Revision as of 19:15, 16 April 2010 editFellGleaming (talk | contribs)3,690 edits →Some advice← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:39, 21 December 2024 edit undoBozMo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,164 edits →Your resignation from adminship | ||
(799 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{administrator}} | {{administrator}} | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
== Barnstars == | == Barnstars == | ||
Thank you for the appreciation which I have moved off as they clutter the page. --] ] 18:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | Thank you for the appreciation which I have moved off as they clutter the page. --] ] 18:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)= | ||
== |
== tb == | ||
{{talkback|PamD}} | |||
Can you defend from an experienced editor on any good faith grounds? ] (]) 03:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== August 2013 == | |||
] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on . | |||
:Why would I want to defend it? --] ] 06:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
*<nowiki> through whom the pope exercised jurisdiction over a ] territory in England. </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>Interestingly, English-speaking ] America came</nowiki> | |||
*<nowiki>- later divided into Leeds and Middlesborough, Hexham - later changed to Hexham and Newcastle)=</nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki>. In the few cases where a Catholic diocese bears the same title as an Anglican one in the same</nowiki> | |||
Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 22:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Some baklava for you! == | |||
::Been looking around (briefly) to try to find obvious contradiction to it though and there is a certain accuracy. Not encyclopaedic though--] ] 07:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
::Right, not encyclopedic, blatantly POV, unsourced, and he did it twice. This is inexcusable for an experienced user, it's disruption, plain and simple. Of course, you do realize that edit triggered the uproar which you are blaming MN for, right? MN's response was misguided but it was not the root cause of the disruption. So if you are suggesting a long term ban for ''reacting'' to disruption, why are you not suggesting a similar ban for the original disruption? Especially given that the original disruption happened ''in article space'' where such edits really are potentially destructive, whereas the reactions occurred on talk pages and noticeboards -- why does the latter deserve a topic ban and the former gets (another) pass? | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | yummyyyy.!!!!!! ] (]) 18:41, 14 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== Request for comment == | |||
::And let's examine the reaction: (1) He posted a vandalism warning -- really, how far is that edit from vandalism? It's not vandalism by the letter, perhaps, but it is highly suspect in that someone as ''intelligent'' and ''experienced'' as WMC could have believed that was a good edit. So was it vandalism? No. Could a relatively inexperienced user misinterpret it as such? Perhaps. (2) After some bickering, WMC brought it to the probation talk page. MN responded. Lar asked for diffs. MN provided them. Then WMC accused him of making a "backdoor request" and repeatedly (falsely) asserted that Lar never asked for diffs. Even if you want to call that a backdoor request, I still don't believe a good faith reading of this sequence rises to the level of disruption of the original edit. (3) MN raises a COI/N request against WMC. This was ill-advised, but WMC ''was'' adding suspect edits to an article about a book which mentioned him. Is this not a potential COI issue? KC closed that request and accused MN of "forum shopping", which apparently relies on WMC's (false) interpretation of (2) being a "backdoor request". | |||
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by {{noping|Anna Frodesiak}}. Your comments ] is very much appreciated. Many thanks. ] through ] (]) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
::In addition to all this, MN had a formal ban from filing "compliants" against WMC, but I personally believed that this applied to the enforcement page only, and I think MN had the same belief when he went to COI/N (indeed, maybe the enforcement page only was Geni's intent in the first place, perhaps someone should ask them for clarification?). | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Jim Cartar@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/Category:Wikipedia_administrators --> | |||
== Proposed deletion of List of schools in Angola == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
::So, in summary, what we have here is a series of poor decisions by MN, but they were not the root cause of the dispute, and his reactions can all be reasonably classified as bad decisions made in good faith. But the root cause was a disruptive edit in article space (twice) for which I cannot conceive a good faith reading. | |||
:'''A list with only one valid blue link.''' | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
::In any case, if you are going to sanction, shouldn't both the original disruption and the reaction be sanctioned equally? Or, if you ''are'' going to sanction one side and not the other, what argument can be made that it should be only MN and not WMC, based on the analysis I've presented above? Implicit in this is, how can that original edit by WMC be read as a good faith action from someone as experienced and intelligent as WMC? ] (]) 14:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== Singer Reverts == | |||
Bozmo, I thank you for the warning, and I'm going to take your advice regardless. However, I would like a little clarification on what you consider 'edit warring'. In this case, an editor reverted a claim, saying the source was non:RS. I started a discussion on the talk page, pointing out the source was not a blog, and further, that it linked directly to the original Newsweek article. Editor reverted again, suggesting the original source should be Newsweek. So I complied. End of that issue. | |||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] 23:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Another editor then changed the well-sourced direct quote of Samuelson's title (contributing editor) to his own interpretation of that title. (freelance columnist). I made one reverts on this issue, both times explaining my reasoning on talk, then left it alone. | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
I don't see how I've come close to even violating 2RR here, much less the spirit of 3RR. Further, since this is a BLP, I thought the standard for scurrilous, fringe allegations was somewhat higher. The article is clearly a COATRACK, designed to discredit a scientist with a lengthy and varied career, by giving undue weight to one small aspect of that career, and the editors in question have a lengthy history of making similar edits to any and all biographies of similar individuals. ] (]) 13:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] 16:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
: and are easily two R. is a third ] (]) 16:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
:: Your reasoing is fallacious. The second edit was a direct response to your request to insert the original Newsweek source. The third edit dealt with another issue entirely; it wasn't reinserting the Samuelson article, but correcting his title to the official one given him at Newsweek. ] (]) 17:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
== Sorry! == | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 --> | |||
== Extended confirmed protection == | |||
My apologies for - I can only assume I clicked rollback by mistake, unless there's a bug somewhere. I'll keep an eye out and see if it happens again. — ] (]/]) 18:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{ivmbox|1=Hello, BozMo. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. | |||
== Ta == | |||
] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned ] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following ] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. | |||
] (]) 14:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
In July and August 2016, ] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: | |||
== ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 12 April 2010 == | |||
* '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort. | |||
* '''A bot will post a notification at ] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating ], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. | |||
Please review ] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' ]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}} | |||
<!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP--> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 --> | |||
== Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins == | |||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/{{#switch: 1 | |||
Hello, | |||
| 1 = 2010-04-12 | |||
| 2 = Volume 6, Issue 15 | |||
Please note that ] based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your ] in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the ] for additional information. '''Important''': Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the ]. ] (]) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| 3 = 2010-04-05 | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mike V@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mike_V/All_admins&oldid=749162175 --> | |||
| 4 = 2010-04-19 | |||
}}}} | |||
== A new user right for New Page Patrollers == | |||
Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}. | |||
A new user group, ], has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at ]. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. | |||
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available ] but very often a friendly custom message works best. | |||
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at ]. <small>''(Sent to all admins)''</small>.] (]) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=748418714 --> | |||
== ]: Voting now open! == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, BozMo. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/3&oldid=750539315 --> | |||
== ]: Voting now open! == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, BozMo. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/3&oldid=750539315 --> | |||
== Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 == | |||
] from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please ]. Your ] is welcomed. | |||
] '''Administrator changes''' | |||
:] ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] | |||
:] ] • ] • ] | |||
] '''Guideline and policy news''' | |||
:*A ] to workshop proposals to amend the ] at ] has been in process since late December 2016. | |||
:*] closed with no consensus for implementing ] with new criteria for use. | |||
:*Following ], an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators. | |||
] '''Technical news''' | |||
:*When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (]) | |||
:*Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an ] closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (]) | |||
:* The Foundation has ] a new ] to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017. | |||
] '''Arbitration''' | |||
:*The Arbitration Committee released ] to the Wikimedia Foundation's ]. | |||
] '''Obituaries''' | |||
:* ] (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. | |||
---- | |||
{{center|] • ] • ]}} | |||
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/First_issue&oldid=763126991 --> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 19:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, BozMo. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=813406680 --> | |||
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Misplaced Pages CD selection == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 20:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, BozMo. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=866997930 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2019 special circular == | |||
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> | |||
{| | |||
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| ] | |||
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators ] secure their accounts'''</span> | |||
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. | |||
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Misplaced Pages account and associated email | |||
* ] if your Misplaced Pages account password or email password is reused on another website, , or weak | |||
* ] for improved security | |||
|} | |||
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span> | |||
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> | |||
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;"> | |||
{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;" | |||
|{{null}} | |||
; Why have I received this message? | |||
: All administrators are receiving it. | |||
; What prompted you to send this message? | |||
: Recently, several Misplaced Pages admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were ]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh ] after losing control of their account. | |||
; What do I need to do? | |||
: Only to follow the instructions in this message. | |||
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). | |||
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). | |||
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. | |||
; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? | |||
: You can find out more about 2FA at ]. | |||
|}</div> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 00:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0033 --> | |||
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:20, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Clarification Request == | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> | |||
Bozmo, two years ago I was a new Misplaced Pages editor, with only a couple dozen edits under my belt. In April 2008, I reverted an edit of WMC's using the word vandalism. When he complained, I explained my reasoning on his talk page, again using the word. For that alone, you chose to give me a full edit block....within 15 minutes of my posting the statement. No warning from you or anyone else noninvolved, no attempt to explain -- just the block for "personal attacks". This, despite the fact that WMC had already been sanctioned for edit warring within that same article. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) == | |||
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. | |||
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are ] to "have strong passwords and ]." We have ] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, ] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. | |||
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, -] 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
== Nomination for deletion of Template:WPCD-Portal == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 14:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
] | |||
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. | |||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 18:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=926750232 --> | |||
== Administrators will no longer be ] == | |||
A ] Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove ] from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with ], choose to ] this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the ]. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=1058184441 --> | |||
== How we will see unregistered users == | |||
<section begin=content/> | |||
Hi! | |||
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki. | |||
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed. | |||
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin '''will still be able to access the IP'''. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on ] to help. | |||
If you have not seen it before, you can ]. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can ] to ]. | |||
We have ] this identity could work. '''We would appreciate your feedback''' on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can ]. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January. | |||
Thank you. | |||
/]<section end=content/> | |||
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Target_lists/Admins2022(2)&oldid=22532495 --> | |||
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
] | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
== New administrator activity requirement == | |||
{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new ] following a successful ]. | |||
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have: | |||
#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR | |||
#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period | |||
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work. | |||
}} | |||
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 --> | |||
== Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice == | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in '''gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them.''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 14:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
] | |||
Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 08:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 --> | |||
== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
==] has been nominated for deletion== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 23:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
I didn't question your decision then. I accepted it, believing that the rules would at least be applied consistently and honestly, to protect all users. Yet recently, where a editor -- an experienced one, at that -- brought a ground action against me, using far stronger language than I have ever considered, you chose to do nothing. This, despite his personal attacks not only on me, but two other editors who choose to support my position, going so far as to accuse one of sock puppetry in my defense. | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
And today, when an action in brought against WMC -- the person for whom you originally banned me for "personal attacks" -- you immediately move for "speedy close", before even anyone else can comment on the issue. This, despite the fact that WMC is already on probation for making personal attacks, and on a daily basis, breaches that probation. | |||
Hello, | |||
Can you please explain why some editors are allowed such wide latitude to make personal attacks and breach civility? Doesn't policy work better if its evenly applied? ]<sup>(])</sup> 14:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
:First, perhaps I am in the wrong. But let me explain a bit. (1) ref my block of you a couple of years ago, I do not block many people. I do not recall the block but form the logs you did not at the time look like a new editor (you had at least a hundred edits and you were fluently citing policies like ] which is not really a newbie trait). You got blocked by someone else within 48 hours and I think were being, well, a little bit of a hot-head. (2) ref WMC. WMC contributes considerably to overall Misplaced Pages content but has some behavioural issues. I do not personally think he has a POV issue (personally, I think Kim for example is much more consistently from a single viewpoint) but he does tend to be a bit rude about sceptics on BLPs. I have defended his behaviour several times in the past (and perhaps sometimes lived to regret it) partly because the terseness often goes together with an accuracy which I respect). I do not however admire his behaviour and I am not opposed to attempts to modify it. (3) On this occasion though, in a slightly patronising or snarky way admittedly, I think that WMC was actually trying to help MN to do a proper RFC. I kind of see the overall constructiveness of that side of things something we should encourage and it was a shame Mark took it the wrong way. Dragging behaviour through the probation on this occasion seems to me to be counterproductive this time. I do not systematically defend WMCs behaviour but this time even Cla88 and others were basically seeing MN as in the wrong. Fine for people to be in the wrong sometimes. Best if we can regard that as ok and move on. Sorry if I seem terribly biased about people. Over time I form opinions from the quality of people's edits. That does effect my judgements. --] ] 16:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
:: Thanks for the reply Bozmo. ''"You were...being, well, a little bit of a hot-head."'' Yes I was. But I was a new user, and not being ''nearly'' as much as a hothead as a far more experienced editor (Hipocrite) was...who you recommended receive no sanction whatsoever. Nnote that since then, today alone, that same editor has '''three times''' accused me of intentional disruption and bad faith. If I brought an action, would I receive fair protection from these attacks? I believe the result would be identical to the first instance -- no action whatosever. | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
:: Regarding WMC's edits, if you look at the BLPs of any skeptics, I think you may revise your opinion. I'm slowly working my way through them and, given I am usually working with several editors against me, the fact that the majority of my changes are sticking indicates real problems. WMC, however, applies his single revert a day to each article I touch, restoring highly prejudicial material. | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
:: Finally, I want to reiterate my earlier block is irrelevant, except in this context. When editors perceived to be on one side of an issue are continually allowed to flaunt one of the pillars of Misplaced Pages (civility), whereas editors perceived to be on the other side receive strident enforcement, ultimately that discourages open, honest debate over the content. Editors get discouraged, eventually leave, and the articles wind up expressing a particular POV, rather than balanced, neutral content. Eventually that reflects badly upon us all. ]<sup>(])</sup> 16:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
::: WP would undoubtedly be improved if better quality more sceptical editors on GW could be persuaded to stick around. I have defended MN quite a few times for that reason. FWIW I am also pretty sympathetic to your BLP complaints about Singer which I think seem well founded. But I don't have enough time to go through all the references to be sure yet, we will get there. I have also taken out quite a few inappropriate comments from BLPs over the last six months. What you say on HC may be true but I don't see many of his edits and my reaction to him being brought to the probation page is limited to the diffs provided. --] ] 17:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::You think i have quality? meep :-). Well I am slowly improving I believe, I hope your faith in me will eventually be justified ] (]) 17:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
== Proposed close == | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
Thanks for the proposed close - it is about time that someone did. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
However, I object to the terms. MN is on civility parole, he was repeatedly told by numerous respected editors that the vandalism accusations were unjustified, and he has refused to remove them (they are still present). Unless an accusation of vandalism is somehow considered trivial, I think you are in error. A very bare minimum would require MN to remove / strike the accusations, although I would consider that very weak indeed and tending to trivialise the process. He should be blocked for incivility. | |||
]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 09:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Already done that ] (]) 11:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
:: No, you mean you did it only after reading this, and in a graceless way with no apology. However, I note that when I was previously blocked for a comment change by LHVU, the fact that I'd undone the change well before the block was not considered any mitigation, and I'm sure you wouldn't want the enforecement to be inconsistent ] (]) 12:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
::Thanks Mark. @WMC I do not recall using the term trivial, but perhaps I did. I agree that Mark should not use terms like vandal as lightly as he does (and disruptive is only marginally better). However I am also given to reflection on the ] although your preferred analogy is Parliamentary language. You do tend to play roughly but by the rules (almost all the time) but you are dealing with people less expert in the rules than you, and they may not recognise that you are in fact being a bit constrained. You yourself are both experienced enough not to be personally wounded by misguided contributions and also pretty blunt in your own way. When you are dealing with people who cannot tell what is above and below the belt (according to local custom) I am inclined to say you cannot be precious and should help them to improve their conduct to which end blunt accusation may not be the most effective way. Excuse me now while I go and hug something and grow my hair long. Peace, man. --] ] 12:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::WMC, yes you are correct because you wrote ''A very bare minimum would require MN to remove / strike the accusations'' so i did it, sorry you feel it was graceless, i am unsure how to strike a comment gracefully. But i am sorry i called you a vandal, I have read up on ] and realize what you did was not vandalism. ] (]) 12:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
I see you've noted MN's retraction. I see you've failed to note ''However, I note that when I was previously blocked for a comment change by LHVU, the fact that I'd undone the change well before the block was not considered any mitigation''. Do you see how a reasonable person might consider this to be asymmetrical treatment? ] (]) 15:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
: If you're advocating an end to unequal treatment, William, I can only offer the advice, "be careful what you wish for; you may get it". ]<sup>(])</sup> 15:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:: At any rate I try to be consistent with my understanding of the rules and my previous admin behaviour. Expecting me to be consistent with precedent set by other admins is too much I am afraid. --] ] 15:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Take the survey ''''''. | |||
== Thanks... == | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
. I finally managed to mostly sort "lose" and "loose", and "to" and "too" ("working from 5 to 9 is too much, it may cause you to lose your mind so that you become a looser"), but some things remain elusive... --] (]) 13:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:Pleasure, and you are probably better at spelling than me anyway. As it happens I am crap at spelling (my 8 year old daughter out-spells me) especially on a keyboard but I know some other people don't like being corrected. I was what would now be called bilateral dyslexic at school, and still have problems with various words. Permanent versus Permenant for example: know a good rhyme for that one? --] ] 13:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
== Some advice == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
== Your resignation from adminship == | |||
] on this article, a new user keeps inserting false information and is removing other information to put his own website into the article. I have started a talk page discussion but i suspect it will be ignored. I have also posted on the users website forums about them accusing someone of plagerisim on their front page. Funnily enough they are now accusing me of mesh theft as well :) ] (]) 16:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Hello, I remember you from way back ]! I just wanted to make sure you knew that there are a couple of replies to your resignation message (including mine) ]. All the best. ] (]) 09:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Well, that account isn't going to succeed. Probably they will come back, add some actual contribution and try again. Meantime blatant SPA promoting a website, making no other contribution and multiple reverting is not a difficult decision: indef block. --] ] 17:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks mate, another question. If a guy is calling a well know modder a thief, is that a blp thing? In the modding community we take such things very seriously. But i am unsure how that would work here ] (]) 17:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::No problem. Probably I will get accusations of Third Reich membership all over my talk page by nightfall, but one comes to expect it. Anyway accusation of breaking the law would always be a serious matter in law and on Misplaced Pages. Other forms of "legal theft" are probably serious but less categorically so if supported by reliable sources. --] ] 17:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
You can block me for 5 minutes if you want to exercise your admin rights briefly before giving them up :-) ] (]) 10:33, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Request == | |||
::{{replyto|William M. Connolley}} lol, but Boz's resignation has ]. ] (]) 17:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Can you do something about this . I don't want the kid to get banned, and I've ignored 3 days of incessant accusations of lying and disruptive edits, but when someone starts following me around from page to page saying things like "don't be a dick", I think they need to be told to settle down. ]<sup>(])</sup> 19:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::That's kind of both of you but I am happy. ] ] 17:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:39, 21 December 2024
Messages
Please put messages at foot. I will delete them when I have read them. If you are replying to a message I left I don't mind where you reply but try to keep conversations together. If you are offering to help with the Schools DVD I would be very glad to hear from you. There is loads to do at present and we are working through the new subject index:
Art Business Studies Citizenship Countries Design and Technology Everyday life Geography History IT Language and literature Mathematics Music People Religion Science
The new selection of articles is about two weeks away. We are still hand checking version numbers (yawn) and still aiming for about 5500 articles to fit on a DVD. Just to update the selection of articles has just moved off wiki to allow a quicker automated run but it will come back. --BozMo talk 06:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Barnstars
Thank you for the appreciation which I have moved off as they clutter the page. --BozMo talk 18:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)=
tb
Hello, BozMo. You have new messages at PamD's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Catholic Church in England and Wales may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- through whom the pope exercised jurisdiction over a ] territory in England. (Interestingly, English-speaking ] America came
- - later divided into Leeds and Middlesborough, Hexham - later changed to Hexham and Newcastle)=]. In the few cases where a Catholic diocese bears the same title as an Anglican one in the same
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
yummyyyy.!!!!!! Shreya rai shetty (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of schools in Angola
The article List of schools in Angola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A list with only one valid blue link.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 23:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of List of schools in Angola for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of schools in Angola is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of schools in Angola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 16:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, BozMo. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi BozMo.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, BozMo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, BozMo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of schools in Jamaica for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of schools in Jamaica is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of schools in Jamaica (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ᛒᚨᛊᛖ (ᛏᚨᛚᚲ) 19:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, BozMo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Misplaced Pages CD selection
Template:Misplaced Pages CD selection has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jip Orlando (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, BozMo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
View additional information
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:20, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WPCD-Portal
Template:WPCD-Portal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Misplaced Pages CD Selection - Portals
A tag has been placed on Category:Misplaced Pages CD Selection - Portals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 18:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Newimpartial (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Misplaced Pages CD Selection has been nominated for deletion
Category:Misplaced Pages CD Selection has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Schierbecker (talk) 23:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Your resignation from adminship
Hello, I remember you from way back in 2009! I just wanted to make sure you knew that there are a couple of replies to your resignation message (including mine) at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. All the best. Graham87 (talk) 09:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
You can block me for 5 minutes if you want to exercise your admin rights briefly before giving them up :-) William M. Connolley (talk) 10:33, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- @William M. Connolley: lol, but Boz's resignation has already gone in to effect. Graham87 (talk) 17:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's kind of both of you but I am happy. BozMo talk 17:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- @William M. Connolley: lol, but Boz's resignation has already gone in to effect. Graham87 (talk) 17:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)