Revision as of 23:38, 7 March 2010 editSupreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,574 edits →Are you: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:30, 25 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(339 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talkarchive}} | ||
== Syrian town depopulation - allegations of "ethnic cleansing" == | |||
{{User:Nsaum75/Sandbox6}} | |||
{{User:Nsaum75/Sandbox5}} | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Syrian_towns_and_villages_depopulated_in_the_Arab-Israeli_conflict#Ethnic_cleansing | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your editing efforts and beautiful images that helped advance ] to good article status. Thank you! ] (]) 00:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{{Archive box|image=] | |||
|{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
|archiveprefix=User talk:Nsaum75/Archives/ | |||
|format=Y/F | |||
|age=500 | |||
|index=yes | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
==Galveston County Library System== | |||
I will go ahead and place the original revision here: ] :) ] (]) 10:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
* Done. I made a slight revision so the userified article isn't counted in any categories (the nowiki tag) ] (]) 10:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
* I'm enjoying it quite a bit. It's fun to stroll around French cities and smell the goodies from the bakeries :) ] (]) 10:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
You argued against this page once, any chance of budging this stupid see also link? I don't know if I have the right arguments. Cheers <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
As for the map, thanks in advance! If the airport indeed falls in the boundaries, the article needs to state such. Also ] needs to be updated with the actual municipality noted. In addition the El Al and airport articles in Hebrew need to be checked too. ] (]) 20:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
== |
== hello friend! == | ||
IMO, the lighting of the first image appears more natural down at street level in front of the building and also in the left background in front of the St. Lukes building. The TCH building looks lighter in the second image. Both look good, but I would pick the first one. ] (]) 01:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:I also prefer the first image - more of the color was kept in it. ] (]) 02:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | :: |
||
:::Maybe so, but the photographs you've provided Misplaced Pages are top quality! ] (]) 05:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
I have posted new pictures on my blog :D how are you doing? saludos!!!] (]) 02:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Photos in ] == | |||
== Quick thanks == | |||
<s>]</s> ] is not my talk page, and I outright reject the idea that these photos ''must'' be in the article. Yes, there are two ways to look at it; we could either expand an already long and comprehensive article just so the photos Gilabrand wants can fit in the article (and I should add most of these were removed not solely because of space), or we could remove photos to accommodate the wealth of information already there. I'm going to choose the latter. Sorry. I don't know where you and Gilabrand get the idea that the more photos there are, the better, but it's blatantly misguided. If you so desperately think the pictures should be in the article, especially those pictures that don't fit currently, then you -- not me -- should be the one spending time expanding the article. I don't think they're important enough to waste my time accommodating them. -- ''']''' 16:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
::I think you may have linked to the wrong section on Gila Brand's talk page, but regardless, you and Gila were having a discussion on the issue, so I felt it was an appropriate place to respond. Furthermore, if you feel that expanding and improving Misplaced Pages articles -- via photos, additional text or revised sections etc. -- is a "waste" of your time, then perhaps you're on the wrong website. Regards. --]<sup>]</sup> 20:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::That's not expanding and improving the article; that was adding pictures to an article with abandon. On the article talk page, I quoted a part of image guidelines that asks that people consider space and relevance when adding images. Gilabrand did not do that, and you're encouraging her not to. As I said, if you think we're supposed to add images of questionable relevance -- and I enumerated their deficiencies on Gilabrand's talk page -- then add filler content to an article to accommodate them, you don't know what you're talking about. Your "wrong website" remark means nothing to me; you and Gilabrand don't even understand that pictures are supposed to illustrate text of the article, not the other way around, so I don't think your opinion on this matter is worth much. -- ''']''' 09:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | : |
||
As a courtesy: thanks for signing my post (d'oh...) ] (]) 01:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Troll== | |||
==Notice== | |||
No worries. I assumed.] (]) 04:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
If you continue to disrupt and make broad attacks against editors, as you have done at the PI Arbitration discussion, you may find yourself blocked or reported for disruptive behavior. You are not doing your side any favors. Consider yourself put on notice. ] (]) 18:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | :Sockpuppet much? This kind of underhanded behavior is exactly why I stopped editing IP articles or contributing photos to things in the middle east. --]<sup>]</sup> 18:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Really now? It seems like your comments there are being ignored and an admin even castigated you for your disruptive comments after it was decided Prop 3 was the consensus winner. I think you would be best served if you chose to edit somewhere where you can keep your POV in check. Just friendly advice. ] (]) 01:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open! == | |||
The ] selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up ] by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the ] and in the ] on the coordinator page.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 22:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)</small> | |||
== |
== complete == | ||
Wow, that's a pretty interesting story! It's too bad that the smoke damage went in the house... ] (]) 11:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Yes, we are done with WP. They are now working on their semester projects which will be presentations. I will get back to tidying some of the articles up later, when the semester is done. Thanks!] (]) 15:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010) == | |||
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 23:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Ahmed Yassin == | |||
== Spanish Misplaced Pages Texas WikiProject == | |||
Hello! I started ] on the Spanish Misplaced Pages, so please stop by if you are interested! ] (]) 08:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Removal of sourced material== | |||
For your information: ]--] (]) 09:53, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
==Antisemitism allegation== | |||
You reverted an edit from an IP address to ] that had added the phrase "and the spiritual leader" to a seemingly hidden part of a reference. You called the edit "vandalism". If you are correct, it is vandalism of an unusually subtle variety. Can you elaborate on this, so that I can understand this sort of thing better? Thank you very much. ] (]) 19:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
In response to a comment I wrote on Gilabrand's talk page "No doubt part of a disturbing trend where sourced material that happens to be written by a Jew is challenged as not being RS simply because of the religion of the author...sigh --". Could you please clarify what you mean? You seem to be suggesting that I am warning Gilabrand simply because she is Jewish. ] (]) 10:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
: |
:Reversion was based not on the spirituality addition, but on the blanking of the entire section on alleged terrorist attacks that was sourced. If you the page, you will see it. --]<sup>[[User talk:nsaum75|<span lang="he" xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">¡שיחת!</span>&lr</sup> | ||
::Thank you. Sorry for being a bit slow. ] (]) 23:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | :::No problem. Happens to the best of us. Have a good weekend!. --]<sup>]</sup> 23:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Vandalismo== | |||
Per , I reported them to AIV as you had already warned them several times. Saludos --]<sup>]</sup> 10:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you so much, he love to attack me, so it's normal to see my page blanked. Happy Thanksgiving ]<sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 18:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == Za'atar == | ||
Your arguments at Za'atar are disruptive and unhelpful. Your personal attacks and battlefield mentality towards those who support the World View and Misplaced Pages policy will not continue to be tolerated. If you continue to disrupt the discussion with POV and "alternative suggestions" that go against policy, enforcement action may be necessary. ] (]) 04:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == |
||
: Nsaum, don't waste your time on a likely sock of a banned user--] (]) 05:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
planning something special for me? --] (]) 23:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:30, 25 February 2023
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nsaum75. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Syrian town depopulation - allegations of "ethnic cleansing"
You argued against this page once, any chance of budging this stupid see also link? I don't know if I have the right arguments. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.41.85 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
hello friend!
I have posted new pictures on my blog :D how are you doing? saludos!!!MarioAlvarez05 (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Quick thanks
As a courtesy: thanks for signing my post (d'oh...) VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Notice
If you continue to disrupt and make broad attacks against editors, as you have done at the PI Arbitration discussion, you may find yourself blocked or reported for disruptive behavior. You are not doing your side any favors. Consider yourself put on notice. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet much? This kind of underhanded behavior is exactly why I stopped editing IP articles or contributing photos to things in the middle east. --nsaum75 18:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Really now? It seems like your comments there are being ignored and an admin even castigated you for your disruptive comments after it was decided Prop 3 was the consensus winner. I think you would be best served if you chose to edit somewhere where you can keep your POV in check. Just friendly advice. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
complete
Yes, we are done with WP. They are now working on their semester projects which will be presentations. I will get back to tidying some of the articles up later, when the semester is done. Thanks!Thelmadatter (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Ahmed Yassin
Hello, You reverted an edit from an IP address to Ahmed Yassin that had added the phrase "and the spiritual leader" to a seemingly hidden part of a reference. You called the edit "vandalism". If you are correct, it is vandalism of an unusually subtle variety. Can you elaborate on this, so that I can understand this sort of thing better? Thank you very much. Cullen328 (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Reversion was based not on the spirituality addition, but on the blanking of the entire section on alleged terrorist attacks that was sourced. If you scroll down the page, you will see it. --nsaum75
- Thank you. Sorry for being a bit slow. Cullen328 (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Happens to the best of us. Have a good weekend!. --nsaum75 23:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. Sorry for being a bit slow. Cullen328 (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Vandalismo
Per this, I reported them to AIV as you had already warned them several times. Saludos --nsaum75 10:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, he love to attack me, so it's normal to see my page blanked. Happy Thanksgiving Tbhotch 18:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Za'atar
Your arguments at Za'atar are disruptive and unhelpful. Your personal attacks and battlefield mentality towards those who support the World View and Misplaced Pages policy will not continue to be tolerated. If you continue to disrupt the discussion with POV and "alternative suggestions" that go against policy, enforcement action may be necessary. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Nsaum, don't waste your time on a likely sock of a banned user--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)