Misplaced Pages

Ibn al-Shatir: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:28, 29 March 2010 editJagged 85 (talk | contribs)87,237 edits Theory: actually, he didn't completely seperate from natural philosophy← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:05, 10 December 2024 edit undoTheBirdsShedTears (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers43,898 edits punctuationTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
(208 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Arab astronomer and clockmaker (1304–1375)}}
'''Ala Al-Din Abu'l-Hasan Ali Ibn Ibrahim Ibn al-Shatir''' (1304 – 1375) ({{lang-ar|ابن الشاطر}}) was an ] ], ], ] and ] who worked as ''muwaqqit'' (موقت, religious ]) at the ] in ], ].
{{Infobox person
| name = Ibn al-Shatir
| image = Ibn-al-shatir2.gif
| caption = Ibn al-Shatir's lunar model.
| birth_date = 1304
| birth_place = ], ]
| death_date = 1375 (aged 71)
| occupation = ]
| works = kitab nihayat al-sul fi tashih al-usul
}}


'''ʿAbu al-Ḥasan Alāʾ al‐Dīn bin Alī bin Ibrāhīm bin Muhammad bin al-Matam al-Ansari''',<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Roberts |first1=Victor |title=The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Latitudes of the Planets |journal=Isis |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=208–219 |date=1966|jstor=227960 |doi=10.1086/350114 |s2cid=143576999 }}</ref> known as '''Ibn al-Shatir''' or '''Ibn ash-Shatir''' ({{langx|ar|ابن الشاطر}}; 1304–1375) was an Arab ], ] and ]. He worked as '']'' (موقت, timekeeper) in the ] in ] and constructed a ] for its ] in 1371/72.
==Astronomy==
], showing the multiplication of ]s using the ], thus eliminating the Ptolemaic eccentrics and ].]]


===Theory=== == Biography ==
Ibn al-Shatir was born in ], ] around the year 1304. His father died when he was six years old. His grandfather took him in which resulted in Ibn al-Shatir learning the craft of inlaying ivory.<ref name=":3">{{Cite book|last=Freely|first=John|title=Light from the East: how the Science of Medieval Islam helped to shape the Western World|publisher=]|year=2015|isbn=978-1784531386}}</ref> Ibn al-Shatir traveled to Cairo and Alexandria to study astronomy, where he fell in, inspired him.<ref name=":3" /> After completing his studies with Abu 'Ali al-Marrakushi, Ibn al-Shatir returned to his home in Damascus where he was then appointed ''muwaqqit'' (timekeeper) of the Umayyad Mosque.<ref name=":3" /> Part of his duties as ''muqaqqit'' involved keeping track of the times of the five daily prayers and when the month of Ramadan would begin and end.<ref name="Freely, John. 2010">{{Cite book|last=Freely, John.|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/772844807|title=Light from the East : How the Science of Medieval Islam helped to shape the Western World.|date=2010|publisher=I.B. Tauris|isbn=978-0-85772-037-5|location=London|oclc=772844807}}</ref> To accomplish this, he created a variety of astronomical instruments. He made several astronomical observations and calculations both for the purposes of the mosque, and to fuel his later research. These observations and calculations were organized in a series of astronomical tables.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last=Abbud|first=Fuad|date=December 1962|title=The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Reduction of the Geometric Models to Numerical Tables|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/349635|journal=Isis|volume=53|issue=4|pages=492–499|doi=10.1086/349635|s2cid=121312064 |issn=0021-1753}}</ref> His first set of tables, which have been lost over time, allegedly combined his observations with those of Ptolemy, and contained entries on the Sun, Moon and Earth.<ref name="Freely, John. 2010"/>
His most important astronomical treatise was the ''Kitab nihayat al-sul fi tashih al-usul'' (''The Final Quest Concerning the Rectification of Principles''), in which he drastically reformed the ] of the ], ], and ], by his introducing his own non-Ptolemaic models which eliminates the ] in the solar model, which eliminate the eccentrics and ] by introducing extra epicycles in the planetary models via the ], and which eliminates all eccentrics, epicycles and equant in the ].<ref name=Saliba-1994/>


==Astronomy==
While previous ] models were just as accurate as the Ptolemaic model, Ibn al-Shatir's geometrical model was the first that was actually superior to the Ptolemaic model in terms of its better agreement with ] ]s. Another achievement of Ibn al-Shatir was the rejection of the Ptolemaic model on empirical rather than ] grounds. Unlike previous astronomers before him, Ibn al-Shatir was not concerned with adhering to the theoretical principles of ] or ] (or ]), but rather to produce a model that was more consistent with ] observations. His model was thus in better agreement with empirical ]s than any previous models produced before him. His work thus marked a turning point in astronomy, which may be considered a "Scientific Revolution before the Renaissance".<ref name=Saliba-1994>] (1994), ''A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories During the Golden Age of Islam'', p. 233-234 & 240, ], ISBN 0814780237.</ref>
Ibn al-Shatir′s most important astronomical treatise was ''kitab nihayat al-sul fi tashih al-usul'' (نهاية السول في تصحيح الاصول "The Final Quest Concerning the Rectification of Principles"). In it he refined the ] of the ], ] and ]. His model incorporated the ], and eliminated the need for an ] (a point on the opposite side of the center of the larger circle from the Earth) by introducing an extra epicycle (the ]), departing from the Ptolemaic system in a way that was mathematically identical (but conceptually very different) to what ] did in the 16th century. This new planetary model was published in his work the ''al-Zij al-jadid (الزيج الجديد The New Planetary Handbook.)''<ref name="Freely, John. 2010"/> Before the ''kitab nihayat al-sul fi tashih al-usul'' was made, there was a treatise that Ibn al-Shatir made which described the observations and procedures that lead to him creating his new planetary models.<ref name="Freely, John. 2010" />


]
===Testing===
Unlike previous astronomers, Ibn al-Shatir generally had no philosophical objections against Ptolemaic astronomy, but was only concerned with how well it matched his own ] observations. He employed careful observations of the diameters of the Sun and Moon to test the Ptolemaic models on empirical grounds, testing "the Ptolemaic value for the apparent size of the solar disk by using ] observations." His work on his experiments and observations, however, has not survived, but there are references to this work in his ''The Final Quest Concerning the Rectification of Principles''.<ref>] (1994), ''A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories During the Golden Age of Islam'', p. 238, ], ISBN 0814780237.</ref>


Drawing on the observation that the distance to the Moon did not change as drastically as required by Ptolemy's lunar model, Ibn al-Shatir produced a new lunar model that replaced Ptolemy's crank mechanism with a double epicycle model that computed a more accurate range of distances of the Moon from the Earth.<ref>]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-03-26|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|reason= }}, volume&nbsp;3 at pages&nbsp;1108–1109.</ref>
As a consequence of his ]s, he formulated his own modification of the Ptolemaic model. Ibn al-Shatir's concern with the observed solar diameter led him to replace Ptolemy's ] and ] solar model with a model using three spheres, a large sphere centered on the Earth which he called the parecliptic, a smaller sphere carried by the pareclptic, which he called the the deferent, and an even smaller sphere carried by the deferent, which he called the director. The Sun was then carried by the director.<ref>] (1994), ''A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories During the Golden Age of Islam'', p. 239, ], ISBN 0814780237.</ref>


===Influence=== === Solar Model ===
Ibn al-Shatir's Solar Model exemplifies his commitment towards accurate observational data, and its creation serves as a general improvement towards the Ptolemaic model. When observing the Ptolemaic solar model, it is clear that most of the observations are not accounted for, and cannot accommodate the observed variations of the apparent size of the solar diameter.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Saliba|first=George|date=1987|title=Theory and Observation in Islamic Astronomy: The Work of IBN AL-SHĀTIR of Damascus|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002182868701800102|journal=Journal for the History of Astronomy|language=en| volume=18|pages=35–43 |doi=10.1177/002182868701800102|s2cid=115311028 }}</ref> Because the Ptolemaic system contains some faulty numerical values for its observations, the actual geocentric distance of the Sun had been greatly underestimated in its solar model. And with the problems that had arisen from the Ptolemaic models, there was an influx of need to create solutions that would resolve them. Ibn al-Shatir's model aimed to do just that, creating a new eccentricity for the solar model. And with his numerous observations, Ibn al-Shatir was able to generate a new maximum solar equation (2;2,6°), which he found to have occurred at the mean longitude λ 97° or 263° from the ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Roberts|first=Victor|date=1957|title=The Solar and Lunar Theory of Ibn ash-Shāṭir: A Pre-Copernican Copernican Model|journal=Isis|volume=48|issue=4|pages=428–432|doi=10.1086/348609 |jstor=227515 |s2cid=120033970 |issn=0021-1753}}</ref> As the method was deciphered through geometric ways, it was easy to identify that 7;7 and 2;7 were the radii of the epicycles.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roberts|first=Victor|title=The Solar and Lunar Theory of Ibn ash-Shāṭir: A Pre-Copernican Copernican Model|url=https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Math/Aydin/Teach/Fall14/128/PreCopernican.pdf|journal=Chicago Journals|volume=48|pages=428–432}}</ref> In addition, his final results for apparent size of the solar diameter were concluded to be ''at apogee'' (0;29,5), ''at perigee'' (0;36,55), and ''at mean distance'' (0;32.32).<ref name=":0" /> This was partially done by reducing Ptolemy's circular geometric models to numerical tables in order to perform independent calculations to find the longitude of the planets.<ref name=":1" /> The longitude of the planets was defined as a function of the mean longitude and the anomaly. Rather than calculating every possible value, which would be difficult and labor-intensive, four functions of a single value were calculated for each planet and combined to calculate quite accurately the true longitude of each planet.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Abbud|first=Fuad|date=1962|title=The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Reduction of the Geometric Models to Numerical Tables|journal=The University of Chicago Press|volume=53|pages=492–499}}</ref>
Although his system was firmly ], he had eliminated the Ptolemaic ] and ], and the mathematical details of his system were identical to those in ]' '']''.<ref>The model Copernicus used in his earlier ''Commentariolus'' differs in minor detail from that of Ibn al-Shatir. V. Roberts and E. S. Kennedy, "The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir", ''Isis'', 50(1959):232-234.</ref> His lunar model was also no different from the lunar model used by Copernicus.<ref>] (1994), ''A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories During the Golden Age of Islam'', p. 236, ], ISBN 0814780237.</ref> This suggests that Ibn al-Shatir's model may have influenced Copernicus while constructing the ].<ref>{{cite journal
| last=Guessoum | first=N. | month=June | year=2008
| title=Copernicus and Ibn Al-Shatir: does the Copernican revolution have Islamic roots?
| journal=The Observatory | volume=128 | pages=231-239
| bibcode=2008Obs...128..231G
}}</ref> Though it remains uncertain how this may have happened, it is known that ] manuscripts containing the ] which Ibn al-Shatir employed had reached ] in the 15th century.<ref>] (1998). "Configuring the Universe: Aporetic, Problem Solving, and Kinematic Modeling as Themes of Arabic Astronomy", ''Perspectives on Science'' '''6''' (3), p. 288-330.</ref> It is also known that Copernicus' ]s for his heliocentric model, including the ] of points, was nearly identical to the diagrams and markings used by Ibn al-Shatir for his geocentric model, making it very likely that Copernicus may have been aware of Ibn al-Shatir's work.<ref>] (2007), and </ref>


To calculate the true longitude of the moon, Ibn al-Shatir assigned two variables, η, which represented the Moon's mean elongation from the Sun, and γ, which represented its mean anomaly. To any pair of these values was a corresponding e, or equation which was added to the mean longitude to calculate the true longitude. Ibn al-Shatir used the same mathematical scheme when finding the true longitudes of the planets, except for the planets the variables became α, the mean longitude measured from apogee (or the mean center) and γ which was the mean anomaly as for the moon. A correcting function c3' was tabulated and added to the mean anomaly γ to determine the true anomaly γ'.<ref name=":2" /> As shown in Shatir's model, it was later discovered that Shatir's lunar model had a very similar concept as Copernicus.<ref name=":3" /> Ibn al-Shatir never gave motivation towards his two epicycles to be adopted, so it was hard to tell the difference between his model and the Ptolemaic model.
Y. M. Faruqi writes:<ref>Y. M. Faruqi (2006). "Contributions of Islamic scholars to the scientific enterprise", ''International Education Journal'' '''7''' (4), p. 395-396.</ref>


===Possible influence on Nicolaus Copernicus===
{{quote|"Ibn al-Shatir’s theory of lunar motion was very similar to that attributed to Copernicus some 150 years later".}}
Although Ibn al-Shatir's system was firmly geocentric (he had eliminated the Ptolemaic eccentrics), the mathematical details of his system were identical to those in ] '']''.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last=Berggren|first=J|date=1999|title=Sundials in medieval Islamic science and civilization|url=http://people.math.sfu.ca/~berggren/Attachments/Dials_Publications/Islamic_sundials.pdf|journal=Coordinates}}</ref> Furthermore, the exact replacement of the ] by two ] used by Copernicus in the '']'' paralleled the work of Ibn al-Shatir one century earlier.<ref name=Swerdlow>{{Cite journal| issn = 0003-049X| volume = 117| issue = 6| page = 424| last = Swerdlow| first = Noel M.| title = The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus's Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary| journal = Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society| date = 1973-12-31| jstor = 986461| bibcode = 1973PAPhS.117..423S}}</ref> Ibn al-Shatir's lunar and Mercury models are also identical to those of Copernicus.<ref name=":9">{{cite encyclopedia | editor = Thomas Hockey | display-editors = etal | last = King | first = David A. | title=Ibn al-Shāṭir: ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Ibrāhīm | encyclopedia = The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers | publisher = Springer | date = 2007 | location = New York | pages = 569–70 | url=http://islamsci.mcgill.ca/RASI/BEA/Ibn_al-Shatir_BEA.htm | isbn=978-0-387-31022-0}} ()</ref> Copernicus also translated Ptolemy's geometric models to longitudinal tables in the same way Ibn al Shatir did when constructing his solar model.<ref name=":1" /> This has led some scholars to argue that Copernicus must have had access to some yet to be identified work on the ideas of Ibn al-Shatir.<ref name="google42">Linton ]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-03-26|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|reason= }}, pp., , Saliba ].</ref> It is unknown whether Copernicus read Ibn al-Shatir and the argument is still debated. The differences between the two can be seen in their works. Copernicus followed a heliocentric model (planets orbit the Sun) while Ibn al-Shatir followed the geocentric model (as mentioned earlier). Also Copernicus followed the ] while Ibn al-Shatir followed the ] traditions.<ref name=":9" /> A Byzantine manuscript containing a solar model diagram with a second epicycle, was discovered to have been in Italy at the time of Copernicus. The presence of this eastern manuscript containing the ideas of Islamic scholars in Italy provides potential evidence of transmission of astronomical theories from the East to Western Europe.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roberts|first=Victor|date=1966|title=The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Latitudes of the Planets|journal=The University of Chicago|volume=57|pages=208–219}}</ref>


==Instruments==
{{quote|"Whereas Ibn al-Shatir’s concept of planetary motion was conceived in order to play an important role in an earth-centred planetary model, Copernicus used the same concept of motion to present his sun-centred planetary model. Thus the development of alternative models took place that permitted an empirical testing of the models."}}
The idea of using hours of equal time length throughout the year was the innovation of Ibn al-Shatir in 1371, based on earlier developments in ] by ]. Before the Islamicate scholar created the improved sundial, he had to understand the sundial created by his predecessors. The Greek had sundials too, but they had nodus-based with straight hour lines which meant that the hours in the day would be unequal (temporary hours) depending on the season. Each day was split into twelve equal segments which meant that the hours would have been shorter in the winter and longer in the summer due to the activity of the sun.<ref name=":5" /> Ibn al-Shatir was aware that "using a ] that is parallel to the Earth's axis will produce sundials whose hour lines indicate equal hours on any day of the year." His sundial is the oldest polar-axis sundial still in existence. The concept later appeared in Western sundials from at least 1446.<ref name=":5">{{cite web|title=History of the sundial|url=http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.353|publisher=]|access-date=2008-07-02|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071010044606/http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.353|archive-date=2007-10-10}}</ref>{{sfn|Jones|2005}}


Ibn al-Shatir also invented a ]keeping device called "Sandūq al‐Yawāqīt li maʿrifat al-Mawāqīt" (صندوق اليواقيت لمعرفة المواقيت jewel box), which incorporates both a universal ] and a magnetic compass. He invented it for the purpose of finding the times of ].<ref name="King-1983">{{Harv|King|1983|pp=547–8}}</ref> The "Sandūq al‐Yawāqīt li maʿrifat al-Mawāqīt" had a moveable hole in it which allowed the user to find the hour angle of the sun. If this angle was suitable with the horizon, then the user could use it as a polar sundial.<ref name=":6" /> This device is preserved in the museum of Aleppo (largest museum in the city of Aleppo, Syria).<ref name=":6" /> He also created a sundial which was placed on top of the Madhanat al-Arus (The Minaret of the Bride) in the Umayyad Mosque.<ref name=":4" /> The sundial was created on a slab of marble which was approximately 2 meters by 1 meter. The sundial being engraved on the marble was so that Ibn al-Shatir could read the time of the day in equinoctial (equal times) hours for the prayer times.<ref name=":4" /> This sundial was later removed in the eighteenth century and a replica was put in its place. The original sundial was placed in the Damascus archeology museum.<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=Rezvani|first=Pouyan|title=The Role of ʿIlm al-Mīqāt in the Progress of Making Sundials in the Islamic Civilization|url=https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/32985536/The_Role_of_Ilm_al-Miqat_in_the_Progress_of_Making_Sundials_in_the_Islamic_Civilization-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1639883966&Signature=Wmi8q41dr0Gf4oyZhRpUuKPiXmjrSr131Hh4kBhnaB-1DtDh9hLoHDwKPxuRw6zr~~rIAAQ7sIp---udvQEaB0PlygtP9tfZQWz05S9WAED4PNXv2QvHVobkYHjB3Mrgpt7LlJ-KEDX0vbkTnamjO5fdSpXoQa4b98Dsn-Fm7gT~DYwxlVkRzmLSrkVmh2wvjuWXiTxdij352XtfG4Tq0Jr3ejwZYqeNcJjFELqdk0VZKywOZmVVxHBs3628BQ5OGP70N38BXYLvXnUZa4Qz41Ga0W9rV87pV9tYNfkOEeodawAnrSyt1x00eSZmvy2hSWUC5e0Exonm2AsCSiWz3w__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA|journal=Academia|access-date=2021-12-19|archive-date=2021-12-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211219022423/https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/32985536/The_Role_of_Ilm_al-Miqat_in_the_Progress_of_Making_Sundials_in_the_Islamic_Civilization-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1639883966&Signature=Wmi8q41dr0Gf4oyZhRpUuKPiXmjrSr131Hh4kBhnaB-1DtDh9hLoHDwKPxuRw6zr~~rIAAQ7sIp---udvQEaB0PlygtP9tfZQWz05S9WAED4PNXv2QvHVobkYHjB3Mrgpt7LlJ-KEDX0vbkTnamjO5fdSpXoQa4b98Dsn-Fm7gT~DYwxlVkRzmLSrkVmh2wvjuWXiTxdij352XtfG4Tq0Jr3ejwZYqeNcJjFELqdk0VZKywOZmVVxHBs3628BQ5OGP70N38BXYLvXnUZa4Qz41Ga0W9rV87pV9tYNfkOEeodawAnrSyt1x00eSZmvy2hSWUC5e0Exonm2AsCSiWz3w__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA|url-status=dead}}</ref> He also created another sundial but in smaller dimensions (12&nbsp;cm x 12&nbsp;cm × 3&nbsp;cm) to find out the prayer times of midday and the afternoon. This sundial was able to tell the local meridian and the direction of ] (located in Saudi Arabia).<ref name=":6"/>
==Engineering==
===Astrolabic clock===
Ibn al-Shatir invented the first ] ] in the early 14th century.<ref name=King>David A. King (1983), "The Astronomy of the Mamluks", '']'' '''74''' (4), pp. 531-555 </ref>


Other notable instruments made by him include a reversed ] and an astrolabic clock.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|first=David A.|last=King|year=1983|title=The Astronomy of the Mamluks|journal=] |volume=74 |issue=4|pages=531–555 |doi=10.1086/353360|s2cid=144315162}}</ref> The astrolabe that he created was called the ''al‐āla al‐jāmiʿa'' (الآلة الجامعة the universal instrument). This astrolabe was created by Ibn al-Shatir when he wrote on the ordinary planispheric astrolabe and when he wrote on the two most common quadrants (the astrolabic and the trigonometric varieties).<ref name=":8" /> These two common quadrants were modified versions of the sine quadrant. He also created a set of tables that had values of spherical astronomical functions for prayer times. The tables displayed the times for the morning, afternoon, and evening prayers. The latitude that was used to create the table was 34° (which was correspondent to a location north of Damascus).<ref name=":7" />
===Polar-axis sundial===
Ibn al-Shatir constructed a magnificent ] for the ] of the ] in ].<ref name=King/> As the ancient ]s were nodus-based with straight hour-lines, they indicated unequal hours&mdash;also called temporary hours&mdash;that varied with the seasons. Every day was divided into twelve equal segments; thus, hours were shorter in winter and longer in summer. The idea of using hours of equal length throughout the year was the innovation of Abu'l-Hasan Ibn al-Shatir in 1371, based on earlier developments in ] by ] (Albategni). He was aware that "using a ] that is parallel to the Earth's axis will produce sundials whose hour lines indicate equal hours on any day of the year." His sundial is the oldest polar-axis sundial still in existence. The concept later appeared in Western sundials from at least 1446.<ref>{{cite web|title=History of the sundial|url=http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.353|publisher=]|accessdate=2008-07-02}}</ref><ref>{{citation|title=The Sundial And Geometry|first=Lawrence|last=Jones|journal=North American Sundial Society|volume=12|issue=4|date=December 2005}}</ref>

===Compass dial===
The ], a ]keeping device incorporating both a universal ] and a magnetic ], was invented by Ibn al-Shatir in the early 14th century.<ref>David A. King (1983). "The Astronomy of the Mamluks", ]'' '''74''' (4), p. 531-555 .</ref>

===Compendium===
The ], a multi-purpose astronomical instrument, was first constructed by Ibn al-Shatir. His compendium featured an ] and polar ] among other things. These compendia later became popular in ] Europe.<ref name=King-Astronomy>{{citation|first=David A.|last=King|contribution=Astronomy and Islamic society|pages=163–8}}, in {{Harv|Rashed|Morelon|1996|pp=128-184}}</ref>

===Universal instrument===
Ibn al-Shatir described another astronomical instrument which he called the "universal instrument" in his ''Rays of light on operations with the universal instrument'' (''Al-Ashi'a al-lāmi'a fī 'l-'amal bi-'l-āla al jāmi'a''). A commentary on this work entitled ''Book of Ripe Fruits from Clusters of Universal Instrument'' (''Kitab al-thimār al-yāni'a ‘an qutāf al-āla al-jāmi'a'') was later written by the ] astronomer and engineer ], who employed the instrument at the ] from 1577-1580.<ref name=Ayduz>{{cite web|author=Dr. Salim Ayduz|title=Taqi al-Din Ibn Ma’ruf: A Bio-Bibliographical Essay|url=http://muslimheritage.com/topics/default.cfm?ArticleID=949|date=26 June 2008|accessdate=2008-07-04}})</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
*] * ]
*] * ]


==References== ==Notes==
{{reflist}} {{Reflist}}


==References== ==References==
* Fernini, Ilias. ''A Bibliography of Scholars in Medieval Islam''. Abu Dhabi (UAE) Cultural Foundation, 1998 * Fernini, Ilias. ''A Bibliography of Scholars in Medieval Islam''. Abu Dhabi (UAE) Cultural Foundation, 1998
* {{Cite journal |title=The Sundial And Geometry |first=Lawrence |last=Jones |journal=North American Sundial Society |volume=12 |issue=4 |date=December 2005}}
* Kennedy, Edward S. "Late Medieval Planetary Theory." ''Isis'' 57 (1966):365-378.
* ] (1966) "Late Medieval Planetary Theory." ''Isis'' 57:365–378.
* Kennedy, Edward S. and Ghanem, Imad. ''The Life and Work of Ibn al-Shatir, an Arab Astronomer of the Fourteenth Century''. Aleppo: History of Arabic Science Institute, University of Aleppo, 1976.
* Kennedy, Edward S. and Ghanem, Imad. (1976) ''The Life and Work of Ibn al-Shatir, an Arab Astronomer of the Fourteenth Century'', History of Arabic Science Institute, ].
* Roberts, Victor. "The Solar and Lunar Theory of Ibn ash-Shatir: A Pre-Copernican Copernican Model". ''Isis'', 48(1957):428-432.
* Linton, Chris. ''From Eudoxus to Einstein: A History of Mathematical Astronomy.'' Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, {{ISBN|978-0-521-82750-8}}.
* Roberts, Victor and Edward S. Kennedy. "The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir". ''Isis'', 50(1959):227-235.
* ]. "Theory and Observation in Islamic Astronomy: The Work of Ibn al-Shatir of Damascus". ''Journal for the History of Astronomy'', 18(1987):35-43. * Roberts, Victor. "The Solar and Lunar Theory of Ibn ash-Shatir: A Pre-Copernican Copernican Model". ''Isis'', 48(1957):428–432.
* Roberts, Victor and Edward S. Kennedy. "The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir". ''Isis'', 50(1959):227–235.
* Turner, Howard R. ''Science in Medieval Islam, an illustrated introduction''. University of Texas Press, Austin, 1995. ISBN 0-292-78149-0 (pb) ISBN 0-292-78147-4 (hc)
* ]. "Theory and Observation in Islamic Astronomy: The Work of Ibn al-Shatir of Damascus". ''Journal for the History of Astronomy'', 18(1987):35–43.
* Turner, Howard R. ''Science in Medieval Islam, an illustrated introduction''. University of Texas Press, Austin, 1995. {{ISBN|0-292-78149-0}} (pb) {{ISBN|0-292-78147-4}} (hc)
* {{Citation
|last=Saliba
|first=George
|author-link=George Saliba
|year=1994b
|title=A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories During the Golden Age of Islam
|publisher=]
|isbn=978-0-8147-8023-7
}}
* {{Citation | last=Saliba |first=George |title=Islamic reception of Greek astronomy |author-link=George Saliba |year=2009 |work=in ]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-03-26|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|reason= }} |volume=260 |pages=149–65 |doi=10.1017/S1743921311002237 |bibcode=2011IAUS..260..149S |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4815D5D2879A9719F1DA0DE098900586/S1743921311002237a.pdf/islamic_reception_of_greek_astronomy.pdf |doi-access=free }}

==Further reading==
* {{cite encyclopedia | editor = Thomas Hockey | display-editors = etal | last = King | first = David A. | title=Ibn al-Shāṭir: ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Ibrāhīm | encyclopedia = The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers | publisher = Springer | date = 2007 | location = New York | pages = 569–70 | url=http://islamsci.mcgill.ca/RASI/BEA/Ibn_al-Shatir_BEA.htm | isbn=978-0-387-31022-0}} ()


==External links== ==External links==
* by Howard R. Turner
*http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/phys/alshukri/PHYS215/Islamic%20astronomy.htm
*http://www.riifs.org/review_articles/review_v1no2_sliba.htm *
*http://www.angelfire.com/il/Fernini/ifscience.html
*http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~anoop/weblog/archives/000080.html
*http://www.bookrags.com/research/ala-al-din-abul-hasan-ali-ibn-ibrah-scit-021234/


{{Islamic astronomy}} {{Islamic astronomy}}
{{Islamic mathematics}} {{Islamic mathematics}}


{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Shatir}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Ibn Al-Shatir}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:05, 10 December 2024

Arab astronomer and clockmaker (1304–1375)
Ibn al-Shatir
Ibn al-Shatir's lunar model.
Born1304
Damascus, Mamluk Sultanate
Died1375 (aged 71)
OccupationAstronomer
Workskitab nihayat al-sul fi tashih al-usul

ʿAbu al-Ḥasan Alāʾ al‐Dīn bin Alī bin Ibrāhīm bin Muhammad bin al-Matam al-Ansari, known as Ibn al-Shatir or Ibn ash-Shatir (Arabic: ابن الشاطر; 1304–1375) was an Arab astronomer, mathematician and engineer. He worked as muwaqqit (موقت, timekeeper) in the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus and constructed a sundial for its minaret in 1371/72.

Biography

Ibn al-Shatir was born in Damascus, Mamluk Sultanate around the year 1304. His father died when he was six years old. His grandfather took him in which resulted in Ibn al-Shatir learning the craft of inlaying ivory. Ibn al-Shatir traveled to Cairo and Alexandria to study astronomy, where he fell in, inspired him. After completing his studies with Abu 'Ali al-Marrakushi, Ibn al-Shatir returned to his home in Damascus where he was then appointed muwaqqit (timekeeper) of the Umayyad Mosque. Part of his duties as muqaqqit involved keeping track of the times of the five daily prayers and when the month of Ramadan would begin and end. To accomplish this, he created a variety of astronomical instruments. He made several astronomical observations and calculations both for the purposes of the mosque, and to fuel his later research. These observations and calculations were organized in a series of astronomical tables. His first set of tables, which have been lost over time, allegedly combined his observations with those of Ptolemy, and contained entries on the Sun, Moon and Earth.

Astronomy

Ibn al-Shatir′s most important astronomical treatise was kitab nihayat al-sul fi tashih al-usul (نهاية السول في تصحيح الاصول "The Final Quest Concerning the Rectification of Principles"). In it he refined the Ptolemaic models of the Sun, Moon and planets. His model incorporated the Urdi lemma, and eliminated the need for an equant (a point on the opposite side of the center of the larger circle from the Earth) by introducing an extra epicycle (the Tusi-couple), departing from the Ptolemaic system in a way that was mathematically identical (but conceptually very different) to what Nicolaus Copernicus did in the 16th century. This new planetary model was published in his work the al-Zij al-jadid (الزيج الجديد The New Planetary Handbook.) Before the kitab nihayat al-sul fi tashih al-usul was made, there was a treatise that Ibn al-Shatir made which described the observations and procedures that lead to him creating his new planetary models.

Ibn al-Shatir's model for the appearances of Mercury, showing the multiplication of epicycles in a Ptolemaic enterprise

Drawing on the observation that the distance to the Moon did not change as drastically as required by Ptolemy's lunar model, Ibn al-Shatir produced a new lunar model that replaced Ptolemy's crank mechanism with a double epicycle model that computed a more accurate range of distances of the Moon from the Earth.

Solar Model

Ibn al-Shatir's Solar Model exemplifies his commitment towards accurate observational data, and its creation serves as a general improvement towards the Ptolemaic model. When observing the Ptolemaic solar model, it is clear that most of the observations are not accounted for, and cannot accommodate the observed variations of the apparent size of the solar diameter. Because the Ptolemaic system contains some faulty numerical values for its observations, the actual geocentric distance of the Sun had been greatly underestimated in its solar model. And with the problems that had arisen from the Ptolemaic models, there was an influx of need to create solutions that would resolve them. Ibn al-Shatir's model aimed to do just that, creating a new eccentricity for the solar model. And with his numerous observations, Ibn al-Shatir was able to generate a new maximum solar equation (2;2,6°), which he found to have occurred at the mean longitude λ 97° or 263° from the apogee. As the method was deciphered through geometric ways, it was easy to identify that 7;7 and 2;7 were the radii of the epicycles. In addition, his final results for apparent size of the solar diameter were concluded to be at apogee (0;29,5), at perigee (0;36,55), and at mean distance (0;32.32). This was partially done by reducing Ptolemy's circular geometric models to numerical tables in order to perform independent calculations to find the longitude of the planets. The longitude of the planets was defined as a function of the mean longitude and the anomaly. Rather than calculating every possible value, which would be difficult and labor-intensive, four functions of a single value were calculated for each planet and combined to calculate quite accurately the true longitude of each planet.

To calculate the true longitude of the moon, Ibn al-Shatir assigned two variables, η, which represented the Moon's mean elongation from the Sun, and γ, which represented its mean anomaly. To any pair of these values was a corresponding e, or equation which was added to the mean longitude to calculate the true longitude. Ibn al-Shatir used the same mathematical scheme when finding the true longitudes of the planets, except for the planets the variables became α, the mean longitude measured from apogee (or the mean center) and γ which was the mean anomaly as for the moon. A correcting function c3' was tabulated and added to the mean anomaly γ to determine the true anomaly γ'. As shown in Shatir's model, it was later discovered that Shatir's lunar model had a very similar concept as Copernicus. Ibn al-Shatir never gave motivation towards his two epicycles to be adopted, so it was hard to tell the difference between his model and the Ptolemaic model.

Possible influence on Nicolaus Copernicus

Although Ibn al-Shatir's system was firmly geocentric (he had eliminated the Ptolemaic eccentrics), the mathematical details of his system were identical to those in Copernicus's De revolutionibus. Furthermore, the exact replacement of the equant by two epicycles used by Copernicus in the Commentariolus paralleled the work of Ibn al-Shatir one century earlier. Ibn al-Shatir's lunar and Mercury models are also identical to those of Copernicus. Copernicus also translated Ptolemy's geometric models to longitudinal tables in the same way Ibn al Shatir did when constructing his solar model. This has led some scholars to argue that Copernicus must have had access to some yet to be identified work on the ideas of Ibn al-Shatir. It is unknown whether Copernicus read Ibn al-Shatir and the argument is still debated. The differences between the two can be seen in their works. Copernicus followed a heliocentric model (planets orbit the Sun) while Ibn al-Shatir followed the geocentric model (as mentioned earlier). Also Copernicus followed the inductive reasoning while Ibn al-Shatir followed the Zij traditions. A Byzantine manuscript containing a solar model diagram with a second epicycle, was discovered to have been in Italy at the time of Copernicus. The presence of this eastern manuscript containing the ideas of Islamic scholars in Italy provides potential evidence of transmission of astronomical theories from the East to Western Europe.

Instruments

The idea of using hours of equal time length throughout the year was the innovation of Ibn al-Shatir in 1371, based on earlier developments in trigonometry by al-Battānī. Before the Islamicate scholar created the improved sundial, he had to understand the sundial created by his predecessors. The Greek had sundials too, but they had nodus-based with straight hour lines which meant that the hours in the day would be unequal (temporary hours) depending on the season. Each day was split into twelve equal segments which meant that the hours would have been shorter in the winter and longer in the summer due to the activity of the sun. Ibn al-Shatir was aware that "using a gnomon that is parallel to the Earth's axis will produce sundials whose hour lines indicate equal hours on any day of the year." His sundial is the oldest polar-axis sundial still in existence. The concept later appeared in Western sundials from at least 1446.

Ibn al-Shatir also invented a timekeeping device called "Sandūq al‐Yawāqīt li maʿrifat al-Mawāqīt" (صندوق اليواقيت لمعرفة المواقيت jewel box), which incorporates both a universal sundial and a magnetic compass. He invented it for the purpose of finding the times of prayers. The "Sandūq al‐Yawāqīt li maʿrifat al-Mawāqīt" had a moveable hole in it which allowed the user to find the hour angle of the sun. If this angle was suitable with the horizon, then the user could use it as a polar sundial. This device is preserved in the museum of Aleppo (largest museum in the city of Aleppo, Syria). He also created a sundial which was placed on top of the Madhanat al-Arus (The Minaret of the Bride) in the Umayyad Mosque. The sundial was created on a slab of marble which was approximately 2 meters by 1 meter. The sundial being engraved on the marble was so that Ibn al-Shatir could read the time of the day in equinoctial (equal times) hours for the prayer times. This sundial was later removed in the eighteenth century and a replica was put in its place. The original sundial was placed in the Damascus archeology museum. He also created another sundial but in smaller dimensions (12 cm x 12 cm × 3 cm) to find out the prayer times of midday and the afternoon. This sundial was able to tell the local meridian and the direction of Mecca (located in Saudi Arabia).

Other notable instruments made by him include a reversed astrolabe and an astrolabic clock. The astrolabe that he created was called the al‐āla al‐jāmiʿa (الآلة الجامعة the universal instrument). This astrolabe was created by Ibn al-Shatir when he wrote on the ordinary planispheric astrolabe and when he wrote on the two most common quadrants (the astrolabic and the trigonometric varieties). These two common quadrants were modified versions of the sine quadrant. He also created a set of tables that had values of spherical astronomical functions for prayer times. The tables displayed the times for the morning, afternoon, and evening prayers. The latitude that was used to create the table was 34° (which was correspondent to a location north of Damascus).

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Roberts, Victor (1966). "The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Latitudes of the Planets". Isis. 57 (2): 208–219. doi:10.1086/350114. JSTOR 227960. S2CID 143576999.
  2. ^ Freely, John (2015). Light from the East: how the Science of Medieval Islam helped to shape the Western World. I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1784531386.
  3. ^ Freely, John. (2010). Light from the East : How the Science of Medieval Islam helped to shape the Western World. London: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-0-85772-037-5. OCLC 772844807.
  4. ^ Abbud, Fuad (December 1962). "The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Reduction of the Geometric Models to Numerical Tables". Isis. 53 (4): 492–499. doi:10.1086/349635. ISSN 0021-1753. S2CID 121312064.
  5. Neugebauer (1975), volume 3 at pages 1108–1109.
  6. Saliba, George (1987). "Theory and Observation in Islamic Astronomy: The Work of IBN AL-SHĀTIR of Damascus". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 18: 35–43. doi:10.1177/002182868701800102. S2CID 115311028.
  7. ^ Roberts, Victor (1957). "The Solar and Lunar Theory of Ibn ash-Shāṭir: A Pre-Copernican Copernican Model". Isis. 48 (4): 428–432. doi:10.1086/348609. ISSN 0021-1753. JSTOR 227515. S2CID 120033970.
  8. Roberts, Victor. "The Solar and Lunar Theory of Ibn ash-Shāṭir: A Pre-Copernican Copernican Model" (PDF). Chicago Journals. 48: 428–432.
  9. ^ Abbud, Fuad (1962). "The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Reduction of the Geometric Models to Numerical Tables". The University of Chicago Press. 53: 492–499.
  10. ^ Berggren, J (1999). "Sundials in medieval Islamic science and civilization" (PDF). Coordinates.
  11. Swerdlow, Noel M. (1973-12-31). "The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus's Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 117 (6): 424. Bibcode:1973PAPhS.117..423S. ISSN 0003-049X. JSTOR 986461.
  12. ^ King, David A. (2007). "Ibn al-Shāṭir: ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Ibrāhīm". In Thomas Hockey; et al. (eds.). The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers. New York: Springer. pp. 569–70. ISBN 978-0-387-31022-0. (PDF version)
  13. Linton (2004, pp.124, 137–38), Saliba (2009, pp.160–65).
  14. Roberts, Victor (1966). "The Planetary Theory of Ibn al-Shatir: Latitudes of the Planets". The University of Chicago. 57: 208–219.
  15. ^ "History of the sundial". National Maritime Museum. Archived from the original on 2007-10-10. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
  16. Jones 2005.
  17. (King 1983, pp. 547–8)
  18. ^ Rezvani, Pouyan. "The Role of ʿIlm al-Mīqāt in the Progress of Making Sundials in the Islamic Civilization" (PDF). Academia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-12-19. Retrieved 2021-12-19.
  19. ^ King, David A. (1983). "The Astronomy of the Mamluks". Isis. 74 (4): 531–555 . doi:10.1086/353360. S2CID 144315162.

References

Further reading

External links

Astronomy in the medieval Islamic world
Astronomers
  • by century
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
Topics
Works
Zij
Instruments
Concepts
Institutions
Influences
Influenced
Mathematics in the medieval Islamic world
Mathematicians
9th century
10th century
11th century
12th century
13th century
14th century
15th century
16th century
Mathematical
works
Concepts
Centers
Influences
Influenced
Related
Categories: