Revision as of 05:47, 25 March 2010 view sourceSanalbvk (talk | contribs)119 edits Undid revision 351801063 by Maverick1728 (talk)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:49, 24 December 2024 view source Malhar1234 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users654 editsm Information about the founderTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Indian political party}} | |||
{{Cleanup|date=November 2009}} | |||
{{Redirect|BJP}} | |||
{{Infobox Indian Political Party | |||
{{Pp-semi-indef}} | |||
| party_name = Bharatiya Janata Party | |||
{{Pp-move|small=yes}} | |||
| party_logo = ] | |||
{{Good article}} | |||
| chairman = ] | |||
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2021}} | |||
| ppchairman = Nitin Gadkari | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} | |||
| loksabha_leader = ] | |||
{{Infobox Indian political party | |||
| rajyasabha_leader = ] | |||
| |
| party_name = Bharatiya Janata Party | ||
| |
| logo = ] | ||
| |
| abbreviation = BJP | ||
| colorcode = {{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
| rajyasabha_seats = 55 | |||
| president = ]<ref>{{Cite news|author=Ananya Das|date=20 January 2020|title=Jagat Prakash Nadda: BJP's new national president rises through the ranks, faces several challenges|work=Zee News|url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/jagat-prakash-nadda-bjps-new-national-president-rises-through-the-ranks-faces-several-challenges-2258301.html|url-status=live|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152910/https://zeenews.india.com/india/jagat-prakash-nadda-bjps-new-national-president-rises-through-the-ranks-faces-several-challenges-2258301.html|archive-date=28 March 2020}}</ref> | |||
| states_govt_its_own = ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| general_secretary = '''General Secretary''' ('''Organisation''')''':'''<br />]<ref>{{Cite news|author=Gyan Varma|date=15 July 2019|title=Meet BL Santhosh, newly appointed general secretary of BJP|work=live mint|url=https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html|url-status=live|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152911/https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html|archive-date=28 March 2020}}</ref><br />{{Hidden|Other General Secretaries|'''Joint General Secretary:'''<br />]<br />'''General Secretaries:'''<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]}} | |||
| states_govt_with_coaliation = ], ], ] | |||
| treasurer = ]<ref>{{Cite news|date=27 September 2020|title=Rajesh Agarwal gets BJP treasurer post|work=United News of India|url=http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|url-status=live|access-date=12 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017113913/http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|archive-date=17 October 2020}}</ref> | |||
| ideology = ]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>] | |||
| presidium = ]<ref name="Constitution">{{Cite web|title=Bharatiya Janata Party Constitution|url=https://www.bjp.org/en/constitution|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171118173055/http://www.bjp.org/images/pdf_2012_h/constitution_eng_jan_10_2013.pdf|archive-date=18 November 2017|access-date=15 May 2020|website=BJP official website|publisher=Bharatiya Janata Party}}</ref> | |||
| headquarters = 11 Ashoka Road<br> ], ] <br>110001 | |||
| ppchairman = ]<br /> (]) | |||
| publication = | |||
| loksabha_leader = ]<br /> (])<ref name=":3000">{{Cite news|date=12 June 2019|title=BJP announces new parliamentary committee; Modi leader in Lok Sabha, Rajnath his deputy|work=India Today|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12|url-status=live|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141325/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12|archive-date=6 April 2020}}</ref> | |||
| website = | |||
| rajyasabha_leader = ]<br /> (]) | |||
| foundation = {{Start date and age|df=yes|p=y|1980|04|06}}<ref name=":4000">{{Cite news|date=6 April 2019|title=BJP's foundation day: Brief history of the achievements and failures of the party|work=The Indian Express|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190511143721/https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/|archive-date=11 May 2019}}</ref> | |||
| founder = {{ublist|] &|]<ref name=":3001">{{Cite news|date=23 May 2019|title=What you need to know about India's BJP|work=AlJazeera|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html|url-status=live|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513075856/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html|archive-date=13 May 2020}}</ref>}} | |||
| headquarters = 6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, <br />], ], ]<ref>{{Cite web |title=BJP Gets A New Address; Soul Of New Office Is The Party Worker, Says PM Modi|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141326/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|archive-date=6 April 2020|access-date=16 March 2020 |website=NDTV.com}}</ref> | |||
| eci = ]{{sfn|Election Commission|2013}} | |||
| alliance = ] (])<ref name="bjp0right">{{Cite news|author=Devesh Kumar|date=20 May 2014|title=BJP + 29 Parties=National Democratic Alliance|work=NDTV|url=https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141401/https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972|archive-date=6 April 2020}}</ref><br />] (])<br /> | |||
] (])<ref>{{Cite news|date=13 March 2019|title=BJP seals alliances in Northeast, aims 22 LS seats|work=The Hindu Business Line|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece |url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317165853/https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece|archive-date=17 March 2020}}</ref> | |||
| loksabha_seats = {{Composition bar|240|543|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''540''' MPs & '''1''' Vacant)<ref>{{Cite web|title=Party Position pdf|url=http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317173437/http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|archive-date=17 March 2020|access-date=17 March 2020}}</ref> | |||
| rajyasabha_seats = {{Composition bar|96|245|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''225''' MPs & '''10''' Vacant)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjps-rajya-sabha-tally-dips-to-86-nda-at-101-party-below-majority-mark-6109105 | title=BJP's Rajya Sabha Tally Dips, NDA Now 4 Below Majority Mark }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Alphabetical Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|url=https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190604121829/https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|archive-date=4 June 2019|access-date=22 September 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Strengthwise Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|url=http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170606134311/http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|archive-date=6 June 2017|publisher=Rajya Sabha}}</ref><!-- Please do not change without a more up-to-date reference --><!-- Seats after Rajya Sabha election, 2020 --> | |||
| state_seats_name = ] | |||
| state_seats = {{Composition bar|1478|4036|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
('''4013''' MLAs & | |||
'''23''' Vacant) | |||
(]) | |||
| state2_seats_name = ] | |||
| state2_seats = {{Composition bar|165|426|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
('''403''' MLCs & '''23''' Vacant) | |||
(]) | |||
| no_states = {{Composition bar|20|31|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''28''' States and '''3''' UTs)<ref>{{Cite news|date=26 November 2019|title=BJP gains back Madhya Pradesh in just 15 months after losing it|work=India Today|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|url-status=live|access-date=23 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211119202332/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|archive-date=19 November 2021}}</ref> | |||
| ideology = {{ubl|class=nowrap||] (])<ref name="mathewjoh">* {{Cite book|last1=Johnson|first1=Matthew|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism|title=Conservatism and Ideology|last2=Garnett|first2=Mark |last3=Walker|first3=David M|date=2017|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-317-52900-2|pages=45–50|access-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061245/https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism|archive-date=14 April 2023|url-status=live}} | |||
* Björn Goldstein (2015) The unconscious Indianization of 'Western' conservatism – is Indian conservatism a universal model?, Global Discourse, 5:1, 44–65, {{doi|10.1080/23269995.2014.946315}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Mazumdar|first1=Surajit|date=2017|title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India|url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93182|journal=Desenvolvimento Em Debate|via=]|volume=5|issue=1|pages=115–131|doi=10.51861/ded.dmds.1.011|access-date=24 April 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061248/https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93182/|url-status=live| issn = 2176-9257}} | |||
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|last1=Chhibber|first1=Pradeep. K.|last2=Verma|first2=Rahul|isbn=978-0-19-062390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|pages=50–150|year=2018|publisher=]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|]<ref name="Surajit 2017">* {{Cite journal|last=Mazumdar|first=Surajit|date=2017|title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India|url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93182 |url-status=live|journal=Desenvolvimento Em Debate|volume=5|issue=1 |pages=115–131|doi=10.51861/ded.dmds.1.011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061248/https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93182/|archive-date=14 April 2023|access-date=24 April 2022|via=]}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Gopalakrishnan|first1=Shankar|title=Defining, Constructing and Policing a 'New India': Relationship between Neoliberalism and Hindutva|journal=Economic & Political Weekly|date=7 July 2006|volume=41|issue=26|pages=2803–2813|jstor=4418408|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408|access-date=26 September 2020|archive-date=17 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017234207/https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Wilson|first1=Kalpana|last2=Ung Loh|first2=Jennifer|last3=Purewal|first3=Navtej|title=Gender, Violence and the Neoliberal State in India|journal=Feminist Review|date=July 2018|volume=119|issue=1|pages=1–6|doi=10.1057/s41305-018-0109-8|s2cid=149814002|url=https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf|access-date=8 November 2020|archive-date=10 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201210111943/https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Mathur|first1=Navdeep|title=The low politics of higher education: saffron branded neoliberalism and the assault on Indian universities|journal=Critical Policy Studies|date=2018|volume=12 |issue=1|pages=121–125|doi=10.1080/19460171.2017.1403343|s2cid=148842457}}</ref> | |||
|]<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Johnson|first1=Matthew|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism|title=Conservatism and Ideology|last2=Garnett|first2=Mark|last3=Walker|first3=David M|date=2017|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-317-52900-2|pages=45–50|access-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061245/https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism|archive-date=14 April 2023|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|]<ref name="Angana.p">* {{Cite book|last1=Chatterji|first1=Angana P.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology|title=Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India|last2=Hansen|first2=Thomas Blom|last3=Jaffrelot|first3=Christophe|date=2019|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-19-007817-1|pages=100–130|author-link=Angana P. Chatterji|author-link2=Thomas Blom Hansen|author-link3=Christophe Jaffrelot|access-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology|archive-date=14 April 2023|url-status=live}} | |||
* ], and Cynthia Schoch. "Conclusion to Part I." In Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, 148–54. ], 2021. {{doi|10.2307/j.ctv1dc9jzx.12}}. | |||
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|last1=Chhibber|first1=Pradeep. K.|last2=Verma|first2=Rahul |isbn=978-0-19-062390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|year=2018|publisher=]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|]<ref>* Henrik Berglund. "Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP." ] 39, no. 10 (2004): 1064–70. {{JSTOR|4414737}}. | |||
* Chhibber, Pradeep K. "State Policy, Party Politics, and the Rise of the BJP." In Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India, 159–76. ], 1999. {{JSTOR|10.3998/mpub.23136.12}}.</ref> | |||
|]<ref>* {{cite journal|volume=26|issue=3|journal=Democratization|first1=Duncan|last1=McDonnell|year=2019|first2=Luis|last2=Cabrera|title=The right-wing populism of India's Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care)|pages=484–501|doi=10.1080/13510347.2018.1551885|s2cid=149464986}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Özçelik|first=Ezgi|title=Right-wing Populist Governments Rhetorical Framing of Economic Inequality : the Cases of BJP in India and AKP in Turkey|publisher=Koç University|year=2019}}</ref>}} | |||
| position = {{nowrap|]{{sfnm|1a1=Malik|1a2=Singh|1y=1992|1pp=318–336|BBC|2012|2a1=Banerjee|2y=2005|2p=3118}} to ]<ref name="Davies"/>}} | |||
| publication = '']'' {{nowrap|(] and ])<ref>{{Cite news|author=Siddhartha Rai|date=27 January 2017|title=PM Modi goes cashless, buys lifetime subscription of BJP mouthpiece Kamal Sandesh through cheque|work=India Today|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328080500/https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27 |archive-date=28 March 2020}}</ref>}}<br /> | |||
''Kamal Barta'' {{nowrap|(])<ref>{{Cite news|last=Sengupta|first=Tamal|title=Bengal BJP revamps party mouthpiece before 2018 panchayet elections|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook&from=mdr|url-status=live|access-date=29 May 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook&from=mdr|archive-date=14 April 2023}}</ref>}} | |||
| students = ]<br />(unofficial)<ref>{{Cite web|title=Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad is not the students' wing of BJP: Shreehari Borikar|url=https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200228202158/https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|archive-date=28 February 2020|access-date=23 September 2019}}</ref> | |||
| youth = ]<ref>{{Cite news|date=19 January 2019|title=BJP youth wing launches its campaign for party's Lok Sabha poll win|work=Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012115329/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms|archive-date=12 October 2020}}</ref> | |||
| women = ]<ref>{{Cite news |date=5 April 2019 |title=Quota for women in council of ministers among Mahila Morcha's suggestions for BJP poll manifesto |work=Economic Times |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |url-status=live |access-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220607235558/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |archive-date=7 June 2022}}</ref> | |||
| peasants = BJP Kisan Morcha<ref name="KisanMorcha">{{Cite news|author=Rajkumar|title=सरकार की नीतियों को किसानों तक पहुंचाएगा बीजेपी किसान मोर्चा|work=m.patrika.com|url=https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/|url-status=live|access-date=8 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201019220329/https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/ |archive-date=19 October 2020}}</ref> | |||
| think_tank = Public Policy Research Centre<ref>{{Cite web|title=Public Policy Research Centre|url=http://www.pprc.in/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726220734/http://www.pprc.in/|archive-date=26 July 2020 |access-date=22 July 2020}}</ref><ref name="Thinktank">—{{Cite news |date=23 May 2020|title=BJP think tank offers online course in governance; babus to impart lessons|publisher=The New Indian Express|location=New Delhi|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html |url-status=live|access-date=14 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200714094916/https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html |archive-date=14 July 2020}} | |||
* {{cite news|url =https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|title =BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card|publisher =]|quote =Public Policy Research Center (PPRC), BJP's think tank, on Monday released a comprehensive report on 100 major decisions and initiatives taken by Modi Government in first 100 days.|location =New Delhi|date =10 September 2019|website =dailypioneer.com|access-date =14 July 2020|archive-date =16 July 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200716135158/https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|url-status =live}}</ref> | |||
| website = {{Official URL}} | |||
| predecessor = ]<br />(1951–1977)<ref name=":4000" /><br />]<br />(1977–1980)<ref name=":4000" /> | |||
| split = ]<ref name=":4000" /> | |||
| labour = ]<ref>{{Cite news|author=Pragya Singh|date=15 January 2008|title=Need to Know BJP-led BMS is biggest labour union in India|work=live mint|url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html |url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181103131425/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html|archive-date=3 November 2018}}</ref> | |||
| international = ]<ref>{{Cite web|title=International Democrat Union » Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU)|url=http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170616235358/http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|archive-date=16 June 2017|access-date=12 June 2017|website=International Democracy Union}}</ref> | |||
| colours = {{colour box|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}|border=darkgray}} Saffron<ref>{{Cite web|last=Iwanek|first=Krzysztof|date=10 September 2018|title=Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties|url=https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623014149/https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|archive-date=23 June 2021|access-date=5 July 2021|publisher=]|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
| symbol = ]<br />] | |||
| flag = BJP flag.svg | |||
| leader = | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Bharatiya Janata Party sidebar}} | |||
{{BJPSegmentsUnderInfoBox}} | |||
{{Contains special characters|Indic}} | |||
The '''Bharatiya Janata Party''' ('''BJP''', {{IPA-hns|bʱaːɾətiːjə dʒənətaː paːɾʈiː||Hindi-Bharatiya Janata Party.ogg|pronunciation}}; {{lit|Indian People's Party}}) is a political party in ] and one of the two major ] alongside the ].<ref>{{Cite news|date=19 May 2016|title=In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress|work=The Times of India|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|url-status=live|access-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171105170102/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|archive-date=5 November 2017}}</ref> BJP was born out from ]'s ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-07-06 |title=Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the barrister who founded Bharatiya Janta Party |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-affairs/story/remembering-shyama-prasad-mukherjee-the-founder-of-bharatiya-jana-sangh-that-later-became-bharatiya-janta-party-1563356-2019-07-06 |access-date=2024-12-24 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref> Since 2014, it has been the ] under the incumbent ] ].<ref name="zeenews-25May19">{{Cite news |date=25 May 2019 |title=Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303 |work=Zee News |url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806 |url-status=live |access-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190602032641/https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806 |archive-date=2 June 2019}}</ref> The BJP is aligned with ] and has close ideological and organisational links to the ] (RSS), a ] ].<ref>{{Cite news|date=17 March 2019|title=Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch|work=Business Standard|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|url-status=live|access-date=18 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152912/https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|archive-date=28 March 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23210230231166197 | doi=10.1177/23210230231166197 | title=Hindu Nationalism and Right-wing Ecology: RSS, Modi and Motherland Post-2014 | date=2023 | last1=Sharma | first1=Mukul | journal=Studies in Indian Politics | volume=11 | pages=102–117 }}</ref> Its policies adhere to ], a ] ideology.{{sfn|Banerjee|2005|p=3118}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|p=318}} {{as of|2024|01|post=,}} it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the ] as well as ]. | |||
The '''Bharatiya Janata Party''' ('''BJP''') ({{lang-hi|भारतीय जनता पार्टी }}), ]: ''Indian People's Party'') is a major ] in ], founded in 1980. The party is associated with ] and advocates ] social policies, self-reliance, free ], foreign policy driven by a nationalist agenda, and strong national defense<ref> About us - bjp.org</ref>. | |||
The party's origins lie in the ], which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician ], after he left ] to form a party as the political wing of RSS.{{sfn|Swain|2001|p=60}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Subba |first=Chhawang |date=4 April 2022 |title=Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and the Role of Bharatiya Jana Sangh in Indian Politics |url=https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2204072.pdf |website=IJCRT |page=a570 |issn=2320-2882 |access-date=21 February 2024 |archive-date=21 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240221100951/https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2204072.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> After ] of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the ]; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the ]. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the ], it grew in strength on the back of the movement around ] in ]. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader ], lasted for only 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} | |||
The BJP, in alliance with several other parties, was in power from 1998 to 2004, with ] as the ] and ] as his deputy. It is the biggest constituent of the ] which is currently in the ]. | |||
After the ], the BJP-led coalition known as the ] (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the ], the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the ], led the party to a landslide victory in the ]. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected with a sole majority in the ] and with a coalition in the ]. {{as of|2023|12|post=,}} the alliance governs 17 Indian states and union territories. | |||
The official ideology of the BJP is ], first formulated by ] in 1965. The party advocates ] and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindu nationalist priorities, and focused on a largely ] that prioritised ] and ] over ].{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} Since returning to government in 2014, the BJP government has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of ], and revoking ] (which granted autonomy to ]), ].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650">{{Cite journal |last1=Bhatty |first1=Kiran |last2=Sundar |first2=Nandini |date=17 September 2020 |title=Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime |journal=International Sociology |publisher=SAGE Publications |volume=35 |issue=6 |pages=632–650 |doi=10.1177/0268580920937226 |issn=0268-5809 |s2cid=224896271}}</ref> | |||
The party has frequently spread ] and has been condemned by foreign entities for spreading conspiracy theories.<ref name="q786"/><ref name="z245"/> India has experienced nationwide ] under the ].<ref name="v-dem.net briefing_paper_9">{{Cite web |last1=Hindle |first1=Garry |last2=Lindberg |first2=Staffan |date=2020 |title=New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party |url=https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024234004/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2021 |access-date=9 October 2021 |publisher=V-Dem Institute}}</ref><ref name="v-dem.net Democracy Report 2021">{{citation |first1=Nazifa |last1=Alizada |first2=Rowan |last2=Cole |first3=Lisa |last3=Gastaldi |first4=Sandra |last4=Grahn |first5=Sebastian |last5=Hellmeier |first6=Palina |last6=Kolvani |first7=Jean |last7=Lachapelle |first8=Anna |last8=Lührmann |first9=Seraphine F. |last9=Maerz |first10=Shreeya |last10=Pillai |first11=Staffan I. |last11=Lindberg |date=2021 |title=Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021 |work=University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute |url=https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210914030243/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf |archive-date=14 September 2021 |pages=20–21}}</ref><ref name="The Hindu Democratic Backsliding">{{cite news |last1=Sirnate |first1=Vasundhara |date=27 November 2021 |title=The democratic backsliding of India |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-democratic-backsliding-of-india/article37696763.ece |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220830070248/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-democratic-backsliding-of-india/article37696763.ece |archive-date=30 August 2022 |work=]}}</ref><ref name="Ashoka Democratic Backsliding">{{cite document |title=Democratic Backsliding in the World's Largest Democracy | last=Das |first=Sabyasachi |date=3 July 2023 |publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
== Name, symbol, and themes == | |||
].]] | |||
The name as well as the symbol of the party were selected by the founders. The name "Bharatiya Janata Party" literally translates to "Indian People's Party". The Symbol of the party is the flower ].<ref>{{Cite web |first=Joanna |last=Banerjee-Fischer |title=What do India's political logos symbolize?|date=January 27, 2024 |url=https://www.dw.com/en/what-do-indias-political-logos-symbolize/a-68095324 |access-date=2024-03-24 |website=dw.com |language=en |archive-date=24 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240324083500/https://www.dw.com/en/what-do-indias-political-logos-symbolize/a-68095324 |url-status=live }}</ref> Lotus has a cultural significance within India as well as ]. The symbol has been regarded as a symbol of peace and prosperity within Hinduism. Likewise, during the ], the symbol was used by ] as a symbol of revolt against the ].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Suraiya |first=Jug |title=NaMo and the lotus |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/jugglebandhi/namo-and-the-lotus/?source=app&frmapp=yes |access-date=2024-03-24 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257 |archive-date=24 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240324083458/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/jugglebandhi/namo-and-the-lotus/?source=app&frmapp=yes |url-status=live }}</ref> Lotus is also recognised as the ]. Thus, use of the symbol gives the party a nationalist as well as Hindutva appeal.<ref>{{Cite web |title=BJP's 43 years: How it emerged from Jana Sangh and became world's largest party |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-foundation-day-journey-from-jana-sangh-modi-shah-vajpayee-advani-2356698-2023-04-06 |access-date=2024-03-24 |website=India Today |date=6 April 2023 |language=en |archive-date=2 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102123718/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-foundation-day-journey-from-jana-sangh-modi-shah-vajpayee-advani-2356698-2023-04-06 |url-status=live }}</ref> Besides these, the party also heavily uses the ] colour in its promotional materials and campaigning. Similar to Lotus, the Saffron colour also has a major significance within Hinduism.<ref name=":0" /> The most common flag used by the party is predominantly saffron with a stripe of green in the left. Within the Saffron part of the flag, the lotus symbol is also integrated.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Iwanek |first=Krzysztof |title=Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties |url=https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/ |access-date=2024-03-24 |website=thediplomat.com |language=en-US |archive-date=23 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623014149/https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/ |url-status=live }}</ref> This particular colour scheme used in the flag assists the party to project itself as a ] party. Meanwhile, this also helps the party to maintain a religious undertone for its core electorate and ].<ref name=":1" /> | |||
== Precursors == | |||
=== Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77) === | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| header = Influential figures | |||
| width = 220 | |||
| image1 = Shyama Prasad Mukherjee portrait in Parliament.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ], founder-president of the ] | |||
| image3 = Lkadvani.jpg | |||
| caption3 = ], the last president of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh | |||
}} | |||
{{Main|Bharatiya Jana Sangh}} | |||
The BJP's origins lie in the ], popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by ] in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant ]. It was founded in collaboration with the ] volunteer organisation, the ] (RSS), and was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS.{{sfn|Noorani|1978|p=216}} The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of ] by the ] and then-Prime Minister ]. The RSS loaned several of its leading '']'', or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was ], who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three ] seats in the ]. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=116–119}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}} | |||
The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of ] into India.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} ] was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of ], which formed the official doctrine of the party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=122–126, 129–130}} Younger leaders, such as ] and ] also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a ], banning ] and abolishing the ].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=250, 352, 413}} | |||
After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the ] and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the ], including ], ] and ]. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=427–428}} | |||
=== Janata Party (1977–80) === | |||
{{Main|Janata Party}} | |||
In 1975, Prime Minister ] imposed a ]. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the ], the ] and the ] to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}} The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with ] as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. ], previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the ].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}} | |||
The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist ] wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=282–283}} The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=292–301, 312}} ] increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in ] and ] in 1978–79.{{Citation needed|date=March 2024}} The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the former Jana Sangh members should dissociate themselves from the RSS, which they refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the ]. The ] was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing Desai's resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=301–312}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}} | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
=== Formation and early days === | |||
{{Main|History of the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
{{multiple image | |||
{{See also|Bharatiya Jana Sangh}} | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| header = Influential figures | |||
| width = 220 | |||
| image2 = Atal Bihari Vajpayee (crop 2).jpg | |||
| caption2 = ], the founder-president of the Bharatiya Janata Party | |||
}} | |||
Although the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president.<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 April 2020 |orig-date=7 April 1980 |title=Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412160225/https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/ |archive-date=12 April 2021 |access-date=12 April 2021 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref> Historian ] writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the ] stance of its predecessor the Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of ].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} This was unsuccessful, as it won only two ] seats in the ].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} The ] a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the ] which won a record tally of 414 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=579}} | |||
=== Ram Janmabhoomi movement === | |||
] Founder of ]]] | |||
{{Main|Ram Rath Yatra}} | |||
], the first BJP ] (1996).]] | |||
{{Further|Ayodhya dispute|Demolition of the Babri Masjid}} | |||
The BJP is the current form of the erstwhile ] (BJS, ''Indian People's Union''), which was founded in 1951 by ] as the political wing of the ]. The fortunes of the young party took a dip in 1953, when Mookherjee was jailed in ] by then Indian Prime Minister, ]{{Citation needed|date=December 2009}}. After Mookerjee's death in prison, the BJS lasted for 24 more years, but never seriously challenged the power of ]{{Citation needed|date=December 2009}}. It did however groom future political leaders like ] and ], who were in the party when it was a constituent of the Janata Party government in 1977<ref></ref>. | |||
]]] | |||
The failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindu nationalism.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Pai|1996|pp=1170–1183}} In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the ] movement. In the early 1980s, the ] (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a ] dedicated to the Hindu deity ] at the ] of the ] in ]. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor ] in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there.{{sfn|Jha|2003}} The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque.{{sfn|Flint|2005|p=165}} The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 ] seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the ] government of ].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=582–598}} | |||
In September 1990, Advani began a '']'' (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the ''yatra'' was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim".{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=635}} Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then ] chief minister ]. A large number of '']'' (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several ''kar sevaks''. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh. {{sfn|Guha|2007|p=636}} The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the ] assembly.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} | |||
The Janata government did not last long. Morarji Desai resigned as Prime Minister, and the Janata party was dissolved soon after. The BJS had devoted political organization to sustain the coalition and was left exhausted by the internecine wars within the Janata Party. | |||
On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the ].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition.{{sfn|NDTV|2012}}{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} | |||
In 1980 ], ] and ], founded the Bharatiya Janata Party with Vajpayee as its first President. The BJP was a strong critic of the ] government that followed the Janata rule, and while it opposed the Sikh militancy that was rising in the state of ], it also blamed Indira Gandhi for divisive and corrupt politics that fostered the militancy at national expense. Leader Darasingh opines that Vajpayee thus "brought in Hindu-Sikh harmony."<ref>http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/apr162004/d10.asp</ref> | |||
A ], authored by Justice ], found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and ]. The report also criticised ], Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} In 2020, the ] acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.<ref>{{Cite news |date=30 September 2020 |title=All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case {{!}} Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it |language=en-IN |work=The Hindu |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece |url-status=live |access-date=12 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412195725/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece |archive-date=12 April 2021 |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> | |||
On December 6, 1992, hundreds of VHP and BJP activists broke down an organized protest into a frenzied attack, and brought down the mosque. Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted in various parts of the country, killing over 1000 people. The VHP was banned by the government, and many BJP leaders including Lal Krishna Advani were arrested briefly for provoking the destruction. Although widely condemned by many across the country for playing politics with sensitive issues, the BJP won the support of millions of conservative Hindus, as well as national prominence. | |||
Following the ], the ] announced a trust to construct the Mandir. On 22 January 2024, the ] was officially opened.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2024-01-22 |title=Ram Temple inauguration: Advent of a new era, says PM Modi |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/others/advent-of-a-new-era-says-pm-101705947809336.html |access-date=2024-01-24 |website=Hindustan Times |language=en}}</ref> Prime Minister ] led its consecration, claiming it to be the start of a new era.<ref name=":0" /> The temple is expected to be fully completed by December 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-01-04 |title=First, second floors of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya to be completed by Dec 2024: Temple official |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/first-second-floors-of-ram-mandir-to-be-completed-by-dec-2024-temple-official-101704386640281.html |access-date=2024-02-01 |website=Hindustan Times |language=en}}</ref> | |||
=== Vajpayee and Advani era (1996–2004) === | |||
In the Lok Sabha elections held in 1998 the ] (NDA) obtained a ]. This time, the BJP (NDA) had allied with the ] (AIADMK) and the ] besides its existing allies, the ], the ] and ]. Outside support was provided by the ]. The NDA had a slim majority, and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister after a 13-day stint in 1996. But the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, ], withdrew her support, and fresh elections were again called. | |||
{{further|National Democratic Alliance}} | |||
A coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the ] (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the ], the ], the ] in addition to the ] (AIADMK) and the ]. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; ], for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=254}} The NDA had a majority with outside support from the ] (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister.{{sfn|rediff.com|1998}} However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, ], withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.{{sfn|Outlook|2013}} | |||
==State leadership== | |||
* | |||
==BJP MPs in parliament== | |||
* | |||
* ] | |||
On 13 October 1999, without the AIADMK, the NDA won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest-ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister{{efn|in 2002}} and ]. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror and ] economic policies.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In 2001, ], then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in ].{{sfn|Kattakayam|2012}}{{sfn|India Today|2001}} He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.{{sfn|Tehelka|2001}} | |||
== Objectives and policies == | |||
] with U.S. President ] in the Oval Office. Indo-US relations touched a new high under the Vajpayee administration.]] | |||
The concept of ] has a special place in its ideology, with the party aiming to transform India in to a modern, progressive and enlightened nation which draws inspiration from India's ancient Indian culture and values. As per the party's constitution the objectives of the party are explained thus: | |||
==== 2002 Gujarat violence ==== | |||
"The party is pledged to build up India as a strong and prosperous nation, which is modern, progressive and enlightened in outlook and which proudly draws inspiration from India's ancient culture and values and thus is able to emerge as a great world power playing an effective role in the comity of Nations for the establishment of world peace and a just international order. The Party aims at establishing a democratic state which guarantees to all citizens irrespective of caste, creed or sex, political, social and economic justice, equality of opportunity and liberty of faith and expression. | |||
{{Main|2002 Gujarat violence}} | |||
The Party shall bear true faith and allegiance to ] as by law established and to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy and would uphold the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India." | |||
On 27 February 2002, a ] outside the town of ], killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of ] that lasted several weeks.{{sfn|Ghassem-Fachandi|2012|pp=1–31}} The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}} Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}}{{sfn|Harris|2012}} The then-Gujarat chief minister ] and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties.{{sfn|Krishnan|2012}} In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT. BJP ] ], who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment;{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2014}}{{sfn|NDTV.com|2012}} she was later acquitted by the ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=20 April 2018 |title=Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence |work=India Today |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20 |url-status=live |access-date=6 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200229064652/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20 |archive-date=29 February 2020}}</ref> Scholars such as ], ] and ] have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.{{sfn|Brass|2005|pp=385–393}}{{sfn|Gupta|2011|p=252}}{{sfn|Nussbaum|2008|p=2}} | |||
=== In opposition (2004–2014) === | |||
Some of the professed goals of the BJP are<ref></ref>: | |||
Vajpayee called for ], six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "]", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}} However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the ], compared to the 222 of the Congress and its allies. ] succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the ]. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2004}} | |||
In May 2008, the BJP won the ]. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any ]n state. In the ], its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. The election campaign would be the final for Advani as leader. The party would be led by ] in the Rajya Sabha and ] in the Lok Sabha for the following 5 years. It lost the ] in 2013.{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2009}} | |||
* '''Anti terror measures''' - Revive the anti-terror mechanism that has been dismantled by the Congress; improve upon POTA to ensure it is more effective as an instrument of deterrence and a tool to prosecute offenders without innocent people being harassed; and, strengthen the operational role of the National Investigating Agency. | |||
* '''Special Courts for speedy prosecution''' - Special courts will be set up for speedy prosecution of those involved with acts of ]. Their trial shall be fair and justice will be done for the victims swiftly. | |||
* '''National identity card of all''' - BJP proposes to make it incumbent for every Indian to have a National Identity card. The National Identity Card will also strengthen ] by ensuring accurate citizen identity, thus tracking illegal immigration. | |||
* '''Food security''' - Provide 35 kg of rice or wheat every month to BPL families at Rs 2 per kg under an improved and expanded Antyodaya Anna Yojana. This will be available against ‘Food Coupons’ redeemable at both PDS and private outlets. | |||
* '''Energy security''' - It proposes to invest heavily in developing non-fossil fuel-based ] sources, especially for electricity production. Its goal will be to add at least 120,000 MW of power over the next five years, with 20 per cent of it coming from renewable sources. | |||
* '''Urban India''' - In pursuit of the principle of ‘Shelter for All’, 10 lakh dwelling units for the poor will be constructed every year. For existing urban centres, basic infrastructure facilities and amenities of water, drainage, roads, electricity, environment and ] will be enhanced for a clean and healthy city life. | |||
* '''Agriculture''' - Waive agricultural loans. Set a maximum ceiling of 4 per cent interest for agricultural loans to farmers from banks. Introduce a pension scheme for aged and helpless farmers. Create irrigation facilities for an additional 35 million hectares of land in five years: This will generate rural jobs as well as benefit farmers. Drip irrigation will be promoted along with better water management and use of check dams. | |||
* Keeping farmers interest protected with the help of National Land Use Policy before land acquisition for infrastructure. | |||
* '''Education for all''' - The success story of ], launched by the NDA in 2002, shall be strengthened, extended and concretised further in quality, content and support systems. Implementation of the mid-day meal scheme shall be revitalised on modern management lines. Akshaya Patra Scheme will serve as a model for this purpose. Universalisation of secondary education shall be speedily implemented. Special emphasis will be given to girls’ education at the secondary level. Institutions of higher learning shall be given full autonomy, coupled with accountability, in real practice. | |||
* '''Article 370''' - It poses a psychological barrier for the full integration of the people of Jammu & Kashmir with the national mainstream. The BJP remains committed to the abrogation of this Article. | |||
* To increase bilateral ties with ] and other ] countries - an ideology that BJP has supported since its formation, in stark contrast to strong ties of Congress-led governments with Russia. BJP has since sought to and improved its relations with all post-Cold War nations allied to the Western front. | |||
* '''Health for all''' - Set up a National Regulatory Authority for private hospitals, nursing homes and special care facilities to ensure quality services, affordable fees and prevent/punish malpractice. While private sector participation in health care is welcome, it cannot become a source of unrestricted and unrestrained profit making at the expense of the people. Clean drinking water is one of the best barriers against common but often fatal diseases. The BJP proposes to make access to clean drinking water a fundamental right for all citizens. | |||
* '''One Earth, Green Earth''' - BJP wants to give appropriate importance to containing ]. Lay importance on energy security and ] pathways by setting clear targets for ] and renewable energy. | |||
* '''Religious Conversions''' - The BJP wants to facilitate, under the auspices of noted religious leaders, the setting up of a permanent ] consultative mechanism to promote harmony among and trust between communities{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}. This mechanism will also be used for a sustained and sincere Inter-Faith Dialogue between leaders of the Hindu and Christian communities on all aspects of life, including the issue of religious conversions. The dialogue should be held in the spirit of the unanimous report of the Inter-Faith Dialogue on Conversions, which was organised at the Vatican in May 2006 by the Pontifical Council for Inter-Faith Dialogue and the World Council of Churches, Geneva. | |||
=== Modi era (2014–present) === | |||
The BJP stands for strong ], ]{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}, and ] (a market where only ] can benefit) economic policies, but ] has been its core philosophy and identity ever since its inception. The BJP stand on economic policies saw a sudden volte face in the mid nineties from a support of ] products to the embracing of free market ideas. | |||
{{Main|Premiership of Narendra Modi}} | |||
Another important factor is the ongoing territorial dispute over ] and the wars of 1947-48, 1962, 1965, and 1971, and recently the 1999 ] War. The BJP and its supporters feel India must remain vigilant against threats from ], the ], and elsewhere such as ]. | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| header = | |||
| width = 220 | |||
| image1 = PM Modi 2015.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ], Prime Minister of India since 2014 | |||
| image2 = Amit Shah photographed during the first Union Cabinet Meeting of the 18th Lok Sabha (cropped).jpg | |||
| caption2 = ] has been the longest (continuous) serving ] of the BJP | |||
}} | |||
In the ], the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha.{{sfn|Mathew|2014}} Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th ] on 26 May 2014.{{sfn|Deccan Chronicle|2014}}{{sfn|BBC|May|2014}} The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament{{sfn|Times of India|2014}} and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its own strength. Support was concentrated in the ] in North-central India.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} | |||
Economic policy under BJP-led governments at the state and center has been heavily focused on infrastructure building and pro-reform, which is congenial to Indian interests and to necessary conforming to international regulations (like environment laws) market-oriented economic growth without making subtle changes to the existing policies. | |||
Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term.{{sfn|Diwakar|2014}} The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and ] people, as well as among ]es.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The BJP was also very successful at mobilizing its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} | |||
== Indian Prime Ministers from the BJP == | |||
* ] - (1996), (1998-2004): Vajpayee served as the eleventh ]. After a brief stint as Prime Minister in 1996, Vajpayee headed a coalition government from March 19, 1998 until May 19, 2004. He served as a Member of Parliament (MP) from ] until 2009, and has since retired from active politics. | |||
After winning the election, the organisation of the BJP became more centralised with Modi at the helm.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sen |first=Suhit K. |title=BJP, which mocks Congress, has fallen prey to extreme centralisation |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/bjp-which-mocks-congress-has-fallen-prey-to-extreme-centralisation-2810695 |access-date=2024-02-14 |website=Deccan Herald |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214100233/https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/bjp-which-mocks-congress-has-fallen-prey-to-extreme-centralisation-2810695 |url-status=live }}</ref> People loyal to Modi were rewarded leadership positions across various states within India.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-12-18 |title=All the PM's people: How Modi is shaping BJP organisationally, redefining 'party democracy' |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/pm-modi-bjp-narendra-modi-amit-shah-9073105/ |access-date=2024-02-14 |website=The Indian Express |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214100233/https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/pm-modi-bjp-narendra-modi-amit-shah-9073105/ |url-status=live }}</ref> ], a close confidant of Modi, was appointed as the president of the BJP in 2014.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Amit Shah's elevation as BJP President signals a generational change and Modi's complete takeover of the party |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20140728-amit-shah-elevation-bjp-president-modi-complete-takeover-of-party-804609-2014-07-17 |access-date=2024-02-14 |website=India Today |date=17 July 2014 |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214101707/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20140728-amit-shah-elevation-bjp-president-modi-complete-takeover-of-party-804609-2014-07-17 |url-status=live }}</ref> Contextually, many veteran leaders of the party like ], ], and ] amongst others were allegedly sidelined.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chaturvedi |first=Rakesh Mohan |date=2014-03-22 |title=Narendra Modi sidelines old guard in BJP; Jaswant Singh gearing up to contest from Barmer as Independent |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/narendra-modi-sidelines-old-guard-in-bjp-jaswant-singh-gearing-up-to-contest-from-barmer-as-independent/articleshow/32441833.cms |access-date=2024-02-14 |work=The Economic Times |issn=0013-0389 |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214101707/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/narendra-modi-sidelines-old-guard-in-bjp-jaswant-singh-gearing-up-to-contest-from-barmer-as-independent/articleshow/32441833.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== BJP in various states == | |||
] | |||
BJP is currently in power in five states (], ], ], ] and ]) where the party enjoys a majority of its own. In five other states — ], ], ], ] and ] — it shares power with other alliance partners. | |||
In 2016, the BJP joined the ], a grouping of various ] political parties across the globe.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pillalamarri |first=Akhilesh |title=India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties |url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties/ |access-date=2024-02-14 |website=thediplomat.com |language=en-US |archive-date=25 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225011058/https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties/ |url-status=live }}</ref> However, as of 2024, the party is no longer a member, the secretary general of the IDU, Tina Mercep, stated that they would welcome full membership of the BJP in their global network. However, ] remains a member of the youth wing of the IDU.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-02-05 |title=Stephen Harper's Global Alliance of Conservative Parties Quietly Scrubbed India Off Its Website |url=https://pressprogress.ca/stephen-harpers-global-alliance-of-conservative-parties-quietly-scrubbed-india-off-its-website/ |access-date=2024-02-14 |website=PressProgress |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214095121/https://pressprogress.ca/stephen-harpers-global-alliance-of-conservative-parties-quietly-scrubbed-india-off-its-website/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=BJP Conspicuous by Absence from Global Centre-Right Political Parties' Alliance |url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-conspicuous-by-absence-from-global-centre-right-political-parties-alliance |access-date=2024-07-10 |website=The Wire |language=en}}</ref> | |||
=== List of current BJP Chief Ministers and Deputy Chief Ministers=== | |||
*] - ] | |||
*] - ] | |||
*] - ] | |||
*] - ] | |||
*] - ] | |||
*] - ] | |||
*] - ](Deputy Chief Minister) | |||
*] - ](Deputy Chief Minister) | |||
During Modi's first term as prime minister, the BJP expanded its presence in several states where it had previously been a minor player, and it regained power in other states where it had been in opposition for a considerable period. ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] saw an increase in the BJP's influence, and the party entered government in several of these states.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Karmakar |first=Rahul |date=2018-12-31 |title=2018 was a landmark year for BJP, women in Northeast |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/2018-was-a-landmark-year-for-bjp-women-in-northeast/article25875880.ece |access-date=2024-02-14 |work=The Hindu |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214103448/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/2018-was-a-landmark-year-for-bjp-women-in-northeast/article25875880.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== Controversies and criticism == | |||
* Ram Janambhoomi - The party has been criticized for its direct involvement in the movement which culminated in the destruction of the ] in favor of building the ] temple. | |||
* Communal violence - In 2002, ] happened in ] under BJP rule, after an attack by a Muslim mob on a train comprising mostly of Hindu pilgrims.<ref>'Scores killed in Indian Train Attack - BBC News' http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1843591.stm. Retrieved on 2008-06-20</ref>. As a result, communal riots erupted in ]. The state government of ] and its ] ] have been accused of helping the Hindu mobs, a charge that it denies{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}. The ] criticized the government, pointing to "a comprehensive failure on the part of the State Government of Gujarat to control persistent violations of rights. A judicial commission headed by ], a former chief justice of the ], constituted to examine allegations of Gujarat state administration's involvement in the riots of 2002 said that there was no evidence to implicate either Modi or his administration in the riots.<ref> 'No police lapse in Gujarat riots: Justice Nanavati.' (2003) http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/may/18guj.htm. Retrieved on 2008-06-20</ref> | |||
In 2019, the BJP won the general election with an increased majority. Soon after returning to power, on 5 August 2019, the ] revoked the special status, or ], granted under ] of the ] to ]—a region administered by ] as a state. This state consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of a dispute among India, ], and ] since 1947.<ref name="britannica-jammu-kashmir">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Jammu and Kashmir, State, India |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir |access-date=7 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820091609/https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir |archive-date=20 August 2019 |quote=Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947. |last2=Kirk |first2=William |last1=Akhtar |first1=Rais |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Jan·OsmanczykOsmańczyk2003">{{Cite book |last=Osmańczyk |first=Edmund Jan |title=Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-415-93922-5 |editor-last=Mango |editor-first=Anthony |edition=3rd |volume=2: G–M |page=1189 |chapter=Jammu and Kashmir. |quote=Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China. |author-link=Edmund Osmańczyk |access-date=16 June 2020 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061302/https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* Expulsion of a senior party leader and founder like Jaswant Singh for writing the book "]" has been questioned for suppression of freedom of expression and diverse voices within the party.<ref>Jaswant Singh’s graceless, baseless expulsion will haunt BJP for long http://www.indianexpress.com/news/jaswant-singhs-graceless-baseless-expulsion-will-haunt-bjp-for-long/505501/</ref> | |||
Later in 2019, the Modi administration introduced the ], which was passed by the ] on 11 December 2019. It amended the ] by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of ], ], ], ], ], or ] religion, who had ] from ], ] and ] before December 2014.<ref name="BBC explained"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212192621/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50670393 |date=12 December 2019 }}, BBC News, 11 December 2019.</ref><ref name="PIBPassesBill">{{Cite web |title=Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019 |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=195783 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191216092712/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx%3Frelid%3D195783 |archive-date=16 December 2019 |access-date=18 December 2019 |website=pib.gov.in}}</ref> ] from those countries were not given such eligibility.<ref name="Washington Post" /> The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under ].<ref name="Washington Post">{{Cite news |last=Slater |first=Joanna |date=18 December 2019 |title=Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191218215158/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |archive-date=18 December 2019}}</ref>{{efn|{{harvp|Sharma|2019|p=523}}: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Sen|2018|pp=10–11}}: "Nehru's response made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=34–35}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} A report by the ] described India as experiencing ] due to the ].<ref name="v-dem.net briefing_paper_9" /><ref name="v-dem.net Democracy Report 2021" /> Various other studies and media sources also cite India experiencing democratic backsliding.<ref name="Ashoka Democratic Backsliding"/><ref>{{cite document |last=Bajpaee |first=Chietigj |title=What Democratic Backsliding Means for India |date=April 2024 |publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Biswas |first=Soutik |date=16 March 2021 |title='Electoral autocracy': The downgrading of India's democracy |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-56393944 |website=]}}</ref><ref name="The Hindu Democratic Backsliding" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Bala |first=Sumathi |date=16 May 2024 |title=Modi's strongman rule raises questions about India's 'democratic decline' as he seeks a third term |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/17/modi-strongman-rule-raises-questions-on-indias-democratic-decline.html |website=]}}</ref> This is considered the most notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian ] years of 1975–77.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 December 2016 |title=Interview with Indira Gandhi |url=https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811131347/https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |archive-date=11 August 2019 |access-date=14 June 2018 |website=Interview relecast through India times |publisher=TV Eye}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=29 June 2015 |title=Recalling the Emergency years |work=The Indian Express |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |url-status=live |access-date=14 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200531210846/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |archive-date=31 May 2020}}</ref> | |||
* Organizations belonging to the ] of which BJP is a part and the political face, were involved in ] in the states of ], ] and ]. Several organizations have reported that violence against ] has increased significantly since BJP assumed power as it either turns a blind eye to the incidents, justifies it in the name of ]s or helps the perpetrators .<ref>Anti christian violence on the rise in India http://www.hrw.org/en/news/1999/09/29/anti-christian-violence-rise-india</ref><ref></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref> | |||
== |
== Ideology and political positions == | ||
The party along the history has been widely described as a ],{{sfnm|1a1=Malik|1a2=Singh|1y=1992|1pp=318–336|BBC|2012|2a1=Banerjee|2y=2005|2p=3118}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mogul |first=Rhea |date=15 April 2024 |title=Narendra Modi: India's popular but controversial leader seeking a transformative third term |url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/15/india/modi-profile-india-election-intl-hnk-dst/index.html |access-date=19 May 2024 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mehrotra |first1=Karishma |last2=Shih |first2=Gerry |date=20 April 2024 |title=As India votes, women and the young could put Modi and BJP over the top |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/04/18/india-election-modi-women-youth/ |access-date=19 May 2024 |newspaper=] |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=30 October 2023 |title=Modi's Hindu Nationalist Agenda Is Corroding India's Democracy |url=https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/will-modi-hindu-nationalism-damage-us-india-relations/ |access-date=19 May 2024 |website=World Politics Review |language=en-US}}</ref> but has recently been described as ] or part of the radical right, a subset of the far-right that does not oppose democracy.<ref name="Davies">{{Cite book |last1=Davies |first1=Peter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1-iXGKN1AK4C&q=%22Bharatiya+Janata+Party%22%22far-right%22 |title=The Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right |last2=Lynch |first2=Derek |date=16 August 2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-60952-9 |pages=103 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Gill |first=Martin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZtJ2EAAAQBAJ&q=%22Bharatiya+Janata+Party%22%22far-right%22 |title=The Handbook of Security |date=2022-06-22 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-91735-7 |pages=158 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Leidig |first1=Eviane |last2=Mudde |first2=Cas |date=9 May 2023 |title=Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): The overlooked populist radical right party |url=https://benjamins.com/catalog/jlp.22134.lei |journal=Journal of Language and Politics |language=en |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=360–377 |doi=10.1075/jlp.22134.lei |issn=1569-2159}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ammassari |first1=Sofia |last2=Fossati |first2=Diego |last3=McDonnell |first3=Duncan |title=Supporters of India's BJP: Distinctly Populist and Nativist |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/abs/supporters-of-indias-bjp-distinctly-populist-and-nativist/3D2C84D6F81E1F9CCDD89654B40AB6E8 |journal=Government and Opposition |date=2023 |language=en |volume=58 |issue=4 |pages=807–823 |doi=10.1017/gov.2022.18 |issn=0017-257X}}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
=== Social policies and Hindutva === | |||
{{Conservatism sidebar}} | |||
{{Further|Hindutva}} | |||
The official philosophy of the BJP is "]," a philosophy first formulated by ] in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage."{{sfn|Hansen|1999|p=85}}{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} It is committed to ], an ideology articulated by ] activist ]. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over ], thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a Hindu nationalist party in a general sense.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}}{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} | |||
The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the ] temple at the ] of the ].{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} However, the ] during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in a backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the ] (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}} Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "]" Indian history.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}}{{sfn|International Religious Freedom Report|2005}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2002}}{{sfn|Davies|2005}} The NDA government introduced ] as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.{{sfn|BBC|January|2014}} | |||
Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions.<ref name="Orange Evolution">{{Cite news |date=2 March 2019 |title=Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul |newspaper=] |url=https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul |url-status=live |access-date=27 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190301125100/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul |archive-date=1 March 2019}}</ref> In 2014, ], who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the ] (ICHR).<ref name="Ganguly 2014">{{Cite journal |last=Ganguly |first=Sumit |date=October 2014 |title=India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead |journal=] |volume=25 |issue=4 |pages=56–60 |doi=10.1353/jod.2014.0077 |s2cid=154421269 }}</ref> Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.<ref name="Ganguly 2014" /><ref name="saffronisation">{{Cite news |last=Joshua |first=Anita |date=16 July 2014 |title=Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate |work=] |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |url-status=live |access-date=20 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141202181112/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |archive-date=2 December 2014}}</ref><ref name="right_wing">{{Cite news |last=Mukul |first=Akshaya |date=18 July 2014 |title=Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection |work=] |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |url-status=live |access-date=20 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140721002055/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |archive-date=21 July 2014}}</ref> Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars ] and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /> The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasizing the role of ], and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /><ref name="Bhatty 2019">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=School education: Denials and delusions |encyclopedia=A quantum leap in the wrong direction? |last=Bhatty |first=Kiran |date=2019 |editor-last=Azad |editor-first=Rohit |isbn=978-93-5287-618-1 |oclc=1089418969 |editor-last2=Chakraborty |editor-first2=Shouvik |editor-last3=Ramani |editor-first3=Srinivasan |editor-last4=Sinha |editor-first4=Dipa}}</ref> | |||
The BJP supports a ], which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505, |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310075212/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505, |archive-date=10 March 2021 |access-date=31 March 2021 |website=pib.gov.in}}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130063447/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/article-370-rendered-toothless-article-35a-ceases-to-exist/articleshow/70535292.cms |date=30 November 2021 }}, The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Gazette of India |url=http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190805094806/http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf |archive-date=5 August 2019 |access-date=6 March 2020}}</ref> the abrogation of ], which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its ].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} It simultaneously ], reorganizing it into two ], ] and ].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /> | |||
The BJP opposes ] from ].{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy and stability of the country.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}}{{sfn|Ramachandran|2003}} The party later became the party of government in Assam.<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 March 2021 |title=Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist |url=https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518010553/https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/ |archive-date=18 May 2021 |access-date=5 May 2021 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref> The Modi administration passed a ] in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for ] minorities from ], ] and ] who are ], ], ], ]s, ] or ].<ref name="BBC explained" /><ref name="PIBPassesBill" /> The law does not grant such eligibility to ].<ref name="CNNExcludes">{{Cite news |last1=Regan |first1=Helen |last2=Gupta |first2=Swati |last3=Khan |first3=Omar |title=India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims |publisher=CNN |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215224043/https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |archive-date=15 December 2019 |quote=The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries.}}</ref><ref name="NPRExcludes">{{Cite news |last=Gringlas |first=Sam |title=India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims |publisher=NPR |url=https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |url-status=live |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215032601/https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |archive-date=15 December 2019}}</ref><ref name="Washington Post" /> This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under ]: it attracted global ], and sparked widespread ] that were halted by the ].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /><ref name="Washington Post" />{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=33–50}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the ], caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.<ref name="guardian-3-16-20-1">{{Citation |last1=Ellis-Peterson |first1=Hannah |title=Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots |date=16 March 2020 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots |work=The Guardian |access-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317023019/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots |url-status=live |place=Delhi |archive-date=17 March 2020 |last2=Azizur Rahman |first2=Shaikh}}</ref><ref name="NYTimes-Analysis-March1">{{Citation |last1=Gettleman |first1=Jeffrey |title=In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse |date=1 March 2020 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=1 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200306120958/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html |url-status=live |archive-date=6 March 2020 |last2=Abi-Habib |first2=Maria}}</ref> Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.<ref name="nytimes-2020-3-12-two-thirds">{{Citation |last1=Gettleman |first1=Jeffrey |title='If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims |date=12 March 2020 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=13 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200313011029/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html |url-status=live |others=Photographs by Loke, Atul |archive-date=13 March 2020 |last2=Yasir |first2=Sameer |last3=Raj |first3=Suhasini |last4=Kumar |first4=Hari}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-6-20-slater-1">{{Citation |last1=Slater |first1=Joanna |title=In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn |date=6 March 2020 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=6 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200307070624/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html |url-status=live |archive-date=7 March 2020 |last2=Masih |first2=Niha}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-2-20-slater-1">{{Citation |last1=Slater |first1=Joanna |title=What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India |date=2 March 2020 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=15 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200303203132/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html |url-status=live |archive-date=3 March 2020 |last2=Masih |first2=Niha}}</ref> | |||
In 2013, the ] reinstated the controversial ], which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics, including Muslim religious leaders, stated that they supported the verdict.{{sfn|Times of India|2013}}{{sfn|Buncombe|2014}} BJP president ] said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural,{{sfn|Ramaseshan|2013}} though the party softened the stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections.{{sfn|Business Standard|2014}} The Modi government is opposed to ], stating in a legal affidavit that legalizing it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as 'husband', a biological woman as 'wife' and children born out of union".<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 February 2021 |title=Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman' |work=The Independent |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html |url-status=live |access-date=17 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117000847/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html |archive-date=17 January 2023}}</ref> | |||
=== Economic policies === | |||
{{Neoliberalism sidebar}} | |||
The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the ], it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported '']'' (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a ] export policy. However, it supported internal ], and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards ]. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch:{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its ''swadeshi'' ideology.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} | |||
The two NDA governments in the period 1998–2004 introduced significant deregulation and privatisation of government-owned enterprises. It also introduced tariff-reducing measures. These reforms built off of the initial economic liberalisation introduced by the P. V. Narasimha Rao-led Congress government in the early 1990s.{{sfn|Tiwari|2012}} India's GDP growth increased substantially during the tenure of the NDA. The 2004 campaign slogan ] was based on the party's belief that the free market would bring prosperity to all sectors of society.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=710–720}} After its unexpected defeat, commentators said that it was punished for neglecting the needs of the poor and focusing too much on its corporate allies.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2004}}{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=70}} | |||
This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years.{{sfn|Sheela Bhatt|2014}} Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}}{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|pp=79–95}} Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}} | |||
The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a ] framework.<ref name="Ruparelia">{{Cite journal |last=Ruparelia |first=Sanjay |date=12 January 2016 |title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India |journal=Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=755–775 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974 |issn=0085-6401 |s2cid=155182560}}</ref><ref name="Shah & Lerche">{{Cite journal |last1=Shah |first1=Alpa |last2=Lerche |first2=Jens |date=10 October 2015 |title=India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion |url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html |url-status=live |journal=] |volume=50 |issue=41 |pages=33–36 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328113150/https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html |archive-date=28 March 2023 |access-date=18 March 2023}}</ref> Modi liberalised India's ] policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways.<ref name="Ruparelia" /><ref>{{Cite news |date=7 August 2014 |title=Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways |work=] |url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector |url-status=dead |access-date=27 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150807044440/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector |archive-date=7 August 2015 |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Zhong |first=Raymond |date=20 November 2014 |title=Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough? |work=] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 |url-status=live |access-date=29 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329123224/http://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 |archive-date=29 March 2016 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them;<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> some of these proposals were dropped after protests.<ref name="ET March 2018">{{Cite news |date=14 March 2018 |title=Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls |work=] |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |url-status=live |access-date=6 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209124121/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |archive-date=9 February 2019}}</ref> The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> The ], a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers.<ref name="Ruparelia" /> Modi has been described as taking a more economically ] approach on healthcare and agricultural policy.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind |work=] |url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind |url-status=live |access-date=20 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180820174144/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind |archive-date=20 August 2018}}</ref> Modi's government has also been described as taking a more ] turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the ] talks<ref>{{Cite news |date=15 November 2020 |title=Why India opted out of world's biggest today |work=] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114124257/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms |archive-date=14 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=3 December 2020 |title=Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa |work=] |url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103080258/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa |archive-date=3 January 2021 |quote=India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism.}}</ref> and introducing the 2020 ] economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.<ref>{{Cite news |date=23 November 2020 |title=Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era |work=] |url=https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |archive-date=10 December 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=19 February 2020 |title=India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn |work=] |url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64 |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303220412/https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64 |archive-date=3 March 2021}}</ref> | |||
=== Defence and counterterrorism === | |||
Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the ], which later came under heavy criticism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States ].{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}} | |||
Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised ], a series of five nuclear tests in 1998.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}} The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}} | |||
The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying ] territory, later known as the ].{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}} Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}} | |||
After the ] in December 2001, the NDA government passed the ].{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It initially failed to pass in the ]; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a ] of the Parliament, where the numerical superior ] allowed the bill to pass.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon ], and the ] stated that it had been used to target Muslims.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.{{sfn|Times of India|2002}} | |||
The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a ] against the ], the ] in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the ] in Pakistan.<ref>{{Cite news |date=11 July 2018 |title=Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar |work=] |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms |url-status=live |access-date=25 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118052537/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms |archive-date=18 January 2021}}</ref> It also militarily intervened in defence of ] during the ] with China.<ref>{{Cite news |date=14 October 2017 |title=Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered? |work=] |url=https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained |url-status=live |access-date=25 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201027203809/https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained |archive-date=27 October 2020}}</ref> | |||
The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mukherjee |first=Anit |date=5 May 2021 |title=The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military |url=https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065208/https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |archive-date=6 November 2022 |access-date=6 November 2022 |website=War on the Rocks |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=8 April 2019 |title=BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways |language=en |work=] |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |url-status=live |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065206/https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |archive-date=6 November 2022}}</ref> In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the ] to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War.<ref>{{Cite news |date=16 August 2019 |title=Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech |language=en |work=] |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |url-status=live |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927070751/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |archive-date=27 September 2019}}</ref> The ] was also established and put under the CDS.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Singh |first=Rahul |date=24 December 2019 |title=Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff |language=en |work=] |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |url-status=live |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221003170252/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |archive-date=3 October 2022}}</ref> | |||
=== Foreign policy === | |||
The historical stance of the BJP towards ], like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on an aggressive ] combined with economic protectionism.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the ]; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of ], and instead advocated closeness to the United States.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Inbar |first=Efraim |title=US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2016 |page=155}}</ref> while stressing a desire for a more ] world order.<ref>{{Cite news |date=19 September 2020 |title=Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar |work=] |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124010145/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece |archive-date=24 November 2020}}</ref> Despite this, it has accused the ] and "]" elements in the United States of attempting to destabilise India.<ref>{{cite news|work=Reuters|date=6 December 2024|title=Modi's BJP says US State Department targeting India|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/india/modis-bjp-says-us-state-department-targeting-india-2024-12-06/}}</ref> | |||
The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} Its policy also represented a significant change from the ] of previous governments, opting instead for realism.{{sfn|Lall|2006}} His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the ] service.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Vajpayee signed the ], which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the ]. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the ] that marked the ''de facto'' border between the two countries.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak".{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil ], preventing any significant deal from being reached. {{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} | |||
The Vajpayee government strongly opposed the 1999 ], with Vajpayee describing it as a "dance of destruction".<ref>Pradhan, Sharat. . {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081118134331/https://www.rediff.com/news/1999/mar/29nato.htm |date=18 November 2008}}. '']'', 29 March 1999.</ref><ref>Faiola, Anthony. . {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180315020414/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/balkans/stories/anger051899.htm|date=15 March 2018}}. '']'', 18 May 1999.</ref> The Vajpayee administration later offered political support to the U.S. ], in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons.{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}} However, the BJP strongly condemned the ], stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq".<ref>{{Cite news |date=5 April 2003 |title=BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War |work=Arab News |url=https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278 |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901100757/https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278 |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref> The BJP also opposed the ] and urged the ] to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.<ref>{{Cite news |date=23 March 2011 |title=Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs |work=] |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901101324/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref> | |||
The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with ]'s government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015.<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 December 2015 |title=India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit |work=] |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594 |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210211014845/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594 |archive-date=11 February 2021}}</ref> Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017.<ref>{{Cite news |date=18 December 2020 |title=PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death |work=] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201222092117/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms |archive-date=22 December 2020}}</ref> The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy.<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 February 2019 |title=The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand? |work=Scroll.in |url=https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310074955/https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand |archive-date=10 March 2021}}</ref> In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=15 November 2015 |title=Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade |work=] |url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695 |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108132725/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695 |archive-date=8 November 2020}}</ref> The Modi government expressed concern following the ], but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a ] resolution regarding the situation there.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Martin |first=Michael |date=22 November 2021 |title=Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta |url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192530/https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta |archive-date=30 January 2023 |access-date=30 January 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Haidar |first=Suhasini |date=22 December 2022 |title=India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy |work=The Hindu |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece |url-status=live |access-date=30 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192526/https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece |archive-date=30 January 2023}}</ref> The Modi government remained neutral on the ],<ref>{{Cite news |date=10 March 2022 |title=Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers |work=Livemint |url=https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html |url-status=live |access-date=13 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230113134704/https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html |archive-date=13 January 2023}}</ref> abstaining from ], which condemned the ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 February 2022 |title=Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China' |work=] |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref> The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.<ref>{{Cite news |date=3 March 2022 |title=Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions |work=] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref> | |||
===Disinformation and conspiracy theories=== | |||
The BJP has frequently spread disinformation and relied on Muslim demonisation.<ref name="x215">{{cite web | last=Bhattacharyya | first=Indradeep | title=BJP's 2024 poll campaign is riding on disinformation and Muslim vilification | website=Alt News | date=2024-05-01 | url=https://www.altnews.in/bjps-2024-poll-campaign-is-riding-on-disinformation-and-muslim-vilification/ | access-date=2024-12-10}}</ref> The use of fake news has been a part of the party's strategy. In September 2018, ] said at a party meeting in Rajasthan that the BJP IT cell had influenced the media during the 2017 Uttar Pradesh elections and added that, "We should be capable of delivering any message to the public, whether sweet or sour, true or fake."<ref name="q786">{{cite book | last=Jaffrelot | first=Christophe | last2=Schoch | first2=C. | title=Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy | publisher=Princeton University Press | year=2023 | isbn=978-0-691-24790-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-fuUEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA329 | access-date=2024-12-10 | page=329}}</ref> | |||
On April 2024, the US department criticised the BJP for promoting ] conspiracy theories involving ].<ref name="s195">{{cite web | title=US State Dept Accuses India of Anti-Semitism for Pushing Conspiracies Against George Soros | website=The Wire | date=2023-10-06 | url=https://thewire.in/government/us-state-dept-accuses-india-of-anti-semitism-for-pushing-conspiracies-against-george-soros | access-date=2024-12-10}}</ref> | |||
In December 2024, the French newspaper ] condemned the BJP for falsifying its reports and added that, "There are no facts available supporting the conspiracy theory promoted by BJP".<ref name="z245">{{cite web | author=The Hindu Bureau | title=BJP spreading ‘fake news’, says French media house Mediapart | website=The Hindu | date=2024-12-09 | url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bjp-spreading-fake-news-says-french-media-house/article68966777.ece | access-date=2024-12-10}}</ref> | |||
== Organisation and structure == | |||
]]] | |||
{{Main|Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
{{Further|List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
The organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the ] being the highest authority in the party.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.{{sfn|Times of India|2012}} | |||
Below the president is the ], which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other ]-related organisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the ]:{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The ] (''All India Students' Union''), the students' wing of the RSS{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The ] (''Indian Farmer's Union''), the farmers' division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The ] (''Indian Labourers Union''), the labour union associated with the RSS{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as: | |||
* The BJP Mahila Morcha (''BJP Women's Front''), its women's division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The ] (''Indian People's Youth Front''), its youth wing{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The BJP Minority Morcha (''BJP Minority Front''), its minority division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-10-16 |title=BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party |language=en-UK |work=Sydney Morning Herald |url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701075444/https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |archive-date=1 July 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-04-16 |title=How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades |language=en-IN |work=] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230628205517/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |archive-date=28 June 2023}}</ref> as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-06-23 |title=Narendra Modi's Message to America |language=en-US |work=National Review |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701084716/https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |archive-date=1 July 2023 |quote="His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or "Indian People's Party") is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development."}}</ref> In September 2024, PM Modi initiated the BJP membership drive,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bjp-membership-drive-from-september-1-usually-precedes-polls-to-elect-party-chief/article68537254.ece|title=BJP membership drive from September 1, usually precedes polls to elect party chief|date=2024-08-17|website=The Hindu|access-date=2024-09-24}}</ref> this campaign has been controversial for deceptive and coercive membership enrollment by BJP workers.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/india/madhya-pradesh/madhya-pradesh-man-claims-he-was-thrashed-for-refusing-to-become-bjp-member-4-booked-3194800|title=Madhya Pradesh: Man claims he was thrashed for refusing to become BJP member; 4 booked|website=Deccan Herald}}</ref> In Gujarat, minor school children have been enrolled as BJP members<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gujarat/bjp-membership-drive-hits-controversies-in-gujarat/article68657001.ece|first=Mahesh|last=Langa|date=2024-09-19|access-date=2024-09-24|website=The Hindu|title=BJP membership drive hits controversies in Gujarat}}</ref> | |||
== General election results == | |||
{{See also|Electoral history of the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
The Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two ] seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the ] whenever the party was not in power.{{sfn|National Informatics Centre|2014}}{{efn|For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.}} | |||
{{Clear|left}} | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Year | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Legislature | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|Party leader | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Seats contested | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Seats won | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Change in seats | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Percentage<br />of votes | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Vote swing | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Outcome | |||
! class="unsortable" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Ref. | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| 229 | |||
|{{Composition bar|2|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 2 | |||
| 7.74% | |||
| ''New'' | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1984}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
|rowspan=2| ] | |||
| 225 | |||
|{{Composition bar|85|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 83 | |||
| 11.36% | |||
| {{increase}} 3.62% | |||
| {{partial|] for ]}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1989}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| 477 | |||
|{{Composition bar|120|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 35 | |||
| 20.11% | |||
| {{increase}} 8.75% | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1991}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
|rowspan=4|] | |||
| 471 | |||
|{{Composition bar|161|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 41 | |||
| 20.29% | |||
| {{increase}} 0.18% | |||
| {{partial|Coalition, later opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1996}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| 388 | |||
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 21 | |||
| 25.59% | |||
| {{increase}} 5.30% | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1998}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| 339 | |||
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{steady}} | |||
| 23.75% | |||
| {{decrease}} 1.84% | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1999}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| 364 | |||
|{{Composition bar|138|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{decrease}} 44 | |||
| 22.16% | |||
| {{decrease}} 1.69% | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2004}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
|] | |||
| 433 | |||
|{{Composition bar|116|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{decrease}} 22 | |||
| 18.80% | |||
| {{decrease}} 3.36% | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2009}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
|rowspan=3|] | |||
| 428 | |||
|{{Composition bar|282|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 166 | |||
| 31.34% | |||
| {{increase}} 12.54% | |||
| {{yes2|Majority}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2014}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| 436 | |||
|{{Composition bar|303|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 21 | |||
| 37.46% | |||
|{{increase}} 6.12% | |||
| {{yes2|Majority}} | |||
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kumar |first=Sanjay |date=28 May 2019 |title=BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers |work=] |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms |url-status=live |access-date=14 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203005824/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms |archive-date=3 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=20. Performance of National Parties |url=https://old.eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107073533/https://eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/ |archive-date=7 January 2021 |access-date=21 December 2020 |website=Election Commission of India}}</ref> | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| 441 | |||
|{{Composition bar|240|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{decrease}} 63 | |||
| 36.56% | |||
|{{decrease}} 0.8% | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
==Presence in states and Union Territories== | |||
] | |||
The BJP has previously held power in ], ] and ], and has been the junior coalition partner in governments in ] (with the ]), ] (with the ]), and ] (with the ]). It has never held power in ], ], and ].{{cn|date=November 2024}} | |||
In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the ].<ref name="thewire.in-25May16">{{Cite web |last=Pisharoty |first=Sangeeta Barooah |date=25 May 2016 |title=BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt' |url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526113451/http://thewire.in/2016/05/25/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt-38680/ |archive-date=26 May 2016 |website=]}}</ref><ref name="hindustantimes.com">{{Cite web |date=25 May 2016 |title=Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526061921/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html |archive-date=26 May 2016}}</ref><ref name="ndtv.com">{{Cite web |title=BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge |url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160525135628/http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824 |archive-date=25 May 2016}}</ref> | |||
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;" | |||
!Colspan=4|Lower House | |||
|- | |- | ||
!Legislature | |||
! Year | |||
!Seats | |||
! colspan="2" | Name | |||
!Legislative leader | |||
! Place | |||
!Status | |||
! Rationale | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 1980 - 1986 | |||
|{{Composition bar|8|175|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
|] | |||
| ] | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
| ], ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 1986 - 1991 | |||
|{{Composition bar|46|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
| ], ] | |||
| First Term | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 1991 - 1993 | |||
|{{Composition bar|64|126|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
| ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 1993 - 1998 | |||
|{{Composition bar|82|243|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
| ], ] | |||
| Second Term | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 1998 - 2000 | |||
|{{Composition bar|54|90|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
| ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 2000 - 2001 | |||
|{{Composition bar|7|70|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{no2|Opposition}} | |||
| ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 2001 - 2002 | |||
|{{Composition bar|28|40|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
| ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 2002 - 2004 | |||
|{{Composition bar|162|182|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
| ], ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |||
| 2004 - 2006 | |||
|{{Composition bar|48|90|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
| ], ] | |||
| Third Term | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
| 2006 - 2009 | |||
] | |||
| ] | |||
|{{Composition bar|27|68|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |
|] | ||
|{{no2|Opposition}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|28|90|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|21|81|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|'''TBA''' | |||
|{{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|66|224|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|0|140|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|Colspan=2 Bgcolor=#CDCDCD|No Representation | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|165|230|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|132|288|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|37|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|2|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|2|40|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{partial|Others}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|12|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|78|147|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|9|33|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|2|117|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{partial|Others}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|119|200|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|0|32|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|Bgcolor=#CDCDCD|No Representation | |||
|{{yes2|Alliance}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|4|234|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{partial|Others}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|8|119|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|Alleti Maheshwar Reddy | |||
|{{partial|Others}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|33|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|257|403|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|47|70|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|66|294|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|- | |||
!Colspan=4|Upper House | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|{{Composition bar|95|245|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|{{Composition bar|0|58|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|Bgcolor=#CDCDCD|No Representation | |||
|{{yes2|Coalition}} | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|{{Composition bar|24|75|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|30|75|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|19|78|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|1|40|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|A.Venkata Narayana Reddy | |||
|{{partial|Others}} | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
] | |||
|{{Composition bar|82|100|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
|] | |||
|{{yes2|Government}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 2009- | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ], ] | |||
| | |||
|} | |} | ||
== List of heads of government == | |||
=== List of prime ministers === | |||
{{further|List of prime ministers of India}} | |||
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;" | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="2"|No. | |||
!rowspan="2"|Portrait | |||
!rowspan="2"|Prime minister | |||
!rowspan="2"|Constituency | |||
!colspan="3"|Term in office | |||
!rowspan="2"|Lok Sabha | |||
!rowspan="2"|Cabinet | |||
|- | |||
!Start | |||
!End | |||
!Tenure | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="3"|1 | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|16 May 1996 | |||
|1 June 1996 | |||
|{{ayd|16 May 1996|1 June 1996}} | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"|19 March 1998 | |||
|rowspan="2"|22 May 2004 | |||
|rowspan="2"|{{ayd|19 March 1998|22 May 2004}} | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="3" |2 | |||
| rowspan="3" |] | |||
| rowspan="3" |] | |||
| rowspan="3" |] | |||
| rowspan="3" |26 May 2014 | |||
| rowspan="3" |'''''Incumbent''''' | |||
| rowspan="3" |{{ayd|26 May 2014}} | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== List of incumbent chief ministers === | |||
] | |||
{{Main|List of chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
{{As of|2024|12|04}}, 54 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 14 of whom are incumbent. | |||
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center" | |||
|+Incumbent Chief Ministers from the BJP | |||
!No. | |||
!State | |||
!Portrait | |||
!Name | |||
!Cabinet | |||
!colspan="2"|Governing coalition | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="2"|1 | |||
|rowspan="2"|] | |||
|rowspan="2"|] | |||
|rowspan="2"|] | |||
|Rowspan=2|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|{{Party color cell|National People's Party (India)}} | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="3"|2 | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|Rowspan=3|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|{{Party color cell|Asom Gana Parishad}} | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|{{Party color cell|United People's Party Liberal}} | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
!3 | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="3"|4 | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|rowspan="3"|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|{{Party color cell|Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party}} | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|bgcolor=CDCDCD| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
!5 | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
!6 | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
!7 | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="8"|8 | |||
|rowspan="8"|] | |||
|rowspan="8"|] | |||
|rowspan="8"|] | |||
|rowspan="8"|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|{{Party color cell|Shiv Sena}} | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|{{Party color cell|Nationalist Congress Party}} | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|bgcolor=#CB00F1| | |||
|JSS | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor=#FFFF00| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor=#1A34BB| | |||
|RYSP | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor=#F58E7D| | |||
|RSVA | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor=#CDCDCD| | |||
| ] | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="4"|9 | |||
|rowspan="4"|] | |||
|rowspan="4"|] | |||
|rowspan="4"|] | |||
|Rowspan=4|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:#DB7093| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:#906;"| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:#CDCDCD;"| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
!10 | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
!11 | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
!rowspan="2"|12 | |||
|rowspan="2"|] | |||
|rowspan="2"|] | |||
|rowspan="2"|] | |||
|rowspan="2"|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:green;"| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
!Rowspan="4"|13 | |||
|rowspan="4"|] | |||
|rowspan="4"|] | |||
|rowspan="4"|] | |||
|Rowspan=4|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:#306;"| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:green"| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:#b80000;"| | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
!14 | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|] | |||
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== See also == | |||
{{div col|colwidth=40em}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== References == | |||
=== Explanatory notes === | |||
{{Notelist|30em}} | |||
=== Citations === | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
=== General and cited sources === | |||
{{Refbegin|30em}} | |||
<!-- ToDo: Re-organize A->Z by last names --> | |||
* {{Citation |last=Sharma |first=Chetna |title=Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016: Continuities and contestations with special reference to politics in Assam, India |journal=Asian Ethnicity |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=522–540 |year=2019 |doi=10.1080/14631369.2019.1601993 |s2cid=150837053}} | |||
* {{Citation |last=Sen |first=Uditi |title=Citizen Refugee: Forging the Indian Nation after Partition |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |year=2018 |access-date=16 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061242/https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |url-status=live |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-42561-2 |archive-date=14 April 2023}} | |||
* {{Citation |last=Jayal |first=Niraja Gopal |title=Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=33–50 |year=2019 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874 |doi-access=free}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Abbas |first=Hassan |url=https://archive.org/details/pakistansdriftin00hass |title=Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7656-1497-1 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Uproar over India mosque report: Inquiry into Babri mosque's demolition in 1992 indicts opposition BJP leaders |url = http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |access-date = 8 July 2014 |work = Al Jazeera |date = 24 November 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Al Jazeera |2009}} |archive-date = 31 January 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100131082341/http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Banerjee |first1 = Sumanta |title = Civilising the BJP |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 22 July 2005 |volume = 40 |issue = 29 |pages = 3116–3119 |jstor = 4416896 }} | |||
* {{cite news |url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |title = Narendra Modi sworn in as Indian prime minister |date = 26 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |work = BBC News |ref = {{harvid |BBC |May |2014}} |archive-date = 2 July 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180702163012/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Indian Astrology vs Indian Science |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223838/http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |archive-date=20 October 2014 |access-date=17 January 2014 |publisher=BBC World Service |ref={{harvid|BBC|January|2014}}}} | |||
* {{cite news |last1 = Bhatt |first1 = Sheela |title = What Anandiben Patel is really like |url = http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Rediff |ref = {{harvid |Sheela Bhatt |2014}} |archive-date = 23 June 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140623212643/http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Bobbio |first = Tommaso |title = Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India |journal = Third World Quarterly |year = 2012 |volume = 33 |issue = 4 |pages = 653–668 |doi = 10.1080/01436597.2012.657423 |s2cid = 154422056 |url = https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |access-date = 29 June 2019 |archive-date = 1 March 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200301151004/https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |title = The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India |last = Brass |first = Paul R. |publisher = University of Washington Press |year = 2005 |isbn = 978-0-295-98506-0 |pages = 385–393}} | |||
* {{cite news |last1 = Buncombe |first1 = Andrew |title = India's gay community scrambling after court decision recriminalises homosexuality |url = https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/indias-gay-community-scrambling-after-court-decision-recriminalises-homosexuality-9146244.html |access-date = 11 July 2014 |work = The Independent |date = 11 July 2014 |archive-date = 5 September 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140905153333/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/indias-gay-community-scrambling-after-court-decision-recriminalises-homosexuality-9146244.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = It is the govt.'s responsibility to protect LGBT rights, says Harsh Vardhan |url = http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |access-date = 19 July 2014 |work = Business Standard |date = 17 July 2014 |location = Mumbai, India |ref = {{harvid |Business Standard |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223853/http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Chaulia |first = Sreeram |s2cid = 144714683 |title = BJP, India's Foreign Policy and the "Realist Alternative" to the Nehruvian Tradition |journal = International Politics |date = June 2002 |volume = 39 |issue = 2 |pages = 215–234 |doi = 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8897388}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |year=2005 |title=The Cultural Background of Hindutva |encyclopedia=India Briefing; Takeoff at Last? |publisher=Asia Society |last=Davies |first=Richard |editor-last=Ayres & Oldenburg |editor-first=Alyssa & Philip}} | |||
* {{Cite web |date=20 May 2014 |title=Narendra Modi to be sworn in as 15th Prime Minister of India on May 26 |url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140527225918/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today |archive-date=27 May 2014 |access-date=26 May 2014 |website=] |ref={{harvid|Deccan Chronicle|2014}}}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Diwakar |first = Rekha |title = The 16th general election in India, April–May 2014 |journal = Electoral Studies |volume = 37 |year = 2014 |pages = 1–6 |doi = 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.005}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=General Election to Lok Sabha Trends and Results |url=http://eciresults.nic.in/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141218160549/http://eciresults.nic.in/ |archive-date=18 December 2014 |access-date=18 June 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2014}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |year=2013 |title=List of Political Parties and Election Symbols main Notification Dated 18 January 2013 |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024171915/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2013 |access-date=9 May 2013 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2013}} |location=India}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1984 to the Eighth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718184911/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=18 July 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1984}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1989 to the Ninth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183934/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=18 July 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1989}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183558/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=18 July 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1991}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183504/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1996}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718181833/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1998}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183222/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1999}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 2004 to the Fourteenth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718190634/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2004}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Performance of National Parties |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171209173959/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |archive-date=9 December 2017 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2009}}}} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Fitzgerald |first = Timothy |title = Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth |date = 2011 |publisher = A&C Black |isbn = 978-1-4411-4290-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061250/https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Flint |first = Colin |title = The geography of war and peace |publisher = Oxford University Press |year = 2005 |isbn = 978-0-19-516208-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061243/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Ganguly |first1 = Sumit |s2cid = 57565560 |title = India's Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program |journal = International Security |date =Spring 1999 |volume = 23 |issue = 4 |pages = 148–177 |jstor = 2539297 |doi = 10.1162/isec.23.4.148}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Ghassem-Fachandi |first1 = Parvis |title = Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India |date = 2012 |publisher = Princeton University Press |isbn = 978-0-691-15177-9 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=p5s8hooZfekC }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Gillan |first = Michael |s2cid = 146522066 |title = Refugees or Infiltrators? The Bharatiya Janata Party and "Illegal" Migration from Bangladesh |journal = Asian Studies Review |date = March 2002 |volume = 26 |issue = 1 |pages = 73–95 |doi = 10.1080/10357820208713331}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Guha |first1 = Ramachandra |author-link = Ramachandra Guha |title = India after Gandhi: the history of the world's largest democracy |date = 2007 |publisher = Picador |location = India |isbn = 978-0-330-39610-3 |edition = 1st|title-link = India after Gandhi }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Gupta |first = Dipankar |title = Justice before Reconciliation: Negotiating a 'New Normal' in Post-riot Mumbai and Ahmedabad |year = 2011 |publisher = Routledge |isbn = 978-0-415-61254-8 |page = 34}} | |||
* {{cite news |first = Samar |last = Halarnkar |title = Narendra Modi makes his move |work = BBC News |date = 13 June 2012 |url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18352532 |quote = The right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), India's primary opposition party |ref = {{harvid |BBC |2012}} |access-date = 21 June 2018 |archive-date = 8 March 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210308014030/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18352532 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Hansen |first = Thomas |title = The saffron wave : democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India |publisher = Princeton University Press |location = Princeton, NJ |year = 1999 |isbn = 978-0-691-00671-0 }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Harris |first = Gardiner |title = Justice and 'a Ray of Hope' After 2002 India Riots |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/world/asia/gujarat-riot-trials-may-alter-indias-cycle-of-violence.html |work = The New York Times |access-date = 25 February 2014 |date = 2 July 2012 |archive-date = 7 April 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140407115729/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/world/asia/gujarat-riot-trials-may-alter-indias-cycle-of-violence.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Harris |first = Jerry |s2cid = 154768728 |title = Emerging Third World powers: China, India and Brazil |journal = Race & Class |year = 2005 |volume = 46 |issue = 7 |pages = 7–27 |doi = 10.1177/0306396805050014}} | |||
* {{cite news |title = The Meaning of Verdict 2004 |url = http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/14/stories/2004051406131000.htm |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20040916145623/http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/14/stories/2004051406131000.htm |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 September 2004 |access-date = 10 December 2013 |date = 14 May 2004 |location = Chennai, India |work = ] |ref = {{harvid |The Hindu |2004}} }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Inventing History |work= The Hindu |date = 14 October 2002 |ref = {{harvid |The Hindu |2002}}}} | |||
* {{cite news |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131230070038/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 30 December 2013 |title = Modi did not incite riots: SIT |work = Hindustan Times |access-date = 22 January 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2014}} }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = 2009 Lok Sabha election: Final results tally |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/2009-lok-sabha-election-final-results-tally/article1-411793.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130611071616/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/2009-Lok-Sabha-election-Final-results-tally/Article1-411793.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 11 June 2013 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Hindustan Times |date = 17 May 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2009}} }} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Tehelka sting: How Bangaru Laxman fell for the trap |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120514204516/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html |archive-date=14 May 2012 |access-date=9 May 2012 |website=] |date=27 April 2012 |ref={{harvid|India Today|2001}}}} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher = C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year = 1996 |isbn = 978-1-85065-301-1 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class |journal = Studies in Indian Politics |date = June 2013 |volume = 1 |pages = 2–27 |doi = 10.1177/2321023013482789|s2cid = 154404089 }} | |||
* {{cite news |last1 = Jha |first1 = Nilanjana Bhaduri |title = Survey shows temple remains in Ayodhya: VHP |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Survey-shows-temple-remains-in-Ayodhya-VHP/articleshow/38195328.cms |access-date = 11 July 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 21 February 2003 |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223815/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Survey-shows-temple-remains-in-Ayodhya-VHP/articleshow/38195328.cms |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Bangaru Laxman convicted of taking bribe |url = http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |work = ] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |first = Jiby |last = Kattakayam |date = 27 April 2012 |location = Chennai, India |archive-date = 1 May 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120501113222/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Krishnan |first1 = Jayanth |title = India's "Patriot Act": POTA and the Impact on Civil Liberties in the World's Largest Democracy |journal = Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice |date = 2004 |volume = 22 |issue = 2 |pages = 265–300 |url = http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379 |issn = 2767-1992 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |archive-date = 28 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140728192217/http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379/ |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Krishnan |first = Murali |title = Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims |url = http://www.dw.de/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |publisher = Deutsche Welle |date = 11 March 2012 |author2 = Shamil Shams |ref = {{harvid |Krishnan |2012}} |access-date = 20 December 2013 |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223515/http://www.dw.de/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Kux |first1 = Dennis |title = India's Fine Balance |journal = Foreign Affairs |date = May–June 2002 |volume = 81 |issue = 3 |pages = 93–106 |jstor = 20033165 |doi = 10.2307/20033165}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Lall |first1 = Marie |title = Indo-Myanmar Relations in the Era of Pipeline Diplomacy |journal = Contemporary Southeast Asia |date = December 2006 |volume = 28 |issue = 3|pages = 424–446 |doi = 10.1355/CS28-3D |doi-broken-date = 13 November 2024 |s2cid = 154093220 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Malik |first1 = Yogendra K. |last2 = Singh |first2 = V.B. |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: An Alternative to the Congress (I)? |journal = Asian Survey |date = April 1992 |volume = 32 |issue = 4 |pages = 318–336 |jstor = 2645149 |doi = 10.2307/2645149}} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Mathew |first = Liz |url = http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |title = Narendra Modi makes election history as BJP gets majority on its own |work = ] |date = 16 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |archive-date = 27 May 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140527035606/http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Naqvi |first1 = Saba |last2 = Raman |first2 = Anuradha |journal = Outlook |title = Their Dark Glasses |date = 1 April 2013 |url = http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |ref = {{harvid |Outlook |2013}} |access-date = 23 May 2015 |archive-date = 21 December 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151221141359/http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Lok Sabha at a glance |url=http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140521205101/http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |archive-date=21 May 2014 |access-date=17 July 2014 |publisher=National Informatics Centre |ref={{harvid|National Informatics Centre|2014}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Report: Sequence of events on December 6 |url=http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100926132622/http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |archive-date=26 September 2010 |access-date=20 June 2012 |publisher=NDTV |ref={{harvid|NDTV|2012}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Naroda Patiya riots: Former minister Maya Kodnani gets 28 years in jail |url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-18-years-in-jail-261251 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226045146/https://www.ndtv.com/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-28-years-in-jail-498222 |archive-date=26 December 2018 |access-date=17 November 2012 |publisher=NDTV.com |ref={{harvid|NDTV.com|2012}}}} | |||
* {{cite journal |first = A. G. |last = Noorani |title = Foreign Policy of the Janata Party Government |journal = Asian Affairs |volume = 5 |date = March–April 1978 |pages = 216–228 |jstor = 30171643 |issue = 4 |doi = 10.1080/00927678.1978.10554044}} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Nussbaum |first = Martha Craven |title = The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future |year = 2008 |publisher = Harvard University Press |isbn = 978-0-674-03059-6 |page = 2}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Pai |first1 = Sudha |title = Transformation of the Indian Party System: The 1996 Lok Sabha Elections |journal = Asian Survey |date = December 1996 |volume = 36 |issue = 12 |pages = 1170–1183 |jstor = 2645573 |doi = 10.2307/2645573}} | |||
* {{Cite web |last=Qadir |first=Shaukat |date=April 2002 |title=An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999 |url=http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120655/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |archive-date=27 March 2009 |access-date=20 May 2009 |website=RUSI Journal}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Ramachandran |first = Sujata |title = 'Operation Pushback' Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 15 February 2003 |volume = 38 |issue = 7 |pages = 637–647 |jstor = 4413218 }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Ramaseshan |first = Radhika |title = BJP comes out, vows to oppose homosexuality |url = http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131216103934/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 December 2013 |access-date = 16 December 2013 |work = The Telegraph |date = 14 December 2013 |location = Calcutta, India }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Ramesh |first = Randeep |title = News World news Shock defeat for India's Hindu nationalists |url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |access-date = 10 December 2013 |work = The Guardian |date = 14 May 2004 |archive-date = 12 June 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180612144006/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=TDP helps Vajpayee wins confidence vote |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100502104757/http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |archive-date=2 May 2010 |access-date=4 January 2011 |website=Rediff.com |ref={{harvid|rediff.com|1998}}}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Sen |first1 = Amartya |title = India and the world. |date = 2005 |publisher = 2005. |location = Allen Lane |isbn = 978-0-7139-9687-6 |edition = 1. publ.}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Seshia |first = Shaila |title = Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |journal = Asian Survey |date = November 1998 |volume = 38 |issue = 11 |pages = 1036–1050 |doi = 10.2307/2645684|jstor = 2645684 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Shulman |first = Stephen |title = Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration |journal = International Studies Quarterly |date = September 2000 |volume = 44 |issue = 3 |pages = 365–390 |doi = 10.1111/0020-8833.00164}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Sridharan |first = Eswaran |title = India's Watershed Vote |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014 |doi = 10.1353/jod.2014.0068 |s2cid = 154669666 |url = https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |access-date = 23 April 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150112142754/https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |archive-date = 12 January 2015 |url-status = dead }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Swain |first1 = Pratap Chandra |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: Profile and Performance |date = 2001 |publisher = APH publishing |location = India |isbn = 978-81-7648-257-8 |pages = 71–104 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |access-date = 5 July 2014 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061228/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=Bangaru Laxman convicted for taking bribe |url=http://www.tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511094603/http://tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |archive-date=11 May 2012 |access-date=9 May 2012 |website=] |ref={{harvid|Tehelka|2001}}}} | |||
* {{Cite web |date=17 May 2014 |title=Election results 2014: India places its faith in Moditva |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223225/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |archive-date=20 October 2014 |access-date=11 August 2014 |publisher=Timesofindia.indiatimes.com |ref={{harvid|Times of India|2014}}}} | |||
* {{cite news |url = https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/SP-condemns-Vaikos-arrest-under-Pota/articleshow/15884672.cms |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120916205038/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-07-13/mumbai/27289812_1_vaiko-pota-prevention-of-terrorism-act |url-status = live |archive-date = 16 September 2012 |title = SP condemns Vaiko's arrest under Pota |date = 13 July 2002 |work = ] |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2002}} }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = BJP amends constitution allowing Gadkari to get a second term |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |access-date = 4 April 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 28 September 2012 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2012}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223443/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Stand with RSS, BJP |url = http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |access-date = 13 March 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 20 December 2013 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2013}} |archive-date = 13 March 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140313193845/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |url-status = dead }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Chatterjee |first = Mohua |url = http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |title = BJP enrolls 11 crore members, launches 'Mahasampark Abhiyan' |work = First Post |date = 13 July 2015 |ref = {{harvid |First Post |2015}} |access-date = 14 July 2015 |archive-date = 24 September 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150924144320/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Tiwari |first1 = Aviral Kumar |title = An Error-Correction Analysis of India-Us Trade Flows |journal = Journal of Economic Development |date = March 2012 |volume = 37 |issue = 1}} | |||
* {{Cite web |title=India: International Religious Freedom Report |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703181658/https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |archive-date=3 July 2017 |access-date=11 August 2014 |publisher=US Department of state |ref={{harvid|International Religious Freedom Report|2005}}}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |year=2007 |title=Hindu Nationalism: A Reader |publisher=] |location=Delhi |last=Vajpayee |first=Atal Bihari |editor-last=Jaffrelot |editor-first=Christophe |editor-link=Christophe Jaffrelot |isbn=978-0-691-13098-9}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Varshney |first = Ashutosh |s2cid = 144608424 |title = Hindu Nationalism in Power? |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014|pages = 34–45 |doi = 10.1353/jod.2014.0071 }} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
{{Refbegin|30em}} | |||
{{Main|Bibliography of the Sangh Parivar}} | |||
* {{cite book|first=Gurdas M.|last=Ahuja|title=Bharatiya Janata Party and Resurgent India|publisher=Ram Company|year=2004 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book |first1=Walter K. |last1=Andersen |author-link=Walter K. Andersen |first2=Shridhar D. |last2=Damle |title=The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism |url=https://archive.org/details/brotherhoodinsaf0000ande |url-access=registration |orig-date=Originally published by Westview Press |publisher=Vistaar Publications |location=Delhi |year=1987 |ref=none }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Bhambhri |first1=C.P. |title=Bharatiya Janata Party : Periphery to Centre |date=2001 |publisher=Shipra |location=Delhi |isbn=978-81-7541-078-7 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book |first=Craig |last=Baxter |author-link=Craig Baxter |title=The Jana Sangh — A Biography of an Indian Political Party |publisher=Oxford University Press, Bombay |year=1971 |orig-date=first published by ] 1969 |isbn=978-0-8122-7583-4 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/janasanghbiograp0000baxt |ref=none }} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Chadha|first1=Kalyani|first2=Pallavi|last2=Guha|title=The Bharatiya Janata Party's online campaign and citizen involvement in India's 2014 election|url=https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947|journal=]|volume=10|date=2016|access-date=16 May 2021|archive-date=16 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516184915/https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last=Ganguly|first=Sumit|title=Hindu nationalism and the foreign policy of India's Bharatiya Janata Party|journal=Transatlantic Academy Paper Series|volume=2|date=2015|pages=1–15|url=https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf|isbn=978-1-5292-0460-5|access-date=11 January 2021|archive-date=4 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304071320/https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf|url-status=dead}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Graham |first=B. D. |title=Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and Development of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-38348-6 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite journal|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826 |title=Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics |year=2015 |last1=Harriss |first1=John |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=712–718 |s2cid=147615034 |doi-access=free }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Malik |first1=Yogendra K. |last2=Singh |first2=V.B. |title=Hindu Nationalists in India : The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |date=1994 |publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, Colorado |isbn=978-0-8133-8810-6}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Jaffrelot |first=Christophe |author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot|title=The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher=C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year=1996 |isbn=978-1-85065-301-1 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last=Jaffrelot|first=Christophe|author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot|title=Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?|journal=Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics|date=July 2003|page=16|url=http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf|access-date=5 November 2013|ref=none|archive-date=4 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204131058/http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Jain|first1=Varsha|first2=Ganesh|last2=B.E.|title=Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders: A Case of India and Narendra Modi.|journal=Journal of Political Marketing|volume=19|issue=1–2|date=2020|pages=15–33|doi=10.1080/15377857.2019.1652222|s2cid=202247610}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Mishra |first1=Madhusudan |title=Bharatiya Janata Party and India's Foreign Policy |date=1997 |publisher=Uppal Pub. House |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-85565-79-8 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Nag |first=Kingshuk |author-link=Kingshuk Nag |title=The Saffron Tide: The Rise of the BJP |publisher=Rupa Publications |year=2014 |isbn=978-8129134295 |ref=none}} | |||
* Nag, Kingshuk. ''Atal Bihari Vajpayee'' (Rupa Publications, 2016). | |||
* Palshikar, Suhas, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Lodha, eds. ''Electoral Politics in India: The Resurgence of the Bharatiya Janata Party'' (Taylor & Francis, 2017). | |||
* Raghavan, G.N.S. ''New Era in the Indian Polity, A Study of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the BJP'' (1996). | |||
* {{cite journal |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856327 |jstor=41856327 |title=Foreign Policy Position of Bharatiya Janata Party Towards Issues of India Pakistan Relations |last1=Sanjeev Kr |first1=H. M. |journal=The Indian Journal of Political Science |year=2007 |volume=68 |issue=2 |pages=275–291 |access-date=11 January 2021 |archive-date=13 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210113184500/https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856327 |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Sharma |first1=C.P. Thakur, Devendra P. |title=India under Atal Behari Vajpayee : The BJP Era |date=1999 |publisher=UBS Publishers' Distributors |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-7476-250-4 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book|last1=Stein|first1=Burton|title=A history of India|year=2010|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|location=Chichester, UK|isbn=978-1-4051-9509-6|edition= edited by David Arnold. 2nd |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book|last1=Rao|first1=Ramesh|title=Coalition conundrum: the BJP's trials, tribulations, and triumphs|year=2001|publisher=Har Anand|isbn=9788124108093 |ref=none}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
<!-- ATTENTION! Please do not add links without discussion and consensus on the talk page. Undiscussed links will be removed. --> | <!-- ATTENTION! Please do not add links without discussion and consensus on the talk page. Undiscussed links will be removed. --> | ||
{{Wikinews category|Bharatiya Janata Party}}{{Commons and category}} | |||
* {{Official website|https://www.bjp.org/}} | |||
<!-- ATTENTION! Please do not add links without discussion and consensus on the talk page. Undiscussed links will be removed. --> | |||
* {{GovPubs|bjp%20india|BJP}} | |||
* {{Internet Archive author|sname=Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
* {{Britannica|64033}} | |||
{{Bharatiya Janata Party}} | {{Bharatiya Janata Party}} | ||
{{Navboxes | |||
|title=] | |||
|list1= | |||
{{Sangh Parivar}} | |||
{{National Democratic Alliance}} | |||
{{Indian political parties}} | {{Indian political parties}} | ||
{{Hindu Nationalism}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Portal bar|Conservatism|India|Politics|Philosophy}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 06:49, 24 December 2024
Indian political party "BJP" redirects here. For other uses, see BJP (disambiguation).Indian political party ‹ The template Infobox political party is being considered for merging. ›
Part of a series on |
Bharatiya Janata Party |
---|
About |
Committees |
Frontals |
|
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, [bʱaːɾətiːjə dʒənətaː paːɾʈiː] ; lit. 'Indian People's Party') is a political party in India and one of the two major Indian political parties alongside the Indian National Congress. BJP was born out from Syama Prasad Mukherjee's Bharatiya Jana Sangh. Since 2014, it has been the ruling political party in India under the incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The BJP is aligned with right-wing politics and has close ideological and organisational links to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a far-right paramilitary organisation. Its policies adhere to Hindutva, a Hindu nationalist ideology. As of January 2024, it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the Parliament of India as well as state legislatures.
The party's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician Syama Prasad Mukherjee, after he left Hindu Mahasabha to form a party as the political wing of RSS. After the Emergency of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the Janata Party; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the 1977 general election. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the 1984 general election, it grew in strength on the back of the movement around Ram Janmabhoomi in Uttar Pradesh. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee, lasted for only 13 days.
After the 1998 general election, the BJP-led coalition known as the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the 2004 general election, the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the chief minister of Gujarat, led the party to a landslide victory in the 2014 general election. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected with a sole majority in the 2019 general election and with a coalition in the 2024 general election. As of December 2023, the alliance governs 17 Indian states and union territories.
The official ideology of the BJP is integral humanism, first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965. The party advocates social conservatism and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindu nationalist priorities, and focused on a largely liberal economic policy that prioritised globalisation and economic growth over social welfare. Since returning to government in 2014, the BJP government has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of triple talaq, and revoking Article 370 of the Constitution of India (which granted autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir), abrogating its statehood.
The party has frequently spread disinformation and has been condemned by foreign entities for spreading conspiracy theories. India has experienced nationwide democratic backsliding under the BJP's rule since 2014.
Name, symbol, and themes
The name as well as the symbol of the party were selected by the founders. The name "Bharatiya Janata Party" literally translates to "Indian People's Party". The Symbol of the party is the flower Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). Lotus has a cultural significance within India as well as Hinduism. The symbol has been regarded as a symbol of peace and prosperity within Hinduism. Likewise, during the independence movement of India, the symbol was used by Indian nationalist as a symbol of revolt against the British Raj. Lotus is also recognised as the national flower of India. Thus, use of the symbol gives the party a nationalist as well as Hindutva appeal. Besides these, the party also heavily uses the Saffron colour in its promotional materials and campaigning. Similar to Lotus, the Saffron colour also has a major significance within Hinduism. The most common flag used by the party is predominantly saffron with a stripe of green in the left. Within the Saffron part of the flag, the lotus symbol is also integrated. This particular colour scheme used in the flag assists the party to project itself as a secular party. Meanwhile, this also helps the party to maintain a religious undertone for its core electorate and Hindu nationalistic supporter groups.
Precursors
Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77)
Influential figuresSyama Prasad Mookerjee, founder-president of the Bharatiya Jana SanghLal Krishna Advani, the last president of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh Main article: Bharatiya Jana SanghThe BJP's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by Syama Prasad Mukherjee in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant National Congress party. It was founded in collaboration with the Hindu nationalist volunteer organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), and was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS. The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of Pakistan by the Congress party and then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. The RSS loaned several of its leading pracharaks, or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was Deendayal Upadhyaya, who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three Lok Sabha seats in the first general elections in 1952. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.
The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India. Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail. Mauli Chandra Sharma was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of integral humanism, which formed the official doctrine of the party. Younger leaders, such as Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Lal Krishna Advani also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a uniform civil code, banning cow slaughter and abolishing the special status given to Jammu and Kashmir.
After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the Swatantra Party and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the Hindi Belt, including Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.
Janata Party (1977–80)
Main article: Janata PartyIn 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed a state of emergency. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the Socialist Party, the Congress (O) and the Bharatiya Lok Dal to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi. The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with Morarji Desai as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. Vajpayee, previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the Minister of External Affairs.
The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation. The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party. Violence between Hindus and Muslims increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in Aligarh and Jamshedpur in 1978–79. The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the former Jana Sangh members should dissociate themselves from the RSS, which they refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the Janata Party (Secular). The Morarji Desai government was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing Desai's resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.
History
Formation and early days
Influential figuresAtal Bihari Vajpayee, the founder-president of the Bharatiya Janata PartyAlthough the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president. Historian Ramachandra Guha writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the Hindu nationalist stance of its predecessor the Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of Gandhian socialism. This was unsuccessful, as it won only two Lok Sabha seats in the elections of 1984. The assassination of Indira Gandhi a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the Congress which won a record tally of 414 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.
Ram Janmabhoomi movement
Main article: Ram Rath Yatra Further information: Ayodhya dispute and Demolition of the Babri MasjidThe failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindu nationalism. In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. In the early 1980s, the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a temple dedicated to the Hindu deity Rama at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor Babur in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there. The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque. The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 Lok Sabha seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the National Front government of V. P. Singh.
In September 1990, Advani began a Rath Yatra (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the yatra was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim". Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then Bihar chief minister Lalu Prasad Yadav. A large number of kar sevaks (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several kar sevaks. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh. The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the Uttar Pradesh assembly.
On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque. The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the demolition of the mosque. Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people. The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition. Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act. In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament. Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.
A 2009 report, authored by Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP. Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and Murli Manohar Joshi. The report also criticised Kalyan Singh, Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition. He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition. In 2020, the Supreme Court of India acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.
Following the 2019 Supreme Court verdict, the Government of India announced a trust to construct the Mandir. On 22 January 2024, the Ram Mandir was officially opened. Prime Minister Narendra Modi led its consecration, claiming it to be the start of a new era. The temple is expected to be fully completed by December 2024.
Vajpayee and Advani era (1996–2004)
Further information: National Democratic AllianceA coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the Samata Party, the Shiromani Akali Dal, the Shiv Sena in addition to the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the Biju Janata Dal. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; Amartya Sen, for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping. The NDA had a majority with outside support from the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister. However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, J. Jayalalithaa, withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.
On 13 October 1999, without the AIADMK, the NDA won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest-ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror and neo-liberal economic policies. In 2001, Bangaru Laxman, then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in a sting operation. He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.
2002 Gujarat violence
Main article: 2002 Gujarat violenceOn 27 February 2002, a train carrying Hindu pilgrims was burned outside the town of Godhra, killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of Gujarat that lasted several weeks. The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced. Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread. The then-Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties. In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT. BJP MLA Maya Kodnani, who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment; she was later acquitted by the Gujarat High Court. Scholars such as Paul Brass, Martha Nussbaum and Dipankar Gupta have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.
In opposition (2004–2014)
Vajpayee called for early elections in 2004, six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "India Shining", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country. However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the Lok Sabha, compared to the 222 of the Congress and its allies. Manmohan Singh succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the United Progressive Alliance. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.
In May 2008, the BJP won the state elections in Karnataka. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any South Indian state. In the 2009 general elections, its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. The election campaign would be the final for Advani as leader. The party would be led by Arun Jaitley in the Rajya Sabha and Sushma Swaraj in the Lok Sabha for the following 5 years. It lost the Karnataka assembly election in 2013.
Modi era (2014–present)
Main article: Premiership of Narendra Modi Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India since 2014Amit Shah has been the longest (continuous) serving National President of the BJPIn the 2014 Indian general election, the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha. Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th prime minister of India on 26 May 2014. The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won. This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its own strength. Support was concentrated in the Hindi-speaking belt in North-central India. The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.
Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term. The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and Dalit people, as well as among Other Backward Classes. Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP. The BJP was also very successful at mobilizing its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.
After winning the election, the organisation of the BJP became more centralised with Modi at the helm. People loyal to Modi were rewarded leadership positions across various states within India. Amit Shah, a close confidant of Modi, was appointed as the president of the BJP in 2014. Contextually, many veteran leaders of the party like Lal Krishna Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, and Jaswant Singh amongst others were allegedly sidelined.
In 2016, the BJP joined the International Democratic Union, a grouping of various centre-right and right-wing political parties across the globe. However, as of 2024, the party is no longer a member, the secretary general of the IDU, Tina Mercep, stated that they would welcome full membership of the BJP in their global network. However, BJP's youth organisation remains a member of the youth wing of the IDU.
During Modi's first term as prime minister, the BJP expanded its presence in several states where it had previously been a minor player, and it regained power in other states where it had been in opposition for a considerable period. Assam, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, and Jammu and Kashmir saw an increase in the BJP's influence, and the party entered government in several of these states.
In 2019, the BJP won the general election with an increased majority. Soon after returning to power, on 5 August 2019, the Modi administration revoked the special status, or limited autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state. This state consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of a dispute among India, Pakistan, and China since 1947.
Later in 2019, the Modi administration introduced the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, which was passed by the Parliament of India on 11 December 2019. It amended the Citizenship Act, 1955 by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian religion, who had fled persecution from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan before December 2014. Muslims from those countries were not given such eligibility. The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law. A report by the V-Dem Institute described India as experiencing democratic backsliding due to the Modi era. Various other studies and media sources also cite India experiencing democratic backsliding. This is considered the most notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian Emergency years of 1975–77.
Ideology and political positions
The party along the history has been widely described as a right-wing party, but has recently been described as far-right or part of the radical right, a subset of the far-right that does not oppose democracy.
Social policies and Hindutva
HindutvaThe official philosophy of the BJP is "Integral humanism," a philosophy first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage." It is committed to Hindutva, an ideology articulated by Indian independence activist Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over westernisation, thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion. Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a Hindu nationalist party in a general sense. The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.
The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the Ram Mandir temple at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque. This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections. However, the demolition of the mosque during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in a backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda. The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools. Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "saffronise" Indian history. The NDA government introduced Hindu astrology as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.
Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions. In 2014, Yellapragada Sudershan Rao, who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR). Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism. Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars Nandini Sundar and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions. The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasizing the role of Jawaharlal Nehru, and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.
The BJP supports a uniform civil code, which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority. The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted, the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its accession to the Indian Union. It simultaneously abrogated Jammu and Kashmir statehood, reorganizing it into two union territories, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
The BJP opposes illegal immigration into India from Bangladesh. The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy and stability of the country. Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants. Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful. The party later became the party of government in Assam. The Modi administration passed a citizenship law in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who are Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians. The law does not grant such eligibility to Muslims. This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law: it attracted global criticism, and sparked widespread protests that were halted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the 2020 Delhi riots, caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims. Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.
In 2013, the Supreme Court of India reinstated the controversial Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics, including Muslim religious leaders, stated that they supported the verdict. BJP president Rajnath Singh said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural, though the party softened the stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections. The Modi government is opposed to same-sex marriage, stating in a legal affidavit that legalizing it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as 'husband', a biological woman as 'wife' and children born out of union".
Economic policies
The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the Jana Sangh, it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported swadeshi (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a protectionist export policy. However, it supported internal economic liberalisation, and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress. During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards globalisation. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India. This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch: the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its swadeshi ideology.
The two NDA governments in the period 1998–2004 introduced significant deregulation and privatisation of government-owned enterprises. It also introduced tariff-reducing measures. These reforms built off of the initial economic liberalisation introduced by the P. V. Narasimha Rao-led Congress government in the early 1990s. India's GDP growth increased substantially during the tenure of the NDA. The 2004 campaign slogan India Shining was based on the party's belief that the free market would bring prosperity to all sectors of society. After its unexpected defeat, commentators said that it was punished for neglecting the needs of the poor and focusing too much on its corporate allies.
This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years. Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development. Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.
The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a neoliberal framework. Modi liberalised India's foreign direct investment policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways. Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them; some of these proposals were dropped after protests. The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP. The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers. Modi has been described as taking a more economically populist approach on healthcare and agricultural policy. Modi's government has also been described as taking a more protectionist turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership talks and introducing the 2020 Atmanirbhar Bharat economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.
Defence and counterterrorism
Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism. The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the Prevention of Terrorism Act, which later came under heavy criticism. It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States War on Terror.
Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised Pokhran-II, a series of five nuclear tests in 1998. The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.
The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying Kashmir territory, later known as the Kargil War. Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.
After the terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001, the NDA government passed the Prevention of Terrorism Act. The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism. It initially failed to pass in the Rajya Sabha; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a joint session of the Parliament, where the numerical superior Lok Sabha allowed the bill to pass. The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism. However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon civil liberties, and the National Human Rights Commission of India stated that it had been used to target Muslims. It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.
The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a 2015 Indian counter-insurgency operation in Myanmar against the National Socialist Council of Nagaland, the 2016 Indian Line of Control strike in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the 2019 Balakot airstrike in Pakistan. It also militarily intervened in defence of Bhutan during the 2017 Doklam standoff with China.
The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms. In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War. The Department of Military Affairs was also established and put under the CDS.
Foreign policy
The historical stance of the BJP towards foreign policy, like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on an aggressive Hindu nationalism combined with economic protectionism. The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the partition of India; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate. This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology. During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of non-alignment, and instead advocated closeness to the United States. In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States, while stressing a desire for a more multipolar world order. Despite this, it has accused the U.S. State Department and "deep state" elements in the United States of attempting to destabilise India.
The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it. Its policy also represented a significant change from the Nehruvian idealism of previous governments, opting instead for realism. His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the Delhi–Lahore Bus service. Vajpayee signed the Lahore Declaration, which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests. However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the 1999 Kargil War. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the Line of Control that marked the de facto border between the two countries. Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak". This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil Agra summit, preventing any significant deal from being reached.
The Vajpayee government strongly opposed the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, with Vajpayee describing it as a "dance of destruction". The Vajpayee administration later offered political support to the U.S. War on Terror, in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons. However, the BJP strongly condemned the 2003 invasion of Iraq, stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq". The BJP also opposed the 2011 military intervention in Libya and urged the Lok Sabha to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.
The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with Nawaz Sharif's government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015. Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017. The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy. In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared blockade on Nepal. The Modi government expressed concern following the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a United Nations Security Council resolution regarding the situation there. The Modi government remained neutral on the Russo-Ukrainian War, abstaining from United Nations Security Council Resolution 2623, which condemned the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.
Disinformation and conspiracy theories
The BJP has frequently spread disinformation and relied on Muslim demonisation. The use of fake news has been a part of the party's strategy. In September 2018, Amit Shah said at a party meeting in Rajasthan that the BJP IT cell had influenced the media during the 2017 Uttar Pradesh elections and added that, "We should be capable of delivering any message to the public, whether sweet or sour, true or fake."
On April 2024, the US department criticised the BJP for promoting anti-semitic conspiracy theories involving George Soros.
In December 2024, the French newspaper Mediapart condemned the BJP for falsifying its reports and added that, "There are no facts available supporting the conspiracy theory promoted by BJP".
Organisation and structure
Main article: Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party Further information: List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party and National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata PartyThe organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the president being the highest authority in the party. Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term. This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.
Below the president is the National Executive, which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president. An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.
The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other Sangh Parivar-related organisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the Sangh Parivar:
- The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (All India Students' Union), the students' wing of the RSS
- The Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (Indian Farmer's Union), the farmers' division
- The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (Indian Labourers Union), the labour union associated with the RSS
The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as:
- The BJP Mahila Morcha (BJP Women's Front), its women's division
- The Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (Indian People's Youth Front), its youth wing
- The BJP Minority Morcha (BJP Minority Front), its minority division
In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's largest political parties. In September 2024, PM Modi initiated the BJP membership drive, this campaign has been controversial for deceptive and coercive membership enrollment by BJP workers. In Gujarat, minor school children have been enrolled as BJP members
General election results
See also: Electoral history of the Bharatiya Janata PartyThe Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two Lok Sabha seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived. In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions. In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the Opposition whenever the party was not in power.
Year | Legislature | Party leader | Seats contested | Seats won | Change in seats | Percentage of votes |
Vote swing | Outcome | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1984 | 8th Lok Sabha | Atal Bihari Vajpayee | 229 | 2 / 543 | 2 | 7.74% | New | Opposition | |
1989 | 9th Lok Sabha | Lal Krishna Advani | 225 | 85 / 543 | 83 | 11.36% | 3.62% | Outside support for NF | |
1991 | 10th Lok Sabha | 477 | 120 / 543 | 35 | 20.11% | 8.75% | Opposition | ||
1996 | 11th Lok Sabha | Atal Bihari Vajpayee | 471 | 161 / 543 | 41 | 20.29% | 0.18% | Coalition, later opposition | |
1998 | 12th Lok Sabha | 388 | 182 / 543 | 21 | 25.59% | 5.30% | Coalition | ||
1999 | 13th Lok Sabha | 339 | 182 / 543 | 23.75% | 1.84% | Coalition | |||
2004 | 14th Lok Sabha | 364 | 138 / 543 | 44 | 22.16% | 1.69% | Opposition | ||
2009 | 15th Lok Sabha | Lal Krishna Advani | 433 | 116 / 543 | 22 | 18.80% | 3.36% | Opposition | |
2014 | 16th Lok Sabha | Narendra Modi | 428 | 282 / 543 | 166 | 31.34% | 12.54% | Majority | |
2019 | 17th Lok Sabha | 436 | 303 / 543 | 21 | 37.46% | 6.12% | Majority | ||
2024 | 18th Lok Sabha | 441 | 240 / 543 | 63 | 36.56% | 0.8% | Coalition |
Presence in states and Union Territories
The BJP has previously held power in Karnataka, Delhi and Jharkhand, and has been the junior coalition partner in governments in Jammu and Kashmir (with the Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party), Punjab (with the Shiromani Akali Dal), and Tamil Nadu (with the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam). It has never held power in Kerala, Telangana, and West Bengal.
In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the North-East Democratic Alliance.
Lower House | |||
---|---|---|---|
Legislature | Seats | Legislative leader | Status |
Andhra Pradesh | 8 / 175 | Penmetsa Vishnu Kumar Raju | Coalition |
Arunachal Pradesh | 46 / 60 | Pema Khandu | Government |
Assam | 64 / 126 | Himanta Biswa Sarma | Government |
Bihar | 82 / 243 | Samrat Choudhary | Coalition |
Chhattisgarh | 54 / 90 | Vishnu Deo Sai | Government |
Delhi | 7 / 70 | Vijendra Gupta | Opposition |
Goa | 28 / 40 | Pramod Sawant | Government |
Gujarat | 162 / 182 | Bhupendrabhai Patel | Government |
Haryana | 48 / 90 | Nayab Singh Saini | Government |
27 / 68 | Jai Ram Thakur | Opposition | |
28 / 90 | Sunil Kumar Sharma | Opposition | |
21 / 81 | TBA | Opposition | |
66 / 224 | R. Ashoka | Opposition | |
0 / 140 | No Representation | ||
165 / 230 | Mohan Yadav | Government | |
132 / 288 | Devendra Fadnavis | Government | |
37 / 60 | N. Biren Singh | Government | |
2 / 60 | Sanbor Shullai | Coalition | |
2 / 40 | K. Beichhua | Others | |
12 / 60 | Y. Patton | Coalition | |
78 / 147 | Mohan Charan Majhi | Government | |
9 / 33 | A. Namassivayam | Coalition | |
2 / 117 | Ashwani Kumar Sharma | Others | |
119 / 200 | Bhajan Lal Sharma | Government | |
0 / 32 | No Representation | Alliance | |
4 / 234 | Nainar Nagendran | Others | |
8 / 119 | Alleti Maheshwar Reddy | Others | |
33 / 60 | Manik Saha | Government | |
257 / 403 | Yogi Adityanath | Government | |
47 / 70 | Pushkar Singh Dhami | Government | |
66 / 294 | Suvendu Adhikari | Opposition | |
Upper House | |||
Rajya Sabha | 95 / 245 | J. P. Nadda | Government |
Andhra Pradesh | 0 / 58 | No Representation | Coalition |
Bihar | 24 / 75 | Hari Sahni | Government |
30 / 75 | Chalavadi Narayanaswamy | Opposition | |
19 / 78 | Pravin Darekar | Government | |
1 / 40 | A.Venkata Narayana Reddy | Others | |
82 / 100 | Keshav Prasad Maurya | Government |
List of heads of government
List of prime ministers
Further information: List of prime ministers of IndiaNo. | Portrait | Prime minister | Constituency | Term in office | Lok Sabha | Cabinet | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Start | End | Tenure | ||||||
1 | Atal Bihari Vajpayee | Lucknow | 16 May 1996 | 1 June 1996 | 16 days | 11th | Vajpayee I | |
19 March 1998 | 22 May 2004 | 6 years, 64 days | 12th | Vajpayee II | ||||
13th | Vajpayee III | |||||||
2 | Narendra Modi | Varanasi | 26 May 2014 | Incumbent | 10 years, 214 days | 16th | Modi I | |
17th | Modi II | |||||||
18th | Modi III |
List of incumbent chief ministers
Main article: List of chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata PartyAs of 4 December 2024, 54 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 14 of whom are incumbent.
No. | State | Portrait | Name | Cabinet | Governing coalition | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Arunachal Pradesh | Pema Khandu | Khandu V | BJP | ||
NPP | ||||||
2 | Assam | Himanta Biswa Sarma | Sarma I | BJP | ||
AGP | ||||||
UPPL | ||||||
3 | Chhattisgarh | Vishnudeo Sai | Sai I | BJP | ||
4 | Goa | Pramod Sawant | Sawant II | BJP | ||
MGP | ||||||
IND | ||||||
5 | Gujarat | Bhupendrabhai Patel | Patel II | BJP | ||
6 | Haryana | Nayab Singh Saini | Saini II | BJP | ||
7 | Madhya Pradesh | Mohan Yadav | Yadav I | BJP | ||
8 | Maharashtra | Devendra Fadnavis | Fadnavis III | BJP | ||
SHS | ||||||
NCP | ||||||
JSS | ||||||
RSP | ||||||
RYSP | ||||||
RSVA | ||||||
IND | ||||||
9 | Manipur | N. Biren Singh | Singh II | BJP | ||
NPP | ||||||
NPF | ||||||
IND | ||||||
10 | Odisha | Mohan Charan Majhi | Majhi I | BJP | ||
11 | Rajasthan | Bhajan Lal Sharma | Sharma I | BJP | ||
12 | Tripura | Manik Saha | Saha II | BJP | ||
IPFT | ||||||
13 | Uttar Pradesh | Yogi Adityanath | Adityanath II | BJP | ||
AD(S) | ||||||
RLD | ||||||
NP | ||||||
14 | Uttarakhand | Pushkar Singh Dhami | Dhami II | BJP |
See also
- Leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Parliament of India
- List of political parties in India
- List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party
- List of state presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party
- Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party
- Politics of India
- List of ruling political parties by country
References
Explanatory notes
- in 2002
- Sharma (2019), p. 523: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."
- Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: "Nehru's response made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."
- Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
- Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
- For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
Citations
- Ananya Das (20 January 2020). "Jagat Prakash Nadda: BJP's new national president rises through the ranks, faces several challenges". Zee News. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- Gyan Varma (15 July 2019). "Meet BL Santhosh, newly appointed general secretary of BJP". live mint. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- "Bharatiya Janata Party Constitution". BJP official website. Bharatiya Janata Party. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2017. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
- "BJP announces new parliamentary committee; Modi leader in Lok Sabha, Rajnath his deputy". India Today. 12 June 2019. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- "Rajesh Agarwal gets BJP treasurer post". United News of India. 27 September 2020. Archived from the original on 17 October 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
- ^ "BJP's foundation day: Brief history of the achievements and failures of the party". The Indian Express. 6 April 2019. Archived from the original on 11 May 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- "What you need to know about India's BJP". AlJazeera. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 13 May 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- "BJP Gets A New Address; Soul Of New Office Is The Party Worker, Says PM Modi". NDTV.com. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- Election Commission 2013.
- Devesh Kumar (20 May 2014). "BJP + 29 Parties=National Democratic Alliance". NDTV. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- "BJP seals alliances in Northeast, aims 22 LS seats". The Hindu Business Line. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- "Party Position pdf" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- "BJP's Rajya Sabha Tally Dips, NDA Now 4 Below Majority Mark".
- "Alphabetical Party Position in the Rajya Sabha". Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
- "Strengthwise Party Position in the Rajya Sabha". Rajya Sabha. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017.
- "BJP gains back Madhya Pradesh in just 15 months after losing it". India Today. 26 November 2019. Archived from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
- * Johnson, Matthew; Garnett, Mark; Walker, David M (2017). Conservatism and Ideology. Routledge. pp. 45–50. ISBN 978-1-317-52900-2. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- Björn Goldstein (2015) The unconscious Indianization of 'Western' conservatism – is Indian conservatism a universal model?, Global Discourse, 5:1, 44–65, doi:10.1080/23269995.2014.946315
- Mazumdar, Surajit (2017). "Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India". Desenvolvimento Em Debate. 5 (1): 115–131. doi:10.51861/ded.dmds.1.011. ISSN 2176-9257. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022 – via Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
- Chhibber, Pradeep. K.; Verma, Rahul (2018). Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India. Oxford University Press. pp. 50–150. ISBN 978-0-19-062390-6. LCCN 2018001733. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
- * Mazumdar, Surajit (2017). "Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India". Desenvolvimento Em Debate. 5 (1): 115–131. doi:10.51861/ded.dmds.1.011. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022 – via Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
- Gopalakrishnan, Shankar (7 July 2006). "Defining, Constructing and Policing a 'New India': Relationship between Neoliberalism and Hindutva". Economic & Political Weekly. 41 (26): 2803–2813. JSTOR 4418408. Archived from the original on 17 October 2020. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
- Wilson, Kalpana; Ung Loh, Jennifer; Purewal, Navtej (July 2018). "Gender, Violence and the Neoliberal State in India" (PDF). Feminist Review. 119 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1057/s41305-018-0109-8. S2CID 149814002. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- Mathur, Navdeep (2018). "The low politics of higher education: saffron branded neoliberalism and the assault on Indian universities". Critical Policy Studies. 12 (1): 121–125. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1403343. S2CID 148842457.
- Johnson, Matthew; Garnett, Mark; Walker, David M (2017). Conservatism and Ideology. Routledge. pp. 45–50. ISBN 978-1-317-52900-2. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- * Chatterji, Angana P.; Hansen, Thomas Blom; Jaffrelot, Christophe (2019). Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India. Oxford University Press. pp. 100–130. ISBN 978-0-19-007817-1. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe, and Cynthia Schoch. "Conclusion to Part I." In Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, 148–54. Princeton University Press, 2021. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1dc9jzx.12.
- Chhibber, Pradeep. K.; Verma, Rahul (2018). Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-062390-6. LCCN 2018001733. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
- * Henrik Berglund. "Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP." Economic and Political Weekly 39, no. 10 (2004): 1064–70. JSTOR 4414737.
- Chhibber, Pradeep K. "State Policy, Party Politics, and the Rise of the BJP." In Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India, 159–76. University of Michigan Press, 1999. JSTOR 10.3998/mpub.23136.12.
- * McDonnell, Duncan; Cabrera, Luis (2019). "The right-wing populism of India's Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care)". Democratization. 26 (3): 484–501. doi:10.1080/13510347.2018.1551885. S2CID 149464986.
- Özçelik, Ezgi (2019). Right-wing Populist Governments Rhetorical Framing of Economic Inequality : the Cases of BJP in India and AKP in Turkey. Koç University.
- "International Democrat Union » Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU)". International Democracy Union. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 12 June 2017.
- Iwanek, Krzysztof (10 September 2018). "Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
- ^ Malik & Singh 1992, pp. 318–336; Banerjee 2005, p. 3118; BBC 2012.
- ^ Davies, Peter; Lynch, Derek (16 August 2005). The Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right. Routledge. p. 103. ISBN 978-1-134-60952-9.
- Siddhartha Rai (27 January 2017). "PM Modi goes cashless, buys lifetime subscription of BJP mouthpiece Kamal Sandesh through cheque". India Today. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- Sengupta, Tamal. "Bengal BJP revamps party mouthpiece before 2018 panchayet elections". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
- "Public Policy Research Centre". Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 22 July 2020.
- —"BJP think tank offers online course in governance; babus to impart lessons". New Delhi: The New Indian Express. 23 May 2020. Archived from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- "BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card". dailypioneer.com. New Delhi: The Pioneer. 10 September 2019. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
Public Policy Research Center (PPRC), BJP's think tank, on Monday released a comprehensive report on 100 major decisions and initiatives taken by Modi Government in first 100 days.
- "BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card". dailypioneer.com. New Delhi: The Pioneer. 10 September 2019. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- "BJP youth wing launches its campaign for party's Lok Sabha poll win". Economic Times. 19 January 2019. Archived from the original on 12 October 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- "Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad is not the students' wing of BJP: Shreehari Borikar". Archived from the original on 28 February 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- "Quota for women in council of ministers among Mahila Morcha's suggestions for BJP poll manifesto". Economic Times. 5 April 2019. Archived from the original on 7 June 2022. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- Pragya Singh (15 January 2008). "Need to Know BJP-led BMS is biggest labour union in India". live mint. Archived from the original on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- Rajkumar. "सरकार की नीतियों को किसानों तक पहुंचाएगा बीजेपी किसान मोर्चा". m.patrika.com. Archived from the original on 19 October 2020. Retrieved 8 August 2020.
- "In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress". The Times of India. 19 May 2016. Archived from the original on 5 November 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- "Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the barrister who founded Bharatiya Janta Party". India Today. 6 July 2019. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
- "Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303". Zee News. 25 May 2019. Archived from the original on 2 June 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- "Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch". Business Standard. 17 March 2019. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
- Sharma, Mukul (2023). "Hindu Nationalism and Right-wing Ecology: RSS, Modi and Motherland Post-2014". Studies in Indian Politics. 11: 102–117. doi:10.1177/23210230231166197.
- Banerjee 2005, p. 3118.
- Malik & Singh 1992, p. 318.
- Swain 2001, p. 60.
- Subba, Chhawang (4 April 2022). "Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and the Role of Bharatiya Jana Sangh in Indian Politics" (PDF). IJCRT. p. a570. ISSN 2320-2882. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 February 2024. Retrieved 21 February 2024.
- ^ Guha 2007, p. 633.
- ^ Sen 2005, pp. 251–272.
- ^ Bhatty, Kiran; Sundar, Nandini (17 September 2020). "Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime". International Sociology. 35 (6). SAGE Publications: 632–650. doi:10.1177/0268580920937226. ISSN 0268-5809. S2CID 224896271.
- ^ Jaffrelot, Christophe; Schoch, C. (2023). Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy. Princeton University Press. p. 329. ISBN 978-0-691-24790-8. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
- ^ The Hindu Bureau (9 December 2024). "BJP spreading 'fake news', says French media house Mediapart". The Hindu. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
- ^ Hindle, Garry; Lindberg, Staffan (2020). "New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party" (PDF). V-Dem Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
- ^ Alizada, Nazifa; Cole, Rowan; Gastaldi, Lisa; Grahn, Sandra; Hellmeier, Sebastian; Kolvani, Palina; Lachapelle, Jean; Lührmann, Anna; Maerz, Seraphine F.; Pillai, Shreeya; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2021), "Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021" (PDF), University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute, pp. 20–21, archived from the original (PDF) on 14 September 2021
- ^ Sirnate, Vasundhara (27 November 2021). "The democratic backsliding of India". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 30 August 2022.
- ^ Das, Sabyasachi (3 July 2023). "Democratic Backsliding in the World's Largest Democracy" (Document). Ashoka University.
- Banerjee-Fischer, Joanna (27 January 2024). "What do India's political logos symbolize?". dw.com. Archived from the original on 24 March 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
- Suraiya, Jug. "NaMo and the lotus". The Times of India. ISSN 0971-8257. Archived from the original on 24 March 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
- "BJP's 43 years: How it emerged from Jana Sangh and became world's largest party". India Today. 6 April 2023. Archived from the original on 2 January 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
- ^ "Ram Temple inauguration: Advent of a new era, says PM Modi". Hindustan Times. 22 January 2024. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
- ^ Iwanek, Krzysztof. "Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties". thediplomat.com. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
- Noorani 1978, p. 216.
- Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 116–119.
- ^ Guha 2007, p. 136.
- ^ Guha 2007, p. 250.
- Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 122–126, 129–130.
- Guha 2007, pp. 250, 352, 413.
- Guha 2007, pp. 427–428.
- ^ Guha 2007, pp. 538–540.
- Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 282–283.
- Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 292–301, 312.
- Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 301–312.
- "Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born". The Indian Express. 7 April 2020 . Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
- ^ Malik & Singh 1992, pp. 318–336.
- Guha 2007, p. 579.
- Pai 1996, pp. 1170–1183.
- Jha 2003.
- Flint 2005, p. 165.
- Guha 2007, pp. 582–598.
- Guha 2007, p. 635.
- Guha 2007, p. 636.
- ^ Guha 2007, pp. 633–659.
- NDTV 2012.
- ^ Al Jazeera 2009.
- "All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case | Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it". The Hindu. 30 September 2020. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
- "First, second floors of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya to be completed by Dec 2024: Temple official". Hindustan Times. 4 January 2024. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
- Sen 2005, p. 254.
- rediff.com 1998.
- Outlook 2013.
- Kattakayam 2012.
- India Today 2001.
- Tehelka 2001.
- Ghassem-Fachandi 2012, pp. 1–31.
- ^ Jaffrelot 2013, p. 16.
- Harris 2012.
- Krishnan 2012.
- Hindustan Times 2014.
- NDTV.com 2012.
- "Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence". India Today. 20 April 2018. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
- Brass 2005, pp. 385–393.
- Gupta 2011, p. 252.
- Nussbaum 2008, p. 2.
- ^ Ramesh 2004.
- ^ The Hindu 2004.
- Hindustan Times 2009.
- Mathew 2014.
- Deccan Chronicle 2014.
- BBC & May 2014.
- ^ Sridharan 2014.
- Times of India 2014.
- Diwakar 2014.
- ^ Varshney 2014.
- Sen, Suhit K. "BJP, which mocks Congress, has fallen prey to extreme centralisation". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- "All the PM's people: How Modi is shaping BJP organisationally, redefining 'party democracy'". The Indian Express. 18 December 2023. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- "Amit Shah's elevation as BJP President signals a generational change and Modi's complete takeover of the party". India Today. 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- Chaturvedi, Rakesh Mohan (22 March 2014). "Narendra Modi sidelines old guard in BJP; Jaswant Singh gearing up to contest from Barmer as Independent". The Economic Times. ISSN 0013-0389. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- Pillalamarri, Akhilesh. "India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties". thediplomat.com. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- "Stephen Harper's Global Alliance of Conservative Parties Quietly Scrubbed India Off Its Website". PressProgress. 5 February 2024. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- "BJP Conspicuous by Absence from Global Centre-Right Political Parties' Alliance". The Wire. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- Karmakar, Rahul (31 December 2018). "2018 was a landmark year for BJP, women in Northeast". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- Akhtar, Rais; Kirk, William. "Jammu and Kashmir, State, India". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 20 August 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2019.
Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947.
- Osmańczyk, Edmund Jan (2003). "Jammu and Kashmir.". In Mango, Anthony (ed.). Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements. Vol. 2: G–M (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 1189. ISBN 978-0-415-93922-5. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China.
- ^ Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained Archived 12 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, 11 December 2019.
- ^ "Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019". pib.gov.in. Archived from the original on 16 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
- ^ Slater, Joanna (18 December 2019). "Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 18 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
- Bajpaee, Chietigj (April 2024). "What Democratic Backsliding Means for India" (Document). Chatham House.
- Biswas, Soutik (16 March 2021). "'Electoral autocracy': The downgrading of India's democracy". BBC.
- Bala, Sumathi (16 May 2024). "Modi's strongman rule raises questions about India's 'democratic decline' as he seeks a third term". CNBC.
- "Interview with Indira Gandhi". Interview relecast through India times. TV Eye. 18 December 2016. Archived from the original on 11 August 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
- "Recalling the Emergency years". The Indian Express. 29 June 2015. Archived from the original on 31 May 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
- Mogul, Rhea (15 April 2024). "Narendra Modi: India's popular but controversial leader seeking a transformative third term". CNN. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
- Mehrotra, Karishma; Shih, Gerry (20 April 2024). "As India votes, women and the young could put Modi and BJP over the top". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
- "Modi's Hindu Nationalist Agenda Is Corroding India's Democracy". World Politics Review. 30 October 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
- Gill, Martin (22 June 2022). The Handbook of Security. Springer Nature. p. 158. ISBN 978-3-030-91735-7.
- Leidig, Eviane; Mudde, Cas (9 May 2023). "Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): The overlooked populist radical right party". Journal of Language and Politics. 22 (3): 360–377. doi:10.1075/jlp.22134.lei. ISSN 1569-2159.
- Ammassari, Sofia; Fossati, Diego; McDonnell, Duncan (2023). "Supporters of India's BJP: Distinctly Populist and Nativist". Government and Opposition. 58 (4): 807–823. doi:10.1017/gov.2022.18. ISSN 0017-257X.
- Hansen 1999, p. 85.
- ^ Swain 2001, pp. 71–104.
- ^ Seshia 1998, pp. 1036–1050.
- ^ Gillan 2002, pp. 73–95.
- ^ Sen 2005, p. 63.
- International Religious Freedom Report 2005.
- The Hindu 2002.
- Davies 2005.
- BBC & January 2014.
- "Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul". The Economist. 2 March 2019. Archived from the original on 1 March 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
- ^ Ganguly, Sumit (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead". Journal of Democracy. 25 (4): 56–60. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0077. S2CID 154421269.
- Joshua, Anita (16 July 2014). "Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 2 December 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
- Mukul, Akshaya (18 July 2014). "Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 21 July 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
- Bhatty, Kiran (2019). "School education: Denials and delusions". In Azad, Rohit; Chakraborty, Shouvik; Ramani, Srinivasan; Sinha, Dipa (eds.). A quantum leap in the wrong direction?. ISBN 978-93-5287-618-1. OCLC 1089418969.
- "Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union". pib.gov.in. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- Article 370 rendered toothless, Article 35A ceases to exist Archived 30 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine, The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.
- "The Gazette of India" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
- Ramachandran 2003.
- "Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist". ThePrint. 17 March 2021. Archived from the original on 18 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- Regan, Helen; Gupta, Swati; Khan, Omar. "India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims". CNN. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries.
- Gringlas, Sam. "India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims". NPR. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
- Ellis-Peterson, Hannah; Azizur Rahman, Shaikh (16 March 2020), "Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots", The Guardian, Delhi, archived from the original on 17 March 2020, retrieved 17 March 2020
- Gettleman, Jeffrey; Abi-Habib, Maria (1 March 2020), "In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse", The New York Times, archived from the original on 6 March 2020, retrieved 1 March 2020
- Gettleman, Jeffrey; Yasir, Sameer; Raj, Suhasini; Kumar, Hari (12 March 2020), "'If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims", The New York Times, Photographs by Loke, Atul, archived from the original on 13 March 2020, retrieved 13 March 2020
- Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (6 March 2020), "In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn", The Washington Post, archived from the original on 7 March 2020, retrieved 6 March 2020
- Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (2 March 2020), "What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India", The Washington Post, archived from the original on 3 March 2020, retrieved 15 March 2020
- Times of India 2013.
- Buncombe 2014.
- Ramaseshan 2013.
- Business Standard 2014.
- "Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman'". The Independent. 25 February 2021. Archived from the original on 17 January 2023. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
- ^ Shulman 2000, pp. 365–390.
- Tiwari 2012.
- Guha 2007, pp. 710–720.
- Sen 2005, p. 70.
- Sheela Bhatt 2014.
- ^ Bobbio 2012, pp. 652–668.
- Jaffrelot 2013, pp. 79–95.
- ^ Ruparelia, Sanjay (12 January 2016). "'Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 755–775. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974. ISSN 0085-6401. S2CID 155182560.
- ^ Shah, Alpa; Lerche, Jens (10 October 2015). "India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion". Economic & Political Weekly. 50 (41): 33–36. Archived from the original on 28 March 2023. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
- "Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways". The Times of India. 7 August 2014. Archived from the original on 7 August 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
- Zhong, Raymond (20 November 2014). "Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough?". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 29 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
- "Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls". The Economic Times. 14 March 2018. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 6 February 2019.
- "Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind". The Nikkei. Archived from the original on 20 August 2018. Retrieved 20 August 2018.
- "Why India opted out of world's biggest today". Times of India. 15 November 2020. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- "Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa". Nikkei. 3 December 2020. Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism.
- "Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era". Financial Times. 23 November 2020. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022.
- "India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn". Bloomberg. 19 February 2020. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ^ Ganguly 1999, pp. 148–177.
- ^ Krishnan 2004, pp. 1–37.
- ^ Kux 2002, pp. 93–106.
- ^ Qadir 2002, pp. 1–10.
- ^ Abbas 2004, p. 173.
- Times of India 2002.
- "Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar". The Economic Times. 11 July 2018. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
- "Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered?". The Quint. 14 October 2017. Archived from the original on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
- Mukherjee, Anit (5 May 2021). "The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military". War on the Rocks. Archived from the original on 6 November 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- "BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways". The Financial Express (India). 8 April 2019. Archived from the original on 6 November 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- "Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech". India Today. 16 August 2019. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- Singh, Rahul (24 December 2019). "Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 3 October 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- ^ Chaulia 2002, pp. 215–234.
- ^ Harris 2005, pp. 7–27.
- Inbar, Efraim (2016). US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century. Taylor & Francis. p. 155.
- "Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar". The Hindu. 19 September 2020. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- "Modi's BJP says US State Department targeting India". Reuters. 6 December 2024.
- Lall 2006.
- Pradhan, Sharat. Vajpayee condemns NATO war in Kosovo. Archived 18 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine. Rediff, 29 March 1999.
- Faiola, Anthony. Yugoslavia Air Campaign Ignites Anti-U.S. Sentiment. Archived 15 March 2018 at the Wayback Machine. The Washington Post, 18 May 1999.
- "BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War". Arab News. 5 April 2003. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- "Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs". The Hindu. 23 March 2011. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- "India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit". BBC. 25 December 2015. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- "PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death". Times of India. 18 December 2020. Archived from the original on 22 December 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- "The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand?". Scroll.in. 26 February 2019. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- "Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade". NDTV. 15 November 2015. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- Martin, Michael (22 November 2021). "Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta". Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
- Haidar, Suhasini (22 December 2022). "India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
- "Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers". Livemint. 10 March 2022. Archived from the original on 13 January 2023. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
- "Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China'". Hindustan Times. 26 February 2022. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- "Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions". The Times of India. 3 March 2022. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- Bhattacharyya, Indradeep (1 May 2024). "BJP's 2024 poll campaign is riding on disinformation and Muslim vilification". Alt News. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
- "US State Dept Accuses India of Anti-Semitism for Pushing Conspiracies Against George Soros". The Wire. 6 October 2023. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
- Times of India 2012.
- "BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party". Sydney Morning Herald. 16 October 2022. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
- "How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades". The Times of India. 16 April 2022. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
- "Narendra Modi's Message to America". National Review. 23 June 2022. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or "Indian People's Party") is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development.
- "BJP membership drive from September 1, usually precedes polls to elect party chief". The Hindu. 17 August 2024. Retrieved 24 September 2024.
- "Madhya Pradesh: Man claims he was thrashed for refusing to become BJP member; 4 booked". Deccan Herald.
- Langa, Mahesh (19 September 2024). "BJP membership drive hits controversies in Gujarat". The Hindu. Retrieved 24 September 2024.
- National Informatics Centre 2014.
- Election Commission 1984.
- Election Commission 1989.
- Election Commission 1991.
- Election Commission 1996.
- Election Commission 1998.
- Election Commission 1999.
- Election Commission 2004.
- Election Commission 2009.
- Election Commission 2014.
- Kumar, Sanjay (28 May 2019). "BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 3 December 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
- "20. Performance of National Parties". Election Commission of India. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved 21 December 2020.
- Pisharoty, Sangeeta Barooah (25 May 2016). "BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt'". The Wire. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016.
- "Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance". 25 May 2016. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016.
- "BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge". Archived from the original on 25 May 2016.
General and cited sources
- Sharma, Chetna (2019), "Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016: Continuities and contestations with special reference to politics in Assam, India", Asian Ethnicity, 20 (4): 522–540, doi:10.1080/14631369.2019.1601993, S2CID 150837053
- Sen, Uditi (2018), Citizen Refugee: Forging the Indian Nation after Partition, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-108-42561-2, archived from the original on 14 April 2023, retrieved 16 June 2020
- Jayal, Niraja Gopal (2019), "Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India", South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 42 (1): 33–50, doi:10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874
- Abbas, Hassan (2004). Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-1497-1.
- "Uproar over India mosque report: Inquiry into Babri mosque's demolition in 1992 indicts opposition BJP leaders". Al Jazeera. 24 November 2009. Archived from the original on 31 January 2010. Retrieved 8 July 2014.
- Banerjee, Sumanta (22 July 2005). "Civilising the BJP". Economic & Political Weekly. 40 (29): 3116–3119. JSTOR 4416896.
- "Narendra Modi sworn in as Indian prime minister". BBC News. 26 May 2014. Archived from the original on 2 July 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
- "Indian Astrology vs Indian Science". BBC World Service. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 17 January 2014.
- Bhatt, Sheela. "What Anandiben Patel is really like". Rediff. Archived from the original on 23 June 2014. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- Bobbio, Tommaso (2012). "Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India". Third World Quarterly. 33 (4): 653–668. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.657423. S2CID 154422056. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2019.
- Brass, Paul R. (2005). The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. University of Washington Press. pp. 385–393. ISBN 978-0-295-98506-0.
- Buncombe, Andrew (11 July 2014). "India's gay community scrambling after court decision recriminalises homosexuality". The Independent. Archived from the original on 5 September 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- "It is the govt.'s responsibility to protect LGBT rights, says Harsh Vardhan". Business Standard. Mumbai, India. 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Chaulia, Sreeram (June 2002). "BJP, India's Foreign Policy and the "Realist Alternative" to the Nehruvian Tradition". International Politics. 39 (2): 215–234. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ip.8897388. S2CID 144714683.
- Davies, Richard (2005). "The Cultural Background of Hindutva". In Ayres & Oldenburg, Alyssa & Philip (ed.). India Briefing; Takeoff at Last?. Asia Society.
- "Narendra Modi to be sworn in as 15th Prime Minister of India on May 26". Deccan Chronicle. 20 May 2014. Archived from the original on 27 May 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
- Diwakar, Rekha (2014). "The 16th general election in India, April–May 2014". Electoral Studies. 37: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.005.
- "General Election to Lok Sabha Trends and Results". Election Commission of India. Archived from the original on 18 December 2014. Retrieved 18 June 2014.
- "List of Political Parties and Election Symbols main Notification Dated 18 January 2013" (PDF). India: Election Commission of India. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 October 2013. Retrieved 9 May 2013.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1984 to the Eighth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1989 to the Ninth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 2004 to the Fourteenth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Performance of National Parties" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 December 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- Fitzgerald, Timothy (2011). Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-4411-4290-0. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
- Flint, Colin (2005). The geography of war and peace. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516208-0. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
- Ganguly, Sumit (Spring 1999). "India's Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program". International Security. 23 (4): 148–177. doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.148. JSTOR 2539297. S2CID 57565560.
- Ghassem-Fachandi, Parvis (2012). Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15177-9.
- Gillan, Michael (March 2002). "Refugees or Infiltrators? The Bharatiya Janata Party and "Illegal" Migration from Bangladesh". Asian Studies Review. 26 (1): 73–95. doi:10.1080/10357820208713331. S2CID 146522066.
- Guha, Ramachandra (2007). India after Gandhi: the history of the world's largest democracy (1st ed.). India: Picador. ISBN 978-0-330-39610-3.
- Gupta, Dipankar (2011). Justice before Reconciliation: Negotiating a 'New Normal' in Post-riot Mumbai and Ahmedabad. Routledge. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-415-61254-8.
- Halarnkar, Samar (13 June 2012). "Narendra Modi makes his move". BBC News. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
The right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), India's primary opposition party
- Hansen, Thomas (1999). The saffron wave : democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00671-0.
- Harris, Gardiner (2 July 2012). "Justice and 'a Ray of Hope' After 2002 India Riots". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
- Harris, Jerry (2005). "Emerging Third World powers: China, India and Brazil". Race & Class. 46 (7): 7–27. doi:10.1177/0306396805050014. S2CID 154768728.
- "The Meaning of Verdict 2004". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 14 May 2004. Archived from the original on 16 September 2004. Retrieved 10 December 2013.
- "Inventing History". The Hindu. 14 October 2002.
- "Modi did not incite riots: SIT". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 30 December 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- "2009 Lok Sabha election: Final results tally". Hindustan Times. 17 May 2009. Archived from the original on 11 June 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- "Tehelka sting: How Bangaru Laxman fell for the trap". India Today. 27 April 2012. Archived from the original on 14 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. ISBN 978-1-85065-301-1.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (June 2013). "Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class". Studies in Indian Politics. 1: 2–27. doi:10.1177/2321023013482789. S2CID 154404089.
- Jha, Nilanjana Bhaduri (21 February 2003). "Survey shows temple remains in Ayodhya: VHP". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- Kattakayam, Jiby (27 April 2012). "Bangaru Laxman convicted of taking bribe". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Archived from the original on 1 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- Krishnan, Jayanth (2004). "India's "Patriot Act": POTA and the Impact on Civil Liberties in the World's Largest Democracy". Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice. 22 (2): 265–300. ISSN 2767-1992. Archived from the original on 28 July 2014. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- Krishnan, Murali; Shamil Shams (11 March 2012). "Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
- Kux, Dennis (May–June 2002). "India's Fine Balance". Foreign Affairs. 81 (3): 93–106. doi:10.2307/20033165. JSTOR 20033165.
- Lall, Marie (December 2006). "Indo-Myanmar Relations in the Era of Pipeline Diplomacy". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 28 (3): 424–446. doi:10.1355/CS28-3D (inactive 13 November 2024). S2CID 154093220.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link) - Malik, Yogendra K.; Singh, V.B. (April 1992). "Bharatiya Janata Party: An Alternative to the Congress (I)?". Asian Survey. 32 (4): 318–336. doi:10.2307/2645149. JSTOR 2645149.
- Mathew, Liz (16 May 2014). "Narendra Modi makes election history as BJP gets majority on its own". Live Mint. Archived from the original on 27 May 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
- Naqvi, Saba; Raman, Anuradha (1 April 2013). "Their Dark Glasses". Outlook. Archived from the original on 21 December 2015. Retrieved 23 May 2015.
- "Lok Sabha at a glance". National Informatics Centre. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014. Retrieved 17 July 2014.
- "Report: Sequence of events on December 6". NDTV. Archived from the original on 26 September 2010. Retrieved 20 June 2012.
- "Naroda Patiya riots: Former minister Maya Kodnani gets 28 years in jail". NDTV.com. Archived from the original on 26 December 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
- Noorani, A. G. (March–April 1978). "Foreign Policy of the Janata Party Government". Asian Affairs. 5 (4): 216–228. doi:10.1080/00927678.1978.10554044. JSTOR 30171643.
- Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2008). The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future. Harvard University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-674-03059-6.
- Pai, Sudha (December 1996). "Transformation of the Indian Party System: The 1996 Lok Sabha Elections". Asian Survey. 36 (12): 1170–1183. doi:10.2307/2645573. JSTOR 2645573.
- Qadir, Shaukat (April 2002). "An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999" (PDF). RUSI Journal. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
- Ramachandran, Sujata (15 February 2003). "'Operation Pushback' Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi". Economic & Political Weekly. 38 (7): 637–647. JSTOR 4413218.
- Ramaseshan, Radhika (14 December 2013). "BJP comes out, vows to oppose homosexuality". The Telegraph. Calcutta, India. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 16 December 2013.
- Ramesh, Randeep (14 May 2004). "News World news Shock defeat for India's Hindu nationalists". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 10 December 2013.
- "TDP helps Vajpayee wins confidence vote". Rediff.com. Archived from the original on 2 May 2010. Retrieved 4 January 2011.
- Sen, Amartya (2005). India and the world (1. publ. ed.). Allen Lane: 2005. ISBN 978-0-7139-9687-6.
- Seshia, Shaila (November 1998). "Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party". Asian Survey. 38 (11): 1036–1050. doi:10.2307/2645684. JSTOR 2645684.
- Shulman, Stephen (September 2000). "Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration". International Studies Quarterly. 44 (3): 365–390. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00164.
- Sridharan, Eswaran (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote" (PDF). Journal of Democracy. 25 (4). doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0068. S2CID 154669666. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 January 2015. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
- Swain, Pratap Chandra (2001). Bharatiya Janata Party: Profile and Performance. India: APH publishing. pp. 71–104. ISBN 978-81-7648-257-8. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
- "Bangaru Laxman convicted for taking bribe". Tehelka. Archived from the original on 11 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- "Election results 2014: India places its faith in Moditva". Timesofindia.indiatimes.com. 17 May 2014. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
- "SP condemns Vaiko's arrest under Pota". The Times of India. 13 July 2002. Archived from the original on 16 September 2012.
- "BJP amends constitution allowing Gadkari to get a second term". The Times of India. 28 September 2012. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
- "Stand with RSS, BJP". The Times of India. 20 December 2013. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- Chatterjee, Mohua (13 July 2015). "BJP enrolls 11 crore members, launches 'Mahasampark Abhiyan'". First Post. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
- Tiwari, Aviral Kumar (March 2012). "An Error-Correction Analysis of India-Us Trade Flows". Journal of Economic Development. 37 (1).
- "India: International Religious Freedom Report". US Department of state. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
- Vajpayee, Atal Bihari (2007). Jaffrelot, Christophe (ed.). Hindu Nationalism: A Reader. Delhi: Permanent Black. ISBN 978-0-691-13098-9.
- Varshney, Ashutosh (October 2014). "Hindu Nationalism in Power?". Journal of Democracy. 25 (4): 34–45. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0071. S2CID 144608424.
Further reading
Main article: Bibliography of the Sangh Parivar- Ahuja, Gurdas M. (2004). Bharatiya Janata Party and Resurgent India. Ram Company.
- Andersen, Walter K.; Damle, Shridhar D. (1987) . The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism. Delhi: Vistaar Publications.
- Bhambhri, C.P. (2001). Bharatiya Janata Party : Periphery to Centre. Delhi: Shipra. ISBN 978-81-7541-078-7.
- Baxter, Craig (1971) . The Jana Sangh — A Biography of an Indian Political Party. Oxford University Press, Bombay. ISBN 978-0-8122-7583-4.
- Chadha, Kalyani; Guha, Pallavi (2016). "The Bharatiya Janata Party's online campaign and citizen involvement in India's 2014 election". International Journal of Communication. 10. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- Ganguly, Sumit (2015). "Hindu nationalism and the foreign policy of India's Bharatiya Janata Party" (PDF). Transatlantic Academy Paper Series. 2: 1–15. ISBN 978-1-5292-0460-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
- Graham, B. D. (1990). Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and Development of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-38348-6.
- Harriss, John (2015). "Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 712–718. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826. S2CID 147615034.
- Malik, Yogendra K.; Singh, V.B. (1994). Hindu Nationalists in India : The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-8810-6.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. ISBN 978-1-85065-301-1.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (July 2003). "Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?" (PDF). Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics: 16. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 December 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
- Jain, Varsha; B.E., Ganesh (2020). "Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders: A Case of India and Narendra Modi". Journal of Political Marketing. 19 (1–2): 15–33. doi:10.1080/15377857.2019.1652222. S2CID 202247610.
- Mishra, Madhusudan (1997). Bharatiya Janata Party and India's Foreign Policy. New Delhi: Uppal Pub. House. ISBN 978-81-85565-79-8.
- Nag, Kingshuk (2014). The Saffron Tide: The Rise of the BJP. Rupa Publications. ISBN 978-8129134295.
- Nag, Kingshuk. Atal Bihari Vajpayee (Rupa Publications, 2016).
- Palshikar, Suhas, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Lodha, eds. Electoral Politics in India: The Resurgence of the Bharatiya Janata Party (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
- Raghavan, G.N.S. New Era in the Indian Polity, A Study of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the BJP (1996).
- Sanjeev Kr, H. M. (2007). "Foreign Policy Position of Bharatiya Janata Party Towards Issues of India Pakistan Relations". The Indian Journal of Political Science. 68 (2): 275–291. JSTOR 41856327. Archived from the original on 13 January 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
- Sharma, C.P. Thakur, Devendra P. (1999). India under Atal Behari Vajpayee : The BJP Era. New Delhi: UBS Publishers' Distributors. ISBN 978-81-7476-250-4.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Stein, Burton (2010). A history of India (edited by David Arnold. 2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-9509-6.
- Rao, Ramesh (2001). Coalition conundrum: the BJP's trials, tribulations, and triumphs. Har Anand. ISBN 9788124108093.
External links
- Official website
- BJP web resources provided by GovPubs at the University of Colorado Boulder Libraries
- Works by or about Bharatiya Janata Party at the Internet Archive
- Bharatiya Janata Party at the Encyclopædia Britannica
- Bharatiya Janata Party
- 1980 establishments in India
- Anti-communist parties
- Anti-communism in India
- Conservative parties in India
- Far-right political parties in India
- Hindu nationalist political parties
- Hindu organisations based in India
- Hindutva
- Identity politics in India
- Indian Hindu political parties
- Indian nationalist political parties
- International Democracy Union
- National conservative parties
- National political parties in India
- Nationalist parties in India
- Neoliberal parties
- Political parties established in 1980
- Right-wing populism in India
- Right-wing populist parties
- Social conservative parties
- Sangh Parivar