| Revision as of 13:31, 9 September 2010 editA Quest For Knowledge (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,187 edits →New section: What's good for the goose...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:24, 1 January 2025 edit undoJJMC89 bot (talk | contribs)Bots1,162,756 edits →Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder: new section | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- {{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} --> | |||
| {{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}} | |||
| {{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} | |||
| {{talk header|noarchive=yes}} | {{talk header|noarchive=yes}} | ||
| {{archives | |||
| {| class="{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}} messagebox" | |||
| | collapsed = yes | |||
| | {{#if:{{{header|}}}|rowspan="2"}} align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | |||
| | bot = MiszaBot III | |||
| | age = 90 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archives|banner=yes|list=|small=yes|prefix=|root=}} | |||
| <!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox" | |||
| | align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | |||
| |align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why. | |align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why. | ||
| |} | |} --> | ||
| {{bots|deny=SineBot}} | {{bots|deny=SineBot,DPL bot}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 125K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 41 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| |algo = old(3d) | |||
| |algo = old(90d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| {{archives | |||
| | collapsed = yes | |||
| | bot = MiszaBot III | |||
| | age = 3 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{search archives | small=yes}} | |||
| == The ICC Barnstar == | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You deserve it. | |||
| |} | |||
| == Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
| ]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| == IPCC == | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| I see you've edited it. In that case, maybe you'd like to join the discussion at requests for prot as to whether it should be unprotected or not? Oh, I've just looked, everyone is too scared of arbcomm to touch it or even dare comment :-( What a happy place wikipedia is nowadays ] (]) 22:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I feel the article probably ought to be unprotected (quote me on this if you wish), but ''everyone is too scared of arbcomm to touch it or even dare comment :-('' is probably pretty accurate, with the additional caveat that I really don't have time to take that detailed of a look; I have been able to come online for just very small time intervals recently. However, John Vandenberg is right in that an extra few days (even two weeks, really) or so probably won't hurt all that much. I'll check on the talk page discussion tomorrow, as it seems well on the way to resolving itself. If everything seems OK, I'll check with Jayvdb about unprotecting the article. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 22:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: Woo careful, you can get into trouble for saying that kind of thing :-) ] (]) 22:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::A clearly labeled sarcastic comment obviously designed juxtapose both situations in hope that John Vandenberg would see things from your perspective is certainly not the same as you being "uncivil and antagonistic to...toward administrators..." I'm disappointed with that diff, but then again, I am rather disappointed a great deal by this proposed decision. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 22:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Looks like Rlevese is running away from it :-). Meanwhile, did you get anywhere with Jayvdb? ] (]) 15:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::That was rather interesting about Rlevse. I am just as much in the dark as you about why; the clerks-l email thread didn't explain anything really.<p>I haven't spoken to Jayvdb yet. I did however post on the talk page of IPCC with something to refocus the discussion. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 16:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Interesting conversation. ++]: ]/] 15:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| == The Witch of Pungo == | |||
| ] | |||
| I finally found a site with a great synopsis of the details of the legal proceedings, plus one with the original court transcript plus one with the transcript in modern English. This gave me plenty for ] and enough for the summary in ]. It's now at ] under "The Witch of Pungo". I thought you'd like to look at it and maybe review for DYK. Thanks for the prior and future help. My first double DYK hook too.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 20:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| :Ah, Pungo. When I was a kid (in Virginia) I thought that was the coolest name for a town... Pungo, Pungo, Pungo. Right up there with ]. ] (]) 20:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| ::I actually knew someone whose last name was Bumpass or Bumpas. SBHB-feel free to help on the articles too. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 21:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| I've put up an alt hook that'd be good for Halloween. Give it a look. Check mail too. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 01:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Took a look at the page. Looks good. Emailed you back. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 03:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Attention please == | |||
| {{unresolved}} | |||
| Hi there NUKE, VASCO here, longtime "no see", | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| I would like for you to have a look at this situation: at ], a ]n user "dedicated" this summary to me (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3_Sepsi&diff=383274942&oldid=383161917). If you check the previous 10, 20 summaries, what did i say to make him go all "Don't edit here again, this article is MINE" (keep in mind it's about a Romanian footballer, and the user also hails from that country)? I think nothing! | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| Also, after he re-verted my work, he wrote the sentence, in CLUB CAREER: "He impressed at Gloria for offensive game , and has attracted the eye from Europe teams. He making 45 apparences for Gloria .", which means, of course, NOTHING in English (horrible language, mixing past and present tense, having a go at POV/WEASEL, etc). Also, not the first time he shouts at me, although this was the first time in all-caps (see previous "politeness" here http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cosmin_Contra&diff=375443917&oldid=375274919). In same section called CLUB CAREER, he divided it into sub-sections which consisted of storylines with sometimes one, yes ONE (!) line. And i have to "get out!"?!? | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| (Some of) the stuff in previous paragraph leads me to this: he has ZERO knowledge of English, writes almost no summaries, and does not answer to talkpage messages, sometimes not even to his countrymen (one would think he would not reply due to not knowing English, but that theory falls to the dirt when it comes to his fellow Romanian users - i know what i am talking about, i checked the latest "stuff" in his talkpage). | |||
| ] | |||
| All in all, i told him i would watch Sepsi's article closely (please see full message from me here http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Zupfk#Pay_attention), politely but to-the-point. I would greatly appreciate it if you could monitor this stuff (especially the Zupfk user, i will eye Sepsi's article from time to time) for a while, if it's not too much trouble. | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Passed == | |||
| {{unresolved}} | |||
| Well, my RfA passed (just!) so I've come to leave a message here to say that I will be happy to take a look at the OTRS queue. I would like to gain a better understanding of the BLP policy and make a real attempt to show the opposers that I can be trusted. Cheers, ]] 11:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Mass killings under Communist regimes == | |||
| {{unresolved}} | |||
| Is there another edit war brewing at ]? Is the 1RR restriction still in place? ] (]) 15:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for initiating the thread. A user Mark Nutley who threw absolutely artificial accusation on 1RR violation against me (part of the discussion is there ) now attacked another user there . Since you NW are the administrator who imposed 1RR on this article, I invite you to comment on that there .--] (]) 16:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit request == | |||
| I suggest you examine the "edits" closely - the current version ''now'' affirms that this is all anti-semitism <g>. Suggest reversion to the stable (that is, not cut by more than half) article with full protection at this point. ] (]) 16:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :The user TFD, who is you old opponent on the article's talk page, is also a zealous opponent of any anti-Semitism. I believe, you should discuss the issue with him first: probably you both will come to some common terms at least about that. In any event, since your opposition to TFD's edits and ''vise versa'' is one of the major article's issue, it would be good if you both tried to fix anti-Semite issues together (as soon as you realised that the problem exists).--] (]) 16:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change<br/> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></nowiki></code> | |||
| <br/>to<br/> | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></span></nowiki></code> | |||
| that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! ] (]) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi NW. This is a bit of an odd note, but, hey, process :-) | |||
| :Also, please make two other changes. The {{tag|center|o}} tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed {{tag|center|o}} tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after <code><nowiki>{{Babel|en-5|es-1}}</nowiki></code>, lease remove <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki></center></nowiki></code> and change <code><nowiki>|400px]]</nowiki></code> to <code><nowiki>|center|400px]]</nowiki></code>. Thank you for your cooperation. —] (]) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| A few months back you closed a rather desultory deletion discussion at ], a scrappy article on an Indian industrialist. I came across a recreation of this on IRC today - someone repeatedly trying to delete it as no claim of notability, which didn't seem right - and I went in to clean it up and so on. Notability seemed fairly well established, but I noticed after I'd done the legwork that there'd been the early AFD, so I suppose it means I've ''de facto'' overturned your decision to close it. | |||
| == Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
| Do you mind? I'm happy to run it past DRV or the like - I really don't know what the due process ought to be here - but the old discussion was pretty vague and the old article was pretty atrocious, so a recreation with sourced and significant content seems not unreasonable. But I don't want it to seem like I'm sneaking off and overturning your decisions willy-nilly, so I thought I'd run it past you! ] | ] | 01:20, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I trust your judgment entirely in these matters. Feel free to take any action you wish, irregardless of any previous decision I may have made. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 01:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|GregJackP|Climate change alarmism|ts=13:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
| ]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==What's good for the goose...== | |||
| I see that you have article-banned, GregJackP. In the interest of fairness and consistency, can you please issue the same article-ban against WMC, too? He's clearly edit-warring. Thanks. ] (]) 13:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:24, 1 January 2025
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
The ICC Barnstar
|
The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit | |
| You deserve it. |
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of National Association of Colleges and Employers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Association of Colleges and Employers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/National Association of Colleges and Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Sdkb 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request
Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change
<span class="plainlinks">
to
<span class="plainlinks"></span>
that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! Zinnober9 (talk) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, please make two other changes. The
<center>tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed<center>tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply<center>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after{{Babel|en-5|es-1}}, lease remove<center>and</center>and change|400px]]to|center|400px]]. Thank you for your cooperation. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)