Revision as of 22:12, 7 April 2010 editYoenit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,750 edits →Question about references← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:30, 28 February 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Church/Archive 8) (botTag: Manual revert | ||
(588 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=22 January 2019}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 8 | ||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(48h) | ||
|archive = User talk: |
|archive = User talk:Church/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:SuggestBot/config | |||
|frequency = twice a month}} | |||
{{Archive box|]: April - May 2009<br />]: June 2009<br />]: June - October 2009| | {{Archive box|]: April - May 2009<br />]: June 2009<br />]: June - October 2009<br /> ]:October 2009-April 2010| | ||
}}. | }}. | ||
{| | {| | ||
Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
|{{User wikipedia/No personal attacks}} | |{{User wikipedia/No personal attacks}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{FilemoverTalkpageNotice}} | |||
== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 == | |||
== RfA == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20191006}} | |||
Hey, it's a little on the TL;DR side, but I hope you take a look at my comment in your RfA. I'm sorry I had to put it in the neutral section. Don't kick yourself ''too'' hard over that would-be-G10. Anyway, you've got a lot of good advice there from many editors I for one hold in very high esteem. I hope you use it to improve yourself as an editor and do feel free to drop a note on my talk page or send me an email if you want to chat! Best, ] | ] 18:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=916242202 --> | |||
::I've read all of my suppots, opposes, and neutrals multiple times and do plan to take their advice in mind and try once more once I'm ready. Thank you for your imput regards,--''''']''''' ] 22:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Good. As I said there, you'll make a great admin one day and I might even be persuaded to nominate you in a few months. RfA is a hell hole, but failing one isn't always a bad thing. My own failed in December but I got useful feedback from it. Let me know when you;re feeling masochistic again! Best, ] | ] 09:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
*Hey, I closed your RfA for you. I was passing by and saw your request. Sorry it wasn't too pleasant for you, but bear in mind what I said above. Btw, I cocked up the closing, but Fastily fixed it for me! You're welcome to drop me a line if you need anything or email me if you want to vent (RfA isn't nice- I've been there myself). Other than that, happy editing and best of luck next time, my friend. ] | ] 01:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Takes more then a failed attempt to get me down, Thanks for closing it! I found the whole process to be entertaining (People opposed me on an age I never disclosed :/), as well as informative. I'm now going into Admin coaching with Fastily myself, so we'll see what happens. Best of luck, --''''']''''' ] 01:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::I couldn't think of a better admin to coach you and I'm ''certain'' someone will be able to say that about you one day. As for your age, as I said there, it's the third stupidest rationale I've heard in my ~13 months on here (the first is the classic "too many administrators currently" and the second is "it's a self nom")! If you distinguish yourself in your editing, people will have nothing to go on but the maturity of your contributions. Anyway, you're welcome to get in touch any time, but otherwise, drop me a line in ~4 months and, if Fastily can't or won't, I'll give some serious thought to nominating you! Best, ] | ] 01:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019 == | |||
== Re:Admin Coaching == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200105}} | |||
{{Tb|Fastily|Admin Coaching}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=930444237 --> | |||
-''']'''<sup><small>]</small></sup></span> 01:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020 == | |||
== Thanks for trying == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200405}} | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=946217842 --> | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022 == | |||
'''Hello Skater''', Dlohcierekim has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the ] by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> | |||
</div><!-- Template:Smile --> | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
:Hi Skater. I would like to second Dlohcierekim's 'thanks for trying'. Judging from your nomination statement, you've got admin material and please do not get discourage by the opposes and neutral. I would have love to support you if not for the automated edits thingy. I honestly believe that you'll make a great admin one day. :) It's great that you've entered admin coaching. Wishing you all the best, ]] 03:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
::Thanks both of you for your kind words,support,and advice hopefully I'll see you all again in the near future.--''''']''''' ] 03:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The ] finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the ]. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section. | |||
'''Awards''': Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to {{Noping|MPGuy2824}}), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to {{no ping|John B123}} for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the ]. Check out the new ] also. | |||
== Fair use rationale for File:Shadow Company- Left For Dead.jpg == | |||
'''Software news''': {{Noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{Noping|MPGuy2824}} have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently ]. The ] has also been improved. | |||
] | |||
'''Suggestions''': | |||
*There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed". | |||
*Reminder: ''an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more.'' (from the ]) | |||
*Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue. | |||
*This ] puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar. | |||
'''Backlog''':] Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the ] to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate! | |||
] | |||
{{-}} | |||
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
;Reminders | |||
*Newsletter feedback - please take this ] about the newsletter. | |||
*If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the , where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers. | |||
*Please add ] to your watchlist. | |||
*If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at ]. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1114894896 --> | |||
== New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023 == | |||
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ''']'''<sup><small>]</small></sup></span> 23:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:We'll talk about how to fix this. Don't worry ;) -''']'''<sup><small>]</small></sup></span> 23:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
== ] nomination of ] == | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|} | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
;Backlog | |||
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to {{noping|WaddlesJP13}} who led with 2084 points. See ] for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day. | |||
;2022 Awards | |||
] | |||
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Rosguill}} led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the ] and the ]. Congratulations everyone! | |||
'''Minimum deletion time''': The previous ] guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and ]). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the ] are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 23:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
'''New draftify script''': In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly ]. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your ] or vector.js file from <code>User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js</code> to <code>User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js</code>''' | |||
== The ] Newsletter (Q1 2010) == | |||
'''Redirects''': Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see ], ], and spend some time at ]. | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20100407}} | |||
::*<small>Newsletter delivery by ] 17:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)</small> | |||
'''Discussions with the WMF''' The ] signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted ] in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as {{noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{noping|MPGuy2824}} have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also ] with the NPP coordinators to discuss ] that new users see. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
;Reminders | |||
*Newsletter feedback - please take this ] about the newsletter. | |||
*There is live chat with patrollers on the . | |||
*Please add ] to your watchlist. | |||
*If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at ]. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
</div><!-- Drafted by User:MB, Reviewed by Novem Linguae, Kudpung --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1130464022 --> | |||
== New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers --> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|} | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
'''Backlog''' | |||
'''Redirect drive''': In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with '''23851''' reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to '''0''' (momentarily). Congratulations to {{Noping|Hey man im josh}} who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by {{noping|Meena}} and {{noping|Greyzxq}} with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See ] for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day. | |||
== Question about references == | |||
'''Redirect autopatrol''': All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them ]. | |||
Hi, Thanks for dropping by on my talk page. I do have a question for you actually. I am trying to use the same footnote multiple times, but I can't get it to work. Do you know what I am doing wrong? | |||
'''WMF work on PageTriage''': The ], consisting of {{noping|Samwalton9 (WMF)|label1=Sam|JSherman (WMF)|label2=Jason|SCardenas (WMF)|label3=Susana}}, and also some patches from {{noping|Jon (WMF)|label1=Jon}}, has been hard at work ]. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in ] where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of ], to help find bugs. We will post more details at ] when we are ready for beta testers. | |||
The citation in question: | |||
<ref name=spanamwar>{{Citation|url=http://www.spanamwar.com/Mainemo1.htm|title=What Destroyed the USS MAINE - An opinion|author=Edward P. McMorrow|publisher=spanamwar.com|accessdate=April 7, 2010}}</ref> | |||
'''Articles for Creation (AFC)''': All new page reviewers are now '''automatically approved''' for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at ] like was required previously). To install the ], visit ], visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit ], and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script. | |||
and I am trying to call it back by | |||
<ref name=spanamwar\></ref> | |||
You can review the AFC workflow at ]. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that ], so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest. | |||
But the preview gives a warning: Citations with no name can't be empty. | |||
'''Pro tip''': Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own ]? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is ] 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums). | |||
Also, anyway to save your work in progress without submitting it? I made some changes to the article, but I am only half done and submitting it now would just look weird. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
Thanks for any response! ] (]) 22:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
'''Reminders''' | |||
*Newsletter feedback - please take this ] about the newsletter. | |||
*There is live chat with patrollers on the and {{IRC|wikimedia-npp}} on IRC. | |||
*Please add ] to your watchlist. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Drafted by Novem Linguae, MPGuy2824 and Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 --> |
Latest revision as of 08:30, 28 February 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Church has not edited Misplaced Pages since 22 January 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives |
Archive 1: April - May 2009 |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
.
|
|
|
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello Church,
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
Suggestions:
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello Church,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello Church,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.