Revision as of 03:07, 17 February 2010 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits →Stopping: wikify← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:22, 30 October 2024 edit undoBaranBOT (talk | contribs)Bots, Extended confirmed users16,735 editsm Fix mass message error per WP:AWBREQ | ||
(774 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<b>]</b> ] | |||
== December 2009 == | |||
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2000 light years''' for '''being "too cool for the room"'''. If you believe this block is unjustified you may hold your breath until you turn blue. <b>]</b> ] 04:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC)</div> | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
== Message from 75.4.202.97 == | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 --> | |||
== ] == | |||
Thank you for explaining what was behind that comment by that gentleman. I don't want to use any names and I didn't want to put this on the talk page where you put your message because others might match it up easily. Please delete this message from your talk page as soon as you read it. I don’t know how to phrase what I want to say. I am concerned who might read it, but here goes. His thought process concerns me. Should I be concerned about my safety? Has anything happened to anyone he has felt threatened by or anyone he has disagreed with? Would you advise closing my account on Misplaced Pages? Any other thoughts? Please do not mention his name in replying. Thank you..--] (]) 03:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Hey! I saw that you edited the article '']'' and thought maybe you would be interested in this ]?-]<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00"> (])</span> 05:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Please Pleas Me == | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
Just because it is remastered doesn't make it a different album. All releases of the album after the first are re-releases. ] (]) 03:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
moved to poster's talk | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
== Album infoboxes == | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
'''More informative''' I tried to make the infoboxes more informative by listing the location where the album was recorded. I personally dislike the arbitrary line breaks, but I'm ultimately indifferent to them. ; you may wish to be more careful in the future. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 19:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
==Sockpuppetry== | |||
Fred the Osyter and Dayewalker are socks. The individual is using socks to win the edit war with myself and avoid 3RR violation. No sufficient explanation has been offered as to why my contribution is unacceptable. Even if my edit were wrong, that doesn't excuse the sockpuppetry. Consider the fact that both accounts are editing the same article with the same agenda, and both have misspelled "lead as "lede" both in the edit summary and on my talk page. I would like action to be taken, preferably in the form of a Sockpuppet investigation. ] (]) 21:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
: IP85, why don't you register an account? Then you can file the sockpuppet report yourself, if you feel there's some kind of sockpuppet effort against you. ] (]) 21:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
== Stopping == | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
'''Please don't''' Your note on my talk was simply rude and ]. Your edit summary claiming that I was trolling is patently false. I fail to see how converting HTML elements and applying ] is in any way petulant or disruptive; as such, I have no plans to stop. Also, your edits to ] are breaking the template, so they should be fixed. If you want to discuss something with me civilly, I would be happy to do so. If you continue with your aggressive and rude behavior (this includes your inappropriate addition to ]), I will report your behavior to ]. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 20:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:'''Hounding''' I have never directly encountered this before, but I think your recent edits to ] and ] constitute "]". Your (mis)characterization of my edits appears to be for the sole purpose of undermining anything constructive that I am trying to do on the related pages. This is the final straw for me, as I think that your behavior is tantamount to harassment and is made in ]. If I see you persisting in this manner (behind my back, for exclusively defamatory purposes), I will not hesitate to post to the appropriate part of ], as you are apparently unwilling to discuss with me directly. If there is anything that you have to say to me on this topic, I suggest you post to my talk. | |||
] | |||
:For what it is worth, I also think you should review ], as it makes no mention of infoboxes, nor whether or not England can be declared a part of the UK, and is furthermore an "essay contain the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors, may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion." Rather than a policy, guideline, or even the instructions on a template, which are exactly what I am citing in my favor for including references to the United Kingdom in ] and ]. | |||
:To sum up: your edits regarding my behavior and posts to my talk do not appear to conform to the standards of ]. If I see you posting more slanderous references to me, blind reverting of my edits, edit summaries which call my legitimate edits "trolling" or "vandalism" or any other improper behavior, I will resort to taking this dispute to an admin, as you are unwilling or unable to discuss with me directly. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 03:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> |
Latest revision as of 20:22, 30 October 2024
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,