| Revision as of 23:15, 9 June 2010 editScottywong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,031 edits →Vanessa Rogers← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:51, 2 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I have restored the AFD to the text at the time of closing. It should be noted that the socking block against Inniverse was later reversed, and the suspected relationship to Azviz has been determined not to exist.—](]) 23:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :{{la|Vanessa Rogers}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Rogers}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | :{{la|Vanessa Rogers}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Rogers}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 14: | ||
| Contested prod. I can find no substantive treatment of this person in ] that would satisfy the requirements of ] or the criteria of ]. ] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | Contested prod. I can find no substantive treatment of this person in ] that would satisfy the requirements of ] or the criteria of ]. ] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: The article under discussion here has been {{tl|rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the ].</small> | |||
| {{ARSnote}} | |||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 22: | ||
| ::*Inniverse blocked as sock of Azviz.—](]) 16:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC) | ::*Inniverse blocked as sock of Azviz.—](]) 16:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :::*Irony. ] (]) 22:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC) | :::*Irony. ] (]) 22:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Google news only finds one thing listing her and cyberbullying . She writes for ] which although only has 18,000 readers seems notable the BBC did commission here to work on two series, one of which has a Misplaced Pages article, ]. Is the award she got notable? ''"highly and unequivocally recommended" review from Library Journal'' ]''' 04:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Google news only finds one thing listing her and cyberbullying . She writes for ] which although only has 18,000 readers seems notable the BBC did commission here to work on two series, one of which has a Misplaced Pages article, ]. Is the award she got notable? ''"highly and unequivocally recommended" review from Library Journal'' ] 04:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :She has some coveage as you've mentioned, I'm not convinced it is enough to demonstrate notability though, it's pretty minor stuff and a weak keep at best, I'll stay with delete. ] (]) 07:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | :She has some coveage as you've mentioned, I'm not convinced it is enough to demonstrate notability though, it's pretty minor stuff and a weak keep at best, I'll stay with delete. ] (]) 07:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources does not exist for this particular "Vanessa Rogers". Although it is possible to scour the internet for tidbits of information on various individuals, that does not make it "significant coverage". Claim to fame is as an author and she does not meet the guidelines at ]. ] (]) 17:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources does not exist for this particular "Vanessa Rogers". Although it is possible to scour the internet for tidbits of information on various individuals, that does not make it "significant coverage". Claim to fame is as an author and she does not meet the guidelines at ]. ] (]) 17:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' this ]. Fails ]. ] <small>]</small> 23:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' this ]. Fails ]. ] <small>]</small> 23:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fails ]. Can find no outside sourcing about her. On Google, a photographer of the same name appears more notable than she is. Google Books finds only books BY her, nothing about her or citing her. On Amazon, if you search for "Cyberbullying" (the name of her best known work), a dozen other books pop up - but not hers. --] (]) 14:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:51, 2 February 2022
I have restored the AFD to the text at the time of closing. It should be noted that the socking block against Inniverse was later reversed, and the suspected relationship to Azviz has been determined not to exist.—Kww(talk) 23:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg 02:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Vanessa Rogers
- Vanessa Rogers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. I can find no substantive treatment of this person in reliable, independent sources that would satisfy the requirements of WP:BIO or the criteria of WP:AUTHOR. Deor (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: The article under discussion here has been {{rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the Article Rescue Squadron.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. I googled her, the first link is her home page. The article appears to be true and demonstrates she is non notable. Szzuk (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Keep She's does have some press coverage describing her as "a highly respected trainer" . As far as significant coverage, I'm not so sure. Cyberbullying is a very hot topic with the deaths of Megan Meier and Phoebe Prince. Rogers may be of interest to some readers. I have added some sourcing. Eudemis (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
*Keep Notable in Britain for her leading work in the area of Cyberbullying, and as a speaker and trainer known for her work with young men. Inniverse (talk) 03:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Inniverse blocked as sock of Azviz.—Kww(talk) 16:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Irony. Szzuk (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Google news only finds one thing listing her and cyberbullying . She writes for Young People Now which although only has 18,000 readers seems notable the BBC did commission here to work on two series, one of which has a Misplaced Pages article, The Baby Borrowers. Is the award she got notable? "highly and unequivocally recommended" review from Library Journal Dream Focus 04:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- She has some coveage as you've mentioned, I'm not convinced it is enough to demonstrate notability though, it's pretty minor stuff and a weak keep at best, I'll stay with delete. Szzuk (talk) 07:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources does not exist for this particular "Vanessa Rogers". Although it is possible to scour the internet for tidbits of information on various individuals, that does not make it "significant coverage". Claim to fame is as an author and she does not meet the guidelines at WP:AUTHOR. Location (talk) 17:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete this resume. Fails WP:AUTHOR. SnottyWong talk 23:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR. Can find no outside sourcing about her. On Google, a photographer of the same name appears more notable than she is. Google Books finds only books BY her, nothing about her or citing her. On Amazon, if you search for "Cyberbullying" (the name of her best known work), a dozen other books pop up - but not hers. --MelanieN (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.