| Revision as of 14:09, 4 August 2010 editCooperDB (talk | contribs)364 edits Keep← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:02, 8 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''speedy keep'''. Nominator indef blocked, no other delete votes ] ''(])'' 18:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}} | |||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedobear}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedobear}}</ul></div> | ||
| :{{la|Pedobear}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pedobear (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | :{{la|Pedobear}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pedobear (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}}) | ||
| :({{Find sources|Pedobear}}) | :({{Find sources|Pedobear}}) | ||
| Just another ] meme, not worthy of a seperate article and is just forumcruft. ''']''' 16:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | Just another ] meme, not worthy of a seperate article and is just forumcruft. ''']''' 16:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Incredibly Weak Keep''' – Seems to have a bit of coverage. Refs: "Pedobear, a pop-culture symbol denoting pedophilia" --] (]) 17:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | *'''Incredibly Weak Keep''' – Seems to have a bit of coverage. Refs: "Pedobear, a pop-culture symbol denoting pedophilia" --] (]) 17:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per the sources Odie5533 found. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 17:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per the sources Odie5533 found. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 17:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak keep''', not just another 4chan meme. Memes don't normally have that many 3rd party sources or reach outside of 4chan intself. Then again, not the most notable of subjects for an article. ''' |
*'''Weak keep''', not just another 4chan meme. Memes don't normally have that many 3rd party sources or reach outside of 4chan intself. Then again, not the most notable of subjects for an article. '''] ] ]''' 18:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 18:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 18:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| * '''Keep.''' - Interesting article and notability seems well documented. ] (]) 21:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | * '''Keep.''' - Interesting article and notability seems well documented. ] (]) 21:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep'''. Btw, I've added the references indicated by Odie above, as well as some content from them. --] <sup>]</sup> 02:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | * '''Keep'''. Btw, I've added the references indicated by Odie above, as well as some content from them. --] <sup>]</sup> 02:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' In current form has sufficient sources to merit own page or at the very least a merge. ] (]) 14:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' In current form has sufficient sources to merit own page or at the very least a merge. ] (]) 14:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''', eminently notable (not to mention irresistibly adorably cute and cuddly). <b>]</b> <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 05:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Keep''', as per Tisane. ] (]) 09:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep'''. Enough coverage to pass notability. ] (]) 00:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 8 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nominator indef blocked, no other delete votes NW (Talk) 18:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Pedobear
AfDs for this article:- Pedobear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just another 4chan meme, not worthy of a seperate article and is just forumcruft. ☭FryPod 16:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Incredibly Weak Keep – Seems to have a bit of coverage. Refs: "Pedobear, a pop-culture symbol denoting pedophilia" --Odie5533 (talk) 17:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per the sources Odie5533 found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 17:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep, not just another 4chan meme. Memes don't normally have that many 3rd party sources or reach outside of 4chan intself. Then again, not the most notable of subjects for an article. Jolly Ω Janner 18:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. - Interesting article and notability seems well documented. Carrite (talk) 21:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Btw, I've added the references indicated by Odie above, as well as some content from them. --Waldir 02:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep In current form has sufficient sources to merit own page or at the very least a merge. CooperDB (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, eminently notable (not to mention irresistibly adorably cute and cuddly). Tisane /stalk 05:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, as per Tisane. 62.255.248.225 (talk) 09:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Enough coverage to pass notability. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.