Misplaced Pages

User talk:Agapetos angel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:09, 31 January 2006 editAgapetos angel (talk | contribs)2,142 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:01, 19 May 2019 edit undoFastilyBot (talk | contribs)Bots239,264 edits BOT: Notify user of possible file issue(s) 
(296 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Image:Sarfati.jpg ==
{{block|3RR}} ]<sup>]</sup> 23:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


# Go to ] and edit it to add <code><nowiki>{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}</nowiki></code>, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''.
KillerChihuahua, please review the history of ]. Links (that were not in dispute) were accidently deleted, and when I added them back in, an editor 'reverted' and claimed it was a concensus that I needed to abide by. I put the links back in and left a message in Talk that the links were not disputed content, and now find myself blocked. There are several issues going on, not the least of which is admin bullying. Please review this issue and reconsider the block. I have well documented my dispute issues, and although have several edits, they are for '''''different''''' issues (restoring accidently deleted links, adding a weasel word box in for disputed content, adding source links where none existed, etc.). There are several editors that are tag-team reverting anything I put in, in an obvious attempt to bully me and make me give up, so their POV pushing can remain (complete with weasel words and bald assertations that are not supported by sources). I have a request for mediation (as well as a request for admin abuse review) for this very problem. Thank you ] 23:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
# On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.


Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself.
NB:


If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Replaceable --> ] 07:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
FeloniousMonk reported three revert rule violation:


== Input requested ==
*1st revert: (17:13, 30 January 2006)
** Guettarda reverted and removed (nearly--I was incorrect in comment) all the new links I had just added; the POV revert is discussed in talk but s/he was ignoring talk and just reverting entirely, regardless of edits.
*2nd revert: 01:46, 30 January 2006
**After another editor reverted Guettarda, s/he called it a whitewash and again reverted the entire article, removing new edits and links (and undisputed content). I put it back in and commented in Talk, asking why she was removing undisputed content.
*3rd revert: 15:04, 30 January 2006
** This was '''not''' a revert of any prior content, but rather an '''addition''' of the weasel word warning box
*4th revert: 15:21, 30 January 2006
**Fixed content in the header that was mangled by the various reverts.
*5th revert: 15:26, 30 January 2006
** When Duncharris, without validation, removed the weasel word warning box, I replaced it and commented in talk; '''unrelated''' to any previous reverts.
*6th revert: 16:03, 30 January 2006
**Jim62sch, without checking, reverted to remove the weasel word box, stating that 'some' was not a weasel word, and in the process he went to an older version which deleted valid links. I added them back in.


Your input is requested Thank you. --] 00:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
FeloniousMonk jumped in and reverted (again, another editor that is merely reverting without cause). His claim of 'consensus' is not valid, as the content of the section I fixed is not in any sort of dispute. Please note that '''''any''''' edit I made on that article was being reverted, regardless. If this were related to the ongoing disputed content over the 'Scientist?' section, I'd understand their concern, but I requested mediation and have continued to attempt to reach a consensus (without agreeing to ignore wikipedia guidelines against weasel words). As it stands, it's just bully tactics being employed to make me give up and go away. ] 00:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

==File source problem with File:Scream.JPG==
]
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Misplaced Pages's ], ]. If the image is ] and ], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)''' per ] criterion ]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 04:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 -->

== ] ==

{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 -->
== ] of ] ==
]

The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:01, 19 May 2019

Image:Sarfati.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sarfati.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hbdragon88 07:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Input requested

Your input is requested here. Thank you. --profg 00:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Scream.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Scream.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 04:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dragon sym.jpg

Notice

The file File:Dragon sym.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)