Revision as of 22:21, 18 January 2006 editHall Monitor (talk | contribs)20,413 edits →10 Christian biographies nominated for deletion: reply to Jason Gastrich← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:39, 13 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(486 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=February 2012}} | |||
<div style="padding:5px; margin:5px; border:2px solid #0F0; background-color:#CFC;"> | |||
<font size="5">'''''!'''''</font> '''Attention:''' I have nominated the following individual(s) for adminship, please review the following nomination(s) at your convenience: | |||
::* {{user|Yamla}} • ] | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="padding:5px; margin:5px; border:2px solid #F00; background-color:#FC8;"> | <div style="padding:5px; margin:5px; border:2px solid #F00; background-color:#FC8;"> | ||
Line 9: | Line 6: | ||
==Discussion archives== | ==Discussion archives== | ||
* ], ], ]. | |||
==Welcome back== | |||
welcome back, hope u had a good break ] ] 03:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Nice to see you back. – ]] 05:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Welcome back! Hope you're still here to see this. You don't seem to have made any edits since the 14th - '''] | ]''' 20:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Me too - good to see the familiar name popup in the block log. --] 22:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Just saw you reverting something on my watch list--great to see you again! ] ] 00:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Barnstar== | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Your service to Misplaced Pages is most deserving of this barnstar. Good job! ] 21:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
: Thank you for the barnstar, still warming back up. :-) ] 20:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Montclair High School temporary ban lift== | |||
Hello, I am Balzac Te'baghar, the computer teacher at MoHigh. I want to teach my students how to effectively spread their citing knowledge by giving an assignment of pre-selected wiki pages where they must enhance it by adding at least 3 details and 2 sources. I will NOT tolerate ANY vandalism. I ask that you lift the edit ban of {{ipvandal|163.150.137.68}} from Thursday, September 6 until Friday, September 14. Thank you - Balzac Te'baghar. | |||
== User:38.116.200.10 == | |||
You were the last to block {{ipvandal|38.116.200.10}}, not for the first time, obviously. I recall setting the block parameters to only block out IP edits indefinitely, which shouldn't have caused an autoblock of {{user|Rayquaza2233}} (which caused the removal of my original indefinite block and leads us to your "September 2007" block). Without giving too much away, I know about that specific IP address, and I feel that it should be permanently blocked for an indefinite amount of time. I can almost guarantee that not one week after your block expires, it will be blocked again. I applaud the efforts to get the whole school vandalism issue fixed , but nothing will ever be achieved. If anything, we're doing them a favour keeping their IP blocked for good. In the mean time, September 2007 is more than sufficient. --]'''<span style="background:gold;">(])</span>''' 02:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Now that I look into it even more, {{admin|Netsnipe}}(who is unfortunately on break at this time) made an error in unblocking the IP, given that {{user|Rayquaza2233}} is a vandal. This is starting to look fishy. --]'''<span style="background:gold;">(])</span>''' 02:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
==A request for assistance== | |||
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. ] 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC). | |||
== Ip: 216.20.9.22 that you blocked == | |||
the IP adress 216.20.9.22 that you blocked is part of the Weston Public School system. this ip is shared by a wide variety of users. if you could please unblock it, id really appreciate it. | |||
] 16:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Please advise, Ronald Ryan== | |||
Hi, I was hoping to get your advice. | |||
I added to the ] article. Ryan was the last man hanged in Australia (in 1967). What I added was evidence of his guilt. They were confessions he is described as having made in public. One was recorded by his priest (who was not his confessor). I gave my sources for the additions. The primary sources are trial transcripts and interviews with witnesses. They are listed in a secondary source. I gave both. | |||
== List of Internet Slang == | |||
Hello there. Maybe I'm missing something really obvious (I often do), but can you please tell me what was wrong with . Thanks, →''']]]''' 18:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Sure thing, there are two reasons actually. Although it is an acronym, it does not really fit the albeit vague definition of internet slang. That, and it does not return any hits on Google that I can find, so it appears to be an extremely non-notable acronym as well. Best regards, ] 18:27, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Ok then, that's fine :) Thanks for getting back to me. →''']]]''' 18:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
That whole section has been removed by a user who either has no account or did not log in (124.191.180.110) who simply removed it all on this basis: | |||
== Anon 204.218.244.11 == | |||
<blockquote> | |||
Concerning this ] and he/her/it's ], I really have to say I don't appreciate it. However, the downside is I also make "constructive edits" at this adress, and I can't afford to have it blocked.. How about I take his contributions under my watchful eye and make sure to revert when necessary..? That way the IP will be free of vandalism and a block won't be nessesary. What do you think..? -]|] 20:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
“deleted "alleged" confessions made by one author of many books, which cannot be proven. Ryan and Ryan's defense attorneys absolutely dispute this "35-year-later" allegation of guilt” | |||
: The inconvenience is quite mutual, I assure you. If you do not mind, it would be appreciated if you reserve your edits until after school. ] 20:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
</blockquote> | |||
:: But I do, which is why I was compelled to bring my query to your attention. Please allow me to take responsilbility for awhile regarding such behavior, if I can not handle it, then reinstate the block. I think that sounds sensible. What's your thoughts..? -]|] 20:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
See | |||
:: Hall monitor, please see: -]|] 20:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::: Thank you for bringing this to my attention, I have responded there as well. Best regards, ] 21:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::I am well aware of those constant blocks. Which is preciseley why I ask you let me take responsilbility and keep up on the IP's contributions. Note that the last 10 times had no one keeping an eye on the contributions enough to revert. I will take this seriously, and I request you give me a chance to do so.-]|] 21:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::: Your request has been brought before the Administrator's Noticeboard, and I will honour whatever decision is made. Best regards, ] 21:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
I could | |||
==My user page== | |||
*Revert (and possibly start an edit war) | |||
Thanks for mopping up that vandalism! :) - ] 17:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
*Discuss it on the talk page. However, I don't relish the thought of attempting to discuss something with a user who won't open an account and who has made half a dozen edits, all on the same general topic. | |||
*something else. | |||
What do you advise? ] 01:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
== ] (])—again... == | |||
(I forgot to sign the first time, sorry) | |||
Wow... it sure seems like the admin community has shown amazing patience with this poster child for immaturity. This person just attempted to tell another user that an "edit to Jennifer Vasquez a long time ago was not vandalism. I was simply stating a truth, because she is rumored to be adept at oral sex." If "rumored to be" equals "a truth", then reality is a long way from finding this... er... individual... ;) ]] ] 00:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== IP Number Block Request == | |||
Just tried blanking the page again... ]] ] 05:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hi, Hall Monitor, and congratulations on your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I was wondering if you could do something to stop ] from making edits on Misplaced Pages. This unregistered user has not only offended people with his immoral edits, but he has also defaced Misplaced Pages's reputation as a trustworthy online information portal. I came to you because I know how much you care about making Misplaced Pages as informative as possible. I am prepared to work in as many ways as possible to keep these creeps off of this "information powerhouse." If you click on the highlighted IP address located earlier in the article, a page will load that lists all of the edits this user has made, most of which are demeaning and derogatory. Thank you in advance, and don't hesitate to leave me a message on my "discussion" page. --] 23:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Apologies for the language, but this bottom-feeder's latest attempt to blank its page included, in the edit summary, "blank, bastards. Go fuck yourselves". Given this "person"'s history, from whom would I request, say, a sixth-month block from all of Misplaced Pages, including its own pages? ]] ] 02:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Unblock 198.86.93.254 == | |||
The next was even worse... ]] ] 02:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Back in 2005 you blocked 198.86.93.254 at the request of the school the IP belongs to. I got a request from that school to unblock it that appears legit. I can't tell if you are still active, so I am leaving this note, but I will unblock tomorrow if I don't hear from you otherwise. --] (]) 21:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Your deletion of the anon's personal attack == | |||
I understand the motives for your edit on ]. The comment you removed violates ] and, what's worse, is a waste of a few seconds of Jimbo's time. Nevertheless, I think that letting such things remain is generally better than giving their author the chance to play the martyr in a denunciation of censorship. Therefore, although I appreciate your thought, I would've reverted your edit if the anon hadn't already done so. ] 00:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Image copyright problem with Image:Martin Lee Anderson mugshot.jpg== | |||
==NTL cache== | |||
Thanks for uploading ]. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of ], but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets ]. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an ] linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check | |||
bmly-cache-8.server.ntli.net | |||
You just blocked the NTL cache. That's me, a whole host of other people who use NTL and a vandal. I've undone the block. ] | ] 23:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: My apologies, but wasn't the NTL collateral damage issue resolved long ago? ] 23:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Well i thought it was too. Something must have changed in the meantime. ] | ] 23:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:* That there is a ] on the image's description page for each article the image is used in. | |||
==Featured article protection== | |||
:* That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. | |||
Please do not protect the daily featured article. ] 23:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Additional 10c list header goes here --> | |||
: Sorry, I did not realise that the Marilyn Manson article was the daily FA; that atleast explains the sudden rampant vandalism though. It must be time for a wiki-break. Signing off, ] 23:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks == | |||
This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. --] (]) 03:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Many thanks for your support and kind comments on my request for adminiship, I'm sure you'll be glad to know the final result was 92/1/0. I am now an administrator and (as always) if I do anything you have issue with, please talk about it with me. --] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 11:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of Michael Storey (cinematographer)== | |||
== Thanks == | |||
]I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] 16:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: lightskyblue;"> | |||
== An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you == | |||
]'''<font color=green>Pgk's RFA</font>''' | |||
] | |||
---- | |||
The article you created, ''']''' maybe deleted from Misplaced Pages. | |||
Thanks for your support on my ]. | |||
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here: | |||
The final outcome was (80/3/0), so I am now an ]. I was flattered by the level of support and the comments, so I'm under real pressure not to disappoint, thus if you have any queries, suggestions or problems with any of my actions as an admin then please leave me a note --]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">]</font>)</sup> 10:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC) <!--- Note blatently stole the layout from ] --></div> | |||
:* '''].''' | |||
The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever: | |||
# You can list the page up for deletion on ]. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the <span class="plainlinks"></span>. | |||
# You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: ]. But '''don't''' wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.<br> | |||
# When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of ]. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.<br>Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: ] which may support the page you created being kept.<br>Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions. | |||
# You can ] into a larger or better established article on the same topic. | |||
If your page is deleted, you still ]. Good luck! ] (]) 21:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Block removal == | |||
Once again, many thanks. Also, check your e-mail, okay? -]|] 19:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Will do, and it appears we are making good progress with the vandalism problem from the Department of Defense Dependents School network. I'll keep you posted. Best regards, ] 19:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Invitation to , a focus group== | |||
== The Israeli-Palestinian edit conflict == | |||
Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Misplaced Pages. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Misplaced Pages, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you. | |||
At ], I assume that when you reverted you did not mean to ratify the unilateral uncommented deletion of the section ]. If I've misunderstood, could you please leave a note on the ] and let's discuss it. If I'm right, no need to respond, because I've restored it. -- ] | ] 07:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Yes, you are correct. Thank you for the restoration. ] 17:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Misplaced Pages in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated! | |||
==Adding images to a user page== | |||
Hey man,I need to know much. I am creating a user page for myself and want to know how I can get images from outside and keep them on my user page. | |||
Willing and able to help us out? . Want to know more? Visit our . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! ] (]) 03:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Also,while editing,how can you change an image into a new one from your saved pictures on your computer. ] 16:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] nomination of ] == | |||
== Yeah, I'm on it. :) == | |||
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]"). | |||
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
== DickyRobert == | |||
I've been eagerly watching your CheckUser request on DickyRobert because I've had my own runins with him and his sockpuppets. Just wanted to let you know that ] has been created; you might relist there and get a faster response. · ]<sup>]</sup>/<small>]</small> 21:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: I see that my ] has been redirected there instead. It is worth noting that ] previously redirect to ] which is why the nomination for Curps has been placed there. I still believe strongly that Misplaced Pages would greatly benefit from him receiving these privileges, and appreciate your follow up on this. Best regards, ] 21:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
== Good faith == | |||
I apologize if my tone in opposing your actions implied that I was questioning your good faith. Your good faith is not at issue. I am not questioning your motivations, I am questioning the appropriateness of your actions. -- ] 23:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: This is fine, and I accept that. Please understand that I have been giving this matter consideration for a number of weeks now, and to the best of my knowledge there is ''not'' yet a process for handling these types of requests. It was not until this morning that ] as a CheckUser Helpdesk was created. I am strongly of the opinion that we need to promote specific individuals, namely ] to have the ability to perform CheckUser requests, which is why I went forward with this ] public appeal to grant him these privileges. Appropriate or not, the reason that I selected ] as the place to make this appeal was because ] redirected there. Please accept my apologies as this was not meant to be a disruptive action, I have only the best interests of Misplaced Pages at heart. ] 23:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: I also accept your expression of good intentions, and I know you obviously feel this is a Very Good Thing, but I think the way you are going about it is inappropriate and will not achieve what you are trying to. My interest as a bureaucrat who is one of those who oversees the RfA page is that it not become a polling place for community sentiments that cannot be acted on there. -- ] 00:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Wait...== | |||
There was a vandal? I thought I'd just cover up for some people. ;-) (No problem.) ] ] 19:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== NEW CATEGORY PAGE == | |||
==Nomination for adminship== | |||
Woo woo! Thanks for ]! Now I'm all excited! :) :) --] 21:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I'll be accepting the nomination and answering the questions later on today (I'm at work right now...) --] 21:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: Wonderful, I'm glad to hear it and wish you the best of luck! ] 21:33, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Restrictive hours idea == | |||
In light of the realization that we may never get around all these schools sharing the same IP address, I request perhaps we could set up a time frame we could unblock then reblock again each day..? I don;t know, just popped in my head, as I can't see any other options. Tell me what you think about it; right now, I going go to bed. Cheers. -]|] 22:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: What sort of time frame would you suggest? ] 22:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::I was thinking 7:00 - 9:25 (wikipedian time). As I am in computer classes during that timeframe, respectively, and can keep up on vandalism more. Certainly not the whole day, however, because multiple school IP's vandlaism would be comming in from all sides. -]|] 22:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::What do you think..? -]|] 21:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Personally, I would not feel comfortable enforcing such a restriction without the consent of the appropriate school authorities. If the school principal, superintendent, or system administrator were to send this request via email to I would be more than happy to try to accomodate this. What would make this most difficult though is that there is no automated way to achieve this, meaning an administrator (or group of administrators) would have perform these blocks (and unblocks) on a daily basis. Best regards, ] 22:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::Ah, I see. I suppose we'll have to find another way, I guess. -]|] 03:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hello '''Washington-user!!''' What do you think of ? <br> Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary. <br>Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 12:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== My RfA == | |||
Hall Monitor, thank you very much for supporting me during my recent RfA campaign! Thanks to you, I am now an admin. Please ] if you need anything - I'll be glad to help you. Once again, thanks! --]]]]] 22:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
==ChristianEdwardGruber== | |||
] Hello Hall Monitor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''4''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure ], all biographies should be based on ]. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
Good candidate to nominate for an RFA: ]. ] 20:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Scott Erickson}}</small> | |||
== Just checked in... == | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Elizabeth Fishel}}</small> | |||
...and I not only caught a sockpuppet, I saw you on the blocked IP page. I guess I still care enough to block a monkey every once in a while. Drop me an e-mail...? - ] 00:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Loren Toews}}</small> | |||
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Ben Petrick}}</small> | |||
Thanks!--] (]) 22:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== AfD nomination of Renato M. E. Sabbatini == | |||
=={{user|169.244.143.115}}== | |||
Hello, Hall Monitor. I noticed that you tagged {{user|169.244.143.115}}, which seems to be a source of persistant vandalism, as an open proxy. It's my understanding that that IP address is a public-use computer for Maine Department of Libraries - do you have any reason for indicating that as an open proxy IP address? Thanks! ] <small>(])</small> 01:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Please see ]. You participated in the first AfD. - ] (]) 17:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Request for assistance== | |||
] has started a dozen or so articles, which is wonderful - she hasn't categorized them, or added a stub notice (as far as I've checked they are all stubs) and she has not cited any sources, which is bad. I left a brief note on her talk page about the first one I saw, but then I checked her list (from her User page) and found them all to be as I have noted. Unfortunately, Endomion does not view me in a positive light, as she attempted to make a number of unsupported, unsourced, POV edits to ] and I was one of the editors explaining why her views were not meeting with support. Would you be so kind as to post a friendly message on her page about the importance of citing verifiable sources? I think she would take it better from a party she sees as neutral (as she does not see me.) Thanks much - ]<sup>]</sup> 21:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: '''Comment''' The user in question only has a small percentage of stubs in the state described above, typically ones that were done within the last couple weeks. This can be verified by looking at the comprehesive list on the user's ] in the "Original Articles" section and the "Stubs" section. The user in question is an eventualist Wikipedian and would not view any such message to be friendly. ] 19:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] nomination of ] == | |||
::Ah well, apparantly not. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
:::In fact, the user would probably feel it was a form of gang ]. ] 20:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
== 199.195.109.4 == | |||
Hey, I am a student at the school with this IP address, and I agree with the block based on what I have seen from this IP's contribs. However, is there a way that I could contribute from this IP ''while'' I am logged in? If you look at some of the useful contribs from this IP (such as , , , and ), you will see that I sometimes add useful, relevant content to Misplaced Pages from this IP. I don't know if it is technically possible to do this, but I would greatly appreciate anything that could be done. You can also feel free to look at my logged-in contribs, I do not vandalize. '''<font color="82022C">]</font> <font color="FEC900">] / ]</font>''' 22:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Userpage == | |||
I was wondering if you can replace your CA flag image with ]. Thanks. ] <small><sup>] ] </sup></small> 02:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== |
==] of ]== | ||
] | |||
With a great deal of input, my ] from scratch is up for Featured Article status (self-nominated). Feel free to visit and ]! ]] ] 18:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
==RfA "serial opposers"== | |||
:'''subject lacks "significant independent coverage" in ] and is therefore not notable under the ]''' | |||
Hi, | |||
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
Just thought I'd drop a line to continue our discussion started at EurekaLott's RfA, since I must unfortunately continue to disagree with your view. Let me explain more fully. My belief that "serial opposers" should simply be left alone arises from several grounds: first, I dislike questioning of a voter's rationale -- if a voter opposes solely on the ground that "There should be no admins," he has a rationale to vote. This rationale is ludicrous, in the wiki-context, and the vote will likely be ignored by the b'crat. Arguing with him over the rationale is of little use; he is clearly outside the wiki-mainstream, and provoking him runs afoul of the spirit of WP:BEANS. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
It is true that such a serial opposer is being slightly disruptive; however, arguing with him over his vote only enlarges that disruption, draws more attention to his unusual views, and can attract well-meaning sympathizers (like FSF), who don't wish to see any vote questioned so strongly. Silence on the RfA really is the optimum approach to keep the RfA orderly. If a serial voter is abusive, or truly exceptionally annoying, problems with him may be taken to RfC, as was done with Boothy. | |||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 09:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
I'd argue, though, that -- as asinine as they seem -- serial opposers are sometimes ''good'' for the system. Remember, their votes are almost always ignored by the B'crat, and most RfA regulars. Clearly, the offending voter has a gripe, and needs to blow off steam; letting him do so alone may make him feel better, and after doing so many times, without provoking anyone, he may come to understand that his vote is essentially ignored. In the meantime, having a single oppose vote on every RfA serves as a symbolic reminder (ala ]) that the RfA system is an open one, and not clique driven, or "cabal"-ish. | |||
==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
I'd only worry about serial opposers if they began to multiply; again, in the spirit of WP:BEANS, I think this is ''less likely'' to happen if they are ignored, and left in peace alone on their protest "hilltop". | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 07:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
Best wishes, | |||
] | |||
] 17:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 03:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
* I have no idea how that justifies the act of ]. I see you're trying to say what's best for everyone, but allowing a user to walk off scott-free without letting them know they are in the wrong for being disruptive and/or trying to prove a point is unacceaptable. Nor was Freestylefrappe's spite voting "well -meant" ethier. Rfa's are for the eventually improvement of the encyclopedia by asisting users with more responsibility. They are not the place to "let off steam", troll, "let off a gripe", and certaintly not the place to ] at someone else's expense. Rfa is just that, rfa, and nothing more. People with such feelings not to do with that procedure should allow cooler heads to vote and refrain themselves. -]<sup>]</sup> 17:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:Truth is, looking at his record, MassiveEgo is probably a troll. Have you noticed, though, that he has at least started providing words to justify his vote, and even ''supported'' one? By being ourselves level-headed in response to his less-than-mature provocations, we might bring him into the "responsible user" fold yet. Our other serial opposer, Boothy, was a valuable contributor in other ways, so serial opposing isn't always "trolling." One other point where I disagree with you a bit -- I don't see how any candidate could take a serial opposer too seriously; I had ''looked forward'' to being opposed by Boothy, as a badge of honor, and in any case, simply telling an aggrieved candidate, "he always opposes" should soothe feelings. ] 18:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 21:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
::I don't see how voting out of blantent insolense can be a "badge of honor", but I'll respect your opinion. However, considering Massiveego's lack of communication skills when someone politely asked him his concenus for voting, he has decided to ignore them. No one has "aggrivated" him or "harrassed" him- he's just avoiding discussion. However, I am glad to see his lastest vote seems ''somewhat'' more civil and I really hope he continues to improve his behavior. -]<sup>]</sup> 18:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Kelvin Darnell Martin mugshot.jpg== | |||
* Thank you Xoloz for contacting me regarding this issue. While I understand your point of view, and even agree with it to a certain extent, I think there is a point where things stop being a minor nuisance and start becoming insulting and disruptive to illustrate a point, and I believe that this line has been crossed. If the actions persist I am afraid an RFC will need to be filed. ] 17:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
:I would support an RfC. That measure takes the discussion out of individual RfAs, where debating one (likely to be ignored) vote is a distraction for the candidate involved. ] 18:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Is there an RfC for freestylefrappe as well..? -]<sup>]</sup> 18:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::: There is an RFAR for freestylefrappe at ], but I am not party to it. Best regards, ] 18:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::Its already clear to everyone that his voting is disruptively based on ], and his overall actions and demeanor unacceaptable. I will not participate in the ordeal ethier, but I would very much like to read it. I invite you to do the same. -]<sup>]</sup> 18:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 15:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Whats wrong with this edit ? == | |||
==File source problem with File:Kelvin Darnell Martin mugshot.jpg== | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Carlos_Santana&diff=35713823&oldid=35713382 | |||
] | |||
The link I added was to a personal fan site, containing just info & pictures, it is not commercial & does not charge anything. Why was it removed ? I have seen links to Amazon in other entries, thats surely commercial ! {{unsigned2|20:15, 18 January 2006|Gungho}} | |||
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ]. | |||
: Are you the same person as IP ]? ] 20:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: The same computer but used by several people, I made 2 edits to the Santana entry & then decided to register under the name "gungho" which I will use from now on. I see there have been a few edits under the "Chris Moyles" entry. These must have been done by my nephew earlier today. They are not funny & you can delete them. But, yes I posted the Santana entries as 82.45.1.145. | |||
::: Yes, I asked because I was concerned about the rash of vandalism to ] today which included edits from your own IP address. With respect to the link you added to ], unofficial fansites are generally removed because they are not a reliable source of information, making them inappropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia such as Misplaced Pages. If you have concerns regarding any other article, such as one which links to an Amazon website as you've suggested, please do not hesitate to bring it to my attention so that it may be dealt with accordingly. Best regards, ] 20:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
==Chokesoncock vandal== | |||
Was just going threw the new user log and discovered this wasn't blocked: {{vandal|Chokesoncock}} | |||
Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 21:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Is there a block in order here? ] <sup>]</sup><sup>]</sup> 22:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Yes, I do believe that this qualifies as an inappropriate user name, as covered by our ]. This account has been blocked and the owner notified should he or she wish to select an alternate name. Best regards, ] 22:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== 10 Christian biographies nominated for deletion == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Thanks for voicing your opinion on several of the Christian biographies that A.J.A. nominated for deletion, yesterday. Here are several others that could use your input: | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people_%28second_nomination%29 | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ron_Moseley | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Randall | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Combs | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neal_Weaver | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Greg_Baker | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Dorim_Kim | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
God bless, | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
--] 22:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' | |||
: Hi Jason. Yes, I am aware of the series of nominations made by ] yesterday. I will review the additional links you've provided as time permits, and comment if I feel that I have something insightful to share. Best regards, ] 22:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Greetings, admin. Please wear this badge with pride. ] (]) 10:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 19:39, 13 April 2022
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Hall Monitor has not edited Misplaced Pages since February 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Discussion archives
Welcome back
welcome back, hope u had a good break Jaranda 03:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nice to see you back. – Chacor 05:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Welcome back! Hope you're still here to see this. You don't seem to have made any edits since the 14th - Mike | Talk 20:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Me too - good to see the familiar name popup in the block log. --pgk 22:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Just saw you reverting something on my watch list--great to see you again! Mackensen (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Your service to Misplaced Pages is most deserving of this barnstar. Good job! Sharkface217 21:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
- Thank you for the barnstar, still warming back up. :-) Hall Monitor 20:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Montclair High School temporary ban lift
Hello, I am Balzac Te'baghar, the computer teacher at MoHigh. I want to teach my students how to effectively spread their citing knowledge by giving an assignment of pre-selected wiki pages where they must enhance it by adding at least 3 details and 2 sources. I will NOT tolerate ANY vandalism. I ask that you lift the edit ban of 163.150.137.68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) from Thursday, September 6 until Friday, September 14. Thank you - Balzac Te'baghar.
User:38.116.200.10
You were the last to block 38.116.200.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), not for the first time, obviously. I recall setting the block parameters to only block out IP edits indefinitely, which shouldn't have caused an autoblock of Rayquaza2233 (talk · contribs) (which caused the removal of my original indefinite block and leads us to your "September 2007" block). Without giving too much away, I know about that specific IP address, and I feel that it should be permanently blocked for an indefinite amount of time. I can almost guarantee that not one week after your block expires, it will be blocked again. I applaud the efforts to get the whole school vandalism issue fixed , but nothing will ever be achieved. If anything, we're doing them a favour keeping their IP blocked for good. In the mean time, September 2007 is more than sufficient. --Jay(Reply) 02:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Now that I look into it even more, Netsnipe (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)(who is unfortunately on break at this time) made an error in unblocking the IP, given that Rayquaza2233 (talk · contribs) is a vandal. This is starting to look fishy. --Jay(Reply) 02:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).
Ip: 216.20.9.22 that you blocked
the IP adress 216.20.9.22 that you blocked is part of the Weston Public School system. this ip is shared by a wide variety of users. if you could please unblock it, id really appreciate it. Gamersedge 16:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Please advise, Ronald Ryan
Hi, I was hoping to get your advice.
I added to the Ronald Ryan article. Ryan was the last man hanged in Australia (in 1967). What I added was evidence of his guilt. They were confessions he is described as having made in public. One was recorded by his priest (who was not his confessor). I gave my sources for the additions. The primary sources are trial transcripts and interviews with witnesses. They are listed in a secondary source. I gave both.
That whole section has been removed by a user who either has no account or did not log in (124.191.180.110) who simply removed it all on this basis:
“deleted "alleged" confessions made by one author of many books, which cannot be proven. Ryan and Ryan's defense attorneys absolutely dispute this "35-year-later" allegation of guilt”
See here
I could
- Revert (and possibly start an edit war)
- Discuss it on the talk page. However, I don't relish the thought of attempting to discuss something with a user who won't open an account and who has made half a dozen edits, all on the same general topic.
- something else.
What do you advise? Avalon 01:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
(I forgot to sign the first time, sorry)
IP Number Block Request
Hi, Hall Monitor, and congratulations on your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I was wondering if you could do something to stop 207.63.215.24 from making edits on Misplaced Pages. This unregistered user has not only offended people with his immoral edits, but he has also defaced Misplaced Pages's reputation as a trustworthy online information portal. I came to you because I know how much you care about making Misplaced Pages as informative as possible. I am prepared to work in as many ways as possible to keep these creeps off of this "information powerhouse." If you click on the highlighted IP address located earlier in the article, a page will load that lists all of the edits this user has made, most of which are demeaning and derogatory. Thank you in advance, and don't hesitate to leave me a message on my "discussion" page. --HG707 23:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Unblock 198.86.93.254
Back in 2005 you blocked 198.86.93.254 at the request of the school the IP belongs to. I got a request from that school to unblock it that appears legit. I can't tell if you are still active, so I am leaving this note, but I will unblock tomorrow if I don't hear from you otherwise. --agr (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Martin Lee Anderson mugshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Martin Lee Anderson mugshot.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Misplaced Pages's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Michael Storey (cinematographer)
I have nominated Michael Storey (cinematographer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michael Storey (cinematographer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Skomorokh 16:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created, Michael_Storey_(cinematographer) maybe deleted from Misplaced Pages.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
- You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
- You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Misplaced Pages:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
- When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions. - You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.
If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 21:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group
Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Misplaced Pages. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Misplaced Pages, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.
I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Misplaced Pages in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!
Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 03:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Julia DeMato
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Julia DeMato. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Julia DeMato (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
NEW CATEGORY PAGE
Hello Washington-user!! What do you think of this category?
Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary.
Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 12:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Traveller-in-Tacoma (talk • contribs)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Hall Monitor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Scott Erickson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Elizabeth Fishel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Loren Toews - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ben Petrick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Renato M. E. Sabbatini
Please see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Renato M. E. Sabbatini (2nd nomination). You participated in the first AfD. - Eastmain (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Julia DeMato
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Julia DeMato. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Julia DeMato (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Daniel Joseph Sheehan
The article Daniel Joseph Sheehan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- subject lacks "significant independent coverage" in reliable sources and is therefore not notable under the general notability guideline
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anotherclown (talk) 09:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WilliamH (talk) 21:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kelvin Darnell Martin mugshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kelvin Darnell Martin mugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Kelvin Darnell Martin mugshot.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kelvin Darnell Martin mugshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Greetings, admin. Please wear this badge with pride. ThatDislikedOne (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |