| Revision as of 11:20, 19 February 2010 editDan Murphy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,045 edits →Felix Eldridge: d← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:14, 16 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Eldridge}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Eldridge}}</ul></div> | ||
| :{{la|Felix Eldridge}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Felix Eldridge (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | :{{la|Felix Eldridge}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Felix Eldridge (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 13: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] (]) 03:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] (]) 03:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' no sources on a blp of a nobody.] (]) 11:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' no sources on a blp of a nobody.] (]) 11:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', not notable.--] (]) 23:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' President of a ''national'' student union is notable--and in this case, particularly because he engaged in nationally noted events. Since he was notable for what he did in 2005, he remains notable always. We're an encyclopedia, not just a current events web site. I do not see how anyone who has looked at the article can fail to notice there is indeed a source present, & one that shows his presidency, which is not peripheral. Needs more sources of course,, and they're right there in Google News Archive. . . ''']''' (]) 00:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Comment''' From my perspective, the subject was not notable "for what he did in 2005", but the events occuring at the time (the introduction of ] were notable. ] (]) 09:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' Student politicians are not notable, not unless they stage a riot or something, NN ''']''' ('']'') 06:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' Despite its pretensions the NUS isn't well known to most university students, and its office holders receive little to no coverage in reliable sources so notability isn't established here. ] (]) 07:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 19:14, 16 May 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg 02:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Felix Eldridge
AfDs for this article:- Felix Eldridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. This page was previously kept after a deletion review, however the article now fails to meet the notability requirements as set out in WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO1E. The article was retained due to the notability of events in 2005. Current day sources are non existent or peripheral Australian Matt (talk) 03:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Australian Matt (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete no sources on a blp of a nobody.Bali ultimate (talk) 11:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable.--Grahame (talk) 23:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep President of a national student union is notable--and in this case, particularly because he engaged in nationally noted events. Since he was notable for what he did in 2005, he remains notable always. We're an encyclopedia, not just a current events web site. I do not see how anyone who has looked at the article can fail to notice there is indeed a source present, & one that shows his presidency, which is not peripheral. Needs more sources of course,, and they're right there in Google News Archive. . . DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment From my perspective, the subject was not notable "for what he did in 2005", but the events occuring at the time (the introduction of Voluntary student unionism were notable. Australian Matt (talk) 09:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Student politicians are not notable, not unless they stage a riot or something, NN YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Despite its pretensions the NUS isn't well known to most university students, and its office holders receive little to no coverage in reliable sources so notability isn't established here. Nick-D (talk) 07:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.