Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/KyleHamilton: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:15, 14 January 2006 view sourcePalthrow (talk | contribs)3,419 edits →Oppose← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:25, 11 May 2022 view source WOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators854,737 editsm Fix lint errors 
(22 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
#'''Support'''. Only because he seems to deserve substantially less opposition than some of these candidates are getting. ]<font style="color:#FF72E3;"><span class="Unicode">&#09660;</span></font>'''<sup>]</sup>'''<font color="#FF0000" size="+1"><span class="Unicode">&#09829;</span></font><sup>''']'''</sup><font color="#5500FF" size="+1">'''<span class="Unicode">&#09809;</span>'''</font> 21:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Support'''. Only because he seems to deserve substantially less opposition than some of these candidates are getting. ]<font style="color:#FF72E3;"><span class="Unicode">&#09660;</span></font>'''<sup>]</sup>'''<font color="#FF0000" size="+1"><span class="Unicode">&#09829;</span></font><sup>''']'''</sup><font color="#5500FF" size="+1">'''<span class="Unicode">&#09809;</span>'''</font> 21:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support'''] 21:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Support'''] 21:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Strong support'''. Seems well adjusted, balanced, and acts in a neutral manner, based on responses to questions (see the questions link in the statement section). Also seems thoughtful enough to produce sensible rather than vengeful decisions. Being fairly new, and not part of a clique, is a good thing, not something to be frowned upon. --] | ] 18:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' ] 12:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


==Oppose== ==Oppose==
Line 29: Line 31:
#] 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #] 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#] <small><sup>] ] </sup></small> 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #] <small><sup>] ] </sup></small> 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#&mdash;]]] 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #&mdash;]]] 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' policy. ] | ] | ] 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) # '''Oppose''' policy. ] | ] | ] 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Inexperience - ] ] 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - Inexperience - ] ] 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 43: Line 45:
#'''Oppose'''.--] 02:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''.--] 02:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#Reluctantly '''oppose''' as experience really does matter in this type of role. ] 03:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #Reluctantly '''oppose''' as experience really does matter in this type of role. ] 03:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] ] 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#] 05:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #] 05:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' inexperience. --] 05:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' inexperience. --] 05:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 54: Line 56:
#'''Oppose'''. Sorry, too new. --] | <sup>] | ]</sup> 09:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Sorry, too new. --] | <sup>] | ]</sup> 09:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#Lack of XP. &mdash;] ] 12:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #Lack of XP. &mdash;] ] 12:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. &nbsp;]]] 13:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. &nbsp;]]] 13:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppoaw''' beat people with sticks? Come on! ] 13:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppoaw''' beat people with sticks? Come on! ] 13:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', xp. ]]] 13:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', xp. ]]] 13:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', xp --] 14:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', xp --] 14:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', lack of experience. ] ] <sup>]</sup> 14:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', lack of experience. ] ] <sup>]</sup> 14:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Not enough experience (in beating people with sticks :))&mdash;] 16:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Not enough experience (in beating people with sticks :))&mdash;] 16:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] 17:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] 17:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 65: Line 67:
#'''Oppose''' - not active enough, needs experience. ] 20:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - not active enough, needs experience. ] 20:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', as Awolf. --] 20:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', as Awolf. --] 20:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Hasn't been active enough to be familiar enough with policy, etc. ]]]''']''' 22:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Hasn't been active enough to be familiar enough with policy, etc. ]]]''']''' 22:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. If you can't bother to check your spelling, how much effort can you expend on arbitration? ] 23:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. If you can't bother to check your spelling, how much effort can you expend on arbitration? ] 23:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 89: Line 91:
#'''Oppose''' --] 18:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' --] 18:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - too new -- ] ] 00:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - too new -- ] ] 00:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Inexperience -] (<small>] | ]</small>) 06:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Inexperience --] (<small>] | ]</small>) 06:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Can't spell properly! -] #'''Oppose'''. Can't spell properly! -]
#--] | ] 05:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' interesting candidate but I can forsee conflict with wiki and life outside ] 13:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Barely has suffrage in this election. ] | ] 22:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] 22:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''--] 01:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' XP and poorly written candidate statement -- ] 04:53, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' inexperience. ] 17:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' --] <sup>]</sup> 05:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
#Insufficient experience. ]&nbsp;] 07:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
# ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 05:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' —inexperience and incoherent answers to some questions —] <small>(] • ])</small> 17:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' inexperience and poor writing <small>&mdash;''The preceding ] comment was added by'' ] (]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->
#'''Oppose''' - wikipedia is '''not''' a repository of all human knowlege (that would violate copyright, and currently wikipedia has no absolutely reliable fact checking methodology). - ] 17:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
#''']''' ] <small>(])</small> 01:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' ] 19:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
==Neutral== ==Neutral==
#Support for statement and questions (and as per ]), but oppose based on lack of experience = '''Neutral'''. ] 16:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC) #Support for statement and questions (and as per ]), but oppose based on lack of experience = '''Neutral'''. ] 16:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:25, 11 May 2022

KyleHamilton

My Name is Kyle Hamilton; I am a junior at the Brooks Inst of Photography. I am majoring in Film.

I am interested in the working on the arbitration committee because I have a good deal of experience in dealing with disputes and getting to a speedy resolution. I refined my ability by working with producers in the film industry and by working on set having to make quick decisions/resolutions on set.

The approach I would use to help resolve disputes here would be as follows

1: Look at how the article was developed and try to establish a clear unclouded record of how the article was developed.
2: Look into what other users have done in the past.
3: Review what other members of the arbitration committee have done in the past.
4: stay neutral stay neutral stay neutral.
5: Beat people with sticks

Misplaced Pages is more then an encyclopedia to me, it is a repository of all human knowledge a concept that many here in our community don’t grasp this is something more then an encyclopedia it is something short of a miracle, Misplaced Pages and her sister projects are home to all of Humanitys works and knowledge.

Questions

Support

Support -- Sound reasoning and good intentions. ArbCom oughtn't be a veterans-only cartel. Adrian Lamo 01:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Support. Like his reasoning. --Dogbreathcanada 02:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  1. Support Dogbreathcanada should be given suffrage due to his fantastic username. freestylefrappe 04:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Support. --Kefalonia 09:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Support. Only because he seems to deserve substantially less opposition than some of these candidates are getting. ℬastique▼♥♑ 21:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. SupportDr. B 21:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Strong support. Seems well adjusted, balanced, and acts in a neutral manner, based on responses to questions (see the questions link in the statement section). Also seems thoughtful enough to produce sensible rather than vengeful decisions. Being fairly new, and not part of a clique, is a good thing, not something to be frowned upon. --Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 18:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Support Jared 12:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose, lack of experience. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Michael Snow 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Zach 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. —Kirill Lokshin 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose policy. David | explanation | Talk 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Oppose - Inexperience - Mackensen (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Oppose. Too new. Ambi 00:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. --Jaranda 00:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  9. Cryptic (talk) 00:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  10. Oppose. --GraemeL 00:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  11. – Quadell 00:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  12. Oppose as too inexperienced. Batmanand 00:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  13. Oppose --Angelo 01:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  14. Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  15. Oppose, experience. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  16. Oppose.--ragesoss 02:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  17. Reluctantly oppose as experience really does matter in this type of role. Jonathunder 03:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  18. Oppose. SlimVirgin 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  19. Bobet 05:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  20. Oppose inexperience. --Crunch 05:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  21. Oppose. I don't know you, but wish you the best. Ëvilphoenix 05:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  22. Oppose. android79 06:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  23. Oppose. Too new. — Catherine\ 06:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  24. Oppose--cj | talk 06:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  25. Oppose. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  26. Oppose. why? ++Lar: t/c 09:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  27. Oppose. Sorry, too new. --Blu Aardvark | 09:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  28. Lack of XP. —Nightstallion (?) 12:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  29. Oppose sorry but I must oppose.  ALKIVAR™ 13:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  30. Oppoaw beat people with sticks? Come on!  Grue  13:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  31. Oppose, xp. Radiant_>|< 13:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  32. Oppose, xp --kingboyk 14:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  33. Oppose, lack of experience. the wub "?!" 14:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  34. Oppose. Not enough experience (in beating people with sticks :))—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 16:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  35. Oppose. siafu 17:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  36. Oppose Not enough experience --Comics 17:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  37. Oppose for lack of experience. —Quarl 2006-01-09 20:13Z
  38. Oppose - not active enough, needs experience. Awolf002 20:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  39. Oppose, as Awolf. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 20:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  40. Oppose. Hasn't been active enough to be familiar enough with policy, etc. Hermione1980 22:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  41. Splash 23:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  42. Oppose. If you can't bother to check your spelling, how much effort can you expend on arbitration? Avriette 23:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  43. --Doc 01:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  44. Oppose Sarah Ewart 01:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  45. older≠wiser 02:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  46. Opposed based on the answers to questions and overall expression of understanding. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 02:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  47. Raven4x4x 09:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  48. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 12:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  49. Opposed warpozio 12:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  50. Oppose, inexperienced. HGB 18:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  51. Oppose inexperienced --EMS | Talk 20:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  52. Oppose. This candidate is the first where I believe their statement indicates that they comprehend arbitration, and that I agree with that comprehension as a matter of policy, but that I believe the candidate does not show the character required of an arbitrator on a personal level. Maybe in a number of years. Try working as a mediator on Wiki first, it'll knock some of the corners off your idealism, and make you well placed to arbitrate. Fifelfoo 22:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  53. Oppose, inexperienced, sorry. -- Ian Manka 23:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  54. Oppose (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) - Mailer Diablo 01:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  55. Oppose Vsmith 01:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  56. Opposed. clear unclouded record --JWSchmidt 02:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  57. Oppose. enochlau (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  58. Oppose. --Masssiveego 07:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  59. Oppose, experience. KTC 19:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  60. - Vote Signed By: Chazz- Place comments here
  61. Oppose. Not sure if the candidate understands the function of ArbCom. Velvetsmog 23:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  62. Oppose --Adrian Buehlmann 18:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  63. Oppose - too new -- Francs2000 00:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  64. Oppose. Inexperience --Aude (talk | contribs) 06:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  65. Oppose. Can't spell properly! -Palthrow
  66. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  67. Oppose interesting candidate but I can forsee conflict with wiki and life outside Gnangarra 13:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  68. Oppose. Neutrality 15:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  69. Oppose. Barely has suffrage in this election. Superm401 | Talk 22:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  70. Oppose. Preaky 22:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  71. Oppose--nixie 01:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  72. Oppose XP and poorly written candidate statement -- Masonpatriot 04:53, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  73. Oppose inexperience. Youngamerican 17:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  74. Oppose --Loopy 05:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  75. Insufficient experience. Ingoolemo  07:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  76. Bratsche 05:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  77. Oppose —inexperience and incoherent answers to some questions —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  78. Oppose inexperience and poor writing —The preceding unsigned comment was added by wrp103 (talk • contribs) .
  79. Oppose - wikipedia is not a repository of all human knowlege (that would violate copyright, and currently wikipedia has no absolutely reliable fact checking methodology). - JustinWick 17:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  80. Oppose Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  81. Oppose Alex43223 19:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Support for statement and questions (and as per Bastique), but oppose based on lack of experience = Neutral. Thryduulf 16:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)