Revision as of 12:35, 8 January 2006 view sourceSashatoBot (talk | contribs)44,607 editsm robot Adding: sr← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:14, 29 December 2024 view source AimanAbir18plus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,314 edits ceTag: Visual edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Ideological and philosophical beliefs based on Satan}} | |||
{{unsourced}} | |||
{{pp-move|small=yes}} | |||
{{pp|small=yes}} | |||
{{Redirect-distinguish-for|Satanist|Sethianism|other uses|Satanism (disambiguation)|and|Satanist (disambiguation)}} | |||
{{Use American English|date=February 2020}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2024}} | |||
] is a widespread symbol of Satanism.{{Sfn|Petersen|2004|pp=444–446}}]] | |||
] (1847) by ]]] | |||
'''Satanism''' refers to a group of ], ], and/or ] beliefs based on ]—particularly his worship or veneration.<ref name="Britannica-White"/> Satan is associated with the ], a fallen angel regarded as chief of the ]s who tempt humans into sin.<ref name="Britannica-White">{{cite web |last1=White |first1=Ethan Doyle |title=History & Society. Satanism, occult practice |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Satanism |website=Britannica |date=14 December 2023 |access-date=1 January 2024}}</ref>{{#tag:ref|Satan in Judaism and Islam. | |||
* While most Jews do not believe in the existence of a supernatural omnimalevolent figure,{{sfn|Glustrom|1989|pages=22–24}} it is "sometimes understood" in Judaism (according to the Britannica), that Satan is a figure whose role as adversary is not "antithetical" to God but acting as a sort of "divine prosecutor" for the Supreme Being, as in the case of Job.<ref name="Britannica-White"/> | |||
*In Islam ''shayāṭīn'' (with consonantal roots similar to Satan) is the collective term for devils, while it is '']'' who is the leader of the devils. Like Satan in Christianity '']'' was cast down from heaven for his pride and disobedience, unlike Satan, (at least in some versions) ''Iblis'' is a '']'' not an ].<ref name="Awn1983-1">{{cite book |author-last=Awn |author-first=Peter J. |year=1983 |chapter=Mythic Biography |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jt-mDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA18 |title=Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblīs in Sufi Psychology |location=] and ] |publisher=] |series=Numen Book Series |volume=44 |pages=18–56 |doi=10.1163/9789004378636_003 |isbn=978-90-04-37863-6 }}</ref><ref name=Mahmoud1995>{{cite journal |last1=Mahmoud |first1=Muhammad |title=The Creation Story in 'Sūrat al-Baqara', with Special Reference to al-Ṭabarī's Material: An Analysis |journal=Journal of Arabic Literature |date=1995 |volume=26 |issue=1/2 |pages=201–214 |doi=10.1163/157006495X00175 |jstor=4183374 |issn=0085-2376 }}</ref> |group=Note}} The phenomenon of Satanism shares "historical connections and family resemblances" with the ] milieu of other ] figures such as ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="Britannica-White"/> Self-identified Satanism is a relatively modern phenomenon, largely attributed to the 1966 founding of the ] by ] in the United States—an atheistic group that does not believe in a supernatural Satan.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1>]: section 1. What Is Satan?</ref> | |||
Accusations of groups engaged in "]" have echoed throughout much of Christian history. During the ], the ] led by the ] alleged that various ] sects and groups, such as the ] and the ], performed secret Satanic rituals. In the subsequent ], belief in a widespread Satanic conspiracy of witches resulted in ] across Europe and the North American colonies, peaking between 1560 and 1630 CE.<ref name="Thurston 2001 Page 79">]. p. 79.</ref><ref name="Levack-2006">{{Cite book |last=Levack |first=Brian P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C8yqDKcSgSUC |title=The Witch-hunt in Early Modern Europe |date=2006 |publisher=Pearson Longman |isbn=978-0-582-41901-8 |language=en |chapter=Chapter 7}}</ref> The terms ''Satanist'' and ''Satanism'' emerged during the ] and ] (1517–1700 CE),{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1p=257 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=2}} as both Catholics and Protestants accused each other of intentionally being in league with Satan.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=35}} | |||
{{Template:Satanism}} | |||
'''Satanism''' is a religious, semi-religious and/or ] movement whose adherents recognize ] as an ], pre-cosmic force, actual living entity, or some aspect of ]. Although named for ], a name associated with ] and ], Satanism is more commonly the name given to certain ] paths which emphasize the ], as opposed to the much more common ]. Left-Handers believe in spiritual enrichment through their own work on themselves, and that ultimately they are answerable only to themselves, while Right-Handers believe in spiritual enrichment through the dissolution or submission of the self to (or into) something greater. ]ans do not in fact worship a deity called Satan, or necessarily any other deity, nor do they follow a principle of ]. This aspect of their beliefs is very commonly misunderstood due to the presence of theistic Satanists, who revere Satan as a literal being. | |||
Since the 19th century various small religious groups have emerged that identify as Satanist or use Satanic iconography. While the groups that appeared after the 1960s differed greatly, they can be broadly divided into ] and ].<ref name="Satanism-Introduction">{{cite web |author-last=Abrams |author-first=Joe |editor-last=Wyman |editor-first=Kelly |date=Spring 2006 |title=The Religious Movements Homepage Project – Satanism: An Introduction |url=http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/satanism/intro.html#atheistic/theistic |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060829152745/http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/satanism/intro.html#atheistic/theistic |archive-date=29 August 2006 |website=virginia.edu |publisher=] |access-date=1 January 2021}}</ref> Those venerating Satan as a supernatural ] are unlikely to ascribe ], instead relating to Satan as a ]. Atheistic Satanists regard Satan as a symbol of certain human traits, a useful metaphor without ontological reality.<ref name="Point of Inquiry Interview">{{cite web|last=Gilmore|first=Peter|title=Science and Satanism|work=Point of Inquiry Interview |date=10 August 2007 |url=http://www.pointofinquiry.org/peter_h_gilmore_science_and_satanism/|access-date=9 December 2013}}</ref> Contemporary religious Satanism is predominantly an American phenomenon, although the rise of globalization and the Internet have seen these ideas spread to other parts of the world.{{sfn|Petersen|2009a}} | |||
Instead of divine laws or naturistic principles (such as in ]), Satanism generally focuses upon material or physical advancement of the ] with guidance from external higher beings or external principles, instead of submission to a ] or a set of ]s. For this reason, many contemporary Satanists eschew traditional religious beliefs, attitudes and ] in favor of more ], self-centering ]s, ], ] and practices such as ], ] and ]. However, some Satanists do choose voluntary moral codes, thought carries a strong current of inversionism; although a faith in its own right groups or individuals described in some sense or another as Satanic can largely, though incomprehensively, be described as belonging to one of two unofficial sub-groupings: ''']''' or ''']'''. | |||
==History== | |||
==Devil in society== | |||
The concept of Satan has evolved over the centuries, as has Satanism. | |||
] | |||
Originally in ] traditions, Satan was seen as a part of creation, embodying the principle that one could choose contrary to ]'s wishes, and thus empowering the potential for ] and ]. (In this context an ancient ] commentary notes that only when the potential to ] God's will arose, could creation become "very good" as opposed to merely "good"). Over the centuries this concept of Satan came to embody all that was ] and against God, a change attributable to two main influences: | |||
Historical and anthropological research suggests that nearly all societies have developed the idea of a sinister and anti-human force that can hide itself within society.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=13–14}} This commonly involves a belief in ], a group of individuals who invert the norms of their society and seek to harm their community, for instance by engaging in ], murder, and ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=14}} Allegations of witchcraft may have different causes and serve different functions within a society.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=16}} For instance, they may serve to uphold social norms,{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=15}} to heighten the tension in existing conflicts between individuals,{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=15}} or to scapegoat certain individuals for various social problems.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=16}} | |||
* The view that everything had its opposite, and that God, all-good, must have His opposing deity too (many preceding multiple deity religions also had their evil gods as well as good gods, ] of the ]ians being one example), | |||
* The spreading of ], followed by ], both religions which gained a wide number of adherents, which placed a high premium on ] and the ], and within which Satan grew as an embodiment of all that was trying to undermine God in this ] world-view. | |||
] | |||
As society evolved from the ] into the ] onwards (] and ] ]), people in Western societies began to question the nature of evil, and Satan gradually evolved yet again in response to this, so Satanism came to signify a tradition which denied traditional religious paths in favor of a self-oriented path, rather than a path which favored evil. | |||
Another contributing factor to the idea of Satanism is the concept that there is an agent of misfortune and evil who operates on a cosmic scale,{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=19}} something usually associated with a strong form of ethical dualism that divides the world clearly into forces of good and forces of evil.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=20}} The earliest such entity known is ], a figure that appears in the Persian religion of ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=19}}{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=18}} This concept was also embraced by Judaism and early Christianity, and although it was soon marginalized within Jewish thought, it gained increasing importance within early Christian understandings of the cosmos.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=21}} | |||
In an older sense, ''Satanism'' also refers to unorthodox practices within ]s deemed by an ] to be in opposition to the ]ic ]. The earliest recorded instance of the word is in "A confutation of a booke (by Bp. Jewel) entitled An apologie of the ]", by ] (]): | |||
''ll, ii, 42 b, "Meaning the time when Luther first bringed to Germanie the poisoned cuppe of his heresies, blasphemies, and Satanismes."'' | |||
As ] himself would have denied any link between his teachings and Satan, this use of the term ''Satanism'' was primarily ]. Many Satanists find such use of the term offensive. | |||
The ] terrible god ] is traditionally honored with the syncretic dance and parade '']'' ('Dance of the Devils') that was opposed to the Catholic Church in origin.<ref>{{cite book |author=Gruszczyńska-Ziółkowska, Anna |title=El poder del sonido: el papel de las crónicas españolas en la etnomusicología andina |place=Ecuador |year=1995 |publisher=Ediciones Abya-Yala |language=es |isbn=9978-04-147-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rmq4bGIh9jgC |page=107}}</ref> | |||
== Satan within Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Ayyavazhi== | |||
The term "Satan" originated with ] and was expanded upon by ] and ]. This ]-] view of Satan can be broken up as follows: | |||
== Etymology and definitions == | |||
*]: Satan (שטן) in ], means "adversary" or "accuser", and is also the name used for the angel who tests believers. Satan is not considered an enemy of God, but a servant whose duties include testing the faith of humanity. | |||
===Etymology=== | |||
*]: The ] word for Satan, "al-Shaitaan" (الشيطان) means transgressor, or adversary, as in ]. It is a title which is generally attributed to a being called ], who is a ] that disobeyed God and was condemned consequently by God to serve as a source of misguidance for mankind and the Jinn to test their faith in God. Iblis is said to be the proper name for the ]-like figure named in the ] whereas there are many ]. | |||
], ''Satan Arousing the Rebel Angels'', 1808]] | |||
*]: In most branches of Christianity, Satan, originally ] before he fell away from Grace, is a spiritual being or ] who was once in God's service. Satan is said to have fallen from God due to excess of pride and self-idolatry. (In Christianity, the fallen "son of the dawn" of Isaiah 14:12 is identified with the "adversary" of the Book of Job.) It is said to be Satan who whispered to man that he could become as God, negating his creaturely position, which led to man's ] and his being cast out of Eden. Satan is also referred to as the ] from the Greek "diavolos" (Διαβολος), meaning "slanderer" or "one who accuses falsely" (derived from a verb which most literally means "to throw across" or "carry something over"). Reportedly, ] made the claim that the word "devil" was derived from the Sanskrit "devi", meaning ] (though this is thought to be an incorrect ]). | |||
The term ''Satan'' has evolved from a ] term for "adversary" or "to oppose", into the Christian figure of a fallen angel who tempts mortals into sin. The word ''Satan'' was not originally a proper name, but rather an ordinary noun that means "adversary". In this context, it appears at several points in the ].{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1p=51 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=19}} For instance, in the ], ] is presented as the satan ("adversary") of the ], while in the ], the term appears as a verb, when Jehovah sent an angel to satan ("to oppose") ].{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=51}} | |||
Prior to the composition of the ], the idea developed within Jewish communities that Satan was the name of an angel who had rebelled against Jehovah and had been cast out of Heaven along with his followers; this account would be incorporated into contemporary texts such as the ].{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=52}} This Satan was then featured in parts of the New Testament, where he was presented as a figure who tempts humans to commit ]; in the ] and the ], he attempted to tempt ] as the latter fasted in the wilderness.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=53}} | |||
*]: ] the source of ] and religious book of Ayyavazhi says about ], a satan like figure. He was sliced into six fragments and in each successive ]s these fragments took birth in the world as ], ] etc. | |||
While the early Christian idea of the Devil was not well developed, it gradually adapted and expanded through the creation of folklore, art, theological treatises, and morality tales, thus providing the character with a range of extra-Biblical associations.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=21–22}} Beginning in the early middle ages, the concept developed in Christianity of the devil as "archrepresentative of evil", and of the Satanist "as malign mirror image of the good Christian".<ref> Chapter 1, The Christian Invention of Satanism, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), abstract</ref> | |||
==Types and approaches within Satanism== | |||
The word ''Satanism'' was adopted into English from the French ''satanisme''.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=9}} The terms ''Satanism'' and ''Satanist'' are first recorded as appearing in the English and French languages during the 16th century, when they were used by Christian groups to attack other, rival Christian groups.{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1p=257 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=2}} In a ] tract of 1565, the author condemns the "heresies, blasphemies, and sathanismes " of the ].{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=9}} In an ] work of 1559, ] and other Protestant sects are condemned as "swarmes of Satanistes ".{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=9}} As used in this manner, the term ''Satanism'' was not used to claim that people literally worshipped Satan, but instead that they deviated from true Christianity, and thus were serving the will of Satan.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=2}} During the 19th century, the term ''Satanism'' began to be used to describe those considered to lead a broadly immoral lifestyle,{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=2}} and it was only in the late 19th century that it came to be applied in English to individuals who were believed to consciously and deliberately venerate Satan.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=2}} This latter meaning had appeared earlier in the ]; the ] Bishop ] had described devil-worshipping sorcerers as ''Sathanister'' in his ''Ethica Christiana'', produced between 1615 and 1630.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=44}} | |||
===Philosophical Satanism=== | |||
===Accused v. identified=== | |||
Largely considered to have been unofficially founded by ], with his creation of the ] (the first above-ground organization to use the term), Philosophical Satanism views one's self as the ] center of the universe, and the highest aspirations and virtues are those which seek the elevation and improvement of the individual Satanist over others. Philosophical Satanists generally do not recognize a theological deity or a metaphysical afterlife (though this is not to say that one ''must'' not); however this does not equate to a life devoid of spirituality. | |||
Some definitions of Satanism offered/suggested by scholars include: | |||
* the worship or veneration of the figure from Christian belief known as Satan, the Devil or Lucifer (Ethan Doyle White);<ref name="Britannica-White"/> | |||
* the "intentional, religiously motivated veneration of Satan" (Religion scholar Ruben van Luijk);<ref>R. van Luijk, Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 5.</ref>{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=2}} | |||
* "a system in which Satan is celebrated in a prominent position" (Satanism scholar Per Faxneld).<ref>P. Faxneld, Satanic Feminism: Lucifer As the Liberator of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 25.</ref> (This definition has the advantage of avoiding "assumptions about the nature of religion").<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1-Invention/> | |||
*the simultaneous presence of three characteristics: | |||
::1) the worship of the character in the Bible whose name is Satan or Lucifer, | |||
::2) the organization of these "Satanists" into a group with at least some kind of organization and hierarchy, and ... | |||
::3) and has some kind of ritual or liturgical practices | |||
:whether the group with these characteristics perceives Satan as personal or impersonal, real or symbolic, does not matter. (Italian sociologist ] writing in 1994).{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=3}} | |||
But these definitions of Satanism are limited to | |||
To the Philosophical Satanist, a person is his own god. He disdains rationalist, secular humanistic beliefs, seeing them as abhoring the existence of the supernatural, only to thereby promote a sterile life grounded in the 'real world' alone and sees them as working towards the altruistic advancement of his fellow man while neglecting due attendance to one's own gratification and fulfillment. Obviously, philosophically Satanic thought has had a long history before LaVey's ]. Though it was the notion of Satan as the conceited, self-seeking ], acting falsely to his true position which inspired the title in spite of Judeo-Christian theology, which views Satan as evil because of these qualities. | |||
* figures and groups who ''identify'' as Satanists or at least admirers of Satan (Romantic Satanists, hellfire clubs and modern Satanists). | |||
... excluding | |||
* figures and groups ''accused'' of worshipping Satan and in the process committing horrible crimes (in the middle ages, during the 1980–1994 ], etc.) but who either appear to have not been satanists or to not have actually existed. | |||
And by excluding the second group, you leave out most of the history of Satanism, (Joseph P. Laycock argues).<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1-Invention>]: section 1. What Is Satanism? Anton LaVey and the Invention of Satanism</ref> | |||
If you ''do'' include both groups, you have two sides with very different views on who or what Satan was/is and represented. The accusers usually follow the Christian idea of Satan as an irredeemably evil fallen angel who seeks the destruction of both God and humanity, but who (along with his followers) is doomed to fail and to suffer eternal punishment.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1/> While the self-identified Satanists often do not believe that Satan actually exists as a being (they believe he is a symbol and a "] figure",<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-Amoral-O9A/> "an esoteric symbol of a vital force that permeates the universe"),<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.3-Esotericism>]: section 3 Satanic Sympathizers. Satan and Esotericism</ref> let alone is trying to destroy humanity. | |||
====LaVeyan Satanism==== | |||
A definitions/descriptions that would include the "satanism" of heresy crusades and moral panics is: | |||
''Main article: ]'' | |||
* an invention of Christianity, relying on a character deriving from ], i.e. Satan, (another description of Satanism by Ruben van Luijk).{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=16}} | |||
In their study of Satanism, the ] scholars Asbjørn Dyrendal, ], and Jesper Aa. Petersen stated that the term ''Satanism'' "has a history of being a designation made by people against those whom they dislike; it is a term used for ']'".{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=7}} | |||
This type of Satanism is based on the philosophy of ] as outlined in '']'' and other works. LaVey was the founder of the ] (c.a. 1966). LaVey was influenced by the writings of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and others. "Satan", in the view of LaVey, is seen as a positive influence, while the "divine" actions of the church are to be mocked, and the mundane is held in the highest disregard. | |||
Eugene Gallagher noted that Satanism was usually "a ], not a descriptive term".{{sfn|Gallagher|2006|p=151}} | |||
Similar to the way certain Christian denominations accuse each other of heresy, different satanic groups—mainly the Church of Satan (CoS), the Temple of Set (ToS), the Order of Nine Angles (ONA), and The Satanic Temple (TST)—often accuse one another of being fraudulent Satanists and/or ignorant of true Satanism.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1/> | |||
A LaVeyan Satanist views himself as his or her own god; the LaVeyan Satanic ]s are quite similar to ]'s ], with an eye towards furthering the Satanist's ends. The LaVeyan Satanist maintains that those who find themselves naturally aligned with Satanism should not adhere to ''herd mentality'' and assume there is something ethically wrong with them, but should instead adopt an individualistic attitude, and consequently should strive constantly to stand head-and-shoulders above the so-called '']'', and not hesitate to exploit their ''misguided and naive'' altruism as necessary. | |||
=== |
===Related terms=== | ||
Because the original concept of Satan came from Judaism and was embraced by Christianity, and because Satanists, almost by definition, oppose the teachings of those religions, people drawn to Satanism will often move on to "post-Satanism", i.e. to a religion that does not declare itself "Satanic", but includes elements of Satanism (e.g. ]). Others may regards themselves as Satanists but promote mythological figures and traditions outside of Christianity or Judaism.<ref name="Granholm-2012">{{cite book |last1=Granholm |first1=Kennet |editor1-last=Petersen |editor1-first=Jesper Aa. |editor2-last=Faxneld |editor2-first=Per |title=The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity |date=November 2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |pages=209–228 |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/11601/chapter-abstract/160464629?redirectedFrom=fulltext |access-date=6 January 2024 |chapter=10. The Left-Hand Path and Post-Satanism: The Temple of Set and the Evolution of Satanism}}</ref> These religions are sometimes called Satanic and sometimes post-Satanic.{{#tag:ref|For example the ], despite being a splinter group of the Church of Satan, venerates the deity Set, considering ''Set'' to be the true name of Satan.|group=Note}} | |||
Diane E. Taub and Lawrence D. Nelson complain that Satanism "is frequently defined either too broadly or too narrowly", with accusers sometimes including non-satanic groups such as ], ], Eastern religions as well as ]; and academics (for example Carlson and Larue){{sfn|Carlson|Larue|1989|p=11}} and others sometimes restricting its definition to "recognized Satanic churches and their members", excluding those who "believes in a literal Satan". Taub and Nelson define Satanism as "the literal or symbolic worship of Satan, the enemy of the Judeo-Christian God".{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=525}} | |||
Religious Satanism is often similar in outlook and attitude to Philosophical Satanism, though it is generally a prerequisite that the Satanist accept a theological and metaphysical ] involving one or more God(s) who are either ] in the strictest, Abrahamic sense, or specially created to identify with or represent the practitioner. A Satan represented in the latter group may be entirely of the practitioner's mind, or may be an adoption from another (usually pre-Christian) religion. | |||
==Accusations of Satanism== | |||
Depending on the Satanists in question, this God (or Gods) may be any in a variety of deities, sometimes taken from ancient faiths; with common ones being ] of Egyptian theology, any number of ancient ] Gods or Goddesses, sometimes Gods of Greek or Roman mythology (], for instance). Others claim a largely original God, although it is usually said by those Satanists that their deity is in fact very old, perhaps from ancient pre-history and often being the first God worshipped by humans (though such claims are unverifiable at best). | |||
<!-- Groups or individuals alleged to have practiced Satanism before the appearance of modern Satanism in the 1960s --> | |||
According to author Arthur Lyons, "Satanic religions are as old as monotheism and have their origins in Persia of the sixth century",{{#tag:ref|An abstract of Lyon's book appeared on US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs web page.<ref name="Lyons-1988">{{cite book |last1=Lyons |first1=Arthur. |title=Satan Wants You: The Cult of Devil Worship in America |date=1988 |publisher=Mysterious Press |url=https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/satan-wants-you-cult-devil-worship-america |access-date=16 January 2024}}</ref> |group=Note}} | |||
and Joe Carter of the conservative ecumenical journal '']'' writes that "real satanism has been around since the beginning of history, selling an appealing message: Your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God."<ref name="Carter-2011-fountainhead">{{cite journal |last1=Carter |first1=Joe |title=THE FOUNTAINHEAD OF SATANISM |journal=First Things |date=8 June 2011 |url=https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2011/06/the-fountainhead-of-satanism |access-date=16 January 2024}}</ref>{{#tag:ref|In the 19th century, Charles Baudelaire (and others with variations of the wording) was quoted saying, "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."<ref name="QI-trick-2018">{{cite web |title=The Greatest Trick the Devil Ever Pulled Was Convincing the World He Didn't Exist |url=https://quoteinvestigator.com/2018/03/20/devil/ |website=Quote Investigator |access-date=16 January 2024 |date=20 March 2018}}</ref>|group=Note}} | |||
On the other hand, religious scholar Joseph Laycock writes that the "available evidence suggests" that Satanism began as "an imaginary religion Christians invented to demonize their opponents".<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1-Invention/> | |||
Others worship a stricter interpretation of Satan: that of the fallen angel featured in the Christian Bible, though unlike many who see him as being evil as defined by the ], they instead believe him to be correct in his rebellion against God. All these faiths hold in common, however, with each other and with Philosophical Satanists, that man, and specifically the self are the highest priorities. This view is often supported by Satanists' view of the god, who is seen to encourage individuality and freedom of thought, and the quest to raise one's self up through means such as ] and similar to Nietzschean ]. | |||
Confessions of worship of Satan came only after torture or other forms of coercion in early modern Europe.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1-Invention/> While early stories of satanic activity have been commonly labeled and regarded as propaganda based on falsehood, they also partially shaped the beliefs of what would become modern religious Satanism. Those who absorbed and accepted the tales sometimes began to imitate them (celebrating Black Masses for example), a process known to folklorists as "ostension".<ref>B. Ellis, Aliens, ‘’Ghosts, and Cults: Legends We Live’’ (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2003).</ref> | |||
===Medieval and Early Modern Christendom=== | |||
One example of this would be the Abrahamic Satan, such as the Serpent in ] encouraging mankind to partake of the fruit of the ], saying "''Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.''", with the clear implication, coinciding with the beliefs of all Satanists, that mankind should know what is better for itself than any God which would forbid knowledge and self-government. Because of the common position that their faiths are in fact very old, or the oldest, Religious Satanists sometimes refer to themselves as "''Traditional Satanists''" and Philosophical Satanists as "''Contemporary Satanists''". | |||
{{See also|European witchcraft|Maleficium (sorcery)|Witch-cult hypothesis}} | |||
====Setian Satanism==== | |||
As Christianity expanded throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe, it came into contact with a variety of other religions, which it regarded as "]". Christianity being a monotheist religion, Christian theologians believed that since there was only one God (the God of Christianity) the gods and goddesses with supernatural powers venerated by these "pagans" could not be genuine divinities but must actually be demons.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=23}} However, they did not believe that "pagans" were deliberately worshipping devils, but were instead simply misguided and unaware of the "true" God.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=24}} | |||
According to this sect, the ] ] ], is the real Dark Lord behind the name Satan. They have their own concept of the ]. | |||
], ''Three Witches'', {{circa|1514}}]] | |||
This type of Satanism maintains that the ] ran into an adversary in Egypt who was the ] of the ] Dynasty, when Set was the principal pharaonic Deity. After the Pharaoh expelled the Hebrews from ], the Hebrew ] ]s wrote "]", demonstrating the enormity of this event to the Hebrew people. However, there are apparently no Egyptian records to back up any of the ] claims except a passing mention of the ] kicking many foreigners out at that time — not just Hebrews. Even so, the impact of this expulsion was large enough to the Hebrews to warrant their calling Egypt and its Seti Pharaoh "ha stn", the adversary. Setian Satanists theorize that "Satan" is a wrong or slanderous label for a legitimate Egyptian God, the God Set. | |||
Those Christian groups regarded as ] by the ] were treated differently, with theologians arguing that they were deliberately worshipping the Devil.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=24–26}} This was accompanied by claims that such individuals engaged in acts of evil—incestuous sexual orgies, the murder of infants, and ]—all stock accusations that had previously been leveled at Christians themselves in the ].{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=25–26}} In Christian iconography, the Devil and demons were given the physical traits of figures from ], such as the god ], ]s, and ]s.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=24}} | |||
The first recorded example of such an accusation being made within ] took place in ] in 1022, when two clerics were tried for allegedly venerating a demon.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=25}} Throughout the ], this accusation would be applied to a wide range of Christian heretical groups, including the ], ], ], ], and the ].{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=28}} The ] were accused of worshipping an ] known as ], with Lucifer having appeared at their meetings in the form of a cat.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=126}} As well as these Christian groups, these claims were also made about Europe's Jewish community.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=28–29}} In the 13th century, there were also references made to a group of "Luciferians" led by a woman named Lucardis which hoped to see Satan rule in Heaven. References to this group continued into the 14th century, although historians studying the allegations concur that these Luciferians were probably a fictitious invention.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=29–31}} | |||
The practices and ] of the Set sect are very oriented towards cultivating selfhood. They reject the dissolving of the individual into oneness with existence, and celebrate the separation of the individual self from the rest of the ]. Some followers believe in Set as a real theistic conscious being that appears in revelations and delivers messages, while others revere Set as a more of a principle. How historically correct their picture of Set is might be considered debatable. | |||
Within Christian thought, the idea developed that certain individuals could make ].{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=57}} This may have emerged after observing that pacts with gods and goddesses played a role in various pre-Christian belief systems, or that such pacts were also made as part of the Christian cult of saints.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=58}} Another possibility is that it derives from a misunderstanding of ]'s condemnation of ] in his '']'', written in the late 4th century. Here, he stated that people who consulted augurs were entering ''quasi pacts'' (covenants) with demons.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=57–58}} The idea of the diabolical pact made with demons was popularized across Europe in the story of ], probably based in part on the real life ].{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=60–63}} | |||
This type of Set-Satanism is a legally tax-exempt ] in the ]. | |||
As the late medieval gave way to the ], European Christendom experienced a schism between the established ] and the breakaway ] movement. In the ensuing ] and ] (1517–1700 CE), both Catholics and Protestants accused each other of deliberately being in league with Satan.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=35}} It was in this context that the terms ''Satanist'' and ''Satanism'' emerged.{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1p=257 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=2}} | |||
=== Sat/Tan Satanism === | |||
''Main article: ] | |||
====Witch trials==== | |||
Sat/Tan Satanism is a unique, quasi-philosophical/quasi-theological brand of Satanism which maintains both religious and non-religious philosophical influences, either inwardly focusing or outwardly. Sat and Tan are ] words meaning respectively "''Being''" and "''Becoming''" (''stretching forth''), and it has been called by followers often also '']'' or '']'' Satanism. It maintains that before the universe existed, there was a vast Darkness which represented the concepts of chaos and night, and within that Darkness, there was a Flame or Light which represented ''Divine Right'', or creative capacity. The Flame or Light flared up and spread to the uttermost corners of the Darkness, creating the universe as we know it. Sat/Tan Satanism maintains that today a theoretical "Darkness" still exists throughout the cosmos, and that while all life possesses the creative Flame or Spark of ''Divine Right'', only those individuals defined in this article as Satanists recognize and properly nurture their own Divinity (in the ''Sat/Tan'' sense). Those who neglect it are seen as living in the Darkness of ignorance. As such, the movement may be at least superficially compared to certain forms of ] or ]. | |||
] used against ], 1577. Estimates of the number of people executed for witchcraft in Europe vary between 40,000 and 100,000.]] | |||
An undoubtedly interesting note is that there are parallels between '']'' religion of ] and Sat/Tan Satanism; where ] is seen as the Flame and the ] are seen as living in the Darkness of meek or ignorant submission the so-called "Will of the Force" (''the Sith believe the Force has no will except when put to proper direction by the will of the Sith Acolyte himself''). | |||
The early modern period also saw fear of Satanists reach its "historical apogee" in the form of the ],{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=36}} when between 30,000 and 50,000 alleged witches were executed.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=36}} This came about as the accusations which had been leveled at medieval heretics, among them that of devil-worship, were applied to the pre-existing idea of ], or practitioner of malevolent ].{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1p=133 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=37}} The idea of a conspiracy of Satanic witches was developed by educated elites, although the concept of malevolent witchcraft was a widespread part of popular belief, and ] ideas about the night witch, the ], and the dance of the fairies were incorporated into it.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=38}} The earliest trials took place in Northern Italy and France, before spreading it out to other areas of Europe and to Britain's North American colonies, being carried out by the legal authorities in both Catholic and Protestant regions.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=36}} | |||
Most historians agree that the majority of those persecuted in these witch trials were innocent of any involvement in Devil worship.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=70}} Historian Darren Eldridge writes that claims that there actually was a cult of devil-worshippers being pursued by witch hunters "have not survived the scrutiny of surviving trial records" done by historians from 1962 to 2012.<ref name=devil-oldridge-2012-39>{{cite book|title=The Devil, a Very Short Introduction| last1=Oldridge| first1=Darren| publisher=Oxford University Press |page=39 |year=2012}}</ref> | |||
=== Satanic cults === | |||
However, in their summary of the evidence for the trials, the historians Geoffrey Scarre and John Callow thought it "without doubt" that some of those accused in the trials had been guilty of employing magic in an attempt to harm their enemies and were thus genuinely guilty of witchcraft.{{sfn|Scarre|Callow|2001|p=2}} | |||
''Main article: ]'' | |||
====Affair of the Poisons==== | |||
The existence of large networks of organized Satanists involved in ] activities, ], and ] is occasionally claimed, often by ] religious movements. Those claims have never been substantiated and are widely believed to be untrue. | |||
{{main|Affair of the Poisons}} | |||
In a scandal starting with the poisoning of three people, prominent members of the French aristocracy, including members of the king's inner circle, were implicated and sentenced on charges of poisoning and witchcraft. Between 1677 and 1682, during the reign of King ], 36 people were executed in Satanic panic known to history as the ].<ref name=JPLS2023:chpt.2-Poisons/> At least some of the accusers were implicated others under torture and in hopes of saving their lives. These highly unreliable reports include what "may be the first report of a satanic mass using a woman as an altar".<ref name=JPLS2023:chpt.2-Poisons>]: Chapter 2, Imagining the Black Mass. The Affair of the Poisons</ref> | |||
=== |
===18th- to 20th-century Christendom=== | ||
].]] | |||
This section deals with the Satanism conjured by the Inquisition-era Church. This is the Satanism accused of baby-eating, goat-killing, virgin sacrifice, and general hatred of Christianity. These ideas were outlined in the ], perhaps the definitive book on such acts. Ironically, the book was generally not accepted by the Church at the time of the Inquisition, but has gone on to be the template of modern Devil Worship . | |||
The ] and ] changed humanity's understanding of the world. The mathematics of ] and psychology of ] "left little space for the intervention of supernatural beings".<ref name=devil-oldridge-2012-41>{{cite book|title=The Devil, a Very Short Introduction| last1=Oldridge| first1=Darren| publisher=Oxford University Press |page=41 |year=2012}}</ref> ]'s theory of ] undermined the doctrine of the Fall in the Garden of Eden and the role of the diabolical serpent, while also providing an "alternative account of human evil" in the form of "a residual effect of our animal nature".<ref name="devil-oldridge-2012-67">{{cite book|title=The Devil, a Very Short Introduction| last1=Oldridge| first1=Darren| publisher=Oxford University Press |page=43 |year=2012}}</ref> The ] and urbanization disturbed traditional social relations and folk ideas to undermine belief in witchcraft and the devil.<ref name=devil-oldridge-2012-67/> Understanding of disorders of the mind undercut demonic possession.<ref name="devil-oldridge-2012-67"/> But while the hunting and killing of alleged witches waned, belief in Satan did not disappear. | |||
In the modern world (and likely in the Inquisition times), there is no proof to suggest that such Devil Worship is practiced . This said, there are occasionally reports of people (often teenagers) who attempt to emulate such a religion through acts such as killing small animals, or claiming to have made a pact with Satan or other such ideas. This is an individual emulation of the acts described in The Malleus Maleficarum, not any sort of widespread organization. | |||
During the 18th century, gentleman's social clubs became increasingly prominent in Britain and Ireland, among the most secretive of which were the ]s, which were first reported in the 1720s.{{sfnm|1a1=Introvigne|1y=2016|1pp=58–59 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=66}} The most famous of these groups was the Order of the Knights of Saint Francis, which was founded circa 1750 by the aristocrat ] and which assembled first at his estate at ] and later in ].{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=66–67}} A number of contemporary press sources portrayed these as gatherings of ] ] where Christianity was mocked, and toasts were made to the Devil.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=66}} Beyond these sensationalist accounts, which may not be accurate portrayals of actual events, little is known about the activities of the Hellfire Clubs.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=66}} Introvigne suggested that they may have engaged in a form of "playful Satanism" in which Satan was invoked "to show a daring contempt for conventional morality" rather than to pay homage to him.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=60–61}} | |||
=== Other Organizations, Groups, Etc. === | |||
The ] of 1789 dealt a blow to the hegemony of the ] in parts of Europe, and soon a number of Catholic authors began making claims that it had been masterminded by a conspiratorial group of Satanists.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=71}} Among the first to do so was French Catholic priest Jean-Baptiste Fiard, who publicly claimed that a wide range of individuals, from the ] to ], were part of a Satanic conspiracy.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=71–73}} Fiard's ideas were furthered by ] (1765–1851), who devoted a lengthy book to this ]; he claimed that Satanists had supernatural powers allowing them to curse people and to shapeshift into both cats and fleas.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=74–78}} Although most of his contemporaries regarded Berbiguier as suffering from mental illness,{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=84–85}} his ideas gained credence among many occultists, including ], a ] who used them for the basis of his book, ''The Temple of Satan''.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=85–86}} | |||
In the ] sect of early Christianity, the ] was praised as the giver of knowledge. Sometimes Satan was also referred to, under the names ] or "the light-bringer". Some ] claimed that the being declared ] by ]s and ]s was in fact lesser being known as the ], whose name derives from the creator figure in ]'s ]; a very few Gnostic sects identified this figure with Satan; others (such as the ]) saw Satan as a subsequent creation of the Demiurge. | |||
A reaction to this was the ] in 1890s France, where an anti-clerical writer ] (aka Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès), publicly converted to Catholicism and then published several works alleging to expose the Satanic doings of ]. In 1897, Taxil called a press conference promising to introduce a key character of his stories but instead announced that his revelations about the Freemasons were made up, and thanked the Catholic clergy for helping to publicize his stories.<ref name=Confession>{{cite web | |||
Some early Gnostic sects, such as the ] and the followers of ], were accused of horrific acts, including the eating (in horrific imitation of the sacrament) of semen, menses and aborted fetuses. These acts were committed with the apparent justification of libertinism; given that the material universe was not God's creation, it could be put to any use with no moral consequences. Accounts of these barbaric acts are not held to be at all credible, as the accusations were rhetorical attacks against these groups by such ] writers as ]. | |||
|url= https://www.learnreligions.com/alternative-religion-4684831 | |||
|accessdate= 25 October 2007 | |||
|title= The Confession of Leo Taxil | |||
|date= 25 April 1897 | |||
|archive-date= 2008-05-13 | |||
|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080513164148/http://altreligion.about.com/library/texts/bl_confessiontaxil.htm | |||
|url-status= dead | |||
}}</ref> Nine years later he told an American magazine that at first he thought readers would recognize his tales as obvious nonsense, "amusement pure and simple", but when he realized they believed his stories and that there was "lots of money" to be made in publishing them, he continued to perpetrate the hoax.<ref name="National Magazine, 1906">''National Magazine, an Illustrated American Monthly'', Volume XXIV: April – September 1906, pages 228 and 229</ref> Around the same time, another convert to Catholicism ], also helped promote the concept of active Satanist groups in his 1891 work ''Là-bas'' (Down There). Huysmans "helped to cement" the idea the black mass as Satanic rite and inversion of the Roman Catholic mass, with a naked woman for an altar.<ref name="Britannica-White"/> (Unlike Taxil, his conversion was apparently genuine and his book was published as fiction.) | |||
In the early 20th century, the British novelist ] produced a range of influential novels in which his protagonists battled Satanic groups.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=266–267}} At the same time, non-fiction authors such as ] and Rollo Ahmed published books claiming that Satanic groups practicing black magic were still active across the world, although they provided no evidence that this was the case.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=141–142}} During the 1950s, various British tabloid newspapers repeated such claims, largely basing their accounts on the allegations of one woman, Sarah Jackson, who claimed to have been a member of such a group.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=143–149}} In 1973, the British Christian Doreen Irvine published ''From Witchcraft to Christ'', in which she claimed to have been a member of a Satanic group that gave her supernatural powers, such as the ability to ], before she escaped and embraced Christianity.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=159–161}} | |||
However, Gnostic sects were commonly more liberal in nature than emergent orthodox groups; for example, in viewing sexual congress as a good, even a potentially spiritual act, and in allowing woman priests and bishops to adminsiter sacraments. There is evidence that Valentinians performed a religious ceremony known as the Bridal Chamber, in which the physical union of a man and woman was viewed as an earthly reenactment of God's completeness; the Gnostic conception of the divine was as an androgyne, as opposed to the orthodoxy identification of him as male. Such criticisms as Irenaeus' may be the deliberate exagerration of these misdeeds (from the point of view of orthodoxy). | |||
In the United States during the 1960s and 1970s, various Christian preachers—the most famous being ] in his 1972 book ''The Satan-Seller''—claimed that they had been members of Satanic groups who carried out sex rituals and animal sacrifices before discovering Christianity.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=164–170}} According to Gareth Medway in his historical examination of Satanism, these stories were "a series of inventions by insecure people and hack writers, each one based on a previous story, exaggerated a little more each time".{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=161}} | |||
The ] (ONA) has labeled itself Traditional Satanist and considers Satanism to be an individual quest which goes far beyond the gratification of the pleasure-principle and involves the arduous achievement of self-mastery and self-overcoming in a ]an sense, with the aim of cosmic wisdom. Their conception of Satanism is practical, with an emphasis on individual growth into realms of darkness and danger through risky acts of prowess. In addition, the ONA seek to change, and disrupt, society itself. They espouse human sacrifice, which they see as the culling of "opfers," victims who are chosen according to strict guidelines. The use of the term "traditional" by these Satanists (ONA) is viewed by some as improper because the ONA refuses to provide any evidence of an old tradition, countering that it is the duty of each initiate to work things out for themselves. In addition, it is felt that "Traditional Satanism" as a label applies better, or at least equally well, to parts of the gnostic movement and its modern remnants. | |||
Other publications made allegations of Satanism against historical figures. The 1970s saw the publication of the Romanian Protestant preacher ]'s book in which he argued—without corroborating evidence—that the socio-political theorist ] had been a Satanist.{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1pp=262–263 |2a1=Introvigne|2y=2016|2p=66}} | |||
The ] is a Scandinavian example of a Neo-Gnostic Satanic current. | |||
The MLO is a Chaos-Gnostic Order that "seeks the true Light of Lucifer through the study, development and practice of all forms of dark, gnostic and Satanic Magical systems". | |||
===Ritual abuse hysteria=== | |||
], also known as DNSS, was the first LaVey-Satanic society in Norway and represents a more liberal or social-democratic Satanism, as writer ] said it, compared to the more classic American Satanism. | |||
{{main|Satanic panic}} | |||
At the end of the 20th century, a ] arose from claims that a Devil-worshipping cult was committing sexual abuse, murder, and cannibalism in its rituals, and including children among the victims of its rites.{{sfn|La Fontaine|2016|p=13}} Initially, the alleged perpetrators of such crimes were labeled "witches", although the term ''Satanist'' was soon adopted as a favored alternative,{{sfn|La Fontaine|2016|p=13}} and the phenomenon itself came to be called "the Satanism Scare".{{sfn|La Fontaine|2016|p=15}} Those active in the scare alleged that there was a conspiracy of organized Satanists who occupied prominent positions throughout society, from the police to politicians, and that they had been powerful enough to cover up their crimes.{{sfnm|1a1=La Fontaine|1y=2016|1p=13 |2a1=Introvigne|2y=2016|2p=381}} | |||
{{Quote box|width=25em|align=left|quote=Preceded by some significant but isolated episodes in the 1970s, a great Satanism scare exploded in the 1980s in the United States and Canada and was subsequently exported towards England, Australia, and other countries. It was unprecedented in history. It surpassed even the results of ]'s propaganda, and has been compared with the most virulent periods of witch hunting. The scare started in 1980 and declined slowly between 1990... and 1994, when official British and American reports denied the real existence of ritual satanic crimes. Particularly outside the U.S. and U.K., however, its consequences are still felt today.|source=Sociologist of religion Massimo Introvigne, 2016{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=372}} }} | |||
] is a Norwegian concept of Satanic illumination, which is set up by ] and ], also known as NST. NST represents the philosophy of DNSS as well, but is more involved in the process of interaction between Satanists. ] is the social network of lodges throughout the country, thus making it possible to interact socially with other Satanists. | |||
One of the primary sources for the scare was '']'', a 1980 book by the Canadian psychiatrist ] in which he detailed what he claimed were the ] of his patient (and wife) Michelle Smith. Smith had claimed that as a child she had been abused by her family in Satanic rituals in which babies were sacrificed and Satan himself appeared.{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1pp=175–177 |2a1=Introvigne|2y=2016|2pp=374–376}}{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=115–116}} In 1983, allegations were made that the McMartin family—owners of a preschool in California—were guilty of sexually abusing the children in their care during Satanic rituals. The allegations resulted in a ], in which all of the accused would eventually be cleared.{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1pp=178–183 |2a1=Introvigne|2y=2016|2pp=405–406}}{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=116–120}} The publicity generated by the case resulted in similar allegations being made in various other parts of the United States.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=183}} | |||
In early 2004, ], a former ] politician told a '']'' reporter that he had formed an "occult fraternity, to finish the work that the ] has previously botched." He then displayed a platinum medallion which he had commissioned that resembled a ] planetary sigil. He has christened this neo-Satanic fraternity The ]. He said membership in his "fraternity" is restricted to those whom he knows personally and that his group does not solicit memberships. He also stated that this "Order" is named in honor of the ] god Mars, whom he claims is closely aligned with ] god ]. | |||
A key claim by the "anti-Satanists" of the Satanic Scare was that any child's claim about Satanic ritual abuse must be true, because children do not lie.{{sfn|La Fontaine|2016|p=16}} Although some involved in the anti-Satanism movement were from Jewish and secular backgrounds,{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1p=369 |2a1=La Fontaine|2y=2016|2p=15}} a central part was played by fundamentalist and evangelical Christians, in particular ] Christians, with Christian groups holding conferences and producing books and videotapes to promote belief in the conspiracy.{{sfn|La Fontaine|2016|p=15}} Various figures in law enforcement also came to be promoters of the conspiracy theory, with such "cult cops" holding various conferences to promote it.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=191–195}} The scare was later imported to the United Kingdom through visiting evangelicals and became popular among some of the country's social workers,{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=220–221}} resulting in a range of accusations and trials across Britain.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=234–248}} | |||
The ] is an organization of the religion founded by Michael S. Margolin based on the Ancient and Accepted Rite of Free Masonry's definition of Satanism as described in ]'s work '']''. This religion is not based on those of the popular Satanists of our day, nor Hollywood and Christian propaganda, except for Aleister Crowley. The religion contains no dogma in of itself, and encourages its followers to believe in whatever they like, as long as they do not attempt to push such beliefs on others. The aim of this religion is the ultimate destruction of religions through the advancement of individual freedom and social responsibility. The Sinagogue of Satan does not promote self-indulgence (in contrast to LaVeyan Satanism), but rather self-expression balanced with social responsibility. | |||
In the late 1980s, the Satanic Scare had lost its impetus following increasing skepticism about such allegations,{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=210–211}} and a number of those who had been convicted of perpetrating Satanic ritual abuse saw their convictions overturned.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=213}} In 1990, an agent of the U.S. ], Ken Lanning, revealed that he had investigated 300 allegations of Satanic ritual abuse and found no evidence for Satanism or ritualistic activity in any of them.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=213}} In the UK, the ] commissioned the anthropologist Jean La Fontaine to examine the allegations of SRA.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=249}} She noted that while approximately half did reveal evidence of genuine sexual abuse of children, none revealed any evidence that Satanist groups had been involved or that any murders had taken place.{{sfn|La Fontaine|2016|pp=13–14}} She noted three examples in which lone individuals engaged in child molestation had created a ritual performance to facilitate their sexual acts, with the intent of frightening their victims and justifying their actions, but that none of these child molesters were involved in wider Satanist groups.{{sfnm|1a1=Medway|1y=2001|1p=118 |2a1=La Fontaine|2y=2016|2p=14}} | |||
See also ], ] for groups that have been called Satanist but do not accept that label. | |||
By 1994, the Satanic ritual abuse hysteria had died down in the US and UK,{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=372}} and by the 21st century, hysteria about Satanism has waned in most Western countries, although allegations of Satanic ritual abuse continued to surface in parts of continental Europe and Latin America.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=456}} In the United States SRA ideas persisted among much of the public even as law enforcement had grown tired of false leads. A 1994 survey for the women's magazine '']'' reported in 1994, | |||
==Satanic philosophy== | |||
*70 percent of those polled "believe that at least some people who claim that they were abused by satanic cults as children, but repressed the memories for years, are telling the truth"<ref>Ross, A. 1994. "Blame it on the Devil". ''Redbook'' June 1994, p.88</ref><ref name=Footnote213/> | |||
LaVey's "9 Satanic Statements", a sort of philosophical outline to defining Satanism, were as follows: | |||
*32 percent agreed with the statement, "The FBI and the police ignore evidence because they don't want to admit the cults exist",<ref name=Footnote213/><ref>Ross, A. 1994. "Blame it on the Devil". Redbook June: 86–89. 110, 114, 1</ref> and | |||
# Satan represents indulgence instead of abstinence. | |||
*22 percent agreed that cult leaders use brainwashing to ensure that the victims would not tell.<ref name=Footnote213>213 W. Kaminer, ''Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials: The Rise of Irrationalism and Perils of Piety'' (New York: Vintage Books, 1999), p. 193.</ref> | |||
# Satan represents vital existence instead of spiritual pipe dreams. | |||
# Satan represents undefiled wisdom instead of hypocritical self-deceit. | |||
# Satan represents kindness to those who deserve it instead of love wasted on ingrates. | |||
# Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek. | |||
# Satan represents responsibility to the responsible instead of concern for psychic vampires. | |||
# Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all-fours, who, because of his “divine spiritual and intellectual development,” has become the most vicious animal of all. | |||
# Satan represents all of the so-called sins, as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification. | |||
# Satan has been the best friend the Church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years. | |||
===QAnon=== | |||
Matching these, LaVey also identified 9 Satanic sins, namely: | |||
{{main|QAnon}} | |||
: ], pretentiousness (putting on airs), ] (expecting others to give back to you what you give to them), ], ], lack of perspective, forgetfulness of past orthodoxies (i.e. accepting something as new and different which is merely a repackaging of the old or the discredited), counterproductive ] (ie pride of a type which undermines one's own goals), and lack of ]s. | |||
Another Satanic conspiracy theory arose in the United States by 2017,<ref name="nymag">{{Cite news |last=Martineau |first=Paris |date=19 December 2017 |title=The Storm Is the New Pizzagate – Only Worse |work=] |url=https://nymag.com/selectall/2017/12/qanon-4chan-the-storm-conspiracy-explained.html |access-date=26 March 2018 |issn=0028-7369}}</ref> with unsubstantiated allegations of organized Devil-worshippers in prominent positions committing sexual abuse, murder, and cannibalism. The source of such claims began within a far-right political movement, made by an anonymous individual or individuals known as "Q", which were relayed and developed by online communities and influencers. The central QAnon claim purports that a global child ] ring made up of Democratic politicians, Hollywood actors, high-ranking government officials, business tycoons, and medical experts,{{sfn|Rothschild|2021|p=21}} were kidnapping, sexually abusing and eating children, but that (then-President) ] would round up the cabal and bring them to justice in a climactic event known to supporters as "the storm".{{sfn|Rothschild|2021|pp=9, 28, 175}}<ref name="far-right conspiracy theory">{{cite journal |last1=Guglielmi |first1=Giorgia |title=The next-generation bots interfering with the US election |journal=] |date=28 October 2020 |volume=587 |issue=7832 |page=21 |doi=10.1038/d41586-020-03034-5 |pmid=33116324 |bibcode=2020Natur.587...21G |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Bracewell">{{cite journal |last=Bracewell |first=Lorna |date=21 January 2021 |title=Gender, Populism, and the QAnon Conspiracy Movement |journal=] |publisher=] |location=Cardiff, England|volume=5 |pages=615727 |doi=10.3389/fsoc.2020.615727 |doi-access=free |issn=2297-7775 |pmc=8022489 |pmid=33869533 |s2cid=231654586}}</ref><ref name="Crossley">{{cite journal |last=Crossley |first=James |date=September 2021 |title=The Apocalypse and Political Discourse in an Age of COVID |journal=] |publisher=] |location=Thousand Oaks, California |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=93–111 |doi=10.1177/0142064X211025464 |doi-access=free |issn=1745-5294 |s2cid=237329082}}</ref> With the lack of any evidence of child abuse or harm, and failure of the prophesized "storm" to appear before the inauguration of a new president, the conspiracy has waned but not entirely disappeared.<ref name="Dickey-Qanon-16-8-23">{{cite news |last1=Dickey |first1=Colin |title=From Sound of Freedom to Ron DeSantis: how QAnon's crazy conspiracy theories went mainstream |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/16/qanon-conspiracy-theory-sound-of-freedom-trump-desantis |access-date=2 January 2024 |work=The Guardian |date=16 August 2023}}</ref> | |||
==Precursors of modern Satanism== | |||
Note: ] can also refer to an ] idea attributed to Descartes, suggesting that one person is the only one to actually experience existence and that all others are merely figments of the imagination of this individual | |||
=== Literary === | |||
He further outlined 11 so-called Satanic rules, which while not exactly a moral code, appear to be some kind of general guidelines for living: | |||
From the late 1600s through to the 1800s, the character of Satan was increasingly rendered unimportant in western philosophy, and ignored in Christian theology, while in folklore he came to be seen as a foolish rather than a menacing figure.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=29}} The development of new values in the ] (in particular, those of ] and ]) contributed to a shift in many Europeans' concept of Satan.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=29}} In this context, a number of individuals took Satan out of the traditional Christian narrative and reread and reinterpreted him in light of their own time and their own interests, in turn generating new and different portraits of Satan.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=28}} | |||
# Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked. | |||
# Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them. | |||
# When in another’s lair, show him respect or else do not go there. | |||
# If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy. | |||
# Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal. | |||
# Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved. | |||
# Acknowledge the power of magic if you have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained. | |||
# Do not complain about anything to which you need not subject yourself. | |||
# Do not harm little children. | |||
# Do not kill non-human animals unless you are attacked or for your food. | |||
# When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him. | |||
The shifting concept of Satan owes many of its origins to ]'s epic poem '']'' (1667), in which Satan features as the protagonist.{{sfnm|1a1=Dyrendal|1a2=Lewis|1a3=Petersen|1y=2016|1p=28 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=70}} Milton was a ] and had never intended for his depiction of Satan to be a sympathetic one.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=28, 30}} However, in portraying Satan as a victim of his own pride who rebelled against the Judeo-Christian god, Milton humanized him and also allowed him to be interpreted as a rebel against tyranny.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=30}} In this vein, the 19th century saw the emergence of what has been termed ''literary Satanism'' or ''romantic Satanism'',{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=73}} where in poetry, plays, and novels, God is portrayed not as benevolent but using His omnipotent power for tyranny. Whereas in Christian doctrine Satan was an enemy of not only god but humanity, in the romantic portrayal he was a brave, noble, rebel against tyranny, a friend to other victims of the all powerful bully, i.e. humans. These writers saw Satan as a metaphor to criticize the power of churches and state and to champion the values of reason and liberty.<ref name=JPLS2023:chpt.1-Invention>]: chapter 1. What Is Satanism? Anton LaVey and the Invention of Satanism</ref> | |||
It is interesting to note that some of these rules appear opposite to traits commonly perceived as "Satanic." Specifically, proselytism (in this case, actively turning others to the worship of Satan) is strongly discouraged, and the prohibition of harm against children and animals contradicts reputed Satanic fondness for sacrifice (see ]), both of which are often erroneously associated with Satanists. | |||
This was how Milton's Satan was understood by ]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2kk1AQAAIAAJ&q=%22but+he+is+a+satanist+only%22+%22dryden%22 |title=Seventeenth-century Critics and Biographers of Milton – M. Manuel – Google Books |date=23 July 2010 |accessdate=2022-10-08|last1=Manuel |first1=M. }}</ref> and later readers such as the publisher ],{{sfnm|1a1=Dyrendal|1a2=Lewis|1a3=Petersen|1y=2016|1pp=28, 30 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2pp=69–70}} and the anarchist philosopher ], who reflected it in his 1793 book '']''.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=30}} ''Paradise Lost'' gained a wide readership in the 18th century, both in Britain and in continental Europe, where it had been translated into French by ].{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=70}} Milton thus became "a central character in rewriting Satanism" and would be viewed by many later religious Satanists as a "''de facto'' Satanist".{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=28}} | |||
==Criticisms of Satanism== | |||
According to Ruben van Luijk, this cannot be seen as a "coherent movement with a single voice, but rather as a ''post factum'' identified group of sometimes widely divergent authors among whom a similar theme is found".{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=108}} For the literary Satanists, Satan was depicted as a benevolent and sometimes heroic figure,{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=69}} with these more sympathetic portrayals proliferating in the art and poetry of many ] and ] figures.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=28}} For these individuals, Satanism was not a religious belief or ritual activity, but rather a "strategic use of a symbol and a character as part of artistic and political expression".{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=31}} | |||
The idea of worshipping Satan has predictably received a great deal of criticism from the major religions, although most has come from ], in the form of both constructive debate and open hostility. | |||
], '']'', 1848]] | |||
* The most fundamental criticism seems to be that Satanism is purely reactionary as a religion and philosophy, and as such can only be defined by its opposition to what is perceived as the hypocritical, stupid, tired, weak, boring, failings of mainstream philosophies and religions. It also draws its whole understanding of the meaning and nature of Satan or Satanic worship from the literature which it intends to oppose. Rev. D.R. Deinsen notes that Satanist writers of the internet sound like "enraged frustrated teenagers who need a target to pin their angst on and need one now.". | |||
Among the romanticist poets to adopt this concept of Satan was the English poet ], who had been influenced by Milton.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=71–72}} In his poem '']'', Shelley praised the "serpent", a reference to Satan, as a force for good in the universe.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=97–98}} | |||
Another was Shelley's fellow British poet ], who included Satanic themes in his 1821 play '']'', which was a dramatization of the Biblical story of ].{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=73}} These more positive portrayals also developed in France; one example was the 1823 work ''Eloa'' by ].{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=74–75}} Satan was also adopted by the French poet ], who made the character's fall from Heaven a central aspect of his '']'', in which he outlined his own ].{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=105–107}} | |||
Although the likes of Shelley and Byron promoted a positive image of Satan in their work, there is no evidence that any of them performed religious rites to venerate him, and thus they cannot be considered to be religious Satanists.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=108}} | |||
Radical left-wing political ideas had been spread by the ] of 1775–83 and the ] of 1789–99. The figure of Satan, who was seen as having rebelled against the tyranny imposed by Jehovah, was appealing to many of the radical leftists of the period.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=77–79}} For them, Satan was "a symbol for the struggle against tyranny, injustice, and oppression... a mythical figure of rebellion for an age of revolutions, a larger-than-life individual for an age of individualism, a free thinker in an age struggling for free thought".{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=31}} The French anarchist ], who was a staunch critic of Christianity, embraced Satan as a symbol of liberty in several of his writings.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=117–119}} Another prominent 19th century anarchist, the Russian ], similarly described the figure of Satan as "the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds" in his book '']''.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|pp=119–120}} These ideas probably inspired the American ] activist ] to name his anarchist periodical '']''.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=120}} The idea of this "Leftist Satan" declined during the 20th century.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=120}} | |||
* Most Satanists identify with Satan as a rebellious force, however this presupposes the existence of a supreme being, authority and ] to rebel against. Once this recognition has been made, so it is argued, one can only continue to give deferrence to the rebel deity by a conscious act of falsehood on the part of the will. The traditional Christian argument against self-worship centres on the irrefutible fact that we cannot prove ourselves resposible for our own existence, while we may enrich or impoverish our lives through choices made, it all ultimately dies not originate with ourselves. | |||
=== Occult === | |||
* Christian theologians argue that it is impossible for a human being to indulge completely in Satanic evil: All human evil is a corrupted attempt to do something good (eg. to further the gratification or security of one's ownself, even if this is at the expense of other selves). Even a hedonist attempts to seek that recognised as good, if only for himself. However, pain, confusion, isolation and disappointment results when this attempt is not in accord with the laws of God and hence the laws of the universe (i.e. a ] or ]) | |||
], as illustrated by ], has become one of the most common symbols of Satanism.{{sfn|Petersen|2005|pages=444–446}}]] | |||
* Satanism is “philosophy light” and “rhetoric heavy.” Anton LaVey’s greatest skill is said to have been that of a rhetorician. Satanism, so it is argued, proves to be an intellectually shallow glamourisation of human divinity. | |||
In 17th-century Sweden, a number of highway robbers and other outlaws living in the forests informed judges that they venerated Satan because he provided more practical assistance than Jehovah,{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=44–45}} practices now regarded as "folkloric Satanism".{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=44}} | |||
The figure of "Lucifer" was taken up by the French ]ian ] (1810–1875), who shocked convention by turning the traditional figure of evil into a brave rebel against tyranny.<ref name=JPLS2023:chpt.1-Invention/> Lévi has been described as a "Romantic Satanist",{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=107}}{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=37}} a ] literary movement that formed no organizations and did not worship Satan, but did make a crucial break away from the traditional Christian figure of the "Lord of Darkness" doomed to failure and punishment for his wickedness.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1-Invention/> They reimagined Satan as an enemy of God the powerful, but not of the weak and mortal human race. In other words, a figure humans could sympathize with.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1-Invention/> | |||
* The argument that "People need people". Satanism misunderstands independence, while individuals may in fact have much more power and potential than most ever acknowledge or realize, no one is independently a god or independently powerful. One can only attain power if other people give it to you. This is not purely in terms of their usefulness, people need the support and care of others. Babies will die if they receive no loving affection, and so the argument goes, adults are no different. We all depend on others if we are going to be healthy and productive. Making independent claims of divinity, while it may produce a good feeling, engorges one's ego, and has some self-empowering results, leads to a denial of that reality. | |||
As Lévi moved toward political conservatism in later life, he retained the use of the term, but instead applied it to what he believed was a morally neutral facet of "the absolute".{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=107}}{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=37}} | |||
Lévi was not the only occultist who used the term ''Lucifer'' without adopting the term ''Satan'' in a similar way.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=37}} The early ] believed that "Lucifer" was a force that aided humanity's awakening to its own spiritual nature;{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=37–38}} the Society began publishing the ] in 1887.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=38}} | |||
==Non-Satanic Sects== | |||
The first person to promote an explicitly "Satanic" philosophy was the Polish writer ] (1868–1927), a "]" who based his ideology on ] of the 1890s,{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=36}} publishing '']'' in 1897.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.3-Esotericism/> | |||
There are many groups which are commonly misconceived as Satanic. There are two common definitions of a Satanic religion: | |||
Danish occultist ] (1872–1936), who used the pen name Ben Kadosh, listed "Luciferian" as his religious affiliation in answer to the Danish national census (his wife and children were listed as Lutheran),{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=38}} making him among the earliest "self-declared Satanists".<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.3-Esotericism/> | |||
* Any religion that consciously recognizes and worships "Satan," usually referring either to a "dark" deity (similar to the Christian Satan, though usually lacking the evil or unnaturalness associated with it) or a conceptual Satan, often referring to a so-called "true" nature of Mankind. | |||
Hansen sought to spread a cult of Satan/Lucifer,<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.3-Esotericism/> and was involved in a variety of esoteric groups, including ], ], and ], drawing on their ideas to establish his own philosophy.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=38}} He provided a Luciferian interpretation of Freemasonry in a 1906 pamphlet, although his work had little influence outside of Denmark.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=39}}{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=227}} | |||
Throughout his life British occultist ] (1875–1947) was widely described as a Satanist, usually by detractors.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lk8_ARNz-dYC&dq=%22the+first+satanist%22&pg=PA641 |title=The Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religions – Google Books |date= March 2001|isbn=9781615927388 |accessdate=2022-09-14|last1=Lewis |first1=James R. |publisher=Prometheus Books |ref=none}}</ref> Crowley did not consider himself a Satanist, nor did he worship Satan, as he did not accept the Christian world view in which Satan was believed to exist.{{sfnm|1a1=Hutton|1y=1999|1p=175 |2a1=Dyrendal|2y=2012|2pp=369–370}} He nevertheless used imagery considered satanic, for instance, describing himself as "the Beast 666" and referring to the ] in his work, sending "]" to his friends later in life.{{sfn|Hutton|1999|p=175}} Crowley "in many ways embodies the pre-Satanist esoteric discourse on Satan and Satanism through his lifestyle and his philosophy", with his "image and thought" becoming an "important influence" on the later development of religious Satanism.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=39}} Both Crowley and ] "cultivated a sinister public image and sported shaved heads". | |||
* Some religions that do not follow the Christian religion or recognize ] as explained in the Christian creeds. | |||
In 1928, the ] (FS) was established in Germany; its founder, ], published ''Satanische Magie'' ("Satanic Magic") that same year.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=42}} The group connected Satan to ], claiming that the planet related to the Sun in the same manner that Lucifer relates to the human world.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=42}} | |||
The second definition is most commonly used by fundamentalist Christians, and is the source of much disagreement about whether a religion should be considered Satanic or not. The most common targets of these claims are ] religions, such as ] and ]. | |||
], a Russian occultist who had fled to France following the ], established the esoteric group Brotherhood of the Golden Arrow in Paris in 1932.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=18}}{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=43–44}} She promoted a theology centered on what she called the Third Term of the Trinity consisting of Father, Son, and Sex, the last of which she deemed to be most important.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=18}} Her early disciples, who underwent what she called "Satanic Initiations", included models and art students recruited from ] circles.{{sfn|Medway|2001|p=18}} The Golden Arrow disbanded after Naglowska abandoned it in 1936.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=45}} Hers was "a quite complicated Satanism, built on a complex philosophical vision of the world, of which little would survive its initiator".{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=277}} | |||
Occasionally, some Christian denominations or even Judaism and Islam are referred to as Satanic, based on interpretations of the second definition. Among these Christian groups are usually the less traditional ones, such as the ] and other smaller sects. Also, it is not unheard of for ] to refer to ] as Satanic, and vice versa, though this is more uncommon. | |||
Herbert Sloane claims ], a Satanic group based in ], was founded in 1948. Describing his Satanic tradition as the Ophite Cultus Sathanas, the group first came to public attention in 1969.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=49–50}}{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=278}} The group had a Gnostic doctrine about the world, in which the Judeo-Christian creator god is regarded as evil, and the ] is presented as a force for good, who had delivered salvation to humanity in the ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=49–50}}{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=280}} Sloane's claim of a 1940s origin remain unproven: potentially fabricated to make his group appear older than the (1966) establishment of the Church of Satan.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=50}}{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=278}} | |||
Another ] which is wrongly associated with ] is the ] and ] bands. Although there are some music groups that intentionally use Satanic imagery for one reason or another, the vast majority of metal/rock bands have no connection to any sort of Satanic philosophy. | |||
==Contemporary tendencies and groups== | |||
==See also== | |||
"The intentional, religiously motivated veneration of Satan" (the "working definition" of Satanism of historian of religion Ruben van Luijk),{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=2}} comes in different forms. Satanism has been called a "]",{{sfnm|1a1=Dyrendal|1a2=Lewis|1a3=Petersen|1y=2016|1p=3 |2a1=Introvigne|2y=2016|2p=517}} and other times judged too diffuse to merit that description and been called instead a "]" (Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen),{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=4}} united by "]",{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=7}} and the fact that most of them were ]s.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=4}} Some of the resemblances in this Satanic milieu are: | |||
* the positive use of the term ''Satanist'' as a designation, | |||
* an emphasis on individualism, | |||
* a genealogy that connects them to other Satanic groups, | |||
* a transgressive and ] stance, | |||
* a self-perception as an elite, and | |||
* an embrace of values such as pride, self-reliance, and productive non-conformity.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=7–9}} | |||
A minority of Satanists have some type of association with the political far-right.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/countering-radical-right/nazi-satanists-promoting-extreme-violence-and-terrorism/|title=The Nazi Satanists promoting extreme violence and terrorism | openDemocracy}}</ref> | |||
Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen argue that the groups within the Satanic milieu can be divided into three groups: reactive Satanists, rationalist Satanists, and esoteric Satanists.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=5}} | |||
* ] | |||
*'''Reactive Satanism''' (they believe) encompass "popular Satanism, inverted Christianity, and symbolic rebellion" and situates itself in opposition to society while at the same time conforming to society's perspective of evil.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=5}} | |||
* ] | |||
*'''Rationalist Satanism''' is used to describe the trend in the Satanic milieu which is ], ], ]ic, and ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=6}} According to Joseph Laycock, "most contemporary Satanists" are nontheistic.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.1/> | |||
* ] | |||
*'''Esoteric Satanism''' applied to those forms which are ] and draw upon ideas from other forms of ], ], ], and ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=6}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
Diane E. Taub and Lawrence D. Nelson (publishing in 1993, at the end of the "Satanic panic") divide Satanism into two: | |||
==External links== | |||
* '''"Establishment" Satanism''', or the "respectable" form of Satanism that is "usually highly visible and structured",{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=525}} and emphasizes its law-abiding nature. (This may include both Rationalist Satanism and Esoteric Satanism.) An example of "Establishment Satanism" is the ], which "officially condemns illegal activity".{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=528}} (Other Establishment Satanists are the Church of Satanic Brotherhood or the Temple of Set.){{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=535}} It is the variety of Satanism most studied by academic sociologists,{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=523}} who also represent Satanism in their "discourse" as "harmless, law-abiding alternative religions",{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=523}} ignoring the second type of Satanism ... | |||
* '''"Underground" Satanism''', the Satanism of "reputed criminal elements", and the variety that lay groups and the media tend to focus on (especially during the Satanic Panic of the 1980s).{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=536}}{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=523, 525}} (Satanic Underground may be similar to Reactive Satanism.) Information on the underground is often less than reliable, as reports are sensational and the Satanists themselves are secretive.{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=531}}{{sfn|Carlson|Larue|1989}}<ref name="Hicks 1991 a">Hicks, Robert D., 1991. ''In Pursuit of Satan: The Police and the Occult'', Buffalo: Prometheus Book.</ref><ref name="J. Richardson 1991">Richardson, James T., "Satanism in the Courts: From Murder to Heavy Metal." pp. 205–217 in ''The Satanism Scare'', edited by James T. Richardson, Joel Best, and David G. Bromley. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.</ref> Establishment and Underground Satanism conflict, the first wanting to preserve its social acceptance and tax-exempt status that the sensational crimes or alleged crimes of the underground put in jeopardy. How much cause and effect there is a between Underground Satanism and crime comes into question because according to at least one report, "nearly worshipping criminal has had a history of anti-social behavior ... long before taking up occult trappings.")<ref>Carlson, Shawn and Gerald Larue. 1989. ''Satanism in America: How the Devil Got Much More Than His Due''. El Cerrito, CA: Gaia, p.v. Quoted in ...</ref>{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=532}} On the other hand, evidence of personality disorders does not mean the disorder sufferer does not have sincere Satanic beliefs.{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993}}{{sfn|Carlson|Larue|1989}} | |||
Contemporary religious Satanism is predominantly an American phenomenon but has spread elsewhere via globalization and the Internet,{{sfn|Petersen|2009a}} allowing for intra-group communication and creation of a forum for Satanist disputes.{{sfn|Petersen|2009a}} Satanism started to reach ] in the 1990s—in time with the fall of the ]—and most noticeably in ] and ], predominantly Roman Catholic countries.{{sfn|Alisauskiene|2009}}<ref>{{cite news |title =Satanism stalks Poland |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/778438.stm |work= BBC News |date= 5 June 2000}}</ref> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
===Atheistic Satanism=== | |||
{{anchor|Atheistic Satanism}} <!-- Needed for redirect from lead section --> | |||
====Church of Satan and Anton LaVey==== | |||
{| align="center" class="toccolours" style="margin: 1em 2em 1em 2em;" | |||
{{Main|LaVeyan Satanism|Church of Satan}} | |||
], official insignia of the Church of Satan and LaVeyan Satanism]] | |||
Satanism as "a self-declared religion" is said (by most scholars of Satanism), to have "truly" begun in 1966 with the founding of the Church of Satan (CoS) by ]. Religious scholars have called the Church not only the oldest, continuous satanic organization (Joseph Laycock),<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.4/> (]),{{sfn|Lewis|2001|p=5}} (Asprem, Granholm),{{sfn|Asprem|Granholm|2014|p=75}} (Faxneld and Petersen),{{sfn|Faxneld|Petersen|2013|p=81}} but the most influential, with "numerous imitator and breakaway groups" (Laycock),<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.4/> (R. Van Luijk).<ref name=Footnote9>R. van Luijk, Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 305.</ref> | |||
Founded in San Francisco, California, in an era when there was much public interest in the ], ], and Satanism, the church enjoyed a heyday for several years after its founding, when a "gigantic media circus"<ref name="Andrade-Girardian-2020">{{cite journal |last1=Andrade |first1=Gabriel |title=A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives |journal=Irish Theological Quarterly |date=23 December 2020 |volume=86 |issue=1 |pages=50–62 |doi=10.1177/0021140020977656 |s2cid=232040703 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021140020977656 |access-date=12 January 2024}}</ref> developed around "the Father of Satanism" and his Satanic aesthetics—LaVey shaved his head and wore a goatee, performing ]es with nude women serving as altars,<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.4-Magic>]: section 4. The Church of Satan. From the Magic Circle to the Church of Satan</ref> was invited on national talk shows, and mingled with celebrities attending his satanic parties.<ref name="JPLS2023:sect.4-LaVey’s">]: section 4 The Church of Satan. LaVey's Satanism</ref>{{sfn|Petersen|2009|p=}} As an entrepreneur, he saw an opening for a new religion in the spiritual void of a secularizing post-Christian West.<ref name="Andrade-Girardian -2020">{{cite journal |last1=Andrade |first1=Gabriel |title=A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives. Satan according to LaVey |journal=Irish Theological Quarterly |date=23 December 2020 |volume=86 |issue=1 |doi=10.1177/0021140020977656 |s2cid=232040703 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021140020977656 |access-date=19 January 2024}}</ref> | |||
But LaVey also promoted his ideas, and his 1969 '']'' ("the best-known and most influential statement of Satanic theology"{{sfn|Bromley|2005|pp=8127–8128}} sold nearly a million copies.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.4/> These had "very little" connection with "either Satan or the worship of Satan",<ref name="WELTON-Airship-2014">{{cite web |last1=WELTON |first1=BENJAMIN |title=Friedrich Nietzsche and Ayn Rand's Influence on Satanism |url=http://airshipdaily.com/blog/10152014-friedrich-nietzsche-ayn-rand-satanism |website=The Airship |access-date=20 January 2024 |date=15 October 2014 }}</ref> but were based on the ] literary concept of Satan, not as a symbol of evil, but as a rebel anti-hero, defying God’s tyranny with charisma and bravery.<ref name="Andrade-Girardian-LaVey-2020">{{cite journal |last1=Andrade |first1=Gabriel |title=A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives. Satan according to LaVey |journal=Irish Theological Quarterly |date=23 December 2020 |volume=86 |issue=1 |doi=10.1177/0021140020977656 |s2cid=232040703 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021140020977656 |access-date=12 January 2024}}</ref> Together with the romanticism, "humanism, hedonism, aspects of pop psychology and the human potential movement" were woven together by LaVey,<ref name="JPLS2023:sect.4-LaVey's"/> and publicized with "a lot of showmanship".<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.4>]: section 4 The Church of Satan.</ref> Philosopher ], who argued that ]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Rand |first1=Ayn |title=The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism |date=1964 |publisher=New American Library |location=New York}}</ref> ("unfettered self-interest is good and altruism is destructive"),<ref name="Cummins-Rand-PBS-2016">{{cite web |last1=Cummins |first1=Denise |title=Column: This is what happens when you take Ayn Rand seriously |url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/column-this-is-what-happens-when-you-take-ayn-rand-seriously |website=PBS News Hour |access-date=18 January 2024 |date=16 February 2016}}</ref> was a major influence. According to both LaVey{{sfnm|1a1=Lewis|1y=2001a|1p=18 |2a1=Lewis|2y=2002|2p=9}} and sociologist of religion ],{{sfn|Lewis|2002|p=2}} ] was a cornerstone of his philosophy (along with "ceremony and ritual" or "ritual magic"). | |||
Other influences were ] (who celebrated the ], proclaimed "God is dead", and preached against the 'slave's morality' of mercy, charity, and helping the weak);<ref name="WELTON-Airship-2014"/><ref name="Andrade-Girardian-2020-57">{{cite journal |last1=Andrade |first1=Gabriel |title=A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives |journal=Irish Theological Quarterly |date=23 December 2020 |volume=86 |issue=1 |page=57 |doi=10.1177/0021140020977656 |s2cid=232040703 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021140020977656 |access-date=12 January 2024}}</ref> English occultist ] (famous for the axiom "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"); and ] (strongly associated with ] and the expression "the ]").<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.4-Magic/> | |||
LaVey used Christianity as a "negative mirror" for his new faith,{{sfn|Schipper|2010|p=109}} rejecting the basic principles, theology and values of Christian belief,{{sfn|La Fontaine|1999|p=96}} along with other major religions and philosophies such as humanitarianism and ]—which he saw as negative forces. Instead of idealism, humility, abstinence, (self-denigration), obedience, (herd behavior), spirituality, and irrationality;{{sfn|Faxneld|Petersen|2013|p=80}} he praised the ] (], ], ], ], ], ] and ]), as virtues not vices.{{sfnm|1a1=Gardell|1y=2003|1p=288 |2a1=Schipper|2y=2010|2p=107}}<ref>LaVey, Anton |''Satanic Bible'', | |||
–BOOK OF LUCIFER–, chapter III, "Some Evidence of a New Satanic Age"</ref> LaVey went beyond discouraging sexual inhibitions and feelings of guilt and shame over fetishes,{{sfn|Lap|2013|p=91}}{{sfn|Faxneld|Petersen|2014|p=169}} calling for a celebration of, and indulgence in, humanity's animal nature and its desires, which Christianity sought to suppress.{{sfn|La Fontaine|1999|p=96}} Human beings should seek out the carnal rather than the spiritual;{{sfn|Lewis|2001b|p=50}} satisfying the ego's desires enhanced an individual's pride, self-respect, and self-realization.{{sfn|Lap|2013|p=92}} Hate, and aggression were necessary and advantageous for survival,{{sfn|Lap|2013|p=94}} victims should not "turn the other cheek"<ref>] ], the ] in the ]</ref> but take an "eye for an eye".{{sfn|Gardell|2003|p=289}} | |||
Satanists should be individualistic, non-conformist, contemptuous of "colorless" mainstream society.{{sfn|Dyrendal|2013|p=129}} LaVey saw Satanism as something like a personality type as much as a belief, since Satanists "are outsiders by their nature",{{sfn|Dyrendal|2013|p=129}} and "born, not made".{{sfn|Petersen|2009a|p=9}} Since gods are actually a creation of man and not the other way around, LaVey asked, "'Why not really be honest and if you are going to create a god in your image, why not create that god as yourself'.... every man is a god if he chooses to recognize himself as one."<ref>''Satanic Bible'' by LaVey, p.96, quoted in ...</ref>{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=525}} Not everyone would measure up to being a god however. Human social equality was a "myth", leading to "mediocrity" and support of the weak at the expense of the strong.{{sfnm|1a1=Gardell|1y=2003|1p=289 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=366}}{{sfnm|1a1=La Fontaine|1y=1999|1p=97 |2a1=Lap|2y=2013|2p=95 |3a1=van Luijk|3y=2016|3p=367}} "Social stratification" was part of LaVey and the Church's "Five Point Program".{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=366}}<ref name="Pentagonal Revisionism-1988">{{cite web |last1=LaVey |first1=Anton Szandor |title=Pentagonal Revisionism: A Five-Point Program by Anton Szandor LaVey |url=https://www.churchofsatan.com/pentagonal-revisionism/ |website=Church of Satan |access-date=22 January 2024 |date=1988}}</ref> | |||
A "true Satanic society" was described in Lavey's church's periodical ''The Black Flame'' and highlighted by anthropologist ]; it would be one in which the population consists of "free-spirited, well-armed, fully-conscious, self-disciplined individuals, who will neither need nor tolerate any external entity 'protecting' them or telling them what they can and cannot do".{{sfn|La Fontaine|1999|p=97}} Another version of the Satanic society envisioned by LaVey was the breeding of an elite people "superior" in their creativity and nonconformity.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=376}} These would live apart from the rest of the human "herd"—who would be relegated into ghettoes, ideally "space ghettoes" located on other planets.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=375}} | |||
LaVey's ideas were also said to "seem "contradictory" (according to Joseph Laycock).<ref name="JPLS2023:sect.4-LaVey's"/> According to one CoS priest (Gavin Baddeley), LaVey's church combined "a love of life garbed in the symbols of death and fear",<ref>G. Baddeley, ‘’Lucifer Rising’’ (London: Plexus, 1999), p. 67</ref><ref name="JPLS2023:sect.4-LaVey’s"/> and while LaVey himself pontificated on personal freedom, he "micromanaged the lives of his followers".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Andrade |first=Gabriel |title=Anton Lavey's Satanic Philosophy: An Analysis |url=https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=imwjournal |journal=Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies |publication-date=2018 |volume=9 |issue=1 |page=34}}</ref> Some (]) doubted his atheist naturalism.<ref name="Greaves-CoS-v-TST">{{cite web |last1=Greaves |first1=Lucien |title=Church of Satan vs. Satanic Temple |url=https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/church-of-satan-vs-satanic-temple |website=The Satanic Temple |access-date=11 January 2024 |date=c. 2019}}</ref> LaVey insisted the church scoffed at the supernatural, but also told an interviewer he considered "curses and hexes" against enemies a form of human sacrifice "by proxy".{{sfn|Taub|Nelson|1993|p=529}} | |||
Contradictions in his thought have been explained by his wanting it to have as wide appeal as possible,<ref name="JPLS2023:sect.4-LaVey’s"/> balancing (in his words) "nine parts" of "respectability" to "one part" of "outrageousness".<ref name="JPLS2023:sect.4-LaVey’s"/><ref>R. H. Alfred, "The Church of Satan." in J. R. Lewis and J. A. Petersen (eds.), The Encyclopedic Sourcebook of Satanism (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2008), pp. 478–502 (p. 485).</ref> If Satanism was to be Satanic, it required some outrageous/anti-social elements, but if it was going to be a viable organization, these could not be allowed to frighten off potential congregants and attract unwanted attention. | |||
One "outrageous" issue that LaVey was criticized for was his "ambivalent relationship" with far-right groups (], ], and the ]) that he neither endorsed nor rejected.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.4-Rise>]: section 4. The Church of Satan. The Rise and Fall of Anton LaVey</ref><ref name=Footnote-110>"Evil, Anyone?" ''Newsweek'' (16 August 1971), p. 56.</ref> | |||
LaVey died in 1997, but the church maintains a purist approach to his thought,{{sfn|Lewis|2002|p=5}} insisting he and the church have "codified" Satanism as "a religion and philosophy",<ref name="CoS-TST-FS">{{cite web |last1=Ethan |first1=Joel |title=The Satanic Temple Fact Sheet |url=https://www.churchofsatan.com/the-satanic-temple-fact-sheet/ |website=Church of Satan |access-date=11 January 2024}}</ref> and dismisses other Satanist groups (atheistic or otherwise), as reverse-Christians, pseudo-Satanists or Devil worshipers.<ref name=Stop>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2014/11/07/the-church-of-satan-wants-you-to-stop-calling-these-devil-worshipping-alleged-murderers-satanists/|title=The Church of Satan wants you to stop calling these 'devil worshiping' alleged murderers Satanists |date=7 November 2014 |newspaper=The Washington Post |last=Ohlheiser |first=Abby |access-date=2015-11-19}}</ref> | |||
==== The Satanic Temple ==== | |||
{{main|The Satanic Temple}} | |||
] and Salem Art Gallery at ]]] | |||
The Satanic Temple (TST), has been called the "most prominent" satanic organization "in terms of both size and public activity" (as of late 2023).<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.7/> Based in ] and active since 2012,<ref>{{Cite web |last=TST |title=New milestone: over 700,000 members! |url=https://thesatanictemple.com/blogs/news/new-milestone-over-700-000-members |access-date=2023-01-23 |website=TST |language=en}}</ref> it claims 700,000 members worldwide.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Romero |first1=Dennis |title=SatanCon, poking at religion and government, opens this weekend in Boston |url=https://nbcnews.com/news/us-news/satancon-poking-religion-government-opens-weekend-boston-rcna81275 |website=NBC News |date=25 April 2023 |publisher=NBC UNIVERSAL |access-date=25 April 2023}}</ref> Like the older Church of Satan, its congregants do not believe in a supernatural Satan, but if the CoS saw Satanism as a "negative mirror" of Christianity, reversing Christian principles of altruism (helping the downtrodden and community-mindedness), the Christian principles TST wants to reverse are politically conservative activist ones—the elimination of the right to abortion, the teaching of evolution, the separation of church and state, etc. This "left-wing",<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.7/> "socially engaged Satanism",<ref>J. P. Laycock, ''Speak of the Devil: How the Satanic Temple Is Changing the Way We Talk about Religion'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)</ref> involves activism,<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.7>]: 7 Contemporary Developments in Satanism</ref> rather than the individualism and right-wing-oriented,{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=326}} "getting what you want for yourself",<ref name=CoSPoP/> of the CoS.{{#tag:ref|"The Church of Satan's Policy on Politics"<ref name=CoSPoP/> is that the Church has no "'official' political position". "Politics are up to each individual member", and those members embrace all sorts of different ideologies (it then lists every conceivable ideology including Communism and Socialism), but most members will "support political candidates and movements whose goals reflect their own practical needs and desires".<ref name=CoSPoP/> It also describes "the emotional drive to 'change the world'" as a "common stage of early adult development typically beginning around age 16 and lasting until around age 24".<ref name=CoSPoP>{{cite web |title=The Church of Satan's Policy on Politics| | |||
url=https://www.churchofsatan.com/policy-on-politics/ |website=Church of Satan|access-date=7 January 2023}}</ref> | |||
Elsewhere however, Church writings argue for things not at all consistent with any leftward or even centrist politics. According to Ruben van Luijk and Amina Lap, LaVey thought eugenics could and should be part of the human future, leading to the breeding of an elite reflecting LaVey's "Satanic" principles,{{sfnm|1a1=Lap|1y=2013|1p=95 |2a1=van Luijk|2y=2016|2p=376}} who would come to power, and then hopefully relegate the rest of the human "herd" into ghettoes, ideally "space ghettoes" located on other planets.{{sfn|van Luijk|2016|p=375}} | |||
|group=Note}} | |||
They have been called "rationalist, political pranksters" (by Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen),{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=219}} with pranks designed to highlight religious hypocrisy and advance the cause of ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=220}} One such prank was performing a "Pink Mass" over the grave of the mother of the evangelical Christian and prominent anti-LGBT preacher ] and claiming that the mass converted the spirit of Phelps' mother into a lesbian.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=219}} The "Seven Fundamental" tenets of the temple on its website mention compassion, justice, freedom, inviolability of the human body, conforming to scientific understanding, human fallibility—but say nothing about Satan.<ref name="TST">{{cite web |title=There are Seven FUNDAMENTAL TENETS |url=https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/about-us |website=THE SATANIC TEMPLE |access-date=5 January 2024}}</ref><ref name=JPLS2023:sect.7-temple>]: 7. Contemporary Developments in Satanism. The Satanic Temple.</ref><ref name="Oppenheimer">{{Cite news |last=Oppenheimer |first=Mark |date=10 July 2015 |title=A Mischievous Thorn in the Side of Conservative Christianity |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/11/us/a-mischievious-thorn-in-the-side-of-conservative-christianity.html |access-date=2015-07-11 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> The Temple has been described as using the ] as metaphor to promote pragmatic skepticism, rational reciprocity, personal autonomy, and curiosity;<ref name="Oppenheimer"/> and as a symbol to represent "the eternal rebel" against arbitrary authority and social norms.<ref name=":2">{{Cite news |title=FAQ |language=en-US |newspaper=TST |url=http://thesatanictemple.com/faq |access-date=2015-12-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=What does Satan mean to the Satanic Temple? – CNN |publisher=CNN |url=http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/11/30/satanic-temple-lisa-ling-orig.cnn |access-date=2015-12-02}}</ref> | |||
The temple has also demanded the privileges the government affords Christians, such as giving prayers before city council meetings, erecting (satanic) statues on government property, distributing it is materials in public schools. As the movement became bigger, its congregations volunteered to clean highways and help the homeless, at least in part to demonstrate they were civic minded and not evil.<ref>{{cite web |author=Massoud Hayoun |date=8 December 2013 |title=Group aims to put 'Satanist' monument near Oklahoma capitol | Al Jazeera America |url=http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/12/8/satanists-aim-tobuildamonumentonthebiblebelt.html |access-date=2014-03-25 |publisher=Al Jazeera}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=9 December 2013 |title=Satanists petition to build monument on Oklahoma state capitol grounds | Washington Times Communities |url=http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/world-our-backyard/2013/dec/9/satanists-petition-build-monument-oklahoma-state-c/ |access-date=2014-03-25 |work=The Washington Times}}</ref> It has made efforts at ],<ref name="greaves">{{cite web |last=Bugbee |first=Shane |date=30 July 2013 |title=Unmasking Lucien Greaves, Leader of the Satanic Temple | VICE United States |url=https://www.vice.com/read/unmasking-lucien-greaves-aka-doug-mesner-leader-of-the-satanic-temple |access-date=2014-03-25 |publisher=Vice.com}}</ref> with a focus on the separation of church and state and using satire against ] that it believes interfere with personal freedom.<ref name="greaves" /> | |||
] has described the Temple as being a progressive and updated version of ],{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=220}} posted a fairly detailed refutation of LaVey's doctrines,<ref name="Greaves-CoS-v-TST"/> accusing the Church of fetishizing authoritarianism,<ref name="greaves"/><ref name="AfterSchoolSatan">{{cite web |title=FAQ |url=https://afterschoolsatan.com/educatin-with-satan/faq/ |website=After School Satan |access-date=29 November 2018 |archive-date=16 January 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170116170111/https://afterschoolsatan.com/educatin-with-satan/faq/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> and explaining how elements of ] and ] within LaVeyan Satanism are incongruent with ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite AV media |url=https://davidpakman.com/interviews/douglas-mesner/ |title=Satanic Temple Founder Talks Atheistic Religion |work=] |date=9 October 2014 |access-date=29 November 2018}}</ref> The Church of Satan, on the other hand, has declared the TST members as only "masquerading" as Satanists,<ref name="COS1">{{cite news |title=Third Side Intelligence: Missouri Abortions |website=Church of Satan|url=https://www.churchofsatan.com/third-side-intelligence-missouri-abortions-the/ |date=10 October 2017 |access-date=29 November 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/satans-lawyers-try-christian-right-tactics-to-erect-winged-goat|title=Satanists Go to Court Seeking Right to Pray at City Meetings|website=Bloomberg Law|last1=Larson|first1=Erik|date=22 March 2021|accessdate=28 March 2021}}</ref> being in violation of the "five decades of a clearly defined belief system called Satanism expounded by a worldwide organization" (i.e. ]).<ref name="CoS-TST-FS"/> | |||
==== First Satanic Church ==== | |||
{{Main|First Satanic Church}} | |||
After LaVey's death in 1997, the Church of Satan was taken over by a new administration and its headquarters were moved to New York City. LaVey's daughter, the High Priestess ] re-founded The First Satanic Church on 1999 in San Francisco. This church has been called "a lot more exclusive" than the original and as of late 2023 was known for producing a "Black X-Mass concert" in San Francisco "every year for the last couple decades".<ref name="Font-2023">{{cite news |last1=Font |first1=Amanda |title=How the Church of Satan Was Born in San Francisco |url=https://www.kqed.org/news/11964949/how-the-church-of-satan-was-born-in-san-francisco |access-date=5 January 2024 |work=KQED |date=20 October 2023}}</ref> | |||
=== Theistic Satanism === | |||
] (also known as traditional Satanism, spiritual Satanism or ] worship) is a form of Satanism with the primary belief that Satan is an actual ] or force to revere or worship.<ref name="Satanism-Introduction"/><ref name=autogenerated6>{{cite book |last=Partridge |first=Christopher |author-link=Christopher Partridge |year=2004 |title=The Re-Enchantment of the West: Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occulture |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g05THJPH5xUC&pg=PA82 |volume=1 |publisher=] |location=London |page=82 |isbn=0-567-08269-5}}</ref> Other characteristics of theistic Satanism may include a belief in ], which is manipulated through ], although that is not a defining criterion, and theistic Satanists may focus solely on devotion. | |||
==== Temple of Set ==== | |||
{{Main|Temple of Set}} | |||
The Temple of Set (TOS) is an ] ] ] religious organization. It was founded in 1975 when Michael Aquino, the founder of a Church of Satan "Grotto" in Louisville, Kentucky, and editor of the Church's newsletter, ''The Cloven Hoof'', left the church, taking 28 members with him.<ref>{{cite book |title= Church of Satan |url= http://www.xeper.org/maquino/nm/COS.pdf |last= Aquino |first= Michael |year= 2002 |publisher= Temple of Set |location= San Francisco |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070712000522/http://www.xeper.org/maquino/nm/COS.pdf |archive-date= 12 July 2007 }}</ref><ref>Boulware, "A Devil of a Time"; Lyons, Satan Wants You, p. 126.</ref> Aquino's anger that LaVey had devalued his high level grade of "magister" in the church may have initiated his break, but Aquino also disagreed with LaVey's materialist philosophy, arguing that while the church might publicly be materialist, Satan as symbol was "only part of the truth". Aquino held a ritual to ask Satan "where to lead" his CoS defectors and, on the night of 21–22 June 1975, Satan allegedly told him to "Reconsecrate my Temple and my Order in the true name of Set. No longer will I accept the bastard title of a Hebrew fiend." Thus Aquino came to believe that the name ''Satan'' was a corruption of the name ''Set'', the Egyptian god of darkness.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-ToS>]: 5 The Temple of Set and Esoteric Satanism.The Temple of Set</ref>{{sfn|Gardell|2003|p=390}} The philosophy of the Temple of Set may be summed up as "enlightened individualism"—enhancement and improvement of oneself by personal education, experiment, and initiation. This process is necessarily different and distinctive for each individual. The members do not agree on whether Set is real or symbolic, and they're not expected to.{{sfn|Harvey|2009}} | |||
The Temple teaches that Set is a real entity,{{sfnm|1a1=Petersen|1y=2005|1p=436 |2a1=Harvey|2y=2009|2p=32}} and the only real god in existence, with all other gods being created by the human imagination.{{sfnm|1a1=Granholm|1y=2009|1pp=93–94 |2a1=Granholm|2y=2013|2p=218}} Set is described as having given humanity—through the means of non-natural ]—the "Black Flame" or the "Gift of Set", which is a questioning intellect that sets humans apart from other animals.{{sfnm|1a1=La Fontaine|1y=1999|1p=102 |2a1=Gardell|2y=2003|2p=291 |3a1=Petersen|3y=2005|3p=436}} While Setians are expected to revere Set, they do not worship him.{{sfn|Granholm|2009|p=94}} Central to Setian philosophy is the human individual,{{sfn|Schipper|2010|p=109}} with ] presented as the ultimate goal.{{sfn|Faxneld|Petersen|2013a|p=7}} | |||
Estimates of the Temple's total are between 300 and 500 as of 2005 (Petersen);{{sfn|Petersen|2005|p=435}} and approximately 200 as of 2007 (Granholm).{{sfnm|1a1=Granholm|1y=2009|1p=93 |2a1=Granholm|2y=2013|2p=223}} Members must remain active. New members have one year to join a pylon (a Local chapter) and must reach the second degree of adept by showing proficiency in magic within two years, or have their memberships revoked.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-ToS/> | |||
Aquino died in July 2020 at the age of 73. High priests after Aquino were Don Webb starting in 1996, Zeena Schreck starting in 2002 (who lasted only six weeks when Aquino took over again), Patricia Hardy starting in 2004.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-ToS/> | |||
==== The "sinister tradition" and the Order of Nine Angles ==== | |||
{{Main|Order of Nine Angles}} | |||
] | |||
During the 1990s, the idea that groups like Church of Satan and Temple of Set were "too benevolent and law-abiding" to be true Satanists grew, particularly among musicians and fans in extreme heavy metal music, where being more extreme meant being more authentic.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-Amoral-O9A>]: 5 The Temple of Set and Esoteric Satanism.Amoral Groups and the Order of Nine Angles</ref> These antinomian and amoral Satanic (or post-Satanic) groups are sometimes called the "sinister tradition" of Satanism.<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-Amoral-O9A/> | |||
The Order of Nine Angles has been called "the ur-type that defines the sinister tradition"<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-Amoral-O9A/> and is connected to multiple killings, rapes, and cases of child abuse and ].<ref name=NS-4-3-2020/> | |||
According to the group's own claims, the Order of Nine Angles (O9A or ONA) was established in ], England, during the late 1960s, when a Grand Mistress united a number of ancient pagan groups active in the area.{{sfnm|1a1=Goodrick-Clarke|1y=2003|1p=218 |2a1=Senholt|2y=2013|2p=256}} This account states that when the Order's Grand Mistress migrated to Australia, a man known as "Anton Long" took over as the new Grand Master.{{sfnm|1a1=Goodrick-Clarke|1y=2003|1p=218|2a1=Senholt|2y=2013|2p=256}} From 1976 onward, he authored an array of texts for the tradition, codifying and extending its teachings, mythos, and structure.{{sfnm|1a1=Goodrick-Clarke|1y=2003|1p=218 |2a1=Senholt|2y=2013|2p=256 |3a1=Monette|3y=2013|3p=87}} Various academics have argued that Long is the pseudonym of ] activist ],{{sfnm|1a1=Goodrick-Clarke|1y=2003|1p=216 |2a1=Senholt|2y=2013|2p=268 |3a1=Faxneld|3y=2013|3p=207}} (Myatt denies it but Religion scholar Jacob Senholt "copies of ONA documents from 1978 with Myatt’s name on them" have been found and "early ONA texts were published" by a press that "Myatt owned").<ref>Senholt, "The Sinister Tradition," pp. 47–8</ref>{{sfnm|1a1=Ryan|1y=2003|1p=53 |2a1=Senholt|2y=2013|2p=267}} The O9A arose to public attention in the early 1980s,{{sfn|Gardell|2003|p=293}} spreading its message through magazine articles over the following two decades.{{sfn|Senholt|2013|p=256}} In 2000, it established a presence on the internet,{{sfn|Senholt|2013|p=256}} later adopting social media to promote its message.{{sfn|Monette|2013|p=107}} | |||
O9A consists largely of secretive,{{sfn|Kaplan|2000|p=236}} autonomous ] known as "nexions",{{sfn|Monette|2013|p=88}} operating as a network of allied Satanic practitioners, which it terms the "kollective".{{sfn|Monette|2013|p=88}} The majority of these are located in Britain, Ireland, and Germany, although others are located elsewhere in Europe, and in Russia, Egypt, South Africa, Brazil, Australia, and the United States. In recent decades up to 2023, O9A has caught the attention of "white supremacist groups and troubled young men" through its material online, and as of 2013 2,000 people "may be associated with the ONA in one form or another", according to one estimate.<ref name=ftnt>Monette, Mysticism in the 21st Century, p. 89.</ref><ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-Amoral-O9A/> | |||
The O9A describe their occultism as "Traditional Satanism".{{sfnm|1a1=Faxneld|1y=2013|1p=207 |2a1=Faxneld|2y=2014|2p=88 |3a1=Senholt|3y=2013|3p=250 |4a1=Sieg|4y=2013|4p=252}} The O9A's writings not only encourage human sacrifice,{{sfnm|1a1=Goodrick-Clarke|1y=2003|1pp=218–219 |2a1=Baddeley|2y=2010|2p=155}} but insist it is required in Satanism,<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-Amoral-O9A/> referring to their victims as ''opfers''.{{sfn|Goodrick-Clarke|2003|p=219}} According to the Order's teachings, such opfers must demonstrate character faults that mark them out as being worthy of death.{{sfnm|1a1=Kaplan|1y=2000|1p=237 |2a1=Ryan|2y=2003|2p=54}}{{sfnm|1a1=Harvey|1y=1995|1p=292 |2a1=Kaplan|2y=2000|2p=237}} No O9A cell has admitted to carrying out a sacrifice in a ritualized manner, but rather, Order members have joined the police and military to carry out such killings.{{sfn|Monette|2013|p=114}} Faxneld described the Order as "a dangerous and extreme form of Satanism",{{sfn|Faxneld|2013|p=207}} while religious studies scholar ] wrote that the O9A fit the stereotype of the Satanist "better than other groups" by embracing "deeply shocking" and illegal acts.{{sfn|Harvey|1995|p=292}} Several British politicians, including the ]'s ], chair of the ],<ref name=NS-4-3-2020>{{cite news |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2020/03/nazi-satanist-cult-fuelling-far-right-terrorist-groups-overlooked-uk-authorities-order-nine-angles |title=A Nazi-satanist cult is fuelling far-right groups |magazine=New Statesman |date=4 March 2020 |access-date=5 January 2023}}</ref> have pushed for the group to be banned as a terror organization, and according to the ], "the authorities are concerned by the number of paedophiles associated with the ONA." Additionally, there are various followers of the O9A paradigm who are (or were) also members of banned militant national-socialist groups, namely the ], ], and ], the first of which even openly aims to perpetrate terror attacks.<ref name=terrorism> | |||
* {{cite web | date=9 March 2020 | url=https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/state-of-hate-2020-final.pdf | title=State of Hate 2020 | quote=Over the last 12 months four nazis convicted of terrorist offences have been linked to O9A, and there are two more cases pending. | publisher=]}} | |||
* {{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-53141759 | title=Order of Nine Angles: What is this obscure Nazi Satanist group? | work=] | quote=The Sonnenkrieg Division, with its glorification of sexual violence, highlights another disturbing theme relating to the ONA – sexual offending as a way of undermining social norms....The authorities are concerned by the number of paedophiles associated with the ONA, taking the group into a different area of law enforcement activity. | date=29 June 2020}} | |||
* {{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-49773773 | title=High Wycombe neo-Nazi Jacek Tchorzewski jailed for terror offences | work=] | date=20 September 2019 | quote=The satanist text demonstrated a "marked fixation with blood, the sexualisation of violence, a paedophilic projection of adult sexuality onto children, and with achieving National Socialist political goals through political violence and acts of terrorism".}} | |||
* {{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51682760 | title=UK Nazi Satanist group should be outlawed, campaigners urge | work=] | date=16 July 2020 | quote=ONA's Nazi-Satanist ideology, a supernatural worldview that encourages the disruption of society through violence, criminality and sexual offending.}} | |||
</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.counterextremism.com/supremacy/order-nine-angles | title=Order of Nine Angles | quote=One piece of propaganda the group produced is called The Rape Anthology, a collection of ONA writings praising Hitler, Satan, and rape, while employing Islamic terminology and demonizing Jews and minorities. Some of the essays suggest that rape is necessary for the ascension of the Ubermensch. | publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7qvny/random-murder-of-muslim-man-linked-to-neo-nazi-death-cult-report | title='Random' Murder of Muslim Man Linked to 'Neo-Nazi Death Cult': Report | date=30 September 2020}}</ref> | |||
==== Joy of Satan ==== | |||
{{Main|Joy of Satan Ministries}} | |||
] | |||
Joy of Satan is a ] ] organization that combines Satanism, the ], and ].<ref name=JPLS2023:sect.5-Other>]: 5 The Temple of Set and Esoteric Satanism. Other Esoteric Groups</ref> It was founded in the early 2000s by Maxine Dietrich (pseudonym of Andrea Maxine Dietrich),{{sfn|Asprem|Granholm|2014|pp=144–146}}<ref name=":4">{{cite web|last=Petersen|first=Jesper|date= 27–29 August 2012 |url=https://contern.org/cyberproceedings/papers-from-the-1st-international-conference-on-contemporary-esotericism/jesper-aa-petersen-bracketing-beelzebub-satanism-studies-andas-boundary-work/|access-date=25 January 2021|title=Bracketing Beelzebub: Satanism studies and/as boundary work|website=ContERN}}</ref> wife of the ]'s co-founder and former leader Clifford Herrington.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=370–371}} With its inception, spiritual Satanism was born—a current that until recently was regarded only as "theist", but then defined into "Spiritual Satanism" by theistic Satanists who concluded that the term ''spiritual'' in Satanism represented the best answer to the world,<ref name=":5" /> considering it a "moral slap" toward the earlier carnal and materialistic LaVeyan Satanism, and instead focusing its attention upon ].<ref name=":5" /> Joy of Satan presents a unique synthesis of theistic Satanism, ], ], ], ], ], and extraterrestrial hypotheses similar to those popularized by ] and ].<ref name=":4"/> | |||
Members of Joy of Satan are generally ], believing that Satan is one of many ].<ref name=":03">{{Cite book|last=McBride|first=Jaemes|title=The Divine Province: Birthing New Earth |publisher=Ed Rychkun|year=2013|isbn=978-1927066034|location=|page=84}}</ref><ref name=":22">{{Cite news|last=ATLANTA|first=J.F.|date=9 January 2014|title=What do Satanists believe?|url=https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2014/01/09/what-do-satanists-believe|access-date=25 January 2021|newspaper=The Economist}}</ref> While Satan and demons are considered deities within JoS, the deities themselves are understood to be highly evolved, un-aging, sentient, and powerful humanoid extraterrestrial beings.<ref name=":03"/>{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=370–371}}{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=144–232}}<ref>{{Cite news |last=Paniccia|first=Enrico |date=17 January 2021|title=The dark side of Christianity|work=Consul Press |url=https://www.consulpress.eu/il-lato-oscuro-del-cristianesimo/|access-date=25 January 2021}}</ref> Satan and many demons are equated with gods from ancient cultures, some of which include the ] god ], and the ] angel ] being seen as Satan, borrowing their theistic Satanist interpretations of Enki from the writings of ], and Melek Taus partially deriving from the writings of Anton LaVey.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=370–371}} Satan is seen not only as an important deity but a powerful and sentient being responsible for the creation of humanity.<ref name=":03" />{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=370–371}} Satan is also revered by JoS as "the true father and creator God of humanity",<ref name=":22" /> the bringer of knowledge, and whose desire is for his creations, humans, to elevate themselves through knowledge and understanding.<ref name=":03" /><ref name=":22" /> | |||
In their beliefs, ] (a pre-Islamic religion of about one million members found mainly in northern ], that holds that Melek Taûs/''Tawûsî Melek'', "the Peacock Angel", is the leader of the archangels and functions as the ruler of the world; but who Muslims believe is a fallen angel), is in juxtaposition with Satanism as they consider the two share similar elements, such as Yazidi devotees being defined by Muslims as "devotees to ]" and regarded as Satanists.<ref name=":5">{{cite web|last=Twilight|first=Jennifer|date=25 January 2021|title=Analysis on the Joy of Satan|url=https://www.unionesatanistiitaliani.it/index.php/analisi-del-progetto-joy-of-satan|access-date=25 January 2021 |website=Italian Satanist Union}}</ref> It is also believed that the figure of Melek Taus, the peacock angel, may derive from much older pagan deities, such as ], the Hindu goddess of wisdom who rides a peacock, or even the god ], who transforms into a peacock.<ref name=":5" /> The story of Melek Taus itself is also considered by JoS to have many satanic elements, such as being described as the angel who rebelled against the Abrahamic god.<ref name=":5"/> The sacred text of the Yazidis, the ], is claimed by the JoS as the word of Satan.<ref name=":5"/> | |||
While maintaining some popularity as a theistic Satanist sect, the group has been widely criticized for its association with the National Socialist Movement and its racial ], ], and ] sentiment, as well as its ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=144–232}}<ref>{{cite web|date=27 September 2019|title=Satanism|url=https://www.history.com/topics/1960s/satanism|access-date=25 January 2021|website=HISTORY}}</ref> Much of their beliefs on aliens, meditation, and telepathic contacts with demons have become popular in a larger milieu within the currents of recent non-LaVeyan theistic Satanism.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=370–371}} According to Petersen's survey (2014), Joy of Satan's angelfire network has a surprising prominence among theistic Satanist websites on the internet.<ref name=":7">{{Cite book|last=Petersen|first=Jesper|title=Between Darwin and the Devil: Modern Satanism as Discourse, Milieu, and Self|publisher=NTNU-trykk|year=2011|isbn=978-82-471-3052-0|location= |pages=218–219, 144–146}}</ref> In addition, James R. Lewis's "Satan census" (2009) also revealed a presence of respondents to Joy of Satan.<ref>{{Cite thesis|last=Holt|first=Cimminnee|date=August 2012|title=Satanists and Scholars: A Historiographic Overview and Critique of Scholarship on Religious Satanism|pages=87|url= https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/974626/6/Holt.MA.Thesis.Final.pdfa.pdf|via=Spectrum Library}}</ref> | |||
==== Luciferianism ==== | |||
{{Main|Luciferianism}} | |||
] | |||
Luciferians reportedly revere ] not as the devil, but as a destroyer, guardian, liberator,<ref name="Spence, L. 1993">{{cite book |title=An Encyclopedia of Occultism |author=Spence, L. |publisher=Carol Publishing |date=1993}}</ref> light bringer, and/or guiding spirit to darkness,<ref>{{cite book |title=Vampires in Their Own Words: An Anthology of Vampire Voices |author=Michelle Belanger |author-link=Michelle Belanger |publisher=] |date=2007 |page=175 |isbn=978-0-7387-1220-8}}</ref> or even as the true god, as opposed to ].<ref name="Spence, L. 1993"/> The Greater Church of Lucifer of Houston lost its place of worship in 2017 after vandalism and death threats to its landlord caused him to refuse to renew the church's lease.<ref name="Blakinger-2017">{{cite news |last1=Blakinger |first1=Keri |title=LIFESTYLE // HOUSTON BELIEF. Exorcised: Luciferian church looks to start anew after harassment |url=https://www.houstonchronicle.com/lifestyle/houston-belief/article/Exorcised-Luciferian-church-looks-to-start-anew-11093429.php |access-date=5 January 2024 |work=Houston Chronicle |date=23 April 2017}}</ref> | |||
== Personal Satanism == | |||
In contrast to the organized and doctrinal Satanist groups is the personal Satanism of individuals, who identify as Satanists due to their affinity for the general idea of Satan, including such characteristics as viciousness and/or subversion. | |||
Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen used the term ''reactive Satanism'' to describe one form of modern Satanism. They described this as an adolescent and ] means of rebelling in a Christian society, by which an individual transgresses cultural boundaries.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=5}} which tends to fall into two tendencies: | |||
*"Satanic tourism"—characterized by the brief period of time in which an individual was involved; | |||
*"Satanic quest"—typified by a longer and deeper involvement.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=6}} | |||
The researcher Gareth Medway noted that in 1995 he encountered a British woman who stated that she had been a practicing Satanist during her teenage years. She had grown up in a small mining village and had come to believe that she had ] powers. After hearing about Satanism in some library books, she declared herself a Satanist and formulated a belief that Satan was the true god. After her teenage years she abandoned Satanism and became a ]kian.{{sfn|Medway|2001|pp=362–365}} | |||
Some personal Satanists are teenagers or mentally disturbed individuals who have engaged in criminal activities.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=130}} During the 1980s and 1990s, several groups of teenagers were apprehended after sacrificing animals and vandalizing both churches and graveyards with Satanic imagery.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=445}} Introvigne stated that these incidents were "more a product of juvenile deviance and marginalization than Satanism".{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=445}} In a few cases, the crimes of these personal Satanists have included murder. | |||
*In 1970, two separate groups of teenagers—one led by Stanley Baker in ], and the other by Steven Hurd in Los Angeles, killed a total of three people and consumed parts of their corpses in what they later claimed were sacrifices devoted to Satan.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=446}} | |||
*The American serial killer ] claimed that he was a (theistic) Satanist; during his 1980s killing spree he left an inverted pentagram at the scene of each murder and at his trial called out "Hail Satan!".{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=122}} | |||
*In 1984 on Long Island, a group allegedly called the Knights of the Black Circle killed one of its own members, Gary Lauwers, over a disagreement regarding the group's illegal drug dealing; group members later related that Lauwers' death was a sacrifice to Satan.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=446}} In particular, self-declared Satanist and alleged member of the Knights of the Black Circle, ], became notorious for torturing and murdering Lauwers while attempting to force Lauwers to declare "I love Satan" during the murder.<ref name="kasso">{{cite news |last1=Breskin |first1=David |title=Cult Killing: Kids in the Dark |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/long-island-devil-cult-murder-ricky-kasso-david-breskin-901069/ |publisher=Rolling Stone |date=22 November 1984}}</ref> | |||
*Nikolai Ogolobyak, who confessed to being a member of a Satanic cult, was sentenced to 20 years in 2010 for the ritual killing of four teenagers in Russia's Yaroslavl region.<ref>{{cite news |title=Russian Satanist Jailed for Ritual Murders Released After Fighting in Ukraine |url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/11/21/russian-satanist-jailed-for-ritual-murders-released-after-fighting-in-ukraine-a83172 |work=] |date=21 November 2023}}</ref> | |||
==Demographics== | |||
A survey in the Encyclopedia of Satanism found that people became involved with Satanism in many diverse ways and were found in many countries. The survey found that more Satanists were raised as Protestant Christians than Catholic.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SEPuBgAAQBAJ&dq=encyclopedia+satanism+raised+protestant&pg=PA328 |title=Encyclopedia of Satanism |isbn=9781312360211 |last1=Lewis |first1=James|publisher=Lulu.com }}</ref> | |||
{{Quote box|width=21em|align=right|quote=Beginning in the late 1960s, organized Satanism emerged out of the ] ] with the formation of the ]. It was not long, however, before Satanism had expanded well beyond the Church of Satan. The decentralization of the Satanist movement was considerably accelerated when ] disbanded the grotto system in the mid-1970s. At present, religious Satanism exists primarily as a decentralized subculture Unlike traditional religions, and even unlike the early Satanist bodies such as the Church of Satan and the ], contemporary Satanism is, for the most part, a decentralized movement. In the past, this movement has been propagated through the medium of certain popular books, especially LaVey's '']''. In more recent years, the internet has come to play a significant role in reaching potential "converts", particularly among disaffected young people. |source=— Religion scholar and researcher of new religious movements ]<ref name="Lewis 2001b">{{cite journal |last=Lewis |first=James R. |author-link=James R. Lewis (scholar) |date=August 2001b |title=Who Serves Satan? A Demographic and Ideological Profile |url=https://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/ep/0004/article/view/3748/3565 |journal=] |publisher=] |volume=6 |issue=2 |pages=1–25 |doi=10.17192/mjr.2001.6.3748 |issn=1612-2941 |access-date=30 December 2020}}</ref> }} | |||
Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen observed that from surveys of Satanists conducted in the early 21st century, it was clear that the Satanic milieu was "heavily dominated by young males".{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=138}} They nevertheless noted that census data from New Zealand suggested that there may be a growing proportion of women becoming Satanists.{{update inline|date=May 2024}}{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=138}} In comprising more men than women, Satanism differs from most other religious communities, including most new religious communities.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=158}} Most Satanists came to their religion through reading, either online or books, rather than through being introduced to it through personal contacts.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=146}} Many practitioners do not claim that they converted to Satanism, but rather state that they were born that way, and only later in life confirmed that Satanism served as an appropriate label for their pre-existing worldviews.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=142}} Others have stated that they had experiences with ] phenomena that led them to embracing Satanism.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=143}} | |||
The surveys revealed that atheistic Satanists appeared to be in the majority, although the numbers of theistic Satanists appeared to grow over time.<ref name="Lewis 2001b"/>{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=179–180}}{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pages=525–527}} Beliefs in the afterlife varied, although the most common beliefs about the afterlife were ] and the idea that consciousness survives bodily death.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=181–182}} The surveys also demonstrated that most recorded Satanists practiced ],{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=183}} although there were differing opinions as to whether magical acts operated according to etheric laws or whether the effect of magic was purely psychological.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=209}} A number of Satanists described performing ], in most cases as a form of vigilante justice.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=210–212}} Most practitioners conduct their religious observances in a solitary manner, and never or rarely meet fellow Satanists for rituals.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|pp=151, 153}} Rather, the primary interaction that takes place between Satanists is online, on websites or via email.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=153}} From their survey data, Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen noted that the average length of involvement in the Satanic milieu was seven years.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=157}} A Satanist's involvement in the movement tends to peak in their early twenties and drops off sharply in their thirties.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=159}} A small proportion retain their allegiance to the religion into their elder years.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=160}} When asked about their ideology, the largest proportion of Satanists identified as apolitical or non-aligned, while only a small percentage identified as conservative.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=171}} A small minority of Satanists expressed support for ]; conversely, over two-thirds expressed opposition or strong opposition to it.{{sfn|Dyrendal|Lewis|Petersen|2016|p=143}} | |||
=== 2021 Canadian census === | |||
The ] states that 5,890 Canadians identify as Satanist, representing 0.02% of the population.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Government of Canada |first=Statistics Canada |date=26 October 2022 |title=Religion by visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts |url=https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=9810034201 |access-date=2022-12-31 |website=www150.statcan.gc.ca}}</ref> | |||
Compared to the general population, Satanists are more likely to be male, aged in their 20s or 30s, and not a member of any recognized minority group, although the Japanese are an exception (with the Japanese comprising 0.3% of both Satanists and the population as a whole). | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+Comparison of Satanists in Canada against the general population<ref name=":0" /> | |||
! colspan="2" | | |||
!General population | |||
!Satanists | |||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" |Total population | |||
!align="center" bgcolor=#ccccff|<big>Forms of ]</big> | |||
|36,328,480 | |||
|align="right" width=10 bgcolor=#ccccff |<small></small> | |||
|5,890 | |||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="2" |Gender | |||
|align="center" colspan="2"| ] | ] | ] | |||
!Male | |||
|17,937,165 (49.4%) | |||
|3,430 (58.2%) | |||
|- | |- | ||
!Female | |||
|18,391,315 (50.6%) | |||
|2,460 (41.8%) | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="8" |Age | |||
!0 to 14 | |||
|5,992,555 (16.5%) | |||
|175 (3%) | |||
|- | |||
!15 to 19 | |||
|2,003,200 (5.5%) | |||
|210 (3.6%) | |||
|- | |||
!20 to 24 | |||
|2,177,860 (6%) | |||
|810 (13.8%) | |||
|- | |||
!25 to 34 | |||
|4,898,625 (13.5%) | |||
|2,755 (46.8%) | |||
|- | |||
!35 to 44 | |||
|4,872,425 (13.4%) | |||
|1,250 (21.2%) | |||
|- | |||
!45 to 54 | |||
|4,634,850 (12.8%) | |||
|470 (8%) | |||
|- | |||
!55 to 64 | |||
|5,162,365 (14.2%) | |||
|165 (2.8%) | |||
|- | |||
!65 and over | |||
|6,586,600 (18.1%) | |||
|60 (1%) | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="13" |Minority status | |||
!Non-minority | |||
|26,689,275 (73.5%) | |||
|5,480 (93%) | |||
|- | |||
!South Asian | |||
|2,571,400 (7%) | |||
|40 (0.7%) | |||
|- | |||
!Chinese | |||
|1,715,770 (4.7%) | |||
|50 (0.9%) | |||
|- | |||
!Black | |||
|1,547,870 (4.3%) | |||
|100 (1.7%) | |||
|- | |||
!Filipino | |||
|957,355 (2.6%) | |||
|35 (0.6%) | |||
|- | |||
!Arab | |||
|694,015 (1.9%) | |||
|25 (0.4%) | |||
|- | |||
!Latin American | |||
|580,235 (1.6%) | |||
|55 (0.9%) | |||
|- | |||
!Southeast Asian | |||
|390,340 (1.1%) | |||
|20 (0.3%) | |||
|- | |||
!West Asian | |||
|360,495 (1%) | |||
|0 (0%) | |||
|- | |||
!Korean | |||
|218,140 (0.6%) | |||
|0 (0%) | |||
|- | |||
!Japanese | |||
|98,890 (0.3%) | |||
|15 (0.3%) | |||
|- | |||
!Visible minority, n.i.e. | |||
|172,885 (0.5%) | |||
|20 (0.3%) | |||
|- | |||
!Multiple visible minorities | |||
|331,805 (0.9%) | |||
|50 (0.8%) | |||
|} | |} | ||
==Legal recognition== | |||
] | |||
] | |||
In 2004, it was claimed that Satanism was allowed in the ] of the ], despite opposition from Christians.<ref> ]</ref><ref>Carter, Helen. . '']''</ref><ref> ]</ref> In 2016, under a ] request, the ] stated that, "we do not recognise satanism as a formal religion, and will not grant facilities or make specific time available for individual 'worship'."<ref>Ministry of Defence . Navy Command FOI Section, 7 January 2016.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
In 2005, the ] debated in the case of '']'' over protecting minority ] of prison inmates after a lawsuit challenging the issue was filed to them.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/22/politics/22religion.html?pagewanted=print&position=|title=Inmates Who Follow Satanism and Wicca Find Unlikely Ally|author=Linda Greenhouse|work=The New York Times|date=22 March 2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0321/p03s02-usju.html|title=Before high court: law that allows for religious rights|journal=The Christian Science Monitor|date=21 March 2005}}</ref> The court ruled that facilities that accept federal funds cannot deny prisoners accommodations that are necessary to engage in activities for the practice of their own religious beliefs.<ref>{{cite web | last=Johnson | first=M. Alex | date=31 May 2005 | url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8047388 | title=Court upholds prisoners' religious rights | work=] | access-date=26 August 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Cutter v. Wilkinson 544 U.S. 709 (2005)|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_9877|publisher=Oyez|access-date=7 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
In 2019, The Satanic Temple was granted religious ] status.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Satanic Temple is a real religion, says IRS |url=https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2019/04/25/satanic-temple-is-real/ |access-date=2023-01-23 |website=The Salt Lake Tribune |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
==Metal and rock music == | |||
] | |||
] is a member of the Church of Satan.]] | |||
] | |||
During the 1960s and 1970s, several rock bands— namely the American band ] and the British band ], employed the imagery of Satanism and witchcraft in their work.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=462–463}} References to Satan also appeared in the work of those rock bands which were pioneering the ] genre in Britain during the 1970s.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=467}} For example, the band ] made mention of Satan in their lyrics, although some of the band's members were practicing Christians, and other lyrics affirmed the power of the Christian god over Satan.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=467–468}} In the 1980s, greater use of Satanic imagery was made by heavy metal bands such as ], ], ], and ].{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=468}} Bands active in the subgenre of ]—among them ] and ], also adopted Satanic imagery, combining it with other morbid and dark imagery, such as that of ]s and ]s.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=468–469}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
Satanism would come to be more closely associated with the subgenre of ],{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=467}} in which it was foregrounded over the other themes that had been used in death metal.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=469}} A number of black metal performers incorporated self-injury into their act, framing this as a manifestation of Satanic devotion.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=469}} The first black metal band, ], proclaimed themselves to be Satanists, although this was more an act of provocation than an expression of genuine devotion to the Devil.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=470}} Satanic themes were also used by the black metal bands ] and ].{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=472–473}} However, the first black metal act to more seriously adopt Satanism was ], whose vocalist, ], joined the ].{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=471}} More often than not musicians associating themselves with black metal say they do not believe in legitimate Satanic ideology and often profess to being atheists, agnostics, or ]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://noisey.vice.com/blog/death-to-false-satanism|title=Death to False Satanism {{!}} NOISEY|website=NOISEY|date=29 October 2014 |access-date=2016-03-08}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
In contrast to King Diamond, various black metal Satanists sought to distance themselves from LaVeyan Satanism, for instance by referring to their beliefs as "]".{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=480}} These individuals regarded Satan as a literal entity,{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=479}} and in contrast to Anton LaVey, they associated Satanism with criminality, suicide, and terror.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=480}} For them, Christianity was regarded as a plague which required eradication.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=482}} Many of these individuals, most prominently ] and ], were involved in the ].{{sfn|Dyrendal|2016|pp=481–488}}{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=479–481}} Between 1992 and 1996, such people destroyed around fifty Norwegian churches in arson attacks.{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|p=481}} Within the black metal scene, a number of musicians later replaced Satanic themes with those deriving from ], a form of ].{{sfn|Introvigne|2016|pp=503–504}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
== See also == | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{Portal|Religion|Philosophy}} | |||
] | |||
] | * '']'' | ||
* ] | |||
== References == | |||
===Notes=== | |||
{{reflist|group=Note}} | |||
=== Footnotes === | |||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
=== Sources === | |||
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Alisauskiene |first=Milda |year=2009 |c=The Peculiarities of Lithuanian Satanism |in=Petersen}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last1=Asprem |first1=Egil |last2=Granholm |first2=Kennet|title=Contemporary Esotericism |publisher=Acumen|location=Durham|year=2013|isbn=978-1-908049-32-2}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last1=Asprem |first1=Egil |author-mask1={{long dash}} |last2=Granholm |first2=Kennet |author-mask2={{long dash}} |title=Contemporary Esotericism |publisher=Routledge|location=London|year=2014|isbn=978-1-317-54357-2}} | |||
* {{cite book |title=Lucifer Rising: Sin, Devil Worship & Rock n' Roll |last=Baddeley |first=Gavin |location=London |publisher=] |year=2010 |edition=third |isbn=978-0-85965-455-5 }} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Bromley |first=David G. |author-link=David G. Bromley |editor=Lindsay Jones |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Religion |title=Satanism |edition=2 |year=2005 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |volume=12 |location=Detroit, IL}} | |||
* {{cite book|last1=Carlson |first1= Shawn |first2= Gerald |last2=Larue |date=1989 |title=Satanism in America: How the Devil Got Much More Than His Due |location=El Cerrito, CA |publisher=Gaia |pages=523–541}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Cavaglion|first1=Gabriel|last2=Sela-Shayovitz|first2=Revital|title=The Cultural Construction of Contemporary Satanic Legends in Israel|journal=Folklore|date=December 2005|volume=116 |issue=3|pages=255–271 |doi=10.1080/00155870500282701|s2cid=161360139}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Drury |first=Nevill |year=2003 |title=Magic and Witchcraft: From Shamanism to the Technopagans |location=London |publisher=Thames and Hudson |isbn=978-0500511404 }} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |contribution=Satan and the Beast: The Influence of Aleister Crowley on Modern Satanism |last=Dyrendal |first=Asbjørn |year=2012 |title=Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism |editor1=Henrik Bogdan |editor2=Martin P. Starr |publisher=] |location=Oxford and New York |isbn=978-0-19-986309-9 |pages=369–394 }} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Dyrendal |first=Asbjørn |author-mask={{long dash}} |c=Hidden Persuaders and Invisible Wars: Anton LaVey and Conspiracy Culture |title=The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity |in1=Faxneld |in2=Petersen |year=2013 |pages=123–140}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Dyrendal |first=Asbjørn |author-mask={{long dash}} |year=2016 |chapter=Satanism in Norway |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rGpyDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA481 |editor1-last=Bogdan |editor1-first=Henrik |editor2-last=Hammer |editor2-first=Olav |editor2-link=Olav Hammer |title=Western Esotericism in Scandinavia |location=] |publisher=] |series=Brill Esotericism Reference Library |pages=481–488 |doi=10.1163/9789004325968_062 |isbn=978-90-04-30241-9 |issn=2468-3566 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Dyrendal |first1=Asbjørn |author1-mask={{long dash}} |last2=Lewis |first2=James R. |last3=Petersen |first3=Jesper Aa. |year=2016 |title=The Invention of Satanism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mLaYCgAAQBAJ |publisher=] |location=Oxford and New York |isbn=978-0195181104 }} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Faxneld |first=Per |c=Post-Satanism, Left-Hand Paths, and Beyond: Visiting the Margins |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QQJlf729qUMC&pg=PA205 |in1=Faxneld |in2=Petersen |year=2013 |pages=205–208}} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Faxneld |first=Per |author-mask={{long dash}} |c=Secret Lineages and De Facto Satanists: Anton LaVey's Use of Esoteric Tradition |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f1t_BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA72 |in1=Asprem |in2=Granholm |year=2014 |pages=72–90 }} | |||
* {{harvc |last1=Faxneld |first1=Per |author-mask1={{long dash}} |last2=Petersen |first2=Jesper Aagaard |anchor-year=2013a |c=Introduction: At the Devil's Crossroads |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QQJlf729qUMC&pg=PA3 |in1=Faxneld |in2=Petersen |year=2013 |pages=3–18 }} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Faxneld |editor-first1=Per |editor-mask1={{long dash}} |editor-last2=Petersen |editor-first2=Jesper Aagaard |editor-mask2={{long dash}} |title=The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity |publisher=] |location=] |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-19-977924-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QQJlf729qUMC}} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Gallagher |first=Eugene V. |author-link=Eugene V. Gallagher |editor=Lindsay Jones |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Religion |title=New Religious Movements: Scriptures of New Religious Movements |edition=2 |year=2005 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |volume=12 |location=Detroit, IL}} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Gallagher |first=Eugene V. |author-mask={{long dash}} |contribution=Satanism and the Church of Satan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ClaySHbUEogC&pg=PA151 |title=Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America |others=Eugene V. Gallagher, W. Michael Ashcraft (editors) |year=2006 |pages=151–168 |location=] |publisher=] |isbn=978-0313050787 }} | |||
* {{cite book| last=Gardell |first=Matthias |title=Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism |year=2003 |publisher=] |location=] and London |isbn=978-0-8223-3071-4 }} | |||
* {{cite book| last=Goodrick-Clarke |first=Nicholas |author-link=Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke |title=Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the Politics of Identity |year=2003 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=978-0-8147-3155-0 }} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Granholm |first=Kennet |year=2009 |c=Embracing Others than Satan: The Multiple Princes of Darkness in the Left-Hand Path Milieu |in=Petersen |pages=85–101}} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Granholm |first=Kennet |author-mask={{long dash}} |c=The Left-Hand Path and Post-Satanism: The Temple of Set and the Evolution of Satanism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QQJlf729qUMC&pg=PA209 |in1=Faxneld |in2=Petersen |year=2013 |pages=209–228}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Harvey |first=Graham |author-link=Graham Harvey (religious studies scholar) |title=Satanism in Britain Today |journal=] |publisher=] |volume=10 |issue=3 |year=1995 |pages=283–296 |doi=10.1080/13537909508580747 }} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Harvey |first=Graham |author-mask={{long dash}} |year=2009 |c=Satanism: Performing Alterity and Othering |in=Petersen |pages=27–40}} | |||
* {{cite book |title=The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft |url=https://archive.org/details/triumphofmoonhis00hutt |url-access=registration |last=Hutton |first=Ronald |year=1999 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=978-0-1928-5449-0 }} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Introvigne |first=Massimo |author-link=Massimo Introvigne |year=2016 |title=Satanism: A Social History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nt8zDwAAQBAJ |location=] |publisher=] |series=Aries Book Series: Texts and Studies in Western Esotericism |volume=21 |isbn=978-90-04-28828-7 |oclc=1030572947 }} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Kaplan |first=Jeffrey |contribution=Order of Nine Angles |title=Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right |others=Jeffrey Kaplan (editor) |publisher=] |location=] |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-7425-0340-3 |pages=235–238 }} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=La Fontaine |first=Jean |author-link=Jean La Fontaine |contribution=Satanism and Satanic Mythology |title=Witchcraft and Magic in Europe |series=Vol. 6: The Twentieth Century |editor1=Bengt Ankarloo |editor2=Stuart Clark |publisher=Athlone |location=London |year=1999 |isbn=0-485-89006-2 |pages=81–140 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=La Fontaine |first=Jean |author-mask={{long dash}} |year=2016 |title=Witches and Demons: A Comparative Perspective on Witchcraft and Satanism |location=Oxford and New York |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-78533-085-8 }} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Lap |first=Amina Olander |c=Categorizing Modern Satanism: An Analysis of LaVey's Early Writings |title=The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity |in1=Faxneld |in2=Petersen |location=Oxford |year=2013 |pages=83–102}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=LaVey|first=Anton Szandor|title=The Satanic Bible|year=2005|publisher=Avon Books |location=New York|orig-year=1969|isbn=978-0-380-01539-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/satanicbible00lave}} | |||
* {{cite book|first1=Joseph P. |last1=Laycock |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/satanism/4150D0B522022169485FCD56FA7FE2BE |title=Satanism|year=2023 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |series=Elements in New Religious Movements |isbn=9781009057349 |edition=online |ref=JPLS2023}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Lewis|first=James R.|author-link=James R. Lewis (scholar)|title=Satanism Today: An Encyclopedia of Religion, Folklore, and Popular Culture|year=2001|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-292-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LxCwyChmJrAC}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last=Lewis|first=James R.|author-mask1={{long dash}}|title=Diabolical Authority: Anton LaVey, The Satanic Bible and the Satanist "Tradition"|journal=Marburg Journal of Religion|date=September 2002|volume=7 |issue=1|pages=1–16 |url=http://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/mjr/lewis3.html}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Lewis|first=James R.|author-mask1={{long dash}}|title=Legitimating New Religions |year=2003|publisher=Rutgers University Press|location=New Brunswick, NJ|isbn=978-0-8135-3534-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdYSdts1udcC}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Lewis |editor-first1=James R. |editor-mask1={{long dash}} |editor-last2=Petersen |editor-first2=Jesper Aagaard |title=Controversial New Religions |publisher=] |location=] |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-19-515683-6}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Lewis |editor-first1=James R. |editor-mask1={{long dash}} |editor-last2=Petersen |editor-first2=Jesper Aagaard |editor-mask2={{long dash}} |title=Controversial New Religions |publisher=] |location=] |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-19-931530-7 |edition=2nd}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Maxwell-Stuart |first=P. G. |title=Satan: A Biography |publisher=Amberley |location=Stroud |year=2011 |isbn=978-1-4456-0575-3 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Medway |first=Gareth J. |title=Lure of the Sinister: The Unnatural History of Satanism |publisher=] |location=London and New York |year=2001 |isbn=9780814756454 }} | |||
* {{cite book| last=Monette |first=Connell |title=Mysticism in the 21st Century |year=2013 |publisher=Sirius Academic Press |location=] |isbn=978-1-940964-00-3 }} | |||
* {{cite book|title=The Devil, a Very Short Introduction| last1=Oldridge| first1=Darren| publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2012}} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Petersen |first=Jesper Aagaard |c=Modern Satanism: Dark Doctrines and Black Flames|publisher=] |location=] |year=2005 |in1=Lewis |in2=Petersen |pages=423–458 }} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Petersen |first=Jesper Aagaard |author-mask={{long dash}} |anchor-year=2009a |c=Introduction: Embracing Satan |in=Petersen |year=2009}} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Petersen |first=Jesper Aagaard |author-mask={{long dash}} |c=From Book to Bit: Enacting Satanism Online |in1=Asprem |in2=Granholm |year=2013 |pages=134–158}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last=Petersen |editor-first=Jesper Aagaard |editor-mask={{long dash}} |title=Contemporary Religious Satanism: A Critical Anthology |year=2009 |location=] |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-7546-5286-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1ovVPyL6AmwC}} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Rothschild |first1=Mike |title=The Storm Is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything |year= 2021 |publisher=Melville House |isbn=978-1612199306}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Ryan |first=Nick |title=Homeland: Into a World of Hate |year=2003 |publisher=] |location=] and London |isbn=978-1-84018-465-5 }} | |||
* {{cite book |title=Witchcraft and Magic in Sixteenth and Seventeenth-Century Europe |last1=Scarre |first1=Geoffrey |last2=Callow |first2=John |publisher=] |location=] |year=2001 |edition=second |isbn=9780333920824 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Schipper |first=Bernd U. |title=From Milton to Modern Satanism: The History of the Devil and the Dynamics between Religion and Literature |journal=Journal of Religion in Europe |volume=3 |issue=1 |year=2010 |pages=103–124 |doi=10.1163/187489210X12597396698744}} | |||
* {{harvc |last=Senholt |first=Jacob C. |c=Secret Identities in the Sinister Tradition: Political Esotericism and the Convergence of Radical Islam, Satanism, and National Socialism in the Order of Nine Angles |in1=Faxneld |in2=Petersen |year=2013 |pages=250–274}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Sieg |first=George |title=Angular Momentum: From Traditional to Progressive Satanism in the Order of Nine Angles |journal=International Journal for the Study of New Religions |volume=4 |number=2 |year=2013 |doi=10.1558/ijsnr.v4i2.251 |pages=251–283 }} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Taub|first1=Diane E.|last2=Nelson|first2=Lawrence D.|title=Satanism in Contemporary America: Establishment or Underground?|journal=The Sociological Quarterly|date=August 1993|volume=34|issue=3 |pages=523–541 |doi=10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00124.x}} | |||
*{{cite book |title=Witch, Wicce, Mother Goose: The Rise and Fall of the Witch Hunts in Europe and North America |year=2001 |last=Thurston |first=Robert W. |author-link=Robert W. Thurston |publisher=Longman |location=Edinburgh |isbn=978-0582438064 }} | |||
* {{cite book |first=Ruben |last=van Luijk |year=2016 |title=Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism |location=] |publisher=] |isbn=9780190275105 }} | |||
*{{cite book| authorlink=Jay Wexler |last=Wexler |first=Jay |title=Our Non-Christian Nation: How Atheists, Satanists, Pagans, and Others Are Demanding Their Rightful Place in Public Life |isbn=9780804798990 |publisher=Redwood Press, imprint of ]|year=2019 }} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Wright|first=Lawrence|title=Saints & Sinners|year=1993|publisher=Alfred A. Knopf |location=New York|isbn=0-394-57924-0|author-link=Lawrence Wright |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1bwDrFdnNcsC}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
* {{cite book |author1-last=Holt |author1-first=Cimminnee |author2-last=Petersen |author2-first=Jesper Aagaard |year=2016 |orig-year=2008 |chapter=Modern Religious Satanism: A Negotiation of Tensions |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-JZHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA441 |editor1-last=Lewis |editor1-first=James R. |editor1-link=James R. Lewis (scholar) |editor2-last=Tøllefsen |editor2-first=Inga |title=The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements, Volume 2 |location=New York |publisher=] |edition=2nd |pages=441–452 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190466176.013.33 |isbn=978-0-19-046617-6}} | |||
* {{cite web |last=Introvigne |first=Massimo |author-link=Massimo Introvigne |date=13 April 2017 |title=Satan the Prophet: A History of Modern Satanism |url=https://www.cesnur.org/2017/satanism.pdf |website=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170628231853/https://www.cesnur.org/2017/satanism.pdf |archive-date=28 June 2017 |url-status=live |access-date=28 December 2020}} | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Commons|Satanism}} | |||
<!-- | |||
NOTE TO EDITORS: | |||
Before adding any external links to this section, please read Misplaced Pages's external links policy at http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:EL and the "Links to be avoided" section especially. If the site you are linking to is primarily a blog or forum with little additional content, then it will be removed, as it contravenes the agreed conventions for inclusion. | |||
--> | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220720194256/https://www.religioustolerance.org/satanism.htm |date=20 July 2022 }} | |||
<!-- IF YOU ADD A LINK, CITE WHAT PART OF http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:ELYES THE LINK MEETS IN THE EDIT SUMMARY! --> | |||
{{Satan}} | |||
{{New Religious Movements}} | |||
{{New Religious Movements in the United States}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 17:14, 29 December 2024
Ideological and philosophical beliefs based on Satan"Satanist" redirects here. Not to be confused with Sethianism. For other uses, see Satanism (disambiguation) and Satanist (disambiguation).
Satanism refers to a group of religious, ideological, and/or philosophical beliefs based on Satan—particularly his worship or veneration. Satan is associated with the Devil in Christianity, a fallen angel regarded as chief of the demons who tempt humans into sin. The phenomenon of Satanism shares "historical connections and family resemblances" with the Left Hand Path milieu of other occult figures such as Beelzebub, Chaos, Hecate, Lilith, Lucifer, and Set. Self-identified Satanism is a relatively modern phenomenon, largely attributed to the 1966 founding of the Church of Satan by Anton LaVey in the United States—an atheistic group that does not believe in a supernatural Satan.
Accusations of groups engaged in "devil worship" have echoed throughout much of Christian history. During the Middle Ages, the Inquisition led by the Catholic Church alleged that various heretical Christian sects and groups, such as the Knights Templar and the Cathars, performed secret Satanic rituals. In the subsequent Early Modern period, belief in a widespread Satanic conspiracy of witches resulted in the trials and executions of tens of thousands of alleged witches across Europe and the North American colonies, peaking between 1560 and 1630 CE. The terms Satanist and Satanism emerged during the Reformation and Counter-Reformation (1517–1700 CE), as both Catholics and Protestants accused each other of intentionally being in league with Satan.
Since the 19th century various small religious groups have emerged that identify as Satanist or use Satanic iconography. While the groups that appeared after the 1960s differed greatly, they can be broadly divided into theistic Satanism and atheistic Satanism. Those venerating Satan as a supernatural deity are unlikely to ascribe omnipotence, instead relating to Satan as a patriarch. Atheistic Satanists regard Satan as a symbol of certain human traits, a useful metaphor without ontological reality. Contemporary religious Satanism is predominantly an American phenomenon, although the rise of globalization and the Internet have seen these ideas spread to other parts of the world.
Devil in society
Historical and anthropological research suggests that nearly all societies have developed the idea of a sinister and anti-human force that can hide itself within society. This commonly involves a belief in witches, a group of individuals who invert the norms of their society and seek to harm their community, for instance by engaging in incest, murder, and cannibalism. Allegations of witchcraft may have different causes and serve different functions within a society. For instance, they may serve to uphold social norms, to heighten the tension in existing conflicts between individuals, or to scapegoat certain individuals for various social problems.
Another contributing factor to the idea of Satanism is the concept that there is an agent of misfortune and evil who operates on a cosmic scale, something usually associated with a strong form of ethical dualism that divides the world clearly into forces of good and forces of evil. The earliest such entity known is Angra Mainyu, a figure that appears in the Persian religion of Zoroastrianism. This concept was also embraced by Judaism and early Christianity, and although it was soon marginalized within Jewish thought, it gained increasing importance within early Christian understandings of the cosmos.
The Native South American terrible god Tiw is traditionally honored with the syncretic dance and parade Diablada ('Dance of the Devils') that was opposed to the Catholic Church in origin.
Etymology and definitions
Etymology
The term Satan has evolved from a Hebrew term for "adversary" or "to oppose", into the Christian figure of a fallen angel who tempts mortals into sin. The word Satan was not originally a proper name, but rather an ordinary noun that means "adversary". In this context, it appears at several points in the Old Testament. For instance, in the Book of Samuel, David is presented as the satan ("adversary") of the Philistines, while in the Book of Numbers, the term appears as a verb, when Jehovah sent an angel to satan ("to oppose") Balaam.
Prior to the composition of the New Testament, the idea developed within Jewish communities that Satan was the name of an angel who had rebelled against Jehovah and had been cast out of Heaven along with his followers; this account would be incorporated into contemporary texts such as the Book of Enoch. This Satan was then featured in parts of the New Testament, where he was presented as a figure who tempts humans to commit sin; in the Book of Matthew and the Book of Luke, he attempted to tempt Jesus of Nazareth as the latter fasted in the wilderness.
While the early Christian idea of the Devil was not well developed, it gradually adapted and expanded through the creation of folklore, art, theological treatises, and morality tales, thus providing the character with a range of extra-Biblical associations. Beginning in the early middle ages, the concept developed in Christianity of the devil as "archrepresentative of evil", and of the Satanist "as malign mirror image of the good Christian".
The word Satanism was adopted into English from the French satanisme. The terms Satanism and Satanist are first recorded as appearing in the English and French languages during the 16th century, when they were used by Christian groups to attack other, rival Christian groups. In a Roman Catholic tract of 1565, the author condemns the "heresies, blasphemies, and sathanismes " of the Protestants. In an Anglican work of 1559, Anabaptists and other Protestant sects are condemned as "swarmes of Satanistes ". As used in this manner, the term Satanism was not used to claim that people literally worshipped Satan, but instead that they deviated from true Christianity, and thus were serving the will of Satan. During the 19th century, the term Satanism began to be used to describe those considered to lead a broadly immoral lifestyle, and it was only in the late 19th century that it came to be applied in English to individuals who were believed to consciously and deliberately venerate Satan. This latter meaning had appeared earlier in the Swedish language; the Lutheran Bishop Laurentius Paulinus Gothus had described devil-worshipping sorcerers as Sathanister in his Ethica Christiana, produced between 1615 and 1630.
Accused v. identified
Some definitions of Satanism offered/suggested by scholars include:
- the worship or veneration of the figure from Christian belief known as Satan, the Devil or Lucifer (Ethan Doyle White);
- the "intentional, religiously motivated veneration of Satan" (Religion scholar Ruben van Luijk);
- "a system in which Satan is celebrated in a prominent position" (Satanism scholar Per Faxneld). (This definition has the advantage of avoiding "assumptions about the nature of religion").
- the simultaneous presence of three characteristics:
- 1) the worship of the character in the Bible whose name is Satan or Lucifer,
- 2) the organization of these "Satanists" into a group with at least some kind of organization and hierarchy, and ...
- 3) and has some kind of ritual or liturgical practices
- whether the group with these characteristics perceives Satan as personal or impersonal, real or symbolic, does not matter. (Italian sociologist Massimo Introvigne writing in 1994).
But these definitions of Satanism are limited to
- figures and groups who identify as Satanists or at least admirers of Satan (Romantic Satanists, hellfire clubs and modern Satanists).
... excluding
- figures and groups accused of worshipping Satan and in the process committing horrible crimes (in the middle ages, during the 1980–1994 Satanic ritual abuse moral panic, etc.) but who either appear to have not been satanists or to not have actually existed.
And by excluding the second group, you leave out most of the history of Satanism, (Joseph P. Laycock argues).
If you do include both groups, you have two sides with very different views on who or what Satan was/is and represented. The accusers usually follow the Christian idea of Satan as an irredeemably evil fallen angel who seeks the destruction of both God and humanity, but who (along with his followers) is doomed to fail and to suffer eternal punishment. While the self-identified Satanists often do not believe that Satan actually exists as a being (they believe he is a symbol and a "Promethean figure", "an esoteric symbol of a vital force that permeates the universe"), let alone is trying to destroy humanity.
A definitions/descriptions that would include the "satanism" of heresy crusades and moral panics is:
- an invention of Christianity, relying on a character deriving from Christian mythology, i.e. Satan, (another description of Satanism by Ruben van Luijk).
In their study of Satanism, the religious studies scholars Asbjørn Dyrendal, James R. Lewis, and Jesper Aa. Petersen stated that the term Satanism "has a history of being a designation made by people against those whom they dislike; it is a term used for 'othering'".
Eugene Gallagher noted that Satanism was usually "a polemical, not a descriptive term".
Similar to the way certain Christian denominations accuse each other of heresy, different satanic groups—mainly the Church of Satan (CoS), the Temple of Set (ToS), the Order of Nine Angles (ONA), and The Satanic Temple (TST)—often accuse one another of being fraudulent Satanists and/or ignorant of true Satanism.
Related terms
Because the original concept of Satan came from Judaism and was embraced by Christianity, and because Satanists, almost by definition, oppose the teachings of those religions, people drawn to Satanism will often move on to "post-Satanism", i.e. to a religion that does not declare itself "Satanic", but includes elements of Satanism (e.g. Temple of Set). Others may regards themselves as Satanists but promote mythological figures and traditions outside of Christianity or Judaism. These religions are sometimes called Satanic and sometimes post-Satanic.
Diane E. Taub and Lawrence D. Nelson complain that Satanism "is frequently defined either too broadly or too narrowly", with accusers sometimes including non-satanic groups such as Santeria, Witchcraft, Eastern religions as well as Freemasonry; and academics (for example Carlson and Larue) and others sometimes restricting its definition to "recognized Satanic churches and their members", excluding those who "believes in a literal Satan". Taub and Nelson define Satanism as "the literal or symbolic worship of Satan, the enemy of the Judeo-Christian God".
Accusations of Satanism
According to author Arthur Lyons, "Satanic religions are as old as monotheism and have their origins in Persia of the sixth century", and Joe Carter of the conservative ecumenical journal First Things writes that "real satanism has been around since the beginning of history, selling an appealing message: Your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God."
On the other hand, religious scholar Joseph Laycock writes that the "available evidence suggests" that Satanism began as "an imaginary religion Christians invented to demonize their opponents". Confessions of worship of Satan came only after torture or other forms of coercion in early modern Europe. While early stories of satanic activity have been commonly labeled and regarded as propaganda based on falsehood, they also partially shaped the beliefs of what would become modern religious Satanism. Those who absorbed and accepted the tales sometimes began to imitate them (celebrating Black Masses for example), a process known to folklorists as "ostension".
Medieval and Early Modern Christendom
See also: European witchcraft, Maleficium (sorcery), and Witch-cult hypothesisAs Christianity expanded throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe, it came into contact with a variety of other religions, which it regarded as "pagan". Christianity being a monotheist religion, Christian theologians believed that since there was only one God (the God of Christianity) the gods and goddesses with supernatural powers venerated by these "pagans" could not be genuine divinities but must actually be demons. However, they did not believe that "pagans" were deliberately worshipping devils, but were instead simply misguided and unaware of the "true" God.
Those Christian groups regarded as heretics by the Roman Catholic Church were treated differently, with theologians arguing that they were deliberately worshipping the Devil. This was accompanied by claims that such individuals engaged in acts of evil—incestuous sexual orgies, the murder of infants, and cannibalism—all stock accusations that had previously been leveled at Christians themselves in the Roman Empire. In Christian iconography, the Devil and demons were given the physical traits of figures from classical mythology, such as the god Pan, fauns, and satyrs.
The first recorded example of such an accusation being made within Western Christianity took place in Toulouse in 1022, when two clerics were tried for allegedly venerating a demon. Throughout the Middle Ages, this accusation would be applied to a wide range of Christian heretical groups, including the Paulicians, Bogomils, Cathars, Waldensians, and the Hussites. The Knights Templar were accused of worshipping an idol known as Baphomet, with Lucifer having appeared at their meetings in the form of a cat. As well as these Christian groups, these claims were also made about Europe's Jewish community. In the 13th century, there were also references made to a group of "Luciferians" led by a woman named Lucardis which hoped to see Satan rule in Heaven. References to this group continued into the 14th century, although historians studying the allegations concur that these Luciferians were probably a fictitious invention.
Within Christian thought, the idea developed that certain individuals could make a pact with Satan. This may have emerged after observing that pacts with gods and goddesses played a role in various pre-Christian belief systems, or that such pacts were also made as part of the Christian cult of saints. Another possibility is that it derives from a misunderstanding of Augustine of Hippo's condemnation of augury in his On Christian Doctrine, written in the late 4th century. Here, he stated that people who consulted augurs were entering quasi pacts (covenants) with demons. The idea of the diabolical pact made with demons was popularized across Europe in the story of Faust, probably based in part on the real life Johann Georg Faust.
As the late medieval gave way to the early modern period, European Christendom experienced a schism between the established Roman Catholic Church and the breakaway Protestant movement. In the ensuing Reformation and Counter-Reformation (1517–1700 CE), both Catholics and Protestants accused each other of deliberately being in league with Satan. It was in this context that the terms Satanist and Satanism emerged.
Witch trials
The early modern period also saw fear of Satanists reach its "historical apogee" in the form of the witch trials of the fifteenth to the eighteenth centuries, when between 30,000 and 50,000 alleged witches were executed. This came about as the accusations which had been leveled at medieval heretics, among them that of devil-worship, were applied to the pre-existing idea of the witch, or practitioner of malevolent magic. The idea of a conspiracy of Satanic witches was developed by educated elites, although the concept of malevolent witchcraft was a widespread part of popular belief, and folkloric ideas about the night witch, the wild hunt, and the dance of the fairies were incorporated into it. The earliest trials took place in Northern Italy and France, before spreading it out to other areas of Europe and to Britain's North American colonies, being carried out by the legal authorities in both Catholic and Protestant regions.
Most historians agree that the majority of those persecuted in these witch trials were innocent of any involvement in Devil worship. Historian Darren Eldridge writes that claims that there actually was a cult of devil-worshippers being pursued by witch hunters "have not survived the scrutiny of surviving trial records" done by historians from 1962 to 2012. However, in their summary of the evidence for the trials, the historians Geoffrey Scarre and John Callow thought it "without doubt" that some of those accused in the trials had been guilty of employing magic in an attempt to harm their enemies and were thus genuinely guilty of witchcraft.
Affair of the Poisons
Main article: Affair of the PoisonsIn a scandal starting with the poisoning of three people, prominent members of the French aristocracy, including members of the king's inner circle, were implicated and sentenced on charges of poisoning and witchcraft. Between 1677 and 1682, during the reign of King Louis XIV, 36 people were executed in Satanic panic known to history as the Affair of the Poisons. At least some of the accusers were implicated others under torture and in hopes of saving their lives. These highly unreliable reports include what "may be the first report of a satanic mass using a woman as an altar".
18th- to 20th-century Christendom
The Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution changed humanity's understanding of the world. The mathematics of Isaac Newton and psychology of John Locke "left little space for the intervention of supernatural beings". Charles Darwin's theory of evolution undermined the doctrine of the Fall in the Garden of Eden and the role of the diabolical serpent, while also providing an "alternative account of human evil" in the form of "a residual effect of our animal nature". The Industrial Revolution and urbanization disturbed traditional social relations and folk ideas to undermine belief in witchcraft and the devil. Understanding of disorders of the mind undercut demonic possession. But while the hunting and killing of alleged witches waned, belief in Satan did not disappear.
During the 18th century, gentleman's social clubs became increasingly prominent in Britain and Ireland, among the most secretive of which were the Hellfire Clubs, which were first reported in the 1720s. The most famous of these groups was the Order of the Knights of Saint Francis, which was founded circa 1750 by the aristocrat Sir Francis Dashwood and which assembled first at his estate at West Wycombe and later in Medmenham Abbey. A number of contemporary press sources portrayed these as gatherings of atheist rakes where Christianity was mocked, and toasts were made to the Devil. Beyond these sensationalist accounts, which may not be accurate portrayals of actual events, little is known about the activities of the Hellfire Clubs. Introvigne suggested that they may have engaged in a form of "playful Satanism" in which Satan was invoked "to show a daring contempt for conventional morality" rather than to pay homage to him.
The French Revolution of 1789 dealt a blow to the hegemony of the Roman Catholic Church in parts of Europe, and soon a number of Catholic authors began making claims that it had been masterminded by a conspiratorial group of Satanists. Among the first to do so was French Catholic priest Jean-Baptiste Fiard, who publicly claimed that a wide range of individuals, from the Jacobins to tarot card readers, were part of a Satanic conspiracy. Fiard's ideas were furthered by Alexis-Vincent-Charles Berbiguier de Terre-Neuve du Thym (1765–1851), who devoted a lengthy book to this conspiracy theory; he claimed that Satanists had supernatural powers allowing them to curse people and to shapeshift into both cats and fleas. Although most of his contemporaries regarded Berbiguier as suffering from mental illness, his ideas gained credence among many occultists, including Stanislas de Guaita, a Cabalist who used them for the basis of his book, The Temple of Satan.
A reaction to this was the Taxil hoax in 1890s France, where an anti-clerical writer Léo Taxil (aka Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès), publicly converted to Catholicism and then published several works alleging to expose the Satanic doings of Freemasons. In 1897, Taxil called a press conference promising to introduce a key character of his stories but instead announced that his revelations about the Freemasons were made up, and thanked the Catholic clergy for helping to publicize his stories. Nine years later he told an American magazine that at first he thought readers would recognize his tales as obvious nonsense, "amusement pure and simple", but when he realized they believed his stories and that there was "lots of money" to be made in publishing them, he continued to perpetrate the hoax. Around the same time, another convert to Catholicism Joris-Karl Huysmans, also helped promote the concept of active Satanist groups in his 1891 work Là-bas (Down There). Huysmans "helped to cement" the idea the black mass as Satanic rite and inversion of the Roman Catholic mass, with a naked woman for an altar. (Unlike Taxil, his conversion was apparently genuine and his book was published as fiction.)
In the early 20th century, the British novelist Dennis Wheatley produced a range of influential novels in which his protagonists battled Satanic groups. At the same time, non-fiction authors such as Montague Summers and Rollo Ahmed published books claiming that Satanic groups practicing black magic were still active across the world, although they provided no evidence that this was the case. During the 1950s, various British tabloid newspapers repeated such claims, largely basing their accounts on the allegations of one woman, Sarah Jackson, who claimed to have been a member of such a group. In 1973, the British Christian Doreen Irvine published From Witchcraft to Christ, in which she claimed to have been a member of a Satanic group that gave her supernatural powers, such as the ability to levitate, before she escaped and embraced Christianity.
In the United States during the 1960s and 1970s, various Christian preachers—the most famous being Mike Warnke in his 1972 book The Satan-Seller—claimed that they had been members of Satanic groups who carried out sex rituals and animal sacrifices before discovering Christianity. According to Gareth Medway in his historical examination of Satanism, these stories were "a series of inventions by insecure people and hack writers, each one based on a previous story, exaggerated a little more each time".
Other publications made allegations of Satanism against historical figures. The 1970s saw the publication of the Romanian Protestant preacher Richard Wurmbrand's book in which he argued—without corroborating evidence—that the socio-political theorist Karl Marx had been a Satanist.
Ritual abuse hysteria
Main article: Satanic panicAt the end of the 20th century, a moral panic arose from claims that a Devil-worshipping cult was committing sexual abuse, murder, and cannibalism in its rituals, and including children among the victims of its rites. Initially, the alleged perpetrators of such crimes were labeled "witches", although the term Satanist was soon adopted as a favored alternative, and the phenomenon itself came to be called "the Satanism Scare". Those active in the scare alleged that there was a conspiracy of organized Satanists who occupied prominent positions throughout society, from the police to politicians, and that they had been powerful enough to cover up their crimes.
Sociologist of religion Massimo Introvigne, 2016Preceded by some significant but isolated episodes in the 1970s, a great Satanism scare exploded in the 1980s in the United States and Canada and was subsequently exported towards England, Australia, and other countries. It was unprecedented in history. It surpassed even the results of Taxil's propaganda, and has been compared with the most virulent periods of witch hunting. The scare started in 1980 and declined slowly between 1990... and 1994, when official British and American reports denied the real existence of ritual satanic crimes. Particularly outside the U.S. and U.K., however, its consequences are still felt today.
One of the primary sources for the scare was Michelle Remembers, a 1980 book by the Canadian psychiatrist Lawrence Pazder in which he detailed what he claimed were the repressed memories of his patient (and wife) Michelle Smith. Smith had claimed that as a child she had been abused by her family in Satanic rituals in which babies were sacrificed and Satan himself appeared. In 1983, allegations were made that the McMartin family—owners of a preschool in California—were guilty of sexually abusing the children in their care during Satanic rituals. The allegations resulted in a lengthy and expensive trial, in which all of the accused would eventually be cleared. The publicity generated by the case resulted in similar allegations being made in various other parts of the United States.
A key claim by the "anti-Satanists" of the Satanic Scare was that any child's claim about Satanic ritual abuse must be true, because children do not lie. Although some involved in the anti-Satanism movement were from Jewish and secular backgrounds, a central part was played by fundamentalist and evangelical Christians, in particular Pentecostalist Christians, with Christian groups holding conferences and producing books and videotapes to promote belief in the conspiracy. Various figures in law enforcement also came to be promoters of the conspiracy theory, with such "cult cops" holding various conferences to promote it. The scare was later imported to the United Kingdom through visiting evangelicals and became popular among some of the country's social workers, resulting in a range of accusations and trials across Britain.
In the late 1980s, the Satanic Scare had lost its impetus following increasing skepticism about such allegations, and a number of those who had been convicted of perpetrating Satanic ritual abuse saw their convictions overturned. In 1990, an agent of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Ken Lanning, revealed that he had investigated 300 allegations of Satanic ritual abuse and found no evidence for Satanism or ritualistic activity in any of them. In the UK, the Department of Health commissioned the anthropologist Jean La Fontaine to examine the allegations of SRA. She noted that while approximately half did reveal evidence of genuine sexual abuse of children, none revealed any evidence that Satanist groups had been involved or that any murders had taken place. She noted three examples in which lone individuals engaged in child molestation had created a ritual performance to facilitate their sexual acts, with the intent of frightening their victims and justifying their actions, but that none of these child molesters were involved in wider Satanist groups.
By 1994, the Satanic ritual abuse hysteria had died down in the US and UK, and by the 21st century, hysteria about Satanism has waned in most Western countries, although allegations of Satanic ritual abuse continued to surface in parts of continental Europe and Latin America. In the United States SRA ideas persisted among much of the public even as law enforcement had grown tired of false leads. A 1994 survey for the women's magazine Redbook reported in 1994,
- 70 percent of those polled "believe that at least some people who claim that they were abused by satanic cults as children, but repressed the memories for years, are telling the truth"
- 32 percent agreed with the statement, "The FBI and the police ignore evidence because they don't want to admit the cults exist", and
- 22 percent agreed that cult leaders use brainwashing to ensure that the victims would not tell.
QAnon
Main article: QAnonAnother Satanic conspiracy theory arose in the United States by 2017, with unsubstantiated allegations of organized Devil-worshippers in prominent positions committing sexual abuse, murder, and cannibalism. The source of such claims began within a far-right political movement, made by an anonymous individual or individuals known as "Q", which were relayed and developed by online communities and influencers. The central QAnon claim purports that a global child sex trafficking ring made up of Democratic politicians, Hollywood actors, high-ranking government officials, business tycoons, and medical experts, were kidnapping, sexually abusing and eating children, but that (then-President) Donald Trump would round up the cabal and bring them to justice in a climactic event known to supporters as "the storm". With the lack of any evidence of child abuse or harm, and failure of the prophesized "storm" to appear before the inauguration of a new president, the conspiracy has waned but not entirely disappeared.
Precursors of modern Satanism
Literary
From the late 1600s through to the 1800s, the character of Satan was increasingly rendered unimportant in western philosophy, and ignored in Christian theology, while in folklore he came to be seen as a foolish rather than a menacing figure. The development of new values in the Age of Enlightenment (in particular, those of reason and individualism) contributed to a shift in many Europeans' concept of Satan. In this context, a number of individuals took Satan out of the traditional Christian narrative and reread and reinterpreted him in light of their own time and their own interests, in turn generating new and different portraits of Satan.
The shifting concept of Satan owes many of its origins to John Milton's epic poem Paradise Lost (1667), in which Satan features as the protagonist. Milton was a Puritan and had never intended for his depiction of Satan to be a sympathetic one. However, in portraying Satan as a victim of his own pride who rebelled against the Judeo-Christian god, Milton humanized him and also allowed him to be interpreted as a rebel against tyranny. In this vein, the 19th century saw the emergence of what has been termed literary Satanism or romantic Satanism, where in poetry, plays, and novels, God is portrayed not as benevolent but using His omnipotent power for tyranny. Whereas in Christian doctrine Satan was an enemy of not only god but humanity, in the romantic portrayal he was a brave, noble, rebel against tyranny, a friend to other victims of the all powerful bully, i.e. humans. These writers saw Satan as a metaphor to criticize the power of churches and state and to champion the values of reason and liberty.
This was how Milton's Satan was understood by John Dryden and later readers such as the publisher Joseph Johnson, and the anarchist philosopher William Godwin, who reflected it in his 1793 book Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Paradise Lost gained a wide readership in the 18th century, both in Britain and in continental Europe, where it had been translated into French by Voltaire. Milton thus became "a central character in rewriting Satanism" and would be viewed by many later religious Satanists as a "de facto Satanist".
According to Ruben van Luijk, this cannot be seen as a "coherent movement with a single voice, but rather as a post factum identified group of sometimes widely divergent authors among whom a similar theme is found". For the literary Satanists, Satan was depicted as a benevolent and sometimes heroic figure, with these more sympathetic portrayals proliferating in the art and poetry of many romanticist and decadent figures. For these individuals, Satanism was not a religious belief or ritual activity, but rather a "strategic use of a symbol and a character as part of artistic and political expression".
Among the romanticist poets to adopt this concept of Satan was the English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, who had been influenced by Milton. In his poem Laon and Cythna, Shelley praised the "serpent", a reference to Satan, as a force for good in the universe. Another was Shelley's fellow British poet Lord Byron, who included Satanic themes in his 1821 play Cain, which was a dramatization of the Biblical story of Cain and Abel. These more positive portrayals also developed in France; one example was the 1823 work Eloa by Alfred de Vigny. Satan was also adopted by the French poet Victor Hugo, who made the character's fall from Heaven a central aspect of his La Fin de Satan, in which he outlined his own cosmogony. Although the likes of Shelley and Byron promoted a positive image of Satan in their work, there is no evidence that any of them performed religious rites to venerate him, and thus they cannot be considered to be religious Satanists.
Radical left-wing political ideas had been spread by the American Revolution of 1775–83 and the French Revolution of 1789–99. The figure of Satan, who was seen as having rebelled against the tyranny imposed by Jehovah, was appealing to many of the radical leftists of the period. For them, Satan was "a symbol for the struggle against tyranny, injustice, and oppression... a mythical figure of rebellion for an age of revolutions, a larger-than-life individual for an age of individualism, a free thinker in an age struggling for free thought". The French anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who was a staunch critic of Christianity, embraced Satan as a symbol of liberty in several of his writings. Another prominent 19th century anarchist, the Russian Mikhail Bakunin, similarly described the figure of Satan as "the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds" in his book God and the State. These ideas probably inspired the American feminist activist Moses Harman to name his anarchist periodical Lucifer the Lightbearer. The idea of this "Leftist Satan" declined during the 20th century.
Occult
In 17th-century Sweden, a number of highway robbers and other outlaws living in the forests informed judges that they venerated Satan because he provided more practical assistance than Jehovah, practices now regarded as "folkloric Satanism".
The figure of "Lucifer" was taken up by the French ceremonial magician Éliphas Lévi (1810–1875), who shocked convention by turning the traditional figure of evil into a brave rebel against tyranny. Lévi has been described as a "Romantic Satanist", a Romantic literary movement that formed no organizations and did not worship Satan, but did make a crucial break away from the traditional Christian figure of the "Lord of Darkness" doomed to failure and punishment for his wickedness. They reimagined Satan as an enemy of God the powerful, but not of the weak and mortal human race. In other words, a figure humans could sympathize with. As Lévi moved toward political conservatism in later life, he retained the use of the term, but instead applied it to what he believed was a morally neutral facet of "the absolute".
Lévi was not the only occultist who used the term Lucifer without adopting the term Satan in a similar way. The early Theosophical Society believed that "Lucifer" was a force that aided humanity's awakening to its own spiritual nature; the Society began publishing the journal Lucifer in 1887.
The first person to promote an explicitly "Satanic" philosophy was the Polish writer Stanisław Przybyszewski (1868–1927), a "decadent Bohemian" who based his ideology on Social Darwinism of the 1890s, publishing The Synagogue of Satan in 1897.
Danish occultist Carl William Hansen (1872–1936), who used the pen name Ben Kadosh, listed "Luciferian" as his religious affiliation in answer to the Danish national census (his wife and children were listed as Lutheran), making him among the earliest "self-declared Satanists". Hansen sought to spread a cult of Satan/Lucifer, and was involved in a variety of esoteric groups, including Martinism, Freemasonry, and Ordo Templi Orientis, drawing on their ideas to establish his own philosophy. He provided a Luciferian interpretation of Freemasonry in a 1906 pamphlet, although his work had little influence outside of Denmark.
Throughout his life British occultist Aleister Crowley (1875–1947) was widely described as a Satanist, usually by detractors. Crowley did not consider himself a Satanist, nor did he worship Satan, as he did not accept the Christian world view in which Satan was believed to exist. He nevertheless used imagery considered satanic, for instance, describing himself as "the Beast 666" and referring to the Whore of Babylon in his work, sending "Antichristmas cards" to his friends later in life. Crowley "in many ways embodies the pre-Satanist esoteric discourse on Satan and Satanism through his lifestyle and his philosophy", with his "image and thought" becoming an "important influence" on the later development of religious Satanism. Both Crowley and LaVey "cultivated a sinister public image and sported shaved heads".
In 1928, the Fraternitas Saturni (FS) was established in Germany; its founder, Eugen Grosche, published Satanische Magie ("Satanic Magic") that same year. The group connected Satan to Saturn, claiming that the planet related to the Sun in the same manner that Lucifer relates to the human world.
Maria de Naglowska, a Russian occultist who had fled to France following the Russian Revolution, established the esoteric group Brotherhood of the Golden Arrow in Paris in 1932. She promoted a theology centered on what she called the Third Term of the Trinity consisting of Father, Son, and Sex, the last of which she deemed to be most important. Her early disciples, who underwent what she called "Satanic Initiations", included models and art students recruited from bohemian circles. The Golden Arrow disbanded after Naglowska abandoned it in 1936. Hers was "a quite complicated Satanism, built on a complex philosophical vision of the world, of which little would survive its initiator".
Herbert Sloane claims Our Lady of Endor Coven, a Satanic group based in Toledo, Ohio, was founded in 1948. Describing his Satanic tradition as the Ophite Cultus Sathanas, the group first came to public attention in 1969. The group had a Gnostic doctrine about the world, in which the Judeo-Christian creator god is regarded as evil, and the Biblical serpent is presented as a force for good, who had delivered salvation to humanity in the Garden of Eden. Sloane's claim of a 1940s origin remain unproven: potentially fabricated to make his group appear older than the (1966) establishment of the Church of Satan.
Contemporary tendencies and groups
"The intentional, religiously motivated veneration of Satan" (the "working definition" of Satanism of historian of religion Ruben van Luijk), comes in different forms. Satanism has been called a "new religious movement", and other times judged too diffuse to merit that description and been called instead a "milieu" (Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen), united by "family resemblance", and the fact that most of them were self religions. Some of the resemblances in this Satanic milieu are:
- the positive use of the term Satanist as a designation,
- an emphasis on individualism,
- a genealogy that connects them to other Satanic groups,
- a transgressive and antinomian stance,
- a self-perception as an elite, and
- an embrace of values such as pride, self-reliance, and productive non-conformity.
A minority of Satanists have some type of association with the political far-right.
Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen argue that the groups within the Satanic milieu can be divided into three groups: reactive Satanists, rationalist Satanists, and esoteric Satanists.
- Reactive Satanism (they believe) encompass "popular Satanism, inverted Christianity, and symbolic rebellion" and situates itself in opposition to society while at the same time conforming to society's perspective of evil.
- Rationalist Satanism is used to describe the trend in the Satanic milieu which is atheistic, skeptical, materialistic, and epicurean. According to Joseph Laycock, "most contemporary Satanists" are nontheistic.
- Esoteric Satanism applied to those forms which are theistic and draw upon ideas from other forms of Western esotericism, Modern Paganism, Buddhism, and Hinduism.
Diane E. Taub and Lawrence D. Nelson (publishing in 1993, at the end of the "Satanic panic") divide Satanism into two:
- "Establishment" Satanism, or the "respectable" form of Satanism that is "usually highly visible and structured", and emphasizes its law-abiding nature. (This may include both Rationalist Satanism and Esoteric Satanism.) An example of "Establishment Satanism" is the Church of Satan, which "officially condemns illegal activity". (Other Establishment Satanists are the Church of Satanic Brotherhood or the Temple of Set.) It is the variety of Satanism most studied by academic sociologists, who also represent Satanism in their "discourse" as "harmless, law-abiding alternative religions", ignoring the second type of Satanism ...
- "Underground" Satanism, the Satanism of "reputed criminal elements", and the variety that lay groups and the media tend to focus on (especially during the Satanic Panic of the 1980s). (Satanic Underground may be similar to Reactive Satanism.) Information on the underground is often less than reliable, as reports are sensational and the Satanists themselves are secretive. Establishment and Underground Satanism conflict, the first wanting to preserve its social acceptance and tax-exempt status that the sensational crimes or alleged crimes of the underground put in jeopardy. How much cause and effect there is a between Underground Satanism and crime comes into question because according to at least one report, "nearly worshipping criminal has had a history of anti-social behavior ... long before taking up occult trappings.") On the other hand, evidence of personality disorders does not mean the disorder sufferer does not have sincere Satanic beliefs.
Contemporary religious Satanism is predominantly an American phenomenon but has spread elsewhere via globalization and the Internet, allowing for intra-group communication and creation of a forum for Satanist disputes. Satanism started to reach Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s—in time with the fall of the Communist Bloc—and most noticeably in Poland and Lithuania, predominantly Roman Catholic countries.
Atheistic Satanism
Church of Satan and Anton LaVey
Main articles: LaVeyan Satanism and Church of SatanSatanism as "a self-declared religion" is said (by most scholars of Satanism), to have "truly" begun in 1966 with the founding of the Church of Satan (CoS) by Anton Szandor LaVey. Religious scholars have called the Church not only the oldest, continuous satanic organization (Joseph Laycock), (James R. Lewis), (Asprem, Granholm), (Faxneld and Petersen), but the most influential, with "numerous imitator and breakaway groups" (Laycock), (R. Van Luijk).
Founded in San Francisco, California, in an era when there was much public interest in the occult, witchcraft, and Satanism, the church enjoyed a heyday for several years after its founding, when a "gigantic media circus" developed around "the Father of Satanism" and his Satanic aesthetics—LaVey shaved his head and wore a goatee, performing Black Masses with nude women serving as altars, was invited on national talk shows, and mingled with celebrities attending his satanic parties. As an entrepreneur, he saw an opening for a new religion in the spiritual void of a secularizing post-Christian West.
But LaVey also promoted his ideas, and his 1969 Satanic Bible ("the best-known and most influential statement of Satanic theology" sold nearly a million copies. These had "very little" connection with "either Satan or the worship of Satan", but were based on the Romantic literary concept of Satan, not as a symbol of evil, but as a rebel anti-hero, defying God’s tyranny with charisma and bravery. Together with the romanticism, "humanism, hedonism, aspects of pop psychology and the human potential movement" were woven together by LaVey, and publicized with "a lot of showmanship". Philosopher Ayn Rand, who argued that "selfishness" is a virtue ("unfettered self-interest is good and altruism is destructive"), was a major influence. According to both LaVey and sociologist of religion James R. Lewis, Ayn Rand's thought was a cornerstone of his philosophy (along with "ceremony and ritual" or "ritual magic").
Other influences were Friedrich Nietzsche (who celebrated the Ubermensch, proclaimed "God is dead", and preached against the 'slave's morality' of mercy, charity, and helping the weak); English occultist Aleister Crowley (famous for the axiom "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"); and Arthur Desmond (strongly associated with Social Darwinism and the expression "the survival of the fittest").
LaVey used Christianity as a "negative mirror" for his new faith, rejecting the basic principles, theology and values of Christian belief, along with other major religions and philosophies such as humanitarianism and liberal democracy—which he saw as negative forces. Instead of idealism, humility, abstinence, (self-denigration), obedience, (herd behavior), spirituality, and irrationality; he praised the seven deadly sins (pride, greed, wrath, envy, lust, gluttony and sloth), as virtues not vices. LaVey went beyond discouraging sexual inhibitions and feelings of guilt and shame over fetishes, calling for a celebration of, and indulgence in, humanity's animal nature and its desires, which Christianity sought to suppress. Human beings should seek out the carnal rather than the spiritual; satisfying the ego's desires enhanced an individual's pride, self-respect, and self-realization. Hate, and aggression were necessary and advantageous for survival, victims should not "turn the other cheek" but take an "eye for an eye".
Satanists should be individualistic, non-conformist, contemptuous of "colorless" mainstream society. LaVey saw Satanism as something like a personality type as much as a belief, since Satanists "are outsiders by their nature", and "born, not made". Since gods are actually a creation of man and not the other way around, LaVey asked, "'Why not really be honest and if you are going to create a god in your image, why not create that god as yourself'.... every man is a god if he chooses to recognize himself as one." Not everyone would measure up to being a god however. Human social equality was a "myth", leading to "mediocrity" and support of the weak at the expense of the strong. "Social stratification" was part of LaVey and the Church's "Five Point Program".
A "true Satanic society" was described in Lavey's church's periodical The Black Flame and highlighted by anthropologist Jean La Fontaine; it would be one in which the population consists of "free-spirited, well-armed, fully-conscious, self-disciplined individuals, who will neither need nor tolerate any external entity 'protecting' them or telling them what they can and cannot do". Another version of the Satanic society envisioned by LaVey was the breeding of an elite people "superior" in their creativity and nonconformity. These would live apart from the rest of the human "herd"—who would be relegated into ghettoes, ideally "space ghettoes" located on other planets.
LaVey's ideas were also said to "seem "contradictory" (according to Joseph Laycock). According to one CoS priest (Gavin Baddeley), LaVey's church combined "a love of life garbed in the symbols of death and fear", and while LaVey himself pontificated on personal freedom, he "micromanaged the lives of his followers". Some (Lucien Greaves) doubted his atheist naturalism. LaVey insisted the church scoffed at the supernatural, but also told an interviewer he considered "curses and hexes" against enemies a form of human sacrifice "by proxy".
Contradictions in his thought have been explained by his wanting it to have as wide appeal as possible, balancing (in his words) "nine parts" of "respectability" to "one part" of "outrageousness". If Satanism was to be Satanic, it required some outrageous/anti-social elements, but if it was going to be a viable organization, these could not be allowed to frighten off potential congregants and attract unwanted attention.
One "outrageous" issue that LaVey was criticized for was his "ambivalent relationship" with far-right groups (United Klans of America, National Renaissance Party, and the American Nazi Party) that he neither endorsed nor rejected.
LaVey died in 1997, but the church maintains a purist approach to his thought, insisting he and the church have "codified" Satanism as "a religion and philosophy", and dismisses other Satanist groups (atheistic or otherwise), as reverse-Christians, pseudo-Satanists or Devil worshipers.
The Satanic Temple
Main article: The Satanic TempleThe Satanic Temple (TST), has been called the "most prominent" satanic organization "in terms of both size and public activity" (as of late 2023). Based in Salem, Massachusetts and active since 2012, it claims 700,000 members worldwide. Like the older Church of Satan, its congregants do not believe in a supernatural Satan, but if the CoS saw Satanism as a "negative mirror" of Christianity, reversing Christian principles of altruism (helping the downtrodden and community-mindedness), the Christian principles TST wants to reverse are politically conservative activist ones—the elimination of the right to abortion, the teaching of evolution, the separation of church and state, etc. This "left-wing", "socially engaged Satanism", involves activism, rather than the individualism and right-wing-oriented, "getting what you want for yourself", of the CoS.
They have been called "rationalist, political pranksters" (by Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen), with pranks designed to highlight religious hypocrisy and advance the cause of secularism. One such prank was performing a "Pink Mass" over the grave of the mother of the evangelical Christian and prominent anti-LGBT preacher Fred Phelps and claiming that the mass converted the spirit of Phelps' mother into a lesbian. The "Seven Fundamental" tenets of the temple on its website mention compassion, justice, freedom, inviolability of the human body, conforming to scientific understanding, human fallibility—but say nothing about Satan. The Temple has been described as using the literary Satan as metaphor to promote pragmatic skepticism, rational reciprocity, personal autonomy, and curiosity; and as a symbol to represent "the eternal rebel" against arbitrary authority and social norms.
The temple has also demanded the privileges the government affords Christians, such as giving prayers before city council meetings, erecting (satanic) statues on government property, distributing it is materials in public schools. As the movement became bigger, its congregations volunteered to clean highways and help the homeless, at least in part to demonstrate they were civic minded and not evil. It has made efforts at lobbying, with a focus on the separation of church and state and using satire against Christian groups that it believes interfere with personal freedom.
Lucien Greaves has described the Temple as being a progressive and updated version of LaVey's Satanism, posted a fairly detailed refutation of LaVey's doctrines, accusing the Church of fetishizing authoritarianism, and explaining how elements of Social Darwinism and Nietzscheanism within LaVeyan Satanism are incongruent with game theory, reciprocal altruism, and cognitive science. The Church of Satan, on the other hand, has declared the TST members as only "masquerading" as Satanists, being in violation of the "five decades of a clearly defined belief system called Satanism expounded by a worldwide organization" (i.e. LaVeyan Satanism).
First Satanic Church
Main article: First Satanic ChurchAfter LaVey's death in 1997, the Church of Satan was taken over by a new administration and its headquarters were moved to New York City. LaVey's daughter, the High Priestess Karla LaVey re-founded The First Satanic Church on 1999 in San Francisco. This church has been called "a lot more exclusive" than the original and as of late 2023 was known for producing a "Black X-Mass concert" in San Francisco "every year for the last couple decades".
Theistic Satanism
Theistic Satanism (also known as traditional Satanism, spiritual Satanism or Devil worship) is a form of Satanism with the primary belief that Satan is an actual deity or force to revere or worship. Other characteristics of theistic Satanism may include a belief in magic, which is manipulated through ritual, although that is not a defining criterion, and theistic Satanists may focus solely on devotion.
Temple of Set
Main article: Temple of SetThe Temple of Set (TOS) is an initiatory occult left-hand path religious organization. It was founded in 1975 when Michael Aquino, the founder of a Church of Satan "Grotto" in Louisville, Kentucky, and editor of the Church's newsletter, The Cloven Hoof, left the church, taking 28 members with him. Aquino's anger that LaVey had devalued his high level grade of "magister" in the church may have initiated his break, but Aquino also disagreed with LaVey's materialist philosophy, arguing that while the church might publicly be materialist, Satan as symbol was "only part of the truth". Aquino held a ritual to ask Satan "where to lead" his CoS defectors and, on the night of 21–22 June 1975, Satan allegedly told him to "Reconsecrate my Temple and my Order in the true name of Set. No longer will I accept the bastard title of a Hebrew fiend." Thus Aquino came to believe that the name Satan was a corruption of the name Set, the Egyptian god of darkness. The philosophy of the Temple of Set may be summed up as "enlightened individualism"—enhancement and improvement of oneself by personal education, experiment, and initiation. This process is necessarily different and distinctive for each individual. The members do not agree on whether Set is real or symbolic, and they're not expected to.
The Temple teaches that Set is a real entity, and the only real god in existence, with all other gods being created by the human imagination. Set is described as having given humanity—through the means of non-natural evolution—the "Black Flame" or the "Gift of Set", which is a questioning intellect that sets humans apart from other animals. While Setians are expected to revere Set, they do not worship him. Central to Setian philosophy is the human individual, with self-deification presented as the ultimate goal.
Estimates of the Temple's total are between 300 and 500 as of 2005 (Petersen); and approximately 200 as of 2007 (Granholm). Members must remain active. New members have one year to join a pylon (a Local chapter) and must reach the second degree of adept by showing proficiency in magic within two years, or have their memberships revoked.
Aquino died in July 2020 at the age of 73. High priests after Aquino were Don Webb starting in 1996, Zeena Schreck starting in 2002 (who lasted only six weeks when Aquino took over again), Patricia Hardy starting in 2004.
The "sinister tradition" and the Order of Nine Angles
Main article: Order of Nine AnglesDuring the 1990s, the idea that groups like Church of Satan and Temple of Set were "too benevolent and law-abiding" to be true Satanists grew, particularly among musicians and fans in extreme heavy metal music, where being more extreme meant being more authentic. These antinomian and amoral Satanic (or post-Satanic) groups are sometimes called the "sinister tradition" of Satanism.
The Order of Nine Angles has been called "the ur-type that defines the sinister tradition" and is connected to multiple killings, rapes, and cases of child abuse and right-wing terrorism. According to the group's own claims, the Order of Nine Angles (O9A or ONA) was established in Shropshire, England, during the late 1960s, when a Grand Mistress united a number of ancient pagan groups active in the area. This account states that when the Order's Grand Mistress migrated to Australia, a man known as "Anton Long" took over as the new Grand Master. From 1976 onward, he authored an array of texts for the tradition, codifying and extending its teachings, mythos, and structure. Various academics have argued that Long is the pseudonym of British National Socialist Movement activist David Myatt, (Myatt denies it but Religion scholar Jacob Senholt "copies of ONA documents from 1978 with Myatt’s name on them" have been found and "early ONA texts were published" by a press that "Myatt owned"). The O9A arose to public attention in the early 1980s, spreading its message through magazine articles over the following two decades. In 2000, it established a presence on the internet, later adopting social media to promote its message.
O9A consists largely of secretive, autonomous cells known as "nexions", operating as a network of allied Satanic practitioners, which it terms the "kollective". The majority of these are located in Britain, Ireland, and Germany, although others are located elsewhere in Europe, and in Russia, Egypt, South Africa, Brazil, Australia, and the United States. In recent decades up to 2023, O9A has caught the attention of "white supremacist groups and troubled young men" through its material online, and as of 2013 2,000 people "may be associated with the ONA in one form or another", according to one estimate.
The O9A describe their occultism as "Traditional Satanism". The O9A's writings not only encourage human sacrifice, but insist it is required in Satanism, referring to their victims as opfers. According to the Order's teachings, such opfers must demonstrate character faults that mark them out as being worthy of death. No O9A cell has admitted to carrying out a sacrifice in a ritualized manner, but rather, Order members have joined the police and military to carry out such killings. Faxneld described the Order as "a dangerous and extreme form of Satanism", while religious studies scholar Graham Harvey wrote that the O9A fit the stereotype of the Satanist "better than other groups" by embracing "deeply shocking" and illegal acts. Several British politicians, including the Labour Party's Yvette Cooper, chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, have pushed for the group to be banned as a terror organization, and according to the BBC News, "the authorities are concerned by the number of paedophiles associated with the ONA." Additionally, there are various followers of the O9A paradigm who are (or were) also members of banned militant national-socialist groups, namely the Atomwaffen Division, Combat 18, and Nordic Resistance Movement, the first of which even openly aims to perpetrate terror attacks.
Joy of Satan
Main article: Joy of Satan MinistriesJoy of Satan is a western esoteric occult organization that combines Satanism, the ancient alien astronaut "hypothesis", and antisemitism. It was founded in the early 2000s by Maxine Dietrich (pseudonym of Andrea Maxine Dietrich), wife of the American National Socialist Movement's co-founder and former leader Clifford Herrington. With its inception, spiritual Satanism was born—a current that until recently was regarded only as "theist", but then defined into "Spiritual Satanism" by theistic Satanists who concluded that the term spiritual in Satanism represented the best answer to the world, considering it a "moral slap" toward the earlier carnal and materialistic LaVeyan Satanism, and instead focusing its attention upon spiritual evolution. Joy of Satan presents a unique synthesis of theistic Satanism, Nazism, Gnosticism, Paganism, Western esotericism, UFO conspiracy theories, and extraterrestrial hypotheses similar to those popularized by Zecharia Sitchin and David Icke.
Members of Joy of Satan are generally polytheists, believing that Satan is one of many deities. While Satan and demons are considered deities within JoS, the deities themselves are understood to be highly evolved, un-aging, sentient, and powerful humanoid extraterrestrial beings. Satan and many demons are equated with gods from ancient cultures, some of which include the Sumerian god Enki, and the Yazidi angel Melek Taus being seen as Satan, borrowing their theistic Satanist interpretations of Enki from the writings of Zecharia Sitchin, and Melek Taus partially deriving from the writings of Anton LaVey. Satan is seen not only as an important deity but a powerful and sentient being responsible for the creation of humanity. Satan is also revered by JoS as "the true father and creator God of humanity", the bringer of knowledge, and whose desire is for his creations, humans, to elevate themselves through knowledge and understanding.
In their beliefs, Yazidism (a pre-Islamic religion of about one million members found mainly in northern Iraq, that holds that Melek Taûs/Tawûsî Melek, "the Peacock Angel", is the leader of the archangels and functions as the ruler of the world; but who Muslims believe is a fallen angel), is in juxtaposition with Satanism as they consider the two share similar elements, such as Yazidi devotees being defined by Muslims as "devotees to Shaytan" and regarded as Satanists. It is also believed that the figure of Melek Taus, the peacock angel, may derive from much older pagan deities, such as Saraswati, the Hindu goddess of wisdom who rides a peacock, or even the god Indra, who transforms into a peacock. The story of Melek Taus itself is also considered by JoS to have many satanic elements, such as being described as the angel who rebelled against the Abrahamic god. The sacred text of the Yazidis, the Al-Jilwah, is claimed by the JoS as the word of Satan.
While maintaining some popularity as a theistic Satanist sect, the group has been widely criticized for its association with the National Socialist Movement and its racial anti-Jewish, anti-Judaic, and anti-Christian sentiment, as well as its anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Much of their beliefs on aliens, meditation, and telepathic contacts with demons have become popular in a larger milieu within the currents of recent non-LaVeyan theistic Satanism. According to Petersen's survey (2014), Joy of Satan's angelfire network has a surprising prominence among theistic Satanist websites on the internet. In addition, James R. Lewis's "Satan census" (2009) also revealed a presence of respondents to Joy of Satan.
Luciferianism
Main article: LuciferianismLuciferians reportedly revere Lucifer not as the devil, but as a destroyer, guardian, liberator, light bringer, and/or guiding spirit to darkness, or even as the true god, as opposed to Jehovah. The Greater Church of Lucifer of Houston lost its place of worship in 2017 after vandalism and death threats to its landlord caused him to refuse to renew the church's lease.
Personal Satanism
In contrast to the organized and doctrinal Satanist groups is the personal Satanism of individuals, who identify as Satanists due to their affinity for the general idea of Satan, including such characteristics as viciousness and/or subversion.
Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen used the term reactive Satanism to describe one form of modern Satanism. They described this as an adolescent and anti-social means of rebelling in a Christian society, by which an individual transgresses cultural boundaries. which tends to fall into two tendencies:
- "Satanic tourism"—characterized by the brief period of time in which an individual was involved;
- "Satanic quest"—typified by a longer and deeper involvement.
The researcher Gareth Medway noted that in 1995 he encountered a British woman who stated that she had been a practicing Satanist during her teenage years. She had grown up in a small mining village and had come to believe that she had psychic powers. After hearing about Satanism in some library books, she declared herself a Satanist and formulated a belief that Satan was the true god. After her teenage years she abandoned Satanism and became a chaos magickian.
Some personal Satanists are teenagers or mentally disturbed individuals who have engaged in criminal activities. During the 1980s and 1990s, several groups of teenagers were apprehended after sacrificing animals and vandalizing both churches and graveyards with Satanic imagery. Introvigne stated that these incidents were "more a product of juvenile deviance and marginalization than Satanism". In a few cases, the crimes of these personal Satanists have included murder.
- In 1970, two separate groups of teenagers—one led by Stanley Baker in Big Sur, and the other by Steven Hurd in Los Angeles, killed a total of three people and consumed parts of their corpses in what they later claimed were sacrifices devoted to Satan.
- The American serial killer Richard Ramirez claimed that he was a (theistic) Satanist; during his 1980s killing spree he left an inverted pentagram at the scene of each murder and at his trial called out "Hail Satan!".
- In 1984 on Long Island, a group allegedly called the Knights of the Black Circle killed one of its own members, Gary Lauwers, over a disagreement regarding the group's illegal drug dealing; group members later related that Lauwers' death was a sacrifice to Satan. In particular, self-declared Satanist and alleged member of the Knights of the Black Circle, Ricky "the Acid King" Kasso, became notorious for torturing and murdering Lauwers while attempting to force Lauwers to declare "I love Satan" during the murder.
- Nikolai Ogolobyak, who confessed to being a member of a Satanic cult, was sentenced to 20 years in 2010 for the ritual killing of four teenagers in Russia's Yaroslavl region.
Demographics
A survey in the Encyclopedia of Satanism found that people became involved with Satanism in many diverse ways and were found in many countries. The survey found that more Satanists were raised as Protestant Christians than Catholic.
— Religion scholar and researcher of new religious movements James R. LewisBeginning in the late 1960s, organized Satanism emerged out of the occult subculture with the formation of the Church of Satan. It was not long, however, before Satanism had expanded well beyond the Church of Satan. The decentralization of the Satanist movement was considerably accelerated when Anton LaVey disbanded the grotto system in the mid-1970s. At present, religious Satanism exists primarily as a decentralized subculture Unlike traditional religions, and even unlike the early Satanist bodies such as the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set, contemporary Satanism is, for the most part, a decentralized movement. In the past, this movement has been propagated through the medium of certain popular books, especially LaVey's Satanic Bible. In more recent years, the internet has come to play a significant role in reaching potential "converts", particularly among disaffected young people.
Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen observed that from surveys of Satanists conducted in the early 21st century, it was clear that the Satanic milieu was "heavily dominated by young males". They nevertheless noted that census data from New Zealand suggested that there may be a growing proportion of women becoming Satanists. In comprising more men than women, Satanism differs from most other religious communities, including most new religious communities. Most Satanists came to their religion through reading, either online or books, rather than through being introduced to it through personal contacts. Many practitioners do not claim that they converted to Satanism, but rather state that they were born that way, and only later in life confirmed that Satanism served as an appropriate label for their pre-existing worldviews. Others have stated that they had experiences with supernatural phenomena that led them to embracing Satanism.
The surveys revealed that atheistic Satanists appeared to be in the majority, although the numbers of theistic Satanists appeared to grow over time. Beliefs in the afterlife varied, although the most common beliefs about the afterlife were reincarnation and the idea that consciousness survives bodily death. The surveys also demonstrated that most recorded Satanists practiced magic, although there were differing opinions as to whether magical acts operated according to etheric laws or whether the effect of magic was purely psychological. A number of Satanists described performing cursing, in most cases as a form of vigilante justice. Most practitioners conduct their religious observances in a solitary manner, and never or rarely meet fellow Satanists for rituals. Rather, the primary interaction that takes place between Satanists is online, on websites or via email. From their survey data, Dyrendal, Lewis, and Petersen noted that the average length of involvement in the Satanic milieu was seven years. A Satanist's involvement in the movement tends to peak in their early twenties and drops off sharply in their thirties. A small proportion retain their allegiance to the religion into their elder years. When asked about their ideology, the largest proportion of Satanists identified as apolitical or non-aligned, while only a small percentage identified as conservative. A small minority of Satanists expressed support for Nazism; conversely, over two-thirds expressed opposition or strong opposition to it.
2021 Canadian census
The 2021 Canadian census states that 5,890 Canadians identify as Satanist, representing 0.02% of the population.
Compared to the general population, Satanists are more likely to be male, aged in their 20s or 30s, and not a member of any recognized minority group, although the Japanese are an exception (with the Japanese comprising 0.3% of both Satanists and the population as a whole).
General population | Satanists | ||
---|---|---|---|
Total population | 36,328,480 | 5,890 | |
Gender | Male | 17,937,165 (49.4%) | 3,430 (58.2%) |
Female | 18,391,315 (50.6%) | 2,460 (41.8%) | |
Age | 0 to 14 | 5,992,555 (16.5%) | 175 (3%) |
15 to 19 | 2,003,200 (5.5%) | 210 (3.6%) | |
20 to 24 | 2,177,860 (6%) | 810 (13.8%) | |
25 to 34 | 4,898,625 (13.5%) | 2,755 (46.8%) | |
35 to 44 | 4,872,425 (13.4%) | 1,250 (21.2%) | |
45 to 54 | 4,634,850 (12.8%) | 470 (8%) | |
55 to 64 | 5,162,365 (14.2%) | 165 (2.8%) | |
65 and over | 6,586,600 (18.1%) | 60 (1%) | |
Minority status | Non-minority | 26,689,275 (73.5%) | 5,480 (93%) |
South Asian | 2,571,400 (7%) | 40 (0.7%) | |
Chinese | 1,715,770 (4.7%) | 50 (0.9%) | |
Black | 1,547,870 (4.3%) | 100 (1.7%) | |
Filipino | 957,355 (2.6%) | 35 (0.6%) | |
Arab | 694,015 (1.9%) | 25 (0.4%) | |
Latin American | 580,235 (1.6%) | 55 (0.9%) | |
Southeast Asian | 390,340 (1.1%) | 20 (0.3%) | |
West Asian | 360,495 (1%) | 0 (0%) | |
Korean | 218,140 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
Japanese | 98,890 (0.3%) | 15 (0.3%) | |
Visible minority, n.i.e. | 172,885 (0.5%) | 20 (0.3%) | |
Multiple visible minorities | 331,805 (0.9%) | 50 (0.8%) |
Legal recognition
In 2004, it was claimed that Satanism was allowed in the Royal Navy of the British Armed Forces, despite opposition from Christians. In 2016, under a Freedom of Information request, the Navy Command Headquarters stated that, "we do not recognise satanism as a formal religion, and will not grant facilities or make specific time available for individual 'worship'."
In 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States debated in the case of Cutter v. Wilkinson over protecting minority religious rights of prison inmates after a lawsuit challenging the issue was filed to them. The court ruled that facilities that accept federal funds cannot deny prisoners accommodations that are necessary to engage in activities for the practice of their own religious beliefs.
In 2019, The Satanic Temple was granted religious IRS 501(c)(3) status.
Metal and rock music
During the 1960s and 1970s, several rock bands— namely the American band Coven and the British band Black Widow, employed the imagery of Satanism and witchcraft in their work. References to Satan also appeared in the work of those rock bands which were pioneering the heavy metal genre in Britain during the 1970s. For example, the band Black Sabbath made mention of Satan in their lyrics, although some of the band's members were practicing Christians, and other lyrics affirmed the power of the Christian god over Satan. In the 1980s, greater use of Satanic imagery was made by heavy metal bands such as Slayer, Kreator, Sodom, and Destruction. Bands active in the subgenre of death metal—among them Morbid Angel and Entombed, also adopted Satanic imagery, combining it with other morbid and dark imagery, such as that of zombies and serial killers.
Satanism would come to be more closely associated with the subgenre of black metal, in which it was foregrounded over the other themes that had been used in death metal. A number of black metal performers incorporated self-injury into their act, framing this as a manifestation of Satanic devotion. The first black metal band, Venom, proclaimed themselves to be Satanists, although this was more an act of provocation than an expression of genuine devotion to the Devil. Satanic themes were also used by the black metal bands Bathory and Hellhammer. However, the first black metal act to more seriously adopt Satanism was Mercyful Fate, whose vocalist, King Diamond, joined the Church of Satan. More often than not musicians associating themselves with black metal say they do not believe in legitimate Satanic ideology and often profess to being atheists, agnostics, or religious skeptics.
In contrast to King Diamond, various black metal Satanists sought to distance themselves from LaVeyan Satanism, for instance by referring to their beliefs as "devil worship". These individuals regarded Satan as a literal entity, and in contrast to Anton LaVey, they associated Satanism with criminality, suicide, and terror. For them, Christianity was regarded as a plague which required eradication. Many of these individuals, most prominently Varg Vikernes and Euronymous, were involved in the early Norwegian black metal scene. Between 1992 and 1996, such people destroyed around fifty Norwegian churches in arson attacks. Within the black metal scene, a number of musicians later replaced Satanic themes with those deriving from Heathenry, a form of modern Paganism.
See also
References
Notes
- Satan in Judaism and Islam.
- While most Jews do not believe in the existence of a supernatural omnimalevolent figure, it is "sometimes understood" in Judaism (according to the Britannica), that Satan is a figure whose role as adversary is not "antithetical" to God but acting as a sort of "divine prosecutor" for the Supreme Being, as in the case of Job.
- In Islam shayāṭīn (with consonantal roots similar to Satan) is the collective term for devils, while it is Iblis who is the leader of the devils. Like Satan in Christianity Iblis was cast down from heaven for his pride and disobedience, unlike Satan, (at least in some versions) Iblis is a jinn not an angel.
- For example the Temple of Set, despite being a splinter group of the Church of Satan, venerates the deity Set, considering Set to be the true name of Satan.
- An abstract of Lyon's book appeared on US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs web page.
- In the 19th century, Charles Baudelaire (and others with variations of the wording) was quoted saying, "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."
- "The Church of Satan's Policy on Politics" is that the Church has no "'official' political position". "Politics are up to each individual member", and those members embrace all sorts of different ideologies (it then lists every conceivable ideology including Communism and Socialism), but most members will "support political candidates and movements whose goals reflect their own practical needs and desires". It also describes "the emotional drive to 'change the world'" as a "common stage of early adult development typically beginning around age 16 and lasting until around age 24". Elsewhere however, Church writings argue for things not at all consistent with any leftward or even centrist politics. According to Ruben van Luijk and Amina Lap, LaVey thought eugenics could and should be part of the human future, leading to the breeding of an elite reflecting LaVey's "Satanic" principles, who would come to power, and then hopefully relegate the rest of the human "herd" into ghettoes, ideally "space ghettoes" located on other planets.
Footnotes
- Petersen 2004, pp. 444–446. sfn error: no target: CITEREFPetersen2004 (help)
- ^ White, Ethan Doyle (December 14, 2023). "History & Society. Satanism, occult practice". Britannica. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
- Glustrom 1989, pp. 22–24. sfn error: no target: CITEREFGlustrom1989 (help)
- Awn, Peter J. (1983). "Mythic Biography". Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblīs in Sufi Psychology. Numen Book Series. Vol. 44. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 18–56. doi:10.1163/9789004378636_003. ISBN 978-90-04-37863-6.
- Mahmoud, Muhammad (1995). "The Creation Story in 'Sūrat al-Baqara', with Special Reference to al-Ṭabarī's Material: An Analysis". Journal of Arabic Literature. 26 (1/2): 201–214. doi:10.1163/157006495X00175. ISSN 0085-2376. JSTOR 4183374.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 2023: section 1. What Is Satan?
- Thurston 2001. p. 79.
- Levack, Brian P. (2006). "Chapter 7". The Witch-hunt in Early Modern Europe. Pearson Longman. ISBN 978-0-582-41901-8.
- ^ Medway 2001, p. 257; van Luijk 2016, p. 2.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 35.
- ^ Abrams, Joe (Spring 2006). Wyman, Kelly (ed.). "The Religious Movements Homepage Project – Satanism: An Introduction". virginia.edu. University of Virginia. Archived from the original on August 29, 2006. Retrieved January 1, 2021.
- Gilmore, Peter (August 10, 2007). "Science and Satanism". Point of Inquiry Interview. Retrieved December 9, 2013.
- ^ Petersen 2009a.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 13–14.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 14.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 16.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 15.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 19.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 20.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 18.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 21.
- Gruszczyńska-Ziółkowska, Anna (1995). El poder del sonido: el papel de las crónicas españolas en la etnomusicología andina (in Spanish). Ecuador: Ediciones Abya-Yala. p. 107. ISBN 9978-04-147-8.
- Medway 2001, p. 51; van Luijk 2016, p. 19.
- Medway 2001, p. 51.
- Medway 2001, p. 52.
- Medway 2001, p. 53.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 21–22.
- R. van Luijk, Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism Chapter 1, The Christian Invention of Satanism, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), abstract
- ^ Medway 2001, p. 9.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 2.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 44.
- R. van Luijk, Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 5.
- P. Faxneld, Satanic Feminism: Lucifer As the Liberator of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 25.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 1981: section 1. What Is Satanism? Anton LaVey and the Invention of Satanism
- Introvigne 2016, p. 3.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 1981: 5 The Temple of Set and Esoteric Satanism.Amoral Groups and the Order of Nine Angles
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 1981: section 3 Satanic Sympathizers. Satan and Esotericism
- van Luijk 2016, p. 16.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 7.
- Gallagher 2006, p. 151.
- Granholm, Kennet (November 2012). "10. The Left-Hand Path and Post-Satanism: The Temple of Set and the Evolution of Satanism". In Petersen, Jesper Aa.; Faxneld, Per (eds.). The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity. Oxford University Press. pp. 209–228. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- Carlson & Larue 1989, p. 11.
- ^ Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 525.
- Lyons, Arthur. (1988). Satan Wants You: The Cult of Devil Worship in America. Mysterious Press. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
- Carter, Joe (June 8, 2011). "THE FOUNTAINHEAD OF SATANISM". First Things. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
- "The Greatest Trick the Devil Ever Pulled Was Convincing the World He Didn't Exist". Quote Investigator. March 20, 2018. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
- B. Ellis, Aliens, ‘’Ghosts, and Cults: Legends We Live’’ (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2003).
- van Luijk 2016, p. 23.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 24.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 24–26.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 25–26.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 25.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 28.
- Medway 2001, p. 126.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 28–29.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 29–31.
- Medway 2001, p. 57.
- Medway 2001, p. 58.
- Medway 2001, pp. 57–58.
- Medway 2001, pp. 60–63.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 36.
- Medway 2001, p. 133; van Luijk 2016, p. 37.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 38.
- Medway 2001, p. 70.
- Oldridge, Darren (2012). The Devil, a Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 39.
- Scarre & Callow 2001, p. 2.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 1981: Chapter 2, Imagining the Black Mass. The Affair of the Poisons
- Oldridge, Darren (2012). The Devil, a Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 41.
- ^ Oldridge, Darren (2012). The Devil, a Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 43.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 58–59; van Luijk 2016, p. 66.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 66–67.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 66.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 60–61.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 71.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 71–73.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 74–78.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 84–85.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 85–86.
- "The Confession of Leo Taxil". April 25, 1897. Archived from the original on May 13, 2008. Retrieved October 25, 2007.
- National Magazine, an Illustrated American Monthly, Volume XXIV: April – September 1906, pages 228 and 229
- Medway 2001, pp. 266–267.
- Medway 2001, pp. 141–142.
- Medway 2001, pp. 143–149.
- Medway 2001, pp. 159–161.
- Medway 2001, pp. 164–170.
- Medway 2001, p. 161.
- Medway 2001, pp. 262–263; Introvigne 2016, p. 66.
- ^ La Fontaine 2016, p. 13.
- ^ La Fontaine 2016, p. 15.
- La Fontaine 2016, p. 13; Introvigne 2016, p. 381.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 372.
- Medway 2001, pp. 175–177; Introvigne 2016, pp. 374–376.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 115–116.
- Medway 2001, pp. 178–183; Introvigne 2016, pp. 405–406.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 116–120.
- Medway 2001, p. 183.
- La Fontaine 2016, p. 16.
- Medway 2001, p. 369; La Fontaine 2016, p. 15.
- Medway 2001, pp. 191–195.
- Medway 2001, pp. 220–221.
- Medway 2001, pp. 234–248.
- Medway 2001, pp. 210–211.
- ^ Medway 2001, p. 213.
- Medway 2001, p. 249.
- La Fontaine 2016, pp. 13–14.
- Medway 2001, p. 118; La Fontaine 2016, p. 14.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 456.
- Ross, A. 1994. "Blame it on the Devil". Redbook June 1994, p.88
- ^ 213 W. Kaminer, Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials: The Rise of Irrationalism and Perils of Piety (New York: Vintage Books, 1999), p. 193.
- Ross, A. 1994. "Blame it on the Devil". Redbook June: 86–89. 110, 114, 1
- Martineau, Paris (December 19, 2017). "The Storm Is the New Pizzagate – Only Worse". New York. ISSN 0028-7369. Retrieved March 26, 2018.
- Rothschild 2021, p. 21.
- Rothschild 2021, pp. 9, 28, 175.
- Guglielmi, Giorgia (October 28, 2020). "The next-generation bots interfering with the US election". Nature. 587 (7832): 21. Bibcode:2020Natur.587...21G. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03034-5. PMID 33116324.
- Bracewell, Lorna (January 21, 2021). "Gender, Populism, and the QAnon Conspiracy Movement". Frontiers in Sociology. 5. Cardiff, England: Frontiers Media: 615727. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2020.615727. ISSN 2297-7775. PMC 8022489. PMID 33869533. S2CID 231654586.
- Crossley, James (September 2021). "The Apocalypse and Political Discourse in an Age of COVID". Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 44 (1). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications: 93–111. doi:10.1177/0142064X211025464. ISSN 1745-5294. S2CID 237329082.
- Dickey, Colin (August 16, 2023). "From Sound of Freedom to Ron DeSantis: how QAnon's crazy conspiracy theories went mainstream". The Guardian. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 29.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 28.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 28; van Luijk 2016, p. 70.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 28, 30.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 30.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 73.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 1981: chapter 1. What Is Satanism? Anton LaVey and the Invention of Satanism
- Manuel, M. (July 23, 2010). "Seventeenth-century Critics and Biographers of Milton – M. Manuel – Google Books". Retrieved October 8, 2022.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 28, 30; van Luijk 2016, pp. 69–70.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 70.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 108.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 69.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 31.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 71–72.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 97–98.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 74–75.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 105–107.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 77–79.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 117–119.
- van Luijk 2016, pp. 119–120.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 120.
- Petersen 2005, pp. 444–446.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 44–45.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 107.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 37.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 37–38.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 38.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 36.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 39.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 227.
- Lewis, James R. (March 2001). The Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religions – Google Books. Prometheus Books. ISBN 9781615927388. Retrieved September 14, 2022.
- Hutton 1999, p. 175; Dyrendal 2012, pp. 369–370.
- Hutton 1999, p. 175.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 42.
- ^ Medway 2001, p. 18.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 43–44.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 45.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 277.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 49–50.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 278.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 280.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 50.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 3; Introvigne 2016, p. 517.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 4.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 7–9.
- "The Nazi Satanists promoting extreme violence and terrorism | openDemocracy".
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 5.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 6.
- Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 528.
- Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 535.
- ^ Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 523.
- Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 536.
- Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 523, 525.
- Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 531.
- ^ Carlson & Larue 1989.
- Hicks, Robert D., 1991. In Pursuit of Satan: The Police and the Occult, Buffalo: Prometheus Book.
- Richardson, James T., "Satanism in the Courts: From Murder to Heavy Metal." pp. 205–217 in The Satanism Scare, edited by James T. Richardson, Joel Best, and David G. Bromley. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Carlson, Shawn and Gerald Larue. 1989. Satanism in America: How the Devil Got Much More Than His Due. El Cerrito, CA: Gaia, p.v. Quoted in ...
- Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 532.
- Taub & Nelson 1993.
- Alisauskiene 2009.
- "Satanism stalks Poland". BBC News. June 5, 2000.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 1981: section 4 The Church of Satan.
- Lewis 2001, p. 5.
- Asprem & Granholm 2014, p. 75.
- Faxneld & Petersen 2013, p. 81.
- R. van Luijk, Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 305.
- Andrade, Gabriel (December 23, 2020). "A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives". Irish Theological Quarterly. 86 (1): 50–62. doi:10.1177/0021140020977656. S2CID 232040703. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 2023: section 4. The Church of Satan. From the Magic Circle to the Church of Satan
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 2023: section 4 The Church of Satan. LaVey's Satanism
- Petersen 2009, p. 91.
- Andrade, Gabriel (December 23, 2020). "A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives. Satan according to LaVey". Irish Theological Quarterly. 86 (1). doi:10.1177/0021140020977656. S2CID 232040703. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
- Bromley 2005, pp. 8127–8128.
- ^ WELTON, BENJAMIN (October 15, 2014). "Friedrich Nietzsche and Ayn Rand's Influence on Satanism". The Airship. Retrieved January 20, 2024.
- Andrade, Gabriel (December 23, 2020). "A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives. Satan according to LaVey". Irish Theological Quarterly. 86 (1). doi:10.1177/0021140020977656. S2CID 232040703. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
JPLS2023:sect.4-LaVey's
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - Rand, Ayn (1964). The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism. New York: New American Library.
- Cummins, Denise (February 16, 2016). "Column: This is what happens when you take Ayn Rand seriously". PBS News Hour. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
- Lewis 2001a, p. 18 sfnm error: no target: CITEREFLewis2001a (help); Lewis 2002, p. 9.
- Lewis 2002, p. 2.
- Andrade, Gabriel (December 23, 2020). "A Girardian Approach to LaVeyan Satanism: Theological Perspectives". Irish Theological Quarterly. 86 (1): 57. doi:10.1177/0021140020977656. S2CID 232040703. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
- ^ Schipper 2010, p. 109.
- ^ La Fontaine 1999, p. 96.
- Faxneld & Petersen 2013, p. 80.
- Gardell 2003, p. 288; Schipper 2010, p. 107.
- LaVey, Anton |Satanic Bible, –BOOK OF LUCIFER–, chapter III, "Some Evidence of a New Satanic Age"
- Lap 2013, p. 91.
- Faxneld & Petersen 2014, p. 169. sfn error: no target: CITEREFFaxneldPetersen2014 (help)
- Lewis 2001b, p. 50.
- Lap 2013, p. 92.
- Lap 2013, p. 94.
- Gospel of Matthew chapter 5, the Sermon on the Mount in the New Testament
- Gardell 2003, p. 289.
- ^ Dyrendal 2013, p. 129.
- Petersen 2009a, p. 9.
- Satanic Bible by LaVey, p.96, quoted in ...
- Gardell 2003, p. 289; van Luijk 2016, p. 366.
- La Fontaine 1999, p. 97; Lap 2013, p. 95; van Luijk 2016, p. 367.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 366.
- LaVey, Anton Szandor (1988). "Pentagonal Revisionism: A Five-Point Program by Anton Szandor LaVey". Church of Satan. Retrieved January 22, 2024.
- La Fontaine 1999, p. 97.
- van Luijk 2016, p. 376.
- ^ van Luijk 2016, p. 375.
- G. Baddeley, ‘’Lucifer Rising’’ (London: Plexus, 1999), p. 67
- Andrade, Gabriel (2018). "Anton Lavey's Satanic Philosophy: An Analysis". Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies. 9 (1): 34.
- ^ Greaves, Lucien (c. 2019). "Church of Satan vs. Satanic Temple". The Satanic Temple. Retrieved January 11, 2024.
- Taub & Nelson 1993, p. 529.
- R. H. Alfred, "The Church of Satan." in J. R. Lewis and J. A. Petersen (eds.), The Encyclopedic Sourcebook of Satanism (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2008), pp. 478–502 (p. 485).
- Laycock, Satanism, 2023: section 4. The Church of Satan. The Rise and Fall of Anton LaVey
- "Evil, Anyone?" Newsweek (16 August 1971), p. 56.
- Lewis 2002, p. 5.
- ^ Ethan, Joel. "The Satanic Temple Fact Sheet". Church of Satan. Retrieved January 11, 2024.
- Ohlheiser, Abby (November 7, 2014). "The Church of Satan wants you to stop calling these 'devil worshiping' alleged murderers Satanists". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 19, 2015.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 2023: 7 Contemporary Developments in Satanism
- TST. "New milestone: over 700,000 members!". TST. Retrieved January 23, 2023.
- Romero, Dennis (April 25, 2023). "SatanCon, poking at religion and government, opens this weekend in Boston". NBC News. NBC UNIVERSAL. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
- J. P. Laycock, Speak of the Devil: How the Satanic Temple Is Changing the Way We Talk about Religion (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)
- van Luijk 2016, p. 326.
- ^ "The Church of Satan's Policy on Politics". Church of Satan. Retrieved January 7, 2023.
- Lap 2013, p. 95; van Luijk 2016, p. 376.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 219.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 220.
- "There are Seven FUNDAMENTAL TENETS". THE SATANIC TEMPLE. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
- Laycock, Satanism, 2023: 7. Contemporary Developments in Satanism. The Satanic Temple.
- ^ Oppenheimer, Mark (July 10, 2015). "A Mischievous Thorn in the Side of Conservative Christianity". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved July 11, 2015.
- "FAQ". TST. Retrieved December 2, 2015.
- "What does Satan mean to the Satanic Temple? – CNN". CNN. Retrieved December 2, 2015.
- Massoud Hayoun (December 8, 2013). "Group aims to put 'Satanist' monument near Oklahoma capitol | Al Jazeera America". Al Jazeera. Retrieved March 25, 2014.
- "Satanists petition to build monument on Oklahoma state capitol grounds | Washington Times Communities". The Washington Times. December 9, 2013. Retrieved March 25, 2014.
- ^ Bugbee, Shane (July 30, 2013). "Unmasking Lucien Greaves, Leader of the Satanic Temple | VICE United States". Vice.com. Retrieved March 25, 2014.
- "FAQ". After School Satan. Archived from the original on January 16, 2017. Retrieved November 29, 2018.
- Satanic Temple Founder Talks Atheistic Religion. The David Pakman Show. October 9, 2014. Retrieved November 29, 2018.
- "Third Side Intelligence: Missouri Abortions". Church of Satan. October 10, 2017. Retrieved November 29, 2018.
- Larson, Erik (March 22, 2021). "Satanists Go to Court Seeking Right to Pray at City Meetings". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved March 28, 2021.
- Font, Amanda (October 20, 2023). "How the Church of Satan Was Born in San Francisco". KQED. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
- Partridge, Christopher (2004). The Re-Enchantment of the West: Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occulture. Vol. 1. London: T&T Clark. p. 82. ISBN 0-567-08269-5.
- Aquino, Michael (2002). Church of Satan (PDF). San Francisco: Temple of Set. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 12, 2007.
- Boulware, "A Devil of a Time"; Lyons, Satan Wants You, p. 126.
- ^ Laycock, Satanism, 1981: 5 The Temple of Set and Esoteric Satanism.The Temple of Set
- Gardell 2003, p. 390.
- Harvey 2009.
- Petersen 2005, p. 436; Harvey 2009, p. 32.
- Granholm 2009, pp. 93–94; Granholm 2013, p. 218.
- La Fontaine 1999, p. 102; Gardell 2003, p. 291; Petersen 2005, p. 436.
- Granholm 2009, p. 94.
- Faxneld & Petersen 2013a, p. 7.
- Petersen 2005, p. 435.
- Granholm 2009, p. 93; Granholm 2013, p. 223.
- ^ "A Nazi-satanist cult is fuelling far-right groups". New Statesman. March 4, 2020. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
- ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 218; Senholt 2013, p. 256.
- Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 218; Senholt 2013, p. 256; Monette 2013, p. 87.
- Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 216; Senholt 2013, p. 268; Faxneld 2013, p. 207.
- Senholt, "The Sinister Tradition," pp. 47–8
- Ryan 2003, p. 53; Senholt 2013, p. 267.
- Gardell 2003, p. 293.
- ^ Senholt 2013, p. 256.
- Monette 2013, p. 107.
- Kaplan 2000, p. 236.
- ^ Monette 2013, p. 88.
- Monette, Mysticism in the 21st Century, p. 89.
- Faxneld 2013, p. 207; Faxneld 2014, p. 88; Senholt 2013, p. 250; Sieg 2013, p. 252.
- Goodrick-Clarke 2003, pp. 218–219; Baddeley 2010, p. 155.
- Goodrick-Clarke 2003, p. 219.
- Kaplan 2000, p. 237; Ryan 2003, p. 54.
- Harvey 1995, p. 292; Kaplan 2000, p. 237.
- Monette 2013, p. 114.
- Faxneld 2013, p. 207.
- Harvey 1995, p. 292.
-
- "State of Hate 2020" (PDF). Hope not Hate. March 9, 2020.
Over the last 12 months four nazis convicted of terrorist offences have been linked to O9A, and there are two more cases pending.
- "Order of Nine Angles: What is this obscure Nazi Satanist group?". BBC News. June 29, 2020.
The Sonnenkrieg Division, with its glorification of sexual violence, highlights another disturbing theme relating to the ONA – sexual offending as a way of undermining social norms....The authorities are concerned by the number of paedophiles associated with the ONA, taking the group into a different area of law enforcement activity.
- "High Wycombe neo-Nazi Jacek Tchorzewski jailed for terror offences". BBC News. September 20, 2019.
The satanist text demonstrated a "marked fixation with blood, the sexualisation of violence, a paedophilic projection of adult sexuality onto children, and with achieving National Socialist political goals through political violence and acts of terrorism".
- "UK Nazi Satanist group should be outlawed, campaigners urge". BBC News. July 16, 2020.
ONA's Nazi-Satanist ideology, a supernatural worldview that encourages the disruption of society through violence, criminality and sexual offending.
- "State of Hate 2020" (PDF). Hope not Hate. March 9, 2020.
- "Order of Nine Angles". Counter Extremism Project.
One piece of propaganda the group produced is called The Rape Anthology, a collection of ONA writings praising Hitler, Satan, and rape, while employing Islamic terminology and demonizing Jews and minorities. Some of the essays suggest that rape is necessary for the ascension of the Ubermensch.
- "'Random' Murder of Muslim Man Linked to 'Neo-Nazi Death Cult': Report". September 30, 2020.
- Laycock, Satanism, 1981: 5 The Temple of Set and Esoteric Satanism. Other Esoteric Groups
- Asprem & Granholm 2014, pp. 144–146.
- ^ Petersen, Jesper (August 27–29, 2012). "Bracketing Beelzebub: Satanism studies and/as boundary work". ContERN. Retrieved January 25, 2021.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, pp. 370–371.
- ^ Twilight, Jennifer (January 25, 2021). "Analysis on the Joy of Satan". Italian Satanist Union. Retrieved January 25, 2021.
- ^ McBride, Jaemes (2013). The Divine Province: Birthing New Earth. Ed Rychkun. p. 84. ISBN 978-1927066034.
- ^ ATLANTA, J.F. (January 9, 2014). "What do Satanists believe?". The Economist. Retrieved January 25, 2021.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 144–232.
- Paniccia, Enrico (January 17, 2021). "The dark side of Christianity". Consul Press. Retrieved January 25, 2021.
- "Satanism". HISTORY. September 27, 2019. Retrieved January 25, 2021.
- Petersen, Jesper (2011). Between Darwin and the Devil: Modern Satanism as Discourse, Milieu, and Self. NTNU-trykk. pp. 218–219, 144–146. ISBN 978-82-471-3052-0.
- Holt, Cimminnee (August 2012). Satanists and Scholars: A Historiographic Overview and Critique of Scholarship on Religious Satanism (PDF) (Thesis). p. 87 – via Spectrum Library.
- ^ Spence, L. (1993). An Encyclopedia of Occultism. Carol Publishing.
- Michelle Belanger (2007). Vampires in Their Own Words: An Anthology of Vampire Voices. Llewellyn Worldwide. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-7387-1220-8.
- Blakinger, Keri (April 23, 2017). "LIFESTYLE // HOUSTON BELIEF. Exorcised: Luciferian church looks to start anew after harassment". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
- Medway 2001, pp. 362–365.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 130.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 445.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 446.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 122.
- Breskin, David (November 22, 1984). "Cult Killing: Kids in the Dark". Rolling Stone.
- "Russian Satanist Jailed for Ritual Murders Released After Fighting in Ukraine". The Moscow Times. November 21, 2023.
- Lewis, James. Encyclopedia of Satanism. Lulu.com. ISBN 9781312360211.
- ^ Lewis, James R. (August 2001b). "Who Serves Satan? A Demographic and Ideological Profile". Marburg Journal of Religion. 6 (2). University of Marburg: 1–25. doi:10.17192/mjr.2001.6.3748. ISSN 1612-2941. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 138.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 158.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 146.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 142.
- ^ Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 143.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 179–180.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 525–527.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 181–182.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 183.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 209.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 210–212.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, pp. 151, 153.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 153.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 157.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 159.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 160.
- Dyrendal, Lewis & Petersen 2016, p. 171.
- ^ Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (October 26, 2022). "Religion by visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts". www150.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved December 31, 2022.
- Royal Navy to allow devil worship CNN
- Carter, Helen. The devil and the deep blue sea: Navy gives blessing to sailor Satanist. The Guardian
- Navy approves first ever Satanist BBC News
- Ministry of Defence Request for Information. Navy Command FOI Section, 7 January 2016.
- Linda Greenhouse (March 22, 2005). "Inmates Who Follow Satanism and Wicca Find Unlikely Ally". The New York Times.
- "Before high court: law that allows for religious rights". The Christian Science Monitor. March 21, 2005.
- Johnson, M. Alex (May 31, 2005). "Court upholds prisoners' religious rights". MSNBC. Retrieved August 26, 2016.
- "Cutter v. Wilkinson 544 U.S. 709 (2005)". Oyez. Retrieved October 7, 2013.
- "The Satanic Temple is a real religion, says IRS". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved January 23, 2023.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 462–463.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 467.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 467–468.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 468.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 468–469.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 469.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 470.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 472–473.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 471.
- "Death to False Satanism | NOISEY". NOISEY. October 29, 2014. Retrieved March 8, 2016.
- ^ Introvigne 2016, p. 480.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 479.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 482.
- Dyrendal 2016, pp. 481–488.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 479–481.
- Introvigne 2016, p. 481.
- Introvigne 2016, pp. 503–504.
Sources
- Alisauskiene, Milda. "The Peculiarities of Lithuanian Satanism". In Petersen (2009).
- Asprem, Egil; Granholm, Kennet (2013). Contemporary Esotericism. Durham: Acumen. ISBN 978-1-908049-32-2.
- ——— ——— (2014). Contemporary Esotericism. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-54357-2.
- Baddeley, Gavin (2010). Lucifer Rising: Sin, Devil Worship & Rock n' Roll (third ed.). London: Plexus Publishing. ISBN 978-0-85965-455-5.
- Bromley, David G. (2005). "Satanism". In Lindsay Jones (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 12 (2 ed.). Detroit, IL: Macmillan Reference USA.
- Carlson, Shawn; Larue, Gerald (1989). Satanism in America: How the Devil Got Much More Than His Due. El Cerrito, CA: Gaia. pp. 523–541.
- Cavaglion, Gabriel; Sela-Shayovitz, Revital (December 2005). "The Cultural Construction of Contemporary Satanic Legends in Israel". Folklore. 116 (3): 255–271. doi:10.1080/00155870500282701. S2CID 161360139.
- Drury, Nevill (2003). Magic and Witchcraft: From Shamanism to the Technopagans. London: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 978-0500511404.
- Dyrendal, Asbjørn (2012). "Satan and the Beast: The Influence of Aleister Crowley on Modern Satanism". In Henrik Bogdan; Martin P. Starr (eds.). Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 369–394. ISBN 978-0-19-986309-9.
- ——— . "Hidden Persuaders and Invisible Wars: Anton LaVey and Conspiracy Culture". In Faxneld & Petersen (2013), pp. 123–140.
- ——— (2016). "Satanism in Norway". In Bogdan, Henrik; Hammer, Olav (eds.). Western Esotericism in Scandinavia. Brill Esotericism Reference Library. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 481–488. doi:10.1163/9789004325968_062. ISBN 978-90-04-30241-9. ISSN 2468-3566.
- ——— Lewis, James R.; Petersen, Jesper Aa. (2016). The Invention of Satanism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195181104.
- Faxneld, Per. "Post-Satanism, Left-Hand Paths, and Beyond: Visiting the Margins". In Faxneld & Petersen (2013), pp. 205–208.
- ——— . "Secret Lineages and De Facto Satanists: Anton LaVey's Use of Esoteric Tradition". In Asprem & Granholm (2014), pp. 72–90.
- ——— ; Petersen, Jesper Aagaard (2013a). "Introduction: At the Devil's Crossroads". In Faxneld & Petersen (2013), pp. 3–18.
- ——— ——— , eds. (2013). The Devil's Party: Satanism in Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-977924-6.
- Gallagher, Eugene V. (2005). "New Religious Movements: Scriptures of New Religious Movements". In Lindsay Jones (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 12 (2 ed.). Detroit, IL: Macmillan Reference USA.
- ——— (2006). "Satanism and the Church of Satan". Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America. Eugene V. Gallagher, W. Michael Ashcraft (editors). Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood Press. pp. 151–168. ISBN 978-0313050787.
- Gardell, Matthias (2003). Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism. Durham and London: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-3071-4.
- Goodrick-Clarke, Nicholas (2003). Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the Politics of Identity. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 978-0-8147-3155-0.
- Granholm, Kennet. "Embracing Others than Satan: The Multiple Princes of Darkness in the Left-Hand Path Milieu". In Petersen (2009), pp. 85–101.
- ——— . "The Left-Hand Path and Post-Satanism: The Temple of Set and the Evolution of Satanism". In Faxneld & Petersen (2013), pp. 209–228.
- Harvey, Graham (1995). "Satanism in Britain Today". Journal of Contemporary Religion. 10 (3). Routledge: 283–296. doi:10.1080/13537909508580747.
- ——— . "Satanism: Performing Alterity and Othering". In Petersen (2009), pp. 27–40.
- Hutton, Ronald (1999). The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1928-5449-0.
- Introvigne, Massimo (2016). Satanism: A Social History. Aries Book Series: Texts and Studies in Western Esotericism. Vol. 21. Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-28828-7. OCLC 1030572947.
- Kaplan, Jeffrey (2000). "Order of Nine Angles". Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right. Jeffrey Kaplan (editor). Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press. pp. 235–238. ISBN 978-0-7425-0340-3.
- La Fontaine, Jean (1999). "Satanism and Satanic Mythology". In Bengt Ankarloo; Stuart Clark (eds.). Witchcraft and Magic in Europe. Vol. 6: The Twentieth Century. London: Athlone. pp. 81–140. ISBN 0-485-89006-2.
- ——— (2016). Witches and Demons: A Comparative Perspective on Witchcraft and Satanism. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-78533-085-8.
- Lap, Amina Olander. "Categorizing Modern Satanism: An Analysis of LaVey's Early Writings". In Faxneld & Petersen (2013), pp. 83–102.
- LaVey, Anton Szandor (2005) . The Satanic Bible. New York: Avon Books. ISBN 978-0-380-01539-9.
- Laycock, Joseph P. (2023). Satanism. Elements in New Religious Movements (online ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781009057349.
- Lewis, James R. (2001). Satanism Today: An Encyclopedia of Religion, Folklore, and Popular Culture. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-292-9.
- ——— (September 2002). "Diabolical Authority: Anton LaVey, The Satanic Bible and the Satanist "Tradition"". Marburg Journal of Religion. 7 (1): 1–16.
- ——— (2003). Legitimating New Religions. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-3534-0.
- ——— Petersen, Jesper Aagaard, eds. (2005). Controversial New Religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515683-6.
- ——— ——— , eds. (2014). Controversial New Religions (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-931530-7.
- Maxwell-Stuart, P. G. (2011). Satan: A Biography. Stroud: Amberley. ISBN 978-1-4456-0575-3.
- Medway, Gareth J. (2001). Lure of the Sinister: The Unnatural History of Satanism. London and New York: New York University Press. ISBN 9780814756454.
- Monette, Connell (2013). Mysticism in the 21st Century. Wilsonville, Oregon: Sirius Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-940964-00-3.
- Oldridge, Darren (2012). The Devil, a Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Petersen, Jesper Aagaard. "Modern Satanism: Dark Doctrines and Black Flames". In Lewis & Petersen (2005), pp. 423–458.
- ——— (2009a). "Introduction: Embracing Satan". In Petersen (2009).
- ——— . "From Book to Bit: Enacting Satanism Online". In Asprem & Granholm (2013), pp. 134–158.
- ——— , ed. (2009). Contemporary Religious Satanism: A Critical Anthology. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-5286-1.
- Rothschild, Mike (2021). The Storm Is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything. Melville House. ISBN 978-1612199306.
- Ryan, Nick (2003). Homeland: Into a World of Hate. Edinburgh and London: Mainstream Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84018-465-5.
- Scarre, Geoffrey; Callow, John (2001). Witchcraft and Magic in Sixteenth and Seventeenth-Century Europe (second ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780333920824.
- Schipper, Bernd U. (2010). "From Milton to Modern Satanism: The History of the Devil and the Dynamics between Religion and Literature". Journal of Religion in Europe. 3 (1): 103–124. doi:10.1163/187489210X12597396698744.
- Senholt, Jacob C. "Secret Identities in the Sinister Tradition: Political Esotericism and the Convergence of Radical Islam, Satanism, and National Socialism in the Order of Nine Angles". In Faxneld & Petersen (2013), pp. 250–274.
- Sieg, George (2013). "Angular Momentum: From Traditional to Progressive Satanism in the Order of Nine Angles". International Journal for the Study of New Religions. 4 (2): 251–283. doi:10.1558/ijsnr.v4i2.251.
- Taub, Diane E.; Nelson, Lawrence D. (August 1993). "Satanism in Contemporary America: Establishment or Underground?". The Sociological Quarterly. 34 (3): 523–541. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00124.x.
- Thurston, Robert W. (2001). Witch, Wicce, Mother Goose: The Rise and Fall of the Witch Hunts in Europe and North America. Edinburgh: Longman. ISBN 978-0582438064.
- van Luijk, Ruben (2016). Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780190275105.
- Wexler, Jay (2019). Our Non-Christian Nation: How Atheists, Satanists, Pagans, and Others Are Demanding Their Rightful Place in Public Life. Redwood Press, imprint of Stanford University Press. ISBN 9780804798990.
- Wright, Lawrence (1993). Saints & Sinners. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0-394-57924-0.
Further reading
- Holt, Cimminnee; Petersen, Jesper Aagaard (2016) . "Modern Religious Satanism: A Negotiation of Tensions". In Lewis, James R.; Tøllefsen, Inga (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements, Volume 2 (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 441–452. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190466176.013.33. ISBN 978-0-19-046617-6.
- Introvigne, Massimo (April 13, 2017). "Satan the Prophet: A History of Modern Satanism" (PDF). CESNUR. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 28, 2017. Retrieved December 28, 2020.
External links
- Religious Tolerance page on Satanism Archived 20 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine
Satan | ||
---|---|---|
In the Bible | ||
Deuterocanonical works | ||
Other names & related figures |
| |
In literature | ||
Satanism |
|
New religious movements in the United States | |
---|---|
Antebellum | |
Gilded Age | |
20th century |