| Revision as of 22:30, 17 January 2006 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits rm link to rant in user talk space again. If you want community comment, create an RFC. Stop being distruptive.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022 edit undoDwaipayanc (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,440 editsm Reverted edits by 5.245.241.17 (talk) to last version by Ed6767Tag: Rollback | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|historical document}} | |||
| {{shortcut|] or ]}} | |||
| {{selfref|WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for ] (formerly WP:RFCU) or for ] (])}} | |||
| == Comment about individual users == | |||
| {{historical|type=woundup|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of ].'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.|brief=yes}} | |||
| This section is for discussing specific users who have allegedly violated ]. In order to request comment about a user, please follow the instructions to create a subpage in the appropriate section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the ] policy, belong in the '''Article content disputes''' section above. | |||
| {{info|Prior to ] at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. | |||
| ⚫ | Old RfC/Us can be found in ]. | ||
| }} | |||
| ===Deleting uncertified user RfCs=== | |||
| Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements after 48 hours from creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See ] for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained. | |||
| ===Archives=== | |||
| ⚫ | Old |
||
| === General user conduct === | |||
| Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using ] as a template, and then list it as follows: | |||
| *] – {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> | |||
| '''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold'''<br/> | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold'''<br/> | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| *]: Multiple violations of various policies and guidelines (], ], ], ], ], ]). ]<font color="#008000">]</font>]] 22:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Refuses to abide by long-standing rules of current-events pages at ]. -- 03:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: revert warring against consensus at ] and ], personal attacks. 19:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC). | |||
| *] – has made anti-gay statements as well as anti-Jewish and anti-Russian ones. Refuses to apologise. ]] ''']''' ] 22:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Constantly revert wars without discussing changes on talk. ] 17:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Using wikipedia as a blog to air dissatifaction with a company. ] 19:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Spamming, incivility, refusal to accept consensus, 3rr, and more on ] --] <sup>]</sup> 04:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Conducting a hate campaign against users. | |||
| *] Repeatedly makes vicious personal attacks, makes unsubstantiated (and libelous) accusations of illegal behavior, vandalizes articles, and engages in edit wars. In short, a menace to the wikipedia community. | |||
| *] Gaming the system (]), assuming bad faith(]), incivil behavior (]), harassment (]), ignores consensus (]), and engages in personal attacks (]). | |||
| *] Repeated personal attacks, refusal to change course | |||
| *] Legal threats, incivil behavior, etc. relating to pushing unverified and potentially libelous allegations that ] committed sex crimes with his daughter, and then conspired with his company to cover it up. | |||
| *] - User is engaged in heated discussion on the ] page. User is currently under probation for China/Taiwan related infractions. Article ends up protected. | |||
| *] - User continues to post irrelevent entries into articles (He recently lised a Toledo, Ohio station under stations in Kansas City) and creates articles with little or no content. All articles in question pertain to radio stations in the Midwest. He's been warned and banned for vandalism in the past and probably needs some mentoring... and grammar lessons. 04:08, 16 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *]. User has violated numerous Misplaced Pages policies in an effort to keep legitimate criticism of veganism out of the ] and ] articles.19:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. ], ], ], ], ]. Besides the edit war, massive disruption of place names, thousands of moves and edits per day, immediate concern. Already tried 3rd party. ] 03:10, 14 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ] – strongly biased contributions that lead to strong personal discussions. ] ] 20:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ] – repeated POV deletion of perfectly relevant links to a site he doesn't like, coupled with accusations of "linkspamming."" Deceptive editing, accusations of "coordinating attacks" from third party sites, general harrassment of me, ]. ] 05:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ] – NPoV twisting, coordinating attacks on wikipedia PoV from third party site, link spamming fisheaters.com site written by Used2BAnonymous. 00:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. ], ], ], ], ]. Constantly argumentative, enjoys edit warring, refuses to take responsibility for statements made, combative and insulting. -- ] 00:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ] NPOV policy, hateful and libellous edits, ] and (minor) vandalism. --] 15:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. ], ], ], ], ]. Bad faith accusations of cabal, vested and entrenched interests of editors, and continues to attack people or make incivil comments, or disrupt articles in order to prove a point. Is very vehement and continues to antagonise other editors. -- ] 05:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. ]. Anti-Semitic remark. Will not retract. -- ] | ] 01:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. Personal attacks, POV pushing, refusal to cite sources. ] 21:24, 12 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. ], ], ], using multiple accounts and ip addresses on articles for deletion. ] 16:16, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. ], ], and ] violations. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ], incivility, ethnic slurs, constant accusations of bad faith, hysteria, anti-Russian conspiracies, paranoia and bad faith, as well as numerous ad hominem remarks and personal attacks. ]] 00:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ] - Creation of racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic articles in Mainspace, vandalism of userspace, using IPs to avoid a block. Also makes productive edits. ] 03:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ] - refusal to discuss reverts, violated 3RR twice, possibly evaded IP block. -- ] ] 16:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ] — The user known as Roylee has carried out a sustained introduction of fringe theories and original research into a large number of articles since December 2004. — ] ] 10:15, 2 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * ]. Incivility, personal attacks, and vandalism using multiple sockpuppet accounts. ]] 00:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| === Use of administrator privileges === | |||
| This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by ]. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the '''General user conduct''' section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template: | |||
| *] - Allegations: {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> | |||
| As with disputes over general user conduct, '''at least two people''' must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted. | |||
| '''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold''' | |||
| '''Pages where the target of the RFC has voluntarily waived the requirement of a two person threshold''' | |||
| *] - actions over block duration of {{user|Marsden}}. | |||
| '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold''' | |||
| *] - gauge of community opinion on admin accountability, RFA, power abuse, and deopping. | |||
| *] - regarding attitude towards new contributors unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages. ] (] | ] | ]) 20:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Abusive blocks made in violation of ] | |||
| *] (3rd RfC) - violations of blocking and deletion policies | |||
| *] - Admin Bachman has been abusing his privilege. ''(could someone summarise the dispute here? ten words of so?)'' | |||
| *] - Poor behavior in regards to content disputes, intimidates other users with admin status | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022
historical document WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations (formerly WP:RFCU) or for Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names (WP:RFC/NAME) | This page has been closed down by community consensus, and is retained only for historical reference. If you wish to restart discussion on the status of this page, seek community input at a forum such as the village pump. The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion. Other dispute resolution processes should be used for conduct issues. |
 | Prior to a discussion at the Village Pump that was closed in December 2014, requests for comment on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the dispute resolution process. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. Old RfC/Us can be found in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. |