Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pyotr Chaadayev: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:27, 27 August 2010 editHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 edits Quote taken from book by David Satter?: Petri, do you suggest to blacklist all authors who ever write anything about Soviet Union? And I only quoted his translation.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:39, 11 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,385,766 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Russia}}, {{WikiProject Philosophy}}. 
(22 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPBiography|living=no|class=Start|priority=Low|listas=Chaadayev, Pyotr}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Chaadayev, Pyotr|1=
{{WikiProject Russia|class=Start|importance=Mid|listas=Chaadayev, Pyotr}} {{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes|s&a-priority=}}
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=Mid|media=yes|hist=yes|sci=yes}}
{{Philosophy|class=start|philosopher=yes}} {{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=Low|philosopher=yes}}
}}


== Quote taken from book by ]? == == Quote taken from book by ]? ==
Line 12: Line 14:
:If you wanted to edit this article, you should approach the subject from a different perspective, using different sources. Most likely those sources would also give you a different ]. -- ] (]) 18:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC) :If you wanted to edit this article, you should approach the subject from a different perspective, using different sources. Most likely those sources would also give you a different ]. -- ] (]) 18:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
::BS. Topic bans have nothing to do with what Biophys (or, for that matter, anybody else) may read. Topic bans concern Misplaced Pages editing. Using David Satter as a source is perfectly acceptable as long as Biophys' editing stays within the limits of his topic ban. ] (]) 19:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC) ::BS. Topic bans have nothing to do with what Biophys (or, for that matter, anybody else) may read. Topic bans concern Misplaced Pages editing. Using David Satter as a source is perfectly acceptable as long as Biophys' editing stays within the limits of his topic ban. ] (]) 19:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
:::Yes, I certainly agree. Petri, do you suggest to blacklist all authors who ever write anything about Soviet Union? But in that case I did not even quote anything written by Satter. I only quoted his ''translation''.] (]) 23:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC) :::Yes, I certainly agree. Petri, do you suggest to blacklist all authors who ever wrote anything about the Soviet Union? But in that case I did not even quote anything written by Satter. I only quoted his ''translation''.] (]) 23:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


::::By using Satter as a source, or even reading him while reading him while editing Misplaced Pages, you are putting yourself right in the line-of-fire between ] and . Considering that the hand gun on the last page is pointed right at me, you can appreciate if I do not look too positively at your sources. -- ] (]) 00:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
*The quote was taken from the 1st Philosophical Letter of Chaadayev :
::::''P.S.'' – Now, in case you failed to understand the big picture, I will help you by connecting the dots:
:::::] → <small>stars in movie (with <b>†</b> ] and <b>†</b> ]) by </small> → ] → <small>best friend of</small> → ] ← <small>secretary of</small> ← ] → <small>main propagandist and "minister of information" of </small> → ] → <small>aligned with</small> → ].
::::-- ] (]) 01:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
:::::Once again, the source is Chaadayev who lived two hundred years ago (see below). I hope you realize that he has nothing to do with Osama bin Laden? ] (]) 01:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
:::::::The thing that most likely unites all of the people listed is that they receive (or received) direct or indirect moral or financial support from the US government for their war against the topic banned entity. That is however irrelevant, what is relevant is that they are all controversial people, whom you should avoid if you want tho abide by your topic ban. Bringing up Osama was unnecessary, I only did it because our English language readers have no idea who the others are. -- ] (]) 02:14, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
::::::<s>BTW, what you said ("DS->AN->HH->MS->Osama") was a BLP violation. Please revert yourself. </s> ] (]) 01:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
:::::::Biophys, stop responding to provocations. ] (]) 01:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
:::::::I have reliable printed sources for everything I have written. -- ] (])
:::::Petri Krohn, stop this instantly. You know perfectly well from where you are heading with this. ] (]) 01:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
::::::You are right, I should stop. I have no intention of tricking Biophys into braking his topic ban by dragging him into some discussion on Russia. I am sorry if I did that. -- ] (]) 02:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
::::::As for the circus at AE I seriously think that it was a bad idea from the start. -- ] (]) 02:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


*The quote was taken from the 1st Philosophical Letter of Chaadayev :
{{Quotation2|Но мы, можно сказать, некоторым образом — народ исключительный. Мы принадлежим к числу тех наций, которые как бы не входят в состав человечества, а существуют лишь для того, чтобы дать миру какой-нибудь важный урок.}} {{Quotation2|Но мы, можно сказать, некоторым образом — народ исключительный. Мы принадлежим к числу тех наций, которые как бы не входят в состав человечества, а существуют лишь для того, чтобы дать миру какой-нибудь важный урок.}}

As about ''translation'', it may be taken from different sources or even translated by a wikipedian. If you want to provide an alternative translation, pleased do. The quote has nothing to do with Soviet Union, quite obviously.] (]) 18:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC) As about ''translation'', it may be taken from different sources or even translated by a wikipedian. If you want to provide an alternative translation, pleased do. The quote has nothing to do with Soviet Union, quite obviously.] (]) 18:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051015122053/http://www.philosophy.ru/library/chaad/lettr/chaad1.html to http://www.philosophy.ru/library/chaad/lettr/chaad1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221145740/http://www2.unil.ch/slav/ling/textes/ChaadaevPremlettrephilo.html to http://www2.unil.ch/slav/ling/textes/ChaadaevPremlettrephilo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 22:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:39, 11 January 2024

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
WikiProject iconRussia: Science & education / History / Mass media Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the mass media in Russia task force.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophers

Quote taken from book by David Satter?

(Subtitle added by Petri Krohn, 18:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC))

What was the reason for removing the quote? It was taken from book by Satter. If you think it was out of context, I might provide more context. Thank you. Biophys (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

You should have provided a source for the quote and the translation. However, using David Satter as a source would put your edits right at the center of the dispute in the WP:EEML and WP:ARBRB arbitration cases. (See for example the section titled "The Russian Apartment Bombings" in the David Satter article.) It would therefore be against the sanctions imposed on you in the later case, see Biophys topic banned.
If you wanted to edit this article, you should approach the subject from a different perspective, using different sources. Most likely those sources would also give you a different point-of-view. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 18:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
BS. Topic bans have nothing to do with what Biophys (or, for that matter, anybody else) may read. Topic bans concern Misplaced Pages editing. Using David Satter as a source is perfectly acceptable as long as Biophys' editing stays within the limits of his topic ban. Colchicum (talk) 19:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I certainly agree. Petri, do you suggest to blacklist all authors who ever wrote anything about the Soviet Union? But in that case I did not even quote anything written by Satter. I only quoted his translation.Biophys (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
By using Satter as a source, or even reading him while reading him while editing Misplaced Pages, you are putting yourself right in the line-of-fire between this event and this death threat. Considering that the hand gun on the last page is pointed right at me, you can appreciate if I do not look too positively at your sources. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 00:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
P.S. – Now, in case you failed to understand the big picture, I will help you by connecting the dots:
David Satterstars in movie (with Alexander Litvinenko and Anna Politkovskaya) by Andrei Nekrasovbest friend ofHeidi Hautalasecretary ofMikael Storsjömain propagandist and "minister of information" of Doku Umarovaligned withOsama bin Laden.
-- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Once again, the source is Chaadayev who lived two hundred years ago (see below). I hope you realize that he has nothing to do with Osama bin Laden? Biophys (talk) 01:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
The thing that most likely unites all of the people listed is that they receive (or received) direct or indirect moral or financial support from the US government for their war against the topic banned entity. That is however irrelevant, what is relevant is that they are all controversial people, whom you should avoid if you want tho abide by your topic ban. Bringing up Osama was unnecessary, I only did it because our English language readers have no idea who the others are. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 02:14, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
BTW, what you said ("DS->AN->HH->MS->Osama") was a BLP violation. Please revert yourself. Biophys (talk) 01:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Biophys, stop responding to provocations. Colchicum (talk) 01:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
I have reliable printed sources for everything I have written. -- Petri Krohn (talk)
Petri Krohn, stop this instantly. You know perfectly well from your own experience where you are heading with this. Colchicum (talk) 01:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
You are right, I should stop. I have no intention of tricking Biophys into braking his topic ban by dragging him into some discussion on Russia. I am sorry if I did that. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 02:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
As for the circus at AE I seriously think that it was a bad idea from the start. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 02:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • The quote was taken from the 1st Philosophical Letter of Chaadayev :
Но мы, можно сказать, некоторым образом — народ исключительный. Мы принадлежим к числу тех наций, которые как бы не входят в состав человечества, а существуют лишь для того, чтобы дать миру какой-нибудь важный урок.

As about translation, it may be taken from different sources or even translated by a wikipedian. If you want to provide an alternative translation, pleased do. The quote has nothing to do with Soviet Union, quite obviously.Biophys (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pyotr Chaadayev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories: