Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sika redem (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:49, 10 June 2010 editJclemens (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,425 editsm Reverted edits by Snottywong (talk) to last version by Ron Ritzman← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:40, 2 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''delete'''. -- ''']''' (]) 00:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
	===]===		===]===
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|M}}
	<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sika redem}}</ul></div>		<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sika redem}}</ul></div>
	:{{la\|Sika redem}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sika redem (2nd nomination)}}\|2=AfD statistics}})		:{{la\|Sika redem}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sika redem (2nd nomination)}}\|2=AfD statistics}})
	:({{Find sources\|Sika redem}})		:({{Find sources\|Sika redem}})
	Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading ] makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although ] may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)		Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading ] makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although ] may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: The article under discussion here has been {{tl\|rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the ].</small>
	*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>		*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
	*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>		*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
Line 11:		Line 18:
	*'''Delete''' only the album was on ] (and they don't look that good a label for ]), the ep was on The Communion. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. ] (]) 11:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' only the album was on ] (and they don't look that good a label for ]), the ep was on The Communion. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. ] (]) 11:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
	<hr style="width:50%;" />		<hr style="width:50%;" />
	:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 02:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->]		:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 02:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
			*'''Delete''' Fails ]. Released one full-length album over four years ago. ] <small>]</small> 23:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 16:40, 2 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Sika redem

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading WP:MUSIC makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although Undergroove Records may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. Narutolovehinata5 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Note: The article under discussion here has been {{rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the Article Rescue Squadron.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Comment. I have to admire the nominator's attitude here. Being here to build an encyclopedia means writing articles, not trying to make them go away. Therefore, deleting articles should not be something that one wants to do. If more nominators had this attitude then AFD would be a more pleasant place to work and we would have fewer battleground AFDs. Article tagged for rescue--Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Borderline keep, with a major WP:NPOV rewrite needed. Criterion #5 of WP:BAND is "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." They've got one album and one EP to an indie record label (Undergroove) that sort of qualifies. That alone I'd say wasn't quite enough, but adding the reviews from Kerrang and Rocksound, the profile in NME and the airplay on Radio 1, I think it scrapes it by the narrowest of margins. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete only the album was on Undergroove (and they don't look that good a label for wp:music), the ep was on The Communion. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:BAND. Released one full-length album over four years ago. SnottyWong talk 23:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.