Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:26, 5 March 2010 editGiacomoReturned (talk | contribs)Rollbackers11,926 edits →Motions regarding Herostratus and Viridae: Onwards we go← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:10, 25 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,295,546 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 52) (botTag: Replaced 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Front matter}} <noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}</noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Front matter}}{{ArbCom navigation}}
<!-- Archive date of 10 days has been agreed amongst arbitrators and clerks. Do not change without discussion. -->
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive index
⚫ |mask=Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 500k
|counter = 10
|algo = old(4d) |counter = 52
|minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(10d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
'''Behaviour on this page:''' This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.


__TOC__
= Discussion of agenda =
] (please use a header for each new discussion section here)

= Discussion of announcements =

== Appeal to BASC: Offliner ==

⚫ :] <!-- ~~~~ -->

I trust that Offliner's block and appeal had nothing to do with off-Wiki activities against my person and others as the result of the EEML case on WP. All I have to say on the topic. <small style="background:white; border: 1px solid #a12830;">&nbsp;] ►]&nbsp;</small> 00:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Do bans include activity as an anonymous IP, as ?
I personally believe these are one and the same editor but have no appetite for filing checkuser and formal enforcement requests. <small style="background:white; border: 1px solid #a12830;">&nbsp;] ►]&nbsp;</small> 22:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

:I just noticed this ban. I'd be interested to know why the original ban was enacted the way it was: no public announcement, neither on his talk page nor on this noticeboard; talk page immediately full-protected; no indication of the reasons for the ban; no indication of what process had preceded or on the basis of what evidence. Of course, I trust this would all have been communicated with him in private, but I do think some transparency to the community would be required too: What were the charges? Did he do something that is no longer visible or not immediately obvious in his editing history? If not, which of his contributions were deemed so seriously unacceptable?
: I'm a bit concerned that Arbcom seems to have taken a habit of making such ''in camera'' ban decisions without even a minimum of transparency of late. ] ] 13:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

::Offliner's block log clearly states: ''"Consult ArbCom privately for any discussion of this block"'', did you some how miss that? Public discussion of privacy cases is inappropriate as it brings further distress to the victim and provides oxygen to the perpetrator. --] (]) 19:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

== Arbitration motion regarding Eastern European mailing list (3) ==

:]<!-- ~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 18:07, 13 February 2010 (UTC) -->
The diff on the second part of it, at least according to my popups, points to an earlier motion on the same case regarding Piotrus, rather than the actual passed motion here. —<font color="32CD32">'']''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>(] ])</sup></font> 20:48, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
::You didn't scroll down far enough. Better yet, click on it. ] (]) 21:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

== Appeal to BASC: WVBluefield ==

:]<!-- ] <sup>]</sup> 23:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC) -->

== Resignation of Fritzpoll ==

:''']'''

Well that sucks. --]|] 23:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
:That is exactly what I said. ] (]) 23:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for all your volunteer work on Misplaced Pages. Best wishes for you in your new endeavors. ]] 23:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)<br>
The reason for this resignation is not announced. This is too early resignation<s>looks irresponsible.</s><small>refactored per the angry responses, but which still puzzles me greatly. 01:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)</small>--] 23:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
::I'm not even going to dignify that comment with a response. ]‑] 00:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
:::Precisely, per HM. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 00:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
::::Agreed. ] (]) 00:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::C'mon, I voted for him. However, this announcement for the sudden resignation without "any reason" is disappointing. He only has served for ArbCom for one and half month.--] 00:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::: May I gently suggest that claiming people are irresponsible with zero knowledge, ]. You have no idea really. Suppose he had someone seriously sick or in difficulty in the family and didn't wish to be public about it, or a major change of work or study. Suppose the workload is greater than non-Arbs know (which it is). I am sure he too is sad and reflected deeply on the decision. You rate him, you trust him, you don't know anything to the contrary, consider assuming it's a responsible decision and offering support. ]&nbsp;<sup><span style="font-style:italic">(]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])</span></sup> 01:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
*Agree that this is extremely discouraging and comes at a bad time. I am speaking for myself and for what I see is happening on Misplaced Pages. Purely a personal sense of futility and disappointment. —] (]) 01:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
*Aye, you'll be missed. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 02:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
* This really ''does'' suck :( Sorry to see you go ... - ] <sup>]</sup> 02:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
* Enjoy life outside the madhouse! Take it slowly if your head spins. ] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">]</span>'' 12:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

== Ban Appeal Subcommittee membership ==

:] <!-- &nbsp;] <sup>]</sup> 07:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC) -->

== Motions regarding Herostratus and Viridae ==

:]<!-- ~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 15:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC) -->
*I really cannot see what the Arbcom considers Viridae has done wrong. The Arbcom set a precedent by saying it's right and proper to "act first and question later." If that is the correct procedure, and it's certainly their undisputed view that it is, in instances where an edit may reveal potentially embarrassing information concerning an editor (thus needing to be oversighted), how then, is that any different to a compromised account that may suddenly start to produce personal or embarrassing information? This looked to be a distinct possibility in this instance. <small><span style="border:1px solid Blue;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

== Arbitration motion regarding Ireland article names ==

:]<!-- ~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 16:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC) -->

Latest revision as of 18:10, 25 December 2024

Shortcuts
What this page is for:
This page is for discussion of formal announcements by the Committee, including clarification of the specifics of notices.
What this page is not for:
To request arbitration, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests. For information on the Committee, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee. To report a violation of a Committee decision, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52


This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes

Behaviour on this page: This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.