Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/L0de Radio Hour (second nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:30, 30 January 2006 view sourceCalton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users78,494 editsm []← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:05, 19 March 2023 view source Legobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,657 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''delete'''. ] 12:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
Less notable than your average blog. Also unverifiable, on cursory inspection. Most likely just an attempt at trolling. Less notable than your average blog. Also unverifiable, on cursory inspection. Most likely just an attempt at trolling.
Line 7: Line 13:
::::*'''Comment''' censorship is wrong. ''<l0de> "Remove this article from your laughable excuse for a website or I will kill you all, and your families. And yes, this is a sincere death threat, you fucking faggots." <l0de> Love, <l0de> l0de.'' ::::*'''Comment''' censorship is wrong. ''<l0de> "Remove this article from your laughable excuse for a website or I will kill you all, and your families. And yes, this is a sincere death threat, you fucking faggots." <l0de> Love, <l0de> l0de.''
::::: What has l0de's quote got to do with it? ] | ] 17:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC) ::::: What has l0de's quote got to do with it? ] | ] 17:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as unverifiable. &mdash; ''''']'' <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small>''' <small>18:00, Jan. 27, 2006</small> *'''Delete''' as unverifiable. &mdash; ''''']'' <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small>''' <small>18:00, Jan. 27, 2006</small>
*'''Merge''' - with ]. l0de was forced to stop producing the show for some time due to a set of ] and no, this is not a joke. We all knew in advance that someone would have nominated this page and so I declare your attempt at trolling us a failure. -- ] 18:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Merge''' - with ]. l0de was forced to stop producing the show for some time due to a set of ] and no, this is not a joke. We all knew in advance that someone would have nominated this page and so I declare your attempt at trolling us a failure. -- ] 18:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
:Merge? LRH has nothing to do with ]. Why should it be merged? --] 18:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC) :Merge? LRH has nothing to do with ]. Why should it be merged? --] 18:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 13: Line 19:
*'''Strong merge''' with GNAA article, the context which makes it most relevant, even if it's not a GNAA project per se. ] <small>]</small> 20:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Strong merge''' with GNAA article, the context which makes it most relevant, even if it's not a GNAA project per se. ] <small>]</small> 20:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
:LRH has absolutely nothing to do with GNAA. Merging LRH with GNAA would make about as much sense as merging Ford with GNAA. It has no context there. GNAA is reserved for GNAA ''only''. --] 14:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC) :LRH has absolutely nothing to do with GNAA. Merging LRH with GNAA would make about as much sense as merging Ford with GNAA. It has no context there. GNAA is reserved for GNAA ''only''. --] 14:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
::Was Henry Ford a member of the GNAA? ] <small>]</small> 06:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
:::No. l0de's show has nothing to do with the GNAA other than a couple of GNAA members listening in. l0de himself has stated on several occasions that his show is not a GNAA effort, but rather his alone. GNAA does not compose his entire audience. If it's merged with GNAA, it will be deleted on sight due to irrelevance. --] 13:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
*Just '''delete''' it. More BS. This was ], but kept after the trolls descended on it. They'll likely be back. -] 20:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC) *Just '''delete''' it. More BS. This was ], but kept after the trolls descended on it. They'll likely be back. -] 20:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' - Here it comes another failed attempt at trolling. Please consider joining the GNAA and learn to troll properly. -- ] 21:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC) :'''Comment''' - Here it comes another failed attempt at trolling. Please consider joining the GNAA and learn to troll properly. -- ] 21:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 23: Line 31:
*'''Delete''', as per l0de's orders ] 17:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', as per l0de's orders ] 17:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
*Just '''delete''' it. --] | ] 00:30, 30 January 2006 (UTC) *Just '''delete''' it. --] | ] 00:30, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', nn ] 00:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''I don't care what you do with it'''. No vote. ] 17:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 22:05, 19 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 12:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

l0de Radio Hour

Less notable than your average blog. Also unverifiable, on cursory inspection. Most likely just an attempt at trolling.

<snip>:
  • Comment censorship is wrong. <l0de> "Remove this article from your laughable excuse for a website or I will kill you all, and your families. And yes, this is a sincere death threat, you fucking faggots." <l0de> Love, <l0de> l0de.
What has l0de's quote got to do with it? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 17:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Merge? LRH has nothing to do with our organization. Why should it be merged? --dj28 18:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
LRH has absolutely nothing to do with GNAA. Merging LRH with GNAA would make about as much sense as merging Ford with GNAA. It has no context there. GNAA is reserved for GNAA only. --dj28 14:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Was Henry Ford a member of the GNAA? CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 06:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
No. l0de's show has nothing to do with the GNAA other than a couple of GNAA members listening in. l0de himself has stated on several occasions that his show is not a GNAA effort, but rather his alone. GNAA does not compose his entire audience. If it's merged with GNAA, it will be deleted on sight due to irrelevance. --dj28 13:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Here it comes another failed attempt at trolling. Please consider joining the GNAA and learn to troll properly. -- Femmina 21:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm not a troll, I'm a rotten bastard and an obnoxious asshole; please learn the difference. And learn to use basic punctuation, while you're at it. -R. fiend 21:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
They let people like you admin wikipedia now? Wow this place sinks to a new low. Of course, considering they ley the likes of David Gerard and Curps admin, I'm not too surprised. --timecop 04:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I've been dropped out from school at 16 and never had enough money to pay for an english teacher so you'll have to tolerate my bad punctuation, spelling, whatever. -- Femmina 01:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
You have a training program? I thought you might recruit the pros. Or is it like the League of Shadows in Batman Begins where they select people who are good and make them better? CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 21:14, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
"The GNAA is really a bunch of animu faggots. Especially timecop." -- Femmina 01:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.