| Revision as of 21:48, 19 February 2010 view sourceVanished user 05 (talk | contribs)6,607 edits →Was it you?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:31, 25 November 2010 view source Avraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators49,160 editsm Protected User talk:Vanished user 05: No reason for a vanished user to have edits to their user or talk pages. ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (53 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| See older threads in the ]. | |||
| Other pages: ] (not updated), my ] | |||
| ==Was it you?== | |||
| Maybe it's time to talk. You now indicated your name. Was it you who sent me an email to my '''work''' with concerns about my health? It was signed "Filatov".] (]) 22:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : No. Whatever it was, it was not me. Period. | |||
| : What was the email address in the field "FROM"? Ok. My email addresses are 1) filatovev@mail.ru, 2) filatov@issp.ac.ru. If neither was hacked, you must have seen a different email address. | |||
| : That's nasty for me to think that someone could use my name. Yet. I did not authorize anybody, ever, to use my emails. And as for signature, everybody could write any word. It could be "Obama", "White elephant", or "Filatov", what's the matter if it's simply a word? | |||
| : Okey. So the letter you speak about is '''anonymous'''. You can propose that person to provide a copy of his documents to identify himself. If that can help you, I can provide a copy of '''my''' documents, and you can always phone the governmental body which issued them, and check that the serial number and the ordinal number of my passport is true. | |||
| : ] (]) 09:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : | |||
| : Anyway, it was wise for you to address me. You are encouraged to address me in cases of any possible misunderstanding. As for political affiliations, I don't think they are very important. I have a close relative with political affiliations resembling yours; what then? he is no less dear for me, because of that. ] (]) 10:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : | |||
| :I am also very interested to learn 1) When did that incident occur? 2) What was the FROM address used in that letter?. Okey, it's very serious for me. You can write to any of the above addresses, or use Misplaced Pages mail. ] (]) 11:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : | |||
| :Besides, I revealed my identity as soon as I started contributing anything substantial to Misplaced Pages, i.e., 2006: . So, I don't quite get your idea that I "now indicated my name". ] (]) 14:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's precisely why I have asked. So, that was your impostor who knew your name. The message came during the EEML case. I thought it might be you, but did not see your name posted at your user page at the time. Now I saw. Nothing more to tell at the moment. Thank you.] (]) 14:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::BTW, I also received other emails, presumably from the same person, but sent through wikipedia email, unlike this message. Did you ever sent any emails to me?] (]) 14:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: I sent you nothing in 2009. As you remember, we exchanged some mails in 2006. ] (]) 17:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: By the way, I would like to know the identity of the impostor. I won't even beat him, but if I ever meet him, I would like to look in his eyes. ] (]) 17:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::To be more precise, you sent me at least three emails through wikipedia system, but I never responded and never sent emails to you. Right? Sorry, but I do not know who that impostor was. Let's drop it and debate on-wiki any problems we might have. Yes, there is a problem. ''You followed me a lot.'' Looking at your edit counter, I am your best talking partner: you made 111 edits at my talk page (your second best talking partner was Muscovite99 who is now indefinitely blocked). First, you followed me in any articles related to Putin. I stopped editing there. Then, you followed me in articles related to human right in Russia. I stopped editing there. You followed me in articles on internet subjects. I almost stopped editing there. Now you follow me in terrorism-related articles. Well, I appreciate when someone follows my edits to improve the content and fix errors. But all your recent edits related to my contributions were ''reverts'', no matter that everything was on the subject and perfectly sourced (I do not provide supporting diffs but can easily do it). Would you please stop doing this? Thank you.] (]) 19:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Biophys, what's the problem? Provide the facts, and I wouldn't ever revert. Do you think I'm pro-Putin or pro-Medvedev? Holy crap. What kills me is the inconsistency of what people say with the reality. That's double thinking, and everything else depicted by Orwell. That's why -- provide facts, not mere speculations, and that's what I wouldn't revert. Hope, that my point is clear. ] (]) 21:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||