Revision as of 05:50, 15 January 2006 view sourceBoothy443 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,606 edits →Oppose← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:26, 11 May 2022 view source WOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators854,737 editsm Fix lint errors | ||
(31 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# Make peace in Misplaced Pages! | # Make peace in Misplaced Pages! | ||
# And help make this the best encyclopedia there is! | # And help make this the best encyclopedia there is! | ||
So you've seen the rest, now vote for the ], I am ] | ]<br> | So you've seen the rest, now vote for the ], I am ] | ]<br> | ||
] | ] | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
#'''Support'''] 04:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Support'''] 04:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Support'''] 08:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Support'''] 08:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Support''' ] 22:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Weak Support'''] 16:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC) This candidate would expand the diversity of the Committee. | |||
#'''Support''' ] 23:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Weak Support''' Also concerned about lack of experience ] - [[User talk:Wrp103|Talk]] 18:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#:'''Weak Support''' ] - [[User talk:Wrp103|Talk]] 18:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#:*] voted twice. ] 00:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Support''' ] 20:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Support''' ] 05:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC) like the relaxed attitude | |||
#'''Support''' ]''|''<SUP>]</SUP> {{time}} | |||
==Oppose== | ==Oppose== | ||
Line 33: | Line 42: | ||
#] <small><sup>] ] </sup></small> 00:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #] <small><sup>] ] </sup></small> 00:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#--] ] 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #--] ] 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#—]]] 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #—]]] 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#] 00:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #] 00:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. As per Talrias ] 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. As per Talrias ] 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 64: | Line 73: | ||
#:*Stevecov does not have suffrage; he had only 148 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). —] ] 04:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #:*Stevecov does not have suffrage; he had only 148 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). —] ] 04:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. Too inexperienced. ] ] 04:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. Too inexperienced. ] ] 04:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. ] <sup |
#'''Oppose'''. ] ] 04:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' ] 05:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' ] 05:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' Too new. — ]\<sup>]</sup> 05:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' Too new. — ]\<sup>]</sup> 05:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 71: | Line 80: | ||
#'''Oppose'''. ]] 05:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. ]] 05:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. -- ] ] 06:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. -- ] ] 06:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. xp ] 06:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. xp ] 06:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' - Not enough substance in candidate statement. --] 06:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' - Not enough substance in candidate statement. --] 06:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. ] 06:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. ] 06:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 82: | Line 91: | ||
#'''Oppose''' on inexperience. ] 10:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' on inexperience. ] 10:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''', as Jonathunder. --] 10:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''', as Jonathunder. --] 10:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''', Arbitrators require more experience. ] ] <sup>]</sup> 11:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''', Arbitrators require more experience. ] ] <sup>]</sup> 11:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#Too little XP. —] ] 11:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #Too little XP. —] ] 11:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' as per ]. The campaigning tagline also irks me. ] 11:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' as per ]. The campaigning tagline also irks me. ] 11:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Strong Oppose''' - Sorry nothing personal, but you have nowhere near enough exp. --- ''Responses to ].'' Signed by ] @ 12:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Strong Oppose''' - Sorry nothing personal, but you have nowhere near enough exp. --- ''Responses to ].'' Signed by ] @ 12:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. ]]] 12:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. ]]] 12:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''', lack of experience. ]]] 12:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''', lack of experience. ]]] 12:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' - Your enthusiasm has been noted. Better luck next time. ]|<font face="arial, helvetica" size="0"><sub>]</sub></font> 13:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' - Your enthusiasm has been noted. Better luck next time. ]|<font face="arial, helvetica" size="0"><sub>]</sub></font> 13:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''', needs experience. ] 14:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''', needs experience. ] 14:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 97: | Line 106: | ||
#'''Oppose''' ack ] - show lack of experience. --] 18:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' ack ] - show lack of experience. --] 18:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' Doesn't seem experienced, or very serious about the position. ] 20:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' Doesn't seem experienced, or very serious about the position. ] 20:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. Has been ''registered'' long enough, but hasn't been ''active'' long enough. ]]]''']''' 21:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. Has been ''registered'' long enough, but hasn't been ''active'' long enough. ]]]''']''' 21:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. Insufficient experience. —] (]:]) 21:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. Insufficient experience. —] (]:]) 21:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. Not having had an edit war is not a criterion. It would actually help. ] 22:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. Not having had an edit war is not a criterion. It would actually help. ] 22:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. Experience. ] 22:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC). | #'''Oppose'''. Experience. ] 22:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC). | ||
#'''Oppose'''. Insufficient demonstration of involvement and understanding of the task.--]< |
#'''Oppose'''. Insufficient demonstration of involvement and understanding of the task.--]<span style="color:#DAA520;"> | </span>] 23:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#Ajwebb (lack of) Experience ] 23:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | #Ajwebb (lack of) Experience ] 23:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. I would like to see evidence of work for the encyclopedia. --] 01:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. I would like to see evidence of work for the encyclopedia. --] 01:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 116: | Line 125: | ||
# '''Oppose''', insufficient experience -- ] 14:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | # '''Oppose''', insufficient experience -- ] 14:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
# '''Oppose''', lack of exerience. - ](]) 15:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | # '''Oppose''', lack of exerience. - ](]) 15:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
# '''Oppose''', lack of exerience.--] ʈ ] 17:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | # '''Oppose''', lack of exerience.--] ʈ ] 17:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
# Lacks experience. ]<sup>] </sup> 20:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | # Lacks experience. ]<sup>] </sup> 20:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose''' -- ] 21:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' -- ] 21:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
# '''Oppose''', lack of experience. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | # '''Oppose''', lack of experience. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. <small>''(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contibutions or personally.)''</small> - ] 00:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. <small>''(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contibutions or personally.)''</small> - ] 00:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Oppose'''. Only 874 edits since last march. Though not to get editcountitis, there's also not a whole lot of info on his user talk page to tell me how he has resolved disputes in the past. ] 01:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. Only 874 edits since last march. Though not to get editcountitis, there's also not a whole lot of info on his user talk page to tell me how he has resolved disputes in the past. ] 01:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 139: | Line 148: | ||
#'''Oppose'''. ] 05:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. ] 05:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#--] | ] 05:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | #--] | ] 05:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#:'''Oppose''' it would be nice if the canidate would answer question, but also, he lacks experince in disputes...] 06:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#:*CuBiXcRaYfIsH does not have suffrage; he . (]) —] ] 16:37, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose'''. Stood so late that candidate couldn't properly be investigated via hustings, perhaps deliberately. --] | ] 18:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose''' per Talrias and Dr Cash. ] 14:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose'''. --] 20:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
# '''Oppose''' ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 23:53, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#:'''Oppose'''. Sorry. ] 00:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#::User had less than 150 edits at the start of the election, so may not have suffrage. ] <small>(])</small> 02:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
# Lack of experience, somewhat naive promises in candidate statement. ] 14:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose''' lack of experience. ] 16:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#There's a difference between judging someone by the length of their path and just not having enough experience for the job. ] ] 17:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose''' ] 22:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose''', despite admirable attitude; inexperienced. —] <small>(] • ])</small> 17:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose''', immature demeanor - ] 03:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#:'''Oppose''', lack of experience.] 02:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#:*Nortonew does not have suffrage; he had only as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (]) —] ] 05:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#''']''' ] <small>(])</small> 01:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
#'''Oppose''' RFA'a are not a place of bringinng people together, they often result in sanctions and difficult decisions. (] 06:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)) | |||
#'''Oppose''' ] 23:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:26, 11 May 2022
Aytakin
Hello to everyone and a happy holidays!!!
My name as you know is Aytakin and I have been using and editing at Misplaced Pages a long time. First without a username and then with my current username. During my time in Misplaced Pages, I have never been in a argument or a revert war. I always try to discuss everything out instead of attacking. I have always been a great arbitrator and mediator in my whole life and have settled many conflicts. Currently, I am studying law and philosophy on the side and I think these will definitly help me as an Arbitration Committee member.
I will strive to:
- Decrease the tension created between wikipedians!
- Make peace in Misplaced Pages!
- And help make this the best encyclopedia there is!
So you've seen the rest, now vote for the best, I am Aytakin | Talk
Support
- Weak Support - Has the right background and intentions, and a well-organized user page. All suggest that he may do OK in this job. However, I am concerned on the experience issue too. --EMS | Talk 06:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Kefalonia 09:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Yid613 09:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yid613 likely does not have suffrage; his first edit was at 05:18, 21 November 2005 (UTC). (caveats) —Cryptic (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - peace and tension relief are good.--Ahwaz 11:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ahwaz does not have suffrage; he had only 130 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (caveats) —Cryptic (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Yid613 09:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Davidpdx 12:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Meekohi 13:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Tarret 20:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --HK 22:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, reluctantly. I approve but am slightly concerned about user's lack of experience. 青い(Aoi) 10:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support, Also concerned about user's lack of experience. The Jade Knight 19:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support "Never argued" has its points. Septentrionalis 19:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support like response to Anarchism situation. Harrypotter 22:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- SupportAlex43223 04:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- SupportNokhodi 08:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Itake 22:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Supportevrik 16:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC) This candidate would expand the diversity of the Committee.
- Support Slavik IVANOV 23:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support Also concerned about lack of experience wrp103 (Bill Pringle) - ] 18:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support wrp103 (Bill Pringle) - ] 18:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- wrp103 voted twice. Chick Bowen 00:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support wrp103 (Bill Pringle) - ] 18:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Emersoni 20:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Carptrash 05:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC) like the relaxed attitude
- Support Pacific Coast Highway| 20:29, 5 December 2024 UTC
Oppose
- Oppose, lack of experience. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Zach 00:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- --Jaranda 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- —Kirill Lokshin 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Michael Snow 00:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. As per Talrias Batmanand 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Inexperience - Mackensen (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of experience. --Interiot 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. --GraemeL 00:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Madame Sosostris 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose inexperience. David | explanation | Talk 00:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose.--ragesoss 00:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Cryptic (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose not experienced. --Angelo 00:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- – Quadell 00:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, inexperience. Carbonite | Talk 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too new. Ambi 00:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Reluctant oppose because the amount of verifiable experience on Misplaced Pages is somewhat limited. Jonathunder 01:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry --Doc 01:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Inexperienced. --Viriditas 01:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose - inexperience - Wikipedical (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)- Account too new (created December 28, 2005 ). — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 03:08, Jan. 9, 2006
- older≠wiser 03:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose.Crunch 03:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Bobet 03:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose,
per Freakofnurture.Ian Manka 03:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)- I read Freakofnurture's comment wrong, but the user is inexperienced. Ian Manka 03:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose for inexperience. Dave 03:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too new. Good luck with future contributions. 172 03:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - it's an experience thing. - Stevecov 04:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Stevecov does not have suffrage; he had only 148 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). —Cryptic (talk) 04:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - it's an experience thing. - Stevecov 04:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too inexperienced. Paul August ☎ 04:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. SlimVirgin 04:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Tony the Marine 05:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Too new. — Catherine\ 05:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Hamster Sandwich 05:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose fluffy bunny no-content candidate statement. Fifelfoo 05:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. android79 05:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. -- Scott e 06:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. xp Grue 06:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not enough substance in candidate statement. --Muchness 06:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. siafu 06:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. · Katefan0/mrp 06:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per Fifelfoo.--cj | talk 07:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose —Quarl 2006-01-09 07:34Z
- Oppose. Inexperience. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Lupo 09:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per Muchness --kingboyk 09:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose on inexperience. Sarah Ewart 10:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, as Jonathunder. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 10:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, Arbitrators require more experience. the wub "?!" 11:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Too little XP. —Nightstallion (?) 11:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Muchness. The campaigning tagline also irks me. Thryduulf 11:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Sorry nothing personal, but you have nowhere near enough exp. --- Responses to Chazz's talk page. Signed by Chazz @ 12:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry but I must oppose. ALKIVAR™ 12:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of experience. Radiant_>|< 12:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Your enthusiasm has been noted. Better luck next time. Ξxtreme Unction|yakkity yak 13:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, needs experience. Awolf002 14:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I do not see the "never been in an argument" part (as per candidate statement) as a strength; not for a potential arbitrator, anyway.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 14:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose The Literate Engineer 15:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Not enough experience. Comics 17:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, see Thryduulf's comment Masonpatriot 17:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Jkelly 17:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose ack User:Ezhiki - show lack of experience. --Wikimol 18:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Doesn't seem experienced, or very serious about the position. Jared 20:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Has been registered long enough, but hasn't been active long enough. Hermione1980 21:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Insufficient experience. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 21:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Splash 22:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not having had an edit war is not a criterion. It would actually help. Avriette 22:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Experience. William M. Connolley 22:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC).
- Oppose. Insufficient demonstration of involvement and understanding of the task.--cjllw | TALK 23:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ajwebb (lack of) Experience Avalon 23:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I would like to see more evidence of work for the encyclopedia. --JWSchmidt 01:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of experience. -- SCZenz 01:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Vsmith 01:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Experience. Velvetsmog 01:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Neutrality 04:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Raven4x4x 08:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Adrian Buehlmann 10:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 10:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Lack of experience. __earth 12:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose as above. enochlau (talk) 13:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, insufficient experience -- Gurch 14:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of exerience. - Liberatore(T) 15:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of exerience.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 17:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Lacks experience. JoaoRicardo 20:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Krash 21:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of experience. Prodego 22:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contibutions or personally.) - Mailer Diablo 00:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Only 874 edits since last march. Though not to get editcountitis, there's also not a whole lot of info on his user talk page to tell me how he has resolved disputes in the past. Dr. Cash 01:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Timrollpickering 01:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose KTC 03:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose--Masssiveego 07:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of experience. Majority of edits are on user's own page. --Hurricane111 16:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose--Dr. B 17:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose--User said he's been editing for a long time without username, but can't verify and it's not the same anyway. Superm401 | Talk 02:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Sunray 07:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --Ignignot 16:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose – ABCD✉ 17:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose due to lack of experience. Bahn Mi 19:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - lack of experience -- Francs2000 01:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose still new, but I'm sure there's a lot of potential for future elections. Deckiller 01:13, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose lack of experience. --Mononoke 10:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose arbitrators need to decisive, once they are involved a decision needs to be made Gnangarra 15:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose lack of experience in disputes. -- Marcika 18:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Preaky 05:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose it would be nice if the canidate would answer question, but also, he lacks experince in disputes...CuBiXcRaYfIsH 06:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- CuBiXcRaYfIsH does not have suffrage; he registered at 22:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC). (caveats) —Cryptic (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose it would be nice if the canidate would answer question, but also, he lacks experince in disputes...CuBiXcRaYfIsH 06:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Stood so late that candidate couldn't properly be investigated via hustings, perhaps deliberately. --Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 18:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per Talrias and Dr Cash. Youngamerican 14:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. --moof 20:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Bratsche 23:53, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sorry. Detriment 00:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- User had less than 150 edits at the start of the election, so may not have suffrage. Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sorry. Detriment 00:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Lack of experience, somewhat naive promises in candidate statement. Guettarda 14:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose lack of experience. kaal 16:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- There's a difference between judging someone by the length of their path and just not having enough experience for the job. Ingoolemo 17:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Tuohirulla 22:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, despite admirable attitude; inexperienced. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, immature demeanor - JustinWick 03:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of experience.Nortonew 02:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Nortonew does not have suffrage; he had only 138 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (caveats) —Cryptic (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, lack of experience.Nortonew 02:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose RFA'a are not a place of bringinng people together, they often result in sanctions and difficult decisions. (Bjorn Tipling 06:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC))
- Oppose CDThieme 23:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)