of ] because A7 applies to "an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble", which this was about a song. A PROD of AfD nomination might be more appropriate. | |||
| Since you've been getting a lot of CSD tags declined, I'd recommend perhaps taking things a bit more slowly while you fully familiarise yourself with the details of the criteria. I'm not saying this to be critical, but to help you avoid future disputed tags and wasted time, since you also seem to be doing perfectly good CSD taggings too. If you're at all interested I'd be happy to go through some CSD criteria with you and give you a hand with getting the tags right the first time in future. Cheers, ] (]) 17:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:33, 21 November 2016
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Simon-in-sagamihara (usurped). Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)