Misplaced Pages

Talk:Dennis T. Avery: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:38, 5 July 2010 editStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits German links considered BLP violations?: No.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:30, 23 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,463 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(9 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=no|listas=Avery, Dennis|
{{WPBiography
{{WikiProject Biography}}
|living=yes
|class=stub
|listas=Avery, Dennis
}} }}
== accusations of vandalism ==

please don´t accuse me of vandalism, i will revert radical changes that delete references without discussion. but we can discuss and meet in the middle.] (]) 14:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


== German links considered BLP violations? == == German links considered BLP violations? ==
Line 23: Line 18:
Nope i`m not trashing around at all, ''According to critics he is the source of a claim that ] is more dangerous to eat than food produced using chemical pesticides because of usage of animal manure in organic farming'' That is a contentious claim, and requires solid sourcing. There were none for it. BLP is quite clear in this, removing the content until either another source was found or a translation was made available was the right call ] (]) 15:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Nope i`m not trashing around at all, ''According to critics he is the source of a claim that ] is more dangerous to eat than food produced using chemical pesticides because of usage of animal manure in organic farming'' That is a contentious claim, and requires solid sourcing. There were none for it. BLP is quite clear in this, removing the content until either another source was found or a translation was made available was the right call ] (]) 15:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
:No. To repeat myself: "Did you or any other editor request a translation?" --] (]) 15:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC) :No. To repeat myself: "Did you or any other editor request a translation?" --] (]) 15:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
::Never got the chance, removed it, had some work to do then all this was waiting when i got back. ] (]) 15:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
:::So. You removed it for the wrong reason. You got lucky in that the result (in my opinion) was ok, but that was mere coincidence. In fact, the removal violated not only ], but also ] - if in doubt, assume the editor who added the source carefully checked it. Note that the same holds for off-line sources. I wouldn't be surprised if more people here can read German than have access to a good research library, especially given that ] has reached quite a good level of accuracy. --] (]) 15:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk: Dennis T. Avery.
Why the use of ''was'', ''did'' and ''believed'' when writing about Avery? I believe he is alive and well. His employer, Hudson Institute, shows him to be living: http://www.hudson.org/experts/19-dennis-t-avery. As of today, the Hudson Institute's website features an obituary of Amy A. Kass, who died yesterday, Aug. 19, 2015. I believe the problem arose from a confusion with Dennis S. Avery. See "Dennis T. Avery: I'm not dead" at http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2012/jul/30/dennis-t-avery-im-not-dead. I suspect that someone deleted his death information but forgot to change the verbs.
] (]) 01:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081202122204/http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st279/st279a.html to http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st279/st279a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}

Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">]:Online</sub></small> 05:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:30, 23 January 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

German links considered BLP violations?

MN removed a German link because being in German it was a BLP vio . Or something; I'm really not sure what his rationale was William M. Connolley (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

And again; with "rv blp exemption claimed, blp states contentious material should be removed on sight, if the ref`s can`t be read then there is no way to verify the claims)". This claim seems dubious to me: *you* can't read them, but people who read German can William M. Connolley (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Then that ref belongs on the german wp not the english one, blp says any contentious material which can`t be verified should be removed mark nutley (talk) 14:44, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Um, yes. But *can't be verified* means "in principle" not "by you". Just because you can't read something is irrelevant William M. Connolley (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
English WP = English readers, go figure mark nutley (talk) 14:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Slow down, both of you, and stay in one place, please. Mark, you are wrong. Read WP:NONENG. However, the German source did not support the claim in the first place, so the article is better now. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 14:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Stephan, with regards to wp:noneng it says "When quoting a source in a different language, provide both the original-language quotation and an English translation, in the text or in a footnote". As this was not done ca nyou tell me if i was correct in removing the source under blp? mark nutley (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
No, you were not. Nobody was quoting anything. Quotes are used fairly rarely on Misplaced Pages. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 15:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Ok given it is a BLP and noneng also says this When citing a source in a different language, without quotations, the original and its translation should be provided if requested by other editors: this can be added to a footnote, or to the talk page if too long for a footnote is it not better to remove said contentious material until a translation is provided? mark nutley (talk) 15:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
You are thrashing around for excuses now. Did you or any other editor request a translation? And how was the material contentious? No-one complained about the material - you complained about the language of the source. Finally, posting translations is only plausible if there are small snippets that can be used under fair use, or if the source is not under copyright. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Nope i`m not trashing around at all, According to critics he is the source of a claim that organic food is more dangerous to eat than food produced using chemical pesticides because of usage of animal manure in organic farming That is a contentious claim, and requires solid sourcing. There were none for it. BLP is quite clear in this, removing the content until either another source was found or a translation was made available was the right call mark nutley (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

No. To repeat myself: "Did you or any other editor request a translation?" --Stephan Schulz (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Never got the chance, removed it, had some work to do then all this was waiting when i got back. mark nutley (talk) 15:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
So. You removed it for the wrong reason. You got lucky in that the result (in my opinion) was ok, but that was mere coincidence. In fact, the removal violated not only WP:NONENG, but also WP:AGF - if in doubt, assume the editor who added the source carefully checked it. Note that the same holds for off-line sources. I wouldn't be surprised if more people here can read German than have access to a good research library, especially given that Google Translate has reached quite a good level of accuracy. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 15:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk: Dennis T. Avery. Why the use of was, did and believed when writing about Avery? I believe he is alive and well. His employer, Hudson Institute, shows him to be living: http://www.hudson.org/experts/19-dennis-t-avery. As of today, the Hudson Institute's website features an obituary of Amy A. Kass, who died yesterday, Aug. 19, 2015. I believe the problem arose from a confusion with Dennis S. Avery. See "Dennis T. Avery: I'm not dead" at http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2012/jul/30/dennis-t-avery-im-not-dead. I suspect that someone deleted his death information but forgot to change the verbs. Professionaleducator (talk) 01:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dennis T. Avery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 05:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Categories: