Misplaced Pages

Steven Milloy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:27, 23 July 2010 editBigK HeX (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,642 edits Undid revision 375083338 by Marknutley (talk) 3RR warning to mark nutley← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:50, 20 December 2024 edit undoFluyt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users748 editsmNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(310 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American lobbyist and commentator}}
'''Steven J. Milloy''' is the "]" commentator for ] and runs the Web site junkscience.com, which is dedicated to debunking what Milloy labels "faulty scientific data and analysis." He is a self-described ], in the American sense of the term.<ref>, Interview in FrontPageMagazine.com, May 12, 2008.</ref>
{{Essay-like|date=July 2023}}
'''Steven J. Milloy''' is a lawyer, ], author and former ] commentator. Milloy is the founder and editor of the blog junkscience.com.


Milloy's career has been spent denying the results of science that government agencies rely on for protecting the public.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Waldman |first=Scott |date=June 12, 2018 |title=Steve Milloy doesn't like 'climate bedwetters' |url=https://www.eenews.net/articles/steve-milloy-doesnt-like-climate-bedwetters/ |access-date=2023-01-22 |work=] |language=en-US |archive-date=2023-01-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122155738/https://www.eenews.net/articles/steve-milloy-doesnt-like-climate-bedwetters/ |url-status=live }}</ref> His close financial and organizational ties to ] and ] have been the subject of criticism, as Milloy has consistently disputed the ] and the health risks of ].<ref name="mojo">{{cite magazine |last=Mooney |first=Chris |publisher=] |url=https://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/05/some_like_it_hot.html |title=Some Like It Hot |date=May 2005 |access-date=2013-01-22}}</ref><ref name="tnr">{{cite magazine|url=http://www.freepress.net/news/print.php?id=13581 |title=Smoked Out: Pundit For Hire|last=Thacker|first=Paul D.|date=January 27, 2006|magazine=The New Republic|publisher=The New Republic|page=1|access-date= July 23, 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060719211120/http://www.freepress.net/news/print.php?id=13581 |archive-date = July 19, 2006 |url-status=dead}} Reprinted at freepress.net.</ref>
Among the topics Milloy has addressed are what he believes to be false claims regarding ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="junkdefine">, accessed 20 Sept 2006.</ref> Milloy also runs CSRWatch.com, which monitors and criticizes the ] movement. From the 1990s until the end of 2005, he was an adjunct scholar at the ] ], which hosted the JunkScience.com site. He is currently an adjunct scholar at the ]. Milloy is head of the ], a ] he runs with former tobacco executive Tom Borelli. He also operates the ], a ] which is critical of environmental science, from his home in ]. Milloy has authored four books.


From the 1990s until the end of 2005, Milloy was an adjunct scholar at the ] ], which hosted the JunkScience.com site. He was an adjunct scholar at the ] from 2005 to 2009.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Steven J. Milloy |url=https://cei.org/experts/steven-j-milloy/ |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=Competitive Enterprise Institute |language=en-us |archive-date=2023-01-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120213626/https://cei.org/experts/steven-j-milloy/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Milloy's close financial and organizational ties to tobacco and oil companies have been the subject of criticism from a number of sources, as Milloy has consistently criticized the science linking secondhand smoke to health risks and ] to global warming.<ref name="ucs">{{cite web|url=http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/ExxonMobil-GlobalWarming-tobacco.html|title=Scientists' Report Documents ExxonMobil’s Tobacco-like Disinformation Campaign on Global Warming Science|date=3 January 2007|publisher=]|accessdate=2007-01-11}}</ref><ref name="mojo">]: ''.'' May/June 2005</ref><ref name="tnr">{{cite news|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20060719211120/http://www.freepress.net/news/print.php?id=13581|title=Smoked Out: Pundit For Hire|last=Thacker|first=Paul D.|date=27 January, 2006|work=The New Republic|publisher=The New Republic|page=1|accessdate=23 July 2010}}</ref>


He operated The ] (TASSC)<ref>{{cite report |last=Milloy |first=Steve |url=http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/any77d00 |title=Annual Report - 1997 |date=January 7, 1998 |publisher=] |access-date=July 7, 2007 |archive-date=June 14, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110614120551/http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/any77d00 |url-status=live }} Document accessed at {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150623173240/http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/ |date=2015-06-23 }}</ref> established by ] to counter legislation against second-hand smoke.
==Educational background==


Since 2020 Milloy has served on the board of the Heartland Institute.<ref name="HeartlandBio">{{Cite web |title=Steven Milloy: publisher, junkscience.com |url=https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/steven-milloy/ |access-date=2023-01-22 |website=heartland.org |archive-date=2023-01-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122155737/https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/steven-milloy/ |url-status=live }}</ref> {{asof|2023}} Milloy is a Senior Policy Fellow with the Energy & Environment Legal Institute.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Fellows & Advisors |url=https://eelegal.org/fellows-advisors-2/ |access-date=2023-03-01 |website=E&E Legal |language=en-US |archive-date=2023-03-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230301133931/https://eelegal.org/fellows-advisors-2/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Milloy holds a ] in Natural Sciences from ], a Master of Health Sciences in Biostatistics from the ] School of Hygiene and Public Health, a ] from the ], and a Master of Laws from the ].<ref name="junkcv">, accessed 20 Sept 2006.</ref>

==Education==
Milloy holds a ] in Natural Sciences from ], a Master of Health Sciences in Biostatistics from the ] School of Hygiene and Public Health,<ref name="edu-skeptics">{{cite web|url=https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/39424/7100|title=Does Steven Milloy hold the degrees he claims?|first=Nate|last=Eldridge|publisher=Stack Exchange|date=12 September 2017|access-date=17 September 2017|archive-date=24 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724232822/https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/39423/does-steven-milloy-hold-the-degrees-he-claims/39424|url-status=live}}</ref> a ] from the ], and a Master of Laws from the ].<ref name="junkcv"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170917080049/https://junkscience.com/about/ |date=2017-09-17 }}, accessed 16 Sept 2017. Section "Education".</ref>


==Career== ==Career==
The National Environmental Policy Institute (NEPI) was formed in early 1993 by Congressmen ] (R-PA) and ] (D-MI).<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724232754/https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/ |date=2023-07-24 }}, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.</ref>


Most of the initial funding for this 'greenwash' lobby group came from ] and other oil companies. Milloy styled himself as the 's Director of Science Policy Studies. NEPI's publication, ''Science-Based Risk Assessment: A Key to the Superfund Puzzle'', says: "Sound science and more accurate risk assessments can significantly reduce the costs of remediation, while reducing real health risks when they are found. ... Milloy of the NEPI suggests that the costs of cleanups would fall by 60 percent if the program focused more directly on risk when identifying the appropriate remedies."<ref>
According to his website, in 1994, Milloy was project leader of the Regulatory Impact Analysis Project, Inc. for the ]. The Cato Institute, where he was listed as an adjunct scholar, published his work from 1995 to 2005. Milloy began his criticism of "Junk science" as president of the ] in 1996. In March 1997, Milloy became president of the Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (TASSC), which later became the Advancement of Sound Science Center.<ref>.</ref>{{dead link}} He has been a correspondent for Fox News since 2002.
, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.</ref>


At the same time, Milloy was working through Philip Morris's specialist-science/PR company APCO & Associates, but was relegated to working behind the scenes as a contact for the newly formed TASSC, and on developing a new electronic-mail/computer business venture known as "Issues Watch" for APCO. APCO formally established TASSC on October 1, 1993. The budget for the first full year of operation was $365,411.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101204151312/http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/xzb65e00/pdf |date=2010-12-04 }}, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.</ref>
==Junk science==
{{main|Junk science}}


By 1994, according to his website, Milloy was project leader of the Regulatory Impact Analysis Project, Inc. for the ]. The Cato Institute, where he was listed as an adjunct scholar, published his work from 1995 to 2005. Milloy began his opposition to what he called "junk science" as president of the Environmental Policy Analysis Network in 1996.{{citation needed|date=September 2022}}
Milloy has popularized the use of the term "junk science" in public debate, which he defines as "faulty scientific data and analysis used to advance special and, often, hidden agendas." According to Milloy, "the junk science 'mob' includes: The MEDIA, may use junk science for sensational headlines and programming…PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS, may use junk science to bamboozle juries into awarding huge verdicts," and others.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.junkscience.com/define.html|title=Junk science?|publisher=junkscience.com|accessdate=2007-07-20}}</ref> Milloy frequently applies the term to climate change science and certain health controversies.


Milloy's employment by the EOP Group Inc. (major lobbyists) dates back to before 1995, and it includes a record of lobbying on behalf of the Fort Howard Corporation, the International Food Additives Council, Monsanto Co. and Edison Electrics. The ] also proposed to Philip Morris that Milloy and his partners Michael Gough and ] should be used to attack the FDA through reports to the House and Senate on risk Management reform.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724232757/https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/ |date=2023-07-24 }}, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724232825/https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/ |date=2023-07-24 }}, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.</ref>
Scientists and science writers have argued the term is used, by Milloy and others, almost exclusively to "denigrate scientists and studies whose findings do not serve the corporate cause," in the words of David Michaels.<ref name="Michaels">{{cite book|last=Michaels|first=David|title=Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|date=2008|isbn=9780195300673|page=57}}</ref> In an editorial in ], Editor-in-Chief Rudy Baum called Milloy's junkscience.com website "the best known" example of "a right wing effort in the U.S. to discredit widely accepted science, technology and medicine." He went on to label Milloy "a tireless antiscience polemicist" who applies the term "junk science" to "anything that doesn't match his right-wing concept of reality."<ref name="C&EN">{{cite journal|last=Baum|first=Rudy|date=June 9, 2008|title=Defending Science|journal=Chemical and Engineering News|publisher=American Chemical Society|volume=86|issue=37|pages=5|url=http://pubs.acs.org/cen/editor/86/8623editor.html}}</ref> Along similar lines, an editorial in the '']'' noted that "... attacking the science underlying difficult public policy decisions with the label of 'junk' has become a common ploy for those opposed to regulation. One need only peruse JunkScience.com to get a sense of the long list of public health issues for which research has been so labeled."<ref>{{cite journal |author=Samet JM, Burke TA |title=Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking |journal=American journal of public health |volume=91 |issue=11 |pages=1742–4 |year=2001 |pmid=11684591 |doi=10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1742 |pmc=1446866}}</ref>


In March 1997, Milloy moved from the backroom to become president of The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (TASSC) ] of New Mexico by Philip Morris], which later became The Advancement of Sound Science Center.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/may/business/pt_junkscience.html |title=The junkman climbs to the top |access-date=2017-08-07 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050620082118/http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/may/business/pt_junkscience.html |archive-date=2005-06-20 }}</ref>
===Secondhand smoke===


He has links through Philip Morris and Fox News to ] and News Corporation. He was a correspondent for Fox News between 2002 and 2009, and he became a policy director at Murray Energy and a member of ]'s first presidential ].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/12/climate/scott-pruitt-epa-endangerment-finding.html?_r=0|title=Scott Pruitt Faces Anger from Right over E.P.A. Finding He Won't Fight|newspaper=The New York Times|date=April 12, 2017|last1=Davenport|first1=Coral|access-date=April 12, 2017|archive-date=April 15, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170415080258/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/12/climate/scott-pruitt-epa-endangerment-finding.html?_r=0|url-status=live}}</ref>
Milloy has criticized research linking ] to cancer, claiming that "the vast majority of studies reported no statistical association."<ref name="secondhandsmoke"> By Steven Milloy, March 9, 2001</ref> In 1993, Milloy dismissed an ] report linking secondhand tobacco smoke to cancer as "a joke." Five years later Milloy claimed vindication after a ] criticized the EPA's conclusions. However, the court's finding against the EPA was overturned on appeal.


==Junk science==
When the '']'' published a ] confirming a link in 1997, Milloy wrote, "Of the 37 studies, only 7—less than 19 percent—reported statistically significant increases in lung cancer incidence... Meta-analysis of the secondhand smoke studies was a joke when EPA did it in 1993. And it remains a joke today."<ref name="bmjsmoke"></ref> When another researcher published a study linking secondhand smoke to cancer, Milloy wrote that she "... must have pictures of journal editors in compromising positions with farm animals. How else can you explain her studies seeing the light of day?"{{cn}}<ref name="PRWatch1">, accessed 23 Sept 2006.</ref>
Milloy is the founder and editor of the blog junkscience.com.<ref name="PRWatch2000no3">{{cite magazine |first1=Sheldon |last1=Rampton |first2=John |last2=Stauber |title=How Big Tobacco Helped Create "the Junkman" |url=http://www.prwatch.org/files/pdfs/prwatch/prwv7n3.pdf |magazine=PR Watch |publisher=] |volume=7 |issue=3 |year=2000 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150725215754/http://www.prwatch.org/files/pdfs/prwatch/prwv7n3.pdf |archive-date=2015-07-25 |url-status=dead |author-link1=Sheldon Rampton |author-link2=John Stauber}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Who is Steve Milloy? |url=https://junkscience.com/who-is-steve-milloy/ |access-date=2023-01-22 |website=junkscience.com |archive-date=2023-01-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122120506/https://junkscience.com/who-is-steve-milloy/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


Milloy has used the term "]" in public debate, which he defines as "faulty scientific data and analysis used to advance special and, often, hidden agendas." ] has argued the term is used, by Milloy and others, almost exclusively to "denigrate scientists and studies whose findings do not serve the corporate cause".<ref name="Michaels">{{cite book|last=Michaels|first=David|title=Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health|publisher=]|location=New York|year=2008|isbn=978-0-19-530067-3|page=|title-link=Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health}}</ref>
====Links to tobacco industry====
While at FoxNews.com, Milloy has continued to criticize claims that secondhand tobacco smoke causes cancer.<ref name="tnr"/> However, with the release of confidential tobacco industry documents as part of the ], the objectivity of Milloy's stance on secondhand smoke has been questioned. Based on this documentation, journalists ] and ], as well as the ] and others, have contended that Milloy is a paid advocate for the tobacco industry.<ref name="tnr"/>


In an editorial in '']'', Editor-in-Chief Rudy Baum called Milloy's junkscience.com website "the best known" example of "a right wing effort in the U.S. to discredit widely accepted science, technology and medical information."<ref name="C&EN">{{cite journal|last=Baum|first=Rudy|date=June 9, 2008|title=Defending Science|journal=Chemical and Engineering News|volume=86|issue=37|page=5|url=http://pubs.acs.org/cen/editor/86/8623editor.html|doi=10.1021/cen-v086n023.p005|doi-access=free|access-date=June 11, 2008|archive-date=June 9, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080609005432/http://pubs.acs.org/cen/editor/86/8623editor.html|url-status=live}}</ref> An editorial in the '']'' noted that "... attacking the science underlying difficult public policy decisions with the label of 'junk' has become a common ploy for those opposed to regulation ... One need only peruse JunkScience.com to get a sense of the long list of public health issues for which research has been so labeled."<ref>{{cite journal |author=Samet JM, Burke TA |title=Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking |journal=American Journal of Public Health |volume=91 |issue=11 |pages=1742–4 |year=2001 |pmid=11684591 |doi=10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1742 |pmc=1446866}}</ref>
Milloy's junkscience.com website was reviewed and revised by a ] firm hired by the ].<ref name="rjrmemo">. From the at the ]. Accessed 5 October 2006.</ref> Milloy also worked as executive director of ] (TASSC), which was established in 1993 by ] and its public relations firm "to expand and assist Philip Morris in its efforts with issues in targeted states."<ref name="tnr"/><ref>, available at the . Accessed 5 October 2006.</ref><ref name="lancetreview">{{cite journal |author=Ong EK, Glantz SA |title=Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study |journal=Lancet |volume=355 |issue=9211 |pages=1253–9 |year=2000 |pmid=10770318 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5}}</ref> A 1994 Philip Morris memo listed TASSC among its "Tools to Affect Legislative Decisions".<ref>, from the . Accessed 5 October 2006.</ref> According to its 1997 annual report, TASSC "sponsored" junkscience.com.<ref>, Steven Milloy, January 7th, 1998. Document accessed at on July 7, 2007.</ref>


===Second-hand smoke===
'']'' reported that Milloy, who is presented by ] as an independent journalist, was under contract to provide consulting services to Philip Morris through the end of 2005.<ref name="tnr"/> In 2000 and 2001, for example, Milloy received a total of $180,000 in payments from Philip Morris for consulting services.<ref name="pmbudget">. Accessed 5 October 2006.</ref> A spokesperson for Fox News stated, "Fox News was unaware of Milloy's connection with Philip Morris. Any affiliation he had should have been disclosed."<ref name="tnr"/> Milloy's association with the Cato Institute ended shortly afterwards; however, {{As of|2008|alt=as of March 2008}}, he continues to write for FoxNews.com, where he is described as a "junk science expert."<ref> Accessed 16 October 2006.</ref> Monbiot wrote: "Even after Fox News was told about the money had been receiving from Philip Morris and Exxon, it continued to employ him, without informing its readers about his interests."<ref>, by George Monbiot. Published as an excerpt in '']'' on September 19, 2006; accessed July 23, 2007.</ref> Thacker wrote:
Milloy has opposed legitimate research linking ] to cancer, falsely claiming that "the vast majority of studies reported no statistical association."<ref name="pmid11684593">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ong EK, Glantz SA |title=Constructing "Sound Science" and "Good Epidemiology": Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms |journal=Am J Public Health |volume=91 |issue=11 |pages=1749–57 |year=2001 |pmid=11684593 |doi=10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749 |pmc=1446868 }}</ref><ref name="secondhandsmoke"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184936/http://www.junkscience.com/foxnews/fn030901.html |date=2007-09-30 }} By Steven Milloy, March 9, 2001</ref><ref name=IARC2004>{{harvnb|IARC|2004}} {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180607085206/http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol83/index.php |date=2018-06-07 }}</ref>
{{Quote|Objective viewers long ago realized that Fox News has a political agenda. But, when a pundit promotes this agenda while on the take from corporations that benefit from it, then Fox News has gone one disturbing step further.<ref name="tnr"/>}}


In 1993, Milloy dismissed an ] report linking second-hand tobacco smoke to cancer as "a joke." Five years later Milloy claimed vindication after a federal court contradicted the E.P.A.'s conclusions.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Schwartz |first=John |date=1998-07-19 |title=Judge Faults EPA Findings on Secondhand Smoke Impact |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-jul-19-mn-5265-story.html |access-date=2023-02-22 |work=] |language=en-US |archive-date=2023-04-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230415050252/http://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-jul-19-mn-5265-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> However, the court's finding against the EPA was ]. When the '']'' published a ] confirming a link in 1997, Milloy misrepresenting {{citation needed|date=September 2022}} the study wrote, "Of the 37 studies, only 7—less than 19 percent—reported statistically significant increases in lung cancer incidence... Meta-analysis of the secondhand smoke studies was a joke when EPA did it in 1993. And it remains a joke today."<ref name="bmjsmoke">{{Cite web|url=http://www.junkscience.com/news/bmjsmoke.html |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20061106043720/http://www.junkscience.com/news/bmjsmoke.html |url-status=dead |title=Secondhand Joking, by Steven Milloy |archivedate=November 6, 2006}}</ref><ref name=Circ07>{{cite journal |last1=Tong |first1=Elisa K. |last2=Glantz |first2=Stanton A. |title=Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease |journal=Circulation |date=16 October 2007 |volume=116 |issue=16 |pages=1845–1854 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.715888 |pmid=17938301 |s2cid=4021497|doi-access=free }}</ref> When another researcher published a study linking second-hand smoke to cancer, Milloy wrote that she "... must have pictures of journal editors in compromising positions with farm animals. How else can you explain her studies seeing the light of day?"<ref name="urlwww.junkscience.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.junkscience.com/decem98.html |title=www.junkscience.com |first=Steven |last=Milloy |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101125080948/http://junkscience.com/decem98.html |archive-date=2010-11-25 }}</ref><ref>
===The environment===
{{Cite news
| last1 = Stauber
| first1 = John
| last2 = Rampton
| first2 = Sheldon
| title = The Junkyard Dogs of Science
| newspaper = ]
| location = Oxford, England
| publisher = New Internationalist Publications
|date=July 1999}}
</ref>


====Links to tobacco industry====
Milloy has been critical of the ], acknowledging that it has improved ] but arguing that it has forced Americans to "surrender many freedoms." Milloy argued that "air pollution in the U.S. was more of an aesthetic than a public health problem . That is even more the case today."<ref>. Accessed 10 October 2006.</ref>
While at FoxNews.com, Milloy has continued to attack the scientific consensus<ref name="kessler">{{harvnb|Kessler|2006}}</ref><ref name=IARC2004/><ref>{{cite web |url = https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/content/profiles/tobaccorelatedexposures.pdf |title = Environmental Tobacco Smoke |website = 11th Report on Carcinogens |publisher = U.S. ] |access-date = 2007-08-27 |url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080716173310/http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/eleventh/profiles/s176toba.pdf |archive-date = 2008-07-16 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/general_facts/index.htm |title = Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet |publisher = U.S. ] |date = 2017-02-21 |access-date = 2021-07-30 |archive-date = 2021-08-21 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210821220759/https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/general_facts/index.htm |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/10/index.html |title = Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke |publisher = U.S. ] |access-date = 2007-08-22 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070905172350/http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/10/index.html |archive-date = 2007-09-05 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_10_2X_Secondhand_Smoke-Clean_Indoor_Air.asp |title = Secondhand Smoke |publisher = ] |access-date = 2007-08-27 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070914162226/http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_10_2X_Secondhand_Smoke-Clean_Indoor_Air.asp |archive-date = 2007-09-14 }}</ref> that second-hand tobacco smoke causes cancer.<ref name="tnr"/> However, with the release of confidential tobacco industry documents as part of the ], the objectivity of Milloy's stance on second-hand smoke has been questioned. Based on this documentation, journalists ] and ], as well as the ] and others, have contended that Milloy is a paid advocate for the tobacco industry.<ref name="tnr"/>


Milloy's junkscience.com website was reviewed and revised by a ] firm hired by the ].<ref name="rjrmemo"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150113025048/http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/syq70d00 |date=2015-01-13 }}. From the {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150623173240/http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/ |date=2015-06-23 }} at the ]. Accessed October 5, 2006.</ref>
Milloy maintains the position that "The ] is another area where knowledge is insufficient to draw conclusions. There is no "hole," but only a thinning of the stratospheric ozone layer over the South Pole. The size and depth of the "hole" varies from year to year. No one knows why ... it is unclear what effect CFC releases have had on the Earth's ozone layer."<ref></ref>
<ref name="lancetreview">{{cite journal |author=Ong EK, Glantz SA |title=Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study |journal=Lancet |volume=355 |issue=9211 |pages=1253–9 |year=2000 |pmid=10770318 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5|s2cid=25145666 }}</ref> A 1994 Philip Morris memo listed TASSC among its "Tools to Affect Legislative Decisions".<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070704050040/http://www.pmdocs.com/PDF/2046847121_7137_0.PDF |date=2007-07-04 }}, from the {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112031534/http://www.pmdocs.com/ |date=2020-11-12 }}. Accessed October 5, 2006.</ref> According to its 1997 annual report, TASSC "sponsored" junkscience.com.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080618091113/http://ltdlimages.library.ucsf.edu/imagesa/a/n/y/any77d00/Sany77d00.pdf |date=2008-06-18 }}, Steven Milloy, January 7th, 1998. Document accessed at {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150623173240/http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/ |date=2015-06-23 }} on July 7, 2007.</ref>


'']'' reported that Milloy, who is presented by ] as an independent journalist, was under contract to provide consulting services to Philip Morris through the end of 2005.<ref name="tnr"/> In 2000 and 2001, for example, Milloy received a total of $180,000 in payments from Philip Morris for consulting services.<ref name="pmbudget"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130901155806/http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/kwk84a00 |date=2013-09-01 }}. Accessed October 5, 2006.</ref> A spokesperson for Fox News stated, "Fox News was unaware of Milloy's connection with Philip Morris. Any affiliation he had should have been disclosed."<ref name="tnr"/>
===Climate Change===


===Climate change===
Milloy has consistently argued from the position of a ] that ] has little impact on ] and that regulations to limit ] emissions are unwarranted and harmful to business interests. He has recently offered a prize of $500,000 to anyone who can "prove, in a scientific manner, that humans are causing harmful global warming," stating that "JunkScience.com, in its sole discretion, will determine the winner, if any."<ref>, a Steven Milloy website. Accessed May 25, 2008.</ref>
{{see also|climate change denial}}
Milloy claims that ] has little impact on ], ] the ], and that regulations to limit ] are unwarranted and harmful to business interests. He offered a prize of $500,000 to anyone who can "prove, in a scientific manner, that humans are causing harmful global warming", stating that "JunkScience.com, in its sole discretion, will determine the winner, if any."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/ |title=Ultimate Global Warming Challenge |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210421145717/https://ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/ |archive-date=2021-04-21 |url-status=dead |access-date=May 25, 2008}} A Steven Milloy website.</ref>


In 2004, when the ] was released by the ] and the ], Milloy wrote that the report "pretty much debunks itself."<ref>, 12 Nov., 2004</ref> Milloy's assertions were disputed by the lead author of the study,<ref name="mojo"/> as well as by climate scientist Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, who criticized Milloy for taking "one result out of context and present unwarranted conclusions, knowing that a lay audience will not easily recognise their fallacy."{{cn}}<ref></ref> In 2004, when the ] was released by the ] and the ], Milloy wrote that the report "pretty much debunks itself."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.junkscience.com/fox/milloy111204.html |title=Polar Bear Scare on Thin Ice |first=Steven |last=Milloy |date=November 12, 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930185012/http://www.junkscience.com/fox/milloy111204.html |archive-date=2007-09-30}}</ref> Milloy based his assertions that the variation was natural on his interpretation of just one graph from the overview of the large study. One of the lead authors of the study, oceanographer ], commented that those taking Milloy's position would "have to refute what are hundreds of scientific papers that reconstruct various pieces of this climate puzzle." Milloy's assertion was repeated by lobbyists including the ]<ref name="mojo"/>


In 2005, it was reported that ]s operating out of Milloy's home, and in some cases employing no staff, have received large payments from ] during his tenure with Fox News.<ref name="tnr"/><ref name="mojo"/> A Fox News spokesperson stated that Milloy is "... affiliated with several not-for-profit groups that possibly may receive funding from Exxon, but he certainly does not receive funding directly from Exxon."<ref name="mojo"/> In 2005, it was reported that ]s operating out of Milloy's home, and in some cases employing no staff, have received large payments from ] during his tenure with Fox News.<ref name="mojo"/><ref name="tnr"/><ref>$40,000 to the Advancement of Sound Science Center and $50,000 to the Free Enterprise Action Institute. Both organizations were registered to Milloy's home address. source: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110825153033/http://motherjones.com/environment/2005/05/some-it-hot |date=2011-08-25 }}, motherjones.com . May/June 2005</ref> A Fox News spokesperson stated that Milloy is "... affiliated with several not-for-profit groups that possibly may receive funding from Exxon, but he certainly does not receive funding directly from Exxon."<ref name="mojo"/>


Milloy is the Executive Director of DemandDebate.com,<ref>, '']'', Oct 1, 2007.</ref> an organization that seeks to eliminate what it calls "bias" in environmental education.<ref>, accessed on www.lastvideo.net, July 12, 2007.</ref>{{deadlink}} A Competitive Enterprise Institute press release says he "coordinated" the group's activities at the recent ] concert in New York, at which a plane circled the event pulling a banner reading, "DON’T BELIEVE AL GORE — DEMAND DEBATE.COM."<ref>, ] Press Release, July9th, 2007.</ref> A Competitive Enterprise Institute press release says Milloy "coordinated" a climate change denial action at the 2007 ] concert in New York, where activists campaigned among the attendees and a plane circled the event pulling a banner reading, "DON’T BELIEVE AL GORE — DEMAND DEBATE.COM."<ref>{{cite press release |date=July 9, 2007 |url=http://www.cei.org/gencon/003,06028.cfm |title=Bureaucrash and the "Demand Debate" Campaign Crash Live Earth New York |publisher=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071009042731/http://www.cei.org/gencon/003,06028.cfm |archive-date=2007-10-09 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


After ] published its 2022 update to annual average temperature data,<ref>{{cite web |title=Annual 2022 Climate Report |url=https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202213 |publisher=] |access-date=2023-01-18 |archive-date=2023-01-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230118015631/https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202213 |url-status=live }}</ref> Milloy tweeted 8 years of data and claimed "CO2 warming is a hoax."<ref>{{cite tweet |user=JunkScience |number=1613724250011242497 |title=NOAA makes it official}}</ref> An Associated Press fact-checking article said the conclusion was false, saying "Social media users are misrepresenting a small portion of a graph from NOAA to support the erroneous claim that global temperatures are falling rather than rising, meaning global warming is not real."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Tulp |first=Sophia |date=January 19, 2023 |title=Temperature graph misrepresented to deny climate change |url=https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-misleading-climate-change-graph-418146648172 |access-date=2023-01-20 |work=] |language=en |archive-date=2023-01-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120004410/https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-misleading-climate-change-graph-418146648172 |url-status=live }}</ref>
===U.S. Surgeon General===


===Abolition of position of U.S. Surgeon General===
In 1998, Milloy, writing on behalf of TASSC, co-wrote an article which called for the abolition of the position of ]. "We have not had a surgeon general for three years. Has anyone noticed? Is anyone's health at risk," asked the authors.<ref>, The Wall Street Journal, 10 February, 1998</ref><ref></ref>
In 1998, Milloy, writing on behalf of TASSC, co-wrote an article which called for the abolition of the position of ]. "We have not had a surgeon general for three years. Has anyone noticed? Is anyone's health at risk?"<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184419/http://www.junkscience.com/news/sgoped.html |date=2007-09-30 }}, The Wall Street Journal, 10 February 1998</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.ncpa.org/pd/budget/feb98d.html |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20061203112904/http://www.ncpa.org/pd/budget/feb98d.html |url-status=dead |title=NCPA Idea House: ''Who Needs A Surgeon General?''|archivedate=December 3, 2006}}</ref>


===DDT=== ===DDT===
Critics have argued that Milloy holds ] "responsible for more deaths than malaria has caused in total,"<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001122907/http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3186 |date=2007-10-01 }}, ], ''Extra!'', September/October 2007.</ref>
Milloy has campaigned against the 1972 ban on non-public-health uses of ] in the United States and in favour of wider use of DDT against ], which he claims could be largely eliminated if DDT were used more aggressively. He has been particularly critical of ], who, he wrote, "misrepresented the existing science on bird reproduction and was wrong about DDT causing cancer."<ref>, July 28, 2000</ref>


In 2006, following a press release by the ] recommending more extensive use of indoor residual spraying with DDT and other pesticides, Milloy wrote, "It’s a relief that the WHO has finally come to its senses."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070623050255/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,215084,00.html |date=2007-06-23 }}, Thursday, September 21, 2006</ref> In 2007, the WHO clarified its position, saying it is "very much concerned with health consequences from use of DDT" and reaffirmed its commitment to phasing out the use of DDT.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.who.int/ipcs/capacity_building/COP3_update.pdf |title=Update for COP3 on WHO activities relevant to country implementation of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants |website=] |date=April 2007 |access-date=2020-10-05 |archive-date=2021-12-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211208211708/https://www.who.int/ipcs/capacity_building/COP3_update.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
Milloy's junkscience.com web site features ''The Malaria Clock: A Green Eco-Imperialist Legacy of Death'',<ref name="malariaclock"></ref> which he claims counts up the approximate number of new malaria cases and deaths in the world, most of which he says could have been prevented by the use of DDT. {{As of|2007|06}}, Milloy's clock stands at more than 94 million dead, 90% of whom are said to have been expectant mothers and children under five years of age. "Infanticide on this scale appears without parallel in human history," writes Milloy. "This is not ecology. This is not conservation. This is genocide."

Critics have argued that the clock holds Carson "responsible for more deaths than malaria has caused in total,"<ref>, Aaron Swartz, ''Extra!'', September/October 2007.</ref> a charge that a footnote at the bottom of the malaria clock webpage seems to acknowledge, stating: "Note that some of these cases would have occurred irrespective of DDT use. Note also that, while enormously influential, the US ban did not immediately terminate global DDT use and that developing world malaria mortality increased over time rather than instantly leaping to the estimated value of 2,700,000 deaths per year. However, certain in the knowledge that even one human sacrificed on the altar of green misanthropy is infinitely too many, I let stand the linear extrapolation of numbers from an instant start on the 1st of the month following this murderous ban."<ref name="malariaclock"/>

In 2006, following a press release by the ] recommending more extensive use of indoor residual spraying with DDT and other pesticides, Milloy wrote, "It’s a relief that the WHO has finally come to its senses."<ref>, Thursday, September 21, 2006</ref> In 2007, the WHO clarified its position, saying it is "very much concerned with health consequences from use of DDT" and reaffirmed its commitment to phasing out the use of DDT.<ref>http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_56180.shtml</ref>{{rs}}


===Asbestos and the World Trade Center=== ===Asbestos and the World Trade Center===
On September 14, 2001, three days after ] destroyed the ], Milloy wrote that the World Trade Center towers might have stood longer, preventing many casualties, had the use of ] fire-resistant lagging not been discontinued during the Towers' construction.<ref name="junksciwtc">, FoxNews.com. Published September 14, 2001.</ref>


Advocates for banning asbestos were highly critical of the article,<ref name="junksciwtc"/> questioning his motives and disputing his conclusions. The International Ban Asbestos Secretariat charged him with "insensitivity that is hard to fathom."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.btinternet.com/~ibas/lka_science_not_as_we_know.htm#3 |title=Criticism of Milloy's comments by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat. |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120630225104/http://www.btinternet.com/~ibas/lka_science_not_as_we_know.htm#3 |archive-date=2012-06-30 |url-status=dead }} Accessed 11 October 2006.{{dead link|date=November 2012|bot=Legobot}}</ref>
On September 14, 2001, three days after ] destroyed the ], Milloy wrote that the World Trade Center towers might have stood longer, preventing many casualties, had the use of ] fire-resistant lagging not been discontinued during the Towers' construction.<ref name="junksciwtc">, FoxNews.com. Published September 14, 2001.</ref> Milloy's article reported that, ''"In 1971, New York City banned the use of asbestos in spray fireproofing. At that time, asbestos insulating material had only been sprayed up to the 64th floor of the World Trade Center towers,"'' and cited an expert who questioned the efficacy of the asbestos-free lagging that was used on the steel in the upper floors.

Advocates for banning asbestos were highly critical of the article,<ref name="junksciwtc"/> questioning his motives and disputing his conclusions. The International Ban Asbestos Secretariat charged him with "insensitivity that is hard to fathom."<ref> Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>

Laurie Kazan-Allen of the Secretariat wrote:

<blockquote>It takes a certain kind of person to capitalize on a human catastrophe such as the attacks on the World Trade Centre. While the rest of us remained desperate for news, some were plotting how these events could be used to maximum advantage. ... The fact that Milloy chose to make this and other such statements as ground zero was still smouldering shows an insensitivity that is hard to fathom. What decent human being could do anything during those early days but watch and wait as the emergency services worked 24/7 to locate survivors?<ref> Accessed 16 October 2006.</ref></blockquote>


===Food safety=== ===Food safety===
Responding to criticism of the ] of the food product ] by the ] (CSPI), Milloy accused CSPI of having an undisclosed relationship with Quorn's main competitor, ]. Writing for FoxNews.com, Milloy said that "CSPI appears to have an unsavory relationship with Quorn competitor, Gardenburger" and called the CSPI's complaints "unscrupulous shrieking", noting comments in CSPI newsletters like "Remember the ] and the E.coli bacteria that could be hiding inside ? You can keep the taste but forget the worries with Gardenburger."<ref name="undue">{{cite web| url=http://www.undueinfluence.com/milloy.htm| title=Quorn & CSPI: The Other Fake Meat| publisher=]| date=2002-08-30| author=Steven Milloy| access-date=2006-05-20| url-status=dead| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060511210047/http://www.undueinfluence.com/milloy.htm| archive-date=2006-05-11}}</ref>
Responding to criticism of the safety of the food product ] by the
] (CSPI), Milloy accused CSPI of having an undisclosed relationship with Quorn's main competitor, ]. Writing for FoxNews.com, Milloy said that "CSPI appears to have an unsavory relationship with Quorn competitor, Gardenburger" and called the CSPI's complaints "unscrupulous shrieking", noting comments in CSPI newsletters like "Remember the saturated fat and the E.coli bacteria that could be hiding inside ? You can keep the taste but forget the worries with Gardenburger."<ref name="undue">{{cite web| url=http://www.undueinfluence.com/milloy.htm| title=Quorn & CSPI: The Other Fake Meat| publisher='']''| date=2002-08-30| author=Steven Milloy| accessdate=2006-05-20}}</ref> Gardenburger denied Milloy's accusation, stating that Milloy's allegation of an "unsavory relationship" was "untrue and groundless".<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.eskimo.com/~rarnold/Scott%20rebuttal.htm | title=Gardenburger rebuttal to: "The Other Fake Meat" by Steven Milloy| author=Scott C. Wallace, CEO of Gardenburger| accessdate=2006-05-20}}</ref>

===Evolution===
Milloy's views on ] are as follows:

{{quote|Explanations of human evolution are not likely to move beyond the stage of ] or conjecture. There is no scientific way — i.e., no experiment or other means of reliable study — for explaining how humans developed. Without a valid scientific method for proving a hypothesis, no indisputable explanation can exist.

The process of evolution can be scientifically demonstrated in some lower life forms, but this is a far cry from explaining how humans developed.

That said, some sort of evolutionary process seems most likely in my opinion. But there will probably always be enough uncertainty in any explanation of human evolution to give critics plenty of room for doubt.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.cato.org/askourscholars/milloy/milloy-020115-2.html | title=Q and A With Steve Milloy| author=Steve Milloy| accessdate=2007-01-11}}</ref>}}


===Rall controversy=== ===Rall controversy===
In 1999, ], a prominent ], died in a car accident. ], at the time a Cato adjunct scholar, celebrated Rall's death on his site junkscience.com, writing: "Scratch one junk scientist who promoted the bankrupt idea that poisoning rats with a chemical predicts cancer in humans exposed to much lower levels of the chemical{{ndash}} a notion that, at the very least, has wasted billions and billions of public and private dollars." Cato Institute President Edward Crane called Milloy's attack an "inexcusable lapse in judgment and civility," but Milloy refused to apologize. He retained his position with Cato until the end of 2005. <ref>Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, , ''Washington Post'', October 12, 1999, p. A17</ref> In 1999, ], a prominent ], died in a car accident. Steven Milloy, at the time a Cato adjunct scholar, commented: "Scratch one junk scientist....". Cato Institute President Edward Crane called Milloy's comments an "inexcusable lapse in judgment and civility," but Milloy refused to apologize.<ref>Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181102091626/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/feed/a46952-1999oct12.htm |date=2018-11-02 }}, ''Washington Post'', October 12, 1999, p. A17</ref>


==Registration as a lobbyist== ==Registration as a lobbyist==
The ] Lobby Filing Disclosure Program lists Milloy as a registered ] for the ] for the years 1998–2000.<ref name="sopr">, accessed 28 June 2006.</ref>{{deadlink}} The guidebook ''Washington Representatives'' also listed him as a lobbyist for the EOP Group in 1996.<ref>''Washington Lobbyists'', 1996, Columbia Books, Washington DC.</ref> The EOP Group's clients include the American Crop Protection Association (pesticides), the Chlorine Chemistry Council, ] (fossil and nuclear energy), Fort Howard Corp. (a paper manufacturer) and the ]. Milloy himself was personally registered as a lobbyist for ] and the International Food Additives Council. The ] Lobby Filing Disclosure Program lists Milloy as a registered ] for the EOP Group for the years 1998–2000.<ref name="sopr">, accessed 28 June 2006. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050123004011/http://sopr.senate.gov/cgi-win/m_opr_viewer.exe?DoFn=3&LOB=MILLOY,%20STEVE&LOBQUAL== |date=January 23, 2005 }}</ref> The guidebook ''Washington Representatives'' also listed him as a lobbyist for the EOP Group in 1996.<ref>''Washington Lobbyists'', 1996, Columbia Books, Washington DC.</ref>
Milloy denies ever lobbying, and in a 1998 email response to his registration as a lobbyist under EOP he wrote:
{{Quote|I do not lobby for ANYONE. Before I became executive director of TASSC, I did some technical consulting for a D.C. firm which had the policy of registering all its employees and consultants as lobbyists (whether or not they lobbied) pursuant to a new law passed in 1995. I am aware of the listing and have asked it to be corrected since I no longer work for that firm.<ref> Stewart Fist ] College of Sciences.</ref>}}

An article in ] praising him as a crusader for ] states that "He was employed as a lobbyist during George H.W. Bush’s term in office, trying to convince the President to sign an executive order that would bring some reason and structure to the EPA’s haphazard risk assessment process."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://frontpagemag.com/2010/01/05/the-heretics-steve-milloy-by-rich-trzupek/|title=The Heretics: Steve Milloy|last=Trzupek|first=Rich|date=January 5, 2010|publisher=FrontPage Magazine|accessdate=5 January 2010}}</ref>


==Corporate activism== ==Corporate activism==
Milloy and former tobacco executive Tom Borelli ran a ] called the ] (FEAF). The fund criticised companies that voluntarily adopt higher environmental standards. Through the platform of the FEAF, Milloy has criticized a number of other corporations for adopting environmental initiatives:
* The FEAF criticized ] for abandoning the use of ] in its packing materials.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061024175438/http://www.freeenterpriseactionfund.com/release121305.htm |date=2006-10-24 }} Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>
* Milloy accused the ], a pro-business organization of ], of being "silent about current threats to business", adding, "Last September, we warned 18 member company CEOs participating in the BRT’s 'sustainable growth' initiative to stop wasting corporate resources."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061024175430/http://www.freeenterpriseactionfund.com/release111005.htm |date=2006-10-24 }} Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>
* Milloy and Borelli argued that ] is harming its shareholders by launching a program to curtail ]. They also accused G.E. of ignoring the input of ]ist groups such as the ] and the ] in forming their environmental policy.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061017182107/http://www.freeenterpriseactionfund.com/release050206.htm |date=2006-10-17 }}, FreeEnterpriseActionFund.com. Accessed October 11, 2006.</ref>


FEAF was criticized by investment analyst Chuck Jaffe as being "an advocacy group in search of assets." Jaffe concludes, "Strip away the rhetoric, and you're getting a very expensive, underperforming ], while Milloy and his partner Thomas Borelli get a platform for raising their pet issues."<ref>, BostonHerald.com. January 24, 2006. Accessed October 11, 2006. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060308231250/http://business.bostonherald.com/businessNews/view.bg?articleid=122681 |date=March 8, 2006 }}</ref>
Milloy and former tobacco executive Tom Borelli run a ] called the ] (FEAF). The fund has criticised companies that voluntarily adopt high environmental standards. Through the platform of the FEAF, Milloy has criticized a number of other corporations for adopting environmental initiatives:
* The FEAF criticized ] for abandoning the use of ] in its packing materials.<ref> Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>
* Milloy accused the ], a pro-business organization of ], of being "silent about current threats to business", adding, "Last September, we warned 18 member company CEOs participating in the BRT’s 'sustainable growth' initiative to stop wasting corporate resources."<ref> Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>
* Milloy and Borelli argued that ] is harming its shareholders by launching a program to curtail ] emissions. They also accused G.E. of ignoring the input of ] groups such as the ] and the ] in forming their environmental policy.<ref> Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>


Similarly, ], in a '']'' magazine article, wrote that FEAF "seems to be a ] masquerading as a ]." He noted that Milloy and Tom Borelli, the former head of corporate scientific affairs for Philip Morris, lack any ] experience, also noting FEAF had badly underperformed the ] during its first 10 months of existence. Gross concluded that, "... in the short term, it looks like Borelli and Milloy are essentially paying the fund for the privilege of using it as a platform to broadcast their views on corporate governance, global warming, and a host of other issues."<ref name="slate"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061127082432/http://www.slate.com/id/2140997/ |date=2006-11-27 }}, Slate.com. May 4, 2006. Accessed October 11, 2006.</ref>
FEAF has been criticised by investment analyst Chuck Jaffe as being "an advocacy group in search of assets." Jaffe concludes "Strip away the rhetoric, and you’re getting a very expensive, underperforming ], while Milloy and his partner Thomas Borelli get a platform for raising their pet issues."<ref> Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>

Similarly, Daniel Gross, in a '']'' magazine article, wrote that FEAF "seems to be a ] masquerading as a ]." Gross noted that Milloy and Tom Borelli, the former head of corporate scientific affairs for Philip Morris, lack any ] experience; he also noted that FEAF had badly underperformed the ] during its first 10 months of existence. Gross concluded that "...in the short term, it looks like Borelli and Milloy are essentially paying the fund for the privilege of using it as a platform to broadcast their views on corporate governance, global warming, and a host of other issues."<ref name="slate"> Accessed 11 October 2006.</ref>

==Responses==
Milloy and Borelli have defended Exxon against criticism for funding global warming sceptics and others, though without declaring their own financial interest. In September 2006, Milloy's Junkscience.com site reproduced the following excerpt of a piece by Borelli published in Townhall.com, criticising the British ]:

{{Quote|Battle for the boardroom — After over 200 years of independence, the British are still trying to direct U.S. public policy. The Royal Society — the British equivalent of the National Academy of Sciences — recently admonished Exxon Mobil for supporting organizations that question the link between man-made greenhouse gas emissions and global warming.

Notwithstanding the offensive nature of a prestigious organization attempting to silence scientific debate, the Royal Society’s letter sheds light on the larger effort employed by agents of the Left to shut-down corporate support for pro-growth political organizations, politicians and policies. By cutting-off the financial supply lines for free-market thought and policies, these agents — labor unions, NGOs, the media — hope to dominate public debate and control public opinion. As these tactics continue to meet with success, liberal policies and politicians will gain a huge strategic advantage.

For those of us interested in promoting pro-growth ideas, loss of corporate support represents a huge threat to sound public policy. There is too much money, power and influence wielded by companies and free-market advocates can’t afford to give up that high ground to the Left.<ref> Accessed 17 October 2006.</ref>}}


==Books== ==Books==
* {{cite book |last=Milloy |first=Steven J. |title=Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA |year=2016 |publisher=Bench Press |isbn=978-0998259710}}

* ''Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them'', ], 2009, {{ISBN|978-1-59698-585-8}}
Milloy has written five books:
* ''Junk Science Judo: Self-defense Against Health Scares and Scams'', ], 2001, {{ISBN|1-930865-12-0}}

* ''Silencing Science'', ], 1999, {{ISBN|1-882577-72-8}} (with Michael Gough)
*''Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them'', ], 2009, ISBN 9781596985858
*''Junk Science Judo: Self-defense Against Health Scares and Scams'', ], 2001, ISBN 1930865120 * ''Science Without Sense: The Risky Business of Public Health Research'', ], 1996, {{ISBN|1-882577-34-5}}
* {{cite book |first1=Michael |last1=Gough |first2=Steven J. |last2=Milloy |title=EPA's cancer risk guidelines : guidance to nowhere |year=1996 |publisher=] |oclc=36235006}}
*''Silencing Science'', ], 1999, ISBN 1882577728 (with Michael Gough)
*''Science Without Sense: The Risky Business of Public Health Research'', ], 1996, ISBN 1882577345 * ''Science-Based Risk Assessment: A Piece of the Superfund Puzzle'', National Environmental Policy Institute, 1995, {{ISBN|0-9647463-0-1}}
*''Science-Based Risk Assessment: A Piece of the Superfund Puzzle'', ], 1995, ISBN 0964746301

Milloy's junkscience.com site lists positive comments, derived from prepublication reviews of his books ''Silencing Science'' and ''Junk Science Judo'', published on the back cover (]) of those books. Those cited on junkscience.com are the late ], editor of ] from 1962 to 1984, and ], Dean of the ] from 1977 to 1990. Abelson's review states "Milloy is one of a small group who devotes time, energy and intelligence to the defense of the truth of science."

Others with favorable reviews cited in the blurb of ''Junk Science Judo'' are ], ] and ].

==Notes==
{{reflist|2}}


==See also== ==See also==
*] *]
*] *]
*]

==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}


==External links== ==External links==
* {{C-SPAN|1004560}}
===Milloy's Websites===
*


===Milloy's websites===
*
*
*{{cite web |url=http://ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/ |title=The Ultimate Global Warming Challenge |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210421145717/https://ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/ |archive-date=2021-04-21}}


===Tobacco Document Archives=== ===Tobacco document archives===
* at the ]. * at the ].
* *
{{Authority control}}




{{DEFAULTSORT:Milloy, Steven}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Milloy, Steven}}
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]

Latest revision as of 11:50, 20 December 2024

American lobbyist and commentator
This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Misplaced Pages editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (July 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Steven J. Milloy is a lawyer, lobbyist, author and former Fox News commentator. Milloy is the founder and editor of the blog junkscience.com.

Milloy's career has been spent denying the results of science that government agencies rely on for protecting the public. His close financial and organizational ties to tobacco and oil companies have been the subject of criticism, as Milloy has consistently disputed the scientific consensus on climate change and the health risks of second-hand smoke.

From the 1990s until the end of 2005, Milloy was an adjunct scholar at the libertarian Cato Institute, which hosted the JunkScience.com site. He was an adjunct scholar at the Competitive Enterprise Institute from 2005 to 2009.

He operated The Advancement of Sound Science Center (TASSC) established by Philip Morris Companies Inc. to counter legislation against second-hand smoke.

Since 2020 Milloy has served on the board of the Heartland Institute. As of 2023 Milloy is a Senior Policy Fellow with the Energy & Environment Legal Institute.

Education

Milloy holds a B.A. in Natural Sciences from Johns Hopkins University, a Master of Health Sciences in Biostatistics from the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, a Juris Doctor from the University of Baltimore, and a Master of Laws from the Georgetown University Law Center.

Career

The National Environmental Policy Institute (NEPI) was formed in early 1993 by Congressmen Don Ritter (R-PA) and Dennis Hertel (D-MI).

Most of the initial funding for this 'greenwash' lobby group came from Occidental Petroleum and other oil companies. Milloy styled himself as the National Environmental Policy Institute's Director of Science Policy Studies. NEPI's publication, Science-Based Risk Assessment: A Key to the Superfund Puzzle, says: "Sound science and more accurate risk assessments can significantly reduce the costs of remediation, while reducing real health risks when they are found. ... Milloy of the NEPI suggests that the costs of cleanups would fall by 60 percent if the program focused more directly on risk when identifying the appropriate remedies."

At the same time, Milloy was working through Philip Morris's specialist-science/PR company APCO & Associates, but was relegated to working behind the scenes as a contact for the newly formed TASSC, and on developing a new electronic-mail/computer business venture known as "Issues Watch" for APCO. APCO formally established TASSC on October 1, 1993. The budget for the first full year of operation was $365,411.

By 1994, according to his website, Milloy was project leader of the Regulatory Impact Analysis Project, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy. The Cato Institute, where he was listed as an adjunct scholar, published his work from 1995 to 2005. Milloy began his opposition to what he called "junk science" as president of the Environmental Policy Analysis Network in 1996.

Milloy's employment by the EOP Group Inc. (major lobbyists) dates back to before 1995, and it includes a record of lobbying on behalf of the Fort Howard Corporation, the International Food Additives Council, Monsanto Co. and Edison Electrics. The Competitive Enterprise Institute also proposed to Philip Morris that Milloy and his partners Michael Gough and Michael Fumento should be used to attack the FDA through reports to the House and Senate on risk Management reform.

In March 1997, Milloy moved from the backroom to become president of The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (TASSC) , which later became The Advancement of Sound Science Center.

He has links through Philip Morris and Fox News to Rupert Murdoch and News Corporation. He was a correspondent for Fox News between 2002 and 2009, and he became a policy director at Murray Energy and a member of Donald Trump's first presidential transition team.

Junk science

Milloy is the founder and editor of the blog junkscience.com.

Milloy has used the term "junk science" in public debate, which he defines as "faulty scientific data and analysis used to advance special and, often, hidden agendas." David Michaels has argued the term is used, by Milloy and others, almost exclusively to "denigrate scientists and studies whose findings do not serve the corporate cause".

In an editorial in Chemical & Engineering News, Editor-in-Chief Rudy Baum called Milloy's junkscience.com website "the best known" example of "a right wing effort in the U.S. to discredit widely accepted science, technology and medical information." An editorial in the American Journal of Public Health noted that "... attacking the science underlying difficult public policy decisions with the label of 'junk' has become a common ploy for those opposed to regulation ... One need only peruse JunkScience.com to get a sense of the long list of public health issues for which research has been so labeled."

Second-hand smoke

Milloy has opposed legitimate research linking second-hand tobacco smoke to cancer, falsely claiming that "the vast majority of studies reported no statistical association."

In 1993, Milloy dismissed an Environmental Protection Agency report linking second-hand tobacco smoke to cancer as "a joke." Five years later Milloy claimed vindication after a federal court contradicted the E.P.A.'s conclusions. However, the court's finding against the EPA was overturned on appeal. When the British Medical Journal published a meta-analysis confirming a link in 1997, Milloy misrepresenting the study wrote, "Of the 37 studies, only 7—less than 19 percent—reported statistically significant increases in lung cancer incidence... Meta-analysis of the secondhand smoke studies was a joke when EPA did it in 1993. And it remains a joke today." When another researcher published a study linking second-hand smoke to cancer, Milloy wrote that she "... must have pictures of journal editors in compromising positions with farm animals. How else can you explain her studies seeing the light of day?"

Links to tobacco industry

While at FoxNews.com, Milloy has continued to attack the scientific consensus that second-hand tobacco smoke causes cancer. However, with the release of confidential tobacco industry documents as part of the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement, the objectivity of Milloy's stance on second-hand smoke has been questioned. Based on this documentation, journalists Paul D. Thacker and George Monbiot, as well as the Union of Concerned Scientists and others, have contended that Milloy is a paid advocate for the tobacco industry.

Milloy's junkscience.com website was reviewed and revised by a public relations firm hired by the R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. A 1994 Philip Morris memo listed TASSC among its "Tools to Affect Legislative Decisions". According to its 1997 annual report, TASSC "sponsored" junkscience.com.

The New Republic reported that Milloy, who is presented by Fox News as an independent journalist, was under contract to provide consulting services to Philip Morris through the end of 2005. In 2000 and 2001, for example, Milloy received a total of $180,000 in payments from Philip Morris for consulting services. A spokesperson for Fox News stated, "Fox News was unaware of Milloy's connection with Philip Morris. Any affiliation he had should have been disclosed."

Climate change

See also: climate change denial

Milloy claims that human activity has little impact on climate change, denying the scientific consensus on climate change, and that regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions are unwarranted and harmful to business interests. He offered a prize of $500,000 to anyone who can "prove, in a scientific manner, that humans are causing harmful global warming", stating that "JunkScience.com, in its sole discretion, will determine the winner, if any."

In 2004, when the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment was released by the Arctic Council and the International Arctic Science Committee, Milloy wrote that the report "pretty much debunks itself." Milloy based his assertions that the variation was natural on his interpretation of just one graph from the overview of the large study. One of the lead authors of the study, oceanographer James J. McCarthy, commented that those taking Milloy's position would "have to refute what are hundreds of scientific papers that reconstruct various pieces of this climate puzzle." Milloy's assertion was repeated by lobbyists including the Competitive Enterprise Institute

In 2005, it was reported that non-profit organizations operating out of Milloy's home, and in some cases employing no staff, have received large payments from ExxonMobil during his tenure with Fox News. A Fox News spokesperson stated that Milloy is "... affiliated with several not-for-profit groups that possibly may receive funding from Exxon, but he certainly does not receive funding directly from Exxon."

A Competitive Enterprise Institute press release says Milloy "coordinated" a climate change denial action at the 2007 Live Earth concert in New York, where activists campaigned among the attendees and a plane circled the event pulling a banner reading, "DON’T BELIEVE AL GORE — DEMAND DEBATE.COM."

After NOAA published its 2022 update to annual average temperature data, Milloy tweeted 8 years of data and claimed "CO2 warming is a hoax." An Associated Press fact-checking article said the conclusion was false, saying "Social media users are misrepresenting a small portion of a graph from NOAA to support the erroneous claim that global temperatures are falling rather than rising, meaning global warming is not real."

Abolition of position of U.S. Surgeon General

In 1998, Milloy, writing on behalf of TASSC, co-wrote an article which called for the abolition of the position of United States Surgeon General. "We have not had a surgeon general for three years. Has anyone noticed? Is anyone's health at risk?"

DDT

Critics have argued that Milloy holds Rachel Carson "responsible for more deaths than malaria has caused in total,"

In 2006, following a press release by the World Health Organization recommending more extensive use of indoor residual spraying with DDT and other pesticides, Milloy wrote, "It’s a relief that the WHO has finally come to its senses." In 2007, the WHO clarified its position, saying it is "very much concerned with health consequences from use of DDT" and reaffirmed its commitment to phasing out the use of DDT.

Asbestos and the World Trade Center

On September 14, 2001, three days after terrorist attacks destroyed the World Trade Center, Milloy wrote that the World Trade Center towers might have stood longer, preventing many casualties, had the use of asbestos fire-resistant lagging not been discontinued during the Towers' construction.

Advocates for banning asbestos were highly critical of the article, questioning his motives and disputing his conclusions. The International Ban Asbestos Secretariat charged him with "insensitivity that is hard to fathom."

Food safety

Responding to criticism of the safety of the food product Quorn by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), Milloy accused CSPI of having an undisclosed relationship with Quorn's main competitor, Gardenburger. Writing for FoxNews.com, Milloy said that "CSPI appears to have an unsavory relationship with Quorn competitor, Gardenburger" and called the CSPI's complaints "unscrupulous shrieking", noting comments in CSPI newsletters like "Remember the saturated fat and the E.coli bacteria that could be hiding inside ? You can keep the taste but forget the worries with Gardenburger."

Rall controversy

In 1999, David Platt Rall, a prominent environmental scientist, died in a car accident. Steven Milloy, at the time a Cato adjunct scholar, commented: "Scratch one junk scientist....". Cato Institute President Edward Crane called Milloy's comments an "inexcusable lapse in judgment and civility," but Milloy refused to apologize.

Registration as a lobbyist

The United States Senate Lobby Filing Disclosure Program lists Milloy as a registered lobbyist for the EOP Group for the years 1998–2000. The guidebook Washington Representatives also listed him as a lobbyist for the EOP Group in 1996.

Corporate activism

Milloy and former tobacco executive Tom Borelli ran a mutual fund called the Free Enterprise Action Fund (FEAF). The fund criticised companies that voluntarily adopt higher environmental standards. Through the platform of the FEAF, Milloy has criticized a number of other corporations for adopting environmental initiatives:

FEAF was criticized by investment analyst Chuck Jaffe as being "an advocacy group in search of assets." Jaffe concludes, "Strip away the rhetoric, and you're getting a very expensive, underperforming index fund, while Milloy and his partner Thomas Borelli get a platform for raising their pet issues."

Similarly, Daniel Gross, in a Slate magazine article, wrote that FEAF "seems to be a lobbying enterprise masquerading as a mutual fund." He noted that Milloy and Tom Borelli, the former head of corporate scientific affairs for Philip Morris, lack any money management experience, also noting FEAF had badly underperformed the S&P 500 during its first 10 months of existence. Gross concluded that, "... in the short term, it looks like Borelli and Milloy are essentially paying the fund for the privilege of using it as a platform to broadcast their views on corporate governance, global warming, and a host of other issues."

Books

See also

Notes

  1. Waldman, Scott (June 12, 2018). "Steve Milloy doesn't like 'climate bedwetters'". E&E News. Archived from the original on 2023-01-22. Retrieved 2023-01-22.
  2. ^ Mooney, Chris (May 2005). "Some Like It Hot". Mother Jones. Retrieved 2013-01-22. {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  3. ^ Thacker, Paul D. (January 27, 2006). "Smoked Out: Pundit For Hire". The New Republic. The New Republic. p. 1. Archived from the original on July 19, 2006. Retrieved July 23, 2010. Reprinted at freepress.net.
  4. "Steven J. Milloy". Competitive Enterprise Institute. Archived from the original on 2023-01-20. Retrieved 2023-01-20.
  5. Milloy, Steve (January 7, 1998). Annual Report - 1997 (Report). The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition. Archived from the original on June 14, 2011. Retrieved July 7, 2007. Document accessed at Legacy Tobacco Documents Library Archived 2015-06-23 at the Wayback Machine
  6. "Steven Milloy: publisher, junkscience.com". heartland.org. Archived from the original on 2023-01-22. Retrieved 2023-01-22.
  7. "Fellows & Advisors". E&E Legal. Archived from the original on 2023-03-01. Retrieved 2023-03-01.
  8. Eldridge, Nate (12 September 2017). "Does Steven Milloy hold the degrees he claims?". Stack Exchange. Archived from the original on 24 July 2023. Retrieved 17 September 2017.
  9. Milloy's history and C.V., from his website junkscience.com Archived 2017-09-17 at the Wayback Machine, accessed 16 Sept 2017. Section "Education".
  10. Documents Archived 2023-07-24 at the Wayback Machine, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.
  11. Industry Documents Library, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.
  12. Industry Documents Library Archived 2010-12-04 at the Wayback Machine, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.
  13. Industry Documents Library Archived 2023-07-24 at the Wayback Machine, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.
  14. Industry Documents Library Archived 2023-07-24 at the Wayback Machine, legacy.library.ucsf.edu. Accessed September 7, 2022.
  15. "The junkman climbs to the top". Archived from the original on 2005-06-20. Retrieved 2017-08-07.
  16. Davenport, Coral (April 12, 2017). "Scott Pruitt Faces Anger from Right over E.P.A. Finding He Won't Fight". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2017. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  17. Rampton, Sheldon; Stauber, John (2000). "How Big Tobacco Helped Create "the Junkman"" (PDF). PR Watch. Vol. 7, no. 3. Center for Media and Democracy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-07-25.
  18. "Who is Steve Milloy?". junkscience.com. Archived from the original on 2023-01-22. Retrieved 2023-01-22.
  19. Michaels, David (2008). Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-19-530067-3.
  20. Baum, Rudy (June 9, 2008). "Defending Science". Chemical and Engineering News. 86 (37): 5. doi:10.1021/cen-v086n023.p005. Archived from the original on June 9, 2008. Retrieved June 11, 2008.
  21. Samet JM, Burke TA (2001). "Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking". American Journal of Public Health. 91 (11): 1742–4. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1742. PMC 1446866. PMID 11684591.
  22. Ong EK, Glantz SA (2001). "Constructing "Sound Science" and "Good Epidemiology": Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms". Am J Public Health. 91 (11): 1749–57. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749. PMC 1446868. PMID 11684593.
  23. Secondhand Smokescreen, Archived 2007-09-30 at the Wayback Machine By Steven Milloy, March 9, 2001
  24. ^ IARC 2004 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFIARC2004 (help) "There is sufficient evidence that involuntary smoking (exposure to secondhand or 'environmental' tobacco smoke) causes lung cancer in humans" Archived 2018-06-07 at the Wayback Machine
  25. Schwartz, John (1998-07-19). "Judge Faults EPA Findings on Secondhand Smoke Impact". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2023-04-15. Retrieved 2023-02-22.
  26. "Secondhand Joking, by Steven Milloy". Archived from the original on November 6, 2006.
  27. Tong, Elisa K.; Glantz, Stanton A. (16 October 2007). "Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease". Circulation. 116 (16): 1845–1854. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.715888. PMID 17938301. S2CID 4021497.
  28. Milloy, Steven. "www.junkscience.com". Archived from the original on 2010-11-25.
  29. Stauber, John; Rampton, Sheldon (July 1999). "The Junkyard Dogs of Science". New Internationalist. Oxford, England: New Internationalist Publications.
  30. Kessler 2006 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFKessler2006 (help)
  31. "Environmental Tobacco Smoke" (PDF). 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-07-16. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  32. "Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017-02-21. Archived from the original on 2021-08-21. Retrieved 2021-07-30.
  33. "Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke". U.S. National Cancer Institute. Archived from the original on 2007-09-05. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
  34. "Secondhand Smoke". American Cancer Society. Archived from the original on 2007-09-14. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  35. Activity Report, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., December 1996, describing input from R.J.R. Tobacco's P.R. firm into Milloy's junkscience website Archived 2015-01-13 at the Wayback Machine. From the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library Archived 2015-06-23 at the Wayback Machine at the University of California, San Francisco. Accessed October 5, 2006.
  36. Ong EK, Glantz SA (2000). "Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study". Lancet. 355 (9211): 1253–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5. PMID 10770318. S2CID 25145666.
  37. Philip Morris Corporate Affairs Budget Presentation, 1994 Archived 2007-07-04 at the Wayback Machine, from the Philip Morris Document Archive Archived 2020-11-12 at the Wayback Machine. Accessed October 5, 2006.
  38. Annual Report – 1997 Archived 2008-06-18 at the Wayback Machine, Steven Milloy, January 7th, 1998. Document accessed at Legacy Tobacco Documents Library Archived 2015-06-23 at the Wayback Machine on July 7, 2007.
  39. Philip Morris budget for "Strategy and Social Responsibility", detailing $180,000 in payments to Steven Milloy (pp. 13 & 66) Archived 2013-09-01 at the Wayback Machine. Accessed October 5, 2006.
  40. "Ultimate Global Warming Challenge". Archived from the original on 2021-04-21. Retrieved May 25, 2008. A Steven Milloy website.
  41. Milloy, Steven (November 12, 2004). "Polar Bear Scare on Thin Ice". Archived from the original on 2007-09-30.
  42. $40,000 to the Advancement of Sound Science Center and $50,000 to the Free Enterprise Action Institute. Both organizations were registered to Milloy's home address. source: Some Like It Hot Archived 2011-08-25 at the Wayback Machine, motherjones.com . May/June 2005
  43. "Bureaucrash and the "Demand Debate" Campaign Crash Live Earth New York" (Press release). Competitive Enterprise Institute. July 9, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-10-09.
  44. "Annual 2022 Climate Report". National Centers for Environmental Information. Archived from the original on 2023-01-18. Retrieved 2023-01-18.
  45. @JunkScience (January 13, 2023). "NOAA makes it official" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  46. Tulp, Sophia (January 19, 2023). "Temperature graph misrepresented to deny climate change". AP NEWS. Archived from the original on 2023-01-20. Retrieved 2023-01-20.
  47. An Empty Uniform, by Michael Gough and Steven Milloy Archived 2007-09-30 at the Wayback Machine, The Wall Street Journal, 10 February 1998
  48. "NCPA Idea House: Who Needs A Surgeon General?". Archived from the original on December 3, 2006.
  49. Rachel Carson, Mass Murderer? The creation of an anti-environmental myth Archived 2007-10-01 at the Wayback Machine, Aaron Swartz, Extra!, September/October 2007.
  50. Day of Reckoning for DDT Foes?, by Steven Milloy, FoxNews.com Archived 2007-06-23 at the Wayback Machine, Thursday, September 21, 2006
  51. "Update for COP3 on WHO activities relevant to country implementation of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants" (PDF). World Health Organization. April 2007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-12-08. Retrieved 2020-10-05.
  52. ^ Article: Asbestos Could Have Saved WTC Lives, FoxNews.com. Published September 14, 2001.
  53. "Criticism of Milloy's comments by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat". Archived from the original on 2012-06-30. Accessed 11 October 2006.
  54. Steven Milloy (2002-08-30). "Quorn & CSPI: The Other Fake Meat". Fox News. Archived from the original on 2006-05-11. Retrieved 2006-05-20.
  55. Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, "The Ideas Industry" Archived 2018-11-02 at the Wayback Machine, Washington Post, October 12, 1999, p. A17
  56. United States Senate Lobby Filing Disclosure Program, listing Milloy as a lobbyist for the EOP Group from 1998–2000, accessed 28 June 2006. Archived January 23, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  57. Washington Lobbyists, 1996, Columbia Books, Washington DC.
  58. Free Enterprise Action Fund press release, criticizing Microsoft for abandoning the use of PVC in its packing materials. Archived 2006-10-24 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 11 October 2006.
  59. Free Enterprise Action Fund press release chastising the Business Roundtable for insufficient vigilance in the defense of capitalism. Archived 2006-10-24 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 11 October 2006.
  60. Free Enterprise Action Fund press release criticizing General Electric's environmental policy Archived 2006-10-17 at the Wayback Machine, FreeEnterpriseActionFund.com. Accessed October 11, 2006.
  61. "Strange Bedfellows: Politics and Investment Fund", BostonHerald.com. January 24, 2006. Accessed October 11, 2006. Archived March 8, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  62. "Thank You for Investing: A very curious right-wing mutual fund" Archived 2006-11-27 at the Wayback Machine, Slate.com. May 4, 2006. Accessed October 11, 2006.

External links

Milloy's websites

Tobacco document archives

Categories: