| Revision as of 05:36, 7 June 2010 editBruceSwanson (talk | contribs)974 edits email added.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:07, 30 January 2012 edit undoBruceSwanson (talk | contribs)974 editsmNo edit summary | ||
| (97 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| am a proofreader and copy editor living in the ] area. I have written Misplaced Pages's ] article, an example of pure original research (see the deleted sections ]) that gets hits a day during the week and about half that on weekends. It's taken from ''Proofreading: The Street Bible with Apocrypha''. I have also posted ''Keystroke Lotteries: A Speculative Essay'' on the future of typesetting, proofreading, copy editing, and translations. Both postings can be found . | |||
| I am a copy editor and proofreader living in the Los Angeles area. I've begun a on proofreading and its management; and have posted a speculative essay on our probable lottery-based, crowd-sourced future, . My email address is ''bruce.swanson.california@gmail.com'' | |||
| Since many of my current edits deal with ] I should probably point out that as a ] in excellent health whose only recreational drugs are found in ], ], and an occasional ], my viewpoint is merely that of an incredulous bystander. From that perspective I've come to realize that the orthodox ] hypothesis as it is found in Misplaced Pages articles and Talk pages cannot be maintained ''in detail'' by editors using their real names. That's because it is so fundamentally dishonest that anyone trying to validate its logic and assumptions would necessarily damage their personal and professional reputation. However, the existence of , of which I am a layman , would seem to indicate that AIDS-dissident viewpoints ''can'' be maintained by people using their real names. I recommend one simple rule to guide their edits: | |||
| ]: {{cquote| ''Primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Misplaced Pages, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source can be used only to make descriptive statements that can be verified by any educated person without specialist knowledge.''}} | |||
| This alone would eviscerate the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. | |||
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
Latest revision as of 02:07, 30 January 2012
I am a proofreader and copy editor living in the Los Angeles area. I have written Misplaced Pages's proofreading article, an example of pure original research (see the deleted sections here) that gets 500-600 hits a day during the week and about half that on weekends. It's taken from Proofreading: The Street Bible with Apocrypha. I have also posted Keystroke Lotteries: A Speculative Essay on the future of typesetting, proofreading, copy editing, and translations. Both postings can be found here.