| Revision as of 20:52, 19 January 2006 editGoldenTie (talk | contribs)148 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:25, 30 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete'''. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">''']]]''' <small>{]}</small></span> 17:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| No media coverage. 100 nn Google hits. Copy/paste of their page. Submitted by site owner. Fails ]. Extremely invaluable information. -- ] |
No media coverage. 100 nn Google hits. Copy/paste of their page. Submitted by site owner. Fails ]. Extremely invaluable information. -- ] 00:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. Haven't much of anything. --] |
*'''Delete''' per nom. Haven't much of anything. --] 00:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' blatant advertisement<small>—''The preceding ] comment was added by'' ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned--> | *'''Delete''' blatant advertisement<small>—''The preceding ] comment was added by'' ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned--> | ||
| *'''Delete''' as above. Note: I'm about to remove a spamvert image, so if you need further convincing please do check the previous revision. --] 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as above. Note: I'm about to remove a spamvert image, so if you need further convincing please do check the previous revision. --] 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Vanity site < |
*'''Delete''' Vanity site ] <i><b>]</b></i> ] 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. I would say the MUSH itself might be popular enough to warrant an article, but this has uncorrectable POV problems as is. ] 03:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. I would say the MUSH itself might be popular enough to warrant an article, but this has uncorrectable POV problems as is. ] 03:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' advertising. p.s. to nom, ] is the same as valuable -- ]<small>|]</small> 09:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' advertising. p.s. to nom, ] is the same as valuable -- ]<small>|]</small> 09:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ** I know. --] |
** I know. --] 17:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' blatant advertisement, certainly as it stands. (A '''redirect''' to ] could be useful, especially if that page was made more encyclopedic, explaining more clearly the history, what is involved, etc., rather than giving precedence to the technicalities of the programming.) ] 15:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' blatant advertisement, certainly as it stands. (A '''redirect''' to ] could be useful, especially if that page was made more encyclopedic, explaining more clearly the history, what is involved, etc., rather than giving precedence to the technicalities of the programming.) ] 15:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ** Great, let's start citing ''all'' these nn mush sites in ] now! :P --] |
** Great, let's start citing ''all'' these nn mush sites in ] now! :P --] 17:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' non encyc, vanity, etc. ] 16:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' non encyc, vanity, etc. ] 16:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete if not tidied up''': it reads like the back of a game packet. Make it more neutral and informing. | *'''Delete if not tidied up''': it reads like the back of a game packet. Make it more neutral and informing. ] 20:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' ] 02:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 06:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 07:25, 30 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 17:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Havenmush
No media coverage. 100 nn Google hits. Copy/paste of their page. Submitted by site owner. Fails WP:V. Extremely invaluable information. -- Perfect 00:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Haven't much of anything. --Perfecto 00:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete blatant advertisement—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Onthost (talk • contribs) .
- Delete as above. Note: I'm about to remove a spamvert image, so if you need further convincing please do check the previous revision. --kingboyk 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity site J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I would say the MUSH itself might be popular enough to warrant an article, but this has uncorrectable POV problems as is. Meekohi 03:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete advertising. p.s. to nom, invaluable is the same as valuable -- Astrokey44|talk 09:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- I know. --Perfecto 17:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete blatant advertisement, certainly as it stands. (A redirect to MUSH could be useful, especially if that page was made more encyclopedic, explaining more clearly the history, what is involved, etc., rather than giving precedence to the technicalities of the programming.) Carbonix 15:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Great, let's start citing all these nn mush sites in MUSH now! :P --Perfecto 17:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non encyc, vanity, etc. The Deviant 16:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete if not tidied up: it reads like the back of a game packet. Make it more neutral and informing. GoldenTie 20:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Arbustoo 02:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Dimitrii 06:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.