| Revision as of 21:49, 26 May 2010 editHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,822 edits →Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024 edit undoCarlesFort (talk | contribs)22 edits →Edit page - Legatum Institute: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| ⚫ | |algo = old(10d) | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
| ⚫ | |algo = old(10d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Nomoskedasticity/Archives | |archive = User talk:Nomoskedasticity/Archives | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * }} | * }} | ||
| == civility note == | |||
| == Notice == | |||
| Misplaced Pages is about discussion, do not claim I am being disruptive again with making your report, It is quite normal to discuss. Your comment.. " the same individual who is being disruptive" ... if you don't like it make a report or keep it to yourself, better if you strike it, but its up to you, continue with your accusations and I will report you. ] (]) 15:58, 9 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :How about if you just get off my talk page. Your posts ''again'' show difficulties with reading comprehension. Though I agree with the notion that you are being disruptive, if you make a great effort you will discover that the person to whom you should have written today about this issue is not me. ] (]) 16:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| Please avoid edit comments such as this and this | |||
| == Arbitration Enforcement notice == | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| :Thank you for notifying me of your filing official charges. I most certainly not the only person making long comments on the page, nor am I the only person discussing contentious matters. I am not currently editing because I feel that when a matter is changing this rapidly, it is better to wait. I do feel, however, you are singling me out. Other editors are discussing matters equally contentious and, arguably, only tangentially related to the article. We shall see what the administrators have to say on the matter, I am sorry you feel I am being disruptive.] (]) 13:49, 15 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| == 6 UBF - NAE membership == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| UBF is most certainly a member of the National Association of Evangelicals. The NAE page was modified by them to only show a dozen or so main "denomination" members. UBF is not a denomination, so it's not listed, along with thousands of other organizations that are also no longer listed. I am reverting your edit. UBF's membership is easily verifiable. (http://www.ubf.org/aboutus/images/nae1.jpg) "The NAE is a body of believers made up of over 40 denominations and thousands of individual churches, organizations, universities and individuals who understand that together we can do more." (http://www.nae.net/membership) ] (]) 19:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Also, there is a third party reference to UBF's membership and NAE here: http://www.cosim.info/conferences/Partnership_Case_Study-Moreau_&_UBF.pps ] (]) 19:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| == About collocating vs. co-locating... == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| ...and . | |||
| Well, I honestly didn't know, I stand corrected. And thanks for recognizing I was in good faith :-). | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Richard Goldstone == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| FYI: ]. It's a work in progress - any feedback would be most welcome. -- ] (]) 11:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :FYI, your comment about Dersh is in violation of BLP and I suggest you delete it immediately. ] (]) 16:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == ] - new version == | |||
| </div> | |||
| You commented recently on some BLP issues concerning ]. I've written a considerably expanded and improved version of the article in my userspace at ]. If you have any comments about this new version before it gets transferred into article space, please feel free to comment at ]. -- ] (]) 23:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == Edit page - Legatum Institute == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| Just a courtesy note to let you know that we have received a submission from Prof. Eastell, which I've merged into the article. It appears to be neutral and acceptable, although I haven't carefully checked the cites. ] (]) 13:29, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Good morning, colleague, | |||
| == Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on ] == | |||
| I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "''whose sock are you?''" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it. | |||
| <center>'''You are receiving this message because of your involvement at the ] article. Please don't consider it an assumption of bad faith'''</center> | |||
| As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| Thank you very much. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| ⚫ | <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> ] (]) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
| *In relation to the above, you are informed that the ] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. ] | ] 21:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please avoid edit comments such as this and this
Arbitration Enforcement notice
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit page - Legatum Institute
Good morning, colleague,
I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "whose sock are you?" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it.
I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them.
Thank you very much.