Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Wendy Swanscombe: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:49, 10 June 2010 editJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,425 editsm Reverted edits by Snottywong (talk) to last version by Kenilworth Terrace← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:59, 5 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Wendy Swanscombe}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wendy Swanscombe}}|2=AfD statistics}}) :{{la|Wendy Swanscombe}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wendy Swanscombe}}|2=AfD statistics}})
:({{Find sources|Wendy Swanscombe}}) :({{Find sources|Wendy Swanscombe}})
Another target of our newest(?) serial deprodder; prod rationale was "Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person". In any event, I can find no ], nor evidence that any of the criteria of ] are satisfied. ] (]) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Another target of our newest(?) serial deprodder; prod rationale was "Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person". In any event, I can find no ], nor evidence that any of the criteria of ] are satisfied. ] (]) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: The article under discussion here has been {{tl|rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the ].</small>

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' - Well known and prolific author has 66 hits on Gbooks . ] (]) 04:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - Well known and prolific author has 66 hits on Gbooks . ] (]) 04:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': zero hits on google news archive. Six books on amazon, only one review ever posted by a reader. The books do exist (you can preview one on google books -- random quote, page 132, "But another orgasm was evidently being brewed in another pair of fine hairy balls"), but commentary and coverage from the outside world does not.--] (]) 17:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Comment''': zero hits on google news archive. Six books on amazon, only one review ever posted by a reader. The books do exist (you can preview one on google books -- random quote, page 132, "But another orgasm was evidently being brewed in another pair of fine hairy balls"), but commentary and coverage from the outside world does not.--] (]) 17:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. As I said in the prod, no evidence that this is anything other than a house pseudonym for the Nexus porno imprint. ] (]) 20:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. As I said in the prod, no evidence that this is anything other than a house pseudonym for the Nexus porno imprint. ] (]) 20:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - No sources exist to establish notability. Fails ]. ] <small>]</small> 23:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 05:59, 5 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg 02:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Wendy Swanscombe

Wendy Swanscombe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another target of our newest(?) serial deprodder; prod rationale was "Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person". In any event, I can find no substantive treatment of this perhaps-living person in reliable, independent sources, nor evidence that any of the criteria of WP:AUTHOR are satisfied. Deor (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Note: The article under discussion here has been {{rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the Article Rescue Squadron.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.