Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Quaque: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:59, 15 January 2006 view sourceBoothy443 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,606 edits →Oppose← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:25, 11 May 2022 view source WOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators854,737 editsm Fix lint errors 
(16 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
#:'''Support''' ] 02:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC) #:'''Support''' ] 02:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
#:*Ciriii does not have suffrage; he and he had only as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (]) &mdash;] ] 03:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC) #:*Ciriii does not have suffrage; he and he had only as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (]) &mdash;] ] 03:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
] 23:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #:] 23:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#::] does not have suffrage; he/she is not a registered user of Misplaced Pages. — ] <sup>]</sup> 07:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#


==Oppose== ==Oppose==
Line 20: Line 20:
#'''Oppose.''' Too new. ] 00:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose.''' Too new. ] 00:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#] ] 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #] ] 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#&mdash;]]] 00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #&mdash;]]] 00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Inexperience - ] ] 00:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - Inexperience - ] ] 00:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. --] ] 00:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. --] ] 00:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 32: Line 32:
#'''Oppose'''. ] (drop me a ]) 03:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] (drop me a ]) 03:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''.--] 03:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''.--] 03:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 04:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] ] 04:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#] 04:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #] 04:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Too new. ] 04:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' Too new. ] 04:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 39: Line 39:
#'''Oppose'''--] | ] 06:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''--] | ] 06:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] ] 07:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] ] 07:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] (]) 07:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] (]) 07:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#&mdash;] ] 12:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #&mdash;] ] 12:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. &nbsp;]]] 13:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' sorry but I must oppose. &nbsp;]]] 13:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] 14:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. ] 14:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', xp. ]]] 14:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', xp. ]]] 14:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. --] 15:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. --] 15:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', lack of experience. ] ] <sup>]</sup> 15:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', lack of experience. ] ] <sup>]</sup> 15:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Lack of experience.&mdash;] 17:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Lack of experience.&mdash;] 17:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', userboxes. --] 19:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', userboxes. --] 19:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 59: Line 59:
#'''Oppose''', too new. ] 19:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', too new. ] 19:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Lack of experience &mdash; ] <small>(])</small> 19:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' Lack of experience &mdash; ] <small>(])</small> 19:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', Lack of experience. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', Lack of experience. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Inability to address arbitration in candidate statement ] 22:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Inability to address arbitration in candidate statement ] 22:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' <small>''(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.)''</small> - ] 01:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' <small>''(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.)''</small> - ] 01:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 68: Line 68:
#'''Oppose''' &ndash; ]'']''']]'''''] 18:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' &ndash; ]'']''']]'''''] 18:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - inexperienced. --] 21:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' - inexperienced. --] 21:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' alas, lack of experience. --] <sup>]</sup> 00:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' alas, lack of experience. --] <sup>]</sup> 00:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Candidate statement missing substance. ] 01:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Candidate statement missing substance. ] 01:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' ] 17:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''' ] 17:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', too new -- ] ] 00:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose''', too new -- ] ] 00:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Inexperience. -] (<small>] | ]</small>) 06:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. Inexperience. --] (<small>] | ]</small>) 06:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Opppose'''. Inexperienced. --] 00:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC) #'''Opppose'''. Inexperienced. --] 00:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#--] | ] 05:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC) #--] | ] 05:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Stood so late that candidate couldn't properly be investigated via hustings, perhaps deliberately. --] | ] 18:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' --] 21:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Inexperience. ] | ] 00:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. ] 00:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. XP -- ] 05:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''': I hate piling on, but I support lack of ambiguity when it comes to new accounts running for ArbCom. ] 22:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
# ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 05:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' inexperience ] - &#91;&#91;User talk:Wrp103&#124;Talk]] 20:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' statement indicates support for removal of due process from the Arbcom ] 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' per what most folks have already said. —] <small>(] • ])</small> 07:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
#''']''' ] <small>(])</small> 02:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' ] 12:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

==Neutral==
#'''Neutral'''. Not going to pile it on. ] 18:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:25, 11 May 2022

Quaque

I have been following Misplaced Pages development for a few years now, and have recently returned to editing after a long break. I have seen a lot of cases go through, so my aim as an arbitrator is simple. To keep Misplaced Pages a decent encyclopedia and to deal with those who wish to corrupt it. The current system is too slow, and lots of damage has occurred and vandals don't take the system seriously.

I have dealt with a large number of vandals and nonsense over the years and know a lot of the technical goings on at the wiki, so I feel confident on being able to take on the challenge of dealing with these disputes and restore credibility to the system.

Questions

Support

  1. Support. --Kefalonia 09:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    Support Ciriii 02:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
    88.108.28.247 23:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
    88.108.28.247 does not have suffrage; he/she is not a registered user of Misplaced Pages. — Ian Manka 07:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose, lack of experience. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Michael Snow 00:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Zach 00:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose inexperience. David | explanation | Talk 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose. Too new. Ambi 00:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Cryptic (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. —Kirill Lokshin 00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. Oppose - Inexperience - Mackensen (talk) 00:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  9. Oppose. --GraemeL 00:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  10. --Jaranda 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  11. Oppose A potentially good candidate, but just too inexperienced now. In future, I would potentially support. But now is too soon. Sorry. Batmanand 01:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  12. Oppose as per Batmanand --Angelo 01:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  13. Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  14. Oppose, experience. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    Oppose - inexperience - Wikipedical (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    Account too new (created December 28, 2005 ). — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 03:38, Jan. 9, 2006
  15. Oppose. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 03:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  16. Oppose.--ragesoss 03:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  17. Oppose. SlimVirgin 04:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  18. Bobet 04:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  19. Oppose Too new. 172 04:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  20. Oppose Vague answers--Crunch 05:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  21. Oppose. android79 06:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  22. Oppose--cj | talk 06:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  23. Oppose. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  24. Oppose. Elle vécut heureusement toujours dorénavant (Be eudaimonic!) 07:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  25. —Nightstallion (?) 12:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  26. Oppose sorry but I must oppose.  ALKIVAR™ 13:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  27. Oppose.  Grue  14:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  28. Oppose, xp. Radiant_>|< 14:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  29. Oppose. --Viriditas 15:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  30. Oppose, lack of experience. the wub "?!" 15:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  31. Oppose. Lack of experience.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 17:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  32. Oppose, userboxes. --Wikimol 19:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  33. Oppose - Too new. Awolf002 20:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  34. Oppose - too new. —Quarl 2006-01-09 21:09Z
  35. Oppose - vagueness. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 21:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  36. Splash 23:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  37. Oppose. No qualification of "deal with". Avriette 23:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  38. older≠wiser 02:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  39. Oppose. siafu 04:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  40. Oppose Account too new, no other history available. --EMS | Talk 04:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  41. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 12:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  42. Oppose, too new. HGB 19:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  43. Oppose Lack of experience — Comics (Talk) 19:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  44. Oppose, Lack of experience. Prodego 20:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  45. Oppose. Inability to address arbitration in candidate statement Fifelfoo 22:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  46. Oppose (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) - Mailer Diablo 01:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  47. Oppose. enochlau (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC)#Oppose. --Masssiveego 07:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  48. - Vote Signed By: Chazz- Place comments here
  49. Oppose. Recently started user account. --JWSchmidt 20:33, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  50. Oppose, inexperience. — Ian Manka 22:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  51. Oppose – ABCD✉ 18:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  52. Oppose - inexperienced. --NorkNork 21:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  53. Oppose alas, lack of experience. --Loopy 00:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  54. Oppose. Candidate statement missing substance. Velvetsmog 01:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  55. Oppose Dr. B 17:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  56. Oppose, too new -- Francs2000 00:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  57. Oppose. Inexperience. --Aude (talk | contribs) 06:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  58. Opppose. Inexperienced. --William Pietri 00:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  59. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  60. Oppose. Stood so late that candidate couldn't properly be investigated via hustings, perhaps deliberately. --Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 18:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  61. Oppose --Adrian Buehlmann 21:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
  62. Oppose. Inexperience. Superm401 | Talk 00:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  63. Oppose. Preaky 00:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  64. Oppose. XP -- Masonpatriot 05:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  65. Oppose: I hate piling on, but I support lack of ambiguity when it comes to new accounts running for ArbCom. Geogre 22:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  66. Bratsche 05:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  67. Oppose inexperience wrp103 (Bill Pringle) - ] 20:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  68. Oppose statement indicates support for removal of due process from the Arbcom Cynical 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  69. Oppose per what most folks have already said. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  70. Oppose Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  71. Oppose KTC 12:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Neutral. Not going to pile it on. Youngamerican 18:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)