| Revision as of 07:19, 11 March 2010 editPhoenixrod (talk | contribs)9,182 edits →I've reverted your edits at Amores (Lucian): I seem to a similar concern← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:42, 25 August 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in welcome template (Task 5)Tag: AWB | ||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{#if:|== {{{heading}}} ==|}} | {{#if:|== {{{heading}}} ==|}} | ||
| {| width="100%" style="background:transparent" | {| width="100%" style="background:transparent" | ||
| {| width="100%" style="background-color:<!-- Bug -->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=FFF5F5|F5FFFA}}" | |||
| |style="width: 50%; border:1px solid <!-- Strange bug makes the number sign have to go in front of the parserfunction here-->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=800808|084080}}; background-color:<!-- Bug -->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=FFF5F5|F5FFFA}}; vertical-align:top"| | |style="width: 50%; border:1px solid <!-- Strange bug makes the number sign have to go in front of the parserfunction here-->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=800808|084080}}; background-color:<!-- Bug -->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=FFF5F5|F5FFFA}}; vertical-align:top"| | ||
| {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:<!-- Bug -->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=FFF5F5|F5FFFA}}" | {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:<!-- Bug -->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=FFF5F5|F5FFFA}}" | ||
| | <div style="margin: 0; background-color:{{#switch:{{{color}}}|cyan=#CEF2E0|pink=#F2CECE|#CECEF2}}; font-family: sans-serif; border:1px solid {{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=#800808|#084080}}; text-align:left; color:black; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"><p>Hello, Tonalone, and ''''']'''''</p> | | <div style="margin: 0; background-color:{{#switch:{{{color}}}|cyan=#CEF2E0|pink=#F2CECE|#CECEF2}}; font-family: sans-serif; border:1px solid {{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=#800808|#084080}}; text-align:left; color:black; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"><p>Hello, Tonalone, and ''''']'''''</p> | ||
| <p>Please remember to ] by clicking ] or using four tildes <nowiki>(~~~~)</nowiki>; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the ]. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.</p>{{#if:|<p>{{{1}}}</p>|}} | <p>Please remember to ] by clicking ] or using four tildes <nowiki>(~~~~)</nowiki>; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the ]. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.</p>{{#if:|<p>{{{1}}}</p>|}} | ||
| <p>Happy editing! ] (]) 02:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)</p> | <p>Happy editing! ] (]) 02:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)</p></div> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| {| width="100%" style="background-color:<!-- Bug -->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=FFF5F5|F5FFFA}}" | {| width="100%" style="background-color:<!-- Bug -->#{{#switch:{{{color}}}|pink=FFF5F5|F5FFFA}}" | ||
| Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| Thank you for the brief visit.--] (]) 15:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| Hi why do you remove stuf that are correct from the Bocelli page as if you are the only one who has the right to contibute to that page! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Hi why do you assume I am acting like I am the only one who has the right to contribute to the page. Please see the comment attached to the removal.] (]) | |||
| Because thats wat u do, u keep removing every thing people write, even when its sourced and state raisons that are subjective; like the award section in Bocelli's page for example: wats ur problem with me stating all the awards won by Bocelli during his carrer, all of which are important awards. Perhaps I should create a page titled Awards won by Bocelli, and just put a link to that article under Awards in the Bocelli article, if u prefer, but i dont see y i cant just put all of them. | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Leonardo da Vinci== | |||
| Please do not remove statements that are well sourced, like Count Melzi's statement that Leonardo's love for his pupils was "passionate", and that Leonardo's sexuality had been subject to "satire". As it happens, the earliest mention (after his death) that Leonardo may have been homosexual comes from a 16th century satirical novel in which Leonardo is interviewed and questioned about his relationships and he says something to the effect that boys are irrestible at fifteen when taken from behind. The purported interview is satire. It is certainly not a serious study, but it does seriously indicate a trend that later analysis was to take. | |||
| Also, the reason for the odd placement of the reference in mid sentence is that words like "famous" etc are not used in wikipedia, unless they are cited. The referenced is to that one word, not to the whole statement. ] (]) 11:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==List of awards won by Bocelli== | |||
| I undid your edits of the Bocelli award page, and the award section in the Bocelli article ... i don't see why we shouldn't put the awards in a seperate page, especially since I'm not done with editing the page you deleted. I was gonna do it the right way tomorrow but I need the page I started today, so I wouldn't have to restart everything, Tx. Plus there are many important nominations, for grammys and such that need to be added, and that will take too much space in the article. On the other hand, i don't have a problem with the edits you made with the Andrea Bocelli Template, I think I'll just write a separate article about each opera recording, as I would do for any of Bocelli's regular albums.] (]) 05:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Well other artists have pages about there awards, and it really isn't a big deal so you should maybe let it go. Plus grammy nominations, eccho awards and classical brit awards are important awards, (and being nominated to a grammy is a big deal) or else they wouldn't have thier own articles on wiki. I'm gonna undo it for the last time, please don't create n editing war for small deal.--] (]) 03:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Tonalone: Regarding ]. Your edit removing the 'Anecdotes' section was justified because the section was ostensibly the work of a 'banned editor.' I saw no proof for that assertion. In fact the Anecdotes had been accruing for several years. If you want to edit this article, please have some legitimate reason. Thanks. ] (]) 06:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Plus I haven't made the article feathure more awards, the awards listed are the same as was in the article the only diffrence is they are better organised. An another thing opera and classical music aren't the same thing.--] (]) 03:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Banned users == | |||
| I know I meant opera music is singing arias from operas, and performing in operas, whereas classical music is a more generel term that includes other thinks, like a Canzone Napoletana or a hym, all of which Bocelli also performes, again not a big deal, so lets not argue over a simple word added in an article that is actually factual.--] (]) 03:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I've noticed that you've been removing chunks of material from articles for several months, claiming it was added by some unnamed banned user. Please explain who this "banned user" is and how you know who they are. I find your edits really dubious. We are ''not'' obliged to remove edits by banned users but usually decide on a case-by-case basis - we certainly don't do it if it damages the articles because the articles are what we're all here for. If you continue edit warring and deleting material from articles without giving a damn good reason (and some vague "banned user" claim is not a good reason) you're the one who is going to be blocked for damaging articles. I've looked at the history of this page and I see this has been an issue since at least back in February when someone contacted you about the Szymanowski article. FYI, per the ] policy, which allows editors in good standing to take responsibility for a banned user's reverted edits, I've restored that material to the page. ] 13:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == I've reverted your edits at ] == | |||
| ⚫ | == Possibly unfree File:Vocal technique.ogg == | ||
| Hello Tonalone, I've reverted your edits at ]. Please don't "undo" obviously useful edits to articles. ] ] 00:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> --]] 01:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :On the same lines, please stop blanking accurate and sourced information at ]. If this continues, please decide what form of ] you would prefer. ] <small>]</small> 16:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I appear to have a similar concern at, for example, ]. I have to your message on my talk page and would like more information on this banned user whose edits you say you are undoing. It concerns me that I don't seem to be the first to raise questions about your removal of content. -] (]) 07:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| == The historical issue of pederasty == | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Tonalone! I notice that you have been making some bold edits lately, removing content dealing with the historical issue of pederasty. Pederasty was a fact of life in ancient Greece and Rome and it must be addressed in a spirit of historical objectivity. I and many others have opposed edits that set out to promote pederasty - such as by the now banned user ]. Edits promoting pederasty disrupt, annoy and discourage conscientious editors - which is what your edits are also doing. Please use talk pages to discuss issues before making major changes. Sometimes history and propaganda differ in degree rather than in kind - as in deciding how much emphasis or space should be given to a particular issue like pederasty - and for that we must rely on the guidance of published scholars, not on our personal preferences. Edits promoting pederasty tend to have the following characteristics: | |||
| *they rely on sentimental accounts by authors of doubtful authority, ancient or modern, often quoting them in superfluous detail; | |||
| *they exaggerate the issue of pederasty by giving it more space or a more priviledged position than it deserves i.e. they don't follow the priorities established by accepted scholars; | |||
| *they misrepresent and misinterpret sources from habitual disregard for accuracy or from outright dishonesty; | |||
| *they add to a 'walled garden' of interlinked articles presenting a sentimental or favourable view of pederasty, based mainly on the idealised accounts of priviledged 5th/4th century Athenians; | |||
| *they locate pederastic images in inappropriate places, such as at the head of an article that has almost nothing to do with pederasty, so that other articles link to that image. etc | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| Propagandist edits like those cannot be countered by mere deletion of pederastic content - deletion merely clears the space for spiders to weave their webs again and it undoes the hard work of conscientious editors who were trying to keep the spiders in check. I hope you will accept this advice, in everyone's best interest. ] (]) 01:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 25 August 2021
Welcome
|
Thank you for the brief visit.--Tonalone (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Tonalone: Regarding Malik Ayaz. Your edit removing the 'Anecdotes' section was justified because the section was ostensibly the work of a 'banned editor.' I saw no proof for that assertion. In fact the Anecdotes had been accruing for several years. If you want to edit this article, please have some legitimate reason. Thanks. 69.226.218.19 (talk) 06:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Banned users
I've noticed that you've been removing chunks of material from articles for several months, claiming it was added by some unnamed banned user. Please explain who this "banned user" is and how you know who they are. I find your edits really dubious. We are not obliged to remove edits by banned users but usually decide on a case-by-case basis - we certainly don't do it if it damages the articles because the articles are what we're all here for. If you continue edit warring and deleting material from articles without giving a damn good reason (and some vague "banned user" claim is not a good reason) you're the one who is going to be blocked for damaging articles. I've looked at the history of this page and I see this has been an issue since at least back in February when someone contacted you about the Szymanowski article. FYI, per the BAN policy, which allows editors in good standing to take responsibility for a banned user's reverted edits, I've restored that material to the page. Sarah 13:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Vocal technique.ogg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vocal technique.ogg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu 01:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)